HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Similar documents
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

9.46 NAZARETH BOROUGH

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

9.11 BUSHKILL TOWNSHIP

9.36 HANOVER TOWNSHIP

9.51 PLAINFIELD TOWNSHIP

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

9.48 NORTHAMPTON BOROUGH

9.42 LOWER MT. BETHEL TOWNSHIP

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

9.24 WEISENBERG TOWNSHIP

9.8 FOUNTAIN HILL BOROUGH

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

9.15 MACUNGIE BOROUGH

9.29 THE CITY OF BETHLEHEM

9.2 ALBURTIS BOROUGH. This section presents the jurisdictional annex for Alburtis Borough. A. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT

9.11 BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP

9.10 HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP

9.4 CATASAUQUA BOROUGH

9.3 CITY OF ALLENTOWN

9.33 THE CITY OF EASTON

9.35 VILLAGE OF TULLY

6. MITIGATION STRATEGY. 62 municipalities have devised. 1,161 actions designed to prepare the Lehigh Valley for disaster.

9.22 UPPER SAUCON TOWNSHIP

9.8 Borough of Far Hills

CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT

9.3 VILLAGE OF DOBBS FERRY

Chapter 7 Appendix B: National Flood Insurance Program Summary for Kaua'i County, 2015 Update

Sources of FEMA Funding

This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of Chenango.

9.25 TOWN OF ONONDAGA

9.23 VILLAGE OF WHITNEY POINT

9.12 VILLAGE OF FABIUS

9.20 VILLAGE OF MANLIUS

9.36 TOWN OF VAN BUREN

9.2 VILLAGE OF ARDSLEY

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

9.25 VILLAGE OF WINDSOR

9.4 VILLAGE OF CAMILLUS

9.2 TOWN OF BARKER. This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of Barker. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT.

9.14 TOWN OF LISLE. This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of Lisle. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT.

Section 9.8: Town of Florida 9.8 Town of Florida Hazard Mitigation Plan Point of Contact Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

9.15 VILLAGE OF JORDAN

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

9.28 Village of New Berlin

9.36 TOWN OF VAN BUREN

SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Warren County Planning Workshop (2 nd Meeting) March 7, 2007

T-318. Hazard Mitigation Section TDEM Recovery, Mitigation, and Standards

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS) Together North Jersey Resilient Task Force Meeting

9.21 TOWN OF MARCELLUS

Village of Blue Mounds Annex

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

A.) HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT

9.17 Town of Pharsalia

9.9 TOWN OF DICKINSON

According to the U.S. Census, the 2010 population for the Town was 803.

According to the U.S. Census, the 2010 population for the Town was 4,024.

9.15 Town of Otselic Hazard Mitigation Plan Point of Contact Municipal Profile. Population. Location.

9.1 LEHIGH AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTIES

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

9.24 TOWNSHIP OF WALPACK

Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Kankakee County, Illinois Executive Summary

9.14 TOWN OF GREENWICH

Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. Executive Summary

This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of Geddes.

9.15 VILLAGE OF JORDAN

ROI for Joining CRS. Floodplain Management Association Conference. Sacramento, CA. September 2016

9.31 Village of Smyrna

SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES

C APABILITY A SSESSMENT

City of Sea Isle City Department of Construction and Zoning Physical Location: 4501 Park Road (rear entrance)

Transcription:

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT troseberry@easton-pa.gov cmanges@easton-pa.gov MUNICIPAL PROFILE

MUNICIPAL PARTICIPATION

Compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Identify source of information, if different Topic from the one listed 1. Staff Resources Is the Community Floodplain Administrator (FPA) or NFIP Coordinator certified? Community FPA No Is floodplain management an auxiliary function? Community FPA No Provide an explanation of NFIP administration services (e.g., permit review, GIS, education or outreach, inspections, engineering capability) What are the barriers to running an effective NFIP program in the community, if any? 2. Compliance History Community FPA Community FPA Additional Comments Zoning application review, GIS None Is the community in good standing with the NFIP? State NFIP Coordinator, FEMA NFIP Specialist, or community records Yes Are there any outstanding compliance issues (i.e. current violations)? When was the most recent Community Assistance Visits (CAV) or Community Assistance Contact (CAC)? Is a CAV or CAC scheduled or needed? 3. Regulation When did the community enter the NFIP? NFIP Community Status Book 10/17/1978 Are the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) digital or paper? How are residents assisted with mapping? Community FPA Digital 2014 Do floodplain regulations meet or exceed FEMA or Yes, updated floodplain ordinance based on Community FPA State minimum requirements? If so, in what ways? FEMA regulations. Floodplain application has to be submitted. Includes an evacuation procedure and how a Describe the permitting process. Community FPA, State, FEMA NFIP flood event or warning is monitored. Any new development is inspected to make sure of floodplain compliance. No?? No

Compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) (continued) Topic 4. Insurance Summary How many NFIP policies are in the community? What is the total premium and coverage? How many claims have been paid in the community? What is the total amount of paid claims? How many substantial damage claims have there been? How many structures are exposed to flood risk within the community? Describe any areas of flood risk with limited NFIP policy coverage. 5. Community Rating System (CRS) Identify source of information, if different from the one listed State NFIP Coordinator or FEMA NFIP Specialist FEMA NFIP or Insurance Specialist 41 110 Community FPA or GIS Analyst 208 Community FPA or FEMA Insurance Specialist None Additional Comments Does the community participate in CRS? Community FPA, State, or FEMA NFIP No If so, what is the community's CRS Class Ranking? What categories and activities provide CRS points and how can the Class be improved? Does the plan include CRS planning requirements? Flood Insurance Manual (http://www.fema.gov/floodinsurancemanual.gov) Community FPA, FEMA CRS Coordinator, or ISO representative

COMMUNITY ASSETS

COMMUNITY ASSETS (continued)

COMMUNITY ASSETS (continued)

Capability Assessment Capability In Place Status Date Adopted or Updated Under Development Department/ Agency Effect on Hazard Loss Reduction: - Supports - Neutral - Hinders Change since 2013 Plan? + Positive - Negative Has the 2013 Hazard Plan been integrated into the Regulatory Tool/Program? If so, how? How can these capabilities be expanded and improved to reduce risk? Additional Comments Comprehensive Plan 2017 Zoning Supports Positive waterfront corridors provide information on appropriate design in flood zones 1. Regulatory Regulatory/Tool/Program Capital Improvement Plan Finance Economic Development Economic Plan Development Continuity of Operations Administration Plan Stormwater Management Plan/Ordinance Zoning Open Space Management Plan (or Parks/Rec or Zoning Greenways Plan) Natural Resource Protection Plan Transportation Plan Zoning Zoning

Capability Assessment (continued) Capability 1. Regulatory Regulatory/Tool/Program Status Date Adopted or Updated Under Development In Place Department/ Agency Historic Preservation Plan Zoning Floodplain Management Plan Zoning Farmland Preservation Evacuation Plan Police Disaster Recovery Plan Emergency Management Hazard Plan 2013 Emergency Operations Plan Zoning Regulations Floodplain Regulations 2014 NFIP Participation Zoning Emergency Management Zoning Zoning Zoning Building Code Codes Fire Code Codes Other Effect on Hazard Loss Reduction: - Supports - Neutral - Hinders Change since 2013 Plan? + Positive - Negative Has the 2013 Hazard Plan been integrated into the Regulatory Tool/Program? If so, how? How can these capabilities be expanded and improved to reduce risk? Additional Comments

Capability Assessment (continued) Capability 2. Administration & Technology Staff/Personnel Resources 3. Financial Resources Planners (with land use/land development knowledge) Planners or engineers (with natural and/or humancaused hazards knowledge) Yes No Department/Agency Zoning Zoning/Engineering Engineers or professionals trained in building and/or construction practices (includes Codes and Fire building inspectors) Emergency manager Fire & Planning Floodplain administrator/manager Zoning Land surveyors Staff familiar with the hazards of the community All Departments Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and/or FEMA's HAZUS program Zoning Grant writers or fiscal staff to handle large/complex grants All Departments Other Capital improvement programming Finance & Administration Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Zoning Special purpose taxes Finance & Administration Gas/electric utility fees Finance & Administration Water/sewer fees Finance & Administration Stormwater utility fees Finance & Administration Development impact fees Finance & Administration General obligation, revenue, and/or special tax bonds Finance & Administration Partnering arrangements or intergovernmental agreements Administration Other Change since 2013 Hazard Plan? How can these capabilities be expanded and improved to reduce risk? Additional Comments

