Inclusive Growth Calderdale project data pack

Similar documents
Grow the Economy Briefing note

Inclusive Growth Monitor: Technical Notes Authors:

Neighbourhoods. The English Indices of Deprivation Bradford District. Neighbourhoods. Statistical Release. June 2011.

MONITORING POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN NORTHERN IRELAND 2016

2015 No. 755 PUBLIC SERVICE PENSIONS, ENGLAND AND WALES. The Local Government Pension Scheme (Amendment) Regulations 2015

Spotlight on Business, Administration and Finance

People 7 DEMOGRAPHICS

Deprivation in Rochdale Borough Indices of Deprivation 2004 (Revised)

The Impacts of Welfare Reform

What salary will a typical first-time buyer need in 2020?

Work and Health Programme

MONITORING POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION 2013

Stockport (Local Authority)

1 ` 2016/17 Corporate Performance Report

York, North Yorkshire And East Riding (Numbers)

Reforming Council Tax Benefit

1 GREATER MANCHESTER LOCAL ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

North Warwickshire Local Economic Assessment Summary. October 2011

Stockport (Local Authority)

Stratford-on-Avon Local Economic Assessment Summary. October 2011

How much reserves have they got?

Nuneaton & Bedworth Local Economic Assessment Summary. October 2011

West Yorkshire (Met County) (Numbers)

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 1,180,900 6,168,400 64,169,400 Males 578,500 3,040,300 31,661,600 Females 602,500 3,128,100 32,507,800

Cornwall And Isles Of Scilly (Numbers)

Stoke-On- Trent And Staffordshire (Numbers)

ITEM 3.1 (I) APP 1 STATE OF THE D2N2 ECONOMY REGIONAL ECONOMIC CONTEXT AND TRENDS

The Impacts of Welfare Reform

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 564,600 5,860,700 64,169,400 Males 279,200 2,904,300 31,661,600 Females 285,400 2,956,400 32,507,800

INDICATORS OF POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN RURAL ENGLAND: 2009

West Midlands (Met County) (Numbers)

WIRRAL ECONOMIC PROFILE: NOVEMBER 2015

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 623,100 5,516,000 63,785,900 Males 305,300 2,711,600 31,462,500 Females 317,900 2,804,400 32,323,500

Coventry And Warwickshire (Numbers) All People 909,700 5,800,700 63,785,900 Males 453,500 2,872,600 31,462,500 Females 456,200 2,928,100 32,323,500

Third sector organisations in Yorkshire and the Humber

SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE ECONOMIC PROFILE

For review, comment and to spark conversations.version as at 01 September 2016

Nottingham And Nottingham And. All People 2,178,000 4,724,400 63,785,900 Males 1,077,300 2,335,000 31,462,500 Females 1,100,700 2,389,400 32,323,500

All People 23,100 5,424,800 64,169,400 Males 11,700 2,640,300 31,661,600 Females 11,300 2,784,500 32,507,800. Shetland Islands (Numbers)

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 7,700 8,825,000 64,169,400 Males 4,200 4,398,800 31,661,600 Females 3,500 4,426,200 32,507,800

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 176,200 6,168,400 64,169,400 Males 87,200 3,040,300 31,661,600 Females 89,000 3,128,100 32,507,800

All People 437,100 5,450,100 64,169,400 Males 216,700 2,690,500 31,661,600 Females 220,500 2,759,600 32,507,800. Kirklees (Numbers)

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 348,000 8,825,000 64,169,400 Males 184,000 4,398,800 31,661,600 Females 164,000 4,426,200 32,507,800

2017 Statistical Profile. County Durham. Altogether better. Durham

All People 130,700 3,125,200 64,169,400 Males 63,500 1,540,200 31,661,600 Females 67,200 1,585,000 32,507,800. Vale Of Glamorgan (Numbers)

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 138,500 6,168,400 64,169,400 Males 69,400 3,040,300 31,661,600 Females 69,000 3,128,100 32,507,800

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 836,300 8,947,900 63,258,400 Males 405,700 4,404,400 31,165,300 Females 430,500 4,543,500 32,093,100

United Kingdom (Level) All People 8,825,000 66,040,200 Males 4,398,800 32,581,800 Females 4,426,200 33,458,400

Tonbridge And Malling (Numbers) All People 128,900 9,080,800 64,169,400 Males 63,100 4,474,400 31,661,600 Females 65,800 4,606,400 32,507,800

Hammersmith And Fulham (Numbers) All People 183,000 8,825,000 64,169,400 Males 90,400 4,398,800 31,661,600 Females 92,600 4,426,200 32,507,800

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 141,000 9,080,800 64,169,400 Males 68,900 4,474,400 31,661,600 Females 72,100 4,606,400 32,507,800

