Backtesting. Introduction

Similar documents
Backtesting. Introduction

Margin Methodology. Margin Overview. There are two main elements to the overall margin liability. Initial Margin. Variation Margin

Margin Collateral Framework

Validation of Nasdaq Clearing Models

Default Fund and Stress Testing

Matching Rules. Defined Terms

Guidance consultation FSA REVIEWS OF CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT BY CCPS. Financial Services Authority. July Dear Sirs

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES. For the quarter ended March 31, 2016

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES

Please respond to: LME Clear Market Risk Risk Management Department

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES. For the quarter ended March 31, 2014

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES. For the quarter ended September 30, 2015

Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM) How to validate a global regulatory risk model

ESMA, EBA, EIOPA Consultation Paper on Initial and Variation Margin rules for Uncleared OTC Derivatives

Content. International and legal framework Mandate Structure of the draft RTS References Annex

Clearing Capital at Risk ( CCaR ) Model at NASDAQ OMX. Model Validation 2016

Overview of ASX Energy Initial Margins

Annex 8. I. Definition of terms

Razor Risk Market Risk Overview

Comments on the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision s Consultative Document Fundamental review of the trading book: outstanding issues

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (Release No ; File Nos. SR-DTC ; SR-FICC ; SR-NSCC )

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

JSE CLEAR. IOSCO Disclosure Document. 11 April 2017

Margin Requirements for Non-Centrally Cleared Derivatives

Initial Margin Back-testing

National Australia Bank Limited, Mumbai Branch (Incorporated in Australia with limited liability)

Pillar 3 Regulatory Disclosure (UK) As at 31 December 2012

Citigroup Inc. Basel II.5 Market Risk Disclosures As of and For the Period Ended December 31, 2013

Fundamental Review of the Trading Book

Citibank, N.A. Bangkok Branch. Basel III Pillar 3. Risk and Capital Management Disclosure

Methodological Framework

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring

JSE CLEAR MARGIN METHODOLOGY

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY GUIDELINES ON STRESS TESTING FOR THE BERMUDA BANKING SECTOR

Discussion Paper on Margin Requirements for non-centrally Cleared Derivatives

Guideline. Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR) Chapter 4 - Settlement and Counterparty Risk. Effective Date: November 2017 / January

FS PERSPE PER C SPE TIVES C

Order Handling and Execution Policy Asset Class Specific Appendices Foreign Exchange (FX) Appendix

REGULATION (EU) 2015/1599 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

Official Journal of the European Union

Guidance Note Capital Requirements Directive Financial derivatives, SFTs and long settlement transactions

LME Clear Board has minimal tolerance for the company to fail to meet its payment obligations within pre-committed timescales.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. TLAC Quantitative Impact Study Report

Market Risk Guidance Notes

BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring ad hoc exercise

Dividend Status - Version 9.0

Final Report. Guidelines on the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities EBA/GL/2018/02.

CALCULATING CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK

Contents. Supplementary Notes on the Financial Statements (unaudited)

1.1. Funded credit protection

ABI Response to EBA Discussion Paper On Defining Liquid Assets in the LCR under the draft CRR

Supplementary Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)

Interim financial statements (unaudited)

A Guide to LME Clear THE WAY FORWARD IS CLEAR

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative document. Guidelines for Computing Capital for Incremental Risk in the Trading Book

UK Action Plan to reduce reliance on CRA Ratings

Citadel Securities (Europe) Limited

Advanced Concepts in Capturing Market Risk: A Supervisory Perspective

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

2nd Order Sensis: PnL and Hedging

ESMA CONTRIBUTION TO THE EBA S DRAFT REGULATORY TECHNICAL STANDARDS ON CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CCPs

BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES

E.ON General Statement to Margin requirements for non-centrally-cleared derivatives

I. Proportionality in the market risk framework + simplified Standardised Approach ("SA")

2017 HSBC Bank Canada Regulatory Capital and Risk Management Pillar 3 Supplemental Disclosures as at September 30, 2017

2017 HSBC Bank Canada Regulatory Capital and Risk Management Pillar 3 Supplemental Disclosures as at June 30, 2017

2017 HSBC Bank Canada Regulatory Capital and Risk Management Pillar 3 Supplemental Disclosures as at March 31, 2017

Regulatory Capital Disclosures

Pillar III Disclosure Report 2017

NSCCL. Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring

LEVERAGE POLICY. V.02 August 2017 USER03

NSCCL. Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions

Margins. Before you begin. What are margins? ASX Clear

Pillar 3 Disclosure Report For the First Half 2013

Impact after the upgrade of terminals and before 24 January

Basel II Pillar 3 Disclosures

ANNEXES. to the. COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No.../...

Two issues were raised in your letter, which we address in turn below. 1. Resolution of differences between The Associations and RMA

Brussels, XXX [ ](2016) XXX draft. ANNEXES 1 to 4 ANNEXES

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring

Regulatory Capital Disclosures

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

ISDA SIMM TM,1 GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK September 19, 2017

NFA Response to CPMI- IOSCO Consultative Report. Harmonisation of key OTC derivatives data elements (other than UTI and UPI) first batch

Instructions for the EU-specific CRR Leverage ratio template

Matching Rules. Defined Terms

(Text with EEA relevance)

ECC CPMI-IOSCO Disclosure III/2017

Opinion (Annex) 2 May 2016 ESMA/2016/668

CONSOLIDATED NOTICE FOR TRADED OPTIONS PROCEDURES UPDATED AND RESTATED

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

Market Risk Capital Disclosures Report. For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2014

June 20, Japanese Bankers Association

Public Quantitative Disclosure Standards for Central Counterparties ASX Clear (Futures) Pty Limited

Chapter 17: General Provisions Regarding Large and Excess Exposures...

