Budget restrictions of the Russian economic development in long-term prospect

Similar documents
Belarus Economy as part of Common Economic space: analysis and forecast

RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC FORECASTING Forecast of Russian economy indicators 1 : (Business as usual)

Institute of Economic Forecasting Russian Academy of Sciences Development of Budget Block in RIM model

A Quarterly Forecast of the Russian Economic Macroindicators : A Baseline Scenario 1

Forecasting the Development of Russian Economy Using the Dynamic Input Output Model with Fuzzy Parameters 1)

DEVELOPMENT TRENDS, INFLUENCE FACTORS, FORECAST MACROINDICATORS OF UKRAINE S ECONOMY FOR THE PERION UNTIL 1015

MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND TRADE OF UKRAINE

Quarterly Report for the Greek Economy

Factors of poland s economic growth after accession to the european union

FINANCIAL STABILITY IN THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS

Forecasting of employment in Russian interindustry model

RUSSIAN ECONOMIC OUTLOOK AND MONETARY POLICY CHALLENGES RUSSIAN ECONOMIC OUTLOOK AND MONETARY POLICY CHALLENGES. Bank of Russia.

Alexander Shirov. The long-term forecast of development of the Russian economy

The Israeli Economy Strong & Stable, A+

VTB Capital. Post-Crisis Challenges and Russian Economy Perspectives. Sergey Dubinin. February 24, Slide 1. VTB Capital

2 Macroeconomic Scenario

On the Economic Situation in Russia During Fourth Quarter of 2014 Third Quarter of 2015 and the Outlook for

UKRAINE WEEK HIGHLIGHTS

COMMISSION OPINION. of on the Draft Budgetary Plan of Italy and requesting Italy to submit a revised Draft Budgetary Plan

The Israeli Economy Strong & Stable, A+

THE ROLE OF INVESTMENT IN A SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ECONOMY OF LATVIA ABSTRACT

Influence of Monetary and External Trade Shocks on Russian Economy*

UKRAINE WEEK HIGHLIGHTS

Is the Euro Crisis Over?

Russia Monthly Economic Developments February 2019

December 2017 ECONOMIC FORECASTS FOR SPAIN 2018

Alexander O. Baranov

APPENDIX: Country analyses

11244/12 RD/NC/kp DG G1A

UN: Global economy at great risk of falling into renewed recession Different policy approaches are needed to address continued jobs crisis

Anti-crisis State Policy in Russia

RESEARCH INVESTMENT MARKET

ANNUAL REPORT of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the Year 2014

1. THE ECONOMY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS

The Dawn of a New Economic Era? Russia Economic Report April 2015 Edition No. 33

A.O. Baranov, V.N. Pavlov

Russia Monthly Economic Developments June 2018

Economic Environment Facing Business

MACROECONOMY OF THE RUSSIAN REGIONS NEIGHBORING WITH THE NEW EUROPEAN UNION

DÁNIEL PALOTAI PÉTER GÁBRIEL 5+1 CHARTS ON HUNGARY S CONVERGENCE TO THE BENELUX STATES

I. Continuing presence of some factors supporting the continuation of a low inflation level:

Azerbaijani State Budget in 2016 Perspectives and Challenges

The fiscal adjustment after the crisis in Argentina

MINISTRY OF NATIONAL ECONOMY OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN KAZAKHSTAN

MACROECONOMIC FORECAST

DISCOVER YOUR WAY TO AZERBAIJAN

Global Aging and Financial Markets

Investment processes in the economies of Iran and Belarus 1

Kazakhstan: on the wave of structural reforms. Aset Irgaliyev, PhD First Deputy Chairman Economic Research Institute

BALANCE OF PAYMENTS¹ of the Republic of Azerbaijan for January September, 2015

The analysis and outlook of the current macroeconomic situation and macroeconomic policies

The Russian economy: growth under sanctions, top longterm trends, scenarios for the future

Previsions Macroeconòmiques. Macroeconomic scenario for the Catalan economy 2017 and June 2017

The Greek Economy: Implementing a new Model of Growth

Foreword Goods and Services Account

What is the global economic outlook?

