Rating Methodology for Mining Industry

Similar documents
China Evergrande Group

Red Star Macalline Group Corporation Ltd.

Colour Life Services Group Co., Limited

China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.

Qiannan Dongsheng Development Co., Ltd

Fantasia Holdings Group Co., Limited

Guangxi Liuzhou Dongcheng Investment and Development Group Co., Ltd.

Credit Opinion 15 November 2017

Euler Hermes Rating GmbH. Methodology: Issuer Rating. 31 May 2016 formally amended on 14 November 2017

Moody s Approach to Assessing Credit Risk for Oil & Gas Companies. Gretchen French Vice President and Senior Credit Officer Moody s Investors Service

Asia Insurance Co. Ltd.

MSCI Commodity Producers Indexes Methodology

Hong Kong January 22, 2015

Red Star Macalline Group Corporation Ltd.

Rating Methodology by Sector. Cement

Methodology: Business Risk/Financial Risk Matrix Expanded

Euler Hermes Rating GmbH. Project Rating Methodology (Real Estate) 30 June 2017

MSCI COMMODITY PRODUCERS INDEXES METHODOLOGY

Credit Opinion: SGS SA

Credit Opinion: Empresa Nacional del Petroleo

Nippon Prologis REIT, Inc. (security code: 3283)

Rating criteria for the mining industry. February 2018

Ameritas Life Insurance Corp.

U.S.-Based Auto Supplier Autoliv Outlook Revised To Negative On Cash Injection In Veoneer; 'A-/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

Best s Credit Rating Methodology (BCRM) & MPL Insurer Ratings

Enhancement of Mutual Fund Category Classification Standards

For personal use only

Global Credit Research Credit Opinion 1 DEC Credit Opinion: Pohjola Insurance Ltd. Pohjola Insurance Ltd. Helsinki, Finland.

Export Development Canada (security code: -)

3i Group plc. Update following the publication of first-half 2018 financial results. CREDIT OPINION 28 November Update

Rating Action: Moody's changes outlook on ArcelorMittal's Ba1 CFR to positive from stable; affirms ratings Global Credit Research - 07 Dec 2017

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades ArcelorMittal's ratings to Ba2; negative outlook Global Credit Research - 12 Nov 2015

Methodology: Business Risk/Financial Risk Matrix Expanded

Rating Action: Moody's changes Officine Maccaferri's rating outlook to stable; all ratings affirmed Global Credit Research - 18 Apr 2018

Chubb Insurance Singapore Ltd.

Credit Sales and Credit Cards

Methodology Review Seminar

Corporates Corporates

CIMIC GROUP OUTLOOK UPGRADED TO STABLE BY STANDARD & POOR S

INDUSTRY OVERVIEW SOURCE OF INFORMATION

Rocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (BNW-7) Docket No Witness: Bruce N. Williams BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH

Credit Opinion: Elisa Corporation

Moody s Revised Rating Methodology: US Local Government General Obligation Debt

Mitsubishi Estate Logistics REIT Investment Corporation

Olam International Limited

Rating Action: Moody's assigns first-time A3 issuer rating to Midea Group Global Credit Research - 18 Nov 2015

Amlin Underwriting - Syndicate 2001

Turkey-Based Investment Company Dogus Holding Downgraded To 'B+'; Ratings Placed On CreditWatch Negative

South Africa-Based Capitec Bank Ltd. Assigned 'BB+/B' And 'zaa/zaa-1' Ratings; Outlook Stable

AXA China Region Insurance Co. (Bermuda) Ltd. And AXA China Region Insurance Co. Ltd. Rated 'AA-'; Outlook Stable

32. Management of financial risks

Best s Credit Rating Methodology (BCRM) & Market Segment Outlooks

Pacific LifeCorp And Insurance Subsidiaries

Business Risk/Financial Risk Framework Updated Matrix Financial Benchmarks How To Use The Matrix--And Its Limitations Related Articles

How We Rate Sovereigns

Banco Santander, S.A. (security code: -)

2015 Outlook: China s Economy and Bond Markets

U.S. REIT Credit Rating Methodology

For personal use only

Corporacion Nacional del Cobre de Chile Downgraded To 'A+' From 'AA-'; Outlook Stable

Beijing Easyhome Investment Holding Group Co., Ltd.

Canadian Life Insurance Industry

SECOM General Insurance Co., Ltd. (security code: -)

14. What Use Can Be Made of the Specific FSIs?

THE MINATO BANK, LTD.

