Retirement Lockboxes. William F. Sharpe Stanford University. CFA Society of San Francisco January 31, 2008

Similar documents
Lockbox Separation. William F. Sharpe June, 2007

Payout-Phase of Mandatory Pension Accounts

Retirement. Optimal Asset Allocation in Retirement: A Downside Risk Perspective. JUne W. Van Harlow, Ph.D., CFA Director of Research ABSTRACT

LIFECYCLE INVESTING : DOES IT MAKE SENSE

Alpha, Beta, and Now Gamma

Are Managed-Payout Funds Better than Annuities?

Vanguard s approach to target-date funds

Beyond Modern Portfolio Theory to Modern Investment Technology. Contingent Claims Analysis and Life-Cycle Finance. December 27, 2007.

PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER

A Robust Quantitative Framework Can Help Plan Sponsors Manage Pension Risk Through Glide Path Design.

Optimal Withdrawal Strategy for Retirement Income Portfolios

Sustainable Spending for Retirement

Nearly optimal asset allocations in retirement

Defined contribution retirement plan design and the role of the employer default

No Portfolio is an Island

Asset Allocation: Projecting a Glide Path

Determining a Realistic Withdrawal Amount and Asset Allocation in Retirement

CFA Level III - LOS Changes

How Much Can Clients Spend in Retirement? A Test of the Two Most Prominent Approaches By Wade Pfau December 10, 2013

No Portfolio is an Island

Advanced Financial Modeling. Unit 2

Observations on Heterogeneity in Target-Date Funds and the Pension Protection Act of 2006

Econ Financial Markets Spring 2011 Professor Robert Shiller. Final Exam Practice Exam Suggested Solution

Are Your Risk Tolerance and LDI Glide Path in Sync?

Initial Conditions and Optimal Retirement Glide Paths

Target Date Glide Paths: BALANCING PLAN SPONSOR GOALS 1

Combined Accumulation- and Decumulation-Plans with Risk-Controlled Capital Protection

The case for professional financial advice

Achieving Sustainable Retirement Withdrawals: A Combined Equity and Annuity Approach

Safe Withdrawal Rates from your Retirement Portfolio

The Leverage Cycle. John Geanakoplos

Domestic and international equities

Irrigation in the Zambezi River Basin: Flexibility under Climate Uncertainty

Plan Demographics, Participants Saving Behavior, and Target-Date Fund Investments By Youngkyun Park, EBRI

Why Advisors Should Use Deferred-Income Annuities

Portfolio Management & Analysis

Behavioral Finance and Asset Pricing

One Change in Environment: Taxes Exist and Distribution Strategies in Retirement Matter

Understanding the Principles of Investment Planning Stochastic Modelling/Tactical & Strategic Asset Allocation

Chapter 2: The Asset Allocation Decision

The value of managed account advice

Rationale. Learning about return and risk from the historical record and beta estimation. T Bills and Inflation

Option Pricing Models. c 2013 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 205

Cash Flows on Options strike or exercise price

The 4% Rule: Does Real Estate Make a Difference?

Using Fixed SPIAs and Investments to Create an Inflation-Adjusted Income Stream

How Older People Behave

Motif Capital Horizon Models: A robust asset allocation framework

Comments on File Number S (Investment Company Advertising: Target Date Retirement Fund Names and Marketing)

The value of financial advice for Australian retirees

Alpha, Beta, and Now Gamma

BlackRock. LifePath Index Funds. An index-based Target Date approach, designed to help keep retirement savings on track

THE 4% RULE AT WHAT PRICE?

Comparing a Bucket Strategy and a Systematic Withdrawal Strategy

Finance Science, Financial Innovation and Long-Term Asset Management

Synchronize Your Risk Tolerance and LDI Glide Path.

