Rating Update: Moody's affirms Aa3 on Waukegan Park District, IL's GO debt

Similar documents
Park District of La Grange, IL

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Framingham, MA's $43.9M GO bonds, MIG 1 to $4.4M GO BANs

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

New Issue: Moody's upgrades Edgewater, NJ's GO to Aa2: assigns MIG 1 to $15.4M in BANs

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa to Bronxville NY's $5.2M GO Bonds

Lubbock (City of), TX

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Ford County USD No. 443's (KS) GOs Series 2015-A and Series 2015-B

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Columbia School District, MO

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Montgomery County, TX

City of Oak Creek, WI

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Huffman Independent School District, TX

Montgomery County, TX

City of Mesquite, TX

Dallas County Community College District, TX

Special Tax: Transportation-Related

Volusia County School District (FL)

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Weber School District, UT

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Celina Independent School District, TX

Westport (Town of) CT

Oakland (City of), CA

Ci1r of' SACRAMENTO. O ffice of t he City Treasu rer. Russell Fehr~ City Treasurer ADDITIONAL (VOLUNTARY) DISCLOSURE RATING AFFIRMED

Butler (Village of), WI

Socorro Independent School District, TX

West Fargo Public School District No. 6, ND

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

Moody s Upgrades Montco s Outlook

Newport News (City of) VA

Township of Nutley, NJ

Hoover (City of), AL

Findlay City School District, OH

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aaa IFS rating of New York Life; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 27 Jul 2017

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

George W. Kuhn Drainage District (Oakland County), MI

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

Evanston (City of), IL

Socorro Independent School District, TX

WILTON (TOWN OF) CT. Update to credit analysis. Credit strengths. » Affluent residential tax base. Credit challenges

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

New Issue: Moody's assigns an underlying Aa1 rating to Alpine School District, UT's G.O. bonds

Carroll (County of) MD

Global Credit Research - 06 Mar 2018

Newport News, VA. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Strong financial management. Credit Challenges. Below average demographics

Findlay City School District, OH

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

City of Oakland, CA. Update to Credit Analysis. CREDIT OPINION 19 April Summary

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

Wicomico County, MD. Credit Strengths. » Well-funded pension plan. Credit Challenges. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

St. Mary's County, MD

New Issue: Moody's revises Pittsburgh PA's outlook to positive; affirms A1

Bernalillo Municipal School District 1 (Sandoval County), NM

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to San Francisco Airport Commission, CA Series 2018B-G; outlook is stable 01 May 2018

Las Cruces School District 2, NM

Bothell (City of) WA

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

Cocoa (City of) FL. Update to credit analysis following assignment of Aa2 issuer rating. CREDIT OPINION 12 April Summary.

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Oak Creek, WI's $2.7M GO Bonds, Ser. 2014B

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

Taos Municipal School District 1, NM

Rio Rancho, NM. Credit Strengths. Sizeable and stable tax base. Healthy reserves. Manageable debt burden with rapid payout.

Bexar County, TX. Exhibit 1 Assessed Valuation Gains Reflect Continued Economic Activity CLIENT SERVICES. Source: Bexar County, TX,

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades PGW (PA) to A3 from Baa1; Assigns A3 to $278.2 mil Gas Works Rev. Refunding Bds., 15th Series

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Coty's CFR to Ba3; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 20 Mar 2018

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Baa3 senior unsecured debt ratings of ICICI Bank's Bahrain branch Global Credit Research - 17 Aug 2017

City of Las Cruces, NM

Prince William County, VA

Prince William County, VA

Edison (Township of) NJ

Duquesne University, PA

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa rating to the Village of Glenview's (IL) $18.6 million General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2012A

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Suriname's issuer rating to B2 negative; concluding rating review Global Credit Research - 20 Feb 2018

Rating Action: Moody's changes Nicaragua's rating outlook to stable from positive; B2 rating affirmed 13 Jun 2018

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Caa3 Issuer Rating to US Virgin Islands; lowers ratings on four liens of Matching Fund Revenue Bonds

Global Credit Research - 24 Feb 2012 ASSIGNS A2 RATING TO $24.6 MILLION G.O. BONDS, 2012 SERIES A & B

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Counterparty Risk Ratings to three Sri Lankan banks 18 Jun 2018

Rating Action: Moody's announces rating actions on student loan ABS backed by FFELP student loans following the update of its rating methodology

Evanston (City of) IL

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Allen Independent School District, TX

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to Wayne County Airport Auth. (MI) Series 2017 E senior lien revenue bonds

Rating Update: Moody's upgrades Central Falls' (RI) GO rating to Ba3 from B1; outlook is stable

