California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Similar documents
Business Practice Manual For. Generator Management. Version 76

Business Practice Manual For. Generator Management. Version 8

Business Practice Manual For. Generator Management. Version Revision Date: August 7September 8, Page i

Business Practice Manual For. Generator Management. Version Revision Date: July 5October 1, Page i

Business Practice Manual For. Queue Management. Version 12

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff CAISO TARIFF APPENDIX CC

2014 Modification Assessment Cost and Accounting Report July 1, 2015

Interconnection Process Enhancements. Draft BPM Language Topic 15 Material Modification Review

LARGE GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT (LGIA) AMONG [INTERCONNECTION CUSTOMER] AND [PARTICIPATING TO] AND

2015 Modification Assessment Cost and Accounting Report March 1, 2017

RENEWABLE MARKET ADJUSTING TARIFF POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT

Smart Grid Small Generator Interconnection Procedures for New Distributed Resources 20 MW or Less Connected in Parallel with LIPA Distribution Systems

Regulation Director FERC Rates & Regulation. January 27, 2012

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Tariff. Appendix H. Grandfathered Metering & Settlement Provisions

Interconnection Process Enhancements Initiative

February 25, The documents submitted with this filing consist of this letter of transmittal and all attachments hereto, and the LGIA.

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Tariff

Smart Grid Small Generator Interconnection Procedures For Distributed Generators Less than 10 MW Connected in Parallel with LIPA s Radial

Distribution Group Study Process. August 26, 2014

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

TRANSMISSION OWNER ZONAL PLACEMENT PROCESS

Temporary Suspension of Resource Operations. Issue Paper

Temporary Suspension of Resource Operations BBB Issue Paper

ATTACHMENT H: Large Generator Interconnection Agreement (LGIA) STANDARD LARGE GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT

Studies, Study Results, & Project Cost Responsibility


Title Page Southern California Edison Company Tariff Title: Transmission Owners Tariff Tariff Record Title: First Revised Service Agreement No. 39 FER

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY TRANSMISSION OWNER TARIFF

Link to Generator Interconnection and Deliverability Allocation Procedures Cluster Process Summary provided

Proposal Concerning Modification to Smart Grid Small Generator Interconnection Procedures Appended to LIPA s Tariff for Electric Service

Business Practice Manual For. Generator Management. PRR: Clarifying changes to Generator Retirement Process

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. TRANSMISSION OWNER TARIFF Sixth Revised Volume 5

Ms. Roni Reese Senior Contracts Analyst California Independent System Operator Corporation 151 Blue Ravine Road Folsom, CA 95630

Southern Companies Attachment J (LGIP), Page 2 Standard Large Generator Interconnection Procedures (LGIP) (Applicable to Generating Facilities that ex

Transmission Association, Inc. Fourth Revised Sheet No. 140

IR Application Generator Facility Data Form Overview

January 31, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC Dear Ms.

BC Hydro Open Access Transmission Tariff Effective: 09 December 2010 OATT Attachment M-1 Appendix 5 Page 1

August 25, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC Dear Ms.

BIOENERGY MARKET ADJUSTING TARIFF POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT

GIDAP Cluster Process Updated October 31, 2016

2018 Interconnection Process Enhancements (IPE) Issue Paper

BANDERA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. Tariff for Electric Service. Sheet No. Section III 1.0

Generator Interconnection and Deliverability Allocation Procedures (GIDAP) Business Practice Manual (BPM) 6.1.4

APPLICATION FOR STANDARD CONTRACT BY A QUALIFYING COGENERATOR OR SMALL POWER PRODUCER

June 21, The documents submitted with this filing consist of this letter of transmittal and all attachments hereto, and the Letter Agreement.

