New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa to Bronxville NY's $5.2M GO Bonds

Similar documents
New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

New Issue: Moody's upgrades Edgewater, NJ's GO to Aa2: assigns MIG 1 to $15.4M in BANs

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Framingham, MA's $43.9M GO bonds, MIG 1 to $4.4M GO BANs

Rating Update: Moody's affirms Aa3 on Waukegan Park District, IL's GO debt

New Issue: Moody's revises Pittsburgh PA's outlook to positive; affirms A1

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Oak Creek, WI's $2.7M GO Bonds, Ser. 2014B

New Issue: Moody's assigns an underlying Aa1 rating to Alpine School District, UT's G.O. bonds

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Lubbock (City of), TX

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Ford County USD No. 443's (KS) GOs Series 2015-A and Series 2015-B

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Rating Update: Moody's upgrades Central Falls' (RI) GO rating to Ba3 from B1; outlook is stable

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Oak Creek, WI's $10M General Obligation Promissory Notes

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

Global Credit Research - 24 Feb 2012 ASSIGNS A2 RATING TO $24.6 MILLION G.O. BONDS, 2012 SERIES A & B

Westport (Town of) CT

Park District of La Grange, IL

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 rating to Topeka's (KS) $25M GO Temp Notes, Ser A; Aa3 to $9.8M GO Ser B and $5.0M GO Ser.

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Montgomery County, TX

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa rating to Livingston County's (MI) $2.4 million

Dallas County Community College District, TX

A1 underlying rating affects $10.97 million in outstanding parity debt, inclusive of the current sale UNDERLYING RATING

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa rating to the Village of Glenview's (IL) $18.6 million General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2012A

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades SURA Asset Management to Baa1; outlook stable

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Special Tax: Transportation-Related

City of Oak Creek, WI

Butler (Village of), WI

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa3 ratings to State of Connecticut G.O. Bonds; outlook is stable

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa1 rating to Hartford MDC's (CT) $58.9 million General Obligation Bonds, Issue of 2013, Series A & B; outlook is stable

Township of Nutley, NJ

Moody s Upgrades Montco s Outlook

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Volusia County School District (FL)

WILTON (TOWN OF) CT. Update to credit analysis. Credit strengths. » Affluent residential tax base. Credit challenges

Ci1r of' SACRAMENTO. O ffice of t he City Treasu rer. Russell Fehr~ City Treasurer ADDITIONAL (VOLUNTARY) DISCLOSURE RATING AFFIRMED

Huffman Independent School District, TX

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 rating to Tustin Unified School District (USD) School Facilities Improvement District's (SFID) (CA) GO Bonds

Columbia School District, MO

Celina Independent School District, TX

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

City of Mesquite, TX

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Hoover (City of), AL

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

Newport News (City of) VA

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

Newport News, VA. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Strong financial management. Credit Challenges. Below average demographics

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Prince William County, VA

St. Mary's County, MD

Montgomery County, TX

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aaa IFS rating of New York Life; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 27 Jul 2017

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Dell's CFR to Ba2; outlook stable

New Issue: Moody's assigns A3 to Xavier University, OH's $47.5M Ser. 2015C; outlook stable

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Oakland (City of), CA

Evanston (City of), IL

Edison (Township of) NJ

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa1 to $450M of Massachusetts GO bonds; outlook stable

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Grays Harbor County Public Utility District 1 (WA) electric revenue bonds

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades ratings of 15 European covered bonds following methodology update

Rating Update: Moody's upgrades Inglewood's, CA, issuer rating to A1 from A2; upgrades to Baa1 the city's lease revenue bonds and POBs

Global Credit Research - 06 Mar 2018

Weber School District, UT

Prince William County, VA

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades the ratings of MBIA group: National Public Finance Guarantee to A3 Global Credit Research - 21 May 2014

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to Wayne County Airport Auth. (MI) Series 2017 E senior lien revenue bonds

