UNIVERSITY OF OSLO. Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

Similar documents
UNIVERSITY OF OSLO. Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

B8.3 Week 2 summary 2018

Binomial model: numerical algorithm

1. In this exercise, we can easily employ the equations (13.66) (13.70), (13.79) (13.80) and

Put-Call Parity. Put-Call Parity. P = S + V p V c. P = S + max{e S, 0} max{s E, 0} P = S + E S = E P = S S + E = E P = E. S + V p V c = (1/(1+r) t )E

FINANCIAL OPTION ANALYSIS HANDOUTS

Option Valuation with Binomial Lattices corrected version Prepared by Lara Greden, Teaching Assistant ESD.71

IAPM June 2012 Second Semester Solutions

Chapter 14 Exotic Options: I

REAL OPTIONS ANALYSIS HANDOUTS

Homework Assignments

Martingale Pricing Theory in Discrete-Time and Discrete-Space Models

FINANCIAL OPTION ANALYSIS HANDOUTS

MATH3075/3975 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS

Name: MULTIPLE CHOICE. 1 (5) a b c d e. 2 (5) a b c d e TRUE/FALSE 1 (2) TRUE FALSE. 3 (5) a b c d e 2 (2) TRUE FALSE.

6: MULTI-PERIOD MARKET MODELS

Pricing theory of financial derivatives

Fixed Income and Risk Management

4: SINGLE-PERIOD MARKET MODELS

Lecture Notes on Discrete-time Finance. Chuanshu Ji

M339W/389W Financial Mathematics for Actuarial Applications University of Texas at Austin Sample In-Term Exam I Instructor: Milica Čudina

MATH 5510 Mathematical Models of Financial Derivatives. Topic 1 Risk neutral pricing principles under single-period securities models

Compulsory Assignment

3.2 No-arbitrage theory and risk neutral probability measure

Introduction Random Walk One-Period Option Pricing Binomial Option Pricing Nice Math. Binomial Models. Christopher Ting.

M339W/M389W Financial Mathematics for Actuarial Applications University of Texas at Austin In-Term Exam I Instructor: Milica Čudina

Chapter 24 Interest Rate Models

MS-E2114 Investment Science Lecture 10: Options pricing in binomial lattices

Pricing Options with Binomial Trees

Multi-Period Binomial Option Pricing - Outline

No-arbitrage Pricing Approach and Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing

MORE REALISTIC FOR STOCKS, FOR EXAMPLE

Financial Engineering

Fundamental Theorems of Asset Pricing. 3.1 Arbitrage and risk neutral probability measures

Arbitrage Pricing. What is an Equivalent Martingale Measure, and why should a bookie care? Department of Mathematics University of Texas at Austin

Optimal Investment with Deferred Capital Gains Taxes

On the Lower Arbitrage Bound of American Contingent Claims

Lattice Model of System Evolution. Outline

INTRODUCTION TO ARBITRAGE PRICING OF FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES

Lattice Model of System Evolution. Outline

Reviewing the Leverage Cycle

MAFS525 Computational Methods for Pricing Structured Products. Topic 1 Lattice tree methods

Degree project. Pricing American and European options under the binomial tree model and its Black-Scholes limit model

Discrete time interest rate models

Hedging and Pricing in the Binomial Model

Last Time. Martingale inequalities Martingale convergence theorem Uniformly integrable martingales. Today s lecture: Sections 4.4.1, 5.

2 The binomial pricing model

Basics of Derivative Pricing

The Binomial Lattice Model for Stocks: Introduction to Option Pricing

Notes: This is a closed book and closed notes exam. The maximal score on this exam is 100 points. Time: 75 minutes

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO. Please make sure that your copy of the problem set is complete before you attempt to answer anything.

Martingale Measure TA

Corporate Finance, Module 21: Option Valuation. Practice Problems. (The attached PDF file has better formatting.) Updated: July 7, 2005

Solutions to Midterm Exam. ECON Financial Economics Boston College, Department of Economics Spring Tuesday, March 19, 10:30-11:45am

The Multistep Binomial Model

Derivative Securities Section 9 Fall 2004 Notes by Robert V. Kohn, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences.

Answer Key: Problem Set 4

Lecture 8: Introduction to asset pricing

Computational Finance. Computational Finance p. 1

Basic Arbitrage Theory KTH Tomas Björk

Optimal Investment for Worst-Case Crash Scenarios

UNIT 5 DECISION MAKING

Using the Minimal Entropy Martingale Measure to Valuate Real Options in Multinomial Lattices

The Analytics of Information and Uncertainty Answers to Exercises and Excursions

An Introduction to Stochastic Calculus

Supply Contracts with Financial Hedging

Lecture 8: Asset pricing

LYING FOR STRATEGIC ADVANTAGE: RATIONAL AND BOUNDEDLY RATIONAL MISREPRESENTATION OF INTENTIONS Vince Crawford, UCSD, October 2001

