China s 2009 Regulation on the Prevention and

Similar documents
Legal Briefing. Chinese marine pollution laws JULY 2010 MARINE POLLUTION

PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT

Chinese Law on Protection of the Marine Environment Caused by Ship Oil Pollution - Lessons Learned for Vietnam

POLLUTION LIABILITIES

Marine Protection Rules Part 143 Shipboard Marine Pollution Emergency Plans for Noxious Liquid Substances

Transport Canada Update. CBMU Fall Conference 2018

NORTH RESIDENTIAL TRAINING COURSE 2018 POLLUTION. Catherine Doyle, Michelle Foster and Eamon Moloney

HNS TANKER OWNER S DUTY IN JAPAN S INCE APRIL 1 ST, Maritime Disaster Prevention

UNMANNED VESSELS LEGAL ASPECTS TO

TO ALL MEMBERS AND BROKERS. 29 July Dear Sirs

GUIDE ON PRACTICAL METHODS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OPRC CONVENTION AND THE OPRC-HNS PROTOCOL

PROPOSAL FOR A DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL ON CIVIL LIABILITY AND FINANCIAL GUARANTEES OF SHIPOWNERS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Part Objective. The rules are made pursuant to sections 386, 387 and 388 of the Maritime Transport Act 1994.

Enforcement of international maritime legal instruments

Translation: Only the Danish document has legal validity Excerpts of Act no. 618 of 12 June 2013 issued by the Ministry of Business and Growth

Fowler, Rodriguez, Kingsmill, Flint, Gray, & Chalos, L.L.P. The International Convention on Civil Liability For Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001

Submission of the Maritime Law Association of Australia and New Zealand (MLAANZ) on the Maritime Transport Amendment Bill 2016 (200-1) 1 February 2017

Conditions of Use for LNG CARRIERS

THE HNS PROTOCOL. by Dr. Rosalie P. Balkin Director Legal Affairs and External Relations Division International Maritime Organization

Recent Developments of Maritime Law in China. James Hu Shanghai Maritime University Shanghai Wintell & Co Law Firm

IACS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES LTD.

MARINE SALVAGE: REINFORCING POLLUTION DEFENCE IN EU WATERS

CROATIAN PARLIAMENT DECISION PROMULGATING THE ACT ON AMENDMENTS TO THE MARITIME CODE

Maritime Transport Amendment Bill

Main reasons for the changes introduced into the 1996 Convention by the 2010 Protocol

NATIONAL INTEREST ANALYSIS

PORT QASIM AUTHORITY. Condition of Use for LNG CARRIERS

An act to add and repeal Division 36 (commencing with Section 71200) of the Public Resources Code, relating to ballast water.

REGULATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL SAFETY MANAGEMENT CODE FOR TURKISH FLAGGED VESSELS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT COMPANIES PART ONE

DHT HOLDINGS, INC. Common Stock

The Role of the International Maritime Organization (1MO)

REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS

OUTLINE FOR PRESENTATION

Prevention and Response to Pollution Contract

AN OVERVIEW OF THE HNS CONVENTION

THE HNS CONVENTION WHY IT IS NEEDED

LIABILITY AND COMPENSATION FOR SHIP-SOURCE OIL POLLUTION: AN OVERVIEW OF THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR OIL POLLUTION DAMAGE FROM TANKERS

Marine Protection Rules Part 103: Notifications Oil and Noxious Liquid Substances

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON CIVIL LIABILITY FOR BUNKER OIL POLLUTION DAMAGE, 2001

Arctic shipping and liability for harm to natural resources

Implementation of Article 19 of the Convention: Liability

Translation. Only the Danish document has legal validity. Order no. 196 of 28 February 2017 issued by the Danish Maritime Authority

Maritime Rules Part 21: Safe Ship Management Systems

INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION S REGIONAL SENIOR MARITIME ADMINISTRATORS WORKSHOP. Montego Bay, Jamaica February 2013

INDEX. xxi INDEX : (2017) 23 JIML

REMEDYING ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE FROM WRECKS THE LIABILITY OF OWNERS AND SALVORS. Prof. emeritus Peter Wetterstein

Notice to Mariners No. 71

Commonwealth of Dominica. Office of the Maritime Administrator. The amendments to the fee schedule include, but are not limited to:

THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA LIBERIA MARITIME AUTHORITY

IMO MANUALS AND GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS. Note by the Secretariat

THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA LIBERIA MARITIME AUTHORITY

Terms and Conditions for Bulk Shipments by Barge or Vessel

ANNEX GUIDELINES ON FAIR TREATMENT OF SEAFARERS IN THE EVENT OF A MARITIME ACCIDENT

2. Definitions 2.1 For the purpose of these Instructions, unless expressly provided otherwise:

Objective. Extent of consultation. Entry into force

THE BUNKERS CONVENTION 2001: CHALLENGES FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION

Annex II - Schedule of Canada. Aboriginal Affairs

BUNKERING LICENCE. Name of Licensed Operator:. Registered physical address from where principal business is carried on: ...

SPANISH EXPERIENCE ON CLAIMS MANAGEMENT. Mónica Mulero NOVEMBER 2011

REPORT On the public consultation on new initiative regarding dismantling of ships

HNS Response Resource Deployment and Emergency Response Service

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL. Maritime Pollution Liability and Policy. China, Europe and the US. Edited By. Michael G. Faure, Han Lixin & Shan Hongjun

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 SESSION LAW SENATE BILL 836

Buenos Aires Colloquium Comité Maritime International. Asociación Argentina de Derecho Marítimo. by Diego Esteban Chami

FLAG STATE PERFORMANCE SELF-ASSESSMENT FORM. (Five Year Period: )

Appendix FLAG STATE PERFORMANCE SELF-ASSESSMENT FORM. (Five Year Period: )

Objective. Part 120. Part 121A

ANNEX II. Reservations for Future Measures. Schedule of Canada Explanatory Notes

The Republic of Palau Palau International Ship Registry

ENSURING SHIPBREAKING COMPLIES WITH THE BASEL CONVENTION 3 May 2013

NEW ZEALAND OIL POLLUTION LEVY

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS

The Regime for Liability and Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage from Ships

Canada s Ship-Source Oil Spill Preparedness and Response

COMMENTS ON BILL C-64 (AN ACT RESPECTING WRECKS, ABANDONED, DILAPIDATED OR HAZARDOUS VESSELS AND SALVAGE OPERATIONS

The Legal Regime of Offshore Oil Rigs in International Law

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Environmental Damage Compensation in China following Ship- Sourced Oil Spills

Emerging Challenges and Recent Developments Affecting Transport and Trade Facilitation

International Group of P&I Clubs. HNS - Rome workshop

MARITIME LAW REFORM Discussion Paper

The Accident Investigations Ordinance (1990:717)

REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA BUREAU OF MARITIME AFFAIRS

International treaty examination of the Protocol of 1996 to Amend the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976

The Nairobi International Convention on the Removal of Wrecks. Dr. Matthew Attard GANADO ADVOCATES

INCIDENTS INVOLVING THE IOPC FUNDS 1992 FUND

PREVENTION AND COMPENSATION OF MARINE POLLUTION DAMAGE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN EUROPE, CHINA AND THE US MICHAEL G. FA URE AND JAMES HU (EDS.

SMALL TANKER OIL POLLUTION INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT (STOPIA)

2013. Marine Pollution (Liability and Cost Recovery) Act Certified on: 3 g

Council. International Seabed Authority ISBA/16/C/6

Consultation Document New Zealand s accession to the Supplementary Fund Protocol

MERCHANT SHIPPING (HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK) REGULATIONS 2003 BR 52/ 2004 MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT : 35

IMO WORK PROGRAMME. Damage stability verification of oil, chemical and gas tankers

Proposed Canadian Legislative Regime. For the Remediation of Hazards Related to Shipwrecks. Discussion Paper

ANNEX II. Schedule of Canada. Reservations for Future Measures

Accessing Europe s Largest Registry. Dr. Jean-Pie Gauci-Maistre

The Nairobi Convention on the Removal of Wrecks, Turkey s Position and the Role of Insurers

ALL SHIPOWNERS, OPERATORS, MASTERS AND OFFICERS OF MERCHANT SHIPS AND AUTHORIZED CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES.

