Job/Survey. City of Bellingham Client Service Name: Priorities and Customer Satisfaction Survey. Pamela Jull, PhD. October 2008

Similar documents
CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE Citizen Survey. Survey conducted by Prairie Research Associates May 2017

City of Lethbridge 2014 Community Satisfaction Survey. Key Findings August 2014

City of San Rafael: 2011 City Satisfaction Survey Topline Report March 2011

Community Survey Results

Citizen Satisfaction Survey Data

Citizen Budget Budget Consultation Online Summary Report. November 25, Overview:

2016 Citizen Satisfaction Survey

2016 Citizen Satisfaction Survey

2018 Spring Pulse Survey Overview

2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey

Rapid City. Citizen Budget Priority Survey. February 2018

Telephone Survey in the City of Mercer Island n=304, Margin of Error = ± 5.7 Points Conducted April 6 th - 9 th, 2014 EMC Research #

Ann Arbor, MI Comparisons by Demographic Subgroups 2018

Saanich Citizen and Business Surveys 2015 February 2015

The National Citizen Survey 2004

City of Port Moody Citizen Survey. Presented by: Catherine Knaus, Ipsos Reid

Charlottesville, VA. Supplemental Online Survey Results

Citizen s Perspective

AMO Presentation, London, August 2014

2018 Boise Citizen Survey

The National Citizen Survey

Thornton Annual Citizen survey

2015 DataHaven Community Wellbeing Survey Danbury, CT Crosstabs

2015 DataHaven Community Wellbeing Survey Greater New Britain (Community Foundation of Greater New Britain Region) Crosstabs

QUALITY OF LIFE AND COMMUNITY

CITY OF NAPA PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT. John Coates, Parks and Recreation Services Director

1001 Lindsay Street Chattanooga, Tennessee (423) FAX: (423)

Key Findings From Survey and Focus Group Research

Durham City and County Resident Survey

Key Findings of a Survey Conducted: May 14 22, A- Attach 1- PPT Presentation Page 1 of 52

2015 DataHaven Community Wellbeing Survey Greater New Haven Crosstabs

2015 Town of Oakville Citizen Survey Presentation of Findings. February 23, 2015

Section 3: Importance-Satisfaction Analysis

[ ] Pinellas County Citizen Research: Telephonic Study of Citizen Values. CLIENT: Pinellas County CONTACT: Sarah Lindemuth

City of Austin, Minnesota 2018 Performance Measurements Survey Summaries & Pie Charts

Importance-Satisfaction Analysis

Matching Science with Insight. Citizen Satisfaction Survey

New Braunfels, TX. Technical Appendices DRAFT 2017

City of Mercer Island. February First Avenue Suite 451 Seattle, WA (206)

AB 5169 Exhibit 1 Page 2. City of Mercer Island Telephone Survey April 2016

Survey Conducted: November 28 - December 3,

The National Citizen Survey

Morristown, TN Supplemental Online Survey Results

Arvada, Colorado. Citizen Survey. Report of Results October Prepared by:

Rothesay Citizen Satisfaction Study

BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA

The City of Dallas, Texas

The National Citizen Survey

City of Roseville City Manager Recommended 2017 Budget. July 18, 2016

CITY OF DE PERE CITY SERVICES STUDY 2014 CONDUCTED BY THE ST. NORBERT COLLEGE STRATEGIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Resident Strategic Plan Input Report

Boynton Beach Business Survey. Phillip Downs, Ph.D Joseph St. Germain, Ph.D Rachael Anglin Isiah Lewis Glencora Haskins

FINDINGS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE 2014

2955 Valmont Road, Suite North Capitol Street NE, Suite 500 Boulder, CO Washington, DC 20002

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS. City of Madras 2016

City of Tacoma, WA Citizen Survey Report of Results

City of Sugar Land Community Survey. Prepared by:

2017 Citizen Survey. Prepared for the City of Kelowna by: Final Report October 31, 2017

City of Tacoma. Community Survey Key Findings. MDB Insight. February, Presented by

The National Citizen Survey

The National Citizen Survey

2017 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Final Report

CITY OF PORTLAND SERVICE EFFORTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

The National Citizen Survey

The National Citizen Survey

2955 Valmont Road Suite North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado Washington, DC n-r-c.com icma.

Calgary Police Commission. Annual Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report

City of Kelowna Citizen Survey

FY Budget Outlook. City Council Briefing December 3, 2014

The National Citizen Survey

Sarasota County. Citizen Opinion Survey

City of Alamosa Customer Satisfaction and Residents Priorities Survey October Final Descriptive Results

City of Lawrence Page 1 Strategic Plan Performance Measures

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Attachment A

Local Decisions have created Texas cities where people want to

City of Philadelphia Fiscal Year 2009 Proposed Operating Budget

2018 Budget Planning Survey General Population Survey Results

S1. Our study is interested in the opinions of certain age groups. Could you please tell me your age as of your last birthday?

