SuperNOFA FY2012 Performance Measures Cheat Sheet

Similar documents
FY16 HUD CoC Program Consolidated Application Scoring Criteria Summary June 2016

HUD 2016 System Performance Measures Submission Recap. NYC Coalition on the Continuum of Care October 20, 2017

Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

FY Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

FY Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

Summary of 3 County CoC SPM Report Data

PSH Renewal Review & Scoring Document

Measure 1: Length of Time Persons Remain Homeless

Summary and Analysis of the Interim ESG Rule December 2011

Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Continuum of Care 2017 Renewal Project Performance Scorecard

2018 Performance Management Plan. Ohio Balance of State Continuum of Care Updated January 2018

Joint Office of Homeless Services FY 2018 Proposed Budget

Office of Community Planning and Development

SACRAMENTO HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM: DATA QUALITY PLAN

2017 Saratoga-North Country CoC Project Rank & Review Application

APR Requirements and Data Entry Workflow Review

Santa Barbara County HMIS Data Quality Plan

VHPD HMIS DATA: PROGRAM EXIT FORM

Continuum of Care Written Standards for NY- 508 Buffalo, Niagara Falls/Erie, Niagara, Orleans, Genesee, Wyoming Counties CoC

COC RANKING For Grant Year 2017

HMIS Data Standards: HMIS Data. Dictionary. Released May, 2014 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Volume 2

[HUDX-225] HMIS Data Quality Report Reference Tool

Network180 - FY17 1/12th Payments and Encounter Submission SUD ARB - Arbor Circle

EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG) FUNDING

Exit Form: Print on Light-Blue Paper

HMIS Data Standards DATA DICTIONARY

2017 HUD CoC Program Rating and Review Procedure

The Commitment Bonus requires a minimum four year written premium of $6,000,000 which includes the current year.

Before Starting the Exhibit 1 Continuum of Care (CoC) Application

DESTINATION Which of the following most closely matches where the client will be staying right after leaving this project?

HMIS Data Standards DATA DICTIONARY

TOOL OVERVIEW. FY2019 CoC Program Competition Renewal Project Scoring Tool

Toledo Lucas County Continuum of Care: 2016 Key Performance Indicators

HUD CoC Reviewing, Scoring and Ranking Procedure

CITY OF OAKLAND EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT DRAFT PY 2011 SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

HMIS REQUIRED UNIVERSAL DATA ELEMENTS

Santa Clara County Performance Measures - Updated July 1, June 30, 2019

Continuum of Care (CoC) and Emergency Solutions Grant Program (ESG) 2015 Policy Manual

The 2017 HUD CoC Annual Performance Report (CoC-APR) Training for the Ohio Balance of State and Mahoning CoCs

FY2017 CoC Program Competition Application Score Cards

The Role of HUD s Homeless and Mainstream Housing Programs in Ending Homelessness. Jennifer Ho Ann Marie Oliva Marcy Thompson

1A. Continuum of Care (CoC) Identification

FY2018 Chicago Continuum of Care (CoC) Ranking Policies and Final Ranking Listing. Developed by the Project Prioritization Workgroup

Santa Clara County Performance Measures - finalized July 1, June 30, 2017

Proposed San Francisco Response to Solicitation of Comment on Specific Issues For Emergency Solutions Grant Program Interim Rule

NY-606/Rockland County CoC Rank & Review - Attachments Checklist

Vulnerability Notification Form Telling us about your personal circumstances

REPORT. Amendments to Two San Diego Rapid Re-Housing Program Contracts

a. Standard policies and procedures for evaluating individuals and families eligibility for assistance under Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG).

NC ESG Application Form: Regional Application (January 1, 2017 December 31, 2017)

Tracey McDermott Interim Chief Financial Officer Financial Services Department

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Idaho Balance of State 10/1/2009-9/30/2010

FY2016 Detroit Continuum of Care (CoC) Funding Announcements Report to Detroit CoC Board January 9, 2017

Recommended Budget Hearings Fiscal Year

CONTRACTOR OBLIGATIONS

C2 GPS Innovation Lower Rio Tarrant County Capital Area South Texas Job Seeker

COMMSEC INTERNATIONAL EQUITIES FUNDS TRANSFERS MANUAL

2009 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR)

The Community Partnership How to Run the CoC-APR 2018 Report Version 1 Last Updated December 17, 2018

Administering CoC and ESG Rapid Re-housing Assistance

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY HOMELESS ACTION PARTNERSHIP

Homeless Management Information System (HMIS)

Standards for CoC- and ESG-Funded Rapid Re-Housing Programs in the Metropolitan Denver Continuum of Care

