COURT OF APPEAL. Enter party/parties role in lower court or tribunal in brackets ex. (Plantiff), (Defendant)

Similar documents
Introduction Page to the Respondent s PDF Factum:

A GUIDE FOR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS

High Court Amendment (Appeals and Other Matters) Rules 2017

FIRST YEAR MOOTS 2017

PRACTICE DIRECTION A APPEALS. This practice direction supplements Part 20 of the Court of Protection Rules 2007

British Columbia Court of Appeal Practice Directive (Criminal) Title: Mental Disorder Appeals

How bankruptcy affects student loan debt

CROWN FOREST INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Practice Direction. Effective Date: 2017/05/01. Number: PD -54. Title: Summary:

COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL. - and - RESPONDENT S MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. APPELLANT S / RESPONDENT S FACTUM (Select One)

BRITISH COLUMBIA SECURITIES COMMISSION Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c Citation: Re Malone, 2016 BCSECCOM 257 Date:

A GUIDE FOR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS

SUPERIOR COURT DECISION

Houweling Nurseries Ltd. v. Houweling Page 2 Paul Houweling appearing in person for the Appellants D.B. Wende Place and Date: Counsel for the Responde

Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 12CA42 GEORGE ESPARZA, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

APOTEX INC. and. ALLERGAN INC. AND ALLERGAN, INC. and THE MINISTER OF HEALTH. Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on May 26, 2015.

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. ) ) Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Reasons and decision Motifs et décision

This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to (2)(c) and (f), STATS.

Appellant s notice (All appeals except small claims track appeals and appeals to the Family Division of the High Court)

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

IMMUNOVACCINE TECHNOLOGIES INC. and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN. Heard at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on September 9, 2014.

COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA

Court of Appeals of Virginia

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. CIVIL APPEAL NO.19 OF 2004 (Appeal from Kisutu Court Employment Case No.

: : : : : : : : : : CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Criminal Appeal from Mount Vernon Municipal Court, Case No. 01 CRB 773 A & B. Reversed and Remanded

FORM P40 (Rule 25-13(6)) STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT AFFIDAVIT

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 25 MDA 2014

Supreme Court of the State of New York Second Department Appellate Term 9th and 10th Judicial Districts Appellate Term

Cooper et al. v. Farmer's Mutual Insurance Company [Indexed as: Cooper v. Farmer's Mutual Insurance Co.]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL. Appeals NOTICE OF APPEAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO: SC v. THIRD DCA CASE NO.: 3D Lower Tribunal No.:

REPORTED * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APP. NO.109/2009

Chapter 3 Preparing the Record

CITATION: Aylsworth v. The Law Office of Harvey Storm, 2016 ONSC 3938 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: DATE: ONTARIO

Page: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION. TIM O HALLORAN, doing business as Tim s Island Wide Marine Services

NOTICE OF DECISION of the MISSISSAUGA APPEAL TRIBUNAL established pursuant to section 23.5 of the Municipal Act 2001

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT SACHS, WILTON-SIEGEL, MYERS JJ. ) ) ) Respondents )

Case Name: Paquette v. TeraGo Networks Inc. Between Trevor Paquette, Plaintiff (Appellant), and TeraGo Networks Inc., Defendant (Respondent)

HOSPITAL APPEAL BOARD. In the matter of DR. IMRAN SAMAD. And

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Date of decision: 9th January, 2013 MAC APP.

Ontario Ltd. (c.o.b. Castle Auto Collision & Mechanical Service) v. Certas Insurance, [2016] O.J. No. 264

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT. MORAWETZ R.S.J., WHITTEN and GRAY JJ. ) ) Respondent ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Respondents )

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA

The leaflet will also explain the meaning of some of the terms and expressions used in this guidance.

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

[Abstract prepared by the PCT Legal Division (PCT )] Case Name: Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc. Jurisdiction:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM

(Atlantic Provinces) Addendum----May 2016

COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA

The following version is for informational purposes only, for the official version. see: for Stated Cases

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

THE HONOURABLE FRANCIS J.C. NEWBOULD. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA. Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 16, 2017.

STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

Citation: Layton Eldon Manning v. The Queen Date: PESCAD 26 Docket: AD-0861 Registry: Charlottetown

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OTTAWA COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. OT Trial Court No.

Supreme Court of Virginia

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. ) ) ) ) ) Defendants ) ) ) ) Judgment on Motion for Determination of a Question of Law

litigation bulletin dinner and drinks: BC court of appeal confirms nightclub accident not within scope of professional insurance November 2012

1. Company/Organization/Individual named in the determination ( Appellant ) Name Address Postal Code

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of decision: 26th November, 2012 MAC.APP. 246/2010

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE A112490

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. BETWEEN: Her Majesty The Queen in Right of British Columbia Appellant. and. Philip Morris International, Inc.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

[Cite as Cugini & Capoccia Builders v. Ciminello's, Inc., 2003-Ohio-2059.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT AND

