FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Ann Marie Gorden/Robert Nihen

Similar documents
ERRATA. To: Recipients of MG-388-RC, Estimating Terrorism Risk, RAND Corporation Publications Department. Date: December 2005

HIGH AND WIDE: INCOME INEQUALITY GAP IN THE DISTRICT ONE OF BIGGEST IN THE U.S. By Wes Rivers

Regional Snapshot: The Cost of Living in Metro Atlanta

AEI Center on Housing Markets and Finance Announces Ten Best and Worst Metro Areas to Be a First Time Homebuyer

Office. Office. IRR Viewpoint 2015

Data Brief. Trends in Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Premiums and Employee Contributions in Major Metropolitan Areas,

50-State Property Tax Comparison Study: For Taxes Paid in Executive Summary

Employee Benefits Alert

ehealth Inventory Report of Major Medical Health Plans Available Off of Government Exchanges

2014 U.S. Census (2015) Median African-American Household Income Rank, Memphis Included. Household Median Income Ranking, African American Population

US Hotel Industry Overview. Chris Crenshaw

Employee Benefits Alert

Employee Benefits Alert

American Jobs Act - Preventing Teacher Layoffs Estimated Jobs Impact by State

U.S. Investment Outlook

Relationships. Results. COMPANY OVERVIEW COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE DEBT, EQUITY & SERVICING

Competitive Alternatives. Special Report: Focus on Tax Edition. competitivealternatives.com. Corporate Sponsors

MY PLAN IS GETTING A REBATE FROM THE INSURER WHAT DO I DO WITH IT?

Employee Benefits Alert

Relationships. Results. COMPANY OVERVIEW COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE DEBT, EQUITY & SERVICING

MetroMonitor Tracking Economic Recession and Recovery in America s 100 Largest Metropolitan Areas

Medicare Secondary Payer Rules Tighter Enforcement?

equity advisory services

Europe June Carol Tomé Executive Vice President, Corporate Services & Chief Financial Officer. Diane Dayhoff Vice President, Investor Relations

equity advisory services

Australia/Asia July Diane Dayhoff Vice President, Investor Relations. Lyndsey Burton Senior Manager, Investor Relations

FINANCIAL STATE OF THE CITIES

Struggling to Escape the Fallout of the Great Recession MARISA Di NATALE, MANAGING DIRECTOR

CAPITALIZATION RATES BY PROPERTY TYPE

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/22/ :58 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 95 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/22/2017

State of the U.S. Multifamily Market. Q Review and Forecast

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

NAREIT Investor Conference Summary of Public Storage/Shurgard Merger

ZipRealty, Inc. Supplemental Data Reclassification of Consolidated Statement of Operations

US CAPITAL MARKETS REPORT

The Consequences of Mortgage Credit Expansion. What is the Nature of the Mortgage Default Crisis?

Employee Benefits Alert

INDUSTRIAL REPORT VIEWPOINT 2017 / COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE TRENDS. By: Hugh F. Kelly, PhD, CRE. irr.com. An Integra Realty Resources Publication

Economic Risks and Their Meaning for the Southwest STEVE COCHRANE, MANAGING DIRECTOR

ROBERTA WYN, STEPHANIE TELEKI, AND E. RICHARD BROWN

NFL Funding Comparison

Hotel Valuation and Transaction Trends For the U.S. Lodging Industry

Equity LifeStyle Properties

Carroll Co-Invest Fund II, LP Investor Update, Q4 2013

Tax Rates and Tax Burdens in the District of Columbia - A Nationwide Comparison

Housing Recovery is Underway, But Not for Everyone

Employee Benefits Alert

2018 NORTH AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION FORECAST REPORT

MEETING OF THE WQA ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCE COMMITTEE

CAPITAL MARKETS UPDATE. Suburban Office: Is this the Next Play?

Mattress Firm s Pending Acquisition of Sleepy s November 30, 2015

TRUCKERS APPLICATION

Reverse Market Insight, Inc Acero, Suite 140, Mission Viejo, CA (682) HECM Lenders (FHA Approved Only) Competition Growth -6.

The Housing Market and the Macroeconomy. Karl E. Case. University of North Carolina February 18, 2010

WHAT S IN A (BRAND) NAME? A Comparison Of Minimum Wage Effects on Franchise and Non-Franchise Businesses

D E E P S O U T H O F T E N N E S S E E

CoreLogic Equity Report

The 2017 Housing & Economic Outlook

SPECIALIZED SURETY PRODUCTS

FOCUS On Benefits January, 2007

Financial Experience of Managed Care Organizations Participating in Medicare+Choice

Reverse Market Insight, Inc Acero, Suite 140, Mission Viejo, CA (682) HECM Lenders (FHA Approved Only) Competition Growth -4.