Brighton And Hove (Numbers) All People 288,200 9,080,800 64,169,400 Males 144,800 4,474,400 31,661,600 Females 143,400 4,606,400 32,507,800

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 843,800 9,026,300 63,785,900 Males 410,000 4,447,200 31,462,500 Females 433,800 4,579,100 32,323,500

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 497,900 7,219,600 63,785,900 Males 245,600 3,560,900 31,462,500 Females 252,300 3,658,700 32,323,500

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 1,176,400 6,129,000 63,785,900 Males 576,100 3,021,300 31,462,500 Females 600,300 3,107,700 32,323,500

Monitoring poverty and social exclusion 2009

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 370,300 5,404,700 63,785,900 Males 179,600 2,627,500 31,462,500 Females 190,800 2,777,200 32,323,500

WELFARE REFORM IN THE NORTH WEST IMPACT ON PEOPLE, SERVICES, HOUSING AND THE ECONOMY

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 228,800 5,424,800 64,169,400 Males 113,900 2,640,300 31,661,600 Females 114,900 2,784,500 32,507,800

Cornwall And Isles Of Scilly (Numbers)

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 386,100 8,787,900 63,785,900 Males 190,800 4,379,300 31,462,500 Females 195,200 4,408,600 32,323,500

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 283,500 7,224,000 63,785,900 Males 140,400 3,563,200 31,462,500 Females 143,100 3,660,800 32,323,500

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 186,600 6,130,500 63,785,900 Males 92,600 3,021,700 31,462,500 Females 94,000 3,108,900 32,323,500

North West Leicestershire (Numbers) All People 98,600 4,724,400 63,785,900 Males 48,900 2,335,000 31,462,500 Females 49,800 2,389,400 32,323,500

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 267,500 9,080,800 64,169,400 Males 132,500 4,474,400 31,661,600 Females 135,000 4,606,400 32,507,800

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 325,300 4,724,400 63,785,900 Males 164,500 2,335,000 31,462,500 Females 160,800 2,389,400 32,323,500

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 49,600 5,559,300 64,169,400 Males 24,000 2,734,200 31,661,600 Females 25,700 2,825,100 32,507,800

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 140,700 9,026,300 63,785,900 Males 68,100 4,447,200 31,462,500 Females 72,600 4,579,100 32,323,500

All People 280,000 6,168,400 64,169,400 Males 138,200 3,040,300 31,661,600 Females 141,800 3,128,100 32,507,800. Central Bedfordshire (Numbers)

English Indices of Deprivation 2015 Bradford District in focus

United Kingdom (Level) All People 1,870,800 66,040,200 Males 920,200 32,581,800 Females 950,600 33,458,400

All People 175,800 5,860,700 64,169,400 Males 87,400 2,904,300 31,661,600 Females 88,400 2,956,400 32,507,800. Telford And Wrekin (Numbers)

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 2,300 5,517,000 63,785,900 Males 1,200 2,712,300 31,462,500 Females 1,100 2,804,600 32,323,500

Stockport Local Economic Assessment

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 1,201,900 7,258,600 64,169,400 Males 593,300 3,581,200 31,661,600 Females 608,600 3,677,400 32,507,800

Merseyside (Met County) (Numbers) All People 1,416,800 7,258,600 64,169,400 Males 692,300 3,581,200 31,661,600 Females 724,600 3,677,400 32,507,800

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 648,200 6,168,400 64,169,400 Males 324,200 3,040,300 31,661,600 Females 324,100 3,128,100 32,507,800

GB (numbers) All people 185,200 5,462,900 57,851,100 Males 93,500 2,680,900 28,275,200 Females 91,700 2,782,000 29,575,900.

Marmot Indicators 2015 A preliminary summary with graphs

All People 150,700 5,404,700 63,785,900 Males 74,000 2,627,500 31,462,500 Females 76,700 2,777,200 32,323,500. Perth And Kinross (Numbers)

Low Pay in Older Industrial Britain

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 85,100 5,810,800 63,785,900 Males 42,300 2,878,100 31,462,500 Females 42,800 2,932,600 32,323,500

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 127,500 5,517,000 63,785,900 Males 63,200 2,712,300 31,462,500 Females 64,400 2,804,600 32,323,500

All People 532,500 5,425,400 63,785,900 Males 262,500 2,678,200 31,462,500 Females 270,100 2,747,200 32,323,500. Bradford (Numbers)

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 2,897,300 5,860,700 64,169,400 Males 1,434,500 2,904,300 31,661,600 Females 1,462,800 2,956,400 32,507,800

Brighton And Hove (Numbers) All People 287,200 9,030,300 63,785,900 Males 144,300 4,449,200 31,462,500 Females 142,900 4,581,100 32,323,500

Cornwall and Isles of Scilly LEP: Strategy and Business Plan

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 64,000 6,168,400 64,169,400 Males 31,500 3,040,300 31,661,600 Females 32,500 3,128,100 32,507,800