Stakeholder Comments Template

9. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ISO AND PARTICIPATING TOs. Each Participating TO shall enter into a Transmission Control Agreement with the

Stakeholder Comments Template

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

August 25, Advice Letter 4677-E

ATTACHMENT G SMALL GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION PROCEDURES (SGIP) (For Generating Facilities No Larger Than 20 MW)

Amendment to extend exceptional dispatch mitigated energy settlement rules and modify residual imbalance energy settlement rules

2018 General Rate Case. Transmission & Distribution (T&D) Volume 3 R System Planning

SMALL GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION PROCEDURES (SGIP) (For Generating Facilities No Larger Than 20 MW)

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement FERC Electric Tariff

Interconnection and Local Delivery Service Agreement. between. Host Transmission Owner, Transmission Service Customer. Southwest Power Pool

RE: Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate Annual Update Filing in Docket No. ER (TO11)

transmission system. This project is referred to in the Transition Agreement as the Transmission Interconnection.

RE: Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate Annual Update Filing in Docket No. ER (TO11)

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

C. Appropriation a funding amount approved and designated by the City Commission as part of the capital budget process for project implementation.

SA 2840 ENTERGY ARKANSAS-STUTTGART SOLAR GIA VERSION Project J348 GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT. entered into by and between

SCHEDULE SGI : SMALL GENERATOR INTERCONNECTIONS OTHER THAN NET METERING

RECITALS. Now, Therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth, the Parties do hereby agree as follows:

ROCK ENERGY COOPERATIVE INTERCONNECTION POLICY Policy M Board Policy Interconnection and Parallel Operation of Distributed Generation

2018 Interconnection Process Enhancements (IPE) Stakeholder Call May 21, :00 a.m. 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time)


Business Practice Manual For. Generator Management. PRR: Clarifying changes to Generator Retirement Process. Formatted: Font: 24 pt, Kern at 14 pt

The Low Voltage Access Charge shall be determined in accordance with the ISO Tariff.

July 9, Advice Letters: 3050-E

Rule 22 Sheet 1 DIRECT ACCESS

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement FERC Electric Tariff

NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY. Full Requirements Power Sales Agreement. Dated as of April 24, 2015

2018 Interconnection Process Enhancements. Addendum #2 to Draft Final Proposal

SCHEDULE 72 INTERCONNECTIONS TO NON-UTILITY GENERATION

Stakeholder Comments Template

SURPLUS ENERGY PURCHASE AGREEMENT PARALLEL CUSTOMER GENERATION CGS 8 WISCONSIN AGGREGATE RENEWABLE CAPACITY OF 20 KILOWATTS OR LESS

2013 RPS Solicitation Request for Proposals Conference. January 13, 2014

Applications for Participating Transmission Owner Status Attachment C - Transmission Revenue Requirement

STANDARD GENERATION INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF ANAHEIM AND

Summary of Prior CAISO Filings and Commission Orders Concerning CAISO Market Redesign Efforts

April 29, CAISO Service Agreement No. 3788, Large Generator Interconnection Agreement

New York State Public Service Commission

T-D Interconnections: Best Value Planning White Paper January 2016

New York State Public Service Commission

APPENDIX IX ATTACHMENT 1 FORMULA RATE PROTOCOLS

September 8, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC Dear Ms.

Capacity Procurement Mechanism Risk-of-Retirement Process Enhancements. Issue Paper

Southern California Edison Company s Testimony on Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project (TRTP)

FERC Order 1000 Compliance Initiative. Straw Proposal (regional requirements), posted May 22, 2012

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S UNOPPOSED RESPONSE TO STAFF S COMMENTS

Exhibit A Affidavit of Alan Varvis

ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INTERCONNECTION AND PARALLEL OPERATION AGREEMENT FOR DISTRIBUTED GENERATION RATED 2 MW AND LESS

Section 24 COGENERATION AND SMALL POWER PRODUCTION

Stakeholder Comments Template

Electricity (Development of Small Power Projects) GN. No. 77 (contd.) THE ELECTRICITY ACT (CAP.131) RULES. (Made under sections 18(5), 45 and 46))

