Analyst Conference on Solvency II

Similar documents
Life under Solvency II Be prepared!

Business Plan of Triglav Group for 2018

EIOPA s first set of advice to the European Commission on specific items in the Solvency II Delegated Regulation

Solvency II: Implementation Challenges & Experiences Learned

Undertaking-specific parameters (USPs)

The Solvency II project and the work of CEIOPS

Solvency and financial condition report 2017

Hot Topic: Understanding the implications of QIS5

AVIVA Solvency and Financial Condition Report ( SFCR )

RISK BASED CAPITAL AND SOLVENCY

The Review of Solvency II. 01/02/2018 Hans De Cuyper, President of Assuralia

Introductory Speech. The Solvency II Review: What happens next? Conference on "The review of Solvency II organised by the National Bank of Belgium

Solvency II Insights for North American Insurers. CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014

Solvency II Implementation

Solvency and Financial Condition Report (SFCR)

An Introduction to Solvency II

Results of the QIS5 Report

Solvency and financial condition report Standard Life Assurance Limited

Society of Actuaries in Ireland Solvency II for Beginners. Mike Frazer. 19 May 2011

Financial & Solvency II update. 26 May 2016 Huub Arendse Leiden

Introduction to Solvency II SCR Standard Formula for Market Risk. Erik Thoren 11 June 2015

12 April 2018 Kurt Svoboda, CFRO. UNIQA Insurance Group AG Economic Capital and Embedded Value 2017

Understanding the prudential balance sheet. Lars Dieckhoff Principal expert Solvency II

Solvency Assessment and Management (SAM)

DISCLOSURE QRT REPORT Proteq Levensverzekeringen 2017

21 April 2017 Kurt Svoboda, CFRO. UNIQA Insurance Group AG Economic Capital and Embedded Value 2016

(Text with EEA relevance)

Solvency II, messages and findings from QIS 5. Carlos Montalvo Rebuelta Executive Director Brussels, 7 March 2011

Understanding the prudential balance sheet. Lars Dieckhoff Principal expert Solvency II

Solvency & Financial Condition Report Group Executive Summary

2016 Public Quantitative Reporting Templates Solvency II Aegon Spaarkas N.V.

Solvency II Update. Latest developments and industry challenges (Session 10) Réjean Besner

UNIQA Insurance Group AG. Group Economic Capital Report 2017

S Solvency Capital Requirement for groups using the standard formula and partial internal model

Technical Specification on the Long Term Guarantee Assessment (Part I)

The internal and external reporting

PRA Solvency II update James Orr. 29 April 2015

AFM NED Conference Solvency II Business as Usual. Steve Dixon of SDA llp

Solvency II. New Rules in Europe for the Insurance Industry. Lecture at UConn Law, January 28, 2013

2.1 Pursuant to article 18D of the Act, an authorised undertaking shall, except where otherwise provided for, value:

Triglav Group. Investor Presentation Preliminary Results

Update on Solvency Assessment and Management ( SAM ) Presenter: Andre Jansen van Vuuren

Western Captive Insurance Company DAC. Solvency and Financial Condition Report. For Financial Year Ending 31 st December 2016 (the reporting period )

Solvency II Conference. Two years on and two reviews

2016 Public Quantitative Reporting Templates Solvency II Aegon Levensverzekering N.V.

Triglav Group H Results Presentation. August 2017


Table of content Disclosure QRT's Proteq Levensverzekeringen NV

Technical Specifications part II on the Long-Term Guarantee Assessment Final version

Technical Specification for the Preparatory Phase (Part I)

User Guide for Input Spreadsheet Long-Term Guarantees Assessment

TRIGLAV GROUP INVESTOR PRESENTATION. Mr. Benjamin Jošar, Member of the Management Board. April 2014

Christina Urias SMI Task Force Chair Director, Arizona Department of Insurance

Financial Assurance Company Limited

Direct Line Insurance Group plc, U K Insurance Limited and Churchill Insurance Company Limited

Solvency II Update. Craig McCulloch

Annex I S Balance sheet Solvency II value Assets

N.V. Hagelunie. Openbaar te maken QRT's

ADRIA REGION HOME MARKETS OF THE TRIGLAV GROUP


Quantitave reporting templates Appendix SFCR Leven. jij, je pensioen en

2017 Public Quantitative Reporting Templates Solvency II Aegon Levensverzekering N.V.

SOLVENCY II Level 2 Implementing Measures

Consultation Paper on the draft proposal for Guidelines on reporting and public disclosure

General terms. Bonds and savings These are accumulation products with single or regular premiums and unit-linked or guaranteed investment returns.

