BART s Business Model

Similar documents
Fare Policy. Discussion Document November 23, 2015

Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2010 July 1, 2009 June 30, 2010

3 RD QUARTER 2016 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE REPORT

3RD QUARTER November 2018

1ST QUARTER May 2018

4 TH QUARTER 2017 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE REPORT

3 RD QUARTER 2017 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE REPORT

1 ST QUARTER 2017 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE REPORT

4TH QUARTER 2016 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE REPORT

2 ND QUARTER 2017 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE REPORT

CHICAGO TITLE BAY AREA ZONE 4 RESIDENTIAL (1-4) SCHEDULE OF TITLE & ESCROW FEES. For use in the following counties:

The Price of Inaction

The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy Robert Puentes, Senior Research Manager

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview

Financial Feasibility of Contra Costa County Ferry Service,

FY18 Final Results Budget Outlook, FY20-22

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

Getting Metro Back on Track

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

MEMORANDUM. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors. Michael T. Burns General Manager. DATE: August 4, 2008

Public Meeting of the Mayors Council (Items 2, 3 and 4)

Title VI Approval of Major Service Change, Disparate Impact and Disproportionate Burden

Requested Budget Analysis: Operating Contingency Reserve

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

Executive Summary - Fiscal Year 2016 Valley Metro Rail Preliminary Annual Operating and Capital Budget

Financial Practices and Reporting Review Committee. Committee Meeting July 15, 2011

FY17 FY16 Valley Metro RPTA Sources of Funds FY17 vs FY16

Regional Transportation District FasTracks Financial Plan. April 22,

TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012)

Caltrain Service Preparing for FY2012 Caltrain Benefits Environment, Economy, Quality of Life

AD HOC FINANCIAL STABILITY COMMITTEE WORKSHOP AGENDA

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M Select a draft Sounder fare structure change and fare increase for public review and comment

TAXICAB INDUSTRY REPORT

Fair Share: Allocation of Transit O&M Costs Between Multiple Partners

Total Operating Activities for FY17 are $56.9 million, an increase of $5.1M or 9.8% from FY16.

Subject: Creation of an Eco Pass

The Future Scenarios

MARTA 2009 Budget Summary Review

Report by Finance and Administration Committee (B) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 3 Focus. November 2016 San Francisco, California

Memorandum. Agenda Item 2. TO: Conunission. DA TE: December 8, FR: Executive Director. RE: Regional Measure 3. Background

FY2011 Budget Forum. District of Columbia. October 19, 2009

Fare evasion at NYCT

2013 Triennial Customer Survey Results

DOWNLOAD OR READ : PROPOSED FIVE YEAR TRANSIT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS PROPOSED ANNUAL PROGRAM AND BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Draft SFMTA Strategic Plan 11/14/2011, San Francisco California

Operating Budget Report

Notice of Public Hearing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Transit-Oriented Development Demand Analysis

Chapter 9 Financial Considerations. 9.1 Introduction

Proposed Annual Financing Plan 2013

Getting Metro Back on Track

PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2011 BUDGET. Testimony of. Richard Sarles, General Manager. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.

FY2017 Budget Discussion

Operating Budget. Third Quarter Financial Report (July 2005 March 2006)

University Link LRT Extension

JPB CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMTTEE San Mateo County Transit District Administrative Building 1250 San Carlos Avenue San Carlos, CA 94070

CTA 2007 Contingency Plan

Alameda CTC Mass Transit Program Implementation Guidelines

Proposed FY2012 Operating Budget

In their own words. From the Orange County Transportation Authority:

VALLEY METRO RPTA FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Finance & Administration Committee Information Item IV-A October 9, 2014 Momentum Update

VALLEY METRO RAIL FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

May 1, Dear Board of Directors:

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

AGENDA DATE: April 17, 2019 ITEM NO. 12. SUBJECT: Consider Action to Increase the Compensation of Zone 7 Board Members

Transit Development Plan (FY ) Executive Summary

FY06 Operating Budget. FY2006 Proposed Operating Budget. Final Summary for Board Referral

VTA Short Range Transit Plan

Review FY09 Subsidy Allocation

CHAPTER 7: Financial Plan

System Performance Summary for FY 2016/17 Fixed Route

Operating Budget. Second Quarter Financial Report

Funding. Leading the Nation in Transportation Excellence

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Rail Modernization Study REPORT TO CONGRESS. April Prepared by: Federal Transit Administration

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Travel Forecasting for Corridor Alternatives Analysis

FY2013 Preliminary Operating Budget

CoreLogic S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index Update A Compass Report for the San Francisco Metro Area, January 29, 2019

Public Hearing on Peak Fares for Peak Service

FY METROLINK BUDGET AND LACMTA'S COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM

Second Quarter One South Market. Earnings Release & Supplemental Financial Information. San Jose, CA 312 Units In Lease-Up

