Experimental Evidence of Bank Runs as Pure Coordination Failures

Similar documents
Herding and Bank Runs

FINANCIAL CONTAGION IN THE LABORATORY: DOES NETWORK STRUCTURE MATTER?

Herding and Bank Runs

Financial Fragility A Global-Games Approach Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

A Baseline Model: Diamond and Dybvig (1983)

Do Sunspots Matter? Evidence from an Experimental Study of Bank Runs

Expectations vs. Fundamentals-based Bank Runs: When should bailouts be permitted?

Liquidity, moral hazard and bank runs

The Welfare Cost of Asymmetric Information: Evidence from the U.K. Annuity Market

Credit Market Competition and Liquidity Crises

Macroeconomics 4 Notes on Diamond-Dygvig Model and Jacklin

Séptimas Jornadas de Economía Monetaria e Internacional La Plata, 9 y 10 de mayo de 2002

The New Growth Theories - Week 6

Monetary Economics: Problem Set #6 Solutions

Bailouts, Bail-ins and Banking Crises

Experiments on Auctions

Supplement to the lecture on the Diamond-Dybvig model

Low Interest Rate Policy and Financial Stability

Securitization in a Model of Regional Liquidity Shocks and Priv

Endogenous Protection: Lobbying

A Theory of Endogenous Liquidity Cycles

In Diamond-Dybvig, we see run equilibria in the optimal simple contract.

Models of Directed Search - Labor Market Dynamics, Optimal UI, and Student Credit

An Experiment on the Causes of Bank Run Contagions

QBER DISCUSSION PAPER No. 6/2013. How Strongly Do Players React to Increased Risk Sharing in an Experimental Bank Run Game?

The Diamond-Dybvig Revolution: Extensions Based on the Original DD Environment

Liquidity and Solvency Risks

Why are Banks Highly Interconnected?

Unfunded Pension and Labor Supply: Characterizing the Nature of the Distortion Cost

Economics Department Discussion Papers Series ISSN

Macroeconomia 1 Class 14a revised Diamond Dybvig model of banks

Real Wage Rigidities and Disin ation Dynamics: Calvo vs. Rotemberg Pricing

Antoine Martin (Federal Reserve Bank of New York) Bank liquidity, Interbank Market and Monetary Policy. le 2 juillet 2009, 14:30 16:00.

A Model with Costly Enforcement

Banks and Liquidity Crises in Emerging Market Economies

N-Player Preemption Games

On Freezing Depositor Funds at Financially Distressed Banks: An Experimental Analysis *

International Journal of Economic Theory

Are more risk averse agents more optimistic? Insights from a rational expectations model

EC202. Microeconomic Principles II. Summer 2009 examination. 2008/2009 syllabus

Supply-side effects of monetary policy and the central bank s objective function. Eurilton Araújo

M. R. Grasselli. February, McMaster University. ABM and banking networks. Lecture 3: Some motivating economics models. M. R.

WORKING PAPER NO BANKING PANICS AND OUTPUT DYNAMICS. Daniel Sanches Research Department Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Microeconomics II Lecture 8: Bargaining + Theory of the Firm 1 Karl Wärneryd Stockholm School of Economics December 2016

Middlesex University Research Repository

Expectations versus Fundamentals: Does the Cause of Banking Panics Matter for Prudential Policy?

Public and Secret Reserve Prices in ebay Auctions

Sunspot Bank Runs and Fragility: The Role of Financial Sector Competition

EC202. Microeconomic Principles II. Summer 2011 Examination. 2010/2011 Syllabus ONLY

Algorithmic and High-Frequency Trading

Tax Competition and Coordination in the Context of FDI

For on-line Publication Only ON-LINE APPENDIX FOR. Corporate Strategy, Conformism, and the Stock Market. June 2017

Moral hazard, e ciency and bank crises

Revisiting the cost of children: theory and evidence from Ireland

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Economics Department Bendheim Center for Finance. FINANCIAL CRISES ECO 575 (Part II) Spring Semester 2003

Poverty Traps and Social Protection

Speculative Attacks and the Theory of Global Games

1. Monetary credibility problems. 2. In ation and discretionary monetary policy. 3. Reputational solution to credibility problems

DOES COMPENSATION AFFECT BANK PROFITABILITY? EVIDENCE FROM US BANKS

Economia Finanziaria e Monetaria

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Spring, 2013

OPTIMAL INCENTIVES IN A PRINCIPAL-AGENT MODEL WITH ENDOGENOUS TECHNOLOGY. WP-EMS Working Papers Series in Economics, Mathematics and Statistics