CITY OF SALEM FINANCIAL SUMMARY

Driving Habits Questionnaire (DHQ) Please cite the questionnaire as follows:

The National Citizen Survey

May City of Yellowknife Citizen Survey

Charlottesville Virginia. Smart and Efficient Government Community Value of Services and Delivery

Seattle Community Power Works

Survey Conducted: December 4-10,

2019 Town of Oakville Citizen Survey Presentation of Findings. April 2, 2019

Strategic Plan

Expenditures & Revenue Summary by Category

Downtown Boulder User Survey October 2014

Business Plan Development Workshop. July 11, 2006

City Budgets City Services: Finding a Balance. June 3,

Ontario Survey Summary submitted by Nanos to the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), July 2018 (Submission )

June Quality of Life Survey. Comparing Survey Results From to 2017

Budget 2015 Engagement. Nov. 24, 2014

Survey Conducted: August 6-15,

Page two 2012 National Citizen Survey Summary Memo January 9, 2013

09/03/2016 Communicating on Infrastructure Investments in Calgary

Measure O Citizens Oversight Committee. Presenter: Ashley Golden, Assistant City Manager Date: January 24, 2019

ACTION STRATEGIES. Aurora Places is the guidebook

City of Manassas, Virginia Planning Commission Meeting AGENDA. Work Session

Transcription:

City of Bellingham Client Service Name: Priorities and Customer Satisfaction Survey Job/Survey October 2008 Pamela Jull, PhD www.arnorthwest.com 1-888-647-6067

Introduction Background

Introduction Background Previous surveys done of Registered Voters only

Introduction Background Previous surveys done of Registered Voters only Interest in trending

Introduction Background Previous surveys done of Registered Voters only Interest in trending Interest in addressing emerging issues

Methods Survey Characteristics

Methods Survey Characteristics 74 items, including 2 open ended questions

Methods Survey Characteristics 74 items, including 2 open ended questions Average time 15 minutes

Methods Survey Characteristics 74 items, including 2 open ended questions Average time 15 minutes 600 completes with error margin ±4%

Methods Survey Characteristics 74 items, including 2 open ended questions Average time 15 minutes 600 completes with error margin ±4% 38% response rate (3 attempts/household)

Methods Survey Characteristics 74 items, including 2 open ended questions Average time 15 minutes 600 completes with error margin ±4% 38% response rate (3 attempts/household) Open to all city residents (RDD sample)

Methods Strengths and weaknesses Good response rate

Methods Strengths and weaknesses Good response rate Demographic diversity

Methods Strengths and weaknesses Good response rate Demographic diversity Efficient margin of error

Methods Strengths and weaknesses Good response rate Demographic diversity Efficient margin of error Efficient methodology

Methods Strengths and weaknesses RDD methods excludes cell-phone-only households

Methods Strengths and weaknesses RDD methods excludes cell-phone-only households Mix of old and new survey questions challenging

Findings Analysis includes: Households with children vs. those without Length of time living in Bellingham Age Renters vs. Owners Income

Findings Quality of Life: Asked all three years

Findings: Bellingham Quality of Life Figure 1. Overall, how would you rate the quality of life in Bellingham? (n=599) Only fair 8% Poor 2% Excellent 41% Good 49%

Findings: Bellingham Quality of Life 2008 (n=599) 2 8 49 41 2006 (n=510) 1 5 46 48 2004 (n=513) 1 7 43 49 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Poor Only fair Good Excellent

Findings: Quality of life What do you think is the most important problem facing Bellingham today that city leaders can do something about?

Findings: Quality of life What do you think is the most important problem facing Bellingham today that city leaders can do something about? Open ended question

Findings: Bellingham Quality of Life Table 2. What do you think is the most important problem facing Bellingham today that city leaders can do something about? (n=585) N % Improper Growth: Growing too large/overpopulated 86 16 Traffic 60 11 Growth (General) 50 9 Police: Crime/Safety 39 7 Drinking Water/Watershed 38 7 Politics: Decision Making/Better City Officials 32 6 Creating/keeping/finding jobs 31 6 Planning for growth/sprawl 27 5 Attract business/industry 25 5 Help Environment 25 5 Top ten responses shown

Findings: City performance ratings Satisfaction with city performance Planning for growth Protecting the livability of neighborhoods Using tax dollars responsibly Protecting the environment Meeting community needs

Findings: City Performance Ratings Figure 2. Satisfaction with the City of Bellingham Protecting the environment (n=579) 7 25 55 13 Protecting the livability of neighborhoods (n=588) 10 33 49 7 Meeting community needs (n=580) 10 32 53 5 Using tax dollars responsibly (n=534) 16 34 45 4 Planning for growth (n=553) 24 41 32 3 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Poor Only fair Good Excellent