FTSE Global Factor Index Series

U.S. and Canadian Not- For-Profit Transportation Infrastructure Enterprises

PEMEX Stand-Alone Credit Profile Revised To 'bb' From 'bb+' On Revised Oil Price Assumptions; Ratings Affirmed

Credit Opinion: Ascendas Real Estate Investment Trust

Municipal Utilities OVERVIEW & METHODOLOGY UPDATE. Ted Damutz, VP-Senior Credit Officer

GOVERNMENT AGENCIES OVERVIEW

FRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER

Rating Action: Moody's: NAMA triggers mostly positive actions on Irish Banks' BFSR's

Figure 1: Groupon s One-Year EDF Measure

Rating Methodology for Non-Banking Finance Companies

GLOBAL CREDIT RATING CO. Rating Methodology. Structured Finance. Global Consumer ABS Rating Criteria Updated April 2014

Japan Rental Housing Investments Inc. (security code: 8986)

Rating Methodology by Sector. Leasing

ERM in the Rating Process: A Practical Perspective

Standard & Poor s Presentation Virginia GFOA

Rating Action: Moody's confirms KOKS's B3 rating; negative outlook Global Credit Research - 24 Oct 2016

Credit Opinion: Infrastructure Finance Corp. Ltd

Credit Opinion: Corporación Andina de Fomento

Rating Action: Moody's changes Metso Corporation's outlook to stable; affirms Baa2 ratings Global Credit Research - 30 Oct 2014

Weber School District, UT

Managing IFRS 9 expected credit losses variance and forecast uncertainty

Credit Opinion: CNPC Captive Insurance Company Limited

Rating Methodology Stephen Irwin, Vice President, A.M. Best Doniella Pliss, Managing Senior Financial Analyst, A.M. Best

February Request for Comment:

Steel Group ArcelorMittal Upgraded To 'BBB-' On Decreasing Debt And Solid Performance; Outlook Stable

A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S

R&I's Analytical Approach to Sovereigns

2016 Outlook The Chinese Economy and Debt Market

African Reinsurance Corp. 'A-' Ratings Affirmed After Insurance Criteria Change; Outlook Stable

Listed Infrastructure Funds

Future Flow Securitization

Corporación Andina de Fomento Outlook Revised To Negative On Likelihood Of Venezuela Nonpayment; Ratings Affirmed

MS Amlin Group - Syndicate 2001

Credit Opinion: Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten N.V.

Credit Opinion: Pohjola Insurance Ltd

Transcription:

December 2017 Rating Methodology for Mining Industry Summary This rating methodology adopted by China Chengxin (Asia Pacific) Credit Ratings Company Limited ( CCXAP ) is applicable to mining companies and companies with similar business nature of mining companies. CCXAP defines mining companies as upstream companies engaged in the mining, extracting, smelting and refining of coal, ferrous metal, non-ferrous metal and precious metal. This rating methodology is not applicable to downstream companies engaged in the value-added processing such as packaging and manufacturing of purchased raw materials. This rating methodology introduces the key determinants for rating mining companies. CCXAP assigns credit ratings to them using its rating scale. Introduction of Rating Methodology The key rating determinants for the assessment of a mining company are divided into qualitative determinants and quantitative determinants. The rating methodology provides a summarized guidance for the important factors used in assigning ratings, but it does not include every aspects of rating consideration. As a result, the mapped rating may not match the final rating of each company. In this rating methodology, there are five rating factors comprising 10 sub-factors as follow: Rating Factors Business Profile Scale Profitability and Efficiency Financial Policy Financial Strength Sub-factors Reserve Position and Quality Operational Volatility and Cost Market Position and Diversification Total Revenue EBIT/Revenue Return on Assets Total Debt/Total Capital Total Debt/EBITDA EBIT/Interest (CFO-Dividend)/Total Debt Key Rating Determinants Rating factors and sub-factors are discussed in details in this section, including their rationale, China Chengxin (Asia Pacific) Credit Ratings Company Limited Rating Methodology 1

