AT WORK, AND POOR? A COMPARISON OF THE CZECH AND SLOVAK WORKING POOR POPULATIONS IN THE EU-SILC SURVEY

Similar documents
OWNERSHIP PRINCIPLE AND INTERNATIONAL MOVEMENTS OF GOODS: CZECH APPROACH

Labour market and Social Policy Review of Estonia

Pension Challenges and Pension Reforms in OECD Countries

The at-risk-of poverty rate declined to 18.3%

EXCLUSION. Reduce the number of people at risk of poverty or social exclusion by 1,500,000. Source: National Reform Programme (2015)

EXCLUSION. Reduce the number of long-term unemployed by 320,000 by 2020, measured against the annual average in 2008.

Inclusive Growth in the EU At A Glance

4. Data transmission. 5. List of variables

Intermediate Quality Report for the Swedish EU-SILC, The 2007 cross-sectional component

FACT SHEET Slovakia. Contents. I. Economic indicators. Table 1 Population and forecast (1990, 2004, 2020) - population in million ( )

EU Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC)

EXCLUSION. Reduce the number of long-term unemployed by 320,000 by 2020, measured against the annual average in 2008.

Copies can be obtained from the:

STATISTICS ON INCOME AND LIVING CONDITIONS (EU-SILC))

Social Situation Monitor - Glossary

Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Economy and Management Transformation (Volume II)

CZECH REPUBLIC. 1. Main characteristics of the pension system

Copies can be obtained from the:

Doing Business in the Czech Republic

Social Protection and Social Inclusion in Europe Key facts and figures

Joint OECD / Eurostat questionnaire on national accounts employment and hours worked CZECH REPUBLIC

Ways to increase employment

Estimating the Supplemental Poverty Measure from the 2014 Panel of the Survey of Income and Program Participation

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. accompanying document to the

Social trends and dynamics of poverty and social exclusion. ESDE conference Brussels 06/02/2013

TOURISM SUPPLY - OVERVIEW AND CZECH CASE -

The Northern Ireland labour market is characterised by relatively. population of working age are not active in the labour market at

P R E S S R E L E A S E Risk of poverty

Low unemployment rate and high job growth in Hungary

DEMOGRAPHICS AND MACROECONOMICS

REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Country fiche on pension projections

EMPLOYED OR INACTIVE? CROSS-NATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN CODING. Małgorzata Mikucka Marie Valentova.

PORTUGAL 1 MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PENSIONS SYSTEM

Determining Households and Income Coverage Year 2018

Invalidity: Benefits (I), 2002 a)

4 Distribution of Income, Earnings and Wealth

Household debt inequalities

MONITORING POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN NORTHERN IRELAND 2016

FACT SHEET United Kingdom

Demographic and Other Statistics for Women and Men Aged 50 and Older,

Although several factors determine whether and how women use health

Ageing working group Country fiche on 2018 pension projections of the Slovak republic

Hungary FDI and how it affects employment. 23rd May 2014

COMPSTAT TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS Paris France August 22-27

Long Term Reform Agenda International Perspective

FACT SHEET Malta. Contents. I. Economic indicators. Table 1 Population and forecast (1990, 2004, 2020) - population in million ( )

Extension of Social Protection in ASEAN. Celine Peyron Bista ILO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific 17 November 2014

Module 4: Earnings, Inequality, and Labour Market Segmentation Gender Inequalities and Wage Gaps

Summary of the most significant changes affecting employment taxation in 2018

Šárka Prudká. The University of Economics, Prague, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, Department of Regional Studies, Czech Republic

PENSIONS AT A GLANCE 2009: RETIREMENT INCOME SYSTEMS IN OECD COUNTRIES GREECE

STRATHMARTINE. Census Profile. Local Community Planning Partnership. dundee. Working together to make Dundee a better place

SENIOR HOUSING CONCEPT. ESSEC Paris

The welfare dependence in the Czech Republic

Ageing and employment policies: Ireland

Statistics about the Canning Town South Ward, Newham

Monitoring poverty and social exclusion

SOCIAL PROTECTION COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 2016 REVIEW OF THE SOCIAL PROTECTION PERFORMANCE MONITOR AND DEVELOPMENTS IN SOCIAL PROTECTION POLICIES

Employee Share Plans Taxation in Croatia

1. Poverty and social inclusion indicators

The Development of the Swedish Social Insurance since the 1990s

Determining Households and Income Coverage Year 2019

IOPS Member country or territory pension system profile: ARMENIA. Report issued on April 2012, validated by the Central Bank of Armenia