1 st Revision of Sheet No. 62 Canceling Original WN U-60 of Sheet No. 62

New Mexico Public Regulation Commission P. O. Box Paseo de Peralta Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504

EASTERN ILLINI ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE REGULATION NO. 27. SUBJECT: Interconnection and Parallel Operation of Distribution Generation

Transcription:

Table of Contents 25. Interconnection of Generating Units and Facilities... 2 25.1 Applicability... 2 25.1.1 Interconnection Request and Generating Unit Requirements... 2 25.1.2 Affidavit Requirements... 2 25.2 Interconnection to the Distribution System... 4 25.3 Maintenance of Encumbrances... 4 25.4 Asynchronous Generating Facilities... 5 25.4.1 Asynchronous Generating Facilities-Reactive Power... 5 25.5 Modifications to Generating Facilities... 6 25.5.1... 6 25.5.2... 6 25.5.3... 7 1

25. Interconnection of Generating Units and Facilities 25.1 Applicability This and Appendix U (the Standard Large Generator Interconnection Procedures (LGIP)), Appendix Y (the Generator Interconnection Procedures (GIP)), Appendix S (the Small Generator Interconnection Procedures (SGIP)), or Appendix W, as applicable, shall apply to: (a) (b) each new Generating Unit that seeks to interconnect to the CAISO Controlled Grid; each existing Generating Unit connected to the CAISO Controlled Grid that will be modified with a resulting increase in the total capability of the power plant; (c) each Generating Unit connected to the CAISO Controlled Grid that will be modified without increasing the total capability of the power plan but has change the electrical characteristics of the power plant such that its re-energization may violate Applicable Reliability Criteria. (d) each existing Generating Unit connected to the CAISO Controlled Grid whose total Generation was previously sold to a Participating TO or on-site customer but whose Generation, or any portion thereof, will now be sold in the wholesale market, subject to.1.2; and (e) each existing Generating Unit that is a Qualifying Facility and that is converting to a Participating Generator without repowering or reconfiguring the existing Generating Unit, subject to.1.2. 25.1.1 Interconnection Request and Generating Unit Requirements The owner of a Generating Unit described in.1 (a), (b), or (c), or its designee, shall be an Interconnection Customer required to submit an Interconnection Request and comply with Appendix DD. 25.1.2 Affidavit Requirements If the owner of a Generating Unit described in.1(d), or its designee, represents that the total generating capability and electrical characteristics of the Generating Unit will be substantially unchanged, then that entity must submit an affidavit to the CAISO and the applicable Participating TO representing that the total generating capability and electrical characteristics of the Generating Unit have remained substantially unchanged. However, if there is any change to the total generating capability and electrical 2

characteristics of the Generating Unit, the affidavit shall include supporting information describing any such changes and a $10,000 deposit for the study. The CAISO, in coordination with the applicable Participating TO, will evaluate whether the total generating capability or electrical characteristics of the Generating Unit have substantially changed or will substantially change. The CAISO may engage the services of the applicable Participating TO in conducting such verification activities. Costs incurred by the CAISO and Participating TO (if any) shall be borne by the party making the request under.1.2, and such costs shall be included in a CAISO invoice for verification activities. 25.1.2.1 If the CAISO and the applicable Participating TO confirm that the electrical characteristics are substantially unchanged, then that request will not be placed into the interconnection queue. However, the owner of the Generating Unit, or its designee, will be required to execute a Standard Large Generator Interconnection Agreement in accordance with Section 11 of Appendix U (the LGIP), a Large Generator Interconnection Agreement in accordance with Section 11 of Appendix Y (the GIP), a Small Generator Interconnection Agreement in accordance with Section 3.3.4, 3.4.5, or 3.5.7 and Section 4.8 of the SGIP, or an interconnection agreement in accordance with Appendix W, as applicable. 25.1.2.2 If the CAISO and the applicable Participating TO cannot confirm that the total capability and electrical characteristics are and will be substantially unchanged, then the owner of the Generating Unit, or its designee, shall be an Interconnection Customer required to submit an Interconnection Request and comply with Appendix U (the LGIP), Appendix Y (the GIP), Appendix S (the SGIP), or Appendix W, as applicable. 25.1.2.3 Upon receipt of the affidavit, the complete technical data, and the deposit, the CAISO will issue a draft study plan to the Generating Unit owner within ten (10) Business Days. Upon receipt of an executed study plan the CAISO will commence the study. The CAISO will complete the study within ninety (90) calendar days from the date the CAISO receives the signed study plan. If the CAISO cannot complete the study within that time period, the CAISO shall notify the Generating Unit owner and provide an estimated completion date and an explanation of the reasons why additional time is required. The CAISO will issue a final study report to the Generating Unit owner upon completion of the study. Any and all costs of the study shall be borne by the Generating Unit owner requesting the study. 25.1.2.4 The Generating Unit owner will be responsible for the actual costs incurred by the CAISO and 3

