HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Similar documents
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

9.46 NAZARETH BOROUGH

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

9.51 PLAINFIELD TOWNSHIP

9.36 HANOVER TOWNSHIP

9.11 BUSHKILL TOWNSHIP

9.48 NORTHAMPTON BOROUGH

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

9.8 FOUNTAIN HILL BOROUGH

9.15 MACUNGIE BOROUGH

9.42 LOWER MT. BETHEL TOWNSHIP

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

9.24 WEISENBERG TOWNSHIP

9.29 THE CITY OF BETHLEHEM

9.2 ALBURTIS BOROUGH. This section presents the jurisdictional annex for Alburtis Borough. A. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

9.11 BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP

9.4 CATASAUQUA BOROUGH

9.10 HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP

9.3 CITY OF ALLENTOWN

6. MITIGATION STRATEGY. 62 municipalities have devised. 1,161 actions designed to prepare the Lehigh Valley for disaster.

9.22 UPPER SAUCON TOWNSHIP

9.35 VILLAGE OF TULLY

Sources of FEMA Funding

Chapter 7 Appendix B: National Flood Insurance Program Summary for Kaua'i County, 2015 Update

9.8 Borough of Far Hills

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT

9.3 VILLAGE OF DOBBS FERRY

9.28 Village of New Berlin

9.12 VILLAGE OF FABIUS

9.31 Village of Smyrna

9.23 VILLAGE OF WHITNEY POINT

9.20 VILLAGE OF MANLIUS

9.25 TOWN OF ONONDAGA

9.2 TOWN OF BARKER. This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of Barker. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT.

C APABILITY A SSESSMENT

This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of Chenango.

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

9.2 VILLAGE OF ARDSLEY

9.25 VILLAGE OF WINDSOR

9.4 VILLAGE OF CAMILLUS

According to the U.S. Census, the 2010 population for the Town was 803.

Meeting Date Time Location Attendees Purpose

Village of Blue Mounds Annex

9.14 TOWN OF LISLE. This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of Lisle. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT.

9.15 VILLAGE OF JORDAN

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

9.17 Town of Pharsalia

9.36 TOWN OF VAN BUREN

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS) Together North Jersey Resilient Task Force Meeting

State of Missouri Five-Year Floodplain Management Plan

9.15 Town of Otselic Hazard Mitigation Plan Point of Contact Municipal Profile. Population. Location.

State of Vermont FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT WORK PLAN

According to the U.S. Census, the 2010 population for the Town was 4,024.

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

9.24 TOWNSHIP OF WALPACK

Section 9.8: Town of Florida 9.8 Town of Florida Hazard Mitigation Plan Point of Contact Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact

9.9 TOWN OF DICKINSON

9.21 TOWN OF MARCELLUS

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Warren County Planning Workshop (2 nd Meeting) March 7, 2007

Floodplain Management Plan State of Utah

9.14 TOWN OF GREENWICH

A.) HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT

9.36 TOWN OF VAN BUREN

Hazard Mitigation Overview

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

T-318. Hazard Mitigation Section TDEM Recovery, Mitigation, and Standards

9.23 TOWN OF WASHINGTON

9.1 LEHIGH AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTIES

9.27 Village of Greene

in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department

Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) Program and Application Overview

SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES

Transcription:

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT manager@boroughoffreemansburg.org chief@boroughoffreemansburg.org MUNICIPAL PROFILE

MUNICIPAL PARTICIPATION

Compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Topic Identify source of information, if different from the one listed Additional Comments 1. Staff Resources Is the Community Floodplain Administrator (FPA) or NFIP Coordinator certified? Community FPA Outsourced Carroll Engineering Is floodplain management an auxiliary function? Community FPA Auxiliary Function Provide an explanation of NFIP administration services (e.g., permit review, GIS, education or outreach, inspections, engineering capability) What are the barriers to running an effective NFIP program in the community, if any? 2. Compliance History Is the community in good standing with the NFIP? Are there any outstanding compliance issues (i.e. current violations)? When was the most recent Community Assistance Visits (CAV) or Community Assistance Contact (CAC)? Community FPA Community FPA State NFIP Coordinator, FEMA NFIP Specialist, or community records No Development in the flood plain area would be sent to Borough Engineer, Carroll Engineering for appropriate review. Administrative organization and cost of administering the program yes none that are noted unknown Is a CAV or CAC scheduled or needed? No unknown 3. Regulation When did the community enter the NFIP? Are the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) digital or paper? How are residents assisted with mapping? Do floodplain meet or exceed FEMA or State minimum requirements? If so, in what ways? Describe the permitting process. NFIP Community Status Book Community FPA Community FPA Community FPA, State, FEMA NFIP 2001 most recent revision 2014 Paper plan meet minimum standards Plan review through submission to Borough and reviewed for compliance with NFIP by Borough Engineer

Compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) (continued) Topic 4. Insurance Summary How many NFIP policies are in the community? What is the total premium and coverage? How many claims have been paid in the community? What is the total amount of paid claims? How many substantial damage claims have there been? How many structures are exposed to flood risk within the community? Describe any areas of flood risk with limited NFIP policy coverage. 5. Community Rating System (CRS) Does the community participate in CRS? If so, what is the community's CRS Class Ranking? What categories and activities provide CRS points and how can the Class be improved? Does the plan include CRS planning requirements? Identify source of information, if different from the one listed State NFIP Coordinator or FEMA NFIP Specialist FEMA NFIP or Insurance Specialist Community FPA or GIS Analyst Community FPA or FEMA Insurance Specialist Community FPA, State, or FEMA NFIP Flood Insurance Manual (http://www.fema.gov/floodinsurancemanual.gov) Community FPA, FEMA CRS Coordinator, or ISO representative 35 policies in community unknown Additional Comments approximately 76 structures To the extent that there are 76 structures in the flood risk area of the Borough and only 35 known policies, the balance of properties would be of significant financial risk in the event of a flood.

COMMUNITY ASSETS

COMMUNITY ASSETS (continued)

Capability Assessment Capability 1. Planning Regulatory Regulatory/Tool/Program In Place Status Date Adopted or Updated Under Development Department/ Agency Effect on Hazard Loss Reduction: - Supports - Neutral - Hinders Change since 2013 Plan? + Positive - Negative Has the 2013 Hazard Plan been integrated into the Regulatory Tool/Program? If so, how? Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvement Plan Economic Development Plan Continuity of Operations Plan Stormwater Management Plan/Ordinance Open Space Management Plan (or Parks/Rec or Greenways Plan) Natural Resource Protection Plan Transportation Plan Historic Preservation Plan Floodplain Management Plan Farmland Preservation Evacuation Plan Disaster Recovery Plan Hazard Plan Emergency Operations Plan Zoning Regulations Floodplain Regulations NFIP Participation Building Code Fire Code Other How can these capabilities be expanded and improved to reduce risk? Additional Comments

Capability Assessment (continued) Capability 2. Administration Technology Staff/Personnel Resources 3. Financial Resources Planners (with land use/land development knowledge) Planners or engineers (with natural and/or human-caused hazards knowledge) Engineers or professionals trained in building and/or infrastructure construction practices (includes building inspectors) Emergency manager Floodplain administrator/manager Land surveyors Staff familiar with the hazards of the community Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and/or FEMA's HAZUS program Grant writers or fiscal staff to handle large/complex grants Other Capital improvement programming Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Special purpose taxes Gas/electric utility fees Water/sewer fees Stormwater utility fees Development impact fees General obligation, revenue, and/or special tax bonds Partnering arrangements or intergovernmental agreements Other Yes No Department/Agency Change since 2013 Hazard Plan? How can these capabilities be expanded and improved to reduce risk? Additional Comments

Capability Assessment (continued) Capability 4. Education Outreach Program/Organization Firewise Communities Certification StormReady Certification Natural disaster or safety-related school programs Ongoing public education or information program (e.g., responsible water use, fire safety, household preparedness, environmental education) Public-private partnership initiatives addressing disaster-related issues Local citizen groups or non-profit organizations focused on environmental protection, emergency preparedness, access and functional needs populations, etc. Other Yes No Department/ Agency Change since the 2013 Hazard Plan? How can these capabilities be expanded and improved to reduce risk? Additional Comments Capability Assessment (continued) Capability 5. Self-Assessment Area Planning and Regulatory Administrative and Technical Financial Education and Outreach Degree of Capability Limited Moderate Change since the 2013 Hazard Plan? If so, how? Additional Comments Hazard mitigation, emergency operating plan, Floodplain. zoning and subdivision and stormwater management plans in effect most work would likely be done by consultants at unknown cost. Borough resources limited would rely on grants or assistants from Feds for funding projects social media allows communication with citizens at reasonable cost and less staff time.