О КЛЮЧЕВОЙ СТАВКЕ RUSSIAN ECONOMIC OUTLOOK AND CHALLENGES TO MONETARY POLICY. December Bank of Russia Presentation for Investors

Russia: Macro Outlook for 2019

Demographics and Secular Stagnation Hypothesis in Europe

Herzlia. Conference. Dr. Yacov. Prepared by

MACROECONOMIC AND DEFENCE POLICY OF THE CZECH ECONOMY DURING

Development of Economy and Financial Markets of Kazakhstan

Construction of the Dynamic Input - Output Model with Balance of Payments Block

There are many different types of economic systems but we going to focus on three:

POLAND: A NEW GROWTH POLE IN EUROPE. Dr. HENRYKA BOCHNIARZ, Seattle, 12 January 2012

A Glance to the Russian Finance & Economy June 04, 2007

C Forecast of the Development of Macroeconomic Indicators

Financial presentation of the Group for H1 2016

STATE AID, TAXATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN UKRAINE

Antonio Fazio: Overview of global economic and financial developments in first half 2004

Latest Macroeconomic Projections - May Vice-Governor Anita Angelovska-Bezhoska

Revista Economică 69:1 (2017) ROMANIA AND THE EURO. AN OVERVIEW OF MAASTRICHT CONVERGENCE CRITERIA FULFILLMENT

dr Bartłomiej Rokicki Chair of Macroeconomics and International Trade Theory Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw

Economic sanctions against Russia: their influence on banking sector

MCCI ECONOMIC OUTLOOK. Novembre 2017

Valentyn Povroznyuk, Radu Mihai Balan, Edilberto L. Segura

Russian Economy: Macroeconomic

PUBLIC SPENDING ON CULTURE IN EUROPE

SUMMARY OF MACROECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS

ITALY KEY FIGURES, TRENDS, STATE OF HEALTH. April 2013

INVESTMENT TRENDS AND THE LITHUANIAN INVESTMENT INDEX

Azerbaijan Economy in 2014

Characteristics of the Financial System of the Russian Federation

Macroeconomic projections for Assumptions from the external surrounding. Baseline macroeconomic scenario for

Introduction. Key results of the EU s 2018 Ageing Report. Europe. 2 July 2018

The impact of the ESIFs for Lithuanian economy in and the evaluation of development priorities for the programming period

RUSSIAN ECONOMIC OUTLOOK AND MONETARY POLICY CHALLENGES RUSSIAN ECONOMIC OUTLOOK AND MONETARY POLICY. Bank of Russia.

Y qué está pasando en Brasil?

4. Balance of Payments and Foreign Trade

Russia 2019: risk-averse mode. Dmitry Dolgin, Chief Economist, Russia & CIS November 2018

ESTIMATION OF THE MULTIPLICATIVE EFFECTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS

Chart 1 Development of real GDP by quarters (year-on-year growth in %)

NATIONAL BANK OF SERBIA. Speech at the presentation of the Inflation Report May 2013

5+1 charts on how Hungary can catch up with France

FX Idea Generation See What Others Don`t. Annie Grebenyuk November Option market makers are actually trading volatility and

A New Approach to Recommendation for obtaining interim estimates for purchasing power

Estonian economy and euro: benefits and challenges. 11 July 2013 Tõnu Palm, Chief-Economist, Nordea Markets Estonia

The macroeconomic effects of a carbon tax in the Netherlands Íde Kearney, 13 th September 2018.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURE AND COOPERATION OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR IN R&D IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC

CRISIS: CHALLENGE AND OPPORTUNITY

Transcription:

Institute of Economic Forecasting, Russian Academy of Sciences Budget restrictions of the Russian economic development in long-term prospect Performed by Savchishina Ksenia Institute of Economic Forecasting September, 2012

Inertial (basic) scenario - calculations Quarter macroeconomic model of Russian economy (QUMMIR) data: the 1 st quarter 1993 the 4 th quarter 2011 forecast period: 2012-2020 basic scenario: external conditions optimistic internal conditions restrictions from labor force and fixed capital