Pollution Incident Reduction MANAGEMENT PLAN. Environment Protection Licence No Berth 104 Bulk Shipping (non-graincorp cargo) PUBLIC VERSION

Transcription:

China s 2009 Regulation on the Prevention and Control of Marine Pollution from Ships Nengye Liu * Introduction The People s Republic of China is a major coastal state with an eastern continental coastline of some 18 000 km, complemented by a further 14 000 km of coastline around its 6 500 islands. 1 Obviously, the marine environment is of fundamental importance for both the economic development and the environmental protection of China. According to the National Report on Social and Economic Development, China imported 178 880 000 tons of crude oil and 38 850 000 tons of refined oil in 2008. 2 Of this, some 95% is carried by maritime transportation. China is therefore at great risk of marine pollution from ships. The initial stage of China s economic reform and openness witnessed the promulgation of 1982 Marine Environmental Protection Law (MEPL 82) as well as the 1983 Regulation on Prevention of Pollution from Ships at Sea (Regulation 83). China * PhD Candidate, Department of Public International Law, Faculty of Law, Ghent University, Belgium (email: nengye.liu@ugent.be). 1 E. Franckx (ed), Vessel-Source Pollution and Coastal State Jurisdiction: The Work of the ILA Committee on Coastal State Jurisdiction Relating to Marine Pollution (1991-2000) (Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2001) 201. 2 2008 Gazette of National Social and Economic Development of People s Republic of China (available at http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/ndtjgb/qgndtjgb/t20090226_402540710.htm). 1

has subsequently ratified the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC) as well as many International Maritime Organization (IMO) treaties dealing with vessel-source pollution. These include: the Protocol of 1992 of the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (CLC); the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto (MARPOL73/78); the International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Co-operation, 1990 (OPRC90); the and International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001 (the Bunker Convention). Recent domestic legal reform relating to marine pollution from ships was triggered by the amendment of MEPL82 in December 1999 (MEPL99). It has however taken China ten years to enact its new regime. On 2 September 2009, the State Council of the P. R. China adopted the Regulation on Administration of Prevention and Control of Pollution of Marine Environment from Vessels (Regulation 09), which will replace the Regulation 83 and is scheduled to enter into force on 1 March 2010. This report analyses Regulation 09 in comparison with Regulation 83 and relevant international conventions. What is New in the Regulation 09? Regulation 09 contains 9 chapters with 78 clauses, dealing with: (1) general principles; (2) general provisions for the prevention and control of marine pollution from vessels and relevant operating activities; (3) vessel discharges and reception facilities; (4) prevention and control of marine pollution from relevant operating activities; (5) emergency response to vessel-source pollution incidents; (6) investigation of vessel-source pollution incidents; (7) compensation for damages caused by vessel-source pollution incidents; (8) legal liability; and (10) miscellaneous provisions. Compared to Regulation 83, Regulation 09 regulates prevention and control, and not only prevention. This not only follows the LOSC and MEPL99, but also reflects 2

the guiding ideology of China s marine environment protection: prevention, control and compensation. 3 The first chapter of Regulation 09 sets out principles and the scope of application. While Regulation 83 is applied to all ships, ship owners and other people within China s jurisdiction or any Chinese port (article 2), Regulation 09 aims to prevent and control marine pollution from vessels and relevant operating activities within China s jurisdiction (article 2). Regulation 09 declares that stressing prevention while combining prevention with abatement is the guiding principle for the prevention and control of marine pollution from vessels and relevant operating activities (article 3). The Maritime Safety Agency (MSA) is authorized as the competent authority, which replaces the Harbor Superintendency Administration established under Regulation 83. 4 The MSA should also cooperate with State Oceanic Administration for a better supervision of vessels and relevant operating activities (article 7). Moreover, Regulation 09 requires the MSA and local governments to develop contingency capacity-building planning, contingency response systems, contingency plans as well as professional teams and equipment (article 5 and article 8). It is the first time that emergency response to vessel-source pollution clearly becomes a legal responsibility of the Government, which is in accordance with the 2007 Emergency Response Law of P. R. China. In addition, article 9 stipulates that any entity and individual should report to the nearest competent authority. Chapter 2 is titled General Provisions. In order to implement MARPOL, 5 it provides that construction, equipment and apparatus of vessels should fit the requirements to prevent and control vessel-source pollution in national legislation and international conventions that China has ratified. Vessels (not limited to oil tankers of 150 tons and above and other ships of more than 400 tons as in Regulation 83) should carry anti- with domestic legislation as well as pollution certificates in accordance international 3 H. Wang, Legal Cornerstone for the Prevention of Marine Pollution From Vessels, an Interview to the Deputy Director of the Department of Industry, Information, Transport and Commerce, Legislative Affairs Office of the State Council, P. R. China (2009) 10 China Maritime Safety. 4 Former Harbor Superintendency Administration and Ship Supperintendency Administration of Ministry of Transport were merged into the Maritime Safety Agency, which is also affiliated with the Ministry of Transport. 5 China ratified MARPOL73/78 Annex I, II in 1983, Annex III in 1994, Annex IV in 2006, Annex V in 1988 and Annex VI in 2006. 3

