UW-STOUT Annual Operating Budget Process

Similar documents
New Mexico Highlands University Annual Operating Budget Process. approved Fall 2016

POLICY STATEMENT NO EFFECTIVE: February 15, 1986 PAGE: 1 of 3. REVISED: August 30, 2004

Office of the Academic Senate One Washington Square San Jose, California Fax:

UW-Platteville Pioneer Budget Model

New Campus Budget Model

POLICY RECOMMENDATION THE PLANNING AND BUDGET PROCESS AT SJSU

Budget Reform Update. Paul Ellinger, Associate Chancellor & Vice Provost Budget and Resource Planning

Carry Forward of Year End Funds

Resource Allocation, Management, and Planning Steering Committee #7

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROCESS

I. INTRODUCTION II. ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES

On behalf of the Resource Allocation Task Force (RATF), I am pleased to forward you our final report. Your charge to the RATF was:

SUMMARY OF KEY BUDGET MODEL ISSUES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS

Leadership Steering Committee Report

Planning and Budgeting Integration (PBI) Model

ANNUAL STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT AUGUST 21, 2012

Integrated Resource Planning Process University of Wisconsin-Parkside June 21, 2012

Fiscal Year 2019 Budget Listening Session - Updated

Adopting a Different Approach to University Budgeting February 10, 2016

Fiscal Year 2019 Budget Listening Session

Eastern Kentucky University

Vernon College Annual Planning Calendar Academic Year

Evaluation of Annual Action Plan (ongoing) and Institutional Effectiveness Plans Responsibility: Component Leadership

CCAC Comprehensive Planning, Budgeting & Assessment Process

Strategic Plan Design, Execution & Assessment to Meet Governing Board Priorities

NORTHWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY Budget Development. Budget Model

DEANS, VICE CHANCELLORS, UNIVERSITY LIBRARIAN, ATHLETIC DIRECTOR AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER

UNTHSC. Annual Budget Development Process Fiscal Year 2019 Guidelines & Instructions - Spring 2018

KAPI'OLANI CC OPERATIONAL POLICY

ASL Budget Forum. May 8, 2017

Evaluation of Annual Action Plan (ongoing) and Institutional Effectiveness Plans Responsibility: Component Leadership

IDENTIFICATION AR II /15/06 THE PLANNING, BUDGETING, AND ASSESSMENT CYCLE. Part 1. THE PLANNING, BUDGETING, AND ASSESSMENT CYCLE

South Orange County Community College District. District-wide Strategic Plan

Campus Budget Open Forum. October 5, 2017

Budget Model Refinement Discussion. October 2018

Introduction to the UND s New Budget Model

Campus Biennial Budget Meeting Tenth in a Series

CHARTER PLANNING COUNCIL

Competency Profile: A breakdown of the general areas of competencies into specific competency statements.

Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi

Peralta Planning and Budgeting Integration (PBI) Model. OVERVIEW (August 6, 2009)

University Budget Advisory Committee Composition

A 10 STANDING COMMITTEES. A. Academic and Student Affairs Committee. Activity Based Budgeting Update. For information only.

Budget Model Redesign Initiative

Budget Restructuring, Base Budgets and the Academic Plan

OAA Forum I: FY16 Budget and FY17 Budget Planning. November 18, 2015

q. PLANNING, RESOURCE, AND BUDGET COMMITTEE CURRENT

Annual Operating Budget Development Process. Presentation to the Board of Regents Finance Committee October 10, 2013

USF System Annual Strategic Budget Planning Process

As MGA develops as a university, increased formalization and change of the budget process is expected.

SOUTH SEATTLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE COUNCIL BYLAWS (Approved June 1998) PHILOSOPHY

The Institutional Effectiveness Process at SJU: From Unit Assessment to Institutional Decision Making. Wenjun Chi Shawn Krahmer

FY 2013 Budget Development Academic Budget Considerations

FAQs Finance and Budget Modeling Initiative

Fourth Report of the Budget Model Development Committee

CATEGORY 8 PLANNING CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

Resource Allocation Charter Document

Policy Development Checklist University Policies

BUDGET ALLOCATION PROCESS University Administrators Forum February 6, 2013

POLICY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK

Planning and Budgeting for. Assistant Vice President, Budget and Planning

USF SYSTEM ANNUAL STRATEGIC BUDGET PLANNING PROCESS OVERVIEW

OAA Forum III: FY16 OAA Budget. May 27, 2015

University Planning Phase 1. Organizational and Process Enhancements

Saddleback College Strategic Planning Process. Recommended by the Consultation Council, 6/16/09 Approved by the President, 6/23/09 Revised, 8/6/09

THE DEVELOPMENT AND ISSUANCE OF COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES. 4.1 Development and Issuance of College Administrative Policies

Senate Standing Committee on University Budget

FY18 Budget Summit Informational Meeting

BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Balancing Dalhousie s Operating Budget. Context for the Development of the Operating Budget REPORT LV

January 22, Budget Model Review and Implementation Committee

FY APPENDIX #1 - BUDGET IMPROVEMENT TARGET MEASUREMENT

Components of the Implementation Process

Summary of Revisions. The scope of and permissible timeframe for academic IFR programs have been expanded.