All People 263,400 5,450,100 64,169,400 Males 129,400 2,690,500 31,661,600 Females 134,000 2,759,600 32,507,800. Rotherham (Numbers)

Greater Manchester Welfare Reform Dashboard Q3, 2018

MONITORING POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION 2015

Stockton-On- Tees (Numbers) All People 196,500 2,644,700 64,169,400 Males 96,800 1,297,900 31,661,600 Females 99,700 1,346,800 32,507,800

All People 295,800 2,644,700 64,169,400 Males 149,400 1,297,900 31,661,600 Females 146,400 1,346,800 32,507,800. Newcastle Upon Tyne (Numbers)

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 259,900 5,860,700 64,169,400 Males 128,900 2,904,300 31,661,600 Females 131,000 2,956,400 32,507,800

2016 Statistical Profile. (December 2016 Update) Durham City Major Centre. Altogether better. Durham. Durham Area Action Partnership

About the author. About the Education Policy Institute

Michelle Jones, Stephanie Tipping

Gender Pay Gap Report 2017

Transcription:

Inclusive Growth project data pack JRF Inclusive Growth Monitor Indicators: results compared with Best Borough in the North authorities and 20 January 2017 Performance and Business Intelligence Team Council Email: performance.businessintelligence@calderdale.gov.uk 8

Inclusive Growth what is it? The OECD defines Inclusive as economic growth that creates opportunity for all segments of the population and distributes the dividends of increased prosperity, both in monetary and non-monetary terms, fairly across society. Nationally, there s been much discussion about JAMS (just about managing), Left Behind Britain, the Gig economy etc, and the RSA (Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce) are currently undertaking an Inclusive Growth Commission, due to report in March. The Government have also commissioned Matthew Taylor to undertake a review on modern employment practices. In West Yorkshire, the Combined Authority are leading on an Inclusive Growth task and finish piece of work, and something similar is underway in. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation have identified a list of 18 Inclusive Growth Monitor Indicators which they feel will provide a good benchmark of how an area is performing. The attached data pack looks at each of those datasets in turn and compares with the average. Steve Barnbrook Inclusive Growth Project Lead Council 9

Index Theme Topic Indicator (click on link to view data) Full Description of Indicator Leeds City Region Rank* (out of 10 unless stated; 1 = best) Best Borough in the North Rank # (out of 20 unless stated; 1 = best) Inclusion Income Out of work benefits Percentage of working-age population receiving out-of-work benefits 7 5 In work tax credits Low earnings Percentage in-work households with and without children receiving Child and/or Working Tax Credits 20th percentile of gross weekly earnings (Twenty per cent of full-time workers receive earnings equal to or below this threshold) Not available Not available 4 5 Living Costs Housing affordability Ratio of lower quartile house price to lower quartile earnings 2 4 Labour Market Exclusion Housing costs Fuel Poverty Unemployment Economic inactivity Median monthly rents for private sector two bedroom properties Percentage of households classed as being 'fuel poor' (using Low Income-High Costs model) Percentage of working-age population not in employment but actively seeking and available to start work Percentage of working-age population who are economically inactive Joint 6th with 3 LAs 4 8 20 2 out of 8 2 5 5 Workless households Percentage of working age households with no one in work 5 4 * is a Local Enterprise Region for ten local authorities in Yorkshire. These are Barnsley, Bradford,, Craven, Harrogate, Kirklees, Leeds, Selby, Wakefield and York. #Best Borough in the North is a list of 20 authorities in the North of England including. Council benchmarks its corporate performance on selected metrics against this list. The authorities are: Barnsley, Bolton, Bury,, Doncaster, Gateshead, Kirklees, Knowsley, North Tyneside, Oldham, Rochdale, Rotherham, Sefton, South Tyneside, St Helens, Stockport, Tameside, Trafford, Wigan and Wirral. 10

Index Theme Topic Indicator (click on link to view data) Full Description of Indicator Leeds City Region Rank* (out of 10 unless stated; 1 = best) Best Borough in the North Rank # (out of 20 unless stated; 1 = best) Prosperity Output Growth Output Gross Value Added (GVA) per capita Not available Not available Private sector business Number of private sector workplaces per 1,000 resident population 4 3 Wages and earnings Median gross weekly pay for full-time workers 4 5 Employment Workplace jobs Employee jobs by working-age population (jobs density) 4 2 Human Capital People in employment Employment in low paid sectors Higher level occupations Working age population qualifications NVQ2 and above Educational Attainment Percentage of working age population in employment (employment rate) Percentage employed in administrative and support services, wholesale and retail trade, accommodation and food services, and residential social care Percentage of workers in managerial, professional and technical/ scientific occupations (SOCs 1, 2 and 3) Percentage of working-age population qualified at NVQ Level 2 and above Percentage of pupils at the end of Key Stage 4 achieving 5 or more GCSEs or equivalent at grades A* to C (including English and Mathematics) 4 Joint 4th Not relevant Not relevant Not relevant Not relevant 5 9 2 out of 7 5 * is a Local Enterprise Region for ten local authorities in Yorkshire. These are Barnsley, Bradford,, Craven, Harrogate, Kirklees, Leeds, Selby, Wakefield and York. #Best Borough in the North is a list of 20 authorities in the North of England including. Council benchmarks its corporate performance on selected metrics against this list. The authorities are: Barnsley, Bolton, Bury,, Doncaster, Gateshead, Kirklees, Knowsley, North Tyneside, Oldham, Rochdale, Rotherham, Sefton, South Tyneside, St Helens, Stockport, Tameside, Trafford, Wigan and Wirral. 11