Metro s Path Forward. A comprehensive approach toward reform. July 26, 2017

Santa Cruz METRO Board of Directors September 12, 2014 Alex Clifford, CEO

Market and Economic Briefing. Washington Area Economy: Performance and Outlook

GRADING CALIFORNIA S RAIL STATION NEIGHBORHOODS

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 2 Focus. July 2015 San Francisco, California

Analysis of Transit 20 Year Capital Forecasts: FTA TERM Model vs. Transit Estimates

Strategic Performance measures

Metra Board of Directors. Board Meeting September 16, 2011

Safety and Operations Committee. Information Item III-B. January 24, 2019

J.P. Morgan Public Finance Transportation & Utility Investor Forum

FY2017 Budget Work Session

% Share of the overall budget increase Fixed Route 1,407, % 64% Paratransit 106, % 4.8% WHEELS on. prior year

Transcription:

BART s Business Model July 31, 2018 What is Public Transit s Business Model?

BART Background Basic Facts Regional rail rapid transit Elected Board of Directors: 9 Comprised of 3 Counties: - Alameda, Contra Costa & San Francisco - Serves San Mateo - Will serve Santa Clara in 2019 414,166 weekday riders (FY18) 121 revenue route miles 5 lines, plus Oakland Airport 48 stations 48,000+ parking spaces July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 2

BART Background Basic Facts FY19 Adopted Budget Operating: Capital: $ 922 M $1,355 M Rail Farebox Ratio (FTA FY14): (Fare Revenue/Operating Costs) SF/OAK (BART) 78% NYC (NYCTA) 63% Wash DC (WMATA) 62% Boston (MTBA) 60% Philadelphia (SEPTA) 55% July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 3

Better BART, Better Market Street 2/3rds of BART trips begin or end on Market Street Weekday Trips by Sub-Area 52%: Transbay 27%: intra-west Bay 21%: intra-east Bay Weekday Ridership (FY10 FY16) Growth: 29% Growth: ~100,000 June 2015 433,000 July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 4

BART s Business Model Related to the BART Strategic Plan Core: Related to BART s Vision and Mission Seamless Mobility Move people safely and reliably Reduce Risk (safety/service/reputational/financial) How do today s decisions affect BART s long-term outlook? Dynamic: Related to BART s current and future environment Improve Customer Experience Generate Revenue Reduce Costs/Cost Neutral July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 5

BART Strategic Plan Framework

Strategic Plan and FY19 Budget Strategic Plan function: Linking Policy guidance, Risk information, and Budget decisions Strategic Plan provides policy direction to Budget process & decisionmaking July 31, 2018 7

Ten-Year Financial Outlook FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 $10 $0 -$10 -$20 Millions -$30 -$40 -$50 -$60 -$70 July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 8

BART DAS, July 2014 Riders by Station, by Time of Day 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 Combined Station Entries & Exits in 15 Minute Increments Montgomery Embarcadero MT EM PL CC 19th BK 16th 12th 24th 1000 500 0 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 MA BP ED PH July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 9

The Before and After Effects of BART Transbay Service July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 10

Recent BART Ridership Trends Annual Trips (millions) 101.0 103.7 110.8 117.8 117.1 126.0 128.5 124.2 120.6 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 11

Rail Ridership Trends At Peer Agencies Year-to-year % change (Calendar Year 2016 vs 2015) 0.2% -1.3% -0.2% -0.8% -4.7% -4.5% -10.4% BART WMATA (DC) MARTA (Atlanta) CTA (Chicago) MBTA (Boston) NY MTA SEPTA (SE Penn) Note: These data are based on unlinked passenger trips. Source: http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/documents/ridership/2016-q4-ridership-apta.pdf Unlinked passenger trips July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 12

Transbay AM Floating Peak Hour, Peak Direction Ridership 30,000 27,500 25,000 22,500 20,000 17,500 15,000 12,500 10,000 7,500 5,000 2,500 0 Peak Hour Ridership 2015 2016 2017 2018 July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 13

Ridership by Day of Week July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 14

Ridership Trends July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 15

Fare Revenue $600 Annual Fare Revenue (millions) $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $49 $41 $43 $35 $40 $274 $278 $291 $299 $318 $53 $54 $9 $353 $353 $63 $60 $61 $60 $27 $33 $39 $19 $383 $399 $392 $393 Date of Increase Average Increase 1/1/2006 3.7% 1/1/2008 5.4% 7/1/2009 6.1% 7/1/2012 1.4% 1/1/2014 5.2% 1/1/2016 3.4% 1/1/2018 2.7% $0 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 FY18 Est Core System CPI-based Fare Increase SFO Extension July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 16

Capital Sources Total excludes $7M in reimbursable capital expenses 17

FY17-31 CIP Major Investment Programs Need and Funding Capital Asset Renewal Programs Big 3 (including TCMP) Core Capacity (Excluding TCMP) Access Enhancement and Station Mod BART Metro Earthquake Safety Program System Expansion Other Needs Need and Funding (millions) $- $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 Committed Funds Discretionary Funds Funding Gap July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 18

Capital Budget History July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 19