Administrative Procedures Integrated Planning and Budgeting (IPB) Model

Following the Money Trail From Austin to College Station

UMass Lowell A Strategic Plan for the Next Decade. Committee on Financial Planning & Budget Review Organizational Meeting

What is Responsibility Centered Management?

PLAN FOR ASSESSMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND STUDENT LEARNING

Biennium Open Budget Forum April 2009

Welcome to the Spring 2018 Budget Forum! Hosted by the President s Budget Advisory Committee

December 13, The Asia-Pacific Risk Management and Insurance Program

Planning and Budgeting Forum Mission Achievement Planning

DRAFT August 2, Overview of OSU New Education and General (or Shared Responsibility) Budget Model Academic Colleges Focus

1.103 Policy Development and Approval Process

Faculty Retirement Survey Executive Summary Faculty Retirement Work Group 1 - April 13, 2016

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Performance Fund* 4,414,100 Total $74,448,900

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about NKU s New Budget Model

The University of Winnipeg BUDGET OVERVIEW

Dean s RCM Workshops January 2015

Compensation Plan. McGovern Medical School. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Town Hall Meetings. Budget Update and Planning. May 6, 2009

Roger Williams University. Business Plan for Expansion or Initiation of an Academic or Support Program

FY 2011 BUDGET (MAY 5, 2010)

Washington State University General Guidelines for Establishing and Allocating Services and Activities Fees

Focus for the Future: A retrospective outsider view. John Wiencek

A New Academic Business Model for UMass Dartmouth

Budget Model Assessment

F96-4 THE BUDGET PROCESS AT SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY

Sequoias Community College District RESOURCE

Salt Lake Community College Informed Budget Process Final Report FY 2014

Transcription:

UW-STOUT Annual Operating Budget Process An institution s budget process is shaped by institutional character; institutional size; administrative sophistication; faculty governance structures and processes; the degree of centralization of decision-making authority; the amount of trust among administrators, faculty, and students; the openness of the budgetary process; and the demand for information. 1 At UW-Stout, the office of Budget, Planning and Analysis (BPA) will facilitate an appropriate budget process for this campus by achieving the following goals: Budget priorities are developed in a manner that facilitates planning; informed discussion; faculty, staff and student participation; and a proactive response to critical external and internal issues. The process encourages openness, trust and budget sophistication by providing feedback to identified groups at various designated points in the budget process. Efficiency and effectiveness of the budget process is increased by implementing procedures to achieve an on-line, paperless budget process at the college and major unit level. Divisions, colleges and major units are assisted in their development of summary information on budget decisions, reallocation decisions and budget actions to support budget objectives. UW-Stout values: Active campus involvement throughout the entire budget process; Collaborative relationships with each of the divisions, colleges and units at UW-Stout; Innovative budgeting ideas that diversify and broaden revenue sources and / or reduce operating expenses while still providing a high-quality learning and living environment for students and a high-quality work environment for faculty and staff; Open communication and availability of information on campus. To achieve these goals, the annual operating budget process at UW-Stout includes the following steps and processes, which are further outlined on the following pages: Strategic Planning Group (SPG) Retreat Summer Listening Sessions Fall Chancellor s Advisory Council (CAC) Budget Planning Fall/Winter Budget Planning at the Division / College Level Winter Chancellor Communicates Final Plan Institution-Wide Winter/Spring Please note the Strategic Planning Model addresses UW-Stout s Mission, Values, Vision, Situation Analysis, Enduing Goals, FOCUS 2010 Goals, Action Plans and Periodic Reviews. 1 Richard J. Meisinger, Jr., College & University Budgeting (National Association of College and University Business Officers, 1994), p.49

Strategic Planning Group Retreat Summer Purpose: To draft near-term university priorities, outline training and development needs, and target process improvement areas. Stakeholders: Strategic Planning Group plus additional resource people 2 BPA compiles information and data for the summer retreat binder, and reviews the information with the SPG members during the three months prior to the retreat. The information includes: o Campus Action Plans o Emerging Issues o Enrollment Management Data o Prior Year s University Priorities o Current Year s University Priorities o University-Wide Performance Data o Survey Data o Financial Information o Training & Development Plans o Process Improvement Plans