Reverse Market Insight, Inc Acero, Suite 140, Mission Viejo, CA (682) HECM Lenders (FHA Approved Only) Competition Growth -6.

Reverse Market Insight, Inc PCH, Suite D4, Dana Point, CA (682) HECM Lenders (FHA Approved Only) Competition Growth 10.

WA S H I N G TO N / BALT I M O R E

2018 National Electric Rate Study

Reverse Market Insight, Inc PCH, Suite D4, Dana Point, CA (682) HECM Lenders (FHA Approved Only) Competition Growth -6.

Travel Expense Reimbursement Policy

Reverse Market Insight, Inc PCH, Suite D4, Dana Point, CA (682) HECM Lenders (FHA Approved Only) Competition Growth 43.

GWIPP WORKING PAPER SERIES. Have central cities come back? Kimberly Furdell Edward W. (Ned) Hill Harold Wolman

Reverse Market Insight, Inc Acero, Suite 140, Mission Viejo, CA (682) HECM Lenders (FHA Approved Only) Competition Growth -10.

Zurich Surety. Capabilities you can count on

CBRE CAP RATE SURVEY. A CBRE Publication. First Half Click to Enter

Reverse Market Insight, Inc Acero, Suite 140, Mission Viejo, CA (682) HECM Lenders (FHA Approved Only) Competition Growth -6.

Equity Report FOURTH QUARTER 2014

Macroeconomic Overview: The Sunbelt Continues To Shine. Michael Cohen Director of Advisory Services Property & Portfolio Research ULI SOUTH CAROLINA

Reverse Market Insight, Inc PCH, Suite D4, Dana Point, CA (682) HECM Lenders (FHA Approved Only) Competition Growth -20.

Reverse Market Insight, Inc PCH, Suite D4, Dana Point, CA (682) HECM Lenders (FHA Approved Only) Competition Growth -8.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 8, 2012

Maximizing Network Opportunities. March 22, 2018

Capital Markets UpdateTM MULTIFAMILY EDITION SPECIAL FEATURE: SENIOR HOUSING OUTLOOK SECOND QUARTER 2014

Affordable Coverage: Short-Term Health Insurance and the ACA

Fiscal Fact. Sales Tax Rates in Major U.S. Cities. By Scott Drenkard, Alex Raut, and Kevin Duncan. Executive Summary

Reverse Market Insight, Inc Acero, Suite 140, Mission Viejo, CA (682) HECM Lenders (FHA Approved Only) Competition Growth 1.

TEXAS MULTIFAMILY FOLLOW THE MONEY. THE CAPITAL MARKETS PERSPECTIVE Jeanette I. Rice, Americas Head of Investment Research February 12, 2016

Addendum to: The Community Reinvestment Act: A Welcome Anomaly in the Foreclosure Crisis

The Future of Transit in a Fiscally Constrained Political Environment (Draft) By Wendell Cox Principal, Demographia St.

ALERT: HEALTH CARE REFORM BILL

2007 Outlook for Southern California Housing

State Of The U.S. Industrial Market: 2017 Q2

Equity Report THIRD QUARTER 2014

Office of the Chief Economist National Credit Union Administration. Economic Overview. California State Examiner School.

Interested in learning more? Global Information Assurance Certification Paper. Copyright SANS Institute Author Retains Full Rights

TERRORISM RISK INSURANCE PROGRAM 2018 DATA CALL: CAPTIVE INSURERS INSURER GROUP AFFILIATIONS

Traditional Regional Economic Indicators

Addendum to: The Community Reinvestment Act: A Welcome Anomaly in the Foreclosure Crisis

Reverse Market Insight, Inc Acero, Suite 140, Mission Viejo, CA (682) HECM Lenders (FHA Approved Only) Competition Growth 10.

The U.S. and California Is The Recovery Here at Last? UCLA Anderson School of

State National Insurance Company Inc.

Nationwide s Health of Housing Markets (HoHM) Report

Transcription:

cutting through complexity News FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Ann Marie Gorden/Robert Nihen June 24, 2014 KPMG LLP 201-505-6288/201-307-8296 agorden@kpmg.com / rnihen@kpmg.com CINCINNATI, CLEVELAND, ATLANTA SCORE HIGH MARKS AS MOST TAX-FRIENDLY LARGE CITIES FOR BUSINESS: KPMG REPORT New Orleans Has Most Cost-Competitive Tax Structure Among U.S. Mid-Market Cities; Baton Rouge Fares Best in Small-Market Category NEW YORK, June 24 Cleveland, Baltimore and Pittsburgh offer the most favorable tax structures for businesses among U.S. cities/locations with populations exceeding 2 million, according to a study released today by KPMG International (KPMG). Of the 51 large international cities highlighted in the study, Cleveland, Baltimore and Pittsburgh all placed in the top 20 ranking seventh, 11 th, 12 th, 13 th and 14 th, respectively. Among the 10 countries in the study, the U.S. ranked fifth in terms of favorability of its overall tax structure for business. KPMG s 2014 Competitive Alternatives: Focus on Tax study is a global comparison of the total tax burden that companies in 107 cities throughout 10 countries may face, including corporate income taxes, capital taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, miscellaneous local business taxes and statutory labor costs. -more-

KPMG s 2014 Competitive Alternatives Focus on Tax Study 2 While a number of large U.S. cities rank favorably internationally, Cincinnati and Cleveland, in particular, fared well because of Ohio s business tax structure, said Hartley Powell, principal in the Global Location and Expansion Services practice of KPMG LLP, the U.S. member firm of KPMG International. The Buckeye State has no state corporate income tax, low statutory labor costs, and exemptions of personal property and inventory from property tax, providing both of these Ohio cities with relatively low corporate tax burdens. According to the study, Cincinnati had a total tax index of 73.5, representing tax costs 26.5 percent below the U.S. baseline of 100.0, followed by Cleveland (80.2), Atlanta (81.1), Baltimore (81.2) and Pittsburgh (81.9), rounding out the top-five favorable large U.S. cities. Other U.S. cities that ranked in the top 20 among international cities for most cost-competitive tax structure included: Philadelphia (15 th / 84.1) Charlotte, N.C. (16 th / 84.5) Minneapolis (17 th / 88.1) Orlando, Fla. (18th / 88.2) Tampa, Fla. (19 th / 89.1) North Virginia/Metro D.C. (20 th / 89.9) Of particular interest, the study also showed that Louisiana continues to be the leading state with the most cost-competitive tax structure among locations in the study s mid- and small-sized city categories, as Baton Rouge, New Orleans and Shreveport ranked first, second and third, respectively, in the overall results of U.S. cities. -more-

KPMG s 2014 Competitive Alternatives Focus on Tax Study 3 Sector Classifications The 2014 Competitive Alternatives: Focus on Tax report also highlights which cities offer the lowest tax burdens for business based on industry sectors, including digital services, research and development (R&D), corporate services and manufacturing. As a location for digital services, Cincinnati (60.9), Cleveland (62.2), Atlanta (75.1), San Antonio (90.0) and Orlando, Fla. (90.1) topped U.S. cities in the large-city category for most cost-effective tax structures. Atlanta (83.0), Minneapolis (83.6), Cincinnati (86.4), Pittsburgh (88.0) and Detroit (89.0) were the top-five large cities in the R&D sector for most favorable tax structures. The large-sized cities with the most cost-effective tax structures for the corporate services sector included Atlanta (87.5), Cincinnati (88.9), Pittsburgh (89.5), Orlando, Fla. (90.2) and Phoenix (90.7). For manufacturing operations, where property taxes and taxes on equipment and capital are of greater importance, the five large U.S. cities providing the most cost-effective tax structures for business were Baltimore (71.7), Cincinnati (72.3), Pittsburgh (75.9), Charlotte, N.C. (77.7) and Philadelphia (77.8). Corporate services operations usually most closely reflect a location s corporate income tax system, as fewer special tax incentives apply to these activities, said KPMG s Powell. Digital services operations tend to bear a lower burden from other corporate taxes than in other sectors, given their limited costs for property and sales tax, while results for R&D operations are heavily influenced by tax incentives provided for R&D-related activities. -more-