Known Or Anticipated Future Development/Redevelopment Development/ Property Name None Type of Development Number of Structures Location Known Hazard Zone Description/Status Natural Hazard Event History Specific To Freemansburg Borough None Type of Event and Date FEMA Disaster # (if applicable) Local Damage and Losses

2013 Action Plan Status Status No Progress/ Unknown Existing Action (from 2013 Hazard Plan) 1 Main St. new storm sewer system. Retrofit structures located in hazard-prone areas to protect structures from future damage, with repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss properties as priority. 2 Phase 1: Identify appropriate candidates for retrofitting based on costeffectiveness versus relocation. Phase 2: Where retrofitting is determined to be a viable option, work with property owners toward implementation of that action based on available funding from FEMA and local match availability. In Progress Continuous Completed Discontinued Additional Comments Identification of properties for retrofitting or modifiation would be made at the time of land development or modification. 3 4 Purchase, or relocate structures located in hazard-prone areas to protect structures from future damage, with repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss properties as priority. Phase 1: Identify appropriate candidates for relocation based on costeffectiveness versus retrofitting. Phase 2: Where relocation is determined to be a viable option, work with property owners toward implementation of that action based on available funding from FEMA and local match availability. Maintain compliance with and good-standing in the NFIP including adoption and enforcement of floodplain management requirements (e.g. regulating all new and substantially improved construction in Special Hazard Flood Areas), floodplain identification and mapping, and flood insurance outreach to the community. Further, continue to meet and/or exceed the minimum NFIP standards and criteria through the following NFIP- related continued Long term dependent on funding. Continuous process to remain up-to-date. Last revision to Flood Plain Regulations July 15, 2014.

2013 Action Plan Status (continued) Status Existing Action (from 2013 Hazard Plan) No Progress/ Unknown In Progress Continuous Completed Discontinued Additional Comments 5 Conduct and facilitate community and public education and outreach for residents and businesses to include, but not be limited to, the following to promote and effect natural hazard risk reduction: Provide and maintain links to the HMP website, and regularly post notices on the County/municipal homepage(s) referencing the HMP webpages. Prepare and distribute informational letters to flood vulnerable property owners and neighborhood associations, explaining the availability of mitigation grant funding to mitigate their properties, and instructing them on how they can learn more and implement mitigation. Use email notification systems and newsletters to better educate the public on flood insurance, the availability of mitigation grant funding, and personal natural hazard risk reduction measures. Work with neighborhood associations, civic and business groups to disseminate information on flood insurance and the availability of mitigation grant funding. support for educational outreach. Typically occurs with new development or use in flood prone area. 6 Begin the process to adopt higher regulatory standards to manage flood risk (i.e. increased freeboard, cumulative substantial damage/improvements) and sinkhole risk (e.g. carbonate bedrock standards). Prevention Education of property owners on prevention and property protection. 7 Determine if a Community Assistance Visit (CAV) or Community Assistance Contact (CAC) is needed, and schedule if needed. 8 Have designated NFIP Floodplain Administrator (FPA) become a Certified Floodplain Manager through the ASFPM, and pursue relevant continuing education training such as FEMA Benefit-Cost Analysis. Ongoing educational process for property owners developers. 9 Participate in the Community Rating System (CRS) to further manage flood risk and reduce flood insurance premiums for NFIP policyholders. This shall start with the submission to FEMA-DHS of a Letter of Intent to join CRS, followed by the completion and submission of an application to the program once the community s current compliance with the NFIP is established. 10 Archive elevation certificates

2013 Action Plan Status (continued) Status 11 12 13 14 15 Existing Action (from 2013 Hazard Plan) Continue to support the implementation, monitoring, maintenance, and updating of this Plan, as defined in Section 7.0 Complete the ongoing updates of the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans Create/enhance/maintain mutual aid agreements with neighboring communities for continuity of operations. Identify and develop agreements with entities that can provide support with FEMA/PEMA paperwork after disasters; qualified damage assessment personnel Improve post-disaster capabilities damage assessment; FEMA/PEMA paperwork compilation, submissions, record- keeping Work with regional agencies (i.e. County and PEMA) to help develop damage assessment capabilities at the local level through such things as training programs, certification of qualified individuals (e.g. code officials, floodplain managers, engineers). No Progress/ Unknown In Progress Continuous Completed Discontinued Additional Comments Continued support for new and existing uses. Emergency operation plan updated 2017. Action carried through to the 2018 Action Plan. Ongoing effort to ensure valid mutual aid agreements between Borough and surrounding municipalities. Ongoing effort to work with FEMA/PEMA with regard to paperwork submission and record keeping. Training for damage assessment, etc. Emergency Management Team coordination. Notes: 1) Actions not carried through to the 2018 Action Plan are so noted. 2) To maintain National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance, actions related to the NFIP were carried through to the 2018 Action Plan even if identified by the municipality as completed.

