Factors Influencing Perceptions of Climate and Weather Effects on Property Ownership

Similar documents
Potential Climate Compatible Tourism Adaptation Strategies for Belize

CHANGE IN COASTAL COMMUNITIES: PERSPECTIVES FROM DOWN EAST

Financing adaptation in Copenhagen

Investment and financial flows example - Tourism. Ankara, 6 September 2016

Adapting to. and Flooding. Report on a 2014 Survey of Waterford Residents. George Perkins Marsh Institute/Clark University and The Nature Conservancy

4 TH ANNUAL CAPE COASTAL CONFERENCE. Adaptation Planning, Environmental Economics and Community Engagement

Climate Change and Mortality

County of Kaua'i Multi-Hazard Mitigation and Resilience Plan, 2015 Update

Tax Fairness Dimensions In An Asian Context: The Malaysian Perspective

NORTH CAROLINA BEACH AND INLET UPDATE MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2016

Sarasota County. Citizen Opinion Survey

Flood Insurance Coverage in Dare County: Before and After Hurricane Floyd

Congressional Budget Office

NORTH CAROLINA BEACH AND INLET UPDATE MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2016

Aquidneck Island Resilience Strategy Issue Paper 4. Issue: RESIDENTIAL FLOODING

Vulnerability of Lents Floodplain Area Residents Study Area Map

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Indian Private Equity Industry The Challenges Ahead

Introduction Tool 1: Exploring the Risk Context Tool 2: Developing Adaptation Actions... 8

1. I N T R O D U C T I O N

Community Survey Results

TOWN OF EMERALD ISLE FISCAL POLICY

Los Angeles 4th Regional Investors Conference March 19-20, Los Angeles Wastewater System

Financial Literacy and its Contributing Factors in Investment Decisions among Urban Populace

EFRA Select Committee Enquiry on Climate Change Submission from the Association of British Insurers (ABI), October 2004

Volume 3-3. North Central Florida Region Regional Behavioral Survey Report

LOCAL FLOOD RISK STRATEGY EMYR WILLIAMS PEMBROKESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL

Valuing forest recreation in a multidimensional environment

Recent weather disasters Statistics of natural catastrophes Reasons for increasing losses Risk reduction strategies Conclusions

UNDERSTANDING THE LIMITS OF ADAPTATION LOSS AND DAMAGE: CONCEPT AND OVERVIEW

CHAPTER V. PRESENTATION OF RESULTS

Lake Tahoe Visitors Authority. Visitor Profile Study Top Line Results Preliminary Summer + Fall 2015

at 8 th IAEG-SDGs Proportion of men, women and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definition

Climate Change and The Built Environment

Influences and Economics of Urban Planning. Green connections Revenue generation Our future community Work where you play. ULI Meeting June 20-23

Townsville Coastal Hazard Adaptation Pilot Project

UNCTAD World Investment Forum, Ministerial Round Table, 16/10/2014, 3 to 6 pm, Room XX, Palais des Nations

1 statistics: and Protocols. List of Tier 1 statistics Published 282. aspx. Page 1 of 9. Notes for the list: the 2005 Tier 1 list.

Poverty and Witch Killing

Introduction P O L I C Y D O C U M E N T P A R T 1

Florida Statewide Regional Evacuation Study Program

IAL SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS SUPPLEMENTARY MATE RESPONSE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL DYNAMICS OF FLOOD RISK, RECOVERY AND RESPO

2018 Curricular & Co-Curricular Assessment Needs Survey & Interview Report

The National Citizen Survey

Measuring Sustainability: Project Houston

MEMORANDUM. TO: Barry Fadden, Acting Purchasing Agent; Carl Spector, Executive Director, Boston Air Pollution Control Commission

Chapter 12 The recommendations of the Commission

Economic accounts office

Climate change and the increased risk in the insurance industry. Dac Khoa Nguyen. Macquarie University

Shropshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy. Summary for Consultation. July 2014

