Availment of Credit based on computer generated invoice: Pre and Post Budget

Similar documents
GENERAL PROCEDURES UNDER CENTRAL EXCISE

Applicability of CST/ VAT on E-Commerce Transactions:

Rate of service tax restored to 12% As per section 66, rate of service tax is 12% of the value of taxable services. However, in February 2009, the

REFUND AND REBATE - A service tax perspective

Distribution of CENVAT by Input Service Distributor

6 SERVICE TAX PROCEDURES

REFUND UNDER SERVICE TAX

Summary of Notifications, Circulars from 16 th June2015 to 15 th July2015 SERVICE TAX. 1. Detailed Manual Scrutiny of Service Tax Returns

CENVAT CREDIT. Join with us SIGNIFICANT NOTIFICATIONS/CIRCULARS ISSUED BETWEEN TO

GOODS AND SERVICE TAX (GST) TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS COMPILED AND PREPARED BY : CA SAGAR THAKKAR

Part I : Statutory Update Indirect Tax Laws

EXPORT BENEFITS UNDER SERVICE TAX CA. MANINDAR KAKARLA

Excise Duty on Textile Sector: Increased cost and Compliance Burden

CENTRAL EXCISE, RULES,

The Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback (Amendment) Rules, 2006.

INDIRECT TAXES UPDATE 136

APPLICABLE FROM 16/03/2016

CLARIFICATION ON ISSUES RELATING TO CENVAT CREDIT RULES 2004

CHANGES IN THE CENTRAL EXCISE AND CENVAT CREDIT RULES

[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB- SECTION (i)] GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE

Union Budget CA. Ashok Batra. (The author is a member of the Institute. He can be reached at )

BUDGET ANALYSIS All right Reserved with Bizsolindia Services Pvt. Ltd.

INDIRECT TAXES Central Excise and Customs Case Law Update

[TO BE PUBLISHED IN PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i) OF THE GAZZETE OF INDIA (EXTRAORDINARY)]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2016 VERSUS J U D G M E N T

2015-TIOL-1036-CESTAT-MUM IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL WEST ZONAL BENCH, MUMBAI COURT NO.I

SERVICE TAX. 2.1 It has been proposed in the Finance Bill to extend the levy of service tax to following new services,-

Chapter VIII Accounts and Records

Summary of Notifications, Circulars from 16 th September, 2016 to 15 th October, 2016

F. No. 137/85/2007-CX. 4 Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs New Delhi

ROUTINE PROCEDURES

Significant Initiativestaken by CBEC

THE CENTRAL SALES TAX (RAJASTHAN) RULES,

INDIRECT TAX NON TARIFF. All the amendments in the said rule are applicable from 1st April 2011 except otherwise specified.

Section - 206C, Income-tax Act,

FAQ on filing of Transition form

APPLICABILITY OF SERVICE TAX:

Service tax. (d) substitute the word "client" with the words "any person" in the specified taxable services;

Accounts and Records. Chapter VI. FAQ s. Accounts and other records (Section 35)

1. Inclusion of cases filed with Settlement Commission in the "Call-Book"

Central Board of Excise & Customs

Notification No. 18/2012 Central Excise (N.T.)

Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-II. WNS Global Services

2015 (1) TMI CESTAT NEW DELHI

Summary of Notifications, Circulars from 16 th June, 2016 to 15 th July, 2016

[To be published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section

Refunds and Rebates in Service Tax

CENVAT Credit for service providers. By CA Rahul S. Jain

Indirect Tax- Latest Judicial Precedents

Goods and Services Tax CA. Sathish V & CA. Krishna J August 2017

Summons, Investigation, Audit, Special Audit, Show cause Notice, Appeals. Bharat Raichandani Advocate

Adjudication Procedure, Recovery of Tax, Penalty and Arrest Provisions K E V I N S H A H C H A R T E R E D A C C O U N T A N T

13 TH NANI PALKHIVALA MEMORIAL NATIONAL TAX MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2017 MOOT PROPOSITION

E-filing under Service Tax

Government of Gujarat Finance Department, Sachivalaya, Gandhinagar Dated the 1 st, 2006

Inspection, Search, Seizure and Arrest

Indirect Tax- Latest Judicial Precedents

CENVAT CREDIT Recent Court Rulings Presented by: Ca. Jayesh Gogri

[2016] 68 taxmann.com 41 (Mumbai - CESTAT) CESTAT, MUMBAI BENCH. Commissioner of Service Tax. Vs. Lionbridge Technologies (P.) Ltd.

SEMINAR ON ISSUES IN SERVICE TAX RETURNS

Transitional Provisions

Credit allowed on capital goods use to manufacture exempted intermediate product as duty was paid on final product

Assessment. Chapter XII

THE CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS

Time of Supply of Services - Present Vs GST

SERVICE TAX NOTIFICATION

GOODS & SERVICES TAX UPDATE 2

Rule 8 (3A) of CE Rules, 2002 Is it all pervasive? (G. Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy associates)

Important Service Tax Amendments through Union Budget 2016 (By CA. Vikas Khandelwal) 1. Krishi Kalyan Cess (Applicable w. e. f

NOTIFICATION. (Sindh Sales Tax on Services)

2011-TIOL-443-HC-MAD-CUS IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS. C.M.A.No.3727 of 2004, W.P of 2011 and W.P of 1998 and CMP.No.