Inclusion Theme: Income Percentage of working-age population receiving out-of-work benefits Table 1 ai: Percentage of working-age population receiving out-of-work benefits Area May-11 May 12 May-13 May-14 May-15 May-16 15.6% 16.2% 15.8% 14.8% 13.8% 13.0% Best Borough in the North average 18.2% 18.5% 17.8% 16.5% 15.5% 14.7% 15.2% 15.6% 15.2% 14.1% 13.4% 12.7% Fig 1 ai: Percentage of working-age population receiving out-of-work benefits 19.0% 18.0% 17.0% 16.0% 15.0% 14.0% Best Borough in the North average 13.0% 12.0% May-11 May 12 May-13 May-14 May-15 May-16 Data source DWP Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study (benefit claimants - working-age client group) https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=105 accessed 13/1/2017 12

Inclusion Theme: Income Percentage in-work households with & without children receiving Child &/or Working Tax Credits Table 1aii a: Total in-work families in receipt of HMRC Working Tax and Child Tax Credits ('0000s) Area 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 16.5 12.6 12.4 12.4 224 170 170 170 Data sources HMRC Child and Working Tax Credit Finalized Award Statistics - Geographical Statistics, ttps://www.gov.uk/government/collections/personal-tax-credits-statistics, accessed 21/12/2016 Table 1aii b: Percentage of Households in receipt of HMRC Working Tax and Child Tax Credits Fig 1aii a: Total in-work families in receipt of HMRC Working Tax and Child Tax Credits ('0000s) Area 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 27.7 21.0 20.8 Data source: JRF & Sheffield Hallam University (2016) Joseph Rowntree Foundation Inclusive Growth Monitor Databased, sheet Indicator Levels Data source: JRF & University of Manchester Inclusive Growth Analysis Unit (2016) Inclusive Growth Monitor: City region comparisons and a focus on Greater Manchester Figure 15: Prosperity Indicators for Local Authority Areas (2014), http://www.cities.manchester.ac.uk/medialibrary/igau/igau-inclusive-growth-indicators-core-cities-2016.pdf, accessed 21/12/2016 13

Inclusion Theme: Income 20th percentile of gross weekly earnings # : #Twenty per cent of full-time workers receive earnings equal to or below this threshold Table 1aiii a: 20th percentile of gross weekly earnings: authorities Fig 1aiii a: 20th percentile of gross weekly earnings: Area 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Selby 345.9 334.5 351.4 352.4 364.0 361.8 Harrogate 331.8 334.2 324.0 326.9 346.0 350.4 York 318.4 327.4 336.6 345.0 345.2 351.0 Leeds 329.0 335.4 345.0 334.7 345.0 359.4 316.5 329.2 317.1 323.8 341.0 358.7 Kirklees 317.2 322.0 325.8 334.7 336.3 347.8 Wakefield 300.1 306.4 316.0 318.4 334.5 332.0 Barnsley 316.7 328.1 323.1 328.0 325.0 332.3 Bradford 296.0 306.4 312.7 311.9 324.3 328.7 Craven 311.5 306.1 293.4 308.2 318.8 309.2 317.0 323.7 328.2 328.0 370.0 360.0 350.0 340.0 330.0 320.0 310.0 300.0 290.0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Data sources: NOMIS, annual survey of hours and earnings - resident analysis 2006 to 2016, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=30, accessed 21/12//2016 JRF & University of Manchester Inclusive Growth Analysis Unit (2016) Inclusive Growth Monitor: City region comparisons and a focus on Greater Manchester Figure 15: Prosperity Indicators for Local Authority Areas (2014), http://www.cities.manchester.ac.uk/medialibrary/igau/igau-inclusive-growth-indicators-core-cities-2016.pdf, accessed 21/12/2016 14

