Chapel Hill Transit Strategic and Financial Sustainability Plan Update

Similar documents
Federal Assistance 13% Charges for Services 5% Appropriated Fund Balance.5% Other 3% Administration 6% Building Maintenance 3% Other 2%

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL Town Council Work Session 100 Library Drive, Meeting Room B, Chapel Hill, NC :00 P.M., JANUARY 5, 2015

FIVE-YEAR REVENUE AND COST PROJECTIONS FOR MAJOR OPERATING FUNDS

FIVE-YEAR REVENUE AND COST PROJECTIONS FOR MAJOR OPERATING FUNDS

CTA 2007 Contingency Plan

Wake County. People love to be connected. In our cyberspace. transit plan CONNECTING PEOPLE, CONNECTING THE COUNTY

The DRAFT Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County

OCTOBER FY Monthly Financial and Operational Report. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority

FY 2018 Adopted Wake Transit Work Plan

JANUARY FY Monthly Financial and Operational Report. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority

PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2011 BUDGET. Testimony of. Richard Sarles, General Manager. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.

The State of TriMet Contract Reform Needed to Fund Service

Valley Metro Fiscal Year 2014 Financial Results. Budget and Finance Subcommittee October 9, 2014

MARTA 2009 Budget Summary Review

TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY Board of Directors March 14, 2018

FIVE-YEAR REVENUE AND COST PROJECTIONS FOR MAJOR OPERATING FUNDS

Public Transportation Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Public Authorities by the Numbers: Capital District Transportation Authority

Item #4 FEBRUARY 10, 2015 MEETING MINUTES PG. 2 Approve the February 10, 2015 meeting minutes.

2013 STA Passenger Survey Results. Attachment E Title VI Attachment E

The Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County

Agenda. Advisory Committee on Transportation & Parking (ACT) 21 September PM Public Safety Building, EOC Conference Room.

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, COLORADO AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015

Five Year Plan (FY17/18 to FY21/22) - Oct

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview

PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY KEY BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016

VALLEY METRO RPTA FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Funding Local Public Transportation

~ NOTICE OF MEETING ~ CAPITAL METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING

Caltrain Service Preparing for FY2012 Caltrain Benefits Environment, Economy, Quality of Life

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, COLORADO

Operations & Finance Committee Meeting Agenda

FY 2019 Draft Wake Transit Work Plan

FY2011 Budget Forum. District of Columbia. October 19, 2009

Special Audit & Budget Review Meeting: FY16/17 Budget June 23, 2016

Transit Development Plan (FY ) Executive Summary

FY17 FY16 Valley Metro RPTA Sources of Funds FY17 vs FY16

TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012)

Local Cost Allocation Options

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING ACTION ITEM

METRO. Fiscal Year 2012 Monthly Board Report. December 2011 (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

FINANCIAL TRENDS PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE

Operating Budget Report

Executive Summary - Fiscal Year 2016 Valley Metro Rail Preliminary Annual Operating and Capital Budget

Getting Metro Back on Track

Public Transit Services Summary of Submitted 2015 Budget From Rates

Whatcom Transportation Authority

FY06 Operating Budget. FY2006 Proposed Operating Budget. Final Summary for Board Referral

JP Morgan Public Finance Transportation Utility Conference

Public Hearing on Peak Fares for Peak Service

FY 2019 Recommended Wake Transit Work Plan. Spring 2018

Proposed Service Change Title VI Compliance Review

1. Acknowledgements Executive Summary Introduction Guiding Principles Study Process Five-Year Projected Obligations 15

Operating Budget Report

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2018 TRANSIT SUMMIT INFORMATION ITEM. Countywide

Governor s FY 2019 Revised, FY 2020 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 9, 2019

Program Evaluation and Audit COUNTY CONTRACTOR ADA COST REVIEW DARTS AND SCOTT COUNTY

FY2018 Third Quarter Financial Update

TAXICAB INDUSTRY REPORT

University Link LRT Extension

Operating Budget. Third Quarter Financial Report (July 2005 March 2006)

REVENUE & RIDERSHIP REPORT OCTOBER 2017

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 4, :00 A.M.

Minutes of the Fifth Meeting OZAUKEE COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE

MEMORANDUM. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors. Michael T. Burns General Manager. DATE: August 4, 2008

METRO. Monthly Board Report. June 2006

Toronto Transit Commission

TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY Board of Directors April 11, 2018

Governor s FY 2016 Revised, FY 2017 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 13, 2016

Milwaukee County Transit System

Public Transportation

METRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. December 2012 (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

Transportation Committee Meeting date: July 24 th, 2017 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of July 26 th, 2017

Votran Transit Development Plan (TDP) River To Sea TPO Committees September 2016

The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Report to the Legislature

Financial Report - FY 2017 Year to Date May 31, 2017

Streamline Bus Five-Year Business Plan Community Conversations. Lisa Ballard, P.E. November 13, 2012

Governor s FY 2018 Revised, FY 2019 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 12, 2018

Governor s FY 2017 Revised, FY 2018 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 12, 2017

FY2017 Budget Work Session

City of Kingston Information Report to Environment, Infrastructure & Transportation Policies Committee Report Number EITP

Office of the City Manager CONSENT CALENDAR May 19, 2009

FY2016 True Up Overview

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

Intercity Transit Community Update

METRO. Fiscal Year 2014 Monthly Board Report. May 2014

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

FY2014 Operating Budget Performance Report

Fare evasion at NYCT

FY18 Budget Presentation

Customer Service and Operations Committee. Board Information V-D. September 10, 2015

MiWay Business Plan and 2015 Budget

FINANCIAL TRENDS PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE

Financial Plan. Section 8 STATUS QUO PLAN STATUS QUO PLAN ASSUMPTIONS STATUS QUO PLAN BUDGET ITEMS

Title VI Service Equity Analysis: FY2019 Annual Service Plan. Department of Diversity & Transit Equity

Operating Budget Report

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority

METRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. November 2012

Title VI Fare Equity Analysis

Transcription:

Chapel Hill Transit Strategic and Financial Sustainability Plan Update ACT January 21, 2015

Today s Agenda Overview of Chapel Hill Transit Performance Overview Funding Overview Key Challenges Overview Strategic and Financial Sustainability Plan Update Questions and Feedback

CHT Overview CHT is the second largest transit system in North Carolina, serving Chapel Hill, Carrboro and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Responsibilities: Fixed route Bus Service (31 weekday & weekend routes) EZ Rider (ADA Service) Short and Long Range Transit Planning Marketing and Public Relations Major Transit Initiatives Staff (210 employees): Operations 165 Maintenance 31 Administration 14 Fleet (118 revenue vehicles): Buses 99 (29 hybrids) Demand Response 19

Organizational Structure While a department of the Town of Chapel Hill, CHT is advised by the Chapel Hill Transit Partners Committee, which provides policy and financial guidance: Jim Ward, Chair, Town of Chapel Hill Council Member Ed Harrison, Town of Chapel Hill Council Member Matt Czajkowski, Town of Chapel Hill Council Member Damon Seils, Town of Carrboro Alderman Bethany Chaney, Town of Carrboro Alderman Julie Eckenrode, Town of Carrboro Assistant to the Town Manager Meredith Weiss, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Senior Associate Vice Chancellor for Finance and Administration Than Austin, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Associate Director of Transportation and Planning Cheryl Stout, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Director, Transportation and Parking

CHT Delivers Ridership: 6,938,657 annual rides (FY13 14) Over 133,435 rides per week Over 80 rides per capita Service Miles: 2,091,748 Service Hours: 179,044 Performance standards: Rides/Hour: FR 44.3 DR 2.58 Rides/Mile: FR 3.92 DR.20 Cost/Ride: FR $2.53 DR $25.15 (FR = Fixed Route and DR = EZ Rider)

CHT Delivers Median Time Period Performance (Passengers per Hour) 2014 2013 2012 2011 AM Peak Start of service 9:59 a.m. Midday 10:00 a.m. 3:29 p.m. PM Peak 3:30 p.m. 6:59 p.m. Night 7:00 p.m. End of service 62.3 49.7 53.5 39.8 64.1 54.8 56.4 51.1 49.5 42.3 43.9 38.0 36.6 30 30.4 26.6 Weekend 39.35 38.5 37.5 29.5

FY2014 15 Budget Highlights More than 90% of transit expenses are directly related to putting service on the street and are subject to market rates. CHT makes considerable and concerted efforts to mitigate expense increases in every category.

Funding History FY12 13 included first increase in partner contributions in four years. FY09 and FY10 included ARRA funding of about $500,000 in each year.

State & Federal Funding History Note State Assistance has decreased by ~$1Million since FY10 11

Key Challenges Fleet Age: 42 buses, 13 demand response and 12 service vehicles need to be replaced. Staffing: Full Time Operators Supervisory Staff Additional Maintenance Shift Funding Community and Partner Goals: 2020 Plan Current and Planned Development

Financial Sustainability Plan Development of Strategic and Financial Plans: Organizational Staffing Assessment Vision and Goal Setting Process Consistent with 2020 Comprehensive Plan, 2020 Focus Area Studies, Carrboro Vision 2020 and UNC s Development Plans Develop Strategic and Long Term Financial Plan Identify full range of financing strategies to meet operating, maintenance and capital costs

Financial Sustainability Plan Current Focus to Inform FY2016 Budget Process: Capital Plan and Associated Funding Plan Short Term Staffing Plan Future Focus: Service Development Long Term Staffing Plan Performance Benchmarking

Strategic and Financial Sustainability Plan

Significant Ridership Growth 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 Drop in ridership reflects 2010 service cuts 95% Passenger Trips 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Source: National Transit Database Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

Significant Increase in Service Provided 180,000 26% 160,000 140,000 Revenue Hours 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Source: National Transit Database Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

Increase in Cost per Hour of Service Operating Expense per Revenue Hour $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 Operator Salary/Wages: 53% Fringe Benefits: 104% Fuel/Lube: 382% Casualty/Liability Costs: 86% 68% $0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Source: National Transit Database Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

Revenue Trends: Federal Funding $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $- FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Source: Town of Chapel Hill Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

Revenue Trends: State Funding $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000-26% $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $- FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Source: Town of Chapel Hill Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

Chapel Hill Transit Partner Contributions $16,000,000 $14,000,000 49% $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- Source: Town of Chapel Hill FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 UNC Carrboro Chapel Hill Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

State of the System Growth has Stabilized Ridership and service hours remained steady Cost increases largely reflect inflation But, Impact of Growth and Expansion Still Being Felt Providing more service Cost of each unit of service increased Funding equation changed Federal and state funds flat, declining and changing Partner increases offset declines Growth Occurred Without Corresponding Investments Capital mostly vehicles but also some facilities Staffing operators, mechanics, and supervisors Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

State of the System Chapel Hill Transit Operations are Financially Unsustainable $80 million (estimated) additional revenues needed over next 10 years Invest in capital investments Buses, paratransit vehicles, technology, and park-and-ride lots Invest in staff and operations Operators, mechanics, and supervisors Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

Opportunities

Potential Opportunities Orange County Bus and Rail Investment Plan Reduce Service Levels Additional Revenue Sources (Fares) Finance Vehicle Purchases/Lease Vehicles Increase Local Taxes/Partner Contributions Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

Orange County Bus and Rail Investment Plan New (2012) Revenues for Transit in Orange County One-half Cent Sales Tax New or increased Vehicle Registration Fees Full Year Revenues Estimated at $6.7 million All Sources Most for regional services and future light rail Existing Service (Chapel Hill Transit) has Access to New Vehicle Registration Fee Revenues Only Estimated revenue - $338,000/yr 2% per year is assumed growth rate Already assumed in financial projections for operations and capital Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

Reduce Service/Operate Fewer Routes Opportunities Challenges Potential strategy to reduce cost and demands on capital resources Big impact on riders Contrary to CHT Partner priorities and community goals Less service results in fewer federal and state funds Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

Fares and User Fees Opportunities Challenges Shares costs with users Requires capital investment (fare boxes) Will impact service operations and staffing Will impact ridership Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

Leasing and Debt Financing Opportunities Challenges Allows CHT to acquire vehicles relatively quickly Spreads costs evenly over several years Town of Chapel Hill already has vehicle leasing program Current governance structure means Town of Chapel Hill alone would hold the debt Adds financing costs Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

Raise Taxes/Partner Contributions Opportunities Challenges Increase funding to system needs Share burden across partners Contrary to CHT Partner priorities Just raised taxes and increased fees Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

Next Steps Gather input from Town of Chapel Hill Council, Carrboro Board of Aldermen and UNC on overall direction Expand analysis of leasing/vehicle financing concept Continue to work with CHT Partners on issues in partnership agreement related to issuance of debt Examine fare potential (with CHT Partners) Continue work on longer-term capital and staffing plans Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

Questions/Feedback Brian M Litchfield Director Chapel Hill Transit (919) 969 4908 blitchfield@townofchapelhill.org www.chtransit.org www.facebook.com/chtransit www.twitter.com/chtransit Customer Service Line: (919) 969 4900

It s about Community Goals