American University, DC

Similar documents
Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit, PA

Duquesne University, PA

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, IL

Grinnell College, IA

Volusia County School District (FL)

Vanderbilt University, TN

YMCA of Greater New York, NY

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Columbia School District, MO

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

Rollins College, FL. New Issue - Moody's Assigns A2 to Rollins College's (FL) Series 2016A; Outlook Stable. CREDIT OPINION 24 May 2016.

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

The College of New Jersey, NJ

Concord Hospital, NH

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

New Issue: Moody's assigns A3 to Xavier University, OH's $47.5M Ser. 2015C; outlook stable

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

Jersey City Community Charter School, NJ

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

Metropolitan Opera Association, NY

Westport (Town of) CT

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Butler (Village of), WI

Prince William County, VA

Newport News, VA. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Strong financial management. Credit Challenges. Below average demographics

Huffman Independent School District, TX

Dallas County Community College District, TX

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

Allen Independent School District, TX

Prince William County, VA

Disruption in Higher Education: What Does It Mean For Credit Ratings

Celina Independent School District, TX

Taos Municipal School District 1, NM

Lubbock (City of), TX

Massachusetts (Commonwealth of)

City of Oak Creek, WI

Newport News (City of) VA

City of Las Cruces, NM

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Wicomico County, MD. Credit Strengths. » Well-funded pension plan. Credit Challenges. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Weber School District, UT

Bothell (City of) WA

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Mongolian Banking System

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Edison (Township of) NJ

Federal Home Loan Banks

Park District of La Grange, IL

Findlay City School District, OH

Montgomery County, TX

Columbia University, NY

Rating Action: Moody's assigns (P)Ba2 ratings to Intrum Justitia AB; outlook positive Global Credit Research - 12 Jun 2017

George W. Kuhn Drainage District (Oakland County), MI

Rio Rancho, NM. Credit Strengths. Sizeable and stable tax base. Healthy reserves. Manageable debt burden with rapid payout.

WILTON (TOWN OF) CT. Update to credit analysis. Credit strengths. » Affluent residential tax base. Credit challenges

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

Bexar County, TX. Exhibit 1 Assessed Valuation Gains Reflect Continued Economic Activity CLIENT SERVICES. Source: Bexar County, TX,

Carroll (County of) MD

City of Mesquite, TX

Montgomery County, TX

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Ag Lending Experience of Living Through the Cycles

Bernalillo Municipal School District 1 (Sandoval County), NM

West Fargo Public School District No. 6, ND

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Bharti's senior unsecured notes to Ba1 and assigns a Ba1 CFR; outlook negative 05 Feb 2019

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Kommunalkredit Austria AG's public-sector covered bonds Global Credit Research - 25 Jul 2017

ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Q1 2018: Higher impairment offset revenue growth. ISSUER COMMENT 16 May Summary opinion

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Counterparty Risk Ratings to three Sri Lankan banks 18 Jun 2018

Underwriting standards for credit cards and auto loans tighten modestly, a positive

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

Cocoa (City of) FL. Update to credit analysis following assignment of Aa2 issuer rating. CREDIT OPINION 12 April Summary.

Regional Economic Outlook

3i Group plc. Update following the publication of first-half 2018 financial results. CREDIT OPINION 28 November Update

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Baa3 senior unsecured debt ratings of ICICI Bank's Bahrain branch Global Credit Research - 17 Aug 2017

Policy on Conflict of Interest Certification

Rating Action: Moody's reviews Depfa ACS Bank's public sector covered bonds for downgrade Global Credit Research - 14 Sep 2016

Rating Action: Moody's reviews NORD/LB Luxembourg S.A. - Public-Sector Covered Bonds, direction uncertain 19 Dec 2018

Rating Action: Moody's affirms JAB Holding's Baa1 Issuer rating; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 30 Jan 2018

Metropolitan Water District of So. California

New Issue: Moody's upgrades Edgewater, NJ's GO to Aa2: assigns MIG 1 to $15.4M in BANs

Evanston (City of), IL

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Intrum Justitia's Ba2 corporate family rating; outlook changed to stable Global Credit Research - 19 Apr 2018

blend Funding plc Update to credit analysis Credit strengths » Liquidity reserve as structural enhancement Credit challenges

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Coty's CFR to Ba3; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 20 Mar 2018

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Yanlord to Ba2; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 25 Apr 2017

PSP Capital Inc. Update to credit analysis. CREDIT OPINION 27 August Update

PT Indosat Tbk. Strong Revenue and Earnings Growth in FY2015 Supports Credit Profile. ISSUER COMMENT 28 March 2016

Policy for Analyst Rotation

Transcription:

CREDIT OPINION American University, DC New Issue - Moody's assigns A1 to American University, DC's series 2017; outlook stable New Issue Summary Rating Rationale Moody's Investors Service has assigned an A1 rating to American University, DC's proposed $102 million taxable bonds, series 2017 bonds. The proposed bonds will be issued as fixed rate debt with a final maturity in 2047. We maintain A1 ratings on $347 million of outstanding debt. The outlook is stable. Analyst Contacts Susan E Shaffer VP-Senior Analyst susan.shaffer@moodys.com 212-553-4132 Kendra M. Smith 212-553-4807 MD-Public Finance kendra.smith@moodys.com Diane F. Viacava 212-553-4734 VP-Sr Credit Officer diane.viacava@moodys.com American University's A1 rating reflects the university's market position as an established research university in an urban location with ongoing robust student demand, consistent revenue growth and exemplary operating performance. Thoughtful strategic and financial planning, in conjunction with strong liquidity, help to offset the impact of the university's large capital program and resulting elevated financial leverage. Other offsetting factors include a high reliance on student charges and a relatively aggressive debt structure. Exhibit 1 Increased competitiveness underscores ongoing strengthening of0 market profile Primary Selectivity 2013 Primary Matriculation 2014 50% 45% CLIENT SERVICES 40% Americas 1-212-553-1653 35% Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 25% Japan 81-3-5408-4100 15% EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 5% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Data for first time in college students in fall semester of indicated year Source: Moody's Investors Service Credit Strengths Continued strengthening of market profile and student demand, evidenced by increased competitiveness in selectivity and matriculation Consistently strong operating results and excellent cash flow Solid financial flexibility enhanced by high proportion of flexible reserves, with excellent liquidity for the rating category Careful planning and monitoring of strategic, operational, and capital initiatives

Credit Challenges Elevated financial leverage supporting large capital program Relatively aggressive debt structure, with demand debt comprising almost half of pro forma debt as well as bullet maturities Limited revenue diversity and lower philanthropic support relative to reputational peers Rating Outlook The stable outlook reflects expectations of continued strong student demand, maintenance of flexible reserves and ongoing healthy operating performance. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade Exceptional growth in financial resources Increased philanthropic support Enhanced revenue diversification Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade Softening of student demand Decline in operating performance leading to material reduction in flexible reserves Significant additional borrowing beyond current plans Key Indicators Exhibit 2 Median: A Rated Private Universities Pro forma 2013 2014 2015 2016 11,781 12,035 12,112 12,260 12,541 4,526 520,824 540,598 557,352 576,474 596,956 196,259 3.4 3.8 3.1 3.4 3.6 3.4 Total Cash & Investments ($000) 807,231 886,463 952,937 889,493 951,586 359,875 Total Debt ($000) Total FTE Enrollment Operating Revenue ($000) Annual Change in Operating Revenue (%) 383,930 418,676 481,905 481,620 561,375 132,260 Spendable Cash & Investments to Total Debt (x) 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.5 Spendable Cash & Investments to Operating Expenses (x) 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.3 Monthly Days Cash on Hand (x) 576 627 651 547 552 321 Operating Cash Flow Margin (%) 18.8 20.4 20.4 21.7 20.5 15.3 Total Debt to Cash Flow (x) 3.9 3.8 4.2 3.8 4.6 4.6 Annual Debt Service Coverage (x) 6.6 7.7 7.3 6.2 6.1 3.0 Pro forma column includes preliminary fiscal 2017 results and $80 million in new series 2017 bonds. Source: Moody's Investors Service This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2