Transcription:

Introduction A CCP shall assess its margin coverage by performing an ex-post comparison of observed outcomes with expected outcomes derived from the use of margin models. Such back testing analysis shall be performed each day in order to evaluate whether there are any testing exceptions to margin coverage. Coverage shall be evaluated on current positions for financial instruments, clearing members and take into account possible effects from portfolio margining and, where appropriate, interoperable CCPs. ESMA Article 49 paragraph 1 LME Clear executes a number of back tests using different parameters and assumptions. Where applicable this is performed via factor backtesting and on Clearing Member accounts using portfolio back testing. LME Clear will also use the methodology on back testing the performance of collateral haircuts. LME Clear uses the BASEL traffic light approach (BASEL II coverage test) and Kupiec-POF test to analyse the results of backtesting. 2

Governance - Generic Backtesting is performed on a daily basis. Any breaches are analysed and reported to the Clearing Risk Committee on a monthly basis. At the point at which the number of breaches in a historical look-back period exceeds pre-determined thresholds then this will be immediately escalated to the Clearing Risk Committee with a full explanation and where appropriate the proposed actions. A quarterly report will be provided to the Board Risk Committee. The results of backtesting will be made available to Clearing Members on a regular basis. 3

BASEL Traffic Light and Kupiec POF tests - Generic The coverage test has been derived from BASEL II practices to estimate the maximum number of breaches allowed per time window. LME Clear chose a traffic light approach that is derived from the Basel II regulation Annex 10a (page 315) which defines three zones; Green, Yellow and Red. The Basel Traffic Light approach uses a yellow zone beginning at the confidence interval at 95% of not achieving the stated margin methodology. The red zone begins at the point such that the probability exceeds 99.99%. Instead of calculating the start of the red zone as defined by the Basel approach, LME Clear utilises the more conservative Kupiec-POF test at a 99% confidence interval to provide a more statistically robust measure. LME Clear calculates the maximum number of breaches allowed per time window derived from the rules above. 4

Factor Margin Backtesting LME Clear performs the backtesting of all SPAN margin parameters using one and two day nonoverlapping returns over a rolling period of 500 data points. This is carried out by comparing price returns over a one day and two day period against the margin parameter set by LME Clear. Margin parameters are compared to a forward absolute return, mirroring what would happen in the event of a Member default where LME Clear Initial Margin would need to cover the price moves on the subsequent days. This tests the appropriateness of the rates set by LME Clear and ensures those rates cover both one and two day returns sufficiently. 5

Factor Margin Backtesting April 2018 results The table below summarises the results. For NASAAC a single tier combination shows 10 breaches in the look-back period, with no additional breaches within the recent testing period Zinc has been the scope of a specific review presented to the Clearing Risk Committee and resultant actions implemented For Cobalt (CO), two tier combinations (Tier 1v1 and 4v5) have 10 breaches following price returns in early and late February 2018. A review will take place but no actions proposed due to materiality - total CO inter-prompt spread charge is only $26,044 (less than 0.01% of IM). All other inter-prompt results are within the green threshold All scanning range, volatility shifts, inter-currency shifts and inter-commodity spread credits are in the green threshold. 6

Portfolio Margin Backtesting The LME Clear risk appetite states that LME Clear s margining model seeks to ensure that at each position account level a minimum 99.5% of observed losses will be less than the initial margin held. LME Clear will perform daily portfolio backtesting on all Members, for each position account. LME Clear will look to pass portfolio backtesting at a confidence interval of 99.5% on both one day and two day clean P&L. All portfolio backtesting will use 500 data points on each account to analyse backtesting results. For any new Member accounts, LME Clear will analyse and report on any breaches. However a minimum number of data points are required for the account level portfolio backtesting to be statistically relevant. LME Clear deems 250 data points to be sufficient. 7

Portfolio Margin Backtesting assumptions While analysing the backtesting results, the known SPAN margin algorithm limitations will be taken into account. Where breaches at an account level are caused by a known limitation, which are managed outside of the Initial Margin calculation, these will be documented. This may require no action to be taken or new model proposed, even if the number of breaches falls into the Red threshold. While the backtesting data will use a significant and realistic spread of real portfolios covering a substantial range of instruments and strategies, LME Clear will identify specific hypothetical strategies to prove the effectiveness of the algorithm and backtest these in conjunction with real portfolios. For the purpose of further validating the model LME Clear has included fixed representative portfolios within the analysis. This allows LME Clear to perform some relevant statistical analysis. Portfolio Backtesting April 2018 results The maximum number of breaches on a single member portfolio is one and there are currently no breaches on any hypothetical or representative portfolios. Therefore all results are in the green threshold. 8

Collateral Backtesting Member collateral back testing follows the same reporting and governance process as cleared positions. Back testing performed in 2 areas; Risk Factor; Securities zero coupon curves with volatility converted to prices, Gold spot prices, FX spot rates, LME Warrants cash price Member Portfolio Position account level, clean portfolio Results measured on same Basel II combined with Kupiec-POF basis as margin collateral against a 99.5% confidence level Results capture 1,000 data points of 1 day historical movements, 500 data points of non-overlapping 2 day historical movements. 9