Maintaining Adequate Protection in a Fiscally Constrained Environment Measuring the efficiency of social protection systems

Development of the Basic Living Standard Indicators in the Czech Republic

IOPS Member country or territory pension system profile: ALBANIA

European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC)

A NOTE ON CARING AND MALTESE SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION

Case Study: ROMANIA Boosting Work Incentives for Poor Social Assistance Beneficiaries

SELECT FOREIGN LAWS PROVIDING TIME OFF FOR MATERNITY PURPOSES *

Labor-Force Participation Rate for Men and Women, Age 25 to 54, and Mothers, 1948 to 2005

Final Quality Report for the Swedish EU-SILC

SLOVAK REPUBLIC Act No. 599/2003 Coll. on assistance in material need and on amending of some acts

Eligibility for the in-work RSA and the Working Poor

INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA. Descriptive study of poverty in Spain Results based on the Living Conditions Survey 2004

Income and Poverty Among Older Americans in 2008

How the Census Bureau Measures Poverty

BASIC INDICATORS OF LABOUR AND SOCIAL PROTECTION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Invalidity: Qualifying Conditions a), 2005

Poland Social Sector and Public Wages Public Expenditure Review From Maastricht to Vision 2030 Overview

CYPRUS 1 MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PENSIONS SYSTEM

2015 Social Protection Performance Monitor (SPPM) dashboard results

Is the Danish working time short?

Social security and retirement reform a progress report

Final Quality report for the Swedish EU-SILC. The longitudinal component

SOCIAL PROTECTION COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 2018

4. EMPLOYMENT INCENTIVES AND THE SOCIAL WELFARE SYSTEM

What is Poverty? Content

Select foreign EXTO Laws: By Country

ANNEX 1: Data Sources and Methodology

How the Ross Plan Would Raise Rents on HUD-Assisted Households

25/11/2014. Health inequality: causes and responses: action on the social determinants of health. Why we need to tackle health inequalities

2.2 Total expenditure on pension benefits by pension scheme, ( )

National Social Report The Czech Republic

Poverty and Income Inequality in Scotland: 2013/14 A National Statistics publication for Scotland

Final Quality report for the Swedish EU-SILC. The longitudinal component. (Version 2)

1. Overview of the pension system

CZECH REPUBLIC Overview of the system

FYR of Macedonia: Measuring Welfare using the Survey of Income and Living Conditions (SILC)

WORK IS THE BEST FORM OF WELFARE (SAVINGS): THE PROCESS IS THE POLICY. BILL WELLS

Transcription:

AT WORK, AND POOR? A COMPARISON OF THE CZECH AND SLOVAK WORKING POOR POPULATIONS IN THE EU-SILC SURVEY Šárka Šustová, Martin Zelený, Eliška Zykmundová Czech Statistical Office, Household Surveys Department This contribution is a part of a wider research project on minimum wage and its influence CZECH STATISTICAL on the OFFICE economic Na and padesátém social 81, situation 100 82 Prague and 10 development czso.cz 1/X in the Czech Republic, supported by the Technology Agency of the CR, project No.TD010171.

CONTENT Definitions Worker Poverty Group 1 Individual poverty Household s poverty Individual vs. household s poverty Subgroups characteristics Group 2 Individual poverty Household s poverty Individual vs. household s poverty Summary CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 2/X

DEFINITIONS: WORKER 2 main groups of workers: Group 1: Persons who are 16 years old and over and worked 12 months in full-time employment Czech Republic: 3 451 thousand persons (33.2 %) Slovak Republic: 1 961 thousand persons (36.2 %) Group 2: Persons who are 16 years old and over and worked in full-time employment for at least 6 month, but not full year (less than 12 months) Czech Republic: 320 thousand persons (3.1 %) Slovak Republic: 132 thousand persons (2.6 %) CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 3/X

DEFINITIONS: POVERTY Indicators on household level: At-risk-of-poverty rate: Household equialised disposable income < 60 % median of national household equalized disposable income Czech Republic: 4 235 EUR Slovak Republic: 3 670 EUR Standard European indicator for measuring relative poverty CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 4/X

DEFINITIONS: POVERTY Indicators on individual level: Poverty in Earned Income (PEI): Earned income < poverty threshold for the household of a single person Earned income = wages and salaries + sickness benefits Poverty in Overall Personal Income Overall personal income < poverty threshold for the household of a single person Besides earned income, overall personal income includes also other income such as income from selfemployment, social benefits (e.g. unemployment benefits), etc. CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 5/X