FY 2018 Budget Proposal Rundown

Blue Ridge Interagency Council on Homelessness

EASTERN PANHANDLE HOME CONSORTIUM HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM FUNDING APPLICATION

AGENDA. 1. Welcome and Introductions. 2. Review IRP Meeting Summary from Feb. 7, HUD CoC Program NOFA

Strategic Plan

SHELTER DIVERSION ServicePoint Handbook

October 24, 2017 CIS Training P R E SENT ED B Y G A I T HER STEPHENS

ServicePoint Handbook

How to Pull Your APR (Annual Performance Report) to Upload into Sage

Summary of Submitted 2015 Budget From Rates

Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. Fairfax County, Fairfax City and Falls Church Cities

Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. District of Columbia

Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. Arlington County

Emergency Solutions Grant Operations Manual

Project Application Part 7: Budget Information

11/15/2011. The Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Program: An Introductory Overview. Submitting Questions in the Webinar

Data Quality Plan Tampa / Hillsborough County Continuum of Care

GLOSSARY HMIS STANDARD REPORTING TERMINOLOGY. A reference guide for methods of selecting clients and data used commonly in HMIS-generated reports

HUD Notice Soliciting Comments on ESG Interim Rule National Alliance to End Homelessness Summary of Notice June 25, 2015

Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative 2016 CoC NOFA Evaluation Tool for Renewal Project Applications

Jeff Davis Executive Vice President and Chief of Staff. Tracey McDermott Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

HMIS PROGRAMMING SPECIFICATIONS

2018 Kentucky Balance of State CoC Expansion Project Scoresheet for RRH and PSH Projects (Approved by KY BoS CoC Advisory Board August 3, 2018)

APR Data: # of Clients: # of Households # of Adults # of Leavers: # of Adult Leavers:

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Tarrant County/Ft. Worth 10/1/2012-9/30/2013

CoC Annual Performance Report (APR) Guide

FY 2017 TX BoS CoC Review, Score, and Ranking Procedures and Reallocation Process for HUD Continuum of Care Program Funds

NOTES. Step 2: choose the correct city if 2 or more cities share the same ZIP Code.

Toledo Lucas County Continuum of Care: 2014 Key Performance Indicators

facilitated adviser charges This is an important document. Please keep it safe for future reference.

ONLINE EXPENSE TUTORIAL

Assigned Risk Rates and Rating Values for the Michigan Workers' Compensation Placement Facility (2013)

MYOB Exo Business White Paper

Don t fill in cents. Round off cents to the nearest dollar. For example, $99.49 becomes $99.00, and $99.50 becomes $

Updated 01/22/2019 ID 24, Page 1 of 5

Multi-Year Budget Planning. Stott Mason & Michael Hurlocker Prince William County

Five-year Financial Plan Orientation

Transcription:

SuperNOFA FY2012 Performance Measures Cheat Sheet For Permanent Supportive Housing, Shelter + Care, and Section 8 SRO Programs Universe Number = The total projected number of people to be served throughout the program year. Target Number = The Universe Number multiplied by the goal percentage for retention. Target 2-a and 2-b. The current continuum goal for permanent housing retention is 80%. Thus LAHSA recommends that you multiply your Universe Number by 0.80 to derive the Target Number, and round down the Target % is equal to or close to 80%. First you must determine if your program will prioritize increasing the income of all clients served over the age of 18 through employment and or benefits, or if it will work on increasing the income of those from ages 18-61 through employment income alone. You can only select one goal, and you should enter ZEROES in the goal you do not select. Note that if your program serves primarily youth under the age of 18, neither of these targets will apply, and if anything should both be filled out with zeroes. by the end of the program year OR the total number of people aged 18-61 projected to be served, if employment is the only projected income source.

For Transitional Housing Programs Universe Number = The total projected number of people leaving the program by the end of the program year. Target Number = The Universe Number multiplied by the goal percentage for permanent housing placement. Target 2-a and 2-b. The current continuum goal for permanent housing placement is 65%. Thus LAHSA recommends that you multiply your Universe Number by 0.65 to derive the Target Number, and round down the Target % is equal to or close to 65%. First you must determine if your program will prioritize increasing the income of all clients served over the age of 18 through employment and or benefits, or if it will work on increasing the income of those from ages 18-61 through employment income alone. You can only select one goal, and you should enter ZEROES in the goal you do not select. Note that if your program serves primarily youth under the age of 18, neither of these targets will apply, and if anything should both be filled out with zeroes. by the end of the program year OR the total number of people aged 18-61 projected to be served, if employment is the only projected income source.