DNB Livsforsikring AS Pillar 3. A company in the DNB Group

Triglav Group. Investor Presentation. March 2015

S Balance sheet Solvency II value

ORSA: A relevant part of the governance system within Solvency II

s Solvency Capital Requirement for undertakings on Standard Formula

10 April 2019 Kurt Svoboda, CFRO. UNIQA Insurance Group AG Economic Capital and Embedded Value 2018

(Text with EEA relevance)

TYRE REINSURANCE (IRELAND) DAC. Solvency and Financial Condition Report. For Financial Year Ending 31 st December 2016 (the reporting period )

[Photodisc]/Thinkstock. Solutions for Solvency II

Solvency and Financial Condition. Global Dental Insurance, 2017

Suncorp Group Limited ABN

Risk and investment management

5 S Calculation of Solvency Capital Requirement

Regulatory Developments in Europe

For personal use only. Suncorp Group Limited ABN Analyst Pack

Financial Insurance Company Limited

Framework for a New Standard Approach to Setting Capital Requirements. Joint Committee of OSFI, AMF, and Assuris

What do you know about Solvency II? High-level introduction for interested parties from Non-EU regions February 2013

OHRA Ziektekostenverzekeringen N.V.

SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT EUROLIFE LTD

Solvency II. Insurance and Pensions Unit, European Commission

Sampo Group Risk Management Principles. 9 May 2018

Delta Lloyd Zorgverzekering N.V.

PRA RULEBOOK: SOLVENCY II FIRMS: GROUP SUPERVISION INSTRUMENT 2015

S Balance sheet. in EUR. Solvency II value

Compromise proposal on Omnibus II

SOLVENCY ADVISORY COMMITTEE QUÉBEC CHARTERED LIFE INSURERS

User Guide for Input Spreadsheet QIS on IORPs

Using Reinsurance to Optimise the Solvency Position in an Insurance Company

Practical Actuaries and Financial reporting system: Thailand. Joint Regional Seminar Bangkok. July by Soon Chooi Ong FSA, FIAA

Verslag inzake de Solvabiliteit en de Financiële Toestand bedragen in duizenden. DSW Ziektekostenverzekeringen N.V.

EN ANNEX II INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE DISCLOSURE OF AGGREGATE STATISTICAL DATA

Appointed Actuary Symposium 2007 Solvency II Update

We referred to ICP 20 which deals with public disclosures and is therefore directly comparable to the SFCR.

Solvency II. Yannis Pitaras IACPM Brussels, 15 May 2009

Transcription:

Triglav Group Analyst Conference on Solvency II June 2018

Triglav Group in 2018 Solvency II Disclosure 2017 Outlook 2

Triglav Group in 2018

Highlights in 2018 Q1 2018 Performance: Good results in the insurance business, lower net interest income as expected. Q1 2018 Comment GWP 292.6 m 4% growth PBT 27.5m Up by 8% CoR non-life 88.5% Favourable Dividend for 2017 paid in the amount of 2.5 gross per share (82% dividend payout) Triglav Group to enter pension insurance market in Croatia Capital management policy and dividend policy revised in March 2018 2017 SFCR: Triglav Group is financially strong, well capitalised and carefully managed 4

Revised Methodology in 2017 SCR calculation still based on Standard formula without simplification Revised methodology for capital adequacy calculation: A. Change in the methodology for the calculation of the adjustment for the loss absorbing capacity of deferred taxes resulting in the increase of SCR B. Different treatment of ring-fenced funds in capital adequacy calculation resulting in the increase of SCR and EOF, both by the same amount 5

