International Issues 409A/457A

Similar documents
Anatomy of a Deferred Compensation Plan

Part-Timers and Locations and Turnover Oh My! An Overview of Employee Benefits Issues for Retail Organizations

Code Section 409A: Revisiting the Basics

Preparing For and Managing g Plan Audits

Mergers, Acquisitions, and Other

Anatomy of an Equity Compensation Plan

401(k) Plan Issues Presenters: April 16, 2013

$500 Carryover Opportunity for Cafeteria Plan Health FSAs: Worth the Effort?

The Road to 2014: ACA Considerations for Group Health Plans

Treasury Finalizes Section 415 Regulations, and Compensation Issues Emerge. October 23, 2007

DOL Releases Final Disclosure Regulations for Participant-Directed Individual Account Plans. October 26, 2010

Fiduciary Issues for Retirement

Affordable Care Act Tasks:

IRS Issues Guidance Permitting Tax-Free Treatment of Employer-Provided Cell Phones and PDAs. September 19, 2011

Anatomies of Severance and Release Agreements

France: Amending Finance Law for 2011 and Initial Finance Law for January 2012

THIRD PARTY REIMBURSEMENT OF COVERED ENTITIES: MANUFACTURERS PERSPECTIVE

2016 PLAN SPONSOR BASICS 401(k) ISSUES. Presenters: Lisa Barton and Elizabeth Kennedy November 9, 2016

SECTION 4062(e) PLANT SHUTDOWN LIABILITY

Preparation for IPOs & Eurobond offerings

Bad Actor Disqualification in Private Placements New Rule 506(d)

Congress s Challenges to the

After the Delay: Remaining ACA Employer and Group Health Plan Considerations for 2013 and 2014

Biography. Mary B. Hevener Washington, D.C. T F

Pension Protection Act of 2006 New Funding and Related Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. August 22, 2006

Economic and Political Environment in Ukraine and Russia

SEC Approves Final NYSE and NASDAQ Compensation Committee Rules

New Guidance Related to Form W-2 Reporting Requirements. July 7, 2011

Understanding the Requirements and Impact of the Volcker Rule and the Final Regulations. February 11, 2014

SEC Issues Final Guidance on Executive Compensation Disclosure. December 21, 2009

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) Is it a good idea?

The Impact of Code Section 409A on Global Compensation Plans

NAVIGATING US TAX REFORM:

Buying Unionized Companies: What Private

COMPENSATION CLAWBACKS: TAX CONSEQUENCES FOR ISSUERS AND EXECUTIVES

M&A ACADEMY: TAX ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS

TAX ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS

PLAN SPONSOR BASICS: RETIREMENT PLAN. Presenters: Lisa H. Barton and Mark J. Simons September 22, 2015

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

BENEFITS AND COMPENSATION: MISSION CRITICAL FOR TECH COMPANY SUCCESS

M&A ACADEMY EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS. Presenters: Colby Smith and David Zelikoff February 14, 2017

OSHA to Offer Alternative Dispute Resolution for Whistleblower Complaints

NAVIGATING US TAX REFORM:

IMPLICATIONS OF US TAX REFORM FOR HEDGE FUNDS, INVESTORS, AND MANAGERS

MMI Legal & Compliance Webinar: The Volcker Rule and the Final Regulations. January 15, Charles M. Horn Julie A. Marcacci

PLAN TERMINATION ISSUES

Issues for Broker-Dealers acting as APs or LMMs for ETFs

February 2015

IRS Moves Forward with Plan to Change the Determination Letter Process

SEC and FINRA 2010 Year in Review

DOL Publishes Interim Final ERISA Regulation on Service Provider Disclosure Obligations. July 21, 2010

NAVIGATING US TAX REFORM:

Global Benefits & Compensation

PREPARING FOR A CHANGE IN CONTROL

THE TRANSFORMATION OF INVESTMENT ADVICE: DIGITAL ADVISERS AS FIDUCIARIES

INTERIM GUIDANCE ON APPLICATION OF 457A. A. Section 457A In General

2016 PLAN SPONSOR BASICS PLAN AUDIT ISSUES. Presenters: Amy Pocino Kelly and Susan Lastowski November 16, 2016

Regulation of Advisers (Part II): Brokerage and Trading Practices

UK Investment: Tech Issues for Entrepreneurs, Start-Ups and Investors. presenters Amy Comer Matthew Howse Kate Habershon Tracy Evlogidis

REQUIREMENTS AND HIGHLIGHTS OF THE VOLCKER RULE AND ITS REGULATIONS

Changes to Hedge Fund Disclosure and Reporting Obligations

IRS Audit Focus on Executive Compensation

M&A ACADEMY CHOOSING AN ACQUISITION STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURING A DEAL

UNDERSTANDING THE NEW BEAT TAX

Up We Go Again Financial Threshold Increases Effective 1 July 2016

New IRS Guidance On Deferred Compensation

Expatriation Pursuant to the Heroes Act

Navigating the Proposed 409A Regulations-General Rules By Mary K. Samsa, Joyce L. Meyer, and Barbara A. Cronin