Social Security Reform: How Benefits Compare March 2, 2005 National Press Club

SOCIAL SECURITY STRATEGIES:

Glide Path Style Analysis and Benchmarks for the Target Maturity Industry

Secure Your Retirement

Retirement Saving, Annuity Markets, and Lifecycle Modeling. James Poterba 10 July 2008

READING 26: HEDGING MOTGAGE SECURITIES TO CAPTURE RELATIVE VALUE

Minimizing Timing Luck with Portfolio Tranching The Difference Between Hired and Fired

Deferred income annuities

Assessment Asset Allocation Investment Strategies Monitor and Review

The Welfare Cost of Asymmetric Information: Evidence from the U.K. Annuity Market

Vanguard research August 2015

Improving Withdrawal Rates in a Low-Yield World

CHAPTER 5. Introduction to Risk, Return, and the Historical Record INVESTMENTS BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

USING DEFINED MATURITY BOND FUNDS AND QLACs TO BETTER MANAGE RETIREMENT RISKS

A powerful combination: Target-date funds and managed accounts

Optimal Portfolios under a Value at Risk Constraint

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Funds: Methodology and Design

The Diversification of Employee Stock Options

Target-Date Glide Paths: Balancing Plan Sponsor Goals 1

Vanguard Global Capital Markets Model

RBC retirement income planning process

Growth-indexed bonds and Debt distribution: Theoretical benefits and Practical limits

Insights CLIENT. Out Of Sequence. Sequence risk is getting the right returns at the wrong time. Getting The Right Returns At The Wrong Time

Alpha, Beta, and Now Gamma

OBAA OBJECTIVES-BASED ASSET ALLOCATION TRULY EFFECTIVE ASSET ALLOCATION FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES DOES YOUR PORTFOLIO SUPPORT YOUR BUSINESS OBJECTIVES?

Brooks, Introductory Econometrics for Finance, 3rd Edition

Managing the Uncertainty: An Approach to Private Equity Modeling

CHAPTER 5. Introduction to Risk, Return, and the Historical Record INVESTMENTS BODIE, KANE, MARCUS. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Coping with Sequence Risk: How Variable Withdrawal and Annuitization Improve Retirement Outcomes

Risk Neutral Valuation, the Black-

Attractive option for college saving

Comment on Target Date Fund Rules to SEC/ DOL

Tuomo Lampinen Silicon Cloud Technologies LLC

Dynamic Asset and Liability Management Models for Pension Systems

Thoughts on Asset Allocation Global China Roundtable (GCR) Beijing CITICS CITADEL Asset Management.

HEDGE FUNDS & ABSOLUTE RETURN STRATEGIES IN A LONG-TERM PORTFOLIO.

EFFECT OF IMPLEMENTATION TIME ON REAL OPTIONS VALUATION. Mehmet Aktan

The histogram should resemble the uniform density, the mean should be close to 0.5, and the standard deviation should be close to 1/ 12 =

Collective Defined Contribution Plan Contest Model Overview

Cat Food or Caviar: Sustainable Withdrawal Rates in Retirement

Five key factors to help improve retirement outcomes for target date strategy investors

Are the American Future Elderly Prepared?

Model Calibration and Hedging

Outline. Decision Making Theory and Homeland Security. Readings. AGEC689: Economic Issues and Policy Implications of Homeland Security

Transcription:

Retirement Lockboxes William F. Sharpe Stanford University CFA Society of San Francisco January 31, 2008

Based on work with: Jason Scott and John Watson Financial Engines Center for Retirement Research For more, see Post-retirement Economics at www.wsharpe.com

The Prototypical Problem An individual or family has W dollars to finance retirement and Must choose a Retirement Financial Strategy, which includes decisions about: Investment Spending Annuitization

Technologies Needed to find the Best Strategy Asset Pricing Theory Behavioral Economics Financial Engineering Operations Research

A Retirement Lockbox Strategy An analytical approach Can provide greater clarity about the characteristics of traditional retirement financial strategies An actual approach Can be tailored to provide better results for some retirees Can provide better discipline to deal with problems associated with declining mental acuity

A Retirement Lockbox

Retirement Lockbox Characteristics Owner Bill Sharpe Maturity Date 2020 Iniital Investment $ 20,000 Investment Strategy 60% Stocks, 40% Bonds, Rebalance annually Beneficiary Monterey Institute of International Studies

Types of Retirement Lockboxes Bequest Beneficiary gets the box if the owner is dead before the maturity date Annuity An insurance company : gets the box if the owner is dead before the maturity date manages the investment strategy matches the ending value in a pre-specified ratio if the owner is alive at the maturity date

A Retirement Lockbox Strategy.........