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

Taos Municipal School District 1, NM

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Peruvian banks

West Fargo Public School District No. 6, ND

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades AES Chivor's ratings to Baa3 from Ba1; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 30 May 2014

City of Oakland, CA. Update to Credit Analysis. CREDIT OPINION 19 April Summary

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

George W. Kuhn Drainage District (Oakland County), MI

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Suriname's issuer rating to B2 negative; concluding rating review Global Credit Research - 20 Feb 2018

Carroll (County of) MD

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

MooDY's. Regulatory Disclosures. Page 1 of5 INVESTORS SERVICE. Identifier: MDY:

Bernalillo Municipal School District 1 (Sandoval County), NM

New Rochelle City School District, NY

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

Findlay City School District, OH

Rio Rancho, NM. Credit Strengths. Sizeable and stable tax base. Healthy reserves. Manageable debt burden with rapid payout.

Findlay City School District, OH

Global Credit Research - 06 Mar 2014

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

Moody s Methodologies & Florida Update

Transcription:

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa to Bronxville NY's $5.2M GO Bonds Global Credit Research - 14 Aug 2014 Affirms Aaa affecting $12.2M of GO debt outstanding BRONXVILLE (VILLAGE OF) NY Cities (including Towns, Villages and Townships) NY Moody's Rating ISSUE RATING Public Improvement Refunding Serial Bonds, Series 2014A Aaa Sale Amount $5,165,000 Expected Sale Date 08/20/14 Rating Description General Obligation Moody's Outlook NOO Opinion NEW YORK, August 14, 2014 --Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aaa to the Village of Bronxville's (NY) $5.2 million Public Improvement Refunding Serial Bonds, Series 2014A. Concurrently, Moody's has affirmed the Aaa rating on $12.2 million in outstanding general obligation debt. The bonds are secured by a General Obligation pledge as limited by the Property Tax Cap - Legislation (Chapter 97 (Part A) of the Laws of the State of New York, 2011). Bond proceeds will refund the Series 2002 and Series 2005 bonds currently outstanding for an estimated net present value savings of $304,000, equal to 6.3% of refunded principal, with no extension of maturities. SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE The Aaa rating reflects the village's solid financial position with healthy reserve levels, stable and very affluent tax base, and low direct debt burden. STRENGTHS - Satisfactory financial flexibility due to healthy reserves - Wealthy tax base - Low direct debt burden CHALLENGES - Maintenance of favorable financial position amidst rising costs for salaries and employee benefits DETAILED CREDIT DISCUSSION SOLID FINANCIAL POSITION WITH HEALTHY RESERVES Bronxville's practice of conservative budgeting, careful management of reserves, and tight fiscal controls have contributed to five operating surpluses in the past six years and a healthy reserve position. Fiscal 2013 ended with a $647,000 operating surplus due to conservative budgeting of sales tax revenue and building permit fees. The surplus increased the total General Fund balance to $3.2 million, or a healthy 23% of revenues, which is in compliance with a policy to maintain the General Fund at 20%. The majority of this balance ($2.8 million or 19.8% of revenues) continues to remain unassigned. The 2014 fiscal year ended May 31 and management reports that