Final 409A Deferred Compensation Regulations

INVESTMENT FUNDS ALERT

Pennsylvania Treasury Issues Guidance Document Interpreting 2016 Amendments to the Pennsylvania Unclaimed Property Law

CONSUMER-DRIVEN HEALTHCARE POST-ACA. Presenters: Andy Anderson and Sage Fattahian March 30, 2016

Final ACA Shared Responsibility Regulations Released

IP ISSUES IN MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS

UNDERSTANDING CLOSED- END INTERVAL FUNDS Sean Graber, Partner Thomas S. Harman, Partner David W. Freese, Associate. June 7, 2017

NAVIGATING US TAX REFORM:

SEC PROPOSED STANDARDS OF CONDUCT. FOR RETAIL ADVICE Chris Cox Jennifer Klass Steven Stone Brian Baltz May 9, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

H. Compensation. Present Law

Dealing With Underwater Options

Section 162(m) Compliance Overview and Update Presenters: Mary B. Hevener Daniel L. Hogans Vicki M. Nielsen

Executive Summary New Section 457A (Nonqualified Deferred Compensation)

What to do When the SEC Examiner Calls

Tax Alert. China Issues New Tax Rules on Corporate Restructurings. I. Overview

March An Act to provide for the reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018

NAVIGATING US TAX REFORM:

Section 457A: Not Going Away

SOUTH DAKOTA V. WAYFAIR

NAVIGATING US TAX REFORM:

SEC PROPOSES LIQUIDITY RISK- MANAGEMENT RULES. Christopher D. Menconi, Sean Graber, Beau Yanoshik, David W. Freese January 20, 2016

Charles A. Sweet, Managing Director/Practice Development Leader, Structured Transactions, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, D.C.

FROM VIE TO SAFE: TECH INVESTMENTS INTO AND FROM CHINA

INITIAL GUIDANCE ON NEW DEFERRED COMPENSATION RULES

Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009: Brace for the Next Wave of Discrimination Litigation

EMPLOYMENT & COMPLIANCE ISSUES & PITFALLS IN CROSS- BORDER M&A TRANSACTIONS

New IRS Notice Provides Employers with Ability to Correct Defects in Nonqualified Plan Documents

M&A ACADEMY: THIRD PARTY REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES INSURANCE IN STRATEGIC AND PE DEALS

Developing Effective Resolution Strategies and Plans for Systemically Important Insurers; Consultative Document 3 November 2015

M&A ACADEMY PURCHASE PRICE ADJUSTMENTS & EARN- OUTS

Equity Compensation Strategies for Technology Companies to Consider in Merger and Presenters

IMPLEMENTING THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP RULES. April 18, 2018 Charles Horn, Melissa Hall, Ignacio Sandoval

Transcription:

409A Basics A Webinar Series International Issues 409A/457A Presenters: Daniel L. Hogans Zaitun Poonja Heather C. Brookfield www.morganlewis.com June 6, 2012

International Application of Section 409A US U.S. Taxpayers Section 409A applies to deferred compensation regardless of the country in which the compensation is earned, unless an exemption applies. U.S. taxpayers = U.S. citizens, legal permanent residents (i.e., green-card holders), and temporary residents Nonresident Aliens Deferred compensation is subject to 409A only if the services are performed in the United States Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 2

Exemptions from 409A for Foreign Deferred Compensation Arrangements Tax equalization agreements If payments are made by the end of the second calendar year that begins after the year in which a U.S. income tax return must be filed for the year to which the tax equalization payment relates. Certain foreign separation pay plans If the separation pay is required to be paid under the applicable law of the foreign jurisdiction and it only applies to foreign-earned income from sources within that jurisdiction. Applicable to voluntary and involuntary separations. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 3

Exemptions from 409A for Foreign Deferred Compensation Arrangements Broad-based foreign retirement e e t plans Exemption applies if the plan is nondiscriminatory as to the provision of benefits, actually provides significant benefits to covered employees, and by its terms or under local law it has restrictions on the use of the benefits under the plan other than for retirement. For U.S. citizens and resident aliens who are not residents of a U.S. possession, exemption applies if, in addition to the above: the contributions are nonelective; the contributions are made from modified foreign earned income; the limits applicable to U.S. plans under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 415 are not exceeded; and the individual is not eligible to participate in a U.S. qualified plan. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 4

Exemptions from 409A for Foreign Deferred Compensation Arrangements Plans covered by an applicable treaty t If contributions to the plan are excludable for federal income tax purposes pursuant to a bilateral income tax treaty to which the United States is a party. Foreign social security systems If covered under a totalization agreement between the United States and the foreign jurisdiction, or If the contributions are made to a government-mandated social security system. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 5

Exemptions from 409A for Foreign Deferred Compensation Arrangements Compensation deferred d by a nonresident alien If the compensation would not have been subject to U.S. income tax if it had been paid to the nonresident alien at the later of when: the legally binding right to the compensation first arose, or the legally binding right was no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (SROF). Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 6

