New tax regime for intellectual property rights

Similar documents
Cyprus Tax News Amendments to Cyprus s IP regime

Luxembourg Parliament adopts new IP regime

Tax changes for 2018 disclosed in the new budget bill

Intellectual property rights in Luxembourg (IPR): tax exemption

Information Sheet No. 66. The New Intellectual Property (IP) Tax Regime in Cyprus

Software and innovation deduction: Belgium is the place to be! 23 November 2017

Brexit: what might change Intellectual Property

SEMINAR ON TRANSFER PRICING 23rd September, Valuation Approaches and their applicability under Transfer Pricing. CA Siddharth Banwat

Taxing Intellectual Property: CFC rules and the Patent Box 3 March Group Finance Controllers Functions Insurance Taxation Treasury

LEGAL ALERT LUXEMBOURG UPCOMING TAX CHANGES NOVEMBER

International Fiscal Association 2017 Rio de Janeiro Congress. cahiers. de droit fiscal international. volume 102. B: The future of transfer pricing

New Luxembourg tax measures Luxembourg tax alert

LUXEMBOURG GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION

Annual International Bar Association Conference Sydney, Australia. Recent Developments in International Taxation. Republic of Cyprus

THE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT BOX Public Consultation JANUARY 2015

Intellectual property and the Patent Box

How should companies react to the new 10 per cent. tax rate on patent profits?

Panama s Minister of Economy and Finance proposes bill for calculating income subject to preferential tax treatment under an IP regime

IMPORTANT ECONOMIC INCENTIVES Article by Liam Grimes, Director of Tax, KPMG, Moderator Professional 2 Advanced Taxation.

Transfer Pricing Forum

International Tax Luxembourg Highlights 2018

The Knowledge Development Box ( KDB ) Public Consultation Paper. We are writing to respond to the above named document issued on 14 January 2015.

Analysis of New Law UK CORPORATE TAX REFORM. Nikol Davies *

Luxembourg Parliament approves 2016 tax measures

Tax Briefing No 09. This content is more than 5 years old. Where still relevant it has been incorporated. into a Tax and Duty Manual

United Kingdom Tax Alert

EU Commission approves enhancements to Madeira International Business Center Tax Regime

Knowledge Development Box Utilising it for maximum benefit

The patent box and I.P. tax regime under Action 5

Should the United States Adopt an Innovation Box?: The Post-BEPS Landscape

Executive summary. EY Global Tax Alert Library

Finance Bill Finance Bill Draft legislation on modified UK patent box. Executive Summary. December 2015

Note from the Coordinator of the Subcommittee on Tax Treatment of Services: Draft Article and Commentary on Technical Services.

BEPS AND BEYOND BEPS: A BRAVE NEW WORLD IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TAXATION?

Luxembourg Country Profile

Eligibility and time limits

BUSINESS IN THE UK A ROUTE MAP

UK publishes draft legislation on modified patent box regime

OECD releases final BEPS package

Exploiting Intellectual Property Rights: Key Attractions of Locating Operations in Ireland

ROMANIA GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION

Belgium Country Profile

VIA . Pragya Saksena Coordinator, Subcommittee on Royalties UN Committee of Tax Experts

BELGIUM GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION

Principles of International Tax Planning

BEPS Actions implementation by country Actions 8-10 Transfer pricing

Luxembourg transfer pricing legislation at a glance

Consultation on modified UK patent box

Withholding tax in the era of BEPS, CIVs and digital economy IFA 2018 Korea Congress / Main subject 2 Luxembourg branch Report

Overview of R&D Tax Incentives

Which Cos. Are Most Likely To Benefit From Innovation Box?

Tax rates ( ) 1.1 Key tax rates Top corporate income tax (CIT) rate (national and local average if applicable)

FOCUS INTERNATIONAL. October 2015 Cyprus edition. New legislation opens Cyprus for more business. Cyprus citizenship and residency schemes

Belgian R&D tax incentives

Iceland Country Profile

Luxembourg tax newsletter

Cyprus Tax Update. Kyiv May 2018

Luxembourg strengthens its Transfer Pricing Rules

Legal DELOITTE TAXLAB Peter Kits & Pim Gerritsen van der Hoop

The Innovation Promotion Act of 2015: Not the New Ireland

The International Tax Landscape

PATENT BOX HOW TO REDUCE UK CORPORATION TAX

The impact of Brexit on Intellectual Property. August 2016

TAX IMPLICATIONS RELATED TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FRS 138: INTANGIBLE ASSETS

BUSINESS MODELS IN THE CURRENT BEPS ENVIRONMENT DO YOU NEED TO CHANGE? Lyndon James, Partner Pete Rhodes, Senior Manager PwC

LUXEMBOURG IP TAX REGIME

Tax Management. Using Internal Agreements to Price Intangibles Transfers

International Tax Belgium Highlights 2018

New Swiss corporate tax developments : A paradigm shift?

