Village of Kenilworth

Similar documents
September 9, Geneva Community Unit School District 304, Kane County, Illinois. Update on Debt Restructuring Options

Navigating Statewide Property Tax Freeze for Public Bodies

The Property Tax Limitation Law

January 11, Glen Ellyn School District 41, Du Page County, Illinois. Referendum Options

Prospect Heights Park District, Cook County, Illinois

Bond Election is called by the Board of Trustees Bonds are authorized by the voters Bonds are sold

Forsyth County Planning and Financing Capital Projects

BONDS 101 AND MARKET UPDATE

DATE ISSUED: 9/16/ of 9 LDU CCA(LOCAL)-X

SPEER FINANCIAL, INC. INDEPENDENT MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS SINCE 1954

ROBERT LEWIS SVP / MANAGING DIRECTOR PMA SECURITIES, INC. Center Cass 66. Referendum Overview JANUARY 5, 2017

City Council Agenda Cover Memorandum

DATE ISSUED: 7/7/ of 11 LDU CA(LOCAL)-X

PEOTONE CUSD 207U 2018 Tax Levy Information

LOCAL REVENUE SOURCES

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY IN ACCORDANCE WITH NRS (C)

Bonds 101: An Overview of City Financing

(1) the School Code of the State of Illinois, as amended (the School Code );

Debt Management Policy

CUSD 200. Financing Options for Refinancing/Restructuring ROBERT E. LEWIS III SVP MANAGING DIRECTOR PMA SECURITIES, INC.

Oak Park School District 97, Cook County, IL

ICCCFO Spring Conference

VILLAGE OF BELLWOOD Cook County, Illinois

DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

Darien Park District, DuPage County, Illinois. $939,590* General Obligation Limited Tax Park Bonds, Series 2017

MUNICIPAL BONDS IN TEXAS and THE BOND SALE PROCESS

Randy L. Brown, Business Administrator 131 West Nittany Avenue State College, PA

BOARD POLICY 6350 DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

Agenda Cover Memorandum

MEMORANDUM. Mr. Mark C. Mason, CPA Financial Services Director, City of Tamarac, Florida

Debt Service and Long Term Financing

CITY OF RIO RANCHO, NEW MEXICO DEBT OBLIGATIONS. There are five types of bonds that the City of Rio Rancho normally issues:

DEBT MANAGEMENT EXAMINATION (1/19)

DEBT POLICY AND CREDIT RATINGS

DEBT SERVICE FUND OVERVIEW AND DETAIL

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY IN ACCORDANCE WITH NRS (C)

UTILITY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT FINANCING

DEBT POLICY AND CREDIT RATINGS

DEBT MANAGEMENT EXAMINATION

Town of East Greenwich. Overview of Municipal Bonds

Understanding the Consolidation Potential of:

School Facilities Financing

Public Finance Tools to Fund Infrastructure February 22, 2018

BEXAR COUNTY DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

Debt Service and Long Term Financing

DEBT POLICY AND CREDIT RATINGS

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago; General Obligation

Debt Service. Types of City Bonds. There are five types of bonds that the City of Rio Rancho normally issues:

CONTINUING DISCLOSURE UNDERTAKING DISSEMINATION INFORMATION COVER SHEET ANNUAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

Accrued Interest A currently unpaid amount of interest that has accumulated since the last payment on a bond or other fixed-income security.

Crystal Lake Park District, McHenry County, Illinois. $700,000* General Obligation Limited Tax Park Bonds, Series 2017A

DEBT POLICY SAN JUAN COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT #3 D/B/A/ORCAS ISLAND HEALTH CARE DISTRICT. Section I. Purpose and Overview

Little Known Avenues for Funding Technology

CITY OF TEXARKANA, TEXAS

ABSTRACT OF VOTES in Kane County, Illinois at the General Primary on March 20th, 2018

Dallas Austin Chicago Houston Miami New York San Antonio San Diego

ROLL CALL. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois (the Board ), from

FINANCIAL AND DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICIES

Bond Financed Capital Project Funds Described

Bonds 101. Michigan Association of School Boards. November 10, PFM Financial Advisors LLC. 555 Briarwood Circle Suite 333

Debt Administration Certified Government Finance Officer Review Session February 2018

Mount Diablo Unified School District

DISTRICT HISTORY Referendum ($585,000) Purchase of 10 Acres / Football Field Original junior high building (present old section of MS)

There is no legal debt limit for counties in Virginia, since the issuance of all county general obligation debt is subject to referendum.