2018 Action Plan Action 1 Main St. new storm sewer system. 2 3 Retrofit structures located in hazard-prone areas to protect structures from future damage, with repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss properties as priority. Phase 1: Identify appropriate candidates for retrofitting based on cost- effectiveness versus relocation. Phase 2: Where retrofitting is determined to be a viable option, work with property owners toward implementation of that action based on available funding from FEMA and local match availability. Purchase, or relocate structures located in hazard-prone areas to protect structures from future damage, with repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss properties as priority. Phase 1: Identify appropriate candidates for relocation based on cost- effectiveness versus retrofitting. Phase 2: Where relocation is determined to be a viable option, work with property owners toward implementation of that action based on available funding from FEMA and local match availability. Technique Category Structure infrastructure Structure infrastructure Structure infrastructure Hazard(s) Addressed Flood Flood Flood Priority (H/M/L) Medium- Medium- Medium- Estimated Cost Potential Funding FEMA mitigation grants; CDBG funding; municipal budget for local match FEMA Grant Programs and local budget (or property owner) for cost share FEMA Grant Programs and local budget (or property owner) for cost share Lead Agency/ Department Engineer ity (via Engineer/NFIP Floodplain Administrator) from PEMA, FEMA ity (via Engineer/NFIP Floodplain Administrator) from PEMA, FEMA Implementation Schedule Long-term (depending on funding) Long-term (depending on funding) Long-term (depending on funding) Applies to New and/or Existing Structures Existing Existing Existing

2018 Action Plan (continued) 4 5 Action Maintain compliance with and good-standing in the NFIP including adoption and enforcement of floodplain management requirements (e.g. regulating all new and substantially improved construction in Special Hazard Flood Areas), floodplain identification and mapping, and flood insurance outreach to the community. Further, continue to meet and/or exceed the minimum NFIP standards and criteria through the following NFIP- related continued compliance actions identified below. Conduct and facilitate community and public education and outreach for residents and businesses to include, but not be limited to, the following to promote and effect natural hazard risk reduction: Provide and maintain links to the HMP website, and regularly post notices on the County/municipal homepage(s) referencing the HMP webpages. Prepare and distribute informational letters to flood vulnerable property owners and neighborhood associations, explaining the availability of mitigation grant funding to mitigate their properties, and instructing them on how they can learn more and implement mitigation. Use email notification systems and newsletters to better educate the public on flood insurance, the availability of mitigation grant funding, and personal natural hazard risk reduction measures. Work with neighborhood associations, civic and business groups to disseminate information on flood insurance and the availability of mitigation grant funding. Technique Category Education awareness Hazard(s) Addressed Flood All Hazards Priority (H/M/L) Estimated Cost Low - Medium Low- Medium Potential Funding Lead Agency/ Department ity (via Engineer/NFIP Floodplain Administrator) from PEMA, ISO FEMA ity from Planning Partners, PEMA, FEMA Implementation Schedule Ongoing Short-term Applies to New and/or Existing Structures New existing

2018 Action Plan (continued) 6 7 8 9 10 Action Begin and/or continue the process to adopt higher regulatory standards to manage flood risk (i.e. increased freeboard, cumulative substantial damage/improvements) and sinkhole risk (e.g. carbonate bedrock standards). Determine if a Community Assistance Visit (CAV) or Community Assistance Contact (CAC) is needed, and schedule if needed. Have designated NFIP Floodplain Administrator (FPA) become a Certified Floodplain Manager through the ASFPM and/or pursue relevant continuing education training such as FEMA Benefit-Cost Analysis. Participate in the Community Rating System (CRS) to further manage flood risk and reduce flood insurance premiums for NFIP policyholders. This shall start with the submission to FEMA-DHS of a Letter of Intent to join CRS, followed by the completion and submission of an application to the program once the community s current compliance with the NFIP is established. Obtain and archive elevation certificates for NFIP compliance. Technique Category Hazard(s) Addressed Flood; Subsidence/ Sinkholes Priority (H/M/L) Estimated Cost Low Flood Medium Low Flood Low Flood Medium Low Flood Low Potential Funding Lead Agency/ Department ity (via Engineer/NFIP Floodplain Administrator) from PEMA, FEMA NFIP Floodplain Administrator from PADEP, PEMA, FEMA NFIP Floodplain Administrator NFIP Floodplain Administrator from PADEP, PEMA, FEMA NFIP Floodplain Administrator Implementation Schedule Short-term Short-term Short-term (depending on funding) Short-term Ongoing Applies to New and/or Existing Structures New existing