Banks and Liquidity Crises in Emerging Market Economies

For Online Publication Only. ONLINE APPENDIX for. Corporate Strategy, Conformism, and the Stock Market

MFE Macroeconomics Week 8 Exercises

A Diamond-Dybvig Model in which the Level of Deposits is Endogenous

Asset Pricing under Information-processing Constraints

Consumption and Asset Pricing

Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity

Monetary and Financial Macroeconomics

The lender of last resort: liquidity provision versus the possibility of bail-out

Principles of Optimal Taxation

Interbank market liquidity and central bank intervention

The Transmission of Monetary Policy through Redistributions and Durable Purchases

Contract Nonperformance Risk and Ambiguity in Insurance Markets

1 Excess burden of taxation

Mixed strategies in PQ-duopolies

Strategic Pre-Commitment

DYNAMIC DEBT MATURITY

FDPE Microeconomics 3 Spring 2017 Pauli Murto TA: Tsz-Ning Wong (These solution hints are based on Julia Salmi s solution hints for Spring 2015.

Solutions to problem set x C F = $50:000 + x x = $50: x = 10 9 (C F $50:000)

Answer Key for M. A. Economics Entrance Examination 2017 (Main version)

On Diamond-Dybvig (1983): A model of liquidity provision

Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth

INTERMEDIATE MACROECONOMICS

Appendix: Model and Experiments

Fluctuations in the economy s output. 1. Three Components of Investment

Bank Runs: The Pre-Deposit Game

Budget Management In GSP (2018)

Accounting for Patterns of Wealth Inequality

Discussion of Chiu, Meh and Wright

Suggested solutions to the 6 th seminar, ECON4260

Liquidity, Asset Price, and Welfare

A Decentralized Learning Equilibrium

Regulatory Arbitrage and Systemic Liquidity Crises

On Delays in Project Completion With Cost Reduction: An Experiment

Bubbles. Macroeconomics IV. Ricardo J. Caballero. Spring 2011 MIT. R.J. Caballero (MIT) Bubbles Spring / 29

Investment is one of the most important and volatile components of macroeconomic activity. In the short-run, the relationship between uncertainty and

Self-fulfilling and Fundamental Banking Crises: A Multinomial Logit Approach. Abstract

Notes on classical growth theory (optional read)

Transcription:

Experimental Evidence of Bank Runs as Pure Coordination Failures Jasmina Arifovic (Simon Fraser) Janet Hua Jiang (Bank of Canada and U of Manitoba) Yiping Xu (U of International Business and Economics) August 11, 211 Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 1 / 43

Introduction Classic model of bank runs: Diamond and Dybvig (1983) Banks provide liquidity insurance through investment in illiquid long-term project and issuance of short-term debt (demand deposit) The demand deposit contract exhibits payo externality Two symmetric pure strategy Nash eqa: run & non-run Bank runs may occur as pure coordination failures The theory does not provide good explanation about which eqm is selected Competing view: bank runs are caused by deterioration of the quality of the bank s assets (Allen and Gale, 1998) Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 2 / 43

Introduction Empirical testing of the bank-run models is di cult Real world bank runs tend to involve various factors: hard to determine whether bank runs are due to miscoordination, or weakening assets Empirical investigation gives mixed results Gorton (1988), Allen and Gale (1998) and Schumacher (2): bank runs have historically been strongly correlated with deteriorating economic fundamentals Boyd et al. (21): bank runs are often the outcome of coordination failures Advantage of an experimental study: control the di erent factors that may induce bank runs Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 3 / 43

Introduction We study whether bank runs can occur as pure coordination failures (and if yes, under what conditions) Fix ROR of the bank s long-term asset: rule out deterioration of bank s asset as source of bank runs Fix the short-term rate for some time before changing it: subjects interact in an environment with minimal change so that they can focus on coordination decision The short-term rate a ects the "coordination requirement parameter": With payo externality, payo to withdrawing late increasers with the number of late withdrawers Coordination requirement parameter: minimum fraction of depositors choosing to withdraw late so that the strategy gives higher payo than withdrawing early Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 4 / 43

Introduction Main results Bank runs can occur as pure coordination failures, but only when coordination requirement is high A version of evolutionary learning algorithm captures experimental data Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 / 43