French Government releases draft Finance Bill for 2019

Transfer Pricing Perspectives: The new normal: full TransParency. The post BEPS world in the automotive industry

The OECD s 3 Major Tax Initiatives

Is it time for your country to consider the "patent box"?

Defining Intellectual Property The Tax Implications

Tax Planning in the Middle East

Resumption of Application of Substantial Activities Factor to No or only Nominal Tax Jurisdictions. Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 5

KPMG LLP 2001 M Street, NW Washington, D.C Comments on the Discussion Draft on Cost Contribution Arrangements

Structuring Investments into Africa: Tax and BITs Aspects

1. Corporate Income Tax

STEP Silicon Valley Ireland: Gateway to Accessing the EU Market

PUBLIC INTRODUCTION /15 AS/FC/mpd 1 DG G 2B LIMITE EN. Council of the European Union Brussels, 23 November 2015 (OR. en) 14302/15 LIMITE

Table of Contents. Acknowledgements. Foreword. and Essential Legal and Accounting Knowledge 1

Fair taxation of the digital European Commission DG TAXUD. economy

Gene Ferraro, Mazars USA LLP New York, NY William D. James, BKD, LLP St. Louis, MO

BEPS Impact on Manufacturing

International Tax Greece Highlights 2019

Transfer Pricing Country Summary Morocco

INVESTING THROUGH LUXEMBOURG

Innovation Tax Incentives March 2017

IP BOX TAX REGIMES. Rod Donnelly Thursday, September 14, 2017

Luxembourg Corporate Taxation

International Tax Ireland Highlights 2018

Flash News. PwC Luxembourg BEPS Series- What it means for the Luxembourg Asset Management industry

LEGISLATION DAY: CORPORATE TAX

GERMANY GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

United Kingdom diverted profits tax now in effect

IP rights post-brexit

Examining the impact of BEPS on the life sciences sector. Overview of select BEPS final reports and timing of implementation

wts study Global WTS PE Study A high-level overview of most discussed PE issues in EU, OECD and BRICS countries

International Tax Chile Highlights 2018

Transcription:

New tax regime for intellectual property rights On 4 th August 2017, the bill no. 7163 regarding the new tax regime for IP rights has been introduced in accordance with the previous announcement that had been made by the prime minister during the month of April. If the bill is passed, the announced measures would enter into force on 1 st January 2018. This regime is directly based on the so-called «modified nexus approach», outlined in action n 5 of the BEPS project of the OECD, according to which an exemption is directly linked to the substance of the R&D activity. Like the previous regime, an exemption of 80% of the net eligible income (in particular, royalties and capital gains upon disposal) related to a patent or copyrighted software is provided. Unlike the previous regime, brands, designs and models as well as domain names are excluded. However, due to the provisions of the BEPS plan, this 80% exemption would only be granted after the application of a ratio i.e., development costs directly linked to the IP rights / total costs, that would be used as an indicator of the substance of the activity in the country. Acquisition costs of the IP right or of the right to use said right, real estate costs and financing costs are not considered as costs directly linked to the development of an IP right. The bill has been drafted in a way that allows Luxembourg to preserve its competitivity by introducing an effective tax rate of 5.2% for eligible income while complying with the current international and European principles in tax matters. Like the previous regime, eligible IP rights will be exempt from net wealth tax. Eligible IP rights Based on the newly introduced article 50 ter I.T.L., these rights should have been constituted, developed or improved after 31 December 2007 in the framework of research and development activities. This