conventions which China has ratified (article 10). Regulation 09 uses a reference article instead of detailed requirements as was the case in chapter 3 (anti-pollution certificate) of Regulation 83, which can be helpful for Regulation 09 to catch up with the fast development of international marine conventions. Moreover, as a contracting party to the LOSC, China also needs to enforce flag state control for preventing vessel-source pollution. This resulted in the inclusion of a new article 11, which requires all ship owners, operators and managers of Chinese vessels to establish a safe operation system for preventing vessel-source pollution. Furthermore, articles 12, 13 and 14 provide details to implement article 69 of MEPL99 (all ports, harbors, loading stations and shipyards are required to be equipped with anti-pollution facilities). Chapter 3 deals with vessel discharges and reception. Once again, a reference article is used: vessels should obey domestic legislations, international conventions as well as relevant standards to prevent atmospheric pollution and to prevent and control discharges of garbage, sewage, oil-containing waste water, hazardous and noxious waste and ballast water into sea areas within China s jurisdiction. Otherwise, pollutants that are not allowed to be discharged should be delivered to reception facilities (article 15). However, the 1983 National Vessel Pollutant Discharge Standard also needs to be updated to enable the enforcement of the Regulation 09 in the near future. Another important provision is article 19, which compels qualified reception companies to report monthly to the MSA about the reception and disposal of vessel pollutants. Since 1986, the Chinese Government submits every year Mandatory Reports on Implementation MARPOL73/78. However, the third part of the report about reception facilities is always empty. 6 It is foreseeable that this problem may be solved if article 19 can be enforced properly in the future. Chapter 4 focuses on marine pollution from relevant operating activities, which is supplemented by chapter 5 (hazardous cargo carried by ships), chapter 8 (use of vessels for dumping) and chapter 9 (Vessels Building, Repair, Salvage and Dismantling on and under Water) of Regulation 83. However, chapter 4 substantially revised and expanded Regulation 83. Articles 21-25 deal with hazardous cargo carried by ships. Ship owners, cargo owners or their brokers (the list of hazardous 6 H. Lao, Good Work Requires Good Tools: How are We Going to Deal with the Entry into Force of MARPOL73/78 and its Annexes (2008) 8 China Maritime Safety 4. 4

cargo will be announced by the MSA) should submit applications to the MSA. Vessels can only enter into port after the approval of the MSA. In the event that it is not clear whether the cargo is hazardous or not, an authorized institution must first carry out an assessment. Moreover, the MSA has the power to check the cargo for shipment whenever it believes it is necessary. Article 26 makes it clear how to apply for the approval from the MSA (regulated in terms of article 70 of MEPL99) for vessels undertaking ship-to-ship transfer of noxious liquid substances. Bunkering (article 27 and article 28), ship building and dismantling (article 29 and article 30) and dumping (article 32) are also regulated. In accordance with article 39 of MEPL99, vessels are prohibited to carry hazardous waste within internal waters and territorial sea. In other sea areas under China s jurisdiction, vessels should sail with paper approval from the Ministry of Environmental Protection, in the sea lane designated by the MSA and regularly report its position to the MSA (article 31). The operators of vessels carrying noxious liquid substances and other vessels above 10,000 gross tonnages, must sign a cleanup agreement with a qualified company before operation or entry into port. Chapters 5 and 6 are two new chapters focusing on vessel-source pollution accidents. Article 36 of chapter 5 clearly sets out four different levels of vessel-source pollution accidents. It is divided into four levels based on the amount of oil spilled or direct economic losses, namely: most serious accidents (above 1000 tons or 200 million RMB loss); very serious accidents (500-1000 tons or 100 200 million RMB); serious accidents (100-500 tons or 50-100 million RMB); and accidents (less than 100 tons or 50 million RMB). This is important since it clarifies which department in the Government is responsible to deal with an accident (article 39) and which one is responsible to carry out the investigation after an accident (article 44). The responsible department also needs to follow a series of rules in order to do the investigation (articles 45-48), prepare an accident report and subsequently send it to relevant parties within 20 days (article 49). Chapter 7 deals with compensation for pollution damage caused by vessels. It makes Regulation 09 a mixed regulation, including both preventive measures and civil liability articles. Moreover, liability can definitely become an important incentive for parties to be more careful with their responsibility concerning preventing vessel- 5

source pollution. 7 Mandatory insurance for oil pollution is established (article 53). All vessels that navigate in the sea areas under China s jurisdiction should have appropriate insurance policies or financial guarantee, except vessels below 1,000 gross tonnage that don t carry oil. The national oil pollution compensation fund is finally established by Regulation 09 (article 56), which is remarked as the most important and impressive article in the Regulation09. 8 Article 56 clarifies who is liable to pay for the compensation fund (oil receivers or their brokers), how to collect, use and manage the fund (rules on the collection and use of oil pollution compensation fund has already been drafted and is now waiting for being issued) and who will deal with compensation claims (the National Fund Management Committee which consists of relevant government departments and cargo owners who pay the money). Since China is of the opinion that if it accepts the 1992 Fund Convention nationally, it would be too heavy a burden for domestic oil receivers, 9 China decided to establish its own national compensation fund. According to the draft rules, oil receivers will pay 0.3 RMB/ton for the oil import. Otherwise, its oil import will be prohibited to enter into the port or loading and unloading station. 10 The financial cap for each claim may be 50 million RMB. What is unclear is how parties suffering from oil pollution claim compensation from the fund. Chapter 8 concentrates on administrative measures on vessel-source pollution. The Regulation 09 not only imposes administrative measures to ship owners and operators, but also to companies of relevant operating activities such as reception facilities, bunker providers and cargo owners. Unlike regulation 83 which only sets out warning and fixed fines, it sets different kinds of fines as well as other measures (stop working, mandatory unloading, prohibited of entering into the port, etc). The last chapter follows Art. 97 of MEPL99, which governs relations between domestic law and international law. Accordingly, except clauses that are reserved by the Chinese Government when it ratified the Convention, international conventions 7 G. Gauci, Protection of the Marine Environment through the International Ship-Source Oil Pollution Compensation Regimes (1999) 8 RECIEL 30. 8 J. Geng, Draft Regulations on Administration of Prevention and Control of Pollution of Marine Environment from Vessels, a Legal Framework of Prevention, Control and Compensation for Vessel-Source Pollution is Emerging (2008) 5 Maritime Review 11. 9 H. Wang, Oil Pollution Compensation Fund is Coming: China will Establish Oil Pollution Compensation Fund which is suitable with its Realities (2005)1 China Maritime Safety 11. 10 See http://finance.ifeng.com/huanbao/fgbz/20090916/1243830.shtml. 6

on prevention of vessel-source pollution prevail over domestic legislations and will be directly applied (article 75). Article 76 authorizes fishing agencies to be in charge of preventing vessel-source pollution from fishing vessels outside fishing ports and nonmilitary vessels in fishing ports. The environment protection agency of the military is the competent authority to supervise, manage and investigate vessel-source pollution from military vessels. Conclusion Compared to Regulation 83, great improvements can be found in Regulation 09 to implement the MEPL99 as well as international conventions that China has ratified (LOSC, MARPOL, SOLAS, OPRC and etc). It is far more detailed and clearer than its predecessor. However, a set of complementary rules such as oil discharge standards and guidance for claiming compensation from the national oil pollution compensation fund are still required to ensure the adequate prevention of vessel-source pollution in China. 7