VILLAGE OF GLENVIEW ILLINOIS FINANCIAL POLICY MANUAL

Financing Options Using Bonds for Illinois Cities and Villages PART 1

PRELIMINARY TERM SHEET DATED SEPTEMBER 28, North Berwyn Park District, Cook County, Illinois

COUNTY OF KENOSHA DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY AND LONG TERM OBLIGATIONS. June, 2014

Policy No.: ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Original Date: May 17, Page: 1 of 10 Owner: Financial and Administrative Services

City of Fishers, Indiana Debt Management Policy

FINANCIAL AND DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICIES

Financing Alternatives

RECOMMENDATION Adopt a Resolution approving the Debt Management and Disclosure Policy.

Introduction to General Obligation Bonds

Important Information about Investing in Municipal Bonds

BOARD POLICY NO. 036 SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DEBT POLICY

POST BOARD ACTION REPORT NEW ITEMS AGENDA

KEY CONSIDERATIONS: DEVELOPING A SUCCESSFUL BOND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

FINANCING CAPITAL PROJECTS: Strategies to Make Your Project a Reality

Fundamentals of a Bond Sale & Current Market Impacts

Help! I need funds to operate!

Funding Transportation Improvements

Public Safety Pension Funding JEFF FIEGENSCHUH, CITY MANAGER

Board of Education Park Ridge Niles School District 64

PRELIMINARY TERM SHEET DATED SEPTEMBER 25, Waukegan Park District, Lake County, Illinois

Important Information about Variable Rate Demand Notes (also known as Put Bonds or Seven-Day Floaters)

Debt Service Management 102

Oak Park Village, Illinois; General Obligation

They Are Regulating What?

Taxation Hearing Eastern Carver County Schools December 12, 2013

GASB 45 Conference: The Next Great Financial Challenge

There is no legal debt limit for counties in Virginia, since the issuance of all county general obligation debt is subject to referendum.

Financial Management Plan for the Palatine Public Library District

Arrowhead Metropolitan District

1. The City of Boise shall annually adopt a balanced budget where operating revenues are equal to, or exceed, operating expenditures.

MUNICIPAL BONDING AN INTRODUCTION FOR LOCAL LEADERS

Debt Administration 101. FGFOA Palm Beach Chapter. April 10, Presenters:

Massachusetts Municipal Auditors and Accountants Association Annual Meeting South Yarmouth, Massachusetts June 11, 2018 Peter Frazier, Managing

DEBT MANAGEMENT. The Chief Financial Officer shall be responsible for carrying out this policy and developing recommendations for debt financing.

Debt Service Management

Transcription:

Village of Kenilworth Village Board of Trustees KW2023 FUNDING AND OPTIONS FOR THE SERIES 2015B BONDS September 18, 2017

Village of Kenilworth Funding Options KW2023 Phase II No formal decision regarding next phase of KW2023 Window of opportunity nears funding without property tax increase Primary focus of discussion consideration of two bonding options First, overview of potential expenses and sources

Village of Kenilworth KW2023 Ph. II Estimated Costs Phase II Two primary objectives Flooding relief (likely area south of Kenilworth Ave) Water main improvements (improve fire hydrant flows) P/W Committee to weigh in on potential project areas Past project construction costs used to estimate Ph. II costs Estimated project cost = $8.5M (KW2023 plan estimated $9.3M) In 2012 indicated we would do our best to not rely solely upon property tax increases to fund phases May have identified opportunity to fund Phase II without increasing property taxes