Rating Action: Moody's reviews Depfa ACS Bank's public sector covered bonds for downgrade Global Credit Research - 14 Sep 2016

Transcription:

Rating Update: Moody's affirms Aa3 on Waukegan Park District, IL's GO debt Global Credit Research - 29 May 2015 Affects $8.5 million of rated debt WAUKEGAN PARK DISTRICT, IL Park/Recreation Districts IL NEW YORK, May 29, 2015 --Moody's Investors Service has affirmed Waukegan Park District's (IL) general obligation rating of Aa3. The Aa3 rating applies to $8.5 million of outstanding general obligation unlimited tax (GOULT) debt. SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE The Aa3 rating reflects the park district's ample reserves and stable financial operations, along with strong financial and capital planning practices. Additionally, the rating incorporates the district's rapidly declining tax base, reduced revenue raising flexibility due to property tax rate limitations, and a below average socioeconomic profile. OUTLOOK Outlooks are generally not applicable for local government credits of this size. WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO UP -A multi-year trend of growth in the tax base -Improved socioeconomic profile WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO DOWN -Further tax base erosion, putting downward pressure on property tax revenues -Declines in reserves STRENGTHS -Favorable location with access to employment centers in both Chicago (Ba1 negative) and Milwaukee (Aa3 stable) metropolitan areas -Ample reserves with stable financial operations -Strong management team with long-term fiscal and capital planning practices CHALLENGES -Tax base has declined in value by 41% since 2008 -Two primary operating property tax levies are at their rate caps -Below average socioeconomic profile characterized by high unemployment RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Recent developments incorporated into the Detailed Rating Rationale. DETAILED RATING RATIONALE ECONOMY AND TAX BASE: SIGNIFICANT TAX BASE DECLINES; WEAK SOCIOECONOMIC PROFILE

The park district's $2.9 billion tax base is expected to stabilize following a multi-year trend of significant declines. Located approximately 35 miles north of Chicago in Lake County (Aaa), the district is essentially coterminous with the City of Waukegan (A2). The district's tax base has experienced significant declines in recent years with full valuation declining 41% from its peak in 2008. Officials attribute the sizeable declines to housing depreciation, foreclosures, and tax appeals. Moving forward, officials expect trends to stabilize, citing preliminary data from the county which indicate a more moderate 4.0% decline will be recorded in the current year and a 4-6% increase in 2016. The tax base is predominantly residential (60% of assessed valuation) with a significant commercial (25%) and industrial (14%) presence. The City of Waukegan's socioeconomic profile is weak relative to similarly rated entities. According to recent estimates by the 2006-2010 American Community Survey, Waukegan's median family income and per capita income was 85.0% and 73.5% of the national average. At 8.7% as of March 2015, the city's unemployment rate was significantly higher than the state (6.3%) and national (5.6%) rates for the same period. FINANCIAL OPERATIONS AND RESERVES: HEALTHY RESERVES OFFSET RISKS PRESENTED BY VALUATION DECLINES AND PROPERTY TAX RATE CAPS Despite reliance on property tax revenues and currently levying the maximum rates for key operating funds, we expect the district's financial profile to remain healthy given ample reserves, stable operations, and significant expenditure flexibility. As the district's tax base has declined rapidly in recent years, tax rates have risen to maintain levy levels. A majority of the district's individual funds have rate limits imposed through Illinois' Property Tax Extension Limitation Law (PTELL). As of 2014, the district has reached the rate limit for its two primary operating funds (General and Recreation). A declining tax base, coupled with an inability to increase tax rates, will likely limit the district's revenue raising flexibility in the near term. Similarly, with the city's below average wealth levels, management has limited flexibility in raising fees for programs and services. Offsetting the limited revenue raising flexibility is the district's stable financial operations and ample reserves. The Operating Fund (comprised of the General, Recreation, Illinois Municipal Retirement, Working Cash, and Debt Service Funds), ended fiscal 2014 with an operating surplus of about $994,000 and an available fund balance of $11.9 million, or a healthy 98.4% of revenues. While audited information is not yet available for fiscal 2015, officials expect to end the year with a modest operating surplus. Officials are also budgeting for balanced operations in fiscal 2016. Property taxes are the district's primary source of revenue, accounting for 76% of total Operating Fund revenues in fiscal 2014. The district reached its maximum allowable rate for the General and Recreation levy in 2009 and 2013, respectively. While this will limit the district's ability to raise revenues in the near term, the district benefits from a significant amount of expenditure flexibility. Approximately 15.0% of total Operating Fund expenditures are comprised of annual transfers out of the General Fund to the Capital Projects Fund. Officials report these capital transfers are part of a longer-term plan to cash finance the construction of an outdoor swimming pool. Such discretionary transfers provide ample expenditure flexibility if revenues were to decline as a result of the district's restricted revenue raising ability. Liquidity The district's fiscal 2014 Operating Fund net cash balance was $7.8 million or a healthy 64.2% of revenues. Outside of the Operating Fund, the district ended fiscal 2014 with a cash balance of $11.2 million in its Capital Projects Fund. Officials report that up to $9.4 million of the cash reserves held in the Capital Projects Fund is expected to be spent down within the year to construct a new outdoor swimming pool. This amount may decrease if the district is able to obtain a discretionary capital grant from the State of Illinois (A3 negative). DEBT AND PENSIONS: MODEST DEBT BURDEN; NO FUTURE BORROWING PLANS We expect the district's debt position to remain stable due to a lack of future borrowing plans. At fiscal year-end 2014, the district's direct debt burden was $19.4 million, or a modest 0.7% of full value. Outstanding debt is inclusive of $17.7 million of GO alternate revenue debt and $1.7 million of general obligation limited tax (GOLT) debt secured by the district's debt service extension base (DSEB). The district annually issues short term GOLT bonds that fully leverage its DSEB to pay debt service on the district's GO alternate revenue bonds. The DSEB was approximately $1.7 million in 2014. Debt Structure All of the district's direct debt is fixed rate and amortizes over the long term. Principal amortization is below average, with 59.4% of principal repaid within ten years.