Inclusion Theme: Income 20th percentile of gross weekly earnings # : Best Borough in the North authorities #Twenty per cent of full-time workers receive earnings equal to or below this threshold Table 1aiii b: 20th percentile of gross weekly earnings : Best Borough in the North authorities Area 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Trafford 334.7 355.4 351.9 359.7 359.4 394.5 Bury 343.7 323.4 349.3 343.8 353.8 371.9 Wirral 329.0 334.4 333.6 342.2 345.8 360.6 Stockport 334.8 344.9 351.1 345.1 363.1 359.5 316.5 329.2 317.1 323.8 341.0 358.7 North Tyneside 317.4 317.4 333.9 341.3 351.4 357.2 Kirklees 317.2 322.0 325.8 334.7 336.3 347.8 St. Helens 324.4 307.8 314.3 315.7 323.3 345.1 Sefton 321.0 325.6 336.0 335.4 331.5 345.0 Wigan 322.5 322.5 333.0 322.1 341.3 344.9 South Tyneside 309.7 320.2 318.1 330.0 341.2 344.5 Knowsley 324.1 323.1 312.8 318.1 332.8 342.0 Tameside 302.2 308.1 316.5 310.8 328.3 339.9 Gateshead 322.6 330.4 329.6 337.2 333.8 339.8 Bolton 287.5 304.1 318.6 307.8 325.7 334.3 Rochdale 307.7 329.2 320.0 322.0 323.6 333.8 Barnsley 316.7 328.1 323.1 328.0 325.0 332.3 Oldham 300.3 314.4 310.7 320.1 317.5 331.1 Rotherham 310.2 306.6 304.8 308.2 315.8 330.5 Doncaster 301.5 295.1 299.3 317.8 310.5 326.3 Data source: NOMIS, annual survey of hours and earnings - resident analysis 2006 to 2016, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.as p?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=30, accessed 13/1/2017 15

Inclusion Theme: Living costs Ratio of lower quartile house price to lower quartile earnings Table 1bi: Ratio of lower quartile house price to lower quartile earnings Area 2013 2014 2015 4.8 4.75 4.63 Best Borough in the North average 5.09 5.24 5.28 6.06 6.18 6.3 Fig 1bi: Ratio of lower quartile house price to lower quartile earnings 7 6 5 4 3 2 Best Borough in the North average 1 0 2013 2014 2015 Data source: LG Inform, Housing affordability ratio[id: 75], http://www.lginform.local.gov.uk, accessed 13/1/2017 16

Inclusion Theme: Living costs Median monthly rents for private sector two bedroom properties : Table 1bii a: Median monthly rents for private sector two bedroom properties : Area 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 York UA 650 650 695 Craven 500 525 550 Harrogate 650 650 695 Selby 500 510 550 Barnsley 400 400 427 Bradford 450 450 475 450 450 475 Kirklees 450 450 475 Leeds 600 598 615 Wakefield 475 475 495 521 521 Fig 1bii a : Median monthly rents for private sector two bedroom properties : 540 520 500 480 460 440 420 400 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 LCR Ave* *LCR Ave = average Data sources All figures except those for are from Valuation Office Agency administrative database as at 30 September 2016, figure from JRF & Sheffield Hallam University(2016) Joseph Rowntree Foundation Inclusive Growth Monitor Databased, sheet Indicator Levels 17

Inclusion Theme: Living costs Median monthly rents for private sector two bedroom properties : Best Borough in the North authorities Table 1bii b: Median monthly rents for private sector two bedroom properties : Best Borough in the North authorities Area 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 Barnsley 400 400 400 Bolton 450 450 475 Bury 475 495 525 450 450 455 Doncaster 450 450 400 Gateshead 475 475 475 Kirklees 450 450 450 Knowsley 520 498 495 North Tyneside 495 495 500 Oldham 465 475 475 Rochdale 450 450 450 Rotherham 450 450 450 Sefton 550 550 550 South Tyneside 450 450 450 St. Helens 450 450 450 Stockport 575 575 625 Tameside 475 475 485 Trafford 675 695 700 Wigan 440 425 450 Wirral 495 479 475 Data source: Valuation Office Agency administrative database as at 30 September 2016, https://data.gov.uk/publisher/valuation-office-agency 18

Inclusion Theme: Living costs Percentage of households classed as being 'fuel poor' (using LCHI model) : LIHC = Low Cost High Income Table 1biii a: Percentage of households classed as being 'fuel poor' (using LIHC model): Area 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 19.5% 12.1% 11.6% 11.7% 12.2% 18.3% 11.1% 11.2% 11.0% Fig 1biii a: Percentage of households classed as being 'fuel poor (using LIHC model) : 20.0% 18.0% 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Data sources: Gov.uk Annual sub-regional poverty data: low income high costs indicator, 2011 2014; https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/fuel-poverty-sub-regional-statistics accessed 13/1/2017 Gov.uk Fuel poverty 2010: sub-regional data; https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/fuel-poverty-sub-regional-statistics accessed 13/1/2017 19