KW2023 Potential Ph. II Funding Sources KW2023 Phase II Estimate flooding/water main improvements $8,500,000 Fund Balances (12/31/16) ($3,290,000) Grant Source(s) ($1,300,000) Unfunded $3,910,000 Fund Balance Sources KW2023 $1,500,000 Gen. Fund $700,000 CIP $500,000 Sewer $200,000 Debt. Svc. $390,000 Total $3,290,000

Village of Kenilworth Options to Fund Remaining $4M KW2023 Ph. II Remaining Need Approximately $4M Potential options include: Bond Issuance Scale Back Phase II Delay and Pay/Go If Issuing Bonds Two primary options Neither would trigger a property tax increase

Village of Kenilworth Primary Bond Options Option 1 General Obligation Bonds Approximately $4M issuance Issued after voter referendum (March or November 2018) Debt Service = <$410,000/year Refunded in 2029, 12 years Option 2 Alternate Revenue Source Bonds Approximately $4m issuance Debt service by extension of debt service base as approved by referendum Debt Service = < $400,000/year Refunded in 2031, 14 years

Series 2015B Bond Maturing Series 2015B Bond Maturity 12/01/18 Purpose Public Works Facility Debt Service 2017 = $416,400 2018 = $416,000 Potential Debt Service Extension Currently - $600,000/year authorized Addition of $400,000 for total of $1M/yr. Requires Referenda

STATUTORY DEBT LIMIT Village of Kenilworth, Cook County, IL Statutory Debt Limit Equalized Assessed Valuation 2016 321,843,015 Times: Statutory Debt Limit 8.63% 27,758,960 Less: Outstanding Bond Principal (8,679,273) Net Debt Limit 19,079,687 Note: Does not include Alternate Revenue Source Bonds (ARS) 8

NON-REFERENDUM DEBT LIMIT Village of Kenilworth, Cook County, IL Non-Referendum Rollover Bond Limit (Annual) Equalized Assessed Valuation 2016 321,843,015 Times:.5% 0.50% 1,609,215 Less: Outstanding Non-Referendum Bonds after 12/1/2017 - Net Non-Referendum Bonding Authority 1,609,215 9

OUTSTANDING DEBT Dated Issue Series Original Par Earliest Call Maturity October 21, 2015 G.O. Refunding Bonds Series 2015B $1,155,000 Non-Callable Dec 1 October 21, 2015 G.O. Refunding Bonds (ARS) Series 2015A $3,225,000 12/1/2025 Dec 1 December 19, 2016 Taxable Private Placement 2016 $590,273 Non-Callable Dec 1 August 15, 2013 GO Bonds Series 2013 $9,590,000 12/1/2023 12/1 (Final Maturity 8/15/2033) Credit Ratings (Moody/S&P/Fitch) Moody's Aaa s = sinking fund payment 2017 385,000 4.000% 180,000 3.000% 594,273 0.980% 395,000 2.000% t = final sinking fund 2018 400,000 4.000% 185,000 3.000% 400,000 2.000% payment / term maturity 2019 190,000 3.000% 410,000 2.000% vr= variable rate 2020 195,000 3.000% 415,000 2.250% ytm= yield to maturity 2021 200,000 3.000% 425,000 3.000% 2022 205,000 3.000% 440,000 3.000% 2023 215,000 3.000% 455,000 3.000% 2024 220,000 3.000% 465,000 4.000% 2025 225,000 3.000% 485,000 4.000% 2026 235,000 3.000% 505,000 4.000% 2027 240,000 3.000% 525,000 4.000% 2028 250,000 3.000% 545,000 4.000% 2029 255,000 3.000% 565,000 4.000% 2030 265,000 3.000% 590,000 4.000% 2031 615,000 4.000% 2032 640,000 4.000% 2033 670,000 4.000% Callable $0 $1,245,000 $0 $5,605,000 Non-Callable 785,000 3,060,000 594,273 8,545,000 Refunded Total Outstanding $785,000 $4,305,000 $594,273 $14,150,000 Purpose/ Notes Refunding 2007 Referendum Bonds Refunding 2006 ARS Bonds New Money -Non-Referendum New Money approved by Referendum 2013 (Water Revenue) Water, sewer, road improvements Senior Underwriter BOSC, Inc. Robert W. Baird & Co Baird Bond Counsel Chapman & Cutler Chapman & Cutler Chapman & Cutler Chapman & Cutler Financial Advisor William Blair William Blair William Blair William Blair 10