Capability Assessment (continued) Capability 4. Education & Outreach Program/Organization Change since the 2013 Hazard Yes No Department/ Agency Plan? Firewise Communities Certification StormReady Certification Natural disaster or safety-related school programs Fire New program Ongoing public education or information program (e.g., responsible water use, fire safety, household Fire New program preparedness, environmental education) Public-private partnership initiatives addressing disaster-related issues citizen groups or non-profit organizations focused on environmental protection, emergency preparedness, access and functional needs populations, etc. Other Capability Assessment (continued) Nurture Nature New program for Environmental Education How can these capabilities be expanded and improved to reduce risk? They are studying City vulnerability. Additional Comments Capability Area Degree of Capability Change since the 2013 Limited Moderate Hazard Plan? If so, how? Additional Comments 5. Self-Assessment Planning and Regulatory Administrative and Technical Financial Education and Outreach

Known Or Anticipated Future Development/Redevelopment Development/ Property Name Type of Development Number of Structures Location Known Hazard Zone Description/Status Natural Hazard Event History Specific To Easton City Type of Event and Date FEMA Disaster # (if applicable) Damage and Losses

2013 Municipal Action Plan Status Status No Progress/ Unknown Action (from 2013 Hazard Plan) 1 Dam removals from Bushkill Creek In Progress Continuous Completed Discontinued Additional Comments 2 Retrofit structures located in hazard-prone areas to protect structures from future damage, with repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss properties as priority. Phase 1: Identify appropriate candidates for retrofitting based on costeffectiveness versus relocation. Phase 2: Where retrofitting is determined to be a viable option, work with property owners toward implementation of that action based on available funding from FEMA and local match availability. 3 4 Purchase, or relocate structures located in hazard-prone areas to protect structures from future damage, with repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss properties as priority. Phase 1: Identify appropriate candidates for relocation based on costeffectiveness versus retrofitting. Phase 2: Where relocation is determined to be a viable option, work with property owners toward implementation of that action based on available funding from FEMA and local match availability. Maintain compliance with and good-standing in the NFIP, including adoption and enforcement of floodplain management requirements (e.g., regulating all new and substantially improved construction in Special Hazard Flood Areas), floodplain identification and mapping, and flood insurance outreach to the community. Further, continue to meet and/or exceed the minimum NFIP standards and criteria through the following NFIP-related continued compliance actions identified below.

2013 Municipal Action Plan Status (continued) Status 5 6 7 8 Action (from 2013 Hazard Plan) Conduct and facilitate community and public education and outreach for residents and businesses to include, but not be limited to, the following to promote and effect natural hazard risk reduction: Provide and maintain links to the HMP website, and regularly post notices on the County/municipal homepage(s) referencing the HMP webpages. Prepare and distribute informational letters to flood vulnerable property owners and neighborhood associations, explaining the availability of mitigation grant funding to mitigate their properties, and instructing them on how they can learn more and implement mitigation. Use email notification systems and newsletters to better educate the public on flood insurance, the availability of mitigation grant funding, and personal natural hazard risk reduction measures. Work with neighborhood associations, civic and business groups to disseminate information on flood insurance and the availability of mitigation grant funding. Begin the process to adopt higher regulatory standards to manage flood risk (i.e. increased freeboard, cumulative substantial damage/improvements) and sinkhole risk (e.g., carbonate bedrock standards). Determine if a Community Assistance Visit (CAV) or Community Assistance Contact (CAC) is needed, and schedule if needed. Have designated NFIP Floodplain Administrator (FPA) become a Certified Floodplain Manager through the ASFPM, and pursue relevant continuing education training such as FEMA Benefit-Cost Analysis. No Progress/ Unknown In Progress Continuous Completed Discontinued Additional Comments 9 Participate in the Community Rating System (CRS) to further manage flood risk and reduce flood insurance premiums for NFIP policyholders. This shall start with the submission to FEMA- DHS of a Letter of Intent to join CRS, followed by the completion and submission of an application to the program once the community s current compliance with the NFIP is established. 10 Archive elevation certificates