Inclusion Theme: Living costs Percentage of households classed as 'fuel poor' (LCHI model): Best Borough in the North authorities LIHC = Low Cost High Income Table 1biii b: Percentage of households classed as being 'fuel poor' (using LIHC model) : Best Borough in the North authorities Area 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Stockport 18.5% 12.3% 9.7% 9.2% 9.8% North Tyneside 19.0% 10.7% 9.7% 9.9% 9.9% Wigan 19.8% 11.3% 9.4% 9.1% 9.9% Tameside 19.7% 11.9% 10.4% 9.8% 10.2% St. Helens 20.0% 11.3% 10.1% 9.7% 10.3% Bury 19.1% 12.4% 10.3% 10.1% 10.4% Trafford 18.5% 13.1% 11.1% 10.0% 10.4% Bolton 19.7% 11.4% 11.4% 11.0% 10.5% Rotherham 18.2% 10.1% 9.8% 9.0% 10.5% Knowsley 19.5% 9.9% 10.2% 10.4% 10.7% Oldham 19.8% 11.3% 11.2% 10.7% 10.7% Wirral 20.5% 13.5% 11.2% 10.6% 10.9% Gateshead 22.6% 10.9% 11.0% 10.9% 11.2% Sefton 20.9% 14.4% 11.4% 10.9% 11.2% Barnsley 20.3% 10.9% 9.7% 9.2% 11.3% Rochdale 20.0% 11.5% 11.5% 11.3% 11.4% Doncaster 20.1% 11.4% 10.0% 9.8% 11.6% Kirklees 18.9% 11.5% 12.0% 11.8% 11.6% South Tyneside 21.3% 10.2% 11.0% 11.3% 11.8% 19.5% 12.1% 11.6% 11.7% 12.2% Data sources: Gov.uk Annual sub-regional poverty data: low income high costs indicator, 2011 2014; https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/fuel-poverty-sub-regional-statistics accessed 13/1/2017 Gov.uk Fuel poverty 2010: sub-regional data; https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/fuel-poverty-sub-regional-statistics accessed 13/1/2017 20

Inclusion Theme: Labour Market Exclusion Unemployment rate aged 16-64 Table 1ci: Unemployment rate - aged 16-64 Area Sep-10 Sep-11 Sep-12 Sep-13 Sep-14 Sep-15 Sep-16 7.8% 9.9% 8.7% 7.6% 6.5% 4.4% 4.0% Best Borough in the North average 8.8% 9.6% 9.5% 8.9% 8.0% 6.2% 5.8% 8.5% 9.7% 8.7% 8.6% 7.9% 6.1% 5.3% Fig 1ci: Unemployment rate - aged 16-64 11.0% 10.0% 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% Sep-11 Sep-12 Sep 13 Sep-14 Sep-15 Sep-16 Best Borough in the North average Data source: Annual Population Survey, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=17, accessed 19/1/2017 21

Inclusion Theme: Labour Market Exclusion Percentage of working-age population who are economically inactive Table 1cii: % who are economically inactive - aged 16-64 Area Sep-11 Sep 12 Sep-13 Sep-14 Sep-15 Sep-16 24.1% 23.1% 21.8% 20.2% 19.9% 20.8% Best Borough in the North average 25.3% 24.6% 24.0% 24.2% 23.3% 24.2% 25.3% 24.5% 23.2% 24.0% 22.8% 22.9% Fig 1cii: % who are economically inactive - aged 16-64 26.0% 25.0% 24.0% 23.0% 22.0% 21.0% 20.0% 19.0% 18.0% 17.0% Sep-11 Sep 12 Sep-13 Sep-14 Sep-15 Sep-16 Best Borough in the North average Data source: Annual Population Survey, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=17, accessed 19/1/2017 22

Inclusion Theme: Labour Market Exclusion Percentage of working age households with no one in work Table 1ciii: Percentage of working age households with no one in work Area 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 19.3% 18.1% 17.7% 14.6% 14.7% Best Borough in the North average 21.5% 21.3% 20.2% 19.1% 17.6% 20.4% 18.6% 17.9% 17.4% 15.8% Fig 1ciii: Percentage of working age households with no one in work 22.0% 21.0% 20.0% 19.0% 18.0% 17.0% 16.0% Best Borough in the North average 15.0% 14.0% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Data source: Annual Population Survey - Households by combined economic activity status (2004 to 2015), https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=136, accessed 17/1/2017 23

