Deconstructing Household Wealth Trends in the United States, 1983 to 2016 First WID World Conference, Paris, France. Edward N. Wolff December 5,2017

Similar documents
Recent Trends in Household Wealth, : the Irresistible Rise of Household Debt

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HOUSEHOLD WEALTH TRENDS IN THE UNITED STATES, : WHAT HAPPENED OVER THE GREAT RECESSION? Edward N.

Working Paper No Changes in Household Wealth in the 1980s and 1990s in the U.S.

The Asset Price Meltdown and the Wealth of the Middle Class Edward N. Wolff New York University January 2013

Building Wealth for Families and Employees

Household wealth and the measurement of economic well-being in the United States

econstor Make Your Publications Visible.

Income and Assets of Medicare Beneficiaries,

Demographics, Wealth and Opportunity

Retirement Insecurity The Income Shortfalls Awaiting the Soon-to-Retire

Poverty and Income Distribution

Wealth Inequality Reading Summary by Danqing Yin, Oct 8, 2018

Demographic Drivers. Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University 11

The Demographics of Wealth

$11.61 $17.60 $11.60 $17.60

Appendix A. Additional Results

Homeownership, the Great Recession, and Wealth: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finance Michal Grinstein-Weiss Clinton Key

Wealth Inequality and the American Dream

The Retirement Wealth of the Baby Boom Generation. Edward N. Wolff* New York University March 2006

Page 1. Long-term Economic Growth

Trends in household wealth dynamics, Elena Gouskova and Frank Stafford. September 30, 2002

Distribution of Family Wealth,

The Decline in Saving: What Can We Learn From Survey Data? Barry Bosworth and Lisa Bell Brookings Institution

Metro Houston Population Forecast

Nest Egg for Retirement? The Realities of Asset Holdings for Older Adults

The distribution of wealth in the United States and implications for a net worth tax

401(k) PLANS AND RACE

Cross-Sectional Wealth and Financial Wealth

Income Inequality, Mobility and Turnover at the Top in the U.S., Gerald Auten Geoffrey Gee And Nicholas Turner

The impact of the recession on the wealth of older immigrant and native households in the United States

SLUGGISH HOUSEHOLD GROWTH

Credit Research Center Seminar

The Effect of the Great Recession on Black-White Wealth and Mobility. Liana E. Fox Columbia University

Rifle city Demographic and Economic Profile

CEPR CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH

the poverty and inequality report

The Inequality Lab. Discussion Paper

Wealth and Poverty in the U.S. (info from Poverty Rates by Race and Hispanic Origin: 1959 to 2001

The Growing Longevity Gap between Rich and Poor and Its Impact on Redistribution through Social Security

The deflation of the housing bubble which started in 2006 pushed the U.S. economy into recession by the

Poverty and Income Inequality in Scotland: 2013/14 A National Statistics publication for Scotland

Whither Retirement Strategies?

HIGHLIGHTS. Public Policy Brief ASSET POVERTY IN THE UNITED STATES. The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College

PROJECTING POVERTY RATES IN 2020 FOR THE 62 AND OLDER POPULATION: WHAT CHANGES CAN WE EXPECT AND WHY?

Changes in the Distribution of After-Tax Wealth: Has Income Tax Policy Increased Wealth Inequality?

Demographic and Economic Characteristics of Children in Families Receiving Social Security

Net Government Expenditures and the Economic Well-Being of the Elderly in the United States,

From Crisis to Transition Demographic trends and American housing futures, with lessons from Texas

Wealth Inequality in the Netherlands: Observed vs Capitalized Wealth

The Growing Divide and Its Consequences. The Inaugural Annual Report from the Legal Services of New Jersey Poverty Research Institute July 2012

Distribution of Household Wealth in the U.S.: 2000 to 2011

Inheritances and the distribution of wealth or whatever happened to the great inheritance boom?

Methodology behind the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta s Labor Force Participation Dynamics

The Distribution of US Wealth, Capital Income and Returns since Emmanuel Saez (UC Berkeley) Gabriel Zucman (LSE and UC Berkeley)

Married? Husband's name Wife's name Mailing Address:

Economic Standard of Living

Intermediate Macroeconomic Theory. Costas Azariadis. Costas Azariadis. Lecture 3: Productivity and Labor

FIGURE I.1 / Per Capita Gross Domestic Product and Unemployment Rates. Year

Household Income and Asset Distribution in Korea

Gender, Wealth and Inequality in the U.S. Mariko Chang, PhD

City of Modesto Homeowner Rehabilitation Program

Update on Homeownership Wealth Trajectories Through the Housing Boom and Bust

Equitable. Growth. Net worth taxes. What they are and how they work. Greg Leiserson, Will McGrew, and Raksha Kopparam

Estate Inventory Form

middle class one, where ordinary people, working hard, obeying the rules, behaving decently,

Florida State University. From the SelectedWorks of Patrick L. Mason. Patrick Leon Mason, Florida State University. Winter February, 2009

WILL WORKSHEET. 1. Husband s Name: Social Sec. No. Birthplace: Birth Date: 2. Wife s Name: Social Sec. No. Birthplace: Birth Date:

Redistribution under OASDI: How Much and to Whom?

Research Report Report Number 715, August 2013

Patterns of Unemployment

The coverage of young children in demographic surveys

Lynn Todman, PhD. Executive Director of Population Health Lakeland Health

Diversity in Retirement Wealth Accumulation

Cumberland Comprehensive Plan - Demographics Element Town Council adopted August 2003, State adopted June 2004 II. DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

Community and Economic Development

Notes and Definitions Numbers in the text, tables, and figures may not add up to totals because of rounding. Dollar amounts are generally rounded to t

Online Appendix of. This appendix complements the evidence shown in the text. 1. Simulations

Who Are the Asset Poor?: Levels, Trends, and Composition,

4 Distribution of Income, Earnings and Wealth

Population & Demographic Analysis

Working Paper No The Adequacy of Retirement Resources among the Soon-to-Retire,

Economic Standard of Living

A Consistent Data Series to Evaluate Growth and Inequality in the National Accounts

ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH ISAAC CDBG HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

Roundtable on Income Equality, Social Inclusion and Mobility OECD Paris

Differences in the Onset of Formal Retirement Saving between Native and Foreign Born Individuals: An Event History Analysis

Economics 001 Principles of Microeconomics

PROJECTING POVERTY RATES IN 2020 FOR THE 62 AND OLDER POPULATION: WHAT CHANGES CAN WE EXPECT AND WHY?

Why Financial Inclusion Matters: The Household Balance Sheet Perspective

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM. Need for. Accessible Unit 60% 50% ACC Other Y/N. Current Address: Apt.

November Impact Series. Credit Suisse Research. Wealth patterns among the top 5% of African-Americans

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (2017) All rights reserved

Aging Seminar Series:

Working Paper No. 311

Asset Inventory. This worksheet will help you:

Many studies have documented the long term trend of. Income Mobility in the United States: New Evidence from Income Tax Data. Forum on Income Mobility

Status of Working Families in Indiana, 2015 Report

Economic Standard of Living

Inequality in developed countries - how good is a good state. Åsa Hansson Lunds universitet

A LIFE-CYCLE PERSPECTIVE ON THE GREAT RECESSION S EFFECTS ON THE MIDDLE CLASS

Transcription:

Deconstructing Household Wealth Trends in the United States, 1983 to 2016 First WID World Conference, Paris, France Edward N. Wolff December 5,2017

Asset Price Changes, 2001-2016 (constant dollars) % Change 2001-2007 % Change 2007-2010 % Change 2010-2013 % Change 2013-2016 Homes 18.9-24.0 7.7 18.4 Stocks 5.7-26.0 39.0 27.9

What Is Wealth? My Standard Definition. Assets: (1) the gross value of owner-occupied housing. (2) other real estate owned by the household. (3) cash and demand deposits. (4) time and savings deposits, certificates of deposit, and money market accounts;

What Is Wealth (cont.)? (5) government bonds, corporate bonds, foreign bonds, and other financial securities. (6) the cash surrender value of life insurance plans. (7) the cash surrender value of pension plans, including IRAs, Keogh, and 401(k) plans.

What Is Wealth (cont.)? (8) corporate stock and mutual funds. (9) net equity in unincorporated businesses. and (10) equity in trust funds. Total liabilities are the sum of. (1) mortgage debt. (2) consumer debt, including auto loans. and (3) other debt, including educational loans.

What Is Wealth (cont.)? NOT INCLUDED: 1. Value of vehicles (standard FRB tables INCLUDE this). 2. Other consumer durables. 3. The value of future social security benefits the family may receive upon retirement (usually referred to as "social security wealth"), as well as the value of retirement benefits from private pension plans ("pension wealth").

Sources of Wealth Data 1. 1983, 1989, 1992, 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, and 2016 Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) conducted by the Federal Reserve Board. 2. Each survey consists of a core representative sample combined with a high-income supplement.

Selected Data Results. 1. Trends in Mean and Median Wealth 2. Inequality of Wealth 3. Composition of Wealth 4. The Effects of Leverage 5. Racial / Ethnic Wealth Differences 6. Wealth Differences by Age Group

800.0 700.0 Figure 1. Mean and Median Net Worth, 1983-2016 (in thousands, 2016 dollars) 667.6 620.5 600.0 515.2 546.9 521.0 524.1 500.0 400.0 313.0 358.6 348.6 322.1 397.9 Median Net Worth 300.0 Mean Net Worth 200.0 100.0 80.4 86.1 73.4 71.9 89.3 99.6 99.0 118.6 66.5 65.8 78.1 0.0 1983 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 Year

90.0 80.0 70.0 Figure 2. Mean and Median Household Income, 1983-2016 (in thousands, 2016 dollars) 78.9 72.7 70.7 67.4 81.7 81.0 79.5 76.8 77.5 83.1 60.0 50.0 49.4 60.2 55.7 53.0 55.0 59.0 59.1 58.1 60.0 56.0 55.2 59.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 1983 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 Year Median Income Mean Income

Table 1. Wealth and Income Trends, 1983-2007 (constant dollars) % Change % Change % Change 1983-2001 2001-2007 1983-2007 Median NW 23.9 19.1 47.5 Mean NW 64.6 20.4 98.2 Median Income 19.7 1.6 21.6

Table 1 (cont.) Wealth and Income Trends, 2001-2016 (constant dollars) % Change % Change % Change 2001-2007 2007-2010 2010-2016 Median NW 19.1-43.9-17.4 Mean NW 20.4-16.0 28.2 Median Income 1.6-6.7 5.5

Figure 3. Percentage of Households with Zero or Negative Net Worth, 1962-2016 25.0 22.0 21.8 21.8 21.2 19.0 18.2 17.9 18.0 18.5 18.0 17.6 17.0 18.6 16.0 15.6 15.5 13.0 10.0 1962 1969 1983 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 Year

90.0 Figure 4 The Size Distribution of Net Worth (NW) and Income, 2016 (Percentage Shares) 80.0 70.0 60.0 NW 50.0 40.0 Income 30.0 Share of HHs 20.0 10.0 0.0 Top 1.0% Next 4.0% Next 15% Bottom 80%

Figure 5. Wealth and Income Inequality, 1983-2016 (Gini coefficients) 0.950 0.900 0.850 0.800 0.750 Net Worth 0.700 0.650 0.600 0.550 0.500 Income 0.450 0.400 Year

Table 2. Wealth Inequality Trends, 2007-2016 NW Shares 2007 2010 2016 Top 20% 85.0 88.6 89.9 Next 20% 10.9 9.5 8.2 Middle 20% 4.0 2.7 2.4 Bottom 40% 0.2-0.8-0.5 Gini Coeff. 0.834 0.866 0.877