applicable Participating TO(s) in conducting the study. If the actual costs of the study are less than the deposit provided by the Generating Unit owner, the Generating Unit owner will be refunded the balance. If the actual costs of the study are greater than the deposit provided by the Generating Unit owner, the Generating Unit owner shall pay the balance within thirty (30) days of being invoiced by the CAISO. The Participating TO(s) shall invoice the CAISO for any study work within seventy-five (75) calendar days of completion of the study, and, within thirty (30) days of payment of the Participating TO(s) invoice, the CAISO shall issue an invoice or refund to the Generating Unit owner, as applicable, based upon such submitted Participating TO invoices and the CAISO s costs for the study. 25.2 Interconnection to the Distribution System Any proposed interconnection by the owner of a planned Generating Unit, or its designee, to connect that Generating Unit to a Distribution System of a Participating TO will be processed, as applicable, pursuant to the Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff or CPUC Rule 21, or other Local Regulatory Authority requirements, if applicable, of the Participating TO; provided, however, that the owner of the planned Generating Unit, or its designee, shall be required to mitigate any adverse impact on reliability of the CAISO Controlled Grid consistent with Appendix U (the Standard Large Generator Interconnection Procedures) and Appendix Y (the GIP). In addition, each Participating TO will provide to the CAISO a copy of the system impact study used to determine the impact of a planned Generating Unit on the Distribution System and the CAISO Controlled Grid pursuant to a request to interconnect under the applicable Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff or CPUC Rule 21, or other Local Regulatory Authority requirements, if applicable. 25.3 Maintenance of Encumbrances No new Generating Unit shall adversely affect the ability of the applicable Participating TO to honor its Encumbrances existing as of the time an Interconnection Customer submits its Interconnection Request to the CAISO. The applicable Participating TO, in consultation with the CAISO, shall identify any such adverse effect on its Encumbrances in the Interconnection System Impact Study performed under Section 7 of Appendix U (the LGIP), the Phase I Interconnection Study performed under Section 6 of Appendix Y (the GIP), the system impact study performed under Section 3.4 of the SGIP, or the System Impact Study performed under Section 5.1 of Appendix W, as applicable. To the extent the applicable Participating TO 4