Debt-Related Derivatives The district has no derivatives. Pensions and OPEB The district's pension liabilities are manageable, based on unfunded liabilities for its participation in the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF), a multi-employer agent plan. For fiscal 2014, the district contributed $385,000, which was equal to the actuarially determined annual contribution requirement (ARC). Moody's fiscal 2014 adjusted net pension liability (ANPL) for the district, under our methodology for adjusting reported pension data, is $5.2 million, equal to 0.4 times operating revenues and 0.2% of full value. Moody's ANPL reflects certain adjustments we make to improve comparability of reported pension liabilities. The adjustments are not intended to replace the district's reported liability information, but to improve comparability with other rated entities. MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE: STRONG MANAGEMENT WITH LONG-TERM FISCAL PLANNING Illinois special districts have an institutional framework score of "Aa", or strong. These districts generally benefit from sufficient revenue raising authority and flexible expenditure requirements to mitigate enterprise risk. While Waukegan Park District's revenue raising flexibility is restricted due to property tax rate caps, the district maintains a significant amount of expenditure flexibility. The district also benefits from strength in management which has historically utilized conservative budgeting practices and long-term fiscal planning. KEY STATISTICS -Tax Base: Full Value: $2.9 billion -Full Value Per Capita: $32,600 -Median Family Income: 85.0% of U.S. Median -Fund Balance as % of Revenues: 98.4% -5-Year Dollar Change in Fund Balance as % of Revenues: 36.4% -Cash Balance as % of Revenues: 64.2% -5-Year Dollar Change in cash Balance as % of Revenues: 23.5% -Institutional Framework: 'Aa' -5-Year Average of Operating Revenues / Operating Expenditures: 1.06x -Net Direct Debt / Full Value: 0.7% -Net Direct Debt / Operating Revenues: 1.6x -3-Year Average Moody's ANPL / Full Value: 0.2% -3-Year Average Moody's ANPL / Operating Revenues: 0.5x OBLIGOR PROFILE Waukegan Park District covers 21 square miles, is essentially coterminous with the City of Waukegan, and is located along the western shore of Lake Michigan. The district owns and operates 47 park sites, a recreation center, a cultural arts center, an outdoor swimming pool, a museum, and numerous athletic fields. LEGAL SECURITY The GO alternate revenue bonds are ultimately secured by the district's general obligation unlimited tax pledge. However, the general levy on the bonds are expected to be abated annually, through a covered abatement, and offset by revenues generated from the district's DSEB as well as all other additional available pledged revenues. USE OF PROCEEDS Not applicable.

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY The principal methodology used in this rating was US Local Government General Obligation Debt published in January 2014. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. REGULATORY DISCLOSURES For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com. Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review. Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating. Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating. Analysts Francis Mamo Lead Analyst Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Genevieve Nolan Additional Contact Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Contacts Journalists: (212) 553-0376 Research Clients: (212) 553-1653 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 USA 2015 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ( MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ) MAY INCLUDE MOODY S

CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDER MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s Publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes

hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for retail clients to make any investment decision based on MOODY S credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. For Japan only: MOODY'S Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MOODY'S Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.