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Citation: Larry Penner Enterprises Inc v The Deputy Minister Date: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. THE FLORIDA BAR, : CASE NO: SC : LOWER TRIBUNAL: ,017 (02) Complainant-Appellee: FILING DATE: 8/3/2001

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Citation: Ayangma v. P.E.I. Human Rights Commission Date: PESCAD 20 Docket: AD-0863 Registry: Charlottetown

BRITISH COLUMBIA SECURITIES COMMISSION Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c Citation: Re Bai, 2018 BCSECCOM 60 Date:

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, CAUSE NO.: A

[Cite as Leisure v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2001-Ohio ] : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR COURT OF APPEAL

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

Date: Docket: A CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. TRUDEL J.A. Citation: 2007 FCA 397 BETWEEN: SNC LAVALIN INC. Appellant and THE MINISTER FOR INT

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

DECISION APPLICATION FOR STAY OR ADJOURNMENT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) MAC App 201/2011

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ) ) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM TAKAGI & ASSOCIATES, INC., INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Filed: March 17, 2006

Citation: Lambe v. Workers Comp. Bd. (P.E.I.) Date: PESCAD 6 Docket: AD-0880 Registry: Charlottetown

Court of Appeals Nos. L L Appellee Trial Court Nos. 01-TRD v. 01-CVH Appellant Decided: October 18, 2002

Citation: Korsch v. Human Rights Commission Date: (Man.) et al., 2012 MBCA 108 Docket: AI IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Cases

NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Citation: King s Corner Bar and Grille Ltd. v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2018 NSCA 9

ARBITRATION ACT. May 29, 2016>

Decision P12-02 (in reference to Order P11-02) ECONOMICAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Elizabeth Denham, Information & Privacy Commissioner

Transcription:

COVER PAGE INSTRUCTIONS (please remove table when completed): 1 Double click on REQUIRED grey text fields to enter and delete information. 2 Enter appellant and respondent s names below in exactly the same order and format as the Notice of Appeal or Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal unless the Court of Appeal has ordered changes to the style of proceedings. 3 To remove instructions table: 4 Select Delete Table COURT OF APPEAL FILE NO. Enter CA file number: example CA12345 COURT OF APPEAL ON APPEAL FROM the order of Enter the name of the judge of the Enter the court or tribunal where the order being appealed was made, e.g. Supreme Court of B.C. pronounced on the Enter the date on which the order being appealed was made BETWEEN: Enter name(s) of parties here Enter party/parties role in the appeal i.e. APPELLANT or RESPONDENT Enter party/parties role in lower court or tribunal in brackets ex. (Plantiff), (Defendant) AND: Enter name(s) of parties here Enter party/parties role in the appeal i.e. APPELLANT or RESPONDENT Enter party/parties role in lower court or tribunal in brackets ex. (Plantiff), (Defendant) APPELLANT S FACTUM [Enter Name of Appellant] [Enter Name of Appellant's counsel, if any] [Enter Address of appellant or, if the appellant is represented, name and address of the appellant's law firm] [Enter Name of Respondent] [Enter Name of Respondent's counsel, if any] [Enter Address of respondent or, if the respondent is represented, name and address of the respondent's law firm]

i INDEX INSTRUCTIONS (please remove table when completed): 1 This index has been formatted as a Word Table of Contents and can be updated automatically. DO NOT enter text into index. This MUST be updated BEFORE printing! 2 Optional: To view index (table of contents) in side navigation pane: Click View tab, go to Show section and check Navigation Pane. Select heading in navigation pane to navigate throughout factum. To remove navigation pane: Click Navigation Pane check box to remove check mark. 3 When factum COMPLETED: To update the index (table of contents): Click within the index. 4 Select Update Table (found on the left top corner of the index) 5 Select Update Entire Table and click OK. (page numbering and any headings you created with the Styles tab will be updated automatically in the index) 6 To remove instructions table: 7 Select Delete Table INDEX INDEX... i CHRONOLOGY...ii OPENING STATEMENT... iii PART 1 - STATEMENT OF FACTS... 1 PART 2 - ERRORS IN JUDGMENT... 2 PART 3 - ARGUMENT... 3 PART 4 - NATURE OF ORDER SOUGHT... 4 LIST OF AUTHORITIES... 6 APPENDIX: ENACTMENTS... 5

ii CHRONOLOGY CHRONOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS (please remove table when completed): 1 Enter brief, point form list or table of only critical events (relevant to an issue on appeal) 2 To add another row or delete a row to the chronology table: 3 Right click mouse inside chronology table 4 Click Insert and select Insert Rows Below or Above or click Delete Cells and select Delete Entire Row 5 To remove instructions table: 6 Select Delete Table Date Event January 1, 2014 The Appellant was travelling northbound at 50 km/h along No. 3 Road in Richmond, British Columbia, when he was involved in a car accident.

iii OPENING STATEMENT OPENING STATEMENT INSTRUCTIONS (please remove table when completed): 1 Enter concise statement of the nature of the appeal 2 Must NOT exceed 1 page. 3 To remove instructions table: 4 Select Delete Table [Enter text here]