For Safe Haven Programs NOTE: It is completely optional to provide performance targets for Safe Haven programs. However, LAHSA recommends utilizing the following guidelines: Target 2-a. Universe Number = The total projected number of people remaining in the program by the end of the program year. Target Number = The Universe Number multiplied by the goal percentage for retention. While there is no current continuum goal for Safe Haven retention, LAHSA recommends matching the goal set for permanent housing retention, which is 80%. Thus LAHSA recommends that you multiply your Universe Number by 0.80 to derive the Target Number, and round down the Target % is equal to or close to 80%. by the end of the program year.

For Street Outreach Programs Target 2. Universe Number = The total projected number of people leaving the program by the end of the program year. Target Number = The Universe Number multiplied by the goal percentage for housing placement, including placements into emergency shelter, transitional housing, safe havens or permanent housing. While there is no current continuum goal for housing placement overall, LAHSA recommends matching the goal set for permanent housing placement, which is 65%. Thus LAHSA recommends that you multiply your Universe Number by 0.65 to derive the Target Number, and round down the resulting value. You will know that you ve calculated this correctly if the esnaps calculated Target % is equal to or close to 65%. Universe Number = For each identified condition, the total number of people projected to be served that will exhibit that specific condition. Target Number = The Universe Number multiplied by the goal percentage for provision of services that will address each specific condition. While there is no current continuum goal for connecting those with specific conditions to services that will address that condition, LAHSA currently sets a goal for its providers of 35%. Thus LAHSA recommends that you multiply your Universe Number by 0.35 to derive the Target Number, and round down the resulting value. You will know that you ve calculated this correctly if the esnaps calculated Target % is equal to or close to 35%. For Supportive Services Only - Access Center Programs Because Access Centers are recognized by HUD as primarily Supportive Services Only (SSO) programs, the default structure for its performance targets mimics those of other SSO programs, in that it prioritizes permanent housing placement and income maintenance. However, LAHSA recommends that Access Centers indicate that they are SSO programs that do not have project activities related to housing goal, and instead manually provide targets that are similar to those for Street Outreach programs (listed above). For more information on how to provide these measures, please refer to the detailed Performance Measures instructions available from HUD at: https://esnaps.hudhre.info/files/performancemeasures_m085.pdf

For Supportive Service Only Programs with Housing-Related Goals Universe Number = The total projected number of people leaving the program for permanent housing PLUS the total projected number of people remaining in permanent housing at the end of the program year. Target Number = The Universe Number multiplied by the goal percentage for retention. Target 2-a and 2-b. The current continuum goal for permanent housing placement is 65%, and the current goal for permanent housing retention is 80%. Thus LAHSA recommends the following: -If your program primarily exits people into permanent housing, multiply your Universe Number by 0.65 to derive the Target Number, and round down the resulting value. You will know that you ve calculated this correctly if the esnaps calculated Target % is equal to or close to 65%. -If your program supports people currently residing in permanent housing, multiply your Universe Number by 0.80 to derive the Target Number, and round down the resulting value. You will know that you ve calculated this correctly if the esnaps calculated Target % is equal to or close to 80%. First you must determine if your program will prioritize increasing the income of all clients served over the age of 18 through employment and or benefits, or if it will work on increasing the income of those from ages 18-61 through employment income alone. You can only select one goal, and you should enter ZEROES in the goal you do not select. Note that if your program serves primarily youth under the age of 18, neither of these targets will apply, and if anything should both be filled out with zeroes. by the end of the program year OR the total number of people aged 18-61 projected to be served, if employment is the only projected income source.

For additional goals, and For Supportive Service Only Programs that do not have Housing-Related Goals LAHSA does not currently have any specific recommendations for targets outside of the HUD standard ones, but if your program chooses to add additional goals, they should most likely address the following areas: -Education -Employment retention -Life Skills If you have an SSO program that does not have any housing related-goals, you must manually establish at least one performance target. However, LAHSA highly recommends you instead elect to have housingrelated goals, as it is the continuum s overall priority to move people into permanent housing rapidly and effectively. For more detailed instructions on creating performance targets, please refer to the following HUD documents: FY2012 Project Application Detailed Instruction: https://esnaps.hudhre.info/files/cocapplicationdetailedinstructions.pdf esnaps Performance Measures Training Guide: https://esnaps.hudhre.info/files/performancemeasures_m085.pdf And if you have any other questions or concerns, please feel free to contact Michael Nailat, LAHSA Outcomes Unit Manager, at mnailat@lahsa.org, or at (213) 683-3346.