Crediting Adaptation Strategies through the National Flood Insurance Program s Community Rating System Coordinator s Manual

Ex-Ante Evaluation (for Japanese ODA Loan)

Appendix G: La Crosse County Summary. Demographics

The Dialogue Podcast Episode 1 transcript Climate Risk Disclosure

Planning & Paying for Dynamic Parks & Recreation Systems

DRAFT STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCREENING REPORT. Climate Change Sectoral Adaptation Plan for Flood Risk Management ( )

CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE Citizen Survey. Survey conducted by Prairie Research Associates May 2017

Greenbelt Foundation Awareness Measurement Fall 2013

Disaster Risk Reduction and Management in St. Lucia

Planning for SLR Resiliency in Virginia Beach

Adapting to Weather Extremes: The Economic Impact in Iowa

Planning Commission Meeting. March 2, 2016

Presentation to the LRC Study Committee on Property Insurance Rate Making. By the. North Carolina Rate Bureau. December 1, 2011

FLOOD HAZARD AND RISK MANAGEMENT UTILIZING HYDRAULIC MODELING AND GIS TECHNOLOGIES IN URBAN ENVIRONMENT

Porthcawl to Sker Point (7)

Barry Island and Docks (2)

Addressing Long-Term Shoreline Management in North and South Carolina. Jim London London & Associates and Clemson University

Fannie Mae Own-Rent Analysis Theme 1: Persistence of the Homeownership Aspiration

Recreational Boater Willingness to Pay for an Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Dredging. and Maintenance Program 1. John C.

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Agenda Item B.8 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: May 19, 2015

FY and FY Draft Budget Operations Committee January 24, 2017

Influence of Personal Factors on Health Insurance Purchase Decision

RECREATIONAL AND COMMERCIAL WORKING WATERFRONTS IN FLORIDA: PERCEPTION OF THE WORKING WATERFRONTS TAX DEFERRAL PROGRAM

Laurence C. Bergman, Town Manager. FY Recommended Budget Message

February 13, 2019 Sea Isle City 2019 Budget Message and State of the City

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

Did not work at home: Less than 5 minutes Estimate Estimate Estimate

Do Liberal Home Owners Consume Less Electricity? A Test of the Voluntary Restraint Hypothesis

Climate Change : Adaptation is Urgent

Results from ECA study: Florida

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) ADDITIONAL FINANCING Report No.: PIDA5305. Project Name. Parent Project Name. Region Country Sector(s) Theme(s)

Bank of the West 2018 Millennial Study Results

OECD Policy Instruments for the Environment

WHAT DOES CLIMATE CHANGE MEAN FOR YOUR LOCAL AREA?

Alyth (Potentially Vulnerable Area 08/04) Local Plan District Local authority Main catchment Tay Perth and Kinross Council Alyth Burn (River Tay) Back

Economic Outlook: Grand Strand Economy

La Plata County Voters Views of DRO Ballot Issue

Kh ar Ras al Ahmar Profile

Economic Valuation of Kol Wetlands. Binilkumar A.S. A. Ramanathan

Gallinas Watershed Program

GUIDE Beta Version 1.0 Current as at: 12 November 2018

Hazard Mitigation Planning

Sea-level Rise and Law: Local Government Infrastructure & Other Challenges

Fiscal Analysis Long-Term Average Annual Oceanfront Erosion Rate Update Study Draft Erosion Rates and Amendments to 15A NCAC 7H.