2013 Municipal Action Plan Status (continued) Status 11 12 13 14 15 Action (from 2013 Hazard Plan) Continue to support the implementation, monitoring, maintenance, and updating of this Plan, as defined in Section 7.0 Complete the ongoing updates of the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans Create/enhance/maintain mutual aid agreements with neighboring communities for continuity of operations. Identify and develop agreements with entities that can provide support with FEMA/PEMA paperwork after disasters; qualified damage assessment personnel Improve post-disaster capabilities damage assessment; FEMA/PEMA paperwork compilation, submissions, recordkeeping Work with regional agencies (i.e. County and PEMA) to help develop damage assessment capabilities at the local level through such things as training programs, certification of qualified individuals (e.g., code officials, floodplain managers, engineers). No Progress/ Unknown In Progress Continuous Completed Discontinued Additional Comments Notes: 1) Actions not carried through to the 2018 Action Plan are so noted. 2) To maintain National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance, actions related to the NFIP were carried through to the 2018 Action Plan even if identified by the municipality as completed.

2018 Action Plan Action 1 Dam removals from Bushkill Creek 2 3 Retrofit structures located in hazard-prone areas to protect structures from future damage, with repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss properties as priority. Specifically identified are the following: - Movement of mechanicals to floors above flood elevations - Strict enforcement of statewide building codes - Flood notifications - Post flood assessments Phase 1: Identify appropriate candidates for retrofitting based on cost-effectiveness versus relocation. Phase 2: Where retrofitting is determined to be a viable option, work with property owners toward implementation of that action based on available funding from FEMA and local match availability. Purchase, or relocate structures located in hazard-prone areas to protect structures from future damage, with repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss properties as priority. Specifically identified are the following: - Purchase properties by eminent domain - Acquire blighted properties - Prevent inappropriate redevelopment through zoning and codes Phase 1: Identify appropriate candidates for relocation based on cost-effectiveness versus retrofitting. Phase 2: Where relocation is determined to be a viable option, work with property owners toward implementation of that action based on available funding from FEMA and local match availability. Technique Category Hazard(s) Addressed Flood Flood, Windstorm/ Tornado, Earthquake Flood Priority (H/M/L) Medium- Medium- Estimated Cost Medium - Potential Funding Budget FEMA Grant Programs and local budget (or property owner) for cost share FEMA Grant Programs and local budget (or property owner) for cost share Lead Agency/ Department Engineering / Public Works Municipality (via Municipal Engineer/NFIP Floodplain Administrator) with support from PEMA, FEMA Municipality (via Municipal Engineer/NFIP Floodplain Administrator) with support from PEMA, FEMA Implementation Schedule Long-term (depending on funding) Long-term (depending on funding) Long-term (depending on funding) Applies to New and/or Structures

2018 Action Plan (continued) 4 5 Action Maintain compliance with and good-standing in the NFIP including adoption and enforcement of floodplain management requirements (e.g. regulating all new and substantially improved construction in Special Hazard Flood Areas), floodplain identification and mapping, and flood insurance outreach to the community. Further, continue to meet and/or exceed the minimum NFIP standards and criteria through the following NFIP-related continued compliance actions identified below. Conduct and facilitate community and public education and outreach for residents and businesses to include, but not be limited to, the following to promote and effect natural hazard risk reduction: Provide and maintain links to the HMP website, and regularly post notices on the County/municipal homepage(s) referencing the HMP webpages. Prepare and distribute informational letters to flood vulnerable property owners and neighborhood associations, explaining the availability of mitigation grant funding to mitigate their properties, and instructing them on how they can learn more and implement mitigation. Use email notification systems and newsletters to better educate the public on flood insurance, the availability of mitigation grant funding, and personal natural hazard risk reduction measures. Work with neighborhood associations, civic and business groups to disseminate information on flood insurance and the availability of mitigation grant funding. Technique Category plans & regulations Education & awareness Hazard(s) Addressed Flood All Hazards Priority (H/M/L) Estimated Cost Low - Medium Low- Medium Potential Funding Budget Municipal Budget Lead Agency/ Department Municipality (via Municipal Engineer/NFIP Floodplain Administrator) with support from PEMA, ISO FEMA Municipality with support from Planning Partners, PEMA, FEMA Implementation Schedule Ongoing Short-term Applies to New and/or Structures New & existing