GROUP 1: INDIVIDUAL POVERTY 4.3 % of employees in Group 1 has lower income from employment than single person household poverty line 3.8 % of employees whose overall personal income is not high enough to be above poverty threshold 0.5 p.p. of employees has additional income that keeps them above poverty threshold 7.4 % of employees in Group 1 has lower income from employment than single person household poverty line 6.8 % of employees whose overall personal income is not high enough to be above poverty threshold 0.6 p.p. of employees has additional income that keeps them above poverty threshold CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 6/X

GROUP 1: INDIVIDUAL POVERTY % CZECH REP. Difference (in p.p.) PEI 4.3 7.4 poverty rate after inclusion of: % SLOVAK REP. Difference (in p.p.) Income from self-employment 4.3 0.0 7.4 0.0 Unemployment benefits 4.3 0.0 7.4 0.0 Old-age benefits 4.2 0.1 7.2 0.2 Survivors benefits 4.2 0.0 7.0 0.2 Disability benefits 3.9 0.2 6.8 0.2 Other income 3.8 0.0 6.8 0.0 CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 7/X

GROUP 1: HOUSEHOLD S POVERTY 2.2 % of employees is poor by their household s equialised disposable income 19.2 % of them are poor also by their overall personal income 0.4 % workers are poor both by their household s income and by overall personal income = the core of the working poor population 3.1 % of employees is poor by their household s equialised disposable income 42.5 % of them are poor also by their overall personal income 1.3 % workers are poor both by their household s income and by overall personal income = the core of the working poor population CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 8/X

Poverty in Household s Income Poverty in Household s Income GROUP 1: INDIVIDUAL VS. HOUSEHOLD S POVERTY Poverty in Overall Personal Income Estimated counts in 1000s / share of employees (%) Poverty in Overall Personal Income Estimated counts in 1000s / share of employees (%) YES-YES 14 thousand, 0.4 % YES-NO 60 thousand, 1.7 % YES-YES 26 thousand, 1.3 % YES-NO 35 thousand, 1.8 % NO-YES 117 thousand, 3.4 % NO-NO 3 259 thousand, 94.5 % NO-YES 107 thousand, 5.5 % NO-NO 1 794 thousand, 91.4 % CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 9/X

SUBGROUP 1: CHARACTERISTICS predominantly women never-married or divorced one-person households 14 thousand, 0.4 % more often limitation in activities because of health problems single-parent households with dependent children block of flats in the densely populated area lower education level non-supervisory positions 26 thousand, 1.3 % declaration of better health most people with income up to 300 EUR detached houses in the thinly populated area CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 10/X

SUBGROUP 2: CHARACTERISTICS men-breadwinners: their personal income is not low, but the composition of their household makes them poor 60 thousand, 1.7 % declaration of better health married people parent families with children lower work intensity of their hh 35 thousand, 1.8 % more often limitation in activities because of health problems lower incomes CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 11/X

SUBGROUP 3: CHARACTERISTICS low personal income is not the problem for them, because the composition of their household keeps them above poverty threshold 117 thousand, 3.4 % higher incomes women married people households with other members 107 thousand, 5.5 % more often limitation in activities because of health problems CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 12/X

SUBGROUP 4: CHARACTERISTICS both men and women higher education level higher incomes households without children declaration of better health higher proportion of supervisory positions 3 259 thousand, 94.4 % higher proportion of men 1 794 thousand, 91.4 % lower number of supervisory positions CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 13/X

GROUP 1: INDIVIDUAL VS. HOUSEHOLD S POVERTY 2.2 % poor by their household s equialised disposable income 25.0 % poor by their household s income per capita 22.8 p.p. more people at risk of poverty when using per capita income instead of equialised one core of WP population increased by 1.7 p.p. (0.4 % 2.1 %) 3.1 % poor by their household s equialised disposable income 25.0 % poor by their household s income per capita 21.9 p.p. more people at risk of poverty when using per capita income instead of equialised one core of WP population increased by 2.8 p.p. (1.3 % 4.1 %) CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 14/X