MATRIX OF STRATEGIC VISION AND ACTIONS TO SUPPORT SUSTAINABLE CITIES

Sustainable Financing for Marine Conservation via Debt Conversions

CATASTROPHIC RISK AND INSURANCE Hurricane and Hydro meteorological Risks

RESTORE ACT Direct Component Multiyear Plan Matrix Department of the Treasury OMB Approval No Applicant Name:

European Commission, DG Regional and Urban Policy. Regional Policy

Transcription:

Factors Influencing Perceptions of Climate and Weather Effects on Property Ownership Huili Hao¹, Patrick Long¹, and Scott Curtis 12 1. 1. Center for Sustainability: Tourism, Natural Resources, and the Built Environment, East Carolina University 2. 2. Department of Geography, East Carolina University

Tourism Impacts and Second Home Development in Coastal Counties: A Sustainable Approach Brunswick, Currituck, and Pender, North Carolina Counties Study designed to help developers, elected officials, community planners, business owners, public managers and property owners in high amenity tourist-based communities, estimate, understand and manage the changes their communities may experience. The results are intended to aid in effective decision-making that will contribute to the long term economic, environmental and socio-cultural sustainability of these communities.

Today s Presentation --- Objectives Investigate the attitudes of property owners toward the impact of climate and weather on property ownership; Determine what factors influence property owners attitudes toward the impact of climate and weather on property ownership.

Research Questions 1. Do differences in perceptions of climate and weather effects on property ownership exist between full time local residents and second home property owners? 2. What factors contribute to influencing property owners perceptions of climate and weather effects on property ownership?

Methodology --- Survey and Sampling The Geographic Information System (GIS) Tax Records of Currituck County provided a list of the county s housing stock from which a sample was selected of both resident and second home property owners. 2408 full time property owners and 2350 second homeowners in Currituck County were randomly selected. 607 were completed and usable (376 second home owners; 241 full time residents).

Factor Analysis Variables Regression Analysis Sense of place Sustainable Actions IV Sustainable actions; Sense of place; Length of owning property; Residential status; Perceptions on extent that climate considerations affect future property values (changes in temperature/humidity, availability of freshwater, sea level and coastal flooding) Demographics (age, gender, income, education). Effects of Climate and Weather on Property Ownership DV Negative Effects of Climate and Weather on Property Ownership Positive Effects of Climate and Weather on Property Ownership

Study Area

Study Area: Currituck County Known for its beaches, nature and recreational activities including kayaking, fishing, and boating 24000 people, but increases three-fold during the summer tourism season In 2010 tourism generated $117.12 million, and 1,380 jobs were directly attributable to tourism 43% of the single family housing stock is considered second home property

12% 53% 8% 95% 58% 43% 100% 90% 246 163 80% 70% 543 2802 4566 60% 50% 40% 1769 1820 833 % Second Home Second Home Full Time Home 30% 20% 473 2053 6157 10% 0% 47 Crawford Fruitville Moyock Ocean Sands Popular Branch Total

Currituck County Second Home

Currituck County Second Home

Results and Discussion

Table 1 Descriptive Statistics for the Respondents Characteristics Currituck County Sample Size (n) 607 Percent Second Home Owners 60.9% Percent Male 59.5% Age Distribution <35 1.3% 35-44 years 9.1% 45-54 years 26.2% 55-64 years 37.0% 65-74 years 20.6% 75 and over 5.8% Income Distribution Less than $24,999 $25,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $99,999 $100,000-$399,999 $400,000 and over Education Status High school, GED or less Some college, technical or 2 year degree Bachelor s degree or higher 2.0% 10.9% 30.5% 49.1% 7.6% 8.3% 26.0% 65.7%

Impacts of climate change are evident in Currituck County Changing climate conditions will make Currituck County NO longer attractive to new residents Climate change will have a noticeably negative impact on my property values in the next 25 years I feel I am adequately prepared for a severe weather event (e.g. hurricanes, floods, heavy I feel the climate conditions here are ideal to attract new property owners. Weather conditions have changed enough in Currituck County that I would NOT consider Weather and climate conditions were important in deciding to own property in Currituck County. p.739.599.045.000.385.026.000 Full time 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Second home

Table 2. PCA for property owners sense of place Factored Items Factor Loadings I feel that I can really be myself here 0.825 I really miss it when I am away too long 0.892 This is the best place to do things I enjoy 0.864 Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.703 Sig. = 0.000 Cronbach s alpha = 0.823