Literature Experimental Studies of Bank Runs Madiès (26): suspension of payments combined with "narrow banking" solution, or full deposit coverage can eliminate bank runs Garrat and Keister (29): bank runs occur more frequently when there is aggregate liquidity risk, or when depositors have multiple withdrawing opportunities Schotter and Yorulmazer (29) Depositors are willing to wait to nd out what other depositors have done The presence of insiders slows down runs Deposit insurance, even of a limited type, mitigates severity of bank runs. Klos and Sträter (21): global game theory of bank runs Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 6 / 43

Theory: DD Model of Bank Runs Preference shocks realized N patient: u(c 1+c 2) D N impatient: u(c 1) Investment liquidation Early consumption Investment matures Late consumption 1 2 t D ex ante identical agents facing preference/ liquidity shocks to be realized at date 1 Endowment of 1 unit of goods Investment: ROR=R>1 at date 2; ROR=1 if liquidated at date 1 Optimal risk sharing: Impatient consume ci at date 1, patient consume cp at date 2, with 1 < ci < cp < R. Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 7 / 43

Theory: DD Model of Bank Runs Demand Deposit Contract c e = c` = r, if z ẑ, r w.p. D ẑ ẑ z D z and w.p. D z, if z ẑ; ( D r (D z) z R, if z ẑ,, if z ẑ r = c ` z :number of late withdrawers c e (c`) :payo to early (late) withdrawers ẑ = D/r :min # of late withdrawals to prevent bankruptcy at date 1.!Two symmetric pure strategy Nash eqa: z = and z = N. Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 8 / 43

Experimental Design D = N = 1 : focus on strategic players R = 2 Abstract from sequential service constraint, the payo function is N c e = min r, ; (1) N z N r(n z) c` = max, R. (2) z Payo externality exists if r > 1. Two symmetric pure strategy Nash eqa: z = N, c = R (non-run eqm) z =, c = 1(run eqm); Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 9 / 43

Experimental Design r changes every 1 periods: agents interact in a stable environment with minimal change r determines the coordination requirement η N (N z)r r = z R! z, η = z R (r 1) /N = r (R 1) Each session has 7 phases, each phase has 1 periods Phase 1 2 3 4 6 7 r 1.43 1. 1.11 1.18 1.33 1.4 1.67 1.82 η.6.1.2.3..7.8.9 Period (" η) -9-1-1 11-2 21-3 31-4 41-1-6 61-7 Period (# η) -9-61-7 1-6 41-31-4 21-3 11-2 1-1 Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 1 / 43

Experimental Design 8 sessions (4 with " η, 4 with # η) Location: SFU (Burnaby), UofM (Winnipeg), UIBE (Beijing). 1 subjects from upper level and grad econ and business classes Each subject begins each period with 1 experimental dollar in the bank and makes withdrawing decision Each subject is assigned a computer terminal; communication is prohibited Payo tables provided so that players focus on playing the coordination game Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 11 / 43

Table (for practice): payo if n of other 9 subjects withdraw r = 1.43 n payo if withdraw payo if leave money in the bank 1.43 2. 1 1.43 1.9 2 1.43 1.79 3 1.43 1.63 4 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.14 6 1.43.71 7 1.2. 8 1.11. 9 1.. Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 12 / 43

Experimental Design After all subjects make decisions, z and payo are calculated History of own actions, payo s, and cumulative payo s shown at the end of each period Experimental dollars converted to cash; average pay 1. x what can be earned as tutors Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 13 / 43

Experimental Results 1 Increasing η 1 Decreasing η SFU1 1 2 3 4 6 7 SFU2 1 2 3 4 6 7 1 1 UIBE1 1 2 3 4 6 7 UIBE2 1 2 3 4 6 7 1 1 UIBE3 1 2 3 4 6 7 UIBE4 1 2 3 4 6 7 1 1 UofM1 UofM2 1 2 3 4 6 7 1 2 3 4 6 7.1.2.3..7.8.9 η η.9.8.7..3.2.1 Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 14 / 43

Experimental Results Finding 1. More coordination at late withdrawal when coordination requirement is lower. Finding 2. When coordination is low (η =.1,.2,.3,.), all experimental economies stay close to or converge to the non-run equilibrium When coordination is high (η =.8,.9), all experimental economies stay close to or converge to the run equilibrium When η =.7, experimental economies perform very di erently. Finding 3. There is a stronger learning e ect for intermediate values of η. Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 1 / 43