2018 Action Plan (continued) Action Technique Category Hazard(s) Addressed Priority (H/M/L) Estimated Cost Potential Funding Lead Agency/ Department Implementation Schedule Applies to New and/or Structures 6 Begin and/or continue the process to adopt higher regulatory standards to manage flood risk (i.e. increased freeboard, cumulative substantial damage/improvements). plans & regulations Flood Low Municipal Budget Municipality (via Municipal Engineer/NFIP Floodplain Administrator) with support from PEMA, FEMA Short-term New & existing 7 8 9 10 Determine if a Community Assistance Visit (CAV) or Community Assistance Contact (CAC) is needed, and schedule if needed. Have designated NFIP Floodplain Administrator (FPA) become a Certified Floodplain Manager through the ASFPM and/or pursue relevant continuing education training such as FEMA Benefit-Cost Analysis. Participate in the Community Rating System (CRS) to further manage flood risk and reduce flood insurance premiums for NFIP policyholders. This shall start with the submission to FEMA- DHS of a Letter of Intent to join CRS, followed by the completion and submission of an application to the program once the community s current compliance with the NFIP is established. Obtain and archive elevation certificates for NFIP compliance. plans & regulations plans & regulations plans & regulations plans & regulations Flood Medium Low Flood Low Flood Medium Low Flood Low Municipal Budget Municipal Budget Municipal Budget Budget NFIP Floodplain Administrator with support from PADEP, PEMA, FEMA NFIP Floodplain Administrator NFIP Floodplain Administrator with support from PADEP, PEMA, FEMA NFIP Floodplain Administrator Short-term (year 1) Short-term (depending on funding) Short-term (year 1) Ongoing

2018 Action Plan (continued) 11 12 13 14 15 16 Action Continue to support the implementation, monitoring, maintenance, and updating of this Plan, as defined in Section 7.0 Complete the ongoing updates of the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans Create/enhance/maintain mutual aid agreements with neighboring communities for continuity of operations. Develop and maintain capabilities to process FEMA/PEMA paperwork after disasters; qualified damage assessment personnel Improve post-disaster capabilities damage assessment; FEMA/PEMA paperwork compilation, submissions, record-keeping. Work with regional agencies (i.e. County and PEMA) to help develop damage assessment capabilities at the local level through such things as training programs, certification of qualified individuals (e.g. code officials, floodplain managers, engineers). PA-611 Bushkill Creek Bridge Continue to petition state DOT to perform necessary mitigation of bridge Technique Category All categories plans & regulations All categories Education & awareness Education & awareness Hazard(s) Addressed All Hazards Priority (H/M/L) Estimated Cost Low (for 5-year update) Potential Funding Budget, possibly FEMA Grant Funding for 5-year update All Hazards Low Budget All Hazards Low Budget All Hazards Medium Medium budget All Hazards Medium Medium Flood budget, FEMA HMA grant programs State Infrastructure Budget Lead Agency/ Department Municipality (via mitigation planning point of contacts) with support from Planning Partners (through their Points of Contact), PEMA Municipality with support from PEMA Municipality with support from Surrounding municipalities and County Municipality with support from County, PEMA, FEMA Municipality with support from County, PEMA State DOT Implementation Schedule Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Short-term Short-, longterm (depending on funding) Long-term (depending on funding) Applies to New and/or Structures New & existing New & existing New & existing

2018 Action Plan (continued) 17 18 19 20 Action Cemetery Bridge Identify appropriate mitigation, secure funding, implement mitigation project Hugh Moore Park Bridge Identify appropriate mitigation, secure funding, implement mitigation project Glendon Bridge Identify appropriate mitigation, secure funding, implement mitigation project Relocate City Services Center (500 Bushkill Drive) - currently in Bushkill Creek flood area. Studying feasibility and potential relocation sites. Technique Category Hazard(s) Addressed Priority (H/M/L) Estimated Cost Flood Medium Flood Medium Flood Medium Flood Potential Funding Budget; Grant funding as available Budget; Grant funding as available Budget; Grant funding as available Budget; Grant funding as available Lead Agency/ Department Engineering / Public Works Engineering / Public Works Engineering / Public Works Engineering / Public Works Implementation Schedule Long-term (depending on funding) Long-term (depending on funding) Long-term (depending on funding) Long-term (depending on funding) Applies to New and/or Structures 21 Relocate/elevate homes located in the following flood areas: 14th Street at Lehigh Drive Lynn Street Raspberry Street at Leigh Drive area Peach Street Implement actions and further mitigate these areas through the following: Zoning: River Corridor & Other Green Areas (restrictive rezoning); enhanced floodplain requirements; Codes: Enforcement of regulations per statewide building regulations Outreach: Proactive outreach in advance (Codes), at times immediately pending (Police/Fire), and following (Codes) flood events; outreach for FEMA map updates Flood Low (Enforcement, Outreach); (Elevation, acquisition) Budgets; Grant funding (incl. mitigation grants) as available Planning; Code Enforcement Ongoing