Findings: City Performance Ratings Table X. Satisfaction with the City: Ratings across time Meeting community needs Protecting the livability of neighborhoods Planning for growth 2004 2006 2008 2006 2008 2006 2008 Excellent 13 7 5 7 7 4 3 Good 44 43 52 42 49 26 30 Only fair 30 34 31 31 32 36 38 Poor 9 10 10 15 10 30 22 (Don't know) 3 6 3 5 2 4 7

Findings: Priority and success of city efforts I'm going to read you a list of items that the City of Bellingham COULD spend tax dollars on. For each item, please tell me how high a priority that item should be

Findings: Priority and success of city efforts I'm going to read you a list of items that the City of Bellingham COULD spend tax dollars on. For each item, please tell me how high a priority that item should be 13 areas to rate Low, moderate, high or very high Presented in random order

Findings: Priority and success of city efforts Now I'm going to ask you to rate the job the City of Bellingham is doing in providing services that rely on tax-payer dollars

Findings: Priority and success of city efforts Now I'm going to ask you to rate the job the City of Bellingham is doing in providing services that rely on tax-payer dollars Same 13 areas to rate Excellent, good, only fair, poor Presented in random order

Findings: Priority and Success of City Efforts Figure 7. Priority and Success Quadrants 3.4 Mean Score: Success Rating.. 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 Parks Arts and Culture Rec Programs Economic Dev Library Environment (human impact) Streets Environment (development) Comm. with citizens Involving the public Fire Medic One Preventing crime 2.0 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Mean Score: Priority

Findings: Budget and taxes If you had to choose only one, which would you choose for the City of Bellingham?

Findings: Budget and taxes If you had to choose only one, which would you choose for the City of Bellingham? Increase taxes and fees to maintain city services at current levels to keep up with inflation and citizens demand for services, or

Findings: Budget and taxes If you had to choose only one, which would you choose for the City of Bellingham? Increase taxes and fees to maintain city services at current levels to keep up with inflation and citizens demand for services, or Keep taxes and fees the same and cut existing services

Findings: Budget and taxes If you had to choose only one, which would you choose for the City of Bellingham? Increase taxes and fees to maintain city services at current levels to keep up with inflation and citizens demand for services, or Keep taxes and fees the same and cut existing services Asked in 2004, 2006 and 2008

Findings: Budget and Taxes Figure 8. Which would you choose for the City of Bellingham? (n=564)

Findings: Budget and Taxes 2008 (n=598) 3 5 5 35 52 2006 (n=510) 5 4 5 42 44 2004 (n=513) 4 3 4 33 56 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Other) (Neither) (Don't Know) Cut services Increase taxes

Findings: Budget and taxes What services to cut? Culture/Arts Parks and recreation Administration/salaries

Findings: Priority and Success of City Efforts Figure 7. Priority and Success Quadrants 3.4 Mean Score: Success Rating.. 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 Parks Arts and Culture Rec Programs Economic Dev Library Environment (human impact) Streets Environment (development) Comm. with citizens Involving the public Fire Medic One Preventing crime 2.0 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Mean Score: Priority

Findings BTV10 and COB.org 70% knew of BTV10 54% knew of COB.org No change in either since 2006

Findings: BTV10 Figure 10. Frequency of watching BTV10. (n=419)

Findings: BTV10 Figure 11. How often were you tuning in to watch a City Council meeting? (n=295)

Findings: City Website Figure 12. Frequency of visiting cob.org. (n=326)

Findings: Environment Importance of four actions Reducing automobile trips by improving transit, bicycle and pedestrian choices Promoting the use of renewable energy such as green and solar power. Preventing further development in the Lake Whatcom watershed to protect our drinking water. Creating a plan to reduce dependence on oil and respond to an oil supply crisis.

Findings: Environment Figure 13. Environmental actions Protect drinking water 3 4 13 36 44 Promote renewable energy 4 6 19 34 37 Reduce auto trips 4 4 22 35 36 Reduce oil dependence 6 7 17 34 35 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Not at all Not very Somewhat Very Extremely

Findings Safety Based on questions from the City of Portland Used a modified scale not perfectly comparable Day and night Neighborhood, parks & downtown

Findings: Safety Figure 14. Safety ratings

Findings Neighborhood ratings Based on questions from the City of Portland Used a modified scale not perfectly comparable

Findings: Neighborhood Ratings Figure 16. Neighborhood ratings

Findings: Neighborhood Streets Figure 17. Ratings of neighborhood streets, sorted by ratings of excellent

Conclusion Residents mostly pleased with quality of life in Bellingham High marks for key priority areas Most residents showed willingness to pay more to maintain services Environmental issues important to residents Questions?

www.arnorthwest.com 1-888-647-6067 End Slide