Poverty in Household s Income (per capita) Poverty in Household s Income (per capita) GROUP 1: INDIVIDUAL VS. HOUSEHOLD S POVERTY Poverty in Overall Personal Income Estimated counts in 1000s / share of employees (%) Poverty in Overall Personal Income Estimated counts in 1000s / share of employees (%) YES-YES 72 thousand, 2.1 % YES-NO 789 thousand, 22.9 % YES-YES 80 thousand, 4.1 % YES-NO 409 thousand, 20.8 % NO-YES 60 thousand, 1.7 % NO-NO 2 530 thousand 73.3 % NO-YES 53 thousand, 2.7 % NO-NO 1 419 thousand, 72.4 % CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 15/X

GROUP 2: INDIVIDUAL POVERTY 36.9 % of employees in Group 2 has lower overall personal income than single person household poverty line If people from the Group 2 were able to keep their jobs, there would be 13.4 % poor workers in their income from employment there would be 23.5 p.p. less poor workers when compared with their present current overall income 53.5 % of employees in Group 2 has lower overall personal income than single person household poverty line If people from the Group 2 were able to keep their jobs, there would be 31.9 % poor workers in their income from employment there would be 21.6 p.p. less poor workers when compared with their present current overall income CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 16/X

GROUP 2: OTHER ACTIVITIES DURING THE REFERENCE YEAR Other activity CR SR Other activity CR SR Self-employed 3.2 % 2.5 % Unemployed 61.4 % 65.3 % Permanently disabled or/and unfit to work Fulfilling domestic tasks and care responsibilities 2.5 % 1.7 % 18.0 % 0.6 % Pupil, student, further training, unpaid work experience In retirement or in early retirement or has given up business 6.2 % 10.5 % Other inactive person 0.0 % 11.7 % 6.5 % 6.5 % Combination of more other activities 2.2 % 1.2 % CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 17/X

GROUP 2: HOUSEHOLD S POVERTY 8.6 % of employees is poor by their household s equialised disposable income 71.4 % of them are poor also by their overall personal income 6.1 % workers are poor both by their household s income and by overall personal income = the core of the working poor population 11.3 % of employees is poor by their household s equialised disposable income 84.9 % of them are poor also by their overall personal income 9.6 % workers are poor both by their household s income and by overall personal income = the core of the working poor population CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 18/X

Poverty in Household s Income Poverty in Household s Income GROUP 2: INDIVIDUAL VS. HOUSEHOLD S POVERTY Poverty in Overall Personal Income Estimated counts in 1000s / share of employees (%) Poverty in Overall Personal Income Estimated counts in 1000s / share of employees (%) YES-YES 20 thousand, 6.1 % YES-NO 8 thousand, 2.5 % YES-YES 13 thousand, 9.6 % YES-NO 2 thousand, 1.7 % NO-YES 98 thousand, 30.8 % NO-NO 194 thousand, 60.6 % NO-YES 58 thousand, 43.9 % NO-NO 59 thousand, 44.8 % CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 19/X

GROUP 2: INDIVIDUAL VS. HOUSEHOLD S POVERTY 8.6 % poor by their household s equialised disposable income 38.0 % poor by their household s income per capita 29.4 p.p. more people at risk of poverty when using per capita income instead of equialised one core of WP population increased by 15.5 p.p. (6.1 % 21.6 %) 11.3 % poor by their household s equialised disposable income 40.2 % poor by their household s income per capita 28.9 p.p. more people at risk of poverty when using per capita income instead of equialised one core of WP population increased by 19.2 p.p. (9.6 % 28.8 %) CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 20/X

Poverty in Household s Income (per capita) Poverty in Household s Income (per capita) GROUP 2: INDIVIDUAL VS. HOUSEHOLD S POVERTY Poverty in Overall Personal Income Estimated counts in 1000s / share of employees (%) Poverty in Overall Personal Income Estimated counts in 1000s / share of employees (%) YES-YES 69 thousand, 21.6 % YES-NO 52 thousand, 16.4 % YES-YES 38 thousand, 28.8 % YES-NO 15 thousand, 11.4 % NO-YES 49 thousand, 15.3 % NO-NO 149 thousand, 46.7 % NO-YES 32 thousand, 24.7 % NO-NO 46 thousand, 35.1 % CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 21/X

SUMMARY In work poverty is higher in Slovakia In the Group 1 of employees the core of the working poor population is 3 times bigger in Slovakia The highest influence on the poverty rate has the household composition Equivalence scales play crucial role when moving from individual to household level Income extrapolation significantly reduces income poverty in the Group 2 CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 22/X

Thank you for your attention! sarka.sustova@czso.cz martin.zeleny@czso.cz eliska.zykmundova@czso.cz CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, 100 82 Prague 10 czso.cz 23/X