Texas Cities Debt Summary

Similar documents
Local Government Annual Report

Texas Bond Review Board

Dealing with Organizational Legacy Costs. Presented by City Manager Sheryl Sculley City of San Antonio, Texas

Salvador Contreras University of Texas Rio Grande Valley January 27, Research Assistants: Jacob Almaguer Ruth Cano Ivan Vazquez

Texas Taxpayers and Research Association

FY2018 Council Budget Work Session. August 17, 2017

The widening gap between home price and household

NORTH TEXAS ECONOMY Emily Kerr Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas October 19, 2017

FY 2017 COUNCIL BUDGET WORK SESSION AUGUST 25, 2016

Type A and Type B Economic Development Corporations and City Councils. Charles E. Zech Denton Navarro Rocha Bernal & Zech, P.C.

DRAFT UTP November Update - Funding Adjustments Summary EXHIBIT A REVISION DATE 11/7/14. (Amounts in millions) Sum $0

A History of. Property Taxes in

... TEXPERS. The Texas Association of Public Employee Retirement Systems

TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES ANNOUNCES OPERATING RESULTS FOR Q1 2007

Payday Lending. City Council Meeting September 1, 2015

Contribution and Benefit Decision-Making for Texas Public Retirement Systems

2017 Bond Program Development Possible Revision to Financial Management Performance Criteria. Budget, Finance, & Audit Committee June 20, 2016

... TEXPERS. The Texas Association of Public Employee Retirement Systems

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

City of Pasadena Annual Local Debt Report As of 9/30/2017

THE TEXAS RECOVERY PLAN

Construction Spending, Labor & Materials Outlook

Texas Economic Growth and Volatility

Hearing on Temporary Rates. EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 48

Selected Economic Data for Texas Cooperative Extension, Central Texas District (8)

SIFMA FACT SHEET. Build America Bonds. Statistics 3Q 09

2005 SECC Higher Education

Municipal Bonds in the Lone Star State

Denton County, Texas. Budget in Brief. Denton County Budget Office 401 W. Hickory, Suite #609 Denton, TX 76201

OCTOBER 2013 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

Presentation to. Town of Fairview. Council Meeting March 7, 2017

Stats Shed Light on Lawyer's Top E-Filing Complaints

THE SERIES 2015 BONDS ARE NOT DESIGNATED AS "QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS" FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Decomposing Regional Variation in Publicly Funded Newborn Care

Legislative Session Wrap up: Payday and Auto title Lending in Texas

STATE OF TEXAS CAPITAL EXPENDITURE PLAN

DEBT SERVICE GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT. Introduction. Credit Rating

Halting the Loss of Billions of Dollars in Earned Income Tax Credit Benefits in Texas April 2008

Overview of the Homestead Exemption Increase (SJR 1 and SB 1, 84 th Legislature)

Garrett C. Groves Economic Opportunity Program Director Easy Wind Drive, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78752

BROWNSVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT DEBT TRANSPARENCY AS OF JUNE 30, 2017

FY Budget Update

Public Retirement System Issues and Trends

Debt Affordability Study

TEXAS FACILITIES COMMISSION REQUESTED OPERATING BUDGET - FY 2018

Town of Fairview. Council Meeting March 1, 2016

CITY OF CAPE CORAL ANNUAL DEBT AND CREDIT REPORT

Texas Mid-Year Economic Outlook: The Skies are Beginning to Clear Keith Phillips Assistant Vice President and Senior Economist

Texas Association of County Auditors

Texas Delinquent Tax Case Law Review 2017 (Cases current through September 1, 2017)

Texas Economic Outlook: Tapping on the Brakes

November 7, 2017 $18,000,000 Capital Improvements Bond. Public Information Forum

CRS State Profile: Texas

FY 2015 TTUS Combined Annual Financial Report

Finance Committee Presentation Financing of the Courthouse and Jail Expansion. October 7 th, 2009

North East Independent School District Debt-Related Disclosures Required by Texas Local Government Code As of June 30, 2017

North East Independent School District Debt-Related Disclosures Required by Texas Local Government Code As of June 30, 2016

L EGISLATIVE A PPROPRIATIONS R EQUEST F ISCAL Y EARS 2014 AND 2015 T HE U NIVERSITY OF T EXAS S YSTEM A VAILABLE U NIVERSITY F UND

Debt Affordability Study

HIGH AND WIDE: INCOME INEQUALITY GAP IN THE DISTRICT ONE OF BIGGEST IN THE U.S. By Wes Rivers

IMAGINE ONE AUSTIN. City of Austin Budget 101. July 7, 2014

FORM G-37. Name of Regulated Entity: SAMCO CAPITAL MARKETS, INC. Report Period: Third Quarter of 2016

Austin Police Association Cost of Living & Compensation Analysis. August 17, 2018

Request for Qualifications (Outside Counsel September 1, 2012 to August 31, 2015) (RFQ No )