2018 Action Plan (continued) 11 12 13 14 15 Action Continue to support the implementation, monitoring, maintenance, and updating of this Plan, as defined in Section 7.0 Complete the ongoing updates of the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans Create/enhance/maintain mutual aid agreements with neighboring communities for continuity of operations. Develop and maintain capabilities to process FEMA/PEMA paperwork after disasters; qualified damage assessment personnel Improve post-disaster capabilities damage assessment; FEMA/PEMA paperwork compilation, submissions, record-keeping. Work with regional agencies (i.e. County and PEMA) to help develop damage assessment capabilities at the local level through such things as training programs, certification of qualified individuals (e.g. code officials, floodplain managers, engineers). Technique Category All categories All categories Education awareness Education awareness Hazard(s) Addressed All Hazards Priority (H/M/L) Estimated Cost Low (for 5-year update) All Hazards Low All Hazards Low All Hazards Medium Medium All Hazards Medium Medium Potential Funding, possibly FEMA Grant Funding for 5-year update, FEMA HMA grant programs Lead Agency/ Department ity (via mitigation planning point of contacts) from Planning Partners (through their Points of Contact), PEMA ity from PEMA ity from surrounding municipalities and County ity from County, PEMA, FEMA ity from County, PEMA Implementation Schedule Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Short-term Short-, longterm (depending on funding) Applies to New and/or Existing Structures New existing New existing New existing

2018 Action Plan (continued) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Action Coordinate with the County Emergency Management Agency and PA Department of Health, which is responsible for setting up points of distribution and providers for immunizations. Devise an employee vaccination and immunization plan to prevent an outbreak within the municipal employee ranks. Devise a municipal continuity of operations plan to keep essential services running in the event that a significant portion of the workforce is affected. Devise a public education and outreach plan regarding disease prevention. Provide education and outreach to residents regarding how to prevent the spread of invasive species, including quarantine procedures. Develop a neighborhood cleanup plan designed to remove discarded tires, trash and other items in which standing water can form. Provide training and education for first responders to ensure effective emergency care. Provide education and outreach, especially in K-12, regarding drug abuse prevention. Technique Category Education awareness Education awareness Education awareness Education awareness Hazard(s) Addressed Pandemic and Infectious Disease Pandemic and Infectious Disease Pandemic and Infectious Disease Pandemic and Infectious Disease Invasive Species Invasive Species Drug Overdose Crisis Drug Overdose Crisis Priority (H/M/L) Medium Medium Medium Medium Estimated Cost Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Potential Funding Lead Agency/ Department ity, working with County EMA and PA Department of Health Implementation Schedule Ongoing Applies to New and/or Existing Structures ity Short-term ity Short-term ity Ongoing ity Ongoing ity Short-term ity Ongoing ity/ School District Notes: Estimated Costs: Where actual project costs have been reasonably estimated: Low = < $10,000; Medium = $10,000 to $100,000; = > $100,000 Where actual project costs cannot reasonably be established at this time: Low = Possible to fund under existing budget. Project is part of, or can be part of an existing on-going program. Medium = Could budget for under existing work-plan, but would require a reapportionment of the budget or a budget amendment, or the cost of the project would have to be spread over multiple years. = Would require an increase in revenue via an alternative source (i.e., bonds, grants, fee increases) to implement. Existing funding levels are not adequate to cover the costs of the proposed project. Ongoing

Notes: (continued) Potential Funding (FEMA HMA): PDM = Pre-Disaster Grant Program FMA = Flood Assistance Grant Program HMGP = Hazard Grant Program Implementation Schedule: Short-Term= 1 to 5 years Long-Term= 5 years or greater DOF = Depending on funding. Applies to New and/or Existing Structures: = Not Applicable