revenues came in above budgeted projections and another surplus is anticipated. The fiscal 2015 budget increased 3.4% due to rising costs for salaries and employee benefits and was balanced with a 2.87% tax levy increase and a $672,000 fund balance appropriation. The village derives the majority of its revenues from property taxes (57.7% of 2013 revenues) and maintains excellent collections with 100% collected on a current basis annually. Sales tax accounted for 8.6% of revenues. The largest expenditure is public safety (25.2% of 2013 expenditures), followed by employee benefits (23.2%), and general government (16.5%). MODEST GROWTH EXPECTED FOR AFFLUENT SUBURB IN WESTCHESTER COUNTY Moody's expects the village to remain a stable and affluent suburb given accessibility to a wide range of employment centers in the region, including New York City (rated Aa2 stable) located 15 miles to the south. Located in Westchester County (rated Aa1 stable), the village is primarily residential and has one third of its properties revalued every year which has helped limit exposure to tax appeals. The tax base experienced declines in fiscal 2010 through 2012 (0.4%, 7.8% and 3.2%, respectively), reflective of the housing market downturn. Full value was essentially flat in 2013 and increased 0.5% in 2014, and management reports that home prices have increased over 15% since the downturn. The village has one new residential project underway that will generate building permit fees and, upon completion, approximately $600,000 in annual tax revenue. The 110,000 square foot project, called The Kensington, will consist of 54 condo units priced at over $1 million and a 203 space indoor parking lot that can be used exclusively by the village. Management plans to sell annual parking permits to commuters and merchants, adding yet another source of revenue. The strength of the village's tax base is evident in socioeconomic indicators that are four times state and national medians, which are among the highest in Westchester County and the nation. The concentration of wealth is also reflected in the village's substantial $436,247 full value per capita (five times the national median) due to a very high end housing stock (2012 median home value of $913,900 million). DEBT POSITION WILL REMAIN MANAGEABLE Bronxville's debt position will remain manageable given the above average amortization of principal and limited near-term borrowing plans. The direct debt burden is a below average 0.5% of full valuation and increases to 1.9% when accounting for the village's pro rata share of overlapping county, town, and school district debt obligations. Debt service accounted for 9.7% of 2013 expenditures and principal amortization is above average (83.1% retired in 10 years). Officials plan to issue up to $7 million in debt to fund various capital projects through fiscal 2018. All debt is fixed rate and the village is not party to any derivative agreements. The village participates in the New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System and the New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System, two multi-employer, defined benefit retirement plans sponsored by the State of New York (rated Aa1 stable). The district's combined annual required contribution (ARC) for the plans was $1 million in fiscal 2013, or 7.4% of operating expenditures. The village's combined adjusted net pension liability, under Moody's methodology for adjusting reported pension data, is $11.5 million, or 0.86 times operating revenues. Moody's uses the adjusted net pension liability to improve comparability of reported pension liabilities. The adjustments are not intended to replace the village's reported liability information, but to improve comparability with other rated entities. We determined the village's share of liability for the state-run plans in proportion to its contributions to the plans. The OPEB liability is funded on a pay-as-you-go basis, and the village contributed $712,000 in fiscal 2013, representing 43% of its ARC. The total unfunded liability is $19.4 million as of June 1, 2012, the most recent valuation report. Total fixed costs for fiscal 2013, including pension, OPEB and debt service, represented $3 million, or an above average 22.5% of General Fund expenditures. WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO DOWN - Structurally imbalanced financial operations which result in multi-year draws on reserves and/or reduced liquidity - Significant erosion of the village's tax base KEY STATISTICS: 2014 Full Value: $2.8 billion 2014 Full Value Per Capita: $436,247

Median Family Income as % of US: 399.6% Fiscal 2013 General Fund balance as a % of Revenues: 23.0% 5-Year Dollar Change in Fund Balance as % of Revenues: 8.9% Fiscal 2013 Cash Balance as % of Revenues: 22.32% 5-Year Dollar Change in Cash Balance as % of Revenues: 6.2% Institutional Framework: A 5-Year Average Operating Revenues / Operating Expenditures: 1.0x Net Direct Debt as % of Full Value: 0.5% Net Direct Debt / Operating Revenues: 1.0x 3-Year Average of Moody's ANPL as % of Full Value: 0.2% 3-Year Average of Moody's ANPL / Operating Revenues: 0.7x The principal methodology used in this rating was US Local Government General Obligation Debt published in January 2014. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. REGULATORY DISCLOSURES For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com. Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review. Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating. Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating. Analysts Heather Guss Lead Analyst Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Valentina Gomez Additional Contact Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Contacts Journalists: (212) 553-0376 Research Clients: (212) 553-1653

Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 USA 2014 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATION") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDER MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s Publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy." For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services

For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for "retail clients" to make any investment decision based on MOODY'S credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.