Expected Utility And Risk Aversion

MS-E2114 Investment Science Exercise 10/2016, Solutions

Lattice (Binomial Trees) Version 1.2

The Binomial Lattice Model for Stocks: Introduction to Option Pricing

Risk Neutral Valuation

MATH 361: Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I

Multi-Asset Options. A Numerical Study VILHELM NIKLASSON FRIDA TIVEDAL. Master s thesis in Engineering Mathematics and Computational Science

non linear Payoffs Markus K. Brunnermeier

Derivation of the Price of Bond in the Recovery of Market Value Model

3 Stock under the risk-neutral measure

Exponential utility maximization under partial information

LECTURE 2: MULTIPERIOD MODELS AND TREES

Game Theory with Applications to Finance and Marketing, I

Haiyang Feng College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin , CHINA

THE MARTINGALE METHOD DEMYSTIFIED

Solutions to Problem Set 1

A Robust Option Pricing Problem

Lockbox Separation. William F. Sharpe June, 2007

Lecture 3: Review of mathematical finance and derivative pricing models

Answers to Problem Set 4

Are the Azéma-Yor processes truly remarkable?

2.1 Mean-variance Analysis: Single-period Model

Martingales. by D. Cox December 2, 2009

Optimal stopping problems for a Brownian motion with a disorder on a finite interval

Notes: This is a closed book and closed notes exam. The maximal score on this exam is 100 points. Time: 75 minutes

A Worst-Case Approach to Option Pricing in Crash-Threatened Markets

Real Options and Game Theory in Incomplete Markets

w E(Q w) w/100 E(Q w) w/

Hedging with Life and General Insurance Products

Topics in Contract Theory Lecture 5. Property Rights Theory. The key question we are staring from is: What are ownership/property rights?

Corporate Finance - Yossi Spiegel

Stochastic modelling of electricity markets Pricing Forwards and Swaps

Transcription:

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Examination in MAT2700 Introduction to mathematical finance and investment theory. Day of examination: November, 2015. Examination hours:??.????.?? This problem set consists of 7 pages. Appendices: Permitted aids: None. None. Please make sure that your copy of the problem set is complete before you attempt to answer anything. Problem 1 Consider the following three period model with 10 scenarios, one stock and one bond, initially priced as B 0 = 1 and an interest rate of r = 0.1. S 1 = 90 S 2 = 70 S 2 = 110 S = 60 ω 1 S = 80 ω 2 S = 100 ω S = 10 ω 4 S 0 = 100 S 2 = 100 S = 90 ω 5 S = 120 ω 6 S 1 = 120 S 2 = 110 S = 100 ω 7 S = 140 ω 8 S 2 = 140 S = 120 ω 9 S = 160 ω 10 1a Find the equivalent martingale measures for this model and characterize those derivatives which are attainable. (Continued on page 2.)

Examination in MAT2700, November, 2015. Page 2 Possible solution: The conditional risk neutral probabilities are q u = 1/ q d = 2/ q uu = 11/40 q ud = 29/40 q du = λ q dm = 2/5 2λ q dd = /5 + λ q uuu = /20 q uud = 17/20 q udu = /10 q udd = 7/10 q duu = 1/ q dud = 2/ q dmu = 1/5 q dmd = 4/5 q ddu = /10 q ddd = 7/10, where λ is in the interval (0, 1/5). This gives an equivalent martingale measure Q given by Q(ω 1 ) = Q(ω 2 ) = 187 Q(ω ) = 29 400 Q(ω 4 ) = 20 Q(ω 5 ) = λ 2 Q(ω 6 ) = λ 4 Q(ω 7 ) = 4 9 9 75 4 15 λ Q(ω 8 ) = 16 75 16 15 λ Q(ω 9) = 9 50 + 1 5 λ Q(ω 10) = 21 75 + 14 15 λ. For any derivative with payoff D i = D(ω i ) we have E Q (D) = D 1 + 187 D 2 + 29 400 D + 20 D 4 + 4 75 D 7 + 16 75 D 8 + 9 50 D 9 + 21 75 D 10 ( 2 + λ 9 D 5 + 4 9 D 6 4 15 D 7 26 15 D 8 + 1 5 D 9 + 14 15 D 10 The attainable derivatives are those for which the last term in brackets is zero. ) 1b Find the range of fair prices at t = 0 of the put option with payoff max {100 S, 0}. Possible solution: For this put option we have D 1 = 40, D 2 = 20, D = 0, D 4 = 0, D 5 = 10, D 6 = 0, D 7 = 0, D 8 = 0, D 9 = 0, D 10 = 0. Hence any fair price is given by E Q ( D) = 1 1.1 ( 40 20 187 + + 20 ) 9 λ. (Continued on page.)