Prosperity Theme: Output Growth Gross Value Added (GVA) per capita Table 2ai: Gross Value Added (GVA) per capita Area 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 and Kirklees 16,156 16,607 17,028 17,240 17,755 18,283 18,698 18,934 19,524 20,073 Fig 2ai b: JRF estimates of GVA per capita by Local authority in : 2014 Fig 2ai a: GVA per capita: and Kirklees compared with (LCR) average 21,000 20,000 19,000 18,000 17,000 16,000 15,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Fig 2ai b: Data source: JRF & University of Manchester Inclusive Growth Analysis Unit (2016) Inclusive Growth Monitor: City region comparisons and a focus on Greater Manchester Figure 15: Prosperity Indicators for Local Authority Areas (2014), http://www.cities.manchester.ac.uk/medialibrary/igau/igau-inclusive-growth-indicators-corecities-2016.pdf, accessed 21/12/2016 Table 2ai and Fig 2ai a: Data source: ONS Regional GVA (Income Approach) Statistics 1997 to 2014 (Excel sheet gvaireferencetablesv2_tcm77-426884.xls, table 2) accessed 22/12/2016 and Kirklees LCR 24

Prosperity Theme: Output Growth Number of private sector workplaces per 1,000 resident populations Table 2aii: Number of Private Sector Workplaces per 1K Resident Population Area 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 36.6 37.2 37.1 38.3 41.2 Best Borough in the North average 28.8 29.4 29.4 30.4 33.1 33.4 34.0 34.0 35.0 38 Fig 2aii: Number of Private Sector Workplaces per 1K Resident Population 43.0 41.0 39.0 37.0 35.0 33.0 31.0 29.0 27.0 25.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Best Borough in the North average Data source: ONS UK Business Counts Local Units, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=141, accessed 19/1/2017 25

Prosperity Theme: Output Growth Median gross weekly pay for full-time workers : Table 2aiii a: Median gross weekly pay for full-time workers: Area 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Selby 540.9 512.7 532.8 534.7 536.3 549.4 Harrogate 488.8 480.1 507.4 487.1 518.7 535.5 462.3 515.6 479.7 493.3 503.1 521.1 Leeds 477.0 475.6 498.2 496.2 498.4 528.7 York 487.6 523.1 526.5 476.9 495.6 509.6 Kirklees 463.9 478.5 488.2 479.7 480.8 494.9 Barnsley 447.6 465.0 479.7 486.7 469.6 477.3 Wakefield 431.4 427.1 454.0 442.1 461.0 479.7 Craven 462.4 450.3 431.1 461.5 450.2 413.1 Bradford 417.7 426.6 446.4 447.5 449.5 473.5 461.2 467.1 483.0 478.2 Fig 2aiii a: Median gross weekly pay for full-time workers: 530.0 520.0 510.0 500.0 490.0 480.0 470.0 460.0 450.0 440.0 430.0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 LCR Ave* Data sources: NOMIS, annual survey of hours and earnings - resident analysis 2006 to 2016, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=30, accessed 20/11/2016 JRF & University of Manchester Inclusive Growth Analysis Unit (2016) Inclusive Growth Monitor: City region comparisons and a focus on Greater Manchester Figure 15: Prosperity Indicators for Local Authority Areas (2014), http://www.cities.manchester.ac.uk/medialibrary/igau/igau-inclusive-growth-indicators-core-cities-2016.pdf, accessed 21/12/2016 26

Prosperity Theme: Output Growth Median gross weekly pay for full-time workers: Best Borough in the North authorities Table 2aiii : Median gross weekly pay for full-time workers : Best Borough in the North comparator group Area 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Trafford 561.5 567.4 574.2 568.2 564.4 600.9 Stockport 497.3 517.4 537.1 522.0 540.0 541.9 Wirral 476.5 497.9 503.1 496.1 518.6 526.4 Bury 497.9 496.8 493.0 501.3 519.8 523.2 462.3 515.6 479.7 493.3 503.1 521.1 North Tyneside 456.6 454.4 479.4 460.8 503.0 514.4 York 487.6 523.1 526.5 476.9 495.6 509.6 Sefton 469.1 480.0 487.6 494.0 473.7 509.1 Wigan 458.1 471.1 491.1 481.6 502.4 501.3 St. Helens 482.1 479.2 450.2 475.2 479.1 499.3 Kirklees 463.9 478.5 488.2 479.7 480.8 494.9 Gateshead 456.9 465.7 475.2 486.6 486.5 485.5 Rotherham 450.9 462.8 447.6 457.3 481.1 484.9 Doncaster 462.5 449.6 461.9 482.5 467.0 479.1 Barnsley 447.6 465.0 479.7 486.7 469.6 477.3 Knowsley 434.5 451.0 463.8 462.7 475.5 475.0 Rochdale 446.0 477.3 458.1 458.3 463.4 470.1 South Tyneside 446.1 450.2 454.4 464.6 473.6 469.0 Oldham 411.5 425.7 429.9 457.7 442.5 469.0 Bolton 436.6 431.3 465.3 442.4 469.1 466.1 Tameside 420.1 429.3 423.0 432.3 447.0 460.1 Data source NOMIS, annual survey of hours and earnings - resident analysis 2006 to 2016, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/constr uct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version =0&dataset=30, accessed 18/1/2017 27