Individuals Performance When Making Financial Decisions Agarwal, Sumit, Driscoll, John C., Gabaix, Xavier and Laibson, David I., "The Age of Reason: Financial Decisions Over the Lifecycle" (June 7, 2007). MIT Department of Economics Working Paper No. 07-11 :

Home Equity Loan Interest Rates "The Age of Reason: Financial Decisions Over the Lifecycle"

The Age of Peak Performance Age of Peak Performance Estimate +/- Standard Error 80 70 60 50 Age 40 30 20 10 0 Home Equity Loans - APR Home Equity Lines - APR Eureka Moment Credit Card - APR Auto Loans - APR Mortgage - APR Small Business Credit Card - APR Credit Card Late Fee Credit Card Over Limit Fee Credit Card Cash Advance Fee Task "The Age of Reason: Financial Decisions Over the Lifecycle"

Two periods Now Next year The Simplest Possible Risky Capital Market Two future states of the world The market is up The market is down Two securities A riskless real bond A portfolio of risky securities in market proportions

Capital Market Characteristics Bond 1.02 u 0 1.00 prob = 0.50 prob = 0.50 1.02 d Market Portfolio 1.18 u 0 1.00 prob = 0.50 prob = 0.50 0.94 d

Desired Spending Spending 55.80 u 0 50.00 prob = 0.50 prob = 0.50 48.60 d

Wealth, Financial Strategy and Desired Spending W B0 M0 x 100 20 30 s C 1-1 -1 50.00 S0 0 1.02 1.18 55.80 Su 0 1.02 0.94 48.60 Sd

Initial Wealth W B0 M0 x 100 20 30 s C 1-1 -1 50.00 S0 0 1.02 1.18 55.80 Su 0 1.02 0.94 48.60 Sd

Bond Investment W B0 M0 x 100 20 30 s C 1-1 -1 50.00 S0 0 1.02 1.18 55.80 Su 0 1.02 0.94 48.60 Sd

Market Portfolio Investment W B0 M0 x 100 20 30 s C 1-1 -1 50.00 S0 0 1.02 1.18 55.80 Su 0 1.02 0.94 48.60 Sd

Wealth, Financial Strategy, Capital Markets and Spending Initial Wealth Financial Strategy W B0 M0 x 100 20 30 s C 1-1 -1 50.00 S0 0 1.02 1.18 55.80 Su 0 1.02 0.94 48.60 Sd Capital Market Characteristics Spending

Decisions Spending Cx = s W B0 M0 x 100 20 30 s C 1-1 -1 50.00 S0 0 1.02 1.18 55.80 Su 0 1.02 0.94 48.60 Sd

Spending Decisions x = C -1 s W B0 M0 x 100 20 30 s C 1-1 -1 50.00 S0 0 1.02 1.18 55.80 Su 0 1.02 0.94 48.60 Sd

Lockbox, Period 1 W B0 M0 x1 50 20 30 s1 C 1-1 -1 0.00 0 1.02 1.18 55.80 0 1.02 0.94 48.60

Desired Spending: Multiple Periods 0 50.00 55.60 u 63.84 uu 53.76 ud 49.20 d 52.80 du 47.04 dd

Dynamic Strategies W B0 M0 Bu Mu Bd Md x 150.00 40.00 60.00 14.00 42.00 24.00 24.00 s C 1-1 -1 0 0 0 0 50.00 S0 0 1.02 1.18-1 -1 0 0 55.60 Su 0 1.02 0.94 0 0-1 -1 49.20 Sd 0 0 0 1.02 1.18 0 0 63.84 Suu 0 0 0 1.02 0.94 0 0 53.76 Sud 0 0 0 0 0 1.02 1.18 52.80 Sdu 0 0 0 0 0 1.02 0.94 47.04 Sdd