BONDING OPTIONS The Village s 2015B bonds (refunding of a prior referendum bond) will be repaid in full in December of 2018 resulting in a reduction of the debt service levy in 2018 by approximately $416,000 This allows the Village the opportunity to proceed with funding of its capital plan through the next phase via referendum in either March of 2018 or November of 2018 with a no tax increase proposition The Village issues non-referendum bonds to fund corporate purposes, with the debt service paid from the Village s Debt Service Extension Base (DSEB) $600,000 annually The Village can also use a portion of the DSEB to issue bonds used to repay Alternate Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source or ARS) The following options review referendum proposals that do not increase the annual total debt payments and provide $4M for the capital plan: Option 1: $4M of referendum approved general obligation bonds at the March 2018 election Option 2: Increase of the Debt Service Extension Base via referendum to allow for the issuance of $4M non-referendum ARS bonds repaid from annual issues of non-referendum bonds; this scenario leaves some bonding authority left over for annual corporate purposes 11

OPTION 1: $4M REFERENDUM APPROVED BONDS MARCH 2018 Village of Kenilworth, Cook County, IL Option 1 - Series 2018 BQ General Obligation Referendum Bonds ($4MM) Proposed Annual Remaining Current Total Levy Equalized EAV Debt Service DSEB Bonds* DSEB Capacity GO (ULT)*** Proposed Series 2018 $4MM GO ULT Referendum Bonds Debt Service Debt Service Year Assessed Value Change Extension Base D/S D/S Debt Service Less CAPI Net Debt Service (Paid from Taxes) Tax Rate 2017 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-1,105,338 59,775 (59,775) - 1,705,338 0.53 2018 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-691,338 399,550-399,550 1,690,888 0.53 2019 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-688,138 401,150-401,150 1,689,288 0.52 2020 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-688,800 402,450-402,450 1,691,250 0.53 2021 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-691,050 398,450-398,450 1,689,500 0.52 2022 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-692,850 399,300-399,300 1,692,150 0.53 2023 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-689,200 399,850-399,850 1,689,050 0.52 2024 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-690,600 400,100-400,100 1,690,700 0.53 2025 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-691,200 400,050-400,050 1,691,250 0.53 2026 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-691,000 399,700-399,700 1,690,700 0.53 2027 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-690,000 399,050-399,050 1,689,050 0.52 2028 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-688,200 403,100-403,100 1,691,300 0.53 2029 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-690,600 401,700-401,700 1,692,300 0.53 2030 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-692,000 - - 1,292,000 0.40 2031 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-692,400 - - 1,292,400 0.40 2032 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000-688,909 - - 1,288,909 0.40 2033 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000 - - - - 600,000 0.19 2034 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000 - - - - 600,000 0.19 2035 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000 - - - - 600,000 0.19 2036 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000 - - - - 600,000 0.19 12,000,000-11,461,623 4,864,225 (59,775) 4,804,450 28,266,073 Notes: *DSEB Bonds annual taxable private placements each year into the future **ARS Bonds include Series 2015A paid from Water Revenues ***GO (Unlimited Tax) Bonds include Series 2013 and Series 2015B Rates used are based on recent IL public sale AAA-rated plus 0.020% cushion. All in True Interest Cost as of Sept 15, 2017: 2.71% Proceeds: 4,000,000 12

OPTION 1: $4M REFERENDUM APPROVED BONDS MARCH 2018 Option 1 - Series 2018 BQ General Obligation Referendum Bonds ($4MM) 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000-2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Proposed Annual DSEB Bonds* Current ULT Debt Service Proposed Series 2018 $4MM GO ULT Referendum Bonds Debt Service Extension Base 13