Prosperity Theme: Employment Employee jobs by working-age population (jobs density) Table 2bi: Number of employee jobs by working-age population (jobs density) Area 2013 2014 2015 0.78 0.84 0.86 Best Borough in the North average 0.65 0.67 0.69 0.76 0.78 0.81 Fig 2bi: Number of employee jobs by working-age population (jobs density) 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 Best Borough in the North average 0.50 2013 2014 2015 Data source: ONS Jobs Density series, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=57, accessed 18/1/2017 28

Prosperity Theme: Employment Percentage of working age population in employment (employment rate) Table 2bii: Percentage of working age population in employment (employment rate) Area Sep 11 Sep-12 Sep-13 Sep-14 Sep-15 Sep-16 68.4% 70.2% 72.3% 74.6% 76.6% 76.1% Best Borough in the North average 67.5% 68.2% 69.2% 69.8% 72.0% 71.4% 67.5% 69.0% 70.1% 70.0% 72.5% 73.1% Fig 2bii: Percentage of working age population in employment (employment rate) 78.0% 76.0% 74.0% 72.0% 70.0% 68.0% 66.0% 64.0% 62.0% Sep 11 Sep-12 Sep-13 Sep-14 Sep-15 Sep-16 Best Borough in the North average Data source: Annual Population Survey, https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=17, accessed 18/1/2017 29

Prosperity Theme: Employment Percentage employed in administrative and support services, wholesale and retail trade, accommodation and food services, and residential social care Figure 2biii: Percentage employed in administrative and support services, wholesale and retail trade, accommodation and food services, and residential social care Data source: JRF & University of Manchester Inclusive Growth Analysis Unit (2016) Inclusive Growth Monitor: City region comparisons and a focus on Greater Manchester Figure 15: Prosperity Indicators for Local Authority Areas (2014), http://www.cities.manchester.ac.uk/medialibrary/igau/igau-inclusive-growth-indicators-core-cities-2016.pdf, accessed 21/12/2016 30

Prosperity Theme: Human Capital Percentage of workers in managerial, professional and technical/ scientific occupations (SOCs 1, 2 and 3) Table 2ci: Percentage of Workers in Managerial, Professional and Technical Scientific Occupations (SOCs 1,2 and 3) Area Jun-11 Jun 12 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 Jun-16 42.5% 43.6% 45.2% 47.0% 45.7% 46.1% Best Borough in the North average 38.7% 39.1% 39.5% 39.1% 39.2% 40.7% 39.0% 38.8% 41.4% 41.8% 40.1% 42.3% Fig 2ci: Percentage of Workers in Managerial, Professional and Technical Scientific Occupations (SOCs 1, 2 and 3) 48.0% 46.0% 44.0% 42.0% 40.0% 38.0% 36.0% 34.0% Jun-11 Jun 12 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 Jun-16 Best Borough in the North average Data source: Annual Population Survey (Dec 2014 Jun 2016), https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=17, accessed 21/12/2016 31

Prosperity Theme: Human Capital Percentage of working-age population qualified at NVQ Level 2 and above Table 2cii: Percentage of working-age population qualified at NVQ Level 2 and above Area 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 68.6% 67.2% 68.9% 70.3% 73.7% 72.3% Best Borough in the North average 65.2% 66.4% 69.0% 69.4% 71.1% 71.7% 63.7% 66.5% 68.5% 69.2% 69.9% 70.1% Fig 2cii: Percentage of working-age population qualified at NVQ Level 2 and above 76.0% 74.0% 72.0% 70.0% 68.0% 66.0% 64.0% 62.0% 60.0% 58.0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Best Borough in the North average Data Source: NOMIS, Annual Population Survey (January 2005 to December 2015), https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/summary.asp?mode=construct&version=0&dataset=17, accessed 18/1/2017 32

Prosperity Theme: Human Capital Percentage of pupils at the end of KS 4 achieving 5 + GCSEs or equivalent at grades A* to C (including English and Mathematics) Table 2.3 c: Percentage of pupils at the end of Key Stage 4 achieving 5 or more GCSEs or equivalent at grades A* to C (including English and Mathematics) Area 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 61.1% 65.7% 58.2% 61.8% 60.0% Best Borough in the North average 58.7% 60.3% 55.9% 55.8% 56.2% 60.4% 62.4% 56.6% 56.1% 55.7% Fig 2.3 c: Percentage of pupils at the end of KS 4 achieving 5 or more GCSEs or equivalent at grades A* to C (inc English & Mathematics) 70.0% 65.0% 60.0% 55.0% 50.0% Best Borough in the North average 45.0% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 Data source: LG Inform, GCSE achieved (5a*-c including English and Maths)[ID: 3] http://www.lginform.local.gov.uk, accessed 18/1/2017 33

2024 © financedocbox.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback