SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: January 20, 2016 SUPPLEMENTAL

Similar documents
SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

AFSCME MEF/CEO AND CITY OF SAN JOSE MEF & CEO JOINT BARGAINING CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS 2015 PACKAGE PROPOSAL #3

Memorandum. FROM: Julia H. Cooper TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. SUBJECT: BANKING SERVICES REP DATE: June 23, 2017 REASON FOR ADDENDUM

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND. FROM: Toni J. Taber, CM1 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. DATE: November 5, Approval of Adjusted Campaign Contribution Limits.

CITY OF SAN JOSE VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEE BENEFICIARY ASSOCIATION PLANS. Independent Auditor s Report, and Basic Financial Statements

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Memorandum of Agreement CWALocall180 and the City of New York

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY

SUBJECT: CITY OF SAN JOSE DATE: June 5, TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE

AGENDA REPORT. Adopt Resolution No establishing updated salary schedules for the City of Red Bluff.

RE: THE IOWA LOTTERY AUTHORITY S KEY PERSONNEL

APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS FOR REVENUE ENHANCEMENT SERVICES RELATING TO SALES AND USE TAX, TELEPHONE LINE TAX, UTILITY USERS TAX AND FRANCHISE FEES.

SUBJECT: SUSTAINABLE PARK DATE: February 24, 2017 MAINTENANCE

ARTICLE 23 SALARY An employee shall be assigned to a rate within the open salary range appropriate to his/her classification.

Memorandum \[\<<\\* /7/ TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Barry Ng Jennifer A. Maguire

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

REPORT. DATE ISSUED: November 19, 2012 REPORT NO: HCR Chair and Members of the San Diego Housing Commission For the Agenda of December 7, 2012

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS BOARD ACTION SUMMARY BOARD ACTION AS FOLLOWS: RESOLUTION NO

ACTIONS RELATED TO THE RECYCLE PLUS RATES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY SERVICES

SUPPLEMENT D. This Supplement hereby sets forth certain provisions of the 1999 FirstEnergy

SUBJECT: BUSINESS TAX MODERNIZATION DATE: July 29, 2016

The purpose of this meeting will be for adoption of the Fiscal Year Millage Rate and Operating Budget.

AMENDMENT NO.2 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO.6 REGARDING THE LIBRARIAN REPRESENTATION UNIT

The City of Santa Clara received the Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury Report, Cities Must Rein In Unsustainable Employee Costs.

Meeting Date: September 28, From: Amy Cunningham, Administrative Services Director

Glossary of Terms. Anchorage Municipal Employee Association, Inc. A change to a budget that is made after the budget has been proposed.

2013 Proposed General Government Operating Budget GLOSSARY. Glossary - 1

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SUBJECT: UPDATE ON SAN JOSE CLEAN DATE: March 20, 2017 ENERGY SUPPLEMENTAL

Siemens Pension Plan

Honorable Mayor and City Council. Human Resources Department

zst FROM: Kip Harkness Kim Walesh Margaret McCahan TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: April 19,2018 Approved g (_ Date

ACTIONS RELATED TO BOARD OF FAIR CAMPAIGN AND POLITICAL PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES TO THE CITY'S GIFT ORDINANCE UNDER TITLE 12.

To approve and provide input on key start-up activities toward a targeted April 2018 launch for the first phase of San Jose Clean Energy customers.

Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Toni J. Taber, C City Clerk SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. DATE: October 13, 2016

SANJOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SAN JOSH CAPITAL OP SILICON VALLEY F/ZZ/IL. Memorandum. FROM: Kim Walesh Julia H. Cooper TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

It is recommended that the City Council approve the following actions:

UNF Board of Trustees Special Board Meeting September 10, 2013

AIRCRAFT MECHANICS FRATERNAL ASSOCATION TRANSITION AGREEMENT

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED PRESERVATION OF DOCUMENTS AND ARCHIVAL POLICY

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS Office of Institutional Research and Planning

San Antonio City Council Policy Goal Setting Session Report

Contract of Agreement between the Conejo Valley Unified School District and Chapter 620 California School Employees Association

Equity Compensation All Stars Game: Silicon Valley vs. The Rest of the World

BUDGET MEMORANDUM. Here are my top expenditure priorities for the FY Budget in ranked order, as follows:

ARTICLE 34 WAGES General Increases

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: April 3, 2017

Tom Easley Director Labor Relations

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND AFSCME DC 33 JULY 15, 2016

ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE

Astoria Public Safety Association 1.5% cost of living wage adjustment as specified in their contract expiring June 30, 2016

1. Accept staff report on the updated study of cost of service to provide potable water to San Jose Municipal Water System (SJMWS) customers; and

MEMORANDUM. Honorable Jamie Jacobs-May, Presiding Judge, Santa Clara County Superior Court

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY AND THE MORENO VALLEY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION

Appvion, Inc. Retirement Plan

PENSION REFORM: LACERS TIER II. Presented by Miguel A. Santana City Administrative Officer City of Los Angeles September 25, 2012

Approve the following amendments to the Proposed Operating Budget and the Capital Improvement Program:

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Regular Meeting

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

MasterCard Worldwide U.S. Retirement Program Changes

How does the employer mandate affect my company?

MINISTRY OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT 2017/2018 ECONOMIC STABILITY MANDATE WAGE INCREASES QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

OFFICE OF THE CITY AUDITOR

Labor Negotiations Community Meeting May 13, 2015

SEIU Local 221 Proposal to County of San Diego April 27, 2017

OFFICE OF THE CITY AUDITOR

INSPECTOR GENERAL. Employee Retirement Options. Management Advisory Report. May 2, Report Number HR-MA OFFICE OF

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

County in Economic Dire Straits: Bargaining to avoid sour grapes

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: November 22, 2016

CITY OF MIAMI INTER OFFICE MEMORANDUM. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members DATE: May 23, 2016 of the City Commission

REPORT ON RFP AND ACTIONS RELATED TO WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: May 5, 2016

Council Agenda Report

CITY CLERK MISSION STATEMENT STRUCTURE AND SERVICES

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: October 27, 2016

SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION of the RETIREMENT SECURITY PLAN as adopted by HOMEWORKS TRI-COUNTY ELECTRIC CO-OP

PART F BEAVER VALLEY BARGAINING UNIT RETIREMENT PLAN PROVISIONS

Paint Valley Local School District

SPECIAL RETIREMENT BENEFITS ANNOUNCEMENT FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES WHO PARTICIPATE IN THE RETIREMENT PLAN OF INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY

Police and Fire Meet and Confer Briefing. City Council Briefing November 6, 2013

Neelima Palacherla, Executive Officer SUBJECT: PROPOSED LAFCO BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018

RELEASE OF THE SETTLEMENT RESERVE AND OTHER ACTIONS FOR FAIRWAYS AT SAN ANTONIO COURT APARTMENTS

STAFF REPORT. Adopt Resolution Regarding Compensation and Benefits Program, Employee Salary Ranges and new Employee Classifications

PHELAN PIÑON HILLS COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

Bargaining 2018 Compensation Implementation Last Updated on 5/16/18

CenturyLink of MO Final Bargaining Report

STATUS OF LIMITED TERM STAFF POSITIONS

.a way of. Water and Power Conservation 0" April 18, 2013

CITY OF NORTH LAUDERDALE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. SUBJECT: Comprehensive Pay and Classification Plan - Fiscal Year 2015

SUPPLEMENT F SUPPLEMENT TO 1999 FIRSTENERGY CORP. PENSION PLAN RELATING TO NON-BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES PREVIOUSLY COVERED UNDER THE GPU PLAN

CITY OF BOISE INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE. Date: February 5, Mayor & City Council. Mitch Caldwell, Fire

MATERNITY, PARENTAL & ADOPTION LEAVE GUIDE for NSTU Members

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND

Transcription:

COUNCIL AGENDA: 1/26/2016 ITEM: 3 ^ SAN CITY OF fit: JOSE ^Sk CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Jennifer Schembri SUBJECT: SEE BELOW : January 20, 2016 Approved"^. / Date //2C)//fe SUPPLEMENTAL SUBJECT: INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING CITY WORKFORCE PAY S SINCE 2010-2011 REASON FOR SUPPLEMENTAL This supplemental memorandum is intended to provide information regarding the extent of City workforce pay increases since 2010-2011, per the direction of the City Council as part of Item 3.3 on the December 8, 2015 San Jose City Council Agenda. BACKGROUND At the November 18, 2015, Rules Committee meeting, the City Manager was directed to provide information regarding the status of the City's efforts to restore pay and any other compensation increases given to the entire City workforce since 2010-2011, including general wage increases, step increases, and management pay for performance increases, prior to making any decisions to restore Council pay. This memo contains background information regarding the history of citywide compensation reductions beginning in 2010 and information regarding employee salary increases. In November 2010, the City Council in open session approved a Fiscal Year 2011-2012 goal of reducing the total ongoing employee compensation for all City employees by ten percent (10%) and rolling back any general wage increases received in Fiscal Year 2010-2011. This ten percent (10%) reduction in personnel costs was realized on June 26, 2011 for ten (10) of the City's eleven (11) bargaining units, as well as Executive Management (Unit 99) staff, and on September 18, 2011 for the remaining bargaining unit. In addition, on June 7, 2011, the City Council in open session approved the recommendation of the Council Salary Setting

January 20, 2016 Page 2 of 5 Commission Report, dated April 26, 2011, which, in part, was to reduce the salaries of the Mayor and each Councilmember by approximately ten percent (10%). The Salary Setting Commission's Report, dated April 22, 2015, recommends to the City Council a 9.6% salary increase for the Mayor, and 13.6% salary increase for the Council. The City Council has not received a salary increase since approving the Salary Setting Commission's 2011 recommendation to approve the ten percent (10%) decrease for Councilmembers. ANALYSIS Average City Workforce Pay Increases Following the pay reductions for City staff, which were folly realized by September 18, 2011, there have been various pay increases for employees represented by the City's eleven (11) bargaining units, as well as employees in Unit 99. These pay increases have come from negotiated general wage increases, salary step advancements, and performance based compensation increases as a result of the Management Performance Program (MPP). For the purpose of tracking City workforce pay increases since 2010-2011, all data related to employees receiving step and/or performance based compensation increases has been limited to employees who have been employed by the City from September 18, 2011 through December 15, 2015. In some cases, employees may have transferred between bargaining units during this time. In circumstances such as these, any step or performance based compensation increases as a result of the MPP have been counted toward the bargaining unit that represented the employee at the time they received the step or MPP increase. It is also important to note that data contained in this memorandum does not include salary increases due to employee promotions, or adjustments made to the City's Pay Plan in response to recruitment and retention issues, such as modifications to the Electrician class series, Building Inspector class series, and the Planner class series, among others. General Wage Increases (GWI) Following the ten percent (10%) reduction in personnel costs, the MOAs reached with the City's bargaining units, as well as the Compensation Summary for employees within Unit 99, have contained the following GWI:

January 20,2016 Page 3 of 5 Employee Unit Ongoing GWI FYE 2011- FYE 2016 Effective June 19, 2016 Effective First Pay Period FY 2017-2018 OE#3 8.00% 3.00% 3.00% IAFF 8.00% 3.00% 3.00% ABMEI 8.00% 3.00% 3.00% IBEW 8.00% 3.00% j AMSP 8.00% 3.00% 3.00% AEA 8.00% 3.00% 3.00% CAMP 8.00% 3.00% 3.00% POA 10.66% 4.00% 2.3 MEF 8.00% 3.00% 3.00% CEO 8.00% 3.00%.4 Unit 99 8.00% 3.00% 3.00% ALP 8.00% 3.00% _5 Average 8.22% 3.08% 3.00% A comprehensive listing of all GWI from Fiscal Year 2010-2011 through all current MO As can be found in Attachment A. Step Increases Employees in classifications represented by the POA, IAFF, ABMEI, MEF, OE#3, IBEW, and CEO are non-management employees. Per their MOAs and City Policy Manual, Section 3.3.3, Non-Management Performance Program, classifications represented by these bargaining units have specific salary steps within their pay ranges that employees advance through based on the amount of time they have spent in their current classification and step. With the exception of transitioning from Step 1 to Step 2 for some bargaining units, an automatic step increase is granted to employees upon completion of one full year (2,080 hours worked) in each step. Prior to June 26, 2011, there had been a difference of approximately five percent (5%) between steps within a single classification. Effective June 26, 2011 for ABMEI, MEF, OE#3, IBEW, and effective September 18, 2011 for CEO, for classifications in these bargaining units the difference in pay between each salary step changed from approximately five percent (5%) to approximately two and one half percent (2.5%), which resulted in an increase in the number of 1 The IBEW MOA expires on June 30, 2017. 2 This figure does not include a 4.00% ongoing, non-pensionable retention bonus premium pay that was agreed to as part of the January 1, 2016 December 31, 2016 MOA between the City and the POA. 3 The POA MOA expires on December 31, 2016. 4 The CEO MOA expires on June 30, 2017. 5 The ALP MOA expires on June 30, 2017.

January 20, 2016 Page 4 of 5 steps in the pay ranges for these classifications. POA and IAFF continue to have a five percent (5%) difference between steps. Bargaining Unit Number of Employees Step in 2011 Step in 2015 Average Total Increase from Step Increases Per Employee 2011-2015 POA 762 81.70% 94.45% 4.72% IAFF 549 67.88% 88.40% 6.91% ABMEI 41 94.87% 87.50% 3.90% MEF 1,860 47.97% 46.80% 3.45% OE#3 525 65.23% 65.70% 3.71% IBEW 47 89.36% 81.40% 2.23% CEO 178 82.54% 65.79% 2.56% Please note that this data represents the average total salary increase per applicable employee due to step increases over a time period of over approximately four years, from September 18, 2011 through December 15, 2015. Please also note that this data includes employees who were at the top step of their classification on September 18, 2011 and who still occupied that same classification and step on December 15, 2015. As such, while these employees were part of the City workforce data set, they did not receive any additional salary increase(s) from one or more step increases, but were included when calculating the average increases from step increases per employee since 2010-2011. Management Performance Program (MPP) Increases Employees in classifications represented by AEA, AMSP, CAMP, and ALP, as well as employees in Unit 99 are management employees. Per their MOAs, Compensation Summaries, and City Policy Manual, Section 3.3.2, Management Performance Program, classifications represented by these bargaining units, or contained within Unit 99, have open ranges in between their minimum and maximum salaries, instead of designated steps. Additionally, there are no automatic increases in pay as a result of the length of time an employee has spent within their classification. Instead, advancement in an MPP classification is achieved solely based on the employee's rating on their annual performance appraisal. During the fall of each year, the City Manager provides guidelines for salary increases based on performance ratings. Following the ten percent (10%) total compensation reduction, the MPP program was frozen until the beginning of FY 12-13. Once it resumed, the guidelines provided for up to a two and one half percent (2.5%) merit increase based on performance. Per these guidelines, employees at the top of their salary range are eligible for up to a two and one half percent (2.5%) one-time lump sum bonus based on their performance. The data below reflects the ongoing merit increases received.

January 20, 2016 Page 5 of 5 Bargaining Unit And Executive Management Number of Employees of Salary Range in 2011 of Salary Range in 2015 Average Total Increase from Ongoing MPP Increases Per Employee 2011-2015 AEA 137 34.35% 39.68% 5.45% AMSP 15.00% 35.71% 4.54% CAMP 288 41.45% 45.24% 3.94% ALP 18.18% 16.67% 5.36% Unit #99 209 14.89% 31.28% 5.52% Please note that this data represents the average total salary increase per applicable employee due to performance based compensation increases as a result of the MPP over a time period of over approximately four years, from September 18, 2011 through December 15, 2015. Please also note that this data includes employees who were at the top of the pay scale for their classification on September 18, 2011 and who still occupied that classification and remained at the top of the pay scale for their classification on December 15, 2015. As such, while these employees were part of the City workforce data set, they did not receive any additional salary increase(s) from performance based compensation increases as a result of the MPP, but were included when calculating the average increases from ongoing MPP increases per employee since 2010-2011. As each bargaining unit may have different amounts for salary step increases and MPP increases, it is difficult to provide an overall average of all City workforce pay increases received since 2010-2011 per Council direction. A conservative method of accounting for City workforce pay increases from 2010-2011 through December 15, 2015 would be to assume at least an eight percent (8%) increase as a result of GWIs, and either (1) a 2.23% pay increase due to salary step increases, or (2) a 3.94% pay increase due to performance based compensation increases as a result of the MPP. % JENNIFER SCHEMBRI Director of Employee Relations Attachment: List of all GWI from 2010-2011 through all current MO As For questions please contact Jennifer Schembri, Director of Employee Relations, at (408) 535 8150.

Attachment A List of All General Wage Increases 2010-2011 Through Current MOAs 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 EMPLOYEE UNIT OE#3 0.00% N/A 2.00% 4/27/2014 1 3.00% 6/22/2014 3.00% 6/21/2015 3.00% 6/19/2016 3.00% First PP 2017 IAFF 0.00% N/A 0.00% N/A 5.00% 6/22/2014 3.00% 6/21/2015 3.00% 6/19/2016 3.00% First PP 2017 ABMEI 0.00% N/A 2.00% 11/24/2013 3.00% 6/22/2014 3.00% 6/21/2015 3.00% 6/19/2016 3.00% First PP 2017 IBEW 0.00% N/A 2.00% 10/27/2013 3.00% 6/22/2014 3.00% 6/21/2015 3.00% 6/19/2016 TBD TBD AMSP 0.00% N/A 2.00% 6/23/2013 3.00% 6/22/2014 3.00% 6/21/2015 3.00% 6/19/2016 3.00% First PP 2017 AEA 0.00% N/A 2.00% 10/13/2013 3.00% 6/22/2014 3.00% 6/21/2015 3.00% 6/19/2016 3.00% First PP 2017 CAMP 0.00% N/A 2.00% 6/23/2013 3.00% 6/22/2014 3.00% 6/21/2015 3.00% 6/19/2016 3.00% First PP 2017 POA 0.00% N/A 4.00% 12/22/2013 3.33% 6/22/2014 3.33% 6/21/2015 4.00% 6/19/2016 TBD TBD MEF 0.00% N/A 2.00% 6/23/2013 3.00% 6/22/2014 3.00% 6/21/2015 3.00% 6/19/2016 3.00% First PP 2017 CEO 0.00% N/A 2.00% 6/23/2013 3.00% 6/22/2014 3.00% 6/21/2015 3.00% 6/19/2016 TBD TBD UNIT 99 0.00% N/A 2.00% 6/23/2013 3.00% 6/22/2014 3.00% 6/21/2015 3.00% 6/19/2016 3.00% First PP 2017 ALP 2 0.00% N/A 2.00% 6/23/2013 3.00% 6/22/2014 3.00% 6/21/2015 3.00% 6/19/2016 TBD TBD Average 0.00% 2.00% 3.19% 3.03% 3.08% 3.00% EMPLOYEE UNIT TOTAL ONGOING 2011-2015 TOTAL ONGOING 2011-2017 3 OE#3 8.00% 14.00% IAFF 8.00% 14.00% ABMEI 8.00% 14.00% IBEW 8.00% 11.00% AMSP 8.00% 14.00% AEA 8.00% 14.00% CAMP 8.00% 14.00% POA 10.66% 14.66% MEF 8.00% 14.00% CEO 8.00% 11.00% UNIT 99 8.00% 14.00% ALP 2 8.00% 11.00% Average 8.22% 13.31% Additional Notes: 1 This wage increase was negotiated as part of FY 13/14 negotiations. 2 Prior to 2010 employees represented by ALP were in Unit 99. 3 POA contract expires on December 31, 2016. IBEW, CEO, and ALP contracts expire on June 30, 2017. January 13, 2016 City of San Jose