A. Adjustment for Loss Absorbing Capacity of Deferred Taxes Adjustment for the effect of potencial tax loss in case of 1/200 event decreasing SCR Methodology change implemented at year-end 2017 is based on more conservative estimate of the amount of the adjustment Adjustment used is the one that can be justified using net deferred tax liabilities from the balance sheet for SII estimated prudently based on professional judgement Reasons for change in methodology: - EIOPA analyses showed a different approaches used across EU and announced changes with Standard formula recalibration - Changes of the regulation could increase the Group s regulatory/ business risk due to material impact on capital adequacy Adjustments at the Group level - weighted average of adjustments of the Group's insurance undertakings, i.e. subject to the equity stake of an individual company. The calculation also takes into account the average effect of diversification between Group members. 6

B. Different Treatment of Ring-Fenced Funds in million Capital Adeqacy of Triglav Group 31 Dec 2017 31 Dec 2016 31 Dec 2016* Total EOF to meet SCR 878 855 844 Total EOF to meet MCR 878 855 844 SCR excluding ring-fenced funds 0 0 343 SCR with ring-fenced funds 395 354 0 Min consolid. capital requirement 149 141 141 Capital adequacy to SCR 222% 242% 246% Capital adequacy to MCR 587% 607% 599% In 2016 (*) EOF and SCR do not include value of ring-fenced funds results disclosed in SFCR 2016 In new methodology is the value of ring-fenced funds included in EOF and SCR results disclosed in SFCR 2017 7

Capital Adequacy of Triglav Group > 250% Surplus capital adequacy 200-250% Target capital adequacy 150-200% Sub-optimum level of capital adequacy 130-150% Warning level of capital adequacy < 130% Insufficient capital adequacy Possibility of a more aggressive growth of business volume, assessment of potential changes in the business strategy Regular performance of risk management activities Analyzing possible medium and long-term measures to improve capital adequacy and emphasized monitoring of risks Implementation of measures to improve capital adequacy 31 Dec 2017 31 Dec 2016* Solvency ratio 222% 242% More conservative approach for calculation of the adjustment for the loss absorbing capacity of deferred taxes caused the decrease of the solvency ratio. *Based on methodology before its revision in 2017 8

60,0 50,0 40,0 30,0 20,0 10,0 0,0 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5 0 Revised Dividend Policy Atractive and Sustainable The minimum dividend pay-out is set to 50% of consolidated net profit for the previous year, however Zavarovalnica Triglav will strive not to reduce its dividend payment below the level of the previous year. As thus far, the future implementation of the dividend policy will be subordinated to achieving the medium-term sustainable target capital adequacy of Triglav Group. The proposal of the Management Board and the Supervisory Board as regards the annual distribution of accumulated profit of the Company will therefore take into account the following three objectives in a balanced manner: to ensure prudent capital management of Triglav Group and its financial stability, to reinvest net profit in the implementation of the strategy of growth and development of Triglav Group and to pay out attractive dividends to the shareholders. 0.4 0.7 2.0 1.7 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 9.1 15.9 45.5 38.6 56.8 56.8 56.8 56.8 Total dividends (in m) Gross DPS (in ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 9

Solvency II Disclosure 2017

Efficient Risk Management System of Triglav Group Management Board Supervisory Board and Audited Committee Competent Risk Management Committees All business at all levels Non-Life Ins. Development and Actuarial Dept. Life Dept. Actuarial Dept. Risk Management Department Complience Office Internal Audit Dept. All employees within the scope of their competences and powers FIRST LINE of defence: Risk Underwriting SECOND LINE of defence: Risk Management THIRD LINE of defence: Independent Control 11

Capital Management Centralised at Group level (capital concentration at the parent company) The objective is an efficient use of available capital, which provides for: - safety and profitability of operations at the Group level; - a high level of confidence of all stakeholders; - meeting the regulatory capital adequacy requirements; - achievement of an appropriate capital adequacy level in the ORSA process; - meeting the criteria of external rating agencies to maintain at least the A credit rating. Optimal performance and capital structure 12