Contingent Bond Purchases W B0 M0 Bu Mu Bd Md x 150.00 40.00 60.00 14.00 42.00 24.00 24.00 s C 1-1 -1 0 0 0 0 50.00 S0 0 1.02 1.18-1 -1 0 0 55.60 Su 0 1.02 0.94 0 0-1 -1 49.20 Sd 0 0 0 1.02 1.18 0 0 63.84 Suu 0 0 0 1.02 0.94 0 0 53.76 Sud 0 0 0 0 0 1.02 1.18 52.80 Sdu 0 0 0 0 0 1.02 0.94 47.04 Sdd

Contingent Market Portfolio Purchases W B0 M0 Bu Mu Bd Md x 150.00 40.00 60.00 14.00 42.00 24.00 24.00 s C 1-1 -1 0 0 0 0 50.00 S0 0 1.02 1.18-1 -1 0 0 55.60 Su 0 1.02 0.94 0 0-1 -1 49.20 Sd 0 0 0 1.02 1.18 0 0 63.84 Suu 0 0 0 1.02 0.94 0 0 53.76 Sud 0 0 0 0 0 1.02 1.18 52.80 Sdu 0 0 0 0 0 1.02 0.94 47.04 Sdd

Lockbox, Period 2 W B0 M0 Bu Mu Bd Md x 49.67 16.34 33.33 14.00 42.00 24.00 24.00 s inv(c) 1-1 -1 0 0 0 0 0.00 S0 0 1.02 1.18-1 -1 0 0 0.00 Su 0 1.02 0.94 0 0-1 -1 0.00 Sd 0 0 0 1.02 1.18 0 0 63.84 Suu 0 0 0 1.02 0.94 0 0 53.76 Sud 0 0 0 0 0 1.02 1.18 52.80 Sdu 0 0 0 0 0 1.02 0.94 47.04 Sdd

Lockbox Separation (1) A retirement financial strategy is fully specified if spending in each year can be determined for any scenario of market returns A market is complete if any desired spending plan can be implemented with a retirement financial strategy If the market is complete, any fully specified retirement financial strategy can be implemented with a lockbox strategy

Lockbox Separation (2) If a market is not complete it may or may not be possible to implement a given retirement financial plan with a lockbox strategy or, if there is a comparable lockbox strategy it may incur added expense But many popular retirement financial plans have equal-cost lockbox counterparts Prime examples are the Fidelity Income Replacement Funds

The Fidelity Income Replacement Funds Horizon date E.g. 2036 Investment strategy Time-dependent glide path asset allocation Spending Rule Pre-specified time-dependent proportions of asset value

Fund Characteristics (from prospectus) The Income Replacement Funds are designed for investors who seek to convert accumulated assets into regular payments over a defined period of time The payment strategy for each Income Replacement Fund is designed to be implemented through a shareholder s voluntary participation in the Smart Payment Program SM Each Income Replacement Fund s investment objective is intended to support the Smart Payment Program s payment strategy The income Replacement Funds are not designed for the accumulation of assets prior to retirement [but they] do not provide a complete solution for a shareholder s retirement income needs.

Spending Rule Annual Target Payment Rates 100 90 80 Perent of Fund Spent 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Years to Horizon

Investment Strategy

Lockbox Equivalence Any strategy with a time-dependent proportional spending rule and a time-dependent investment strategy is equivalent to a lockbox strategy Each lockbox will have the same investment strategy and The initial amounts to be invested in the lockboxes can be computed from the pre-specified spending rates

Initial Lockbox Values (1) Let: K t = the proportion spent in year t R t = the total return on investment in year t (e.g. 1.02 for 2%) The amounts spent in the first three years will be: Wk 0 (1-k 0 )WR 1 k 1 (1-k 0 )WR 1 (1-k 1 ) R 2 k 2