Table 3. PCA for property owners perceptions on importance of sustainable development in their community Factored Items Factor Loadings Reducing and managing greenhouse gas emissions 0.759 Managing, reducing, and recycling solid waste 0.735 Reducing consumption of freshwater 0.694 Managing waste water 0.792 Being energy efficient 0.826 Conserving the natural environment 0.725 Protecting our community s natural environment for future generations 0.745 Protecting air quality 0.794 Protecting water quality 0.757 Reducing noise 0.601 Preserving culture and heritage 0.654 Providing economic benefits to local communities 0.447 Purchasing from companies with certified green practices 0.766 Training and educating employees on sustainability practices 0.753 Full access for everyone in the community in tourism development 0.557 decisions Cronbach s Alpha: 0.920; Variance Explained: 49% Kaiser-Meyer_Oklin: 0.920; sig.: 0.000;

Table 4. PCA for property owners perceptions of climate and weather effects on current property ownership Factored Items Factor Loadings Negative Effects of Climate and Weather on Property Ownership (Cronbach s Alpha: 0.518; KMO: 0.758; sig.: 0.000; VE: 58%) Weather conditions have changed enough in Currituck County that I would 0.571 NOT consider buying property here in the future Climate change will have a noticeably negative impact on my property 0.866 values in the next 25 years Changing climate conditions will make Currituck County NO longer 0.862 attractive to new residents Impacts of climate change are evident in Currituck County 0.822 Positive Effects of Climate and Weather on Property Ownership Weather and climate conditions were important in deciding to own 0.676 property in Currituck County I feel the climate conditions here are ideal to attract new property owners 0.785 I feel I am adequately prepared for a severe weather event (e.g. hurricanes, floods, heavy rainfall) KMO --- Kaiser- Meyer-Oklin ; VE --- Variance Explained 0.480

Table 5. Regression analysis for factors influencing property owners perceptions of climate and weather effects on property ownership (standardized coefficients) Variables Negative Perceptions Positive Perceptions Socio-demographics Gender -0.012 0.091 Age 0.071 0.098* Residential status 0.019 0.048 Income -0.032-0.010* Education 0.012-0.036 Sense of Care Length of owning property 0.057-0.098* Sustainable actions 0.231* 0.057 Sense of place -0.227* 0.318* Extent that climate considerations affect future property values Changes in temperature and/or humidity 0.289* 0.029 Availability of freshwater -0.115* -0.044 Sea level and coastal flooding 0.173* -0.017 Distance -0.066-0.161* Adjusted R² 0.258 0.133 F value 13.477 (sig. 0.000) 6.527(sig. 0.000) Note: * p< 0.05

Conclusion --- RQ1 Differences exist in the attitudes toward the impact of climate and weather on property ownership between full time residents and second home property owners. Second home property owners indicated a greater level of agreement on: weather and climate conditions were important in deciding to own property in Currituck County ; climate change will have a noticeable negative impact on my property in the next 25 years. Full time residents indicated a greater level of agreement on: I feel I am adequately prepared for a severe weather event (e.g. hurricanes, floods, heavy rains) ; weather conditions have changed enough in Currituck County that I would NOT consider buying property here in the future.

Conclusion --- RQ2 Negative Perceptions Sustainable actions; Sense of place; Changes in temperature and/or humidity; Availability of freshwater; Sea level and coastal flooding Positive Perceptions Age; Education; Length of owning property; Sense of place; Distance

Limitations and Future Research Limitations: Low R² Full time and second home property owners separation Future research: multilevel scale including individual, neighborhood and possibly regional levels

Policy Implications Information helps stakeholders recognize their vulnerabilities to climate change, adjust their property ownership practices, and develop adaptation strategies. Information can set the stage for communication and education activities with property owner groups. Opportunity to engage different property owner groups in the future planning and decision-making of land use and tourism for their county.