Evolutionary Algorithm Young (1993), Kandori et. al (1993) Two components: Myopic best response with inertia Experimentation: random strategy change with prob δ. Standard Algorithm Prob of playing best response and experimentation is exogenous. Temzelides (1997): as δ!, stay in non-run (run) eqm with prob 1 if η <. (if η >.). Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 16 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Algorithm depends on agents information sets: η and possibly z t 1. Myopic best response with inertia: Played only when subjects can infer whether z t 1 > z. Experimentation: Prob depends on η; and also on z t 1 if subjects can infer z t 1. Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 17 / 43

Simulation with Modi ed Algorithm Estimate probability of experimentation using experimental data Same parameters as in the experiments: 1 players, 7 phases, each phase has 1 rounds Use z for each of the 8 sessions Apply the modi ed algorithm using estimated prob of experimentation Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 18 / 43

A Sample Simulated Path of z 1 Increasing η 1 Decreasing η Simulated SFU1 1 2 3 4 6 7 Simulated SFU2 1 2 3 4 6 7 1 1 Simulated UIBE1 1 2 3 4 6 7 Simulated UIBE2 1 2 3 4 6 7 1 1 Simulated UIBE3 1 2 3 4 6 7 Simulated UIBE4 1 2 3 4 6 7 1 1 Simulated UofM1 1 2 3 4 6 7.1.2.3..7.8.9 η Simulated UofM2 1 2 3 4 6 7 η.9.8.7..3.2.1 Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 19 / 43

Experimental Results 1 Increasing η 1 Decreasing η SFU1 1 2 3 4 6 7 SFU2 1 2 3 4 6 7 1 1 UIBE1 1 2 3 4 6 7 UIBE2 1 2 3 4 6 7 1 1 UIBE3 1 2 3 4 6 7 UIBE4 1 2 3 4 6 7 1 1 UofM1 UofM2 1 2 3 4 6 7 1 2 3 4 6 7.1.2.3..7.8.9 η η.9.8.7..3.2.1 Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 2 / 43

Conclusion Bank runs can happen as the result of pure coordination failures when coordination is di cult. A critical value of the coordination parameter serves as the watershed for coordination. When coordination is easy (hard), subjects tend to coordinate at the non-run (run) equilibrium. The consensus breaks down when η is equal to.7. The endogenous evolutionary algorithm can capture the behavior of human subjects in the laboratory. Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 21 / 43

Future Work DD originally attribute banks runs to sunspot In this paper, we study whether bank runs in the absence of a sunspot variable. Sunspot behavior, especially in the context of a model with equilibria that can be Pareto ranked, is rarely observed in the lab. Du y and Fisher (2) and Fehr et al. (211): direct evidence of sunspots in the laboratory with non-pareto-rankable or Pareto-equivalent eqa. Arifovic et al. (211): some initial experimental evidence of sunspot behavior with Pareto rankable eqa. The experimental results in this paper suggest that the level of coordination requirement may a ect the occurrence of sunspot behavior. Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 22 / 43

Experimental Results Table 3: Performance Classi cation Category Label Criterion Very close to the non-run equilibrium NN M 9 Fairly close to the non-run equilibrium FN 8 M < 9 Converging to the non-run equilibrium CN < M < 8 and T 8 Moderate high coordination H < M < 8 and T < 8 Very close to the run equilibrium RR M 1 Fairly close to the run equilibrium FR 1 < M 2 Converging to the run equilibrium CR 2 < M < and T 2 Moderate low coordination L 2 < M < and T > 2 Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 23 / 43