Initial Lockbox Values (2) Re-arranging: {Wk 0 } {W(1-k 0 )k 1 } R 1 {W(1-k 0 )(1-k 1 )k 2 } R 1 R 2 But these are the ending values for lockboxes with the initial investments shown in the brackets { } investing these amounts in lockboxes will give the same spending plan as the original strategy

Percentages of Initial Wealth in Lockboxes 6.0% 5.0% Percent of Initial Wealth Wealth 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Lockbox Year

Rover: a Simple Income Replacement Fund Two assets A riskless real bond A market portfolio (e.g. 60% Stocks, 40% Bonds) A glide path similar to that for equity funds in the Fidelity Income Replacement Funds A 30-year horizon Annual payment rates equal to those of the Fidelity Income Replacement Funds

Rover: Investment Strategy 100% 90% 80% Percent in Market Portfolio 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Time to Horizon Date

Rover: Percentages of Initial Wealth in Lockboxes 6.0% 5.0% Percent of Initial Wealth Wealth 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Lockbox Year

Capital Market Characteristics Riskless real return 2 % per year Market portfolio real return Lognormally distributed each year Expected annual return 6 % per year Annual standard deviation of return 12 % per year No serial correlation from year to year

Monte Carlo Simulations 10,000 scenarios of 30 years each Returns for each lockbox are simulated Results are the same as those for the original strategy The original set of scenarios is then used to evaluate alternative strategies

Rover: Spending in Year 30 per dollar invested in lockbox

Rover: Spending in Year 30: Strategy versus Market

Market Risk and Path Risk Market risk Uncertainty about return due to uncertainty about cumulative market return Path risk Uncertainty about return due to uncertainty about the path market returns will take In this setting, only market risk is rewarded with higher expected return

Minimizing Path Risk Sort all 10,000 amounts to be spent in the year from highest to lowest Construct a strategy with the highest return in the scenario with the highest cumulative market return, the next highest return in the scenario with the next highest market return, and so on. This equal-distribution market strategy will have precisely the same distribution of spending with minimum path risk

Rover: Spending in Year 30: Two Strategies versus Market

The Equal-distribution Market Strategy Provides returns almost the same as those from a constant-mix strategy rebalanced annually to give 71% in the market portfolio 29% in the riskless bond But it is cheaper to obtain these results since only market risk is taken Following such a constant-mix strategy with the funds in the lockbox will produce higher returns In this case, over 11% better

Rover: Spending in Year 30: Three Strategies versus Market

Rover: Spending in Year 30: Glide Path versus Constant Mix

An Alternative Strategy Each lockbox follows a constant mix strategy The proportions invested in the market portfolio differ among boxes Boxes for later dates have more conservative asset allocations The distribution of outcomes for each year will be better than that for the original strategy But the improvements will be greater for boxes with later dates

Is the Alternative Strategy Better? Probably for most retirees But it can provide more variation in spending from year to year

Percent Change in Spending for Two Strategies: Year 29 to Year 30

The Ultimate Goal To find the best retirement financial plan for a given retiree or retiree family This will depend on Capital market characteristics Personal preferences

Finding an Optimal Retirement Financial Strategy Maximize: H(s) Subject to: x(1) = W x = C -1 s where H(s) is the investor s happiness with spending plan s

Happiness and Future Spending If a strategy determined today is to be followed without change, the appropriate objective is to maximize the happiness a retiree gets today from contemplating future spending when he or she may be ill or have diminished mental capacity Such a strategy allows a retiree to act in loco parentis for his or her future (possibly dimished) self Key is representing a retiree s personal preferences adequately

Personal Preferences and Retirement Lockboxes Economists have an approach to formulating personal preferences in terms of utility functions The goal is to maximize expected utility, taking probabilities of states of the world into account Much more work needs to be done to adapt this framework to help solve the retirement financial problem But it is likely that lockboxes can help as analytic constructs and, in some cases, in practice

Are There Retirement Lockboxes in Your Future?.........