Massachusetts (Commonwealth of)

Similar documents
Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

Special Tax: Transportation-Related

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Volusia County School District (FL)

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Jersey City Community Charter School, NJ

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

Findlay City School District, OH

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

Columbia School District, MO

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Westport (Town of) CT

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Lubbock (City of), TX

ISSUER COMMENT 02 DECEMBER 2014

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

City of Las Cruces, NM

WILTON (TOWN OF) CT. Update to credit analysis. Credit strengths. » Affluent residential tax base. Credit challenges

Weber School District, UT

City of Oak Creek, WI

Newport News (City of) VA

West Fargo Public School District No. 6, ND

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Butler (Village of), WI

Park District of La Grange, IL

Mongolian Banking System

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

Newport News, VA. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Strong financial management. Credit Challenges. Below average demographics

American Samoa (Territory of)

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to Wayne County Airport Auth. (MI) Series 2017 E senior lien revenue bonds

St. Mary's County, MD

Disruption in Higher Education: What Does It Mean For Credit Ratings

Cuyahoga County, OH. New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aa2 to Cuyahoga County, OH's Sales Tax Revenue Bonds. CREDIT OPINION 25 September 2017.

City of Mesquite, TX

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Celina Independent School District, TX

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, IL

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Concord Hospital, NH

Regional Economic Outlook

Huffman Independent School District, TX

Siauliu Bankas, AB. Siauliu Bankas capital metrics will strengthen with EBRD s debt-to-equity conversion. ISSUER COMMENT 13 August 2018

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to San Francisco Airport Commission, CA Series 2018B-G; outlook is stable 01 May 2018

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades PGW (PA) to A3 from Baa1; Assigns A3 to $278.2 mil Gas Works Rev. Refunding Bds., 15th Series

Rating Action: Moody's announces rating actions on student loan ABS backed by FFELP student loans following the update of its rating methodology

George W. Kuhn Drainage District (Oakland County), MI

Edison (Township of) NJ

Carroll (County of) MD

Rio Rancho, NM. Credit Strengths. Sizeable and stable tax base. Healthy reserves. Manageable debt burden with rapid payout.

blend Funding plc Update to credit analysis Credit strengths » Liquidity reserve as structural enhancement Credit challenges

Bothell (City of) WA

Montgomery County, TX

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aaa IFS rating of New York Life; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 27 Jul 2017

Montgomery County, TX

New Issue: Moody's upgrades Edgewater, NJ's GO to Aa2: assigns MIG 1 to $15.4M in BANs

Dallas County Community College District, TX

Celina Independent School District, TX

US Local Government GO Debt Methodology

ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Q1 2018: Higher impairment offset revenue growth. ISSUER COMMENT 16 May Summary opinion

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Counterparty Risk Ratings to three Sri Lankan banks 18 Jun 2018

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Intrum Justitia's Ba2 corporate family rating; outlook changed to stable Global Credit Research - 19 Apr 2018

Bexar County, TX. Exhibit 1 Assessed Valuation Gains Reflect Continued Economic Activity CLIENT SERVICES. Source: Bexar County, TX,

Underwriting standards for credit cards and auto loans tighten modestly, a positive

Prince William County, VA

PSP Capital Inc. Update to credit analysis. CREDIT OPINION 27 August Update

Federal Home Loan Banks

City of Oakland, CA. Update to Credit Analysis. CREDIT OPINION 19 April Summary

Duquesne University, PA

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Bharti's senior unsecured notes to Ba1 and assigns a Ba1 CFR; outlook negative 05 Feb 2019

Taos Municipal School District 1, NM

Policy on Conflict of Interest Certification

Global Credit Research - 19 Apr 2018

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Caa3 Issuer Rating to US Virgin Islands; lowers ratings on four liens of Matching Fund Revenue Bonds

Metropolitan Opera Association, NY

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Framingham, MA's $43.9M GO bonds, MIG 1 to $4.4M GO BANs

Findlay City School District, OH

Prince William County, VA

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A3 issuer rating to Nidec Corporation; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 31 Jan 2018

PT Indosat Tbk. Strong Revenue and Earnings Growth in FY2015 Supports Credit Profile. ISSUER COMMENT 28 March 2016

Policy for Analyst Rotation

Allen Independent School District, TX

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

Wicomico County, MD. Credit Strengths. » Well-funded pension plan. Credit Challenges. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Transcription:

CREDIT OPINION Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) New Issue - Moody's assigns Aa2 to Massachusetts' $143M GANs, 2017 Ser. A; outlook stable New Issue Summary Rating Rationale Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aa2 rating to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts $143 million Federal Highway Grant Anticipation Notes (GANs) (Accelerated Bridge Program) 2017 Series A. The bonds are expected to sell on November 1. Contacts Genevieve Nolan +1.212.553.3912 VP-Senior Analyst genevieve.nolan@moodys.com Timothy Blake +1.212.553.4524 MD-Public Finance timothy.blake@moodys.com Dan Seymour, CFA +1.212.553.4871 VP-Senior Analyst dan.seymour@moodys.com The Aa2 rating reflects the subordinate pledge on Commonwealth Transportation Fund (CTF) revenues after debt service is paid on outstanding CTF bonds, which are currently rated Aa1. The ratings also reflects the strong coverage provided by a senior lien on federal highway reimbursements, balanced by the periodic reauthorization risk of the revenue stream from the federal government. Creditors benefit from strong legal protections as well, including an advance set-aside of federal revenues for debt service, a two-pronged additional bonds test that limits the issuance of parity GANs and debt service payments that do not require appropriation from the state. Exhibit 1 Net CTF revenues and federal highway funds provide healthy MADS coverage Total Debt Outstanding (Mil.) CLIENT SERVICES Pledged Revenue (Mil.) Coverage of Maximum Annual Debt Service (x) 120 $2,000 $1,800 Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan EMEA 100 $1,600 $1,400 80 $1,200 60 $1,000 81-3-5408-4100 $800 44-20-7772-5454 $400 40 $600 20 $200 $0 0 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Source: Commonwealth of Massachusetts; Moody's Investors Service Credit Strengths» Strong coverage provided by a pledge of Massachusetts' federal highway reimbursements» Additional coverage provided by a pledge of CTF funds after payment of senior CTF bonds Credit Challenges» No limit on additional subordinated bonds in the CTF indenture, although additional debt is limited by additional bonds tests of 2.5 times on CTF revenues and 1.5x on federal reimbursements in the ABP GANs indenture

» Periodic reauthorization risk inherent in the federal program and uncertainty about the form of future federal highway aid programs Rating Outlook The outlook is stable, reflecting the expected levels of federal reimbursements through 2020 as well as the continued steady growth of CTF revenues that will be available in the event of disruption to federal funds. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade» An upgrade to the CTF rating» Changes in legal structure such as stronger limitations on CTF leverage at the senior and subordinate level Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade» A downgrade to the CTF rating» A significant decline in federal reimbursements or obligation authority, or overall changes in the federal highway aid program that materially impact the funds that flow to Massachusetts» Large leverage of the CTF or material weakening in the CTF revenues that reduce backup coverage Key Indicators Exhibit 2 Massachusetts Federal Grant Anticipation Notes FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Coverage of Maximum Annual Debt Service (x) Total Debt Outstanding (Mil.) Pledged Revenue (Mil.) Pledged Revenue Annual Change Additional Bonds Test (x) 104.3x $610 $1,605-8.5% 104.3x $449 $1,662 3.6% 38.0x $531 $1,763 6.1% 21.5x $700 $1,796 1.9% 18.4x $657 $1,829 1.9% Source: Commonwealth of Massachusetts; Moody's Investors Service Recent Developments Recent developments are incorporated in the Detailed Rating Considerations. Detailed Rating Considerations Tax Base and Nature of Pledge The GANs benefit from two sources of pledged revenues: first, all federal highway construction reimbursements and second, net CTF pledged revenues after the payment of debt service on the CTF bonds. Federal revenues flow from the Federal-Aid Highway Program, established in 1956 and are primarily comprised of federal fuel taxes. Distribution of these funds requires periodic reauthorization and appropriation from Congress, which was most recently granted in December 2015 and running through September 30, 2020. The commonwealth expects to receive approximately $600 million annually. CTF pledged revenues are comprised of a variety of state fuel taxes and motor vehicle registry fees. For a more detailed discussion on the CTF revenues, please refer to our most recent rating report, dated October 20, 2017. Debt Service Coverage and Revenue Metrics Post sale, MADS coverage is projected at 5.5 times based solely on federal funds. MADS is projected to occur in fiscal 2021, one year after expiration of the current federal highway funding program. Inclusive of both federal funds and expected net CTF funds, MADS This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2