Table 2 (cont). Income Inequality Trends, 2006-2015 Income Shares 2006 2009 2015 Top 20% 61.4 59.1 64.0 Next 20% 17.8 18.7 16.8 Middle 20% 11.1 14.9 10.2 Bottom 40% 9.6 7.3 9.0 Gini Coeff. 0.574 0.549 0.598

Figure 6 Composition of Household Wealth, 1983 and 2016 (percent of gross assets) 100.0 95.1 90.0 80.0 1983 70.0 60.0 68.4 2016 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 30.1 25.1 17.4 15.6 15.9 20.8 33.8 30.5 15.1 14.3 23.8 16.5 20.9 34.4 10.0 6.7 0.0 1.5

140.0 Figure 7. Composition of Household Wealth by Wealth Class, 2016 (percent of gross assets) 120.0 120.4 100.0 80.0 88.9 Top 1% 60.0 61.9 58.9 Next 19% 49.0 46.1 40.0 20.0 25.6 22.4 16.6 31.4 18.6 24.5 35.0 18.8 33.3 15.4 26.5 Middle 3 wealth quintiles 7.6 7.78.5 4.6 6.0 3.9 7.9 2.4 10.1 6.4 0.0

Table 6. Composition of Wealth of Middle 3 Wealth Quintiles, 1983, 2007, 2010 and 2016 Ratio (percent) 1983 2007 2010 2016 Debt/NW 37.4 61.1 69.2 58.9 Debt/Inc. 66.9 156.7 134.3 120.4 Home Equity/Tot al Assets Mort.Debt / House Value 43.8 34.8 31.4 33.3 28.8 46.6 51.5 46.1

Table 7. Average Debt, All Households, 2007-2016 (1000s, 2016$) Mort. Debt Other Debt Total Debt % Chng 2007 2010 2016 2007-2010 % Chng 2010-2016 % Chng 2007-2016 83.9 79.7 66.0-5.0-17.2-21.3 28.5 27.8 29.5-2.6 6.4 3.7 112.4 107.5 95.5-4.4-11.1-15.0

Table 7 (cont)average Debt, Middle Class, 2007-2016 (constant dollars) % Change % Change % Change 2007-2010 2010-2016 2007-2016 Mort. Debt -23.1-10.6-31.3 Other Debt -31.6 19.0-18.6 Total Debt -24.8-5.2-28.7

Table 8. Asset Ownership Rates, All Households, 2010 and 2016 (percent) Asset 2010 2016 Change Homes 67.2 63.7-3.5 Pension Accounts 50.4 52.1 1.7 Businesses 12.1 11.4-0.7 Total Stocks 46.9 49.3 2.4

Table 8 (cont.) Asset Ownership Rates, Middle Class, 2007, 2010 and 2016 (percent) Asset 2007 2010 2016 Change Homes 76.9 68.0 67.0-9.9 Pension Accounts 53.4 45.8 48.9-4.5 Business 8.8 8.2 7.8-1.0 Total Stocks 47.8 41.4 45.0-2.8

Table 11a. Average Annual Rate of Return by Period and Wealth Class, 2001-2016 (percent) 2001-2007 2007-2010 2010-2016 Gross Assets Top 1% 3.86-6.37 5.75 Middle 2.95-7.06 4.15 Net Worth Top 1% 4.03-6.52 5.96 Middle 5.95-10.6 7.82 Difference 1.92-4.03 1.86

Decomposition Analysis 1. The basic equation is: (1) ΔW ct W ct - W c,t-1 = r ct W ct-1 + s ct Y ct + G ct. where W ct = net worth (in constant dollars) for age (or birth) cohort c at time t, r = real rate of return on wealth, Y = household income (in constant dollars), s = savings rate out of household income Y, and G = net inheritances and gifts (in constant dollars).

Decomposition Analysis (cont.) 2. We can directly estimate ROR effect: r ct W ct-1 3. The residual consists of (a) Net wealth transfers (generally small) (b) Net savings (c) Leakages: (i) charitable contributions; (ii) someone could die in this time interval and pay estate taxes or leave a charitable bequest (iii) outflows if an American resident emigrates from the U.S. and takes wealth out of the U.S. (d) Additions: (i) immigrants bring new wealth in.

