Entry into force of amendments to capital markets transparency legislation

Similar documents
EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 10 October 2013 (OR. en) 2011/0307 (COD) PE-CONS 37/13 EF 115 ECOFIN 439 DRS 107 CODEC 1296

Luxembourg implements Directive 2013/50/EU on transparency requirements

European Regulatory Snapshot: The Amended Transparency Directive

Questions and answers

AIF. Alternative Investment Funds

Delegations will find attached a Presidency compromise on the above Commission proposal, following the meeting of 13 November.

14 NOVEMBER Royal Decree on the obligations of issuers of financial instruments admitted to trading on a regulated market

3: Equivalent markets

Transparency Directive debt and ABS issuers

Listing of Shares on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange

Debt Instruments Issuance Programme

(Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Consultation Paper. ESMA Guidelines on enforcement of financial information. 19 July 2013 ESMA/2013/1013

1. HALF-YEARLY FINANCIAL REPORTS

ING BELGIUM INTERNATIONAL FINANCE S.A.

An AIF shall be managed by a single AIFM responsible for ensuring compliance with the AIFM Law which shall either be:

Warrants Issuance Programme

Debt Instruments Issuance Programme

UNIBAIL-RODAMCO SE RODAMCO EUROPE FINANCE B.V. RODAMCO SVERIGE AB. EURO 15,000,000,000 Guaranteed Euro Medium Term Note Programme UNIBAIL-RODAMCO SE

Arranger Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch

AND BNP PARIBAS FORTIS FUNDING (INCORPORATED AS A SOCIÉTÉ ANONYME UNDER THE LAWS OF THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG

Questions and answers

Düsseldorfer Hypothekenbank Aktiengesellschaft

SECOND SUPPLEMENT DATED 8 DECEMBER 2017 TO THE BASE PROSPECTUS DATED 15 SEPTEMBER 2017

Questions and Answers On the common operation of the Market Abuse Directive

Opinion. 17 June 2016 ESMA/2016/982

The National Assembly has adopted: CAPITAL MARKET ACT. Definitions 1 (1) For the purposes of this Federal Act the following definitions shall apply:

Questions and answers

Finansinspektionen s Regulatory Code

Listing of Debt Securities on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange

Arranger Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

Arranger Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch

CAPITAL MARKETS. Listing of bonds on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange

Regulations and guidelines 6/2016

THE CROATIAN PARLIAMENT

UCITS. Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities

MARKET ABUSE REGULATION

TRANSPARENCY OBLIGATIONS DIRECTIVE (DISCLOSURE AND TRANSPARENCY RULES) INSTRUMENT 2006

Questions and Answers. On the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR)

Technical advice on Minimum Information Content for Prospectus Exemption

INTRODUCTION - The context and status of this Q and A :

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Audit Reform in Luxembourg what role will the Audit Committee play?

COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN SECURITIES REGULATORS

L 145/30 Official Journal of the European Union

AND BNP PARIBAS FORTIS FUNDING (INCORPORATED AS A SOCIÉTÉ ANONYME UNDER THE LAWS OF THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG

This Supplement will be published on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange's website

The present English text is for information purposes only and is not legally binding. The legally binding document is in the Greek language.

3.3 Manipulation of the Rexel Security s Market Price Blackout Periods relative to the Publication of Financial Statements...

PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT

Review of the ECB Regulation on supervisory fees

SUPPLEMENT DATED 30 DECEMBER 2016 TO THE BASE PROSPECTUS DATED 20 JULY 2016 SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE. as Issuer and Guarantor (incorporated in France) and

Questions and Answers Prospectuses 27th updated version October 2017

(Incorporated as a joint stock company in the Republic of Austria under registered number FN m)

A new European framework: MAR and CSMAD

Implementation of the PD Amending Directive in Luxembourg.

Insider Dealing Regulations. Short description. Scope

Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules sourcebook

Questions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR)

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on Short Selling and certain aspects of Credit Default Swaps

Euro 45,000,000,000 Medium Term Notes and other Debt Instruments Programme

Questions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR)

OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN SECURITIES AND MARKETS AUTHORITY (ESMA) Of 27 September 2017

FOURTH SUPPLEMENT TO THE BASE PROSPECTUS DATED 24 SEPTEMBER 2009

Credit Suisse AG Credit Suisse International

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

THIRD SUPPLEMENT DATED 16 NOVEMBER 2017 TO THE BASE PROSPECTUS DATED 22 JUNE 2017

New European Regulation on the prospectus when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading

Response to the Consultation Paper ESMA Guidelines on enforcement of financial information

ALL CASH FINAL OFFER for COLT GROUP S.A. by Lightning Investors Limited an entity jointly owned by FMR LLC and FIL LIMITED

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 47(2) thereof,

TEXTS ADOPTED. Long-term shareholder engagement and corporate governance statement ***I

Companies Act 2006 Implementing the Transparency Directive. slaughter and may. January 2007

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

EMIS GROUP PLC SHARE DEALING CODE

Frequently asked questions regarding Prospectuses: Common positions agreed by CESR Members 11 th Updated Version - July 2010

Joint Consultation Paper

COMMISSION FOR THE SUPERVISION

Number 26 of Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) (Amendment) Act 2018

DIRECTIVE 2013/34/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Questions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR)

Questions and Answers

12618/17 OM/vc 1 DGG 1B

Guidelines On the Process for the Calculation of the Indicators to Determine the Substantial Importance of a CSD for a Host Member State

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

GUIDELINES FOR INSIDERS OF LISTED COMPANIES

FACT SHEET EU rules for disclosure of payments to governments by oil, gas and mining (extractive industry) and logging companies

European Savings Banks Group (ESBG)

Market Abuse Regulation. NEVIR & AFM Webinar 13 October 2016

May 25, EU Prospectus Rules. Introduction

Questions and Answers Risk Measurement and Calculation of Global Exposure and Counterparty Risk for UCITS

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION. on the Statute for a European private company

LEGAL ALERT 30 OCTOBER 2012

Questions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR)

FIRST SUPPLEMENT DATED 1 MARCH 2016 TO THE BASE PROSPECTUS DATED 29 DECEMBER 2015

CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS HOLDINGS INC. (a corporation duly incorporated and existing under the laws of the State of New York) and

SWEDEN. Mutual Evaluation Fourth Follow-Up Report - annexes. Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism

FBF S RESPONSE. The FBF welcomes the opportunity to comment EC consultation on a revision of the Market Abuse directive.

Questions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR)

Transcription:

Entry into force of amendments to capital markets transparency legislation The Luxembourg law of 10 May 2016 (the Amending Law ) implementing amendments to the Luxembourg transparency law for issuers of securities has entered into force on 15 May 2016. The Amending Law implements Directive 2013/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 1 (the Amending Directive ) and Article 1 of Directive 2014/51/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 2 and amends the Luxembourg law of 11 January 2008 on transparency requirements of issuers (the Transparency Law ) and, on one point only, the Luxembourg law of 10 July 2005 on prospectuses for securities. The Grand Ducal Regulation dated 11 January 2008 on transparency requirements of issuers of securities is also amended by a new Grand Ducal Regulation dated 10 May 2016. On 22 June 2016, the Commission de surveillance du secteur financier ( CSSF ) published Circular 16/637 amending CSSF Circular 08/337 on the entry into force of the law of 11 January 2008 and of the Grand-Ducal Regulation of 11 January 2008 on transparency requirements for issuers of securities offering general guidance on the amended Transparency Law, and Circular 16/638 amending CSSF Circular 08/349 relating to details regarding the information to be notified with respect to major holdings. On 27 June 2016 the CSSF also updated its Q&A on The Transparency Law and the Grand-Ducal transparency regulation. KEY CHANGES: For issuers for which Luxembourg is the home Member State: reduction of administrative burden by the removal of certain transparency requirements. For foreign issuers for which Luxembourg is the home Member State and who are active in extractive industries or the logging of primary forests: new requirement to publish a report on payments to governments. For investors: notification obligations are now imposed on investors taking exposure on shares via a much wider range of financial instruments, the definition of which is considerably widened, and introduction of aggregation rules. The CSSF receives significant new injunction and sanction powers. Changes are also introduced with respect to the disclosure of the home Member State. 1 Directive 2013/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market (the Transparency Directive ), Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading and Commission Directive 2007/14/EC laying down detailed rules for the implementation of certain provisions of Directive 2004/109/EC. 2 Directive 2014/51/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 amending Directives 2003/71/EC and 2009/138/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009, (EU) No 1094/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 in respect of the powers of the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) and the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority). 6585611_2

1. Main changes for issuers with Luxembourg as home Member State: Quarterly financial reports: The requirement to publish interim management statements or quarterly financial reports is now formally abolished. In its press release of 27 November 2015 the CSSF had already announced it would not take any enforcement action against issuers not publishing quarterly reports or interim statements for the period ending September 30, 2015 or thereafter. This was because the deadline for implementing the Amending Directive expired on 26 November 2015. A quarterly financial report which has been made available to the public by an issuer on its own initiative or to comply with another legal or regulated obligation constitutes, in principal, inside information. Accordingly, such a quarterly financial report must be published in accordance with the Transparency Law and Regulation (EU) N 596/2014 on market abuse, meaning it must be distributed in an efficient manner, stored at the Officially Appointed Mechanism ( OAM ) and filed with the CSSF 3. Reports on payments to governments: Issuers for which Luxembourg is the home Member State for purposes of the Transparency Directive and which are active in the extractive industries or the logging of primary forests must, beginning with their financial year starting on or after 1 st January 2016, publish an annual report on payments made to governments. That report must comply with the requirements set out in Directive 2013/34/EU 4. The report constitutes regulated information for the purposes of the Transparency Law 5. For Luxembourg incorporated issuers, this requirement had already been introduced into company law by a law of 18 th December 2015 6. The deadline for publishing such report for all issuers subject to the Transparency Law is 6 months after the end of the financial year (versus 12 months under article 340sexies of the law of 10 th August 1915 on commercial companies for other issuers). Issuers may also include the report on payments to governments in their annual financial report, which must be published within 4 months after the end of the financial year 7. 3 CSSF Q&A, 27 June 2016, question 7. 4 Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC. 5 CSSF Circular 08/337 (as amended), section 3. 6 Law of 18 December 2015 amending the law of 10 th August 1915 on commercial companies and the law of 19 th December 2002 on the register of commerce and the accounting and annual account of undertakings and implementing Directive 2013/34/EU. For the consolidated report: articles 340 ter et seq. of the law of 10 August 1915 on commercial companies. For the stand alone report: article 72 septies of the law of 19 December 2002 on the register of commerce and companies and the accounting and annual accounts of undertakings, as amended. 7 CSSF Q&A, 27 June 2016, question 52. 2

Extension of publication deadline and of the period during which information must be available: The deadline for publishing half-yearly financial reports is extended from 2 to 3 months after the end of the reporting period. The period during which annual financial reports and half-yearly financial reports must remain publicly available is extended from 5 to 10 years 8. Reports on payments to governments must also remain available during 10 years. It should be noted that the CSSF considers that the declaration of the persons responsible within the issuer (which forms part of the financial reports) must cover the statutory accounts and the consolidated accounts and that issuers who publish their statutory accounts separately from the consolidated accounts should make either two declarations or one declaration that covers the statutory accounts and the consolidated accounts 9. New bond issues and proposed changes to articles: The obligations to disclose new bond issues to the market and to communicate to the CSSF proposed amendments to the issuer s articles of association are abolished. In its November 27, 2015 press release, the CSSF had, likewise to what is mentioned above, indicated it would not take enforcement action against issuers who failed to comply with these requirements after 26 November 2015. It must be noted though that should a bond issue or a proposed change to the articles constitute non-public price sensitive information, issuers will remain liable to publish such information. The same applies to documents made available for the preparation of a general meeting of shareholders which must be deposited at the CSSF, stored at the Officially Appointed Mechanism and distributed in accordance with the Transparency Law, if they meet the criteria of inside information 10, within the meaning of the Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse) 11. New home Member State rules (i) Issuers of shares and retail debt instruments For the determination of the home Member State of third country issuers of shares or debt instruments with denominations per unit of less than EUR 1,000 (or its equivalent) ( retail debt instruments ), the Transparency Law no longer cross-refers to the Prospectus Directive. Such issuers have the option to select a home Member State for purposes of the Transparency Law amongst those EU 8 The time limit of 10 years concerns reports published as from 15 May 2016; for reports published before 15 May 2016, the time limit is of at least 5 years (CSSF Circular 08/337 (as amended), section 3, i and ii). 9 CSSF Q&A, 27 June 2016, question question 18. 10 CSSF Q&A, 27 June 2016, question question 49. 11 According to the CSSF (Press Release 16/31), as from 3 July 2016, Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on market abuse is binding and directly applicable in Luxembourg regardless of the fact that the Luxembourg legislator has not yet specifically adjusted the Luxembourg law of 9 May 2006 on market abuse, as amended, implementing in Luxembourg the Directive 2003/6/EC. 3

Member States where their shares or retail debt instruments are admitted to dealing on a regulated market. This choice is not limited in time and may be changed by those third country issuers in the circumstances summarised below in (iii). The determination of the home Member State of EU issuers of shares or retail debt instruments remains unchanged (i.e. the Member State of the issuer s registered office) as does the principle that the home Member State determination rule applicable in case of issuers of shares or retail debt instruments prevails in case of those issuers which also issue debt securities with denominations per unit of at least EUR 1,000 (or its equivalent) ( wholesale debt securities ) 12. (ii) Issuers of wholesale securities The general rule on determination of the home Member State for EU and third country issuers of wholesale debt securities remains the same: these issuers have the option to select their home Member State amongst the Member State of their registered office and the Member State(s) where their debt instruments are admitted to dealing on a regulated market The choice of home Member State by issuers of wholesale debt securities remains valid for 3 years unless (x) the wholesale debt instruments of such issuer are no longer admitted to dealing on a regulated market, or (y) if during such 3 year period the issuer s shares or retail debt instruments subsequently become admitted to dealing on a regulated market (in which case the rules for determination of the home Member State of share or retail debt instruments issuers apply), or (z) if the circumstances summarised in (iii) below occur during such 3 years 13. (iii) Option to change home Member State A third country issuer of shares or retail debt instruments or an issuer (EU or third country) of wholesale debt securities, whose securities are no longer admitted to dealing on a regulated market in its then home Member State, but where its securities continue to be so admitted in one or more other Member States, may chose its home Member State amongst those other Member States and, in case of an EU issuer, the Member State of its registered office... 12 CSSF Circular 08/337 (as amended), section 2. 13 CSSF Q&A, 27 June 2016, question 54. 4

(iv) Disclosure of home Member State 2. Changes for investors: Issuers of securities must publish their home Member State and must notify their choice of home Member State to (i) the competent authority of the Member State where they have their registered office (if they are organised within the European Union), (ii) the competent authority of their home Member State and (iii) the competent authorities of all host Member States. For issuers of wholesale debt instruments or third country issuers of shares or retail debt instruments having failed to publish their choice of home Member States within 3 months from the date their securities are first admitted to trading on a regulated market, the home Member State will be deemed to be the Member State where the securities are so admitted to trading Where securities are so admitted on regulated markets in more than one Member State, all these Member States shall be considered as home Member States, which means those issuers will be subject to the regulations and in particular reporting requirements of all these Member States. That situation will remain until such issuers shall have opted for one home Member State and have published that choice. The information on the home Member State constitutes regulated information for the purposes of the Transparency Law 14 and accordingly needs to be published in the manner required for regulated information, filed with the CSSF and stored with the OAM. The CSSF considers that issuers, who have not made their home Member State public before 15 May 2016, will be under the obligation to do so by 15 August 2016 15. Significant broader list of financial instruments triggering the obligation to notify the acquisition or disposal of major holdings: In addition to where they directly or indirectly hold shares in an issuer, individuals and legal entities will be subject to notification obligations if they, directly or indirectly, hold: (a) financial instruments which, on maturity, give the holder, under a formal agreement (that is, an agreement which is binding under applicable law), either the unconditional right to acquire or the discretion to acquire already issued shares with voting rights of an issuer whose shares are admitted to trading on a regulated market; and/or (b) financial instruments other than those included in (a) but which are referenced to issued shares with voting rights and whose economic effect is similar to that of the instruments referred to in (a). The instruments under (b) will be in scope irrespective of whether they confer a right to physical or cash settlement (article 12 of the amended Transparency Law). 14 CSSF Circular 08/337 (as amended), section 3. 15 CSSF Circular 08/337 (as amended), section 4, c. 5