Experimental Results Table 4: Performance of Experimental Economies η.1.2.3..7.8.9 SFU1 NN NN NN NN CR CR RR UIBE1 NN NN NN NN H CR RR UIBE3 NN NN NN NN CR RR RR UofM1 NN NN NN NN CR RR RR SFU2 NN NN NN NN CN CR CR UIBE2 NN NN NN CN RR RR RR UIBE4 NN NN NN FN RR RR RR UofM2 NN NN NN CN RR RR FR Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 24 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Information Table (for practice): payo if n of other 9 subjects withdraw r = 1.43 n payo if withdraw payo if leave money in the bank 1.43 2. 1 1.43 1.9 2 1.43 1.79 3 1.43 1.63 4 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.14 6 1.43.71 7 1.2. 8 1.11. 9 1.. Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 2 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Best response with inertia If withdraw early and receive 1.43, not know whether z t 1 > z,! inertia (withdraw early) If withdraw early and receive < 1.43, know z t 1 < z,! best response (withdraw early) If withdraw late, know whether z t 1 > z,! best response (withdraw late i z t 1 > z ) Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 26 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Prob of experimentation If withdraw early & receive < 1.43, or withdraw late & receive >,! know z t 1, prob depends on (η, z t 1 ) Otherwise, prob depends on η Estimate three probabilities Prob of changing from early to late withdrawal δ i el (z t 1, η) if informed of z t 1 ; δ u el (η) otherwise. Prob of changing from late to early withdrawal: δ le (z t 1, η). Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 27 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Estimate the prob of experimentation using experimental data Table : Observations for Logit Regression # of Obs. # of Exp. Exp. Rate (%) s b = e Informed 1824 149 8.17 Uninformed 336 18 32.1 s b = ` Informed 288 31 1.8 s b :strategy choice resulting from best response Total number of observations = 4: 8 sessions x 1 subjects x 7 situations x 9 observations for each subject Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 28 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Table 6: Early to Late (informed): logit (δ i el ) = α + α 1 (z t 1 z ) Coe cient Standard Error. t-statistic p-value z t 1 z.1.4 13.93. Constant.74.22 3.3. Table 7: Early to Late (uninformed): logit (δ u el ) = β + β 1 η Coe cient Standard Error. t-statistic p-value η -2.74.62-4.43. Constant 1.3.41 2.49.1 Table 8: Late to Early: logit (δ le ) = γ + γ 1 (z t 1 z ) Coe cient Standard Error. t-statistic p-value z t 1 z -.24.7-3.4. Constant -3.4.4-7.1. Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 29 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Simulation Same parameters as in the experiments: 1 players, 7 phases, each phase has 1 rounds Adopt endogenous evolutionary algorithm, use estimated prob of experimentation Use z for each of the 8 sessions Simulate for 1 times Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 3 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Simulation.1.2.3..7.8.9 NN 1 1 1 98 41 FN 2 26 CN SFU1 H 1 RR 7 99 FR 1 21 1 CR 19 4 L 3 Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 31 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Simulation.1.2.3..7.8.9 NN 1 1 1 7 1 FN 29 3 CN 1 2 UIBE1 H 3 RR 1 7 99 FR 2 21 1 CR 3 4 L 12 Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 32 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Simulation.1.2.3..7.8.9 NN 1 99 1 9 3 FN 1 1 6 CN UIBE3 H 6 RR 63 1 FR 11 3 CR 6 6 L 14 1 Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 33 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Simulation.1.2.3..7.8.9 NN 1 1 98 9 3 FN 2 1 6 CN UofM1 H 6 RR 8 1 FR 11 13 CR 6 2 L 14 Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 34 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Simulation.1.2.3..7.8.9 NN 1 1 1 98 1 FN 2 3 CN 2 SFU2 H 3 RR 1 8 1 FR 2 13 CR 3 2 L 12 Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 3 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Simulation.1.2.3..7.8.9 NN 1 1 97 3 FN 3 36 CN 9 1 UIBE2 H 1 RR 42 8 99 FR 42 13 1 CR 6 2 L 9 Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 36 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Simulation.1.2.3..7.8.9 NN 1 1 1 29 FN 6 CN UIBE4 H 1 RR 61 7 99 FR 29 21 1 CR 6 4 L 4 Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 37 / 43

Modi ed Evolutionary Algorithm Simulation.1.2.3..7.8.9 NN 1 1 97 3 FN 3 36 CN 9 1 UofM2 H 1 RR 42 8 9 FR 42 13 1 CR 6 2 L 9 Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 38 / 43

The Decision Screen Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 39 / 43

The Payo Screen Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 4 / 43

Table (for practice): payo if n of other 9 subjects withdraw r = 1.43 n payo if withdraw payo if leave money in the bank 1.43 2. 1 1.43 1.9 2 1.43 1.79 3 1.43 1.63 4 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.14 6 1.43.71 7 1.2. 8 1.11. 9 1.. Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 41 / 43

Literature: Experimental Studies of Coordination Games Van Huyck et al (199, 1991): number of subjects. Battalio et al (21): Cabrales et al (27): payo di erential between eqa. Heinemann et al (24), Du y and Ochs (21): how individual strategies respond to a continually changing payo relevant variable that causes both the di culty of coordination and the payo di erential to change. Heinemann et al (29): how individual strategies change wrt payo di erence between eqa, and how the relationship is a ected by coordination requirement. Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 42 / 43

Compare with Literature on Experimental Studies of Coordination Games Our paper: Whether bank runs can occur as result of pure coordination failures: the experimental setup in our paper is more proper for the purpose Systematic study of how aggregate economy responds to coordination requirement Capture a stronger learning e ect for intermediate coordination requirement Arifovic, Jiang and Xu Bank () Runs as Pure Coordination Failures August 11, 211 43 / 43