Disruption in Higher Education: What Does It Mean For Credit Ratings

Similar documents
State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

Regional Economic Outlook

Policy on Conflict of Interest Certification

Ag Lending Experience of Living Through the Cycles

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Mongolian Banking System

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

Policy for Analyst Rotation

Policy for Record Retention for Rating Services

Challenging Issues and Alternative Approaches to CRE Credit Risk Modeling. RPC Conference, Scottsdale

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Volusia County School District (FL)

Grinnell College, IA

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Baa3 senior unsecured debt ratings of ICICI Bank's Bahrain branch Global Credit Research - 17 Aug 2017

US Local Government GO Debt Methodology

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

The Early Warning Toolkit in practice: Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Special Tax: Transportation-Related

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Counterparty Risk Ratings to three Sri Lankan banks 18 Jun 2018

Findlay City School District, OH

Estatus del Mercado de Emisiones de Financiamiento de Proyectos e Infraestructura

Siauliu Bankas, AB. Siauliu Bankas capital metrics will strengthen with EBRD s debt-to-equity conversion. ISSUER COMMENT 13 August 2018

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

FORO CORFICOLOMBIANA COLOMBIA Perspectiva Económica y Crediticia

Policy for Withdrawal of Credit Ratings

Webinar Navigating Choppy Markets: Safety-First Equity Strategies Based on Credit Risk Signals

The Early Warning Toolkit in Practice: Carillion PLC

Good (But Risky) Times

Rating Action: Moody's announces rating actions on student loan ABS backed by FFELP student loans following the update of its rating methodology

Feeling Good (For Now)

ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Q1 2018: Higher impairment offset revenue growth. ISSUER COMMENT 16 May Summary opinion

Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit, PA

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Request for Proposal: Moody s Signature Initiative. Corporate Social Responsibility

Underwriting standards for credit cards and auto loans tighten modestly, a positive

ISSUER COMMENT 02 DECEMBER 2014

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades PGW (PA) to A3 from Baa1; Assigns A3 to $278.2 mil Gas Works Rev. Refunding Bds., 15th Series

Columbia School District, MO

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aaa IFS rating of New York Life; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 27 Jul 2017

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

Introducing The Deterioration Probability Metric. A New Metric for Downgrade Risk

Duquesne University, PA

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

For personal use only

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Weber School District, UT

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A3 issuer rating to Nidec Corporation; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 31 Jan 2018

Session 4: Technical-legal panel: elements for an integrated covered bond framework

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

Global Credit Research - 19 Apr 2018

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to Wayne County Airport Auth. (MI) Series 2017 E senior lien revenue bonds

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Kommunalkredit Austria AG's public-sector covered bonds Global Credit Research - 25 Jul 2017

Bothell (City of) WA

Massachusetts (Commonwealth of)

Credit Trends: Kenyan Banks

Concord Hospital, NH

Commercial & Ag Lending Conference 2017

Metropolitan Opera Association, NY

New Issue: Moody's upgrades Edgewater, NJ's GO to Aa2: assigns MIG 1 to $15.4M in BANs

2019 US Higher Education Outlook

Findlay City School District, OH

Rating Action: Moody's reviews NORD/LB Luxembourg S.A. - Public-Sector Covered Bonds, direction uncertain 19 Dec 2018

PT Indosat Tbk. Strong Revenue and Earnings Growth in FY2015 Supports Credit Profile. ISSUER COMMENT 28 March 2016

Dallas County Community College District, TX

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Caa3 Issuer Rating to US Virgin Islands; lowers ratings on four liens of Matching Fund Revenue Bonds

Lubbock (City of), TX

Commercial & Ag Lending Conference 2017

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Bharti's senior unsecured notes to Ba1 and assigns a Ba1 CFR; outlook negative 05 Feb 2019

Huffman Independent School District, TX

CCAR 2019: A Very Tough Test

Challenges in CECL Implementation. Robby Holditch, Director, Solutions Specialist July 2018

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Edison (Township of) NJ

Rating Action: Moody's reviews Depfa ACS Bank's public sector covered bonds for downgrade Global Credit Research - 14 Sep 2016

A New Way to Look at Covenant Lite Collateral in CLOs

CECL: What s on Tap for the Future of Credit Loss Accounting?