1 PART 1 - STATEMENT OF FACTS STATEMENT OF FACTS INSTRUCTIONS (please remove table when completed): 1 Appellant s factum: must consist of a concise statement of the history of the proceedings and the facts of the case 2 Sources relied on for a statement of fact (e.g. testimony, an exhibit or the reasons for judgment): must be identified by referring to the volume and page number where it is found in the Appeal Record or Appeal Books or volume or page number and line number where it is found in the Transcript. 3 Consecutive paragraph numbering begins in Part 1 - Statement of Facts 4 To add to paragraph numbering: Enter text and press enter after each paragraph to maintain auto-numbering 5 To delete numbering use backspace key. 6 To remove instructions table: 7 Select Delete Table 1. Example: The appellant holds a British Columbia driver s licence and is an experienced driver with a clean driving record. Transcript, Vol. 1, page 222-223, Appellant s Appeal Book, Vol. 1, pg. 22. 2. 3. 4.

2 PART 2 - ERRORS IN JUDGMENT ERRORS IN JUDGMENT INSTRUCTIONS (please remove table when completed): 1 Enter a concise statement that sets out clearly and particularly in what respect the judgment or order appealed from is alleged to be in error. 2 Continue consecutive paragraph numbering from Part 1 3 To add to paragraph numbering: Enter text and press enter after each paragraph to maintain auto-numbering 4 To delete numbering use backspace key. 5 To remove instructions table: 6 Select Delete Table 5. Example: The trial Judge erred by: a. Committing a palpable and overriding error of fact in admitting the evidence of party X, when party X was not an eye-witness to the accident. b. An error of law in misapplying the legal test for the admission of hearsay evidence. 6. 7. 8.

3 PART 3 - ARGUMENT ARGUMENT INSTRUCTIONS (please remove table when completed): 1 Enter a concise outline of argument setting out the points of law to be discussed, with a reference to the volume and page numbers of the Appeal Record or Appeal Book or the volume, page and line numbers of the Transcript, and the authorities (acts, cases etc.) in support of each point. 2 Enactments (i.e., acts or regulations) cited or relied on upon may be briefly reproduced in Part 3 or reproduced entirely as an appendix with this factum or as a separate appendix from this factum. 3 Continue consecutive paragraph numbering from Part 2 4 To add to paragraph numbering: Enter text and press enter after each paragraph to maintain auto-numbering 5 To delete numbering use backspace key. 6 To remove instructions table: 7 Select Delete Table 9. Example: In Housen v. Nikolaisen, the Supreme Court of Canada provided that they standard of review from findings of fact is palpable and overriding error. Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 at para. 10 10. 11. 12.

4 PART 4 - NATURE OF ORDER SOUGHT ORDER INSTRUCTIONS (please remove table when completed): 1 Enter a concise statement of the nature of the order that is sought by the party preparing the factum 2 It must include a special disposition that is desired with respect to costs 3 Double click on REQUIRED grey text fields to enter and delete information. 4 Enter in location, month, day and year of factum 5 Enter in names of person submitting factum (lawyer or party) 6 When factum complete, print and sign Part 4 Nature of Order Sought 7 To remove instructions table: 8 Select Delete Table 13. The appellant seeks an Order: [Enter text here] 14. All of which is respectfully submitted. Dated at the City of Enter location, Province of British Columbia, this Enter month Enter day of Enter year. Enter lawyer's name or party's name Appellant

5 APPENDIX: ENACTMENTS ENACTMENTS INSTRUCTIONS (please remove table when completed): 1 The appendix is used for enactments (i.e., acts or regulations) only. 2 Copy and paste any portions of enactments into factum on which you rely on in Part 3 - Argument or; 3 Optional: Create a separate electronic file and paper volume for the enactments with the same cover (including colour) and same formatting as the factum. File with paper factum and electronic factum at the same time at the Registry. 4 To remove instructions table: 5 Select Delete Table Example: MOTOR VEHICLE ACT Construction and maintenance vehicles [RSBC 1996] CHAPTER 318 121 Despite section 120 (b), the driver of a vehicle referred to in that section must drive with due regard for safety, having regard to all the circumstances, including the nature, condition and use of the highway and the amount of traffic that is, or might reasonably be expected to be, on it.

6 LIST OF AUTHORITIES AUTHORITIES INSTRUCTIONS (please remove table when completed): 1 Authorities (case law, legal textbooks etc.) referred to in the factum must be listed in alphabetical order. 2 Authorities must be cited. Please follow Citation of Authorities (Civil & Criminal Practice Directive, 30 May 2013 3 Add the page or paragraph number of the authority where it is located in the factum. 4 Please use the factum CHECKLIST to ensure the factum (paper and electronic) is filed and submitted in the correct format. 5 To remove instructions table: 6 Select Delete Table Authorities Page # Paragraph # Alexander v. Bertram and Ford Credit Canada Ltd. (2000), 72 2 3 B.C.L.R. 3(d) 66 (S.C.) D.R. Fraser & Co. v. M.N.R., [1949] A.C. 24 10 13