Inertial (basic) scenario main exogenous parameters Growth of oil and gas prices; Increase of gas production (by 18% till 2020); Gas export will rise by 36% till 2020; Increase of dollar and euro exchange rate; Stable growth of the USA and Europe economies; Oil export growth (in natural terms) will be very low; Working-age population reduction and the increasing number of retirees MAIN EXOGENEOUS VARIABLES 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 EXTERNAL CONDITIONS VARIABLES Oil price Urals, $/bar. 112 118 124 128 132 Gas price, $/1000 m3 388 345 374 400 425 Oil export, mln t 234 240 244 250 255 Gas export, bln m3 207 241 266 270 282 Oil extraction, mln t 514 510 512 517 518 Gas extraction, bln m3 697 741 776 796 824 Euro zone GDP growth rates,% -0,5 1,4 1,4 1,4 1,3 USA GDP growth rates,% 1,7 2,8 2,5 2,2 2,0 EXCHANGE RATES VARIABLES (average for year) Dollar exchange rate 31,3 33,5 35,3 37,1 38,9 Euro exchange rate 39,7 40,5 43,7 43,0 43,0 INVESTMENT ACTIVITY VARAIBLES House lead-in, mln m2 67 74 77 82 85 CONSOLIDATED STATE BUDGET PARAMETERS Expenditures for economy to general amount of expenditures 23 23 24 24 24 Pension,average for year, $ 292 301 311 330 347 DEMOGRAPHY VARAIBLES (mln. people) Working age population 85,8 83,8 82,2 80,4 79,2

Inertial (basic) scenario budget exogenous parameters main tax rates will be on the 2012 level: VAT tax rate 18% company profit tax rate 20% personal income tax rate 13% social insurance tax rate 30%; value of the government loans will not increase greatly: 0.1% to GDP for external loans 1-1.5% to GDP for the internal ones; budget expenditures structure will not change: share of expenses for national economy (inc. investments) will be 23-24% for education and public health 23% for transfers to finance deficit of the Pension fund 12.5% for public government 4.3-5.5% for interests payments of government debt 2.5%; growth of the average pension will be 4%-6% per year

Inertial (basic) scenario main forecast results 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 DYNAMICS OF GDP and ITS COMPONENTS IN 2008 PRICES, % GDP 5,0 4,8 5,1 4,8 4,5 Households consumption 5,5 6,5 5,2 4,5 4,3 Public consumption 1,0 0,7 0,9 1,0 1,1 Fixed capital accumulation 9,5 7,9 9,3 9,9 8,3 Export 0,6 1,6 1,4 1,3 1,4 Import 10,5 5,4 3,2 4,4 4,1 1. growth of the households consumption will exceed the GDP dynamics, but will be insufficient to complete saturation of demand; 2. dynamics of investments in 2012-2020 will be 8.8% in average per year exceeding the GDP growth rate that will lead to increase of accumulation rate from 22% in 2012 to 30% in 2020; 3. export dynamics will be limited by low growth rates of oil extraction and export; 4. stagnation of public consumption growth rates at level of 0.7-1.1% per year

Inertial (basic) scenario main forecast results 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 MACROINDICATORS IN CURRENT PRICES GDP, including (% to total): Gross profit and gross mixed income 33,8 33,9 36,3 37,8 39,1 Salary fund (including latent) 46,5 47,6 46,7 46,5 46,2 Net taxes on production and import 19,7 18,5 17,0 15,7 14,7 GDP per capita by PPP (ths. US dollars) 23,5 26,7 31,2 35,4 39,9 Share of GDP per capita in US GDP estimated by PPP, % 44,9 47,4 51,4 54,4 57,3 International reserves (bln.dollars) 574 672 795 922 1060 DEFLATORS DYNAMICS, % per year GDP deflator 7,5 6,6 5,8 5,1 4,7 Consumer price index 6,2 5,6 5,1 4,6 4,1 HOUSEHOLDS INCOMES (% to GDP) Households incomes 62,2 61,6 58,6 56,5 54,4 Formal savings 2,4 2,5 2,3 2,2 2,1 Net household credits, per year 0,3 3,2 3,9 4,3 4,9 LABOR FORCE Labor productivity, dynamics in % 106,3 104,4 104,2 104,0 103,2 Employed, mln people 71,0 69,8 70,4 70,9 71,7 Unemployed, mln people 4,8 4,1 4,0 3,5 2,8 GDP per capita by PPP in the USA level will be less than 58%; labor productivity growth (in 1.4 times in 2012-2020) won't allow to remove completely restriction by the labor supply; Share of gross profit in GDP by sources of income will growth significantly because of decrease of the net taxes share; Households incomes (% to the GDP) will decrease despite of growth of net credits

Inertial (basic) scenario budget variables forecast 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 Incomes of consolidated budget, trln. rubles 20,2 23,4 27,0 30,2 33,7 - share of oil-and-gas incomes, % 31,9 28,6 26,7 24,9 23,4 - share of non oil-and-gas incomes, % 68,1 71,4 73,3 75,1 76,6 Incomes of consolidated budget, % to GDP 33,0 30,9 28,6 26,4 24,7 Expenditures of consolidated budget, trln. rubles 20,7 24,8 27,5 30,4 33,6 Expenditures of consolidated budget, % to GDP 33,8 32,7 29,0 26,6 24,6 Deficit of consolidated budget, % to GDP -0,8-1,8-0,4-0,2 0,1 Net government paper issue, % to GDP 1,1 1,4 0,9 0,9 0,5 Net external loans, % to GDP -0,2 0,1 0,0-0,1-0,1 Expenditures for education, % to GDP 4,1 3,9 3,5 3,2 3,0 Expenditures for public health, % to GDP 4,3 4,1 3,7 3,4 3,1 Ratio of average pension to average salary, % 16,3 14,3 12,8 11,9 11,2 In 2012-2016 the budget incomes dynamics will be 7.1-7.8% per year, 5.6%-5.9% in 2017-2020; Decrease of share of the oil and gas incomes in the budget revenues (from 32% in 2012 to 23.4% in 2020); The budget expenditures increase will be in 5-7 times less than in 2005-2008; The pension dynamics will decelerate from 13.5% in 2012 to 5% per year in 2013-2020; Dynamics of the national economy expenses won't exceed 10% in 2013-2016 and 6% in 2017-2020; The consolidated budget will be completely balanced only in 2019 CONSOLIDATED BUDGET PARAMETERS SOCIAL PARAMETERS

Inertial (basic) scenario demands to the public budget sphere increase of the budget role in investment activity by: - the budget investments in the infrastructure projects - co-financing of interest payments for investment loans etc.; increase of a living standards of the population and corresponding growth of the households consumption: - increase of the pensions (to pre-crisis growth rate) - growth of salaries in the budget sector; increase of financing of education and public health sectors; intensification of the public consumption scenario of tax rates increase scenario of changes of the budget expenditures structure and a schedule of their financing within a year

Scenario of tax rate increase budget exogenous parameters Tax rates 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 VAT 18% 18% 21% 21% 24% 24% 24% 24% 24% Company profit tax Personal income tax 20% 22% 22% 24% 24% 27% 27% 27% 27% 13% 13% 15% 15% 15% 15% 17% 17% 17% 1. increase of excises rates was already realized in the inertial forecast; 2. increase of tax rates on the gas production and export contains also in the basic scenario; 3. tax rates on the oil production and export is not reasonable to increase as restrictions on the oil production won't allow to raise tax burden on this branch; 4. import duties taxes will not be raised in connection with Russia's entry to the World Trade Organization; 5. tax rates of social contributions seem to be maximum permissible

Scenario of tax rate increase main forecast results* THE MAIN FORECAST RESULTS - DINAMICS 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 DYNAMICS OF GDP and ITS COMPONENTS IN 2008 PRICES, % GDP 5,0 4,8 5,1 4,8 4,5 6,0 4,1 5,8 4,9 5,3 Households consumption 5,5 6,5 5,2 4,5 4,3 6,5 5,7 5,7 3,9 4,9 Public consumption 1,0 0,7 0,9 1,0 1,1 0,7 1,2 1,7 1,7 1,7 Fixed capital accumulation 9,5 7,9 9,3 9,9 8,3 11,9 5,6 10,5 10,8 9,7 Export 0,6 1,6 1,4 1,3 1,4 0,6 1,6 1,4 1,3 1,4 Import 10,5 5,4 3,2 4,4 4,1 10,9 5,2 3,5 4,5 4,6 * the top line - results of the inertial forecast, bottom line the scenario with the raised tax rates Intensification of economic growth from 4.6% on the average in 2012-2020 in the inertial forecast to 5.1%: increase of the households consumption because of growth of pensions (from 300 dollars per month in 2012 to 720 dollars in 2020); rise of the public consumption (annual dynamics will be 1.1%) will have longterm character (till the end of the forecast period); acceleration of investment activity will allow to exceed minimum level of investments dynamics (10%) required for removal of restrictions on the capital