measurement and how they will affect the rating. 1. Business Profile A mining company may start its operations by extracting raw materials on self-owned mines. Thus, the reserve and supply of raw material can significantly influence a mining company. Given the volatile commodity prices, market position and diversification are the important indicators to evaluate a mining company s competitiveness. The factor of business profile captures the non-financial aspects of the company. (1) Reserve Position and Quality CCXAP starts the analysis from evaluating the reserve position and quality of the company. Within a resource intensive industry, position and quality of reserve determines the longevity of the Company s production and operation profile. Mining companies with larger proven and existing reserves, as well as longer residual lives have abundant resources for production, and are better protected by fluctuations in the price of raw materials. Altitude and proximity to infrastructure are some of the variables that change with the reserve position and affect the companies operating and developing cost. Mining companies may be required to have permissions from the government before they start operating the mines while the permissions may comprise a number of restrictions, such as permitted exploitation time. Those restrictions are also taken into account while they may affect mining companies production profile. The level of recoverable reserves, grade and mining conditions are some of the factors to determinate reserve quality while there are various reserve testing requirements in different countries and different minerals have different rating standards. Thus it is difficult to quantify the reserve quality and compare different minerals with each other s. CCXAP believes those in line with higher standards of specific country and specific industry exhibit higher quality of reserve. (2) Operational Volatility and Cost The stability of raw materials supply and the ability to control cost is of great importance to the credit rating of a mining company. With an access to cheap, sustainable raw materials, mining companies tend to conduct better cost control and are able to expand across their product lines. Due to the scarce in exploitation of non-ferrous metals, a stable supply of specific raw materials is more crucial for non-ferrous metal companies. CCXAP measures the credit quality and scale of the suppliers as well as the average prices paid to suppliers to measure the raw materials supply stability. The stability of profit generation is vital, especially under volatile commodity prices, so the cost position and cost structure of mining companies is also examined. (3) Market Position and Diversification Mining companies performance can be seriously influenced by the change of economy. In the recession of economy, companies performance can be significantly affected while companies with a leading market position and strong competitive advantages are more likely to survive since they are difficult to be replaced in a highly concentrated market. Rating Methodology for Mining Industry 2

While mining companies are exposed to volatile prices, those with greater operational diversity will be less vulnerable to economic cycles and demand fluctuations. CCXAP considers product diversification and geographic diversification of the company. In assessing product diversification, the number of different types of minerals the company possess and the percentage of revenues from each operating segment are taken into account. Geographic diversification lowers the influence of strikes, equipment failures, pit wall slides and other operational risks for the company. Also, less reliant of a specific region can weaken the effect of the region s economy downturn which may lower the risk. In the evaluation of diversification, CCXAP considers the companies diversification strategy as a whole instead of only considering the diversification in the number of segments and regions. 2. Scale Coal, metals and other resources are typically controlled by the government, and companies need official approval to start mining activities. Large mining companies make greater contributions to the local economy, and may enjoy favorable terms in acquiring resources. Within a cyclical industry, large mining companies show competitive advantage in adjusting supply to fit market demand, and typically have strong access to diversified financing channels. In the evaluation of the scale factor, CCXAP reviews total revenue of the company. (1) Total Revenue CCXAP considers revenue in measuring the scale of the company. Mining companies that generate larger revenue tend to have stronger track of performance, and typically have the market share and resources to operate in various markets. Sustainable revenue growth also reflects strong market demands for the company s products. Conversely, companies generating smaller revenue exhibit lower market share and weaker scale and capacity. 3. Profitability and Efficiency Given that mining industry faces severe price sensitivity, mining companies have limited pricing power and are vulnerable to demand fluctuation. The ability of cost control and operating efficiency are important considerations for the credit rating of mining companies. In the evaluation of profitability and efficiency, CCXAP uses EBIT/Revenue and Return on Assets. (1) EBIT/Revenue CCXAP focuses on the EBIT margin of mining companies, which is calculated by EBIT to total revenue. Companies need to roughly match or exceed depreciation in order to sustain the development so EBIT margin is a reasonable proxy to understand companies profitability. Companies with higher EBIT margin tend to conduct better cost control and generate stronger operating cash flows. A decline in EBIT margins indicates increasing operating costs, lower pricing power or even loss-making projects. (2) Return on Assets In assessing profitability of a mining company, CCXAP also uses return on assets, which is calculated by dividing EBIT by average assets. This indicator confirms the company s competitive position, and reflects its future growth capacity from the asset perspective. Rating Methodology for Mining Industry 3