OPTION 2: DSEB INCREASE REFERENDUM WITH $4M ARS BONDS Village of Kenilworth, Cook County, IL Option 2 - Series 2018 Alternate Revenue Soure Bonds $4M Proposed Annual Proposed Annual Remaining Current Proposed 2018 Proposed 2018 Total Levy Equalized EAV Debt Service DSEB Bonds* DSEB Bonds* GO (ULT)*** ARS Bonds Less: ARS Bonds Paid Debt Service Debt Service Year Assessed Value Change Extension Base Corp Purposes ARSBond Repayment DSEB Capacity D/S Debt Service Cap I From DSEB Bonds** (Paid from Taxes) Tax Rate 2017 321,843,015 0.00% 600,000 600,000 - - 1,105,338 62,477 (62,477) - 1,705,338 0.530 2018 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 640,046 359,954-691,338 359,954-359,954 1,691,338 0.526 2019 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 639,746 360,254-688,138 360,254-360,254 1,688,138 0.525 2020 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 641,946 358,054-688,800 358,054-358,054 1,688,800 0.525 2021 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 644,296 355,704-691,050 355,704-355,704 1,691,050 0.525 2022 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 640,171 359,829-692,850 359,829-359,829 1,692,850 0.526 2023 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 642,971 357,029-689,200 357,029-357,029 1,689,200 0.525 2024 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 640,921 359,079-690,600 359,079-359,079 1,690,600 0.525 2025 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 644,515 355,485-691,200 355,485-355,485 1,691,200 0.525 2026 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 643,615 356,385-691,000 356,385-356,385 1,691,000 0.525 2027 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 643,475 356,525-690,000 356,525-356,525 1,690,000 0.525 2028 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 643,975 356,025-688,200 356,025-356,025 1,688,200 0.525 2029 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 639,825 360,175-690,600 360,175-360,175 1,690,600 0.525 2030 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 641,200 358,800-692,000 358,800-358,800 1,692,000 0.526 2031 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 642,925 357,075-692,400 357,075-357,075 1,692,400 0.526 2032 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - 688,909 - - 1,688,909 0.525 2033 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - - - 1,000,000 0.311 2034 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - - - 1,000,000 0.311 2035 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - - - 1,000,000 0.311 2036 321,843,015 0.00% 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - - - 1,000,000 0.311 14,589,629 5,010,371-11,461,623 5,072,848 (62,477) 5,010,371 31,061,623 All in True Interest Cost as of Sept 15, 2017: 2.98% Proceeds: 4,000,000 Notes: *DSEB Bonds annual taxable private placements each year into the future a portion of which is used for corporate purposes and a portion to pay bond debt service **ARS (Alternate Revenue Source) Bonds use Annual Rollover bonding authority to repay debt leaving less available for general corporate purposes ***GO (Unlimited Tax) Bonds include Series 2013 and Series 2015B 14

OPTION 2: DSEB INCREASE REFERENDUM WITH $4M ARS BONDS Option 2 - Series 2018 Alternate Revenue Soure Bonds 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000-2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Proposed Annual DSEB Bonds* Corp Purposes $4M Proposed 2018 ARS Bonds Paid From DSEB Bonds** Current ULT Debt Service Debt Service Extension Base 15

FINANCING CONSIDERATIONS Referendum approved bonds gives the Village the most financial flexibility going forward because they do not tax the DSEB bonding authority, leaving that available for general corporate purposes (Option 1). Option 2 also preserves a portion of the Villages DSEB bonding authority for corporate purposes but increases the DSEB to allow for the issue of $4M ARS bonds which are repaid with DSEB bonds. The other advantage to Option 2 is that the DSEB is a permanent increase, so once the $4M ARS bonds are retired, the entire DSEB is available for use by the Village. If the Village chooses not to use the full DSEB once the bonds are retired, it still remains for future use by the Village. BOTH of these options do not increase taxes beyond the amount the taxpayers are currently paying. 16

Village of Kenilworth Potential Next Steps Board makes decision re Phase II P/W Comm. meets to discuss project areas Decision regarding Phase II bonds Last referenda opportunity before 2015B drops November 2018 Alternate Rev. (via DSEB) or General Obligation bonds Public information regarding need/approach March 2018 or November 2018 Grant funding pursued (in progress) Preliminary engineering commences