regime is limited to the following assets: inventions protected in accordance to domestic and international provisions in force under: patents; utility models; supplementary protection certificates related to patents on pharmaceutical and on phytopharmaceutical products; supplementary protection certificate extensions for pediatric medicine; plant variety certificates; orphan drug designations. software protected by copyright in accordance to domestic and international provisions in force. Marketing-related IP rights such as brands, designs, models and domain names are thus excluded. Eligible taxpayers Individuals and companies resident in Luxembourg as well as Luxembourg permanent establishments of companies located in the EEA (European Union, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) are eligible to the new regime. Eligible income royalties; capital gains on the disposal of IP rights; IP income embedded in the sale price of products or services, directly related to an eligible asset; judicial indemnities related to eligible assets. Eligible expenses These expenses must be directly linked to the constitution, development or improvement of eligible IP rights in the context of research and development activities: either carried on by the taxpayer himself; or carried on by a permanent establishment of the taxpayer located in the EEA, operational at the moment of the realization of the eligible income, if not already benefitting from a similar regime in its country; or paid by the taxpayer to a third-party undertaking; or paid by the taxpayer to an affiliated undertaking (in the sense of article 56 I.T.L.), provided that said affiliated undertaking transfers the amounts received to a third-party undertaking without realizing a profit margin. Acquisition costs of the IP right itself or of the right to use said right, interests and financing costs, real estate costs as well as other costs not directly linked to an eligible asset would thus be considered as non-eligible expenses. Computation of the adjusted net taxable basis: guidelines

In principle, eligible net income should be determined for each eligible asset on an individual basis. As an exception, the computation could be performed for a product or service or for a class of products or services in the presence of several eligible assets when the research and development activity is so complex that it renders an individual follow-up impossible (under conditions). Step 1: Determination of the net eligible income Step 2: Determination of the adjusted net eligible income The adjustments provided by the bill would be used to offset negative net income of previous years linked to the deduction / depreciation of R&D expenses in the absence of income with the positive net income for each asset on an individual basis, through a mechanism similar to the carry forward of tax losses. The computation of the adjustments to perform would be different based on the accounting treatment of expenses. Said expenses may either be booked in the profit and loss account (expenses deductible from the profit of the company) or be activated. The tax benefit granted would nevertheless be identical irrespective of the method that has been chosen. Step 3: Determination of the adjusted and compensated net eligible income The compensation mechanism would be used to offset negative net income linked to an eligible asset with positive net income linked to another eligible asset. A compensation could thus only happen when a taxpayer holds several eligible assets including both assets generating positive adjusted net eligible income and assets incurring negative adjusted net eligible income. Moreover, this compensation should be performed in a specific order and could never lead to the creation of a loss. An additional compensation mechanism would also be introduced for eligible assets not generating any income. Step 4: Determination of the prorated adjusted and compensated eligible income The biggest development regarding the new regime consists in the introduction of a prorate whose purpose is to ensure that the proportion of income benefiting the regime corresponds to the proportion of eligible expenses compared to the total expenses. The eligible expenses will act as an indicator ensuring that the taxpayer indeed carried on research and development activities and thus has a proper level of economic substance in Luxembourg. The 30% markup on eligible expenses has been introduced to reflect the significant participation of some taxpayers to the development / improvement of the IP right even when said IP right has been acquired or

if R&D activities have been sub-contracted. The prorate would thus be computed as follows: The partial exemption of 80% would then be applied on the amount resulting from this last computation. Other conditions Any taxpayer willing to benefit from the regime should be able to track its total expenses, its eligible expenses and its eligible income and should also be able to demonstrate the link between said expenses and income for each asset on an individual basis. An exception to this principle is nevertheless provided in the presence of numerous eligible assets when the research and development activity is so complex that the monitoring of each eligible asset is impossible to perform (under condition). In any case, the total eligible expenses and the total eligible income should be determined in accordance with the so-called arm s length principle laid down in articles 56 and 56 bis I.T.L. The administration would have the right to request the taxpayer to provide any document allowing to conclusively evidence the respect of these provisions. In this respect, the commentary attached to the provisions of the bill mentions extensive obligations of documentation ( obligations de documentation étendues ). Coexistence of two tax regimes The new regime will enter into force in 2018. As a reminder, the former IP regime of article 50bis I.T.L. was repealed and a grandfathering period has been provided to allow taxpayers to continue to benefit from said regime under conditions until 30 June 2021 for corporate income tax and municipal business tax purposes and until 1st January 2021 for net wealth tax purposes. The old and the new regime will therefore coexist as from 1st January 2018 until the end of the grandfathering period. Both regimes are nevertheless not cumulative. A taxpayer eligible to both regimes will have to irrevocably opt for one of them. EXPERTS EN FORMATIONS FISCALES ET SOCIALES MEMBER OF IF GROUP IF ADVISORY

45, RUE DES SCILLAS L-2529 HOWALD T +352 47 68 47-472 F +352 46 52 25 TRAINING@IFGROUP.LU WWW.IFGROUP.LU