3 Fall Listening Sessions Fall Purpose: To encourage faculty, staff and students to engage in direct, unfiltered, unedited communication with university administration on the draft university priorities, training and development needs, and process improvement areas. Stakeholders: Faculty Senate (Executive Board, Senate Members, Individuals) Senate of Academic Staff (Executive Board, Senate Members, Individuals) Stout Student Association (Executive Board, Senate Members, Individuals) College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (Dean, Program Directors, College of Education, Health and Human Sciences (Deans, Program Directors, College of Management (Deans, Program Directors, Department Chairs, Individuals) College of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (Dean, Program Directors, Academic and Student Affairs (Provost, Associate Vice Chancellor, Dean, Directors, Individuals) Administrative and Student Life Services (Vice Chancellor, Assistant Vice Chancellor, Directors, Individuals) Chancellor s Office (Chancellor, Directors, Individuals) BPA summarizes the draft priorities on the University Priority templates. Information includes: o Defining the priority statement, which outlines the proposed solution; o Outlining the linkage to the University goals; o Stating the issue to be solved; o Listing the actions required to ensure the priority s success. This includes naming an individual responsible for the action and the timeline for completion of the specific action; o Estimating the resource requirements (employees, funding, etc.) needed for the priority to succeed; o Selecting information to be collected for up to six critical measures to benchmark the priorities success; o Naming a priority champion, to ensure the completion of the priority; o Estimating a completion date for the priority. SPG reviews / revises each of the priorities prior to the forums to ensure accuracy. BPA schedules nine focus groups for the campus to review each of the draft priorities. All faculty, staff and students are encouraged to participate and provide feedback on the draft priorities. BPA publishes draft priorities on the web site in advance of the focus groups for the campus to review.

4 BPA distributes copies of the draft priorities to attendees at each of the nine focus groups. CAC members present the priorities at the each of the nine focus groups. The attendees provide individualized feedback on draft priorities. Alternative methods for faculty, staff and students to provide feedback can be accomplished through the web, organizational structure, and governance representative.

Fall/Winter Chancellor s Advisory Council Budget Planning Fall/Winter Purpose: To finalize university priorities, recommend budget allocations, training and development needs, and process improvement areas. Stakeholders: Chancellor s Advisory Council 5 BPA estimates the amount of money available for the university priorities from the various sources of funds. The CAC recommends the monetary amount and any other resources to be allocated toward each priority and verify the sources of funding.

Winter Budget Planning at the Division / College Level Winter Purpose: To develop budgets at the division / college / unit level. Stakeholders: Faculty Senate (Executive Board, Senate Members, Individuals) Senate of Academic Staff (Executive Board, Senate Members, Individuals) Stout Student Association (Executive Board, Senate Members, Individuals) College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (Dean, Program Directors, College of Education, Health and Human Sciences (Deans, Program Directors, College of Management (Deans, Program Directors, Department Chairs, Individuals) College of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (Dean, Program Directors, Academic and Student Affairs (Provost, Associate Vice Chancellor, Dean, Directors, Individuals) Administrative and Student Life Services (Vice Chancellor, Assistant Vice Chancellor, Directors, Individuals) Chancellor s Office (Chancellor, Directors, Individuals) 6 The Chancellor will establish budget planning allocations at the division level. Complementary budget planning occurs simultaneously at the division / college / unit level. At this point, the specific budget detail is developed. Please note that UW- Stout utilizes incremental budgeting, not zero-based budgeting. BPA provides training and support to budgeters as they develop individual account budgets. BPA ensures that the budgets balance to targets at the college and major unit levels Divisions, colleges and major units provide summary information on budget decisions, reallocation decisions, and budget actions to support budget objectives. Timetables on the specific steps in the entire budget process are developed each year by BPA

Chancellor Communicates Final Plan Institution-Wide Winter/Spring Purpose: To communicate final decisions on university priorities and resource allocations to the campus. Stakeholders: Faculty Senate (Executive Board, Senate Members, Individuals) Senate of Academic Staff (Executive Board, Senate Members, Individuals) Stout Student Association (Executive Board, Senate Members, Individuals) College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (Dean, Program Directors, College of Education, Health and Human Sciences (Deans, Program Directors, College of Management (Deans, Program Directors, Department Chairs, Individuals) College of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (Dean, Program Directors, Academic and Student Affairs (Provost, Associate Vice Chancellor, Dean, Directors, Individuals) Administrative and Student Life Services (Vice Chancellor, Assistant Vice Chancellor, Directors, Individuals) Chancellor s Office (Chancellor, Directors, Individuals) 7 BPA develops a presentation for the Chancellor that summarizes the final decisions on university priorities, resource allocations and budget actions to support budget objectives. The Chancellor conducts two forums where budget information is presented to administrators, program directors, department chairs, directors, faculty, staff and students. Material is disseminated to the campus (Redbook, etc)