Operating to Capital Allocations Operating Expenditures ($M) $900 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $63 $24 $428 $70 $34 $467 $66 $68 $68 $68 $50 $8 $34 $59 $498 $524 $498 $486 $62 $64 $524 $58 $62 $113 $84 $561 $569 $56 $49 $148 $144 $610 $637 $50 $123 $690 $51 $127 $743 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% % Operating Funds Allocated to Capital/Access $- FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 Budget Operating Expense Debt Service Allocations to Capital, Access, and Reserves % of Operating Funds Allocated to Capital/Access 0% July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 20

BART s Business Model Related to the BART Strategic Plan Core: Related to BART s Vision and Mission Seamless Mobility Move people safely and reliably Reduce Risk (safety/service/reputational/financial) How do today s decisions affect BART s long-term outlook? Dynamic: Related to BART s current and future environment Improve Customer Experience Generate Revenue Reduce Costs/Cost Neutral July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 21

Near Term Focus and Issues Operating Essentials Open BART to Antioch May 2018 Integrate New Rail Cars into revenue service Staff an expanded Hayward Maintenance Complex Initiatives to Improve Customer Experience, Reduce Costs, Generate Revenue Quality of Life Homelessness Cleanliness Fare Evasion Safety & security Administrative process efficiency improvements Access and Parking improvements July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 22

Ridership and Employment Trends BART Ridership vs SF-Oak-Hayward MSA Employment 2,500,000 2,400,000 2,300,000 2,200,000 2,100,000 2,000,000 1,900,000 1,800,000 500,000 480,000 460,000 440,000 420,000 400,000 380,000 360,000 340,000 320,000 300,000 SF-Oakland-Hayward MSA Employment Avg Weekday Ridership 12 per. Mov. Avg. (SF-Oakland-Hayward MSA Employment) 12 per. Mov. Avg. (Avg Weekday Ridership) July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 23

Non-Passenger Revenue Opportunities Transit Oriented Development Advertising The BART Digital Railway and Digital Strategy July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 24

Status Station Total Units Affordable Office Retail % Affordable Units (SF) (SF) Castro Valley Current (1993) TOD Portfolio 96 96 100% Fruitvale Phase I (2004) 47 10 21% 27,000 37,000 Pleasant Hill Phase I (2008) 422 84 20% 35,590 Hayward (1998) 170 0 0% Ashby (2011) 0 0 0% 80,000 Richmond Phase I (2004) 132 66 50% 9,000 MacArthur Ph I (2016) 90 90 100% San Leandro Ph I (2017) 115 115 100% 5,000 1,000 West Dublin (2013) 309 0 0% East Dublin (2008) 240 0 0% South Hayward Ph I (2017) 354 152 43% TOTAL COMPLETED 1975 613 31% 112,000 82,590 Completed Construction/ Planned MacArthur Ph II (begins 2017 & 2018) 787 56 7% 39,100 San Leandro Ph II (2017-2019) 85 85 100% Walnut Creek (began 2017) 596 0 0% Coliseum Phase I (2017-2019) 110 55 50% West Pleasanton (2017-2019) 0 0 0% 410,000 Pleasant Hill Block C (begin 2018) 200 0 0% Fruitvale Phase IIA (begin 2018) 94 92 98% TOTAL UNDER CONST. & PLANNED 1872 288 15% 410,000 39,100 GRAND TOTAL 3847 901 23% 522,000 121,690

Revenue from Transit-Oriented Development Revenue is long term: from choices made 10-20 years ago Past priorities: ridership, parking replacement, long term revenue City Redevelopment played major role in most completed projects Decisions made today could affect revenue in 7-10 years 2018 BART TOD-Generated Revenue Land Lease/Sale $740k Participation* Ridership $184K ~ $3 Million *Transit Benefit Fees, Revenue Sharing for Retail, Parking Garages July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 26

Revenue Share Opportunity $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $- $.5 M $10.0 M $9.0 M October 1, 2018 - June 30, 2019 $15.2 M $15.1 M $15.1 M $15.0 M $15.1 M $11.3 M $11.6 M $4.7 M $6.0 M $2.4 M $12.0 M $12.0 M $12.0 M $12.0 M $13.0 M $14.0 M $15.0 M $16.0 M $17.0 M $18.0 M FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 BART Revenue Share Opportunity (based on Outfront projection) Signing Bonus Payment to BART (Guaranteed) Minimum Annual Payment to BART (Guaranteed) Based on OUTFRONT net revenue projection, total estimated payments to BART could be approximately $272M, of which $160M is guaranteed. July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 27

Digital Railway Current State FY16 $8.5M Fiber & Cellular Revenue Underground Cellular Network Above Ground Cellular Towers Dark Fiber FY17 $9.7M Fiber & Cellular Revenue July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 28

Digital Railway Business Units July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 29

Areas to Watch Potential for further ridership declines Ballot measure to repeal SB1, reducing BART s STA allocation Next Economic Downturn Impacts of National Policies July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 30

Concluding Remarks Discussion and Questions July 31, 2018 SPUR: What is Public Transit s Business Model? 31