determines that the connection of the new Generating Unit will have an adverse effect on Encumbrances, the Interconnection Customer shall mitigate such adverse effect. 25.4 Asynchronous Generating Facilities Asynchronous Generating Facilities that are the subject of Interconnection Requests in a serial study queue and for which a Large Generator Interconnection Agreement has not been executed or tendered for signature as of July 2, 2010 shall be subject to the Large Generator Interconnection Agreement set forth in Appendix BB. Asynchronous Generating Facilities that are the subject of Interconnection Requests in a Queue Cluster Window and for which a Large Generator Interconnection Agreement has not been executed or tendered for signature as of July 3, 2010 shall be subject to the Large Generator Interconnection Agreement set forth in Appendix CC. Asynchronous Generating Facilities that have been or should have been tendered a Large Generator Interconnection Agreement as of July 3, 2010 shall be subject to the Large Generator Interconnection Agreement set forth in Appendix Z. 25.4.1 Asynchronous Generating Facilities-Reactive Power The reactive power requirements set forth in FERC s Order No. 827 will apply to: 1) the entirety of an existing Asynchronous Generating Facility in the event such Generating Facility makes modifications that require the submission of a new Interconnection Request, and a subsequent Interconnection Study finds that the reactive power requirement is necessary to ensure system safety or reliability; 2) new Asynchronous Electric Generating Units, when an existing Generating Facility replaces Electric Generating Units with new Asynchronous Electric Generating Units, whether or not submission of a new Interconnection Request is required. Under these requirements, the Asynchronous Electric Generating Facility or Asynchronous Electric Generating Unit, as applicable, will maintain a composite power delivery at continuous rated power output at the high-side of the generator substation at a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, unless the CAISO has established a different power factor range that applies to all Asynchronous Generating Facilities on a comparable basis. This power factor range standard shall be dynamic and can be met using, for example, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors or reactors, or a combination of the two. After, an existing Asynchronous Generating Facility making upgrades to its 5

Generating Unit(s) through the Fast Track Process will maintain a composite power delivery at continuous rated power output at the high-side of the generator substation at a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, unless the CAISO has established a different power factor range that applies to all Asynchronous Generating Facilities on a comparable basis. This power factor range standard shall be dynamic and can be met using, for example, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors or reactors, or a combination of the two. 25.5 Modifications to Generating Facilities Pursuant to Article 5.19 of the Large Generator Interconnection Agreement set forth in Appendices V, BB, CC, and EE, or Article 1.3.4 of the Small Generator Interconnection Agreement set forth in Appendices T and FF, Generating Facilities may make modifications to their Generating Facilities where the CAISO and the Participating TO are notified at least ninety (90) calendar days in advance of commencement of work and sufficient information is provided such that the CAISO and the Participating TO(s) have determined that.1 does not apply to the modification. 25.5.1 Prior to making any modification after the Generating Facility s Commercial Operation Date, the Generating Unit owner must first request that the CAISO evaluate whether.1 would apply to the modification. In response to the Generating Unit owner's request, the CAISO, in coordination with the affected Participating TO, will evaluate the proposed modification. The CAISO may engage the services of the applicable Participating TO to assess the modification. The CAISO will inform the Generating Unit owner in writing whether.1 would apply to the modification and therefore be denied. Costs incurred by the Participating TO and the CAISO (if any) shall be borne by the party making the request under.5, and such costs shall be included in any CAISO invoice for modification assessment activities. 25.5.2 The Generating Unit owner will provide the CAISO a $10,000 deposit for the modification assessment at the time the request is submitted. Except as provided below, any modification assessment will be concluded, and a response provided to the Generating Unit owner in writing, within forty-five (45) 6

calendar days from the date the CAISO receives all of the following: the Generating Unit owner s written notice to modify the project, technical data required to assess the request, and payment of the $10,000 deposit. If the modification assessment cannot be completed within that time period, the CAISO will notify the Generating Unit owner and provide an estimated completion date and an explanation of the reasons why additional time is required. 25.5.3 The Generating Unit owner will be responsible for the actual costs incurred by the CAISO and applicable Participating TO(s) in conducting the modification assessment. If the actual costs of the modification assessment are less than the deposit provided by the Generating Unit owner, the Generating Unit owner will be refunded the balance. If the actual costs of the modification assessment are greater than the deposit provided by the Generating Unit owner, the Generating Unit owner will pay the balance within thirty (30) days of being invoiced. The CAISO will coordinate the modification request with the Participating TO(s). The Participating TO(s) will invoice the CAISO for any assessment work within seventy-five (75) calendar days of completion of the assessment, and, within thirty (30) days of payment of the Participating TO(s) invoice, the CAISO will issue an invoice or refund to the Generating Unit owner, as applicable, based upon such submitted Participating TO invoices and the CAISO s own costs for the assessment. 7