Recent Developments As anticipated, American is issuing $80 million in new debt consistent with its capital plan. The proceeds will be used to fund renovations to several existing buildings. Current funding plans for American's science center include philanthropy and university funds rather than debt, as previously considered. Detailed Credit Considerations Market Profile: Robust student demand demonstrated by increased competitiveness American's market position will continue to strengthen, bolstered by its desirable urban location in a residential area of Washington, DC, capital investment including new residence halls and law school facilities, and brand enhancement. Recent improvements in selectively and matriculation have been particulary strong, with selectivity decreasing to 29% for fall 2017 from 44% in fall 2012 and matriculation growing to 33% from 21% over the same period. Favorably, American achieved these gains without a material increase in its tuition discount rate, which is a low 25% compared to 35% median for A-rated peers. Growth in undergraduate enrollment will moderate after a 31% increase since 2007 (preliminary 7,981 undergrad FTEs for fall 2017), due in part to the District of Columbia's requirement that American house two-thirds of its undergraduates. While law school enrollment has softened, overall graduate student enrollment remains steady. Management will continue to demonstrate the ability to adjust expenses to enrollment shifts and to grow net tuition revenue while increasing affordability. Operating Performance: Exemplary operating performance and exceptional cash flow will continue American will continue to demonstrate sound planning and careful monitoring of strategic, operational and capital initiatives, resulting in ongoing excellent operating performance. Operating cash flow was an exceptional 21% for fiscal 2017 based on preliminary results (April 30 fiscal year end). As in past years, the university's two-year budgeting model for fiscal 2018 through fiscal 2019 includes financial safeguards totaling an estimated 6% of the operating budget. Best practices include budgeting for various contingencies, contributions to the quasi-endowment and investment in staff, facilities and technology. Limited revenue diversity, with 80% of revenue derived from student charges, underscores the need for continued effective enrollment management. Increased revenue diversity, particularly from fundraising, would be credit positive. Wealth and Liquidity: Ongoing surpluses contribute to very favorable unrestricted financial resources and liquidity American will continue to benefit from a high proportion of flexible financial resources built largely through years of consistent operating surpluses and a commitment to limit illiquid investments. Spendable cash and investments comprise a very strong 88% of American's $952 million in total cash and investments for fiscal 2017. However, overall growth in financial resources has been slightly lower than peers due in large part to American's 10-year capital investment program, now nearing completion. Over the past five years, American has invested approximately $375 million in its physical plant. The $622 million endowment, of which $430 million was unrestricted as of fiscal 2017, showed an annual return over almost 14% through June 2017. Funds have an equity bias, with over one half of funds allocated to global equities. Cambridge Associates serves as investment advisor. While gift revenue continues to grow, at $46 million for fiscal 2017, gifts per student lag peers. American raised a three-year average of $2,664 per student compared to a median of approximately $7,800 for A1-rated peers. The university will benefit from an upcoming campaign currently in the planning phase and expected to begin fall 2018. In fiscal 2017, the university received an $18.7 million property gift consisting of 367 acres in the foothills of northern Virginia as well as guest rooms, cottages and meeting space. LIQUIDITY Liquidity remains extremely strong for the rating category despite a modest reduction due to construction spending in fiscal 2017. Monthly liquidity of $748 million provides an exceptional 552 days cash on hand relative to a 2016 median of 321 days for A-rated peers. Liquidity will remain at least stable. 3

Leverage: Moderately high financial leverage to support capital plan and relatively complex debt structure Investment in a large 10-year capital improvement plan, which will culminate with the planned construction of a science center beginning in 2018, has resulted in moderately high financial leverage, which anchors the university at the A1 rating. Spendable cash and investment covers pro forma debt by 1.5 times, lower than a 2.7 times A1 peer median for fiscal 2016. High leverage is mitigated by strong operating cash flow; pro forma debt to cash flow is in line with peers at 4.6 times. With excellent cash flow expected to continue, American is able to absorb this incremental debt at the current rating level. DEBT STRUCTURE American's debt structure is relatively aggressive, with demand debt comprising 45% of the $561 million total debt portfolio, which is almost entirely structured as bullet maturities. Tender features on $100 million of variable rate debt are supported by a letter of credit with Royal Bank of Canada, expiring in December 2017. An additional $119 million is in bank purchase mode with two banks; agreements expire in February 2018 and February 2020. The university continues to consider options for refinancing and replacement of expiring agreements. Management continues to demonstrate the ability to manage the portfolio's complexities effectively. Bank agreements are subject to leverage ratio and debt service coverage ratio covenants. The university has ample headroom under both ratio covenants for fiscal 2017 (leverage ratio of times compared to a 0.85 requirement; debt service coverage ratio of 5.7 times compared to a times requirement). DEBT-RELATED DERIVATIVES American has five swaps with two counterparties for a total notional amount of $195 million. As of September 1, 2017, the swaps were a $81 million liability to the university and required $33 million of collateral to be posted. While the swaps add risk to the university's debt structure, American's significant liquidity mitigates the risk of collateral posting or termination payments. PENSIONS AND OPEB The university has a $20 million OPEB liability that is funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. Total OPEB costs and contributions to American's two defined contribution plans were a manageable 3% of expenses for fiscal 2017. Governance and Management: Strong management exhibits careful planning and management With a strong management team in place, continued healthy operating performance in a highly competitive higher education environment will continue. The university's board of trustees and senior leadership emphasize transparency and close fiscal oversight, yielding consistently positive results and a heightened market profile. A new president joined the university in June 2017. Legal Security The bonds are a general obligation of the university. Use of Proceeds Proceeds will be used to finance or refinance the costs of various capital projects of the university and to pay certain costs of issuance. Obligor Profile American University is a private non-sectarian research institution situated in a residential area of northwest Washington, DC. The university enrolled over 12,500 students in fall 2017 across a comprehensive array of undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs including law, business, public affairs and international service. Methodology The principal methodology used in this rating was Global Higher Education published in November 2015. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. 4

Ratings Exhibit 3 American University, DC Issue Taxable Bonds, Series 2017 Rating Type Sale Amount Expected Sale Date Rating Description Rating A1 Underlying LT $102,000,000 10/11/2017 Revenue: 501c3 Unsecured General Obligation Source: Moody's Investors Service 5

2017 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 6 1093087

CLIENT SERVICES 7 Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454