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE

WeaverViews. Duncanville Independent School District

Town of East Greenwich. Overview of Municipal Bonds

L E G I S L A T I V E A P P R O P R I A T I O N S REQUEST F I S C A L Y E A R S 2016 A N D 2017

2016 Texas Economic Outlook: Riding the Energy Roller Coaster Keith Phillips Assistant Vice President and Senior Economist

Austin Independent School District

Tarrant County s Outstanding Debt

ACI NA FINANCE SEMINAR CURRENT MUNICIPAL MARKET UPDATE

2016 Knowledge Is Power Conference Saturday 16, A wholly owned subsidiary of

ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT. Texas Mobility Fund. A Governmental Fund of the Texas Department of Transportation (With Independent Auditor s Report)

TEXAS PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY (TX-PACE) FINANCING: 101

STATE OF TEXAS CAPITAL EXPENDITURE PLAN. Texas Bond Review Board. For Fiscal Years September 1, 2008

Important Information about Investing in Municipal Bonds

~; dh'{ppem~fju-vfiv'"' Chief Financial Officer

County Auditor s Conference. May 4, Regional Disaster Finance Program

DEBT SERVICE GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT. Introduction. Credit Rating

County of El Paso, Texas Statistical Section For the Year Ended September 30, 2014

FORM G-37. Name of Regulated Entity: FTN Financial Capital Markets. Report Period: Third Quarter of 2017

Texas Public Finance Authority - General Obligation (GO) Bond Debt Service Summary of Recommendations - Senate Historical Funding Levels (Millions)

AUSTIN: MOVING FORWARD

TEXAS METROPOLITAN MOBILITY PLAN: FUNDING NEW OPPORTUNITIES

Request for Qualifications (Outside Counsel September 1, 2015 to August 31, 2017) (RFQ No )

Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC): A Major Financial Benefit to Low Income Families

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F T E X A S S Y S T E M

L E G I S L A T I V E A P P R O P R I A T I O N S REQUEST F I S C A L Y E A R S 2020 A N D 2021

FINANCIAL PLAN BUDGET TRENDS IN FY

MARCH 2015 REPORT OF THE. and. provides the DCE. Fund. Transportation. or about March. Dulles Tolll Road. Staff and.

Project The Texas 5 Portfolio includes the following three (3) properties listed in the table below. Property City County Units

Decisions as of. Senate Finance Committee Senator Whitmire, Chair. Members: Senators Hinojosa, Estes, Huffman, Patrick Decision Document

Debt Service Fund Overview

2014 U.S. Census (2015) Median African-American Household Income Rank, Memphis Included. Household Median Income Ranking, African American Population

Blue Medicare Advantage HMO SM

Summary: San Benito, Texas; General Obligation

These tariff sheets have an effective date of July 2, 2013.

BOARD POLICY NO. 036 SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DEBT POLICY

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM

Transcription:

Texas Cities Debt Summary Quick Facts FY 2009 Number of Issuers 224 Number of Bond Issues 393 Total New Money Issued 5,012,273,054 Total Refunding Money Issued $3,211,729,106 Total Par Amount Issued $8,224,002,160 FY 20100 Biennial Total 254 356 481 874 $4,751,510,,981 $9,763,784,035 $3,405,019,,997 $6,616,749,103 $8,156,530,,978 $16,380,533,138 BOND ISSUES FOR FISCAL YEARS 2009 & 2010 Bond issuance by Texas cities in FY 2010 decreased from FY 2009 ($8.16 billion vs. $8.22 billion, respectively). Of the total debt issued in FY 2010, 41.7% was for refunding outstanding prior bonds or converting short-term commercial paper notes to long-term bonds, an increase compared to 39.1% of the total in fiscal 2009. Refunding transactions during fiscal years 2009 and 2010 resulted in total cash savings of $291.6 million and a $225.7 million net present value savings. In fiscal years 2009 and 2010, 356 Texas cities completed 874 financing transactions and borrowed $16.38 billion dollars. Of the 874 financing transactions, 721 totaling $9.29 billion were backed by taxes, 150 totaling $7.05 billion were backed by revenue, and 3 totaling $38.9 million were backed by sales tax revenue. During fiscal years 2009 and 2010, twelve cities issued Build America Bonds totaling $1.82 billion. Build America Bonds (BAB) weree created from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in February 2009 which could be issued as Tax Credit BABs or Direct-Payment BABs. Tax Credit BABs provided a federal subsidy

to investors equal to 35% of the interest payable by the issuer, and Direct-Payment BABs provided a direct federal subsidy payment to state and local governmental issuers equal to 35% of the interest payable. Authority to issue either type of BABs expired on December 31, 2010. The largest long-term bond transactions were: FY 2009 -- Houston s $ 476,050,000 Combination Utility System First Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2009A were used to improve the Utility System and refund Combination Utility System First Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2008D-2 and Commercial Paper Notes Series A. FY 2010 -- Houston s Public Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 2009A for $430.9 million and Build America Bonds Direct Subsidy Taxable Series 2009B for $76.8 million were issued at the same time for a total par amount of $507.7 million. Series 2009A refunded partial amounts of GO Commercial Paper Note Series E, G, H-1, H-2 and tax supported Series 1999A, 2000A, 2001A and 2002. Series 2009B refunded partial amounts of GO Commercial Paper Note Series E, G, and H-2. COMMERCIAL PAPER Commercial paper is a short-term financing tool with a maximum maturity of 270 days and is used by some governmental entities. It is normally issued at the first stage of financing projects and is then either rolled over or fixed out by issuing longterm bonds to retire the outstanding commercial paper. During fiscal year 2009, Dallas established a new waterworks and sewer system revenue note program in February 2009 not to exceed $300 million to fund improvements to the city s waterworks and sewer system. In FY 2010, Houston created a new GO note program not to exceed $125 million. Also, Houston created a new combined utility system note program not to exceed $700 million. Ten Texas cities utilize either general obligation and/or revenue commercial paper programs to interim fund infrastructure improvements, additions and extensions. As of August 31, 2010, eight of these cities had $1.69 billion in commercial paper outstanding. Houston had the largest amount outstanding at $692.3 million. Commercial Paper Outstanding Texas Cities Principal as of 8/31/10 Government County Tax-Supported (GO) CP Notes Rev-Supported CP Notes Total Houston Harris 393,000,000 299,300,000 692,300,000 San Antonio Bexar 0 585,420,000 585,420,000 Austin Travis/Williamson * 281,053,000 281,053,000 Dallas Dallas * 58,000,000 58,000,000 Garland Dallas 30,000,000 * 30,000,000 Arlington Tarrant 17,200,000 0 17,200,000 Brownsville Cameron * 15,000,000 15,000,000 El Paso El Paso 0 9,000,000 9,000,000 Corpus Christi Nueces * 0 - Fort Worth Tarrant 0 * - Total $440,200,000 $1,247,773,000 $1,687,973,000 *City does not have a CP program in this category.

TOTAL DEBT OUTSTANDING AS OF AUGUST 31, 2010 As of August 31, 2010, Texas cities had $61.13 billion in general obligation and revenue debt outstanding (including $1.69 billion commercial paper and $15.1 million in lease purchases). This is an increase of $2.68 billion or 4.6% over FY 2009. Repayment of debt in a timely manner is one municipal performance indicator used by rating agencies to assess financial performance. A payment schedule that retires 25% of principal in five years and 50% in ten years is considered average or adequate. Texas cities will repay $8 billion (30.3%) in principal outstanding of tax-supporteyears. debt within five years and $15.37 billion (58.2%) within ten Revenue debt principal repayment is 17.9% ($6.22 billion) within five years and 37.5% ($13.02 billion) within ten years. This below average repayment indicator has remained relatively the same over the past five years. Note: Repayment calculations do not include commercial paper outstanding or conduit financings.

DEBT FOR THE BIG SIX The majority of the debt is held by the six largest Texas cities (The Big Six): Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Austin, El Paso, and Fort Worth. The Big Six hold $38.02 billion or 62.2% of the total GO (tax-supported) and revenue debt outstanding. City Debt - Principal Outstanding Government Tax Revenue Houston San Antonio Dallas Austin Fort Worth El Paso SUBTOTAL $3,422,431,768 1,305,255,000 1,969,009,913 1,114,764,994 685,505,000 832,460,000 $9,329,426,675 $9,292,515,532 7,795,662,412 4,476,608,000 4,070,091,405 2,225,012,000 832,460,000 $28,692,349,349 Other Cities 17,064,831,456 6,027,243,189 TOTAL $26,394,258,131 $34,719,592,538 Source: Texas Bond Review Board Total Combined $12,714,947,299 $9,100,917,412 $6,445,617,913 $5,184,856,400 $2,910,517,000 $1,664,920,000 $38,021,776,023 23,092,074,645 $61,113,850,668 Of the total debt outstanding for The Big Six, Houston s $12.71 billion accounts for 33.4%. The three largest - Houston, San Antonio and Dallas - hold 74.3% of The Big Six debt. All but one of the cities in The Big Six had an increase in tax-supported (GO) debt since FY 2009: Fort Worth 22.6% %, San Antonio -13.5%, Houston 6.3% El Paso 5.9%,, and Austin - 5%. Dallas was the only city in The Big Six to decrease 1.9% since FY 2009.

Note: Population numbers used in the debt per capita calculations are from the July 1, 2009 estimates released December 2009 by the U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. In FY 2010, San Antonio had the highest debt per capita (tax and revenue combined) of the six largest Texas cities. FY 2010 was the first year in recent history when Austin did not have the highest debt per capita. This was largely due to $2.39 billion increase in San Antonio s outstanding tax and revenue debt (excluding conduit) since FY 2006. In the past five years, El Paso and San Antonioo had the two highest debt percentage increases 67.9% and 24.0%, respectively. Austin decreasedd by 2.4% and Fort Worth experienced a less than 1% declinee since FY 2006. Dallas continues to have the highest average tax-supported debt per capita ($1,515) of the Big Six as of August 31, 2010. Austin ranks second with $1,418; El Paso moved up to third with $1,342. Houston moved down to fourth with $1,339, followed by San Antonio with $950 and Fort Worth with $942 tax-supported debt per capita.