Scenario of tax rate increase main forecast results* 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 MACROINDICATORS IN CURRENT PRICES GDP, including (% to total): Gross profit and gross mixed income 33,8 33,9 36,3 37,8 39,1 34,8 33,1 34,6 35,7 37,4 Salary fund (including latent) 46,5 47,6 46,7 46,5 46,2 45,6 47,1 46,1 46,2 45,7 Net taxes on production and import 19,7 18,5 17,0 15,7 14,7 19,5 19,7 19,3 18,0 16,8 GDP per capita by PPP (ths. US dollars) 23,5 26,7 31,2 35,4 39,9 23,7 27,1 32,0 36,5 41,9 Share of GDP per capita in US GDP estimated by PPP, % 44,9 47,4 51,4 54,4 57,3 45,4 48,0 52,6 56,1 60,2 * the top line - results of the inertial forecast, bottom line the scenario with the raised tax rates Reduction of the business and households disposable incomes by the tax mechanism won't be extremely high: the gross profit share will reduce only in 2012-2014, then it will rise (to 37.4% of the GDP); the population disposable incomes will growth in average by 8-10% annually

Scenario of tax rate increase social and budget parameters forecast CONSOLIDATED BUDGET PARAMETERS 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 Incomes of consolidated budget, % to GDP 33,0 30,9 28,6 26,4 24,7 32,6 32,8 31,5 30,4 28,4 Expenditures of consolidated budget, % to GDP 33,8 32,7 29,0 26,6 24,6 33,5 34,0 31,5 30,3 28,3 Deficit of consolidated budget, % to GDP -0,8-1,8-0,4-0,2 0,1-0,9-1,2 0,0 0,1 0,1 SOCIAL PARAMETERS Expenditures for education, % to GDP 4,1 3,9 3,5 3,2 3,0 4,0 4,1 3,8 3,6 3,4 Expenditures for public health, % to GDP 4,3 4,1 3,7 3,4 3,1 4,2 4,3 4,0 3,8 3,6 Ratio of average pension to average salary, % 16,3 14,3 12,8 11,9 11,2 16,6 15,7 15,6 15,5 15,9 * the top line - results of the inertial forecast, bottom line the scenario with the raised tax rates The value of the consolidated budget incomes in % to the GDP will decrease from 31.8% in 2012 to 28.4% in 2020 (nevertheless, being more than level of the inertial forecast 24.7%); It will be possible to balance the consolidated budget in 2016 (in the inertial scenario in 2019); Decrease of the main social parameters will be less sharp than in the inertial scenario

Scenario of changes of the budget expenditures structure and financing schedule budget exogenous parameters The main features: no changes of the tax system (except being included in the inertial scenario); emphasis will be made on change of a financing schedule of the budget expenses and their structure; main target indicators: - increase of average old-age pension level - production of the Value Added in the services of a social orientation (education and public health care)

Problems in financing mechanism of the budget expenses Unevenness of the public expenditures financing during fiscal year in the inertial scenario: - in the 1st quarter less than 20% of the planned value of expenses, - in the 2nd quarter 22%, - in the 3rd quarter 23%, - in the 4th quarter - more than 35% are financed In new scenario the hypothesis about the following schedule of financing is accepted: - in the 1st quarter - 23.5% from the planned level of expenses, - in the 2nd quarter 24.5%, - in the 3rd quarter 25%, - in the 4th quarter 27% are financed