KPMG s 2014 Competitive Alternatives Focus on Tax Study 4 Mid-sized Cities In the mid-sized city category (populations between 1 million to 2 million), cities offering the most favorable tax climate for business were New Orleans (61.0), Trenton, N.J. (80.9), Raleigh, N.C. (82.2), Wilmington, Del. (82.3), and Indianapolis (86.7). Small-sized Cities Cities offering the most favorable tax-structure for business in the small-sized city category (populations under 1 million) were Baton Rouge, La. (60.7), Shreveport, La. (61.1), Omaha, Neb. (70.1), Youngstown, Ohio (72.9), and Bangor, Maine (79.9). The full text of the 2014 study by KPMG International is available online at: http://www.competitivealternatives.com/tax. KPMG s 2014 COMPETITIVE ALTERNATIVES FOCUS ON TAX STUDY (U.S. cities with populations of more than 2 million) City Total Tax Index Rank City Total Tax Index 73.5 1 Denver, CO 93.4 17 Cleveland, 80.2 2 Chicago, IL 93.9 18 81.1 3 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX 94.1 19 Baltimore, MD 81.2 4 Seattle, WA 95.4 20 81.9 5 Riverside-San Bernardino, CA 95.4 21 Philadelphia, 84.1 6 Phoenix, AZ 95.6 22 Charlotte, NC 84.5 7 San Antonio, TX 95.9 23 Minneapolis, MN 88.1 8 San Diego, CA 96.3 24 Orlando, FL 88.2 9 Sacramento, CA 96.6 25 Tampa, FL 89.1 10 Las Vegas, NV 97.1 26 North Virginia, Metro DC 89.9 11 Los Angeles, CA 100.1 27 Detroit, MI 90.0 12 St. Louis, MO 100.7 28 Boston, MA 90.0 13 Kansas City, MO 101.4 29 Miami, FL 91.7 14 San Francisco, CA 102.1 30 Portland, OR 92.5 15 New York City 111.8 31 Houston, TX 93.2 16 The total tax index is a measure of the total taxes paid by corporations in a particular location and industry, expressed as a percentage of total taxes paid by similar corporations in the United States baseline cities (New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago and Dallas-Fort Worth). Thus the United States has a total tax index of 100.0, which represents the benchmark against which the other countries and cities are scored. Rank

About KPMG LLP KPMG LLP, the audit, tax and advisory firm (www.kpmg.com/us), is the U.S. member firm of KPMG International Cooperative ( KPMG International ). KPMG International s member firms have 155,000 people, including more than 8,600 partners, in 155 countries. -0-

2014 Competitive Alternatives: Focus on Tax report The study s Total Tax Index is a measure of the total taxes paid by corporations in a particular location and industry, expressed as a percentage of total taxes paid by similar corporations in the United States baseline cities (New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago and Dallas-Fort Worth). Thus the United States has a total tax index of 100.0, which represents the benchmark against which the other countries and cities are scored. TOTAL TAX INDEX BY SIZE Bangor Wilmington Pittsburgh Omaha Cleveland Trenton Youngstown Indianapolis Cincinnati Baltimore Atlanta Raleigh Shreveport Baton Rouge New Orleans Large (population >2 million): Cleveland, (73.5) (80.2) (81.1) New Orleans, LA (61.0) Baton Rouge, LA (60.7) Mid (population 1-2 million): Trenton, NJ Raleigh, NC Baltimore, MD (81.2) Wilmington, DE (81.9) Indianapolis, IN (80.9) (82.2) (82.3) (86.7) Small (population <1 million): Shreveport, LA Omaha, NE (61.1) (70.1) Youngstown, Bangor, ME (72.9) (79.9) Digital Services (large cities; >2 population): Minneapolis (60.9) Cleveland, (62.2) (75.1) San Antonio, TX Orlando, FL (90.0) (90.1) TOTAL TAX INDEX BY INDUSTRY TOTAL TAX INDEX BY TOP INTERNATIONAL CITIES Phoenix Top 51 major International cities by country San Antonio Canada 3 Detroit Cincinnati United States 31 Mexico 2 Pittsburgh Philadelphia Cleveland Atlanta Orlando Baltimore Charlotte United Kingdom 2 France 2 Netherlands 2 Italy 2 (83.0) (87.5) Baltimore, MD (71.7) Germany 2 Research & Development (large cities; >2 population): Minneapolis, MN (83.6) (86.4) Australia 3 (88.0) (89.0) Corporate Services (large cities; >2 population): (88.9) (89.5) Orlando, FL Manufacturing (large cities; >2 population): (72.3) (75.9) Japan 2 Detroit, MI Phoenix, AZ (90.2) (90.7) Charlotte, NC Philadelphia, (77.7) (77.8) 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ( KPMG International ), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. The KPMG name, logo and cutting through complexity are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International. NDPPS 285421