2018 Action Plan (continued) 22 23 24 Action Mitigate properties impacted by the Lehigh River in the following areas: Buttonwood between Raspberry and 14th Street Winter Street in area of Raspberry and 14th Street Implement actions and further mitigate these areas through the following: Codes: Enforcement of regulations per statewide building regulations Outreach: Proactive outreach in advance (Codes), at times immediately pending (Police/Fire), and following (Codes) flood events; outreach for FEMA map updates Mitigate flooding at Eddyside Park (North Delaware Drive and SR 611) through the following: Zoning: River Corridor & Other Green Areas (restrictive rezoning) Development: Parks redesigned for flood resilience Mitigate flooding from the confluence of the Bushkill Creek and Delaware River in the area of the 100 Block of Bushkill Drive, through the following: Zoning: River Corridor & Other Green Areas (restrictive rezoning); enhanced floodplain requirements; Codes: Enforcement of regulations per statewide building regulations Outreach: Proactive outreach in advance (Codes), at times immediately pending (Police/Fire), and following (Codes) flood events; outreach for FEMA map updates Future: Studying removal of dams on Bushkill Creek Technique Category Hazard(s) Addressed Flood Flood Flood Priority (H/M/L) Estimated Cost Low (Enforcement, Outreach); (Elevation, acquisition) Low (Zoning); (structural mitigation) Low (Enforcement, Outreach); (Elevation, acquisition, structural projects) Potential Funding Budgets; Grant funding (incl. mitigation grants) as available Budgets; Grant funding (incl. mitigation grants) as available Budgets; Grant funding (incl. mitigation grants) as available Lead Agency/ Department Planning; Code Enforcement Planning; Code Enforcement Planning; Code Enforcement; Engineering Implementation Schedule Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Applies to New and/or Structures

2018 Action Plan (continued) Technique Category Hazard(s) Addressed Priority (H/M/L) Estimated Cost Potential Funding Lead Agency/ Department Implementation Schedule Applies to New and/or Structures Action Mitigate flooding from the Bushkill Creek and Delaware River to homes and businesses in the area of North Delaware Drive at Bushkill Drive, through the following: Zoning: River Corridor & Other Green Areas (restrictive rezoning); enhanced Low floodplain requirements; (Enforcement, Budgets; Codes: Enforcement of regulations per Outreach); Grant Planning; 25 statewide building regulations funding Code Flood Outreach: Proactive outreach in advance (Elevation, (incl. Enforcement; Ongoing (Codes), at times immediately pending acquisition, mitigation Engineering (Police/Fire), and following (Codes) flood structural grants) as events; outreach for FEMA map updates projects) available Development: Active engagement of Lafayette College regarding development of Film & Media Center, and past improvements Future: Studying removal of dams on Bushkill Creek Notes: Estimated Costs: Where actual project costs have been reasonably estimated: Low = < $10,000; Medium = $10,000 to $100,000; = > $100,000 Where actual project costs cannot reasonably be established at this time: Low = Possible to fund under existing budget. Project is part of, or can be part of an existing on-going program. Medium = Could budget for under existing work-plan, but would require a reapportionment of the budget or a budget amendment, or the cost of the project would have to be spread over multiple years. = Would require an increase in revenue via an alternative source (i.e., bonds, grants, fee increases) to implement. funding levels are not adequate to cover the costs of the proposed project. Potential Funding (FEMA HMA): PDM = Pre-Disaster Grant Program FMA = Flood Assistance Grant Program HMGP = Hazard Grant Program Implementation Schedule: Short-Term= 1 to 5 years Long-Term= 5 years or greater DOF = Depending on funding. Applies to New and/or Structures: = Not Applicable