Examination in MAT2700, November, 2015. Page Therefore πd b = 1 ( 40 1.1 π a D = 1 1.1 ( 40 ) 20 187 + 1.5840 + 20 187 + 10 20 9 1 5 ) 5.4155. The range of fair prices is the interval (π b D, πa D ). 1c Let D be the derivative with payoff at t = defined by { 1 i = 4 or i = 5, D(ω i ) = 0 otherwise, at define D t to be its conditional expectation, i.e., D t = E Q [ D Ft ], where F t is the filtration defined by stock price. Find D 1. Possible solution: Since D 1 is measurable with respect to F 1 it takes a value at the node u and another at the node d. These values are given by D 1 (u) = 1 1 D 1 (d) = 1 2 4 i=1 10 i=5 D(ω i )Q(ω i ) = Q(ω 4 ) = 20 400 D(ω i )Q(ω i ) = 2 2 9 λ = λ. Problem 2 Consider the following binary three period model with one stock. (Continued on page 4.)

Examination in MAT2700, November, 2015. Page 4 S 2 = 14 S = 16 ω 1 S 1 = 12 S = 12 ω 2 S 2 = 10 S = 12 ω S 0 = 10 S = 9 ω 4 S 2 = 11 S = 1 ω 5 S 1 = 9 S = 10 ω 6 S 2 = 7 S = 8 ω 7 S = 6 ω 8 Assume that the interest rate is 0 and that the initial bond price is B 0 = 1. 2a Show that the model is complete and find the unique equivalent martingale measure Q. Possible solution: The risk neutral conditional probabilities are q u = 1/ q d = 2/ q uu = 1/2 q ud = 1/2 q du = 1/2 q dd = 1/2 q uuu = 1/2 q uud = 1/2 q udu = 1/ q udd = 2/ q duu = 1/ q dud = 2/ q ddu = 1/2 q ddd = 1/2. From this we get the equivalent martingale measure Q(ω 1 ) = 1 12 Q(ω 2 ) = 1 12 Q(ω ) = 1 18 Q(ω 4 ) = 1 9 Q(ω 5 ) = 1 9 Q(ω 6 ) = 2 9 Q(ω 7 ) = 1 6 Q(ω 8 ) = 1 6. The model is viable and complete since we have a unique equivalent martingale measure. (Continued on page 5.)

Examination in MAT2700, November, 2015. Page 5 2b Let X be the random variable defined by 1 i = 1, X(ω i ) = 1 i = 5, 0 otherwise, and let F t be the filtration defined by the stock prices. For which t is X measurable with respect to F t? Possible solution: X is measurable with respect to F t iff it takes a single value on each t-node. This is the case only for t =. 2c Find the conditional expectation Y t = E Q { X F t } for t = 0, 1. Possible solution: We have that also Y 0 = E Q (X) = Q(ω 1 ) Q(ω 5 ) = 1 12 1 9 = 1 6, Y 1 (u) = 1 1 Q(ω 1 ) = 1 4, Y 1 (d) = 1 2 ( Q(ω 5 )) = 1 6. 2d Find the fair price of the European call option with payoff max {S 10, 0}. Possible solution: We find the payoff of the derivative for each scenario, 6, i = 1, 2 i = 2,, D(ω i ) = 0 i = 4, 6, 7, 8, i = 5. Hence the fair price is D 0 = E Q (D) = 6 1 ( 1 12 + 2 12 + 1 ) + 1 18 6 = 2 18. (Continued on page 6.)

Examination in MAT2700, November, 2015. Page 6 2e Assume that the real world probability of ω i is P(ω i ) = 1/8 for each i = 1,..., 8. Given an initial wealth V 0, find a trading strategy Φ = {(x t, y t )} t=0 which maximizes the expected utility of the wealth at t =, u(v Φ ), for the utility function u(v) = ln(v). Possible solution: We use the martingale method to find this trading strategy. Since the utility function is the logarithm, the optimal derivative is /2 i = 1, D(ω i ) = V 0 P(ω i ) Q(ω i ) = V 0 /2 i = 2, 9/4 i =, 9/8 i = 4, 9/8 i = 5, 9/16 i = 6, /4, i = 7, /4 i = 8. To save ink, all numbers, i.e., the strategy and the values, are in multiples of V 0. We must find a portfolio for each of the four submodels at uu, ud, du and dd. At uu we must solve the equations This gives Similarly for the other 2-nodes For the 1-nodes we get At the root node we must solve x + 16y = 2 x + 12y = 2. Φ 2 (uu) = (/2, 0), V Φ 2 (uu) = /2. Φ 2 (ud) = ( 9/4, /8), V Φ 2 (ud) = /2, Φ 2 (du) = ( 21/16, /16), V Φ 2 (du) = /4, Φ 2 (dd) = (/4, 0), V Φ 2 (dd) = /4. Φ 2 (u) = (/2, 0), V Φ 1 (u) = /2, Φ 2 (d) = (/4, 0), V Φ 1 (d) = /4. x + 12y = /2, x + 9y = /4, which gives Φ 1 = ( /2, 1/4), V Φ 0 = 1. (Continued on page 7.)

Examination in MAT2700, November, 2015. Page 7 THE END