Decomposition Analysis (cont.) 4. The identity of the households will, in general, change over time. The two main sources are deaths and the formation of new households from marriage, children moving out of the home, and the like. 5. Changes in mean wealth over time will also be affected by changes in the household count, which may come about from deaths, the formation of new households, emigration, and immigration.

Decomposition Analysis (cont.) 6. The comparison becomes more complicated when we consider wealth classes. The same issues of attrition and new entrants apply. In addition, households may shift their wealth class over time. For example, the households in the top 1% say in 1983 may not be the same as those in the top 1% in 1989. There is a regression to the mean over time, and some households in the top 1% in 1983 may have slipped to the next 19% say. 7. In the case of the top 1%,, if we call ROR the change in the mean wealth of the top one percent emanating only from capital appreciation on initial wealth, then ROR / ΔW only is a lower bound on ROR / ΔW*, and the contribution of the ROR effect to the change in mean wealth over the period will be biased downward.

Table 12. Decomposition of the Percentage Change in Median Net Worth, 2001-2016 2001-2007 2007-2010 2010-2016 Capital Gains 39.8-27.1 52.7 Residual -20.7-16.8-35.3 Net Worth 19.1-43.9 17.4

Table 12a. Decomposition of the Change in the Ratio of the Mean Wealth of the Top One Percent to Median Net Worth, 2001-2016 2001-2007 2007-2010 2010-2016 Actual Change Capital Gains 8.2 91.5 65.8-16.4 23.3-22.2 Residual 24.6 68.2 88.0

Figure 11. Ratio of Mean Net Worth between Racial and Ethnic Groups, 1983-2013 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 Black/White Hispanic/White 0.10 1983 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 Year

Table 13. Ratios of NW, Income, and Home Ownership between Blacks and Whites Mean NW Median NW Median Income Home Ownership Rate 2001 0.14 0.10 0.57 0.64 2007 0.19 0.06 0.60 0.65 2010 0.14 0.05 0.59 0.64 2013 0.13 0.01 0.56 0.60 2016 0.14 0.02 0.58 0.61

Table 13a.Ratio of NW, Income, and Homes between Hispanics and (Non-Hisp.) Whites Mean NW Median NW Median Income Home Ownership Rate 2001 0.17 0.03 0.55 0.60 2007 0.26 0.06 0.70 0.66 2010 0.15 0.01 0.67 0.63 2013 0.15 0.02 0.59 0.60 2016 0.19 0.04 0.65 0.63

Table 14. Portfolio Composition by Race and Ethnicity, 2007 Whites Blacks Hispanics House value/ gross assets 30.8 54.0 52.5 Debt / equity ratio 15.4 55.3 51.1 Debt / income ratio 109.0 152.2 187.9 Mortgage debt / house value 32.4 49.4 45.2 Annual Rate of Return on Net Worth (percent) 2001-2007 3.87 6.00 6.51 2007-2010 -7.07-9.92-10.76 2010-2013 6.12 7.14 7.48 2013-2016 6.32 8.53 8.33

Table 14a. Decomposition of the Change in the Ratio of Mean Wealth between Black and White Households 2001-2007 2007-2010 2010-2016 Actual Change Capital Gains 0.046-0.045 0.001 0.019-0.015 0.013 Residual 0.026-0.029-0.012

Table 14b. Decomposition of the Change in the Ratio of Mean Wealth between Hispanic and White Households 2001-2007 2007-2010 2010-2016 Actual Change Capital Gains 0.089-0.107 0.036 0.030-0.027 0.015 Residual 0.060-0.080 0.021

Figure 12. Ratio of Mean Net Worth of Young Age groups to Overall Mean Net Worth, 1983-2016 0.75 0.65 0.55 0.45 Under 35 35-44 0.35 0.25 0.15 0.05 Year