Audit. Chapter XIII. 65. Audit by tax authorities 66. Special audit

sought to examine eligibility to credit on the construction sector credit to service providers.

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : FINANCE ACT, 1994 Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 4456/2012 & C.M.No.9237/2012( for stay)

i. On or before the due date of furnishing the return for the month of September 2018 i.e (unless extended). OR

Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013

Answer to MTP_Final_Syllabus 2016_Jun2017_Set 2 Paper 18- Indirect Tax Laws and Practice

Amnesty Scheme {Chapter VI of Finance Act,2013} Presented By CA Avinash Poddar

Audit. Chapter XI. FAQ s. Audit by Tax Authorities (Section 65)

Service tax. Key Budget Proposals and Amendments. Union Budget

Inspection, Search, Seizure and Arrest

Cenvat Credit Rules 2004

KHANDHAR MEHTA AND SHAH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. ITA No-160/2005. Judgment reserved on: 12th March, 2007

CENTRAL EXCISE RULES,

THE MIZORAM PROFESSIONS, TRADES, CALLINGS AND EMPLOYMENTS TAXATION RULES, 1996 N O T I F I C A T I O N

GST transitional provisions on credits key issues and challenges. Sagar Shah 17 June 2017

CS Professional Programme Solution June Paper - 6 Module-III Advanced Tax Laws and Practice Part-A

[2016] CESTAT) CESTAT, MUMBAI BENCH

VERENDRA KALRA & CO INDIRECT TAX REVIEW MARCH 2016 CUSTOMS EXCISE SERVICE TAX VALUE ADDED TAX. Inside this edition. Like always, Like never before

Controversies in CENVAT Credit. CA Sunil Gabhawalla

INDIRECT TAX LAWS & PRACTICE. Paper-18. Syllabus Set-1. Answer of Postal test Paper. Set-1.

2. Summary of legal provisions at a glance. Prepared by: C. P. Goyal, IRS Date of Preparation: Export of Goods or Services under GST Laws

WEBINAR ON - GST REFUND

INDIRECT TAX UPDATES RSA Legal Solutions 11 th August 2017

Composition. Exports

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE PRESENT. THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE AND. STRP Nos OF 2013*

The Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Rules, 1999

Service Tax on ocean freight the recent changes. (G. Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associates)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR C.S.T.A. NO.

Transcription:

Availment of Credit based on computer generated invoice: Pre and Post Budget 2015-16 -By CA Ashish Chaudhary Availment of credit based on unsigned invoice or printed signature on computers generated invoice has at times been an area of audit objections by departmental official during the audit, verification, investigation. The law was silent on the issuance of computerized invoice and taking of credit based on computerized invoice. Finance Act 2015 has provided specific provisions for issuance of digitally signed invoices and preservations of records in computerised form authenticated by digital signature. Notification No. 18/2015 has been issued specifying the conditions, safeguards and procedures to be followed. Paper writer has made an attempt to understand the requirement of new provisions and its impact on credit availment. Document for availment of credit: Rule 9 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 prescribes eligible documents on the basis of which credit can be availed of tax paid on inputs and input services. An extract of the said rule has been produced below: Rule 9 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, The CENVAT credit shall be taken by the manufacturer or the provider of output service or input service distributor, as the case may be, on the basis of any of the following documents, namely :- (a) (f)an invoice, a bill or challan issued by a provider of input service on or after the 10th day of September, 2004. (g)an invoice, bill or challan issued by an input service distributor under rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 As per the said rule, a manufacturer or output service provider may take credit on the basis of invoice issued by provider of input service. But it important to note that the in clause (f) referred above, there is no specific mention of Rule 4A of Service Tax Rules whereas in clause (g) the reference of Rule 4A is specifically given. It may be inferred that for availing the credit, mere invoice issued by service provider would be sufficient even though not

issued in terms of Rule 4A of Service Tax Rules, 1994. However, there may be another interpretation also as per which Rule 4A was inserted w.e.f. 10.9.2004 and by making reference of the said date in the above rule, the legislature had intended that invoice would invariably be issued under that rule and may be due to which no explicit reference of Rule 4A has been made. Reference of CCR and IT Act It would be relevant to discuss certain other provision of law (Cenvat Credit Rules as well as Information Technology Act) which may be relevant in this regard: CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 Rule 9 of CCR which prescribes the eligible documents for taking credit has proviso providing the following: Provided that if the said document does not contain all the particulars but contains the details of duty or service tax payable, description of the goods or taxable service, [assessable value, Central Excise or Service tax registration number of the person issuing the invoice, as the case may be,] name and address of the factory or warehouse or premises of first or second stage dealers or [provider of output service], and the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise or the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, is satisfied that the goods or services covered by the said document have been received and accounted for in the books of the account of the receiver, he may allow the CENVAT credit.] Hence, the said proviso clearly provides that even if signature is missing on the invoice,the AC/DC may allow the credit to service receiver. Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 5 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 renders legal recognition to electronic signatures. The same has been produced below: Where any law provides that information or any other matter shall be authenticated by affixing the signature or any document shall be signed or bear the signature of any person then, notwithstanding anything contained in such law, such requirement shall be deemed to have been satisfied, if such information or matter is