What Compliance Steps Should Companies Take? Identify all foreign employees who are U.S. taxpayers. Identify all foreign benefit arrangements applicable to U.S. taxpayers that could provide for deferred compensation. Determine whether an exemption applies to the foreign deferred compensation arrangement. If no exemption applies, ensure that the arrangement is 409A compliant. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 7

IRC Section 457A Imposes unfavorable tax treatment on U.S. taxpayers deferring income under a nonqualified deferred compensation plan of a nonqualified entity. taxation occurs when SROF lapses If amount of deferred compensation is not determinable at the time the SROF lapses, taxation, ti plus interest t and an additional 20% tax, occurs when the amount becomes determinable. Amounts will not be determinable if they are based on factors that remain variable at the time that the SROF lapses. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 8

What Constitutes a 457A SROF? SROF = Right to compensation generally is conditioned d upon a requirement that a service provider perform substantial services. does not include attainment of performance goals Definition is applicable for all purposes p under 457A: when amounts are includible in income whether amounts constitute short-term deferrals Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 9

What Constitutes 457A Nonqualified Deferred Compensation? Generally consistent with the 409A definition 457A may include certain cash-settled SARs that are otherwise exempt from 409A Short-term deferrals excluded: amounts paid within 12 months after the end of the taxable year of the service recipient during which the SROF lapses exception is based on the 457A definition of SROF (which generally excludes performance goals) Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 10

What Entities Are Nonqualified Entities? Foreign corporations Exceptions: Substantially all of the foreign corporation s income is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States; or Substantially all of its income is subject to a comprehensive foreign income tax. Generally exists where a foreign country (other than Bermuda or the Netherlands Antilles) has entered into an income tax treaty with the United States and the foreign corporation is not subject to a more favorable tax regime in its country of residence than the otherwise imposed U.S. corporate income tax regime. U.S. and foreign partnerships Exception: Substantially all of the partnership s income is allocated to persons subject to U.S. tax or comprehensive income tax on the partnership income. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 11

Potential Application of 457A Offshore Hedge Funds Legislation targeted fee-deferral arrangements employed by offshore hedge funds. Countries without income tax treaties with the United States U.S. expatriate employees of multinationals working in countries or jurisdictions that do not have comprehensive income tax treaties with the United States. Certain Partnerships U.S. employees working for partnerships, the partners of which include foreign entities. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 12

Relevant Differences Between Sections 409A and 457A Negative Tax Consequences Section 409A permits compensation to be deferred beyond the vesting date as long as the deferral arrangement complies with the regulations. Taxation occurs under 457A when SROF lapses. A service provider subject to 457A will be subject to a 20% penalty tax and underpayment penalty to the extent the amount of compensation is not determinable at the time that the SROF lapses. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 13

Relevant Differences Between Sections 409A and 457A Different definitions of short-term deferral 409A = compensation that is always paid out within 2 ½ months after the end of the taxable year of the service provider or service recipient, if later, in which the amount is no longer subject to an SROF. 457A = compensation that is paid not later than 12 months after the end of the service recipient s taxable year in which the amount is no longer subject to an SROF. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 14

Relevant Differences Between Sections 409A and 457A Different definitions iti of SROF 409A definition includes attainment of performance goals, in addition to performance of services. Payor of compensation Section 409A applies to compensation paid by any entity; Section 457 applies only to compensation paid by a nonqualified entity. Exempt equity awards Certain cash-settled SARS that are exempt from 409A may be covered by Section 457A. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 15

Relevant Differences Between Sections 409A and 457A Type of Taxpayer Section 409A applies only to cash-method service providers; Section 457A applies to both cash- and accrual- method taxpayers. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 16

Case Study #1 Performance share unit (PSU) program of multinational l with early retirement feature that provides for continued vesting Potentially subject to 457A? Covers U.S. taxpayers? Employed by nonqualified entities? Practical considerations dealing with accelerated U.S. taxes Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 17

Case Study #2 UK-based London business organized as pass-through h entity sponsors long-term bonus program where service requirements for vesting lapse several years before scheduled payment date. Is employer a nonqualified entity? Who are the partners and where and how are they taxed? Are participants U.S. taxpayers? What if amount is not determinable when service requirements lapse? Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 18

Questions? Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 19

Contact Information Daniel L. Hogans 202.739.5510 dhogans@morganlewis.com Zaitun Poonja 650.843.7540 zpoonja@morganlewis.com Heather C. Brookfield 415.442.1023 hbrookfield@morganlewis.com Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 20

DISCLAIMER This communication is provided d as a general informational service to clients and friends of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. It should not be construed as, and does not constitute, legal advice on any specific matter, nor does this message create an attorney-client relationship. IRS Circular 230 Disclosure To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. For information about why we are required to include this legend, please see http://www.morganlewis.com/circular230. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 21

international presence Beijing Boston Brussels Chicago Dallas Frankfurt Harrisburg Houston Irvine London Los Angeles Miami New York Palo Alto Paris Philadelphia Pittsburgh Princeton Morgan, Lewis & San Bockius Francisco LLP Tokyo Washington 22Wilmington