Table 15. Composition of Household Wealth by Age Class, 2007 All Under 35 35-44 House value / gross assets 32.8 54.3 43.7 Debt / equity ratio 18.1 92.7 41.3 Debt / income ratio 118.7 167.5 156.5 Mortgage debt / house value 34.9 65.4 51.4 Annual Rate of Return on Net Worth (in percent) 2001-2007 4.04 7.90 5.63 2007-2010 -7.28-13.49-9.56 2010-2013 6.20 10.70 7.50 2013-2016 6.46 11.99 8.06

Table 15a. Decomposition of the Change in the Ratio of Mean Wealth between Age Group Under 35 and All Households 2001-2007 2007-2010 2010-2016 Actual Change Capital Gains -0.025-0.061-0.018 0.051-0.053 0.079 Residual -0.076-0.008 0.098

Table 15b. Decomposition of the Change in the Ratio of Mean Wealth between Age Group 35-44 and All Households 2001-2007 2007-2010 2010-2016 Actual Change Capital Gains -0.068-0.158-0.020 0.064-0.074 0.096 Residual -0.132-0.085 0.116

A. Principal Findings for the Great Recession, 2007-2010 1. Housing prices fall by 24% in real terms. 2. Stock prices down by 26% in real terms. 3. Median wealth plummets by 44% in real terms (with vehicles by 38%). 4. Mean wealth down by only 16%. 5. Median income falls by 6.4 percent. 6. Mean income down by 5.0 percent.

Principal Findings- Recession (cont.) 7. Negative rate of return (ROR) explains 62% of decline in median NW; residual explained 38%. 8. Wealth inequality spikes upward: (a) Gini coefficient rises from 0.834 to 0.866. (b) Share of top 20 percent up from 85 to 89 percent. 9. ROR differential explained 25%, residual explained 75%. 10. Income inequality falls: (a) Gini coefficient falls from 0.574 to 0.549. (b) Share of top 1% down from 21.3 to 17.2 percent.

Principal Findings - Recession (cont.) 11. Racial disparity in wealth holdings spikes upward, with the ratio of mean wealth between blacks and whites dropping from 0.19 to 0.14. 12. ROR differential explained 35%, residual explained 65%. 13. Hispanic families get hammered, with the ratio of mean wealth plunging from 0.26 to 0.15. 14. ROR differential explained 26%, residual explained 74%.

Principal Findings - Recession (cont.) 15. Young families also get pummeled, with the ratio of mean wealth between household under age 35 and all households plunging from 0.17 to 0.11, and that between age group 35-44 and all from 0.58 to 0.42. 16. ROR differential explained 87% and residual explained 13% for age group under 35 and 46% and 54% respectively for age group 35-44.

B. Principal Findings for the Recovery, 2010-2016 1. Home prices increase by 26% in real terms. 2. Stock prices up by 60% in real terms. 3. Median wealth up by 17% in real terms, though still 34% below 2007 peak. 4. Mean wealth up by 28% and above previous 2007 peak. 5. Median income rises by 5.5 percent, though still slightly below 2007 level. 6. Mean income up by 8.3 percent and above 2007 level.

Principal Findings - Recovery (cont.) 7. ROR explains 304% of gain in median NW; residual explained -204%. 8. Wealth inequality rises somewhat: (a) Gini coefficient up from 0.866 to 0.877. (b) Share of top 20% up slightly from 89.6% to 89.9%. (c) But share of top 1% up sharply from 35.1% to 39.6%. 9. ROR differential explained -34%, residual explained 134%. 10. Income inequality up sharply: (a) Gini coefficient from 0.549 to 0.598. (b) Share of top 1% up from 17.2 to 23.5 percent.

Principal Findings - Recovery (cont.) 11. Racial disparity in wealth holdings showed little change. 12. Ratio of mean wealth between Hispanic and white families recovered from 0.15 to 0.19. 13. ROR differential explained 41%, residual explained 59% of increase in Hispanic/white ratio.

Principal Findings - Recovery (cont.) 14. The relative wealth of both the under 35 and the 35-44 age groups continued to deteriorate between 2010 and 2016. 15. ROR differential explained -432% and residual explained 332% for relative decline in mean wealth of age group under 35 and -490% and 390% respectively for age group 35-44.