These financial instruments include transferable securities, option agreements, futures, swaps, forward rate agreements, contracts for differences and any other agreements with a similar economic effect. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has drawn up a list of financial instruments subject to notification requirements 16. With respect to financial instruments held before 15 May 2016, the CSSF, in its press release of 17 May 2016, extended the deadline by which these holdings needed to be notified to 31 May 2016. Sale and purchase agreements relating to shares to which voting rights are attached but which are subject to conditions precedents such as for example regulatory or antitrust consents, will be considered to constitute a financial instrument within the meaning of sub-paragraph (b) of article 12 (1) of the Transparency Law 17. Aggregation: Contrary to the situation before the enactment of the amendments to the Transparency Law, investors holding both shares with voting rights and qualifying financial instruments, will now need to aggregate the underlying voting rights and to notify such holdings if the aggregate number of voting rights reaches or exceeds (or falls below) a reporting percentage. The CSSF by its press release of 17 May 2016 extended the deadline to 31 May 2016 for holders coming into an obligation for notifying major holdings as a result of aggregation. Obligation to notify of the ultimate economic beneficiary: The CSSF has emphasised that the obligation to notify the acquisition or disposal of major holdings, as provided for by article 8 of the amended Transparency Law, also applies to the ultimate economic beneficiaries of the voting rights (irrespective of whether these are individuals or legal entities), indirectly holding these voting rights 18. Calculation of voting rights in case of qualifying financial instruments: In principle, the number of voting rights must be counted by reference to the full notional amount of shares underlying qualifying financial instruments. However, where a financial instrument provides exclusively for a cash settlement, the number of voting rights is calculated on a delta-adjusted basis by multiplying the notional amount of underlying shares by the delta of the instrument. Investors must aggregate and notify all financial instruments relating to the same underlying issuer. Long positions may not be netted with short positions. Trusts and entities without legal personality: The notification obligations are extended to trusts and entities without legal personality. 16 ESMA/2015/1598, Indicative list of financial instruments that are subject to notification requirements according to Article 13(1b) of the revised Transparency Directive, 22 October 2015. 17 CSSF Q&A, 27 June 2016, question 56. 18 CSSF Circular 08/349 (as amended), section 2. 6

Notification period: The 4 Luxembourg 19 stock exchange days period for notification now starts on the day following the day on which the trigger event occurs (typically, but not limited to, the day of the acquisition or sale of shares or entry into of a qualifying financial instrument), irrespective of whether that trigger event day is a Luxembourg stock exchange day or not. Additional exemption: Voting rights attached to shares acquired for stabilisation purposes (in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 2273/2003 of 22 December 2003 20 ) are excluded from the scope of the mandatory notification of acquisition or disposal of major holdings provided that the voting rights attached to those shares are not exercised or otherwise used to intervene in the management of the relevant issuer. 3. Extension of CSSF powers: The Amending Law increases the powers of the CSSF to ensure that the provisions of the Transparency Law are complied with. The CSSF now has the express power in case of non-compliance with the Transparency Law to require (i) that regulated information be re-published or re-notified, (ii) that a corrected version of the regulated information be published or notified or (iii) that the correction or modification be made in the publication or notification of subsequent regulated information. The law now specifies that in addition to the power to order issuers or holders of shares or other financial instruments as well as certain other persons to comply with the law, the CSSF also has the power to enjoin them to cease the conduct in breach and to desist from any repetition of that conduct. The Amending Law also clarifies that the CSSF has the power to direct the withdrawal of securities from trading in case of breach or suspected breach of the Transparency Law. 4. Penalties: The Amending Law has implemented the penalties provided for by the Amending Directive. In case of failure to make public or notify regulated information or notify the acquisition or disposal of a major holding within the required time limit, the CSSF may impose the following administrative pecuniary sanctions: (i) in case of legal entities, fines may reach the higher of (i) 10,000,000 euros or 5% of their annual turnover (on a consolidated basis for groups) or (ii) twice the amount of the profits gained or losses avoided because of the breach, where 19 Including for issuers which are not listed in Luxembourg. 20 Commission Regulation (EC) No 2273/2003 of 22 December 2003 implementing Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards exemptions for buy-back programmes and stabilisation of financial instruments. 7

(ii) those can be determined; in case of individuals, fines may reach the higher of (i) 2,000,000 euros or (ii) twice the amount of the profits or losses avoided because of the breach, where those can be determined. In the event of non-compliance by a legal entity, sanctions can be applied to the members of its administrative, management or supervisory bodies, and to any other individuals who are responsible for the non-compliance under applicable law. 5. Publication of sanctions: As required by the Amending Directive, every sanction decision of the CSSF for noncompliance with the Transparency Law shall be published on the CSSF website. The publication shall include the type and nature of the non-compliance and the identity of the individuals and legal entities responsible for therefor. Such publication may be delayed or be made on anonymous basis (i) where, in the event that the sanction is imposed on an individual, publication of personal data is determined to represent a disproportionate sanction; (ii) where publication would seriously jeopardize the stability of the financial system or an ongoing official investigation; or (iii) where publication would, in so far as it can be determined, cause disproportionate and serious damage to the institutions or individuals involved. 8