authenticated by means of electronic signature affixed in such manner as may be prescribed by the Central Government The above section renders an overriding effect of the IT Act, 2000 over all other laws. Furthermore, explanation to the above section states For the purposes of this section, "signed", with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions, shall, with reference to a person, mean affixing of his hand written signature or any mark on any document and the expression "signature" shall be construed accordingly. Hence, the above section provides that signature shall include any mark/ impression on the document that authenticates such document. Moreover, Rule 4 A (1) of Service Tax Rules state that invoice should be signed but nowhere does it says that it should be signed in ink. Judicial precedents: On similar issue, certain judgments have been delivered which are summarized as below: Dewshree Network Pvt. Ltd. v/s Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Surat, (2014-TIOL-246-CESTAT-AHM)STAY Matter (not final judgment): held that CENVAT credit availed on the basis of computer generated invoices issued by service provider is prima facie ineligible as such practice is not in accordance with the Service Tax Rules read with the provisions of Rule 9 of the CENVAT Credit Rule, 2004. CREATIVE ARCHITECTS & INTERIORS (Commissioner Appeal): No signature on invoice - Invoice, computer-generated, no signature required - Credit allowable - Rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 SUKAM GRAVURES LTD. 2008 (225) E.L.T. 66 (Tri. - Del.): Documents for availing credit - Validity of - Computer generated copy of invoice containing name of appellant as hand written - Invoice containing all details viz. description of goods, assessable value, name and address of factory/warehouse etc. - C.B.E.C. Circular No. 441/7/99-C.X. dated 23-2-1999 stating that in such a case if assessee files declaration as contemplated under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, credit is permissible - Since procedural lapse is not a grave mistake and in the light of Board s circular, credit admissible - Rule 9 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. On perusal of above decisions, it is clear that there is no consensus among judiciary as to availment of credit based on computer generated invoice. As per settled principle of law,

substantive benefit cannot be denied on account of procedural lapses.non-signing of invoice may, at the most, be considered as procedural lapse which in view of paper writermust not deny availment of credit which is otherwise eligible. Amendment vide Finance Act 2015-16 Notification No. 5/2015-ST dated 1.3.2015 has been issued providing for the following: Authentication by digital signature (Rule 4C of Service Tax Rules): Any invoice, bill or challan issued under rule 4A or consignment note issued under rule 4B may be authenticated by means of a digital signature. Preservation of records authenticated by digital signature (Rule 5(4) of Service Tax Rules): Records under this rule may be preserved in electronic form and every page of the record so preserved shall be authenticated by means of a digital signature. Further, it has been provided that Board may, by notification, specify the conditions, safeguards and procedure to be followed by an assessee issuing digitally signed invoice and/or preserving digitally signed records. Notification No.18/2015-Central Excise (N.T.) dated 6 th July 2015 has been issued in this regard. Salient features/requirements of Notification: Following are main conditions which are required to be fulfilled by service provider intending to issue digitally signed invoices/preservation of records in electronic forms o Class 2 or Class 3 Digital Signature Certificate duly issued by the Certifying Authority in India to be used. o Intimate following details to jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner (AC/DC) at least fifteen days in advance: name, e-mail id, office address and designation of the person authorised to use the digital signature certificate; name of the Certifying Authority; date of issue of digital certificate and validity of the digital signature with a copy of the certificate issued by the Certifying Authority along with the complete address of the said Authority: o Every change to be intimated within 15 days of such change o Assessee already using digital signature shall intimate to the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner or Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise the above details within fifteen days of issue of this notification o Assessee who has more than one factory or service tax registration shall maintain

separate electronic records for each factory or each service tax registration o Records/invoice maintained and verified by means of digital signatures need to be provided to central excise officer through mail or any other storage device on being demanded o Central Excise officer may ask for printouts of invoices and electronic records during an enquiry, investigation or audit and if so asked, the assessee would be required to furnish the same. o The records shall be preserved for a period of five years. Conclusion: After issuance of notification, the earlier problem being faced by the trade and industry regarding availment of credit on computerized invoice is expected to come to an end. However, it is also important that now onwards issuance of computer generated invoice marking as this is computer generated invoice and does not require signature or invoice with the image of signatures or any other similar terms may no longer be valid for availment of credit. If one wants to issue computerized invoice, either this needs to be digitally signed or signed manually on printed copy. Every person availing credit is required to keep their vendor informed for such requirement so that their credit availment is not questioned by department.