grows to a significant 16.2 times. Incorporating the additional GAN debt currently contemplated by the commonwealth, MADS coverage falls slightly to 5.3 times projected federal revenues and 15.1 times across both federal and net CTF revenues. Debt and Legal Covenants GANs are subject to a two pronged leverage constraint, requiring 1.5 times coverage of MADs by federal reimbursements for both the senior and subordinate GANs, and 2.5 times coverage by excess CTF revenues. DEBT STRUCTURE The commonwealth currently has $940 million in outstanding federal Grant Anticipation Notes, with proceeds funding the Rail Enhancement Program (REP) and Accelerated Bridge Program (ABP). The commonwealth expects to issue another $30 million in GANs through 2021. DEBT-RELATED DERIVATIVES All of the commonwealth s GAN debt is fixed rate and it does not have any derivative products outstanding. PENSIONS AND OPEB Based on the commonwealth's fiscal 2016 pension data, we have calculated that its adjusted net pension liability (ANPL) was $65.2 billion, or 201.5% of revenues. The 50-state median ANPL to revenues is 82.2%, and Massachusetts ranks sixth-highest in this ratio. Massachusetts is among the handful of states that take responsibility for directly funding teacher pensions. Moody's ANPL reflects certain adjustments made to improve comparability of reported pension liabilities. The commonwealth's other post-employment benefits (OPEB) accrued liability, assuming no pre-funding and a discount rate of 4.5%, was approximately $16.3 billion as of January 1, 2016. The liability falls to $10.2 billion assuming pre-funding and a discount rate of 7.75%. Massachusetts dedicates future tobacco settlement monies to its OPEB trust fund, phased-in starting in fiscal 2013. The commonwealth contributes more than the full amount of its actuarially determined pension contribution, about $1.9 billion in fiscal 2016. However, the state's contributions were 65.7% of our tread water benchmark, which is the payment covering the year's newly accrued service costs and interest on the NPL. The state's combined debt service, pension and OPEB contributions in fiscal 2016 were 20.0% of own-source governmental revenues, increasing to 23.1% if the state made it's tread water contribution. The high fixed costs are partly attributable to the Commonwealth's absorption of certain costs covered by local governments in most other states. For a more detailed discussion on Massachusetts' pension and OPEB liabilities, please refer to our most recent rating report for the Commonwealth. Governance The federal highway revenues that are pledged to the GANs are not subject to annual state appropriation for debt service payments and the federal revenues are deposited with the trustee one year in advance, insulating the credit somewhat from the state governance practices. However, we note the subordinate pledge on the CTF revenues, and that in the event of a lack of authorization for the federal revenues, the GANs would also be subject to the same governance ties as the CTF bonds given the subordinate pledge on the CTF revenues. For more discussion on the CTF governance ties to the commonwealth, please see our most recent CTF report dated October 20, 2017. Legal Security The GANs are secured by a senior lien on federal reimbursements with a secondary pledge on net CTF funds. If federal reimbursements are not expected to provide 1.5 times coverage of debt service, the governor is required to request an appropriation from excess CTF funds to cure the deficiency. If no appropriation is made by the legislature, the trustee is prohibited from releasing CTF funds to the commonwealth for operations. As long as projected federal reimbursements meet the 1.5 times test, the indenture also requires that funds sufficient for the succeeding year's debt service be set-aside by the trustee one year in advance of each of the December 15 and June 15 debt service payment dates. 3

Use of Proceeds The Federal Highway GANs are being issued as part of the commonwealth's Accelerated Bridge Program, with proceeds being used to finance bridge repair and construction in the commonwealth. The proceeds will also be used to advance refund certain outstanding maturities of the Series 2013 A GANs for expected net present value savings. Obligor Profile The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has an estimated 2016 population of 6.8 million people and a gross state product of approximately $507.9 billion. The state is economically well diversified and has very high wealth levels. Methodology The principal methodology used in this rating was US Public Finance Special Tax Methodology published in July 2017. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. Ratings Exhibit 3 Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) Issue Federal Highway Grant Anticipation Notes (Accelerated Bridge Program) 2017 Series A Rating Type Sale Amount Expected Sale Date Rating Description Rating Aa2 Underlying LT $142,640,000 11/01/2017 Special Tax: Transportation-Related Source: Moody's Investors Service 4

2017 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 5 1095500

CLIENT SERVICES 6 Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454