Problems in financing mechanism of the budget expenses (2) Inertial scenario: the budget costs structure produces very low growth rates in branches "Education" and "Public health" (0.1% and 0.8% per year respectively) Expenses for education in Russia (5.3% to the GDP in 2008) are less than ones in many developed countries (8% in the USA, 5.9% in France, 6% in Great Britain), though the number of students on 1000 people (70 students) exceeds twice similar indicators of France and Great Britain and for 15% - an indicator of the USA Expenses for public health is much less than in other countries with similar age structure of the population: in Russia this indicator is equal 5.2% to the GDP (2008), in the USA 16%, in France 11.1%, in Germany 10.4%, in Poland 6.6% Expected growth of pensioners number will be 9.4% till 2020 (or 3.7 million people) that will raise burden of the public health system

Scenario of changes of the budget expenditures structure and financing schedule budget exogenous parameters Expenditure structure, % 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Education 15% 15% 16% 16% 17% 19% 20% 20% 21% Public health 14% 14% 17% 19% 21% 21% 23% 23% 24% Transfers to Pension fund 14% 13% 13% 14% 15% 15% 17% 18% 19% National economy 31% 32% 30% 29% 25% 23% 18% 17% 14% Public administration 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Other expenses 21% 21% 19% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% Main idea: increase share of budget expenses for education, public health and pensions by decreasing share of government, defense and government investments expenditures

Scenario of changes of the budget expenditures structure and financing schedule main forecast results:* THE MAIN FORECAST RESULTS - DINAMICS 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 DYNAMICS OF GDP and ITS COMPONENTS IN 2008 PRICES, % GDP 5,0 4,8 5,1 4,8 4,5 6,1 5,2 5,5 5,2 5,1 Households consumption 5,5 6,5 5,2 4,5 4,3 6,5 7,0 5,9 5,5 5,1 Public consumption 1,0 0,7 0,9 1,0 1,1 0,5 1,3 1,8 2,5 2,1 Fixed capital accumulation 9,5 7,9 9,3 9,9 8,3 13,0 7,7 8,8 8,9 8,5 Export 0,6 1,6 1,4 1,3 1,4 0,6 1,6 1,4 1,3 1,4 Import 10,5 5,4 3,2 4,4 4,1 11,0 5,6 3,4 4,7 4,4 * the top line - results of the inertial forecast, bottom line the scenario of changes of the budget expenditures financing mechanism increase of average annual growth rate of GDP by 0.6 points; change of the budget expenditure structure will lead to an intensification of households and public consumption with simultaneous reduction of investments growth rates; the share of the state investments reducing from 15% in 2012 to 6% in 2020

Scenario of changes of the budget expenditures structure and financing schedule budget forecast results:* 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 Incomes of consolidated budget, % to GDP 33,0 30,9 28,6 26,4 24,7 32,6 30,5 28,2 26,0 24,2 Expenditures of consolidated budget, % to GDP 33,8 32,7 29,0 26,6 24,6 33,4 32,3 28,8 26,6 24,8 Deficit of consolidated budget, % to GDP -0,8-1,8-0,4-0,2 0,1-0,8-1,8-0,6-0,6-0,6 Expenditures for education, % to GDP 4,1 3,9 3,5 3,2 3,0 4,0 5,2 4,9 5,3 5,2 Expenditures for public health, % to GDP 4,3 4,1 3,7 3,4 3,1 4,7 5,5 6,0 6,1 6,0 Ratio of average pension to average salary, % 16,3 14,3 12,8 11,9 11,2 16,6 15,8 15,6 15,5 15,8 CONSOLIDATED BUDGET PARAMETERS SOCIAL PARAMETERS * the top line - results of the inertial forecast, bottom line the scenario of changes of the budget expenditures financing mechanism increase of the monthly average pension for 10% per year to $720 in 2020 (that will be 16% to average salary); the budget expenses on public health will increase to 6% to the GDP (from 4.7% in 2012); the budget expenses for education will increase from 4% to 5.2% to the GDP; the consolidated budget will be executed with deficit during all forecast period; intensification of the economic dynamics with realization of the socially oriented budgetary expenses is possible, but only on condition of the government loans growth or use of the sovereign oil-and-gas funds (which are about 145 bln.$)

Thank you! Savchishina Ksenia savchishinak@mail.ru