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Yanlord to Ba2; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 25 Apr 2017

The Impact of Hurricane Harvey on the U.S. Economy. Presentation Title, Date 1

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Intrum Justitia's Ba2 corporate family rating; outlook changed to stable Global Credit Research - 19 Apr 2018

Township of Nutley, NJ

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to San Francisco Airport Commission, CA Series 2018B-G; outlook is stable 01 May 2018

Federal Home Loan Banks

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades mortgage covered bonds issued by AIB Mortgage Bank and EBS Mortgage Finance Global Credit Research - 29 Nov 2016

City of Mesquite, TX

Rating Action: Moody's affirms JAB Holding's Baa1 Issuer rating; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 30 Jan 2018

Transcription:

Disruption in Higher Education: What Does It Mean For Credit Ratings Wednesday, January 31, 2018 Susan Fitzgerald, Moody s Jessica Matsumori, S&P Global Ratings Mary Peloquin-Dodd, NC State University

Rating Agency Outlooks

Moody s 2018 higher education outlook changed to negative Constrained growth in multiple revenue streams A growing proportion of the sector will have under 3% aggregate revenue growth Rising expense pressures in a highly competitive environment Uncertainty around direction of multiple federal policies

Revenue growth under 3% excluding patient care Aggregate revenue growth Aggregate revenue growth without patient care Aggregate expense growth Aggregate expense growth without patient care 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Est. 2018 For. 2019 For. Source: Moody's Investors Service

Expected growth rates vary by revenue stream Source of Revenue FY 2018 and 2019 Forecast Growth Assumptions (%) % of Aggregate Private University Revenue Median Private University Revenue (%) % of Aggregate Public University Revenue Median Public University Revenue (%) Net tuition and auxiliaries 2-3.5 35 74 33 50 State appropriations 2-2.5 0 0 19 24 Patient care 5-7 27 0 19 0 Grants and contracts 1-2 14 2 16 10 Endowment income 2-5 13 9 4 2 Gifts for operations 6-6.5 3 6 3 2 Other revenue 6-6.5 8 3 6 4 Total 100 100 Source: Moody s Investors Service Median data is the median for each revenue stream and will not add up to 100%. Median data may be 0 in some cases, meaning that the median data point indicated no revenue from that particular revenue source. Aggregate data is driven by the largest universities in the portfolio, whereas median data adjusts for the diversity across the sector.

Clouds over the higher education sector contribute to potential volatility Potential changes to federal financial aid and loan programs Potentially rising borrowing costs Medicare & Medicaid changes Rising inflation and labor costs Increasing pension liabilities Stagnant R&D funding Tax reform

2017 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such

S&P Global Ratings: US Higher Education Outlook: Negative Risks Multiple implications from the recently enacted Tax Cut and Jobs Act Decrease in capital markets activity due to rising interest rates and curtailment of advance refundings Widening gap between students' expectations and their willingness to pay

S&P Global Ratings: US Higher Education Outlook: Negative Opportunities Increase and emergence of innovative strategies and partnerships Change in institutions' view of ideal target student profile

S&P s Higher Education Ratings Universe Americas: Approximately 436 US public and private universities 8 Canadian universities 3 Mexican universities Europe: 4 UK public universities Australia: 4 public universities S&P rates 465 universities globally

S&P Global Ratings Higher Education Team Ratings Distribution by Category Source: U.S. Public College And University Fiscal 2016 Median Ratios and U.S. Not-For-Profit Private Universities' Fiscal 2016 Median Ratios, published July 11, 2016

Topics in Disruption P3 Financings Impact on Credit Ratings Privatization of Other Campus Services Credit Impact of Growing Academic Medical Centers Recent Rating Changes Expected Changes in Healthcare Finance Impending Accounting Changes FASB Display Changes Unfunded OPEB Liabilities

Topics in Disruption Changes in Educational Delivery Partnerships with For-Profit Corporations Online Delivery of Higher Education Deferred Maintenance Funding Financing Mechanisms Credit Implications of a Growing Liability Financial Innovation Adaptive Institutions and Strategies Employed Changes in Financial Performance

Questions?