Capital Adequacy of Triglav Group (as of 31 Dec 2017, in million) IFRS Balance Sheet Equity 757 Assets 3,675 Liabilities 2,918 Solvency II Balance sheet Assets 3,225 EAL* 925 Eligible own funds (EOF) 878 (Subordinated liabilities 18) Restricted own funds items 65 Liabilities Solvency ratio = EOF SCR = 878 395 = 222% (Future forseeable dividends 57, Other adjustments 8) Surplus 483 SCR 395 2,300 * EAL Excess of assets over liabilities 13

Valuation for Solvency Purposes IFRS/Solvency II: Different valuation methods at the level of individual company: 744-206 - Technical provisions -202 +789 - DAC and intangible assets valuated at zero - Receivables not yet due are decreasing technical provisions (future premiums) and are deduced from receivables on assets side - Financial assets valuated at quoted market prices or best approximation of market value Different consolidation method 14

Eligible Own Funds (31 Dec 2017) IFRS/Solvency II: Different valuation of assets and liabilities in million 757-231 -206-11 -79 744-202 -33 629-42 -3-62 +789 925 18-57 -8 878 15

Quality of EOF to Meet SCR 878 855 860 835 in million 18 20 0 0 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 Total Tier 1 (without restrictions) Tier 2* Tier 3 * Tier 2 own funds are eligible to cover the minimum capital requirement until they exceed 20% of the minimum capital requirement 16

Solvency II Standard Formula Capital Requirement Market risk Underwriting non-life and health insurance risk Underwriting life risk Capital weights (on exposure) Interest rate Subject to ALM Listed EEA/ OECD 41% Equity Unlisted EEA/OECD 51% Property 25% Credit spread risk Government bonds EEA countries: 0% Non-government bonds & other credit instruments: Various % based on type of instrument, duration and credit rating Currency 25% Premium and reserve risk based on net earned premium and net claim reserves CAT risk based on sum insured exposure Based on specific models 17

SCR Overview - Standard Formula 394.8 Total SCR In million SCR for companies from other fin.sector 15.8 6.4 SCR for other undertakings 372.5 Con.SCR -35.8 376.1 32.2 Adj BSCR* Op 245.1 57.7 49.3 56.3 149.3 0 Market* Health* Default* Life* Non-life Intang Interest rate* SLT Health* CAT* Non-SLT Health Mortality* Premium Reserve Equity* Mortality* Premium Reserve Longevity* Lapse Property* Longevity* Lapse Disability Morbidity* CAT Spread* Disability Morbidity* Lapse* Currency* Concentration* Lapse* Expenses* Revision* Expenses* Revision* CAT* *Included in the adjustment for the loss absorbing capacity of technical provisions under the modular approach 18

Solvency Capital Requirement of Triglav Group (31 Dec 2017) 263-181 in million 32 5-1 -40 16 6 50 245 395 19

Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) Split by Risk 2017 8% 5% 3% 1% 43% 2016 7% 5% 3% 2% 41% 40% 42% Underwriting risk Market risk Credit risk Operational risk Risk of companies from other financial sectors Risk of other companies Undiversified value of capital requirement for accepted risks of Triglav Group using the Standard formula 20

Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) Split by Risk 2 Underwriting risk; 43% Market risk; 40% 8%5% Spread risk Property risk Equity risk Currency risk Interest rate risk Concentration risk 16% 15% 10% 9% 6%% 43% Underwriting risk Market risk Credit risk Operational risk Risk of companies from other financial sectors Risk of other companies Risk profile for non-life and health insurance Premium and reserve risk 64% Catastrophe risk 24% Lapse risk 12% Risk profile for life insurance Expense risk Lapse risk Longevity risk Mortality risk Catastrophe risk Revision risk Disability-morbidity risk 16% 9% 6% 2% 0% 35% 32% 21