4. Financial Policy In the evaluation of financial policy, CCXAP reviews the financial indicators of debt leverage of the company. The leverage indicators reflect the company s financial flexibility and long-term viability. The financial policy is of importance for the industry as mining companies usually are unable to bear a high degree of financial leverage with the unstable profit and cash generation. (1) Total Debt/Total Capital In assessing the financial leverage of mining companies, CCXAP uses the total capitalization ratio, which is calculated by dividing total debt by total capital. Total debt refers to interest-bearing debt, including bonds, notes, short-term and long-term borrowings. Higher leverage exerts pressure on the company s ability to raise funds and repay debts. Mining projects usually take a long period to be completed, which are affected by external factors such as raw material prices and labor costs. Meanwhile, mining companies operate under the pressure of complicated financing environment. Therefore, it is particularly important for mining companies to have reasonable capital structure, optimal funding sources, and diversified debt maturities. (2) Total Debt/EBITDA CCXAP also focuses on the company s debt level relative to its expected profit to measure the company s ability to repay debt from its operating earnings. This indicator is calculated by dividing total debt by EBITDA. Even for companies with the same financial leverage, their repayment capability reveals different level of financial risk. 5. Financial Strength In the evaluation of financial strength, CCXAP considers companies ability to repay the interest and debt with their income and cash generated from operating activities. (1) EBIT/Interest This indicator is used to measure the company s ability to repay the interest of the interest-bearing debt and other fixed charges by its operating earnings. The indicator is calculated by dividing EBIT by the sum of interest expense and capitalized interest. (2) (CFO-Dividend)/Total Debt This is an indicator measuring the company s ability to repay its debt using cash flow from operating activities less dividends. This indicator reflects the company s vulnerability to liquidity risk and capability to maintain business operations. Other Rating Considerations Other than the factors and sub-factors discussed before, CCXAP gives consideration to safety, management policy, and corporate governance when assessing a company s overall credit strength. Safety Rating Methodology for Mining Industry 4

The mine safety is vital to mining companies because the occurrence of mining accidents can cause heavy casualties among miners with significant losses of the companies. Therefore, CCXAP believes that a safety mining environment is a foundation of the company and should not be a factor to upgrade the rating. But CCXAP still considers this factor because the company s rating may be downgraded with an unsafe mining environment. Corporate Governance Corporate governance represents the system of rules, practices and processes by which the company is controlled and directed, and it is an important rating consideration. The company with strong corporate governance has fair and transparent sets of rules and controls in which all stakeholders have aligned incentives. Management Policy The management policy can significantly affect companies credit profile. Through assessing feasibility and execution of companies strategic plan and risk management, CCXAP analyses the companies future performance. An effective long-term strategic plan and conservative risk management can improve companies credit profile. Event Risk CCXAP will consider the possibility of unexpected events that could cause a sudden and sharp decline in the issuer s overall credit profile, including asset sales, spin-offs, capital restructuring program, change of major shareholders, mergers and acquisition and significant restructuring program. Geopolitical Risk Mining companies assets locate in many countries as mineral resources spread over the world and their businesses operate globally. The different jurisdiction and regulation in different countries will affect the companies operation model. Operating in the countries with strict mining regulation, immature and potential for changes in tax regulation may increase the geopolitical risk. In the evaluation of geopolitical risk, CCXAP considers the development and potential changes in regulation in the countries which the company operates in. External Support Support from companies shareholders affects the company s future development and credit profile. CCXAP measures the willingness and degree of support by development strategy, market position, ownership structure, and the subsidiary s importance within the group. We also view that a company with strong shareholders may receive parental support of capital injection and other kinds of support. Rating Methodology for Mining Industry 5

Copyright 2017. China Chengxin (Asia Pacific) Credit Ratings Company Limited. All rights reserved. Important Information All information published in this document belongs to China Chengxin (Asia Pacific) Credit Ratings Company Limited (CCXAP) and is subject to change without prior notice by CCXAP. CCXAP considers the information contained in this document reliable. However, all information is provided on an "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" basis and CCXAP does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or timeliness of any information included in this document. None of the information may be used, including without limitation reproducing, amending, sending, distributing, transferring, lending, translating, or adapting the information, for subsequent use without CCXAP's prior written permission. CCXAP is not liable for any in whole or part caused by, resulting from or relating to any error (neglect or otherwise) or other circumstances or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of CCXAP's or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, interpretation, analysis, editing, transcription, publication, communication or delivery of any such information, or any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if CCXAP, or representatives thereof, are advised of the possibility of such damage, losses or expenses. China Chengxin (Asia Pacific) Credit Ratings Company Limited Address: Suites 805-808, 8/F, Jardine House, 1 Connaught Place, Central, Hong Kong Website: www.ccxap.com Email: info@ccxap.com Tel: +852-2860 7111 Fax: +852-2868 0656 Rating Methodology for Mining Industry 6