Key Takeaways Triglav Group is stable and well capitalized Market and underwriting risk account for 83% of Group s capital requirements Virtually all capital is Tier 1 eligible Careful management of capital with aim to increase value of the Group Risk management system adequately involved in corporate governance structure 22

Outlook

Strategy 2017-2020 Our MISSION is BUILDING A SAFER FUTURE for all our stakeholders, while being committed to responsible and sustainable development. Our VISION: To dynamically develop new ways of doing business as the foundation of the Group s responsible long-term development, while at the same time operating profitably and safely. Five strategic guidelines: 1. Profitable operations and greater value of the Group 2. Efficient asset management 3. Comprehensive client relationships 4. Transformation of operations 5. Development of a modern culture and dedicated staff Our values: Safety, Responsibility, Professionalism, Simplicity, Modernity 24

Outlook 2018 In 2018 the Group s operations will continue to be financially sound and profitable, while maintaining the Group s strong financial stability and capital adequacy. In million 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Outlook 2018 GWP 989 936 901 888 919 936 1,000 Above 1,000 Profit before tax 58 90 84 100 102 95 84 80-90 CoR non-life 90.1% 89.6% 91.0% 96.3% 92.8% 92.9% 93.9% Around 95% Insurance: Sales activities with strong focus on customers' needs and well adapted to individual markets. Further gradual growth of the share of premium collected in markets outside Slovenia. Projected gross operating expenses affected by higher insurance acquisition costs and by higher depreciation of property, plant and equipment as a result of large past and future IT investments. Asset management: Increase of volume of AUM from non-compulsory saving. Effective management of assets at the level of the whole Group. Actively pursuing opportunities arising from the consolidation of the AM industry in the region. Investment policy and expected return on investments: Maintaining relatively conservative policy. Some activities will continue to focus on capacity building for investing in alternative investment classes and strategies. Lower return on investment (excluding the return on unitlinked life insurance assets) than in the previous year. 25

Financial Calendar 2018 of Triglav Group Planned date* Type of announcement Silent period** Monday, 5 March 2018 Preliminary key figures 2017 From Monday, 12 February 2018 Friday, 30 March 2018 Audited annual report for 2017 From Friday, 16 March 2018 Thursday, 26 April 2018 Convocation Notice of the General Meeting of Shareholders which will decide on the distribution of accumulated profit Wednesday, 16 May 2018 January March 2018 Interim Report From Wednesday, 2 May 2018 Tuesday, 29 May 2018 Wednesday, 13 June 2018 Thursday, 14 June 2018 General Meeting of Shareholders and notice of its resolutions Dividend shareholders' record date Date of dividend payment to Central Securities Clearing Corporation Friday, 17 August 2018 January June 2018 Interim Report From Friday, 3 August 2018 Thurday, 15 November 2018 January September 2018 Interim Report From Friday, 2 November 2018 * Announcement dates as planned. The actual dates may differ from the above stated planned dates. ** The silent period denotes a period preceding the announcement of the Company/Group report, during which Zavarovalnica Triglav does not disclose information on current operations to the public. Any amendments to the provisional dates of publication will be published on the Ljubljana Stock Exchange's website via the SEOnet system at http://seonet.ljse.si and on the Company's website at www.triglav.eu. Thank you. 26

Disclaimer The information, statements or data contained herein has been prepared by Triglav Corporate officers. Zavarovalnica Triglav, d.d., or any member of Triglav Group, or any Zavarovalnica Triglav employee or representative accepts no responsibility for the information, statements or data contained herein or omitted here from, and will not be liable to any third party for any reason whatsoever relating to the information, statements or data contained herein or omitted here from. Such information, statements or data may not be prepared according to the same standards and requirements than the information, statements or data included in Triglav s own reports and press releases are prepared to, and accordingly the level of information and materiality and nature of the disclosures may be different. Undue reliance should not be placed on the information, statements or data contained herein because they are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties and can be affected by other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such information, statements or data. Moreover, the information, statements and data contained herein have not been, and will not be, updated or supplemented with new or additional information, statements or data. 27