FY2016 True Up Overview

Similar documents
Budget Process Overview and Cost Allocation Methodology

Special Audit & Budget Review Meeting: FY16/17 Budget June 23, 2016

FY15/16 DRAFT OPERATING

FY 15/16 OPERATING BUDGET-IN-BRIEF

May 31, 2016 Financial Report

August 31, 2016 Financial Report

PRESENTATION TITLE TRANSLINK ASSET MANAGEMENT PROJECT. Title sub text if required. Vikki Kwan, TransLink

February 2016 Financial Report

CHAPTER 7: Financial Plan

BUDGET-IN-BRIEF APPROVED BUDGET FOR THE 2015 FISCAL YEAR EMERGING AS THE MOST CUSTOMER-DRIVEN AND EFFICIENT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AGENCY IN VIRGINIA

FY2018 Proposed Operating Budget Audit/Budget Committee Meeting May 25, 2017

Governor s FY 2018 Revised, FY 2019 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 12, 2018

April 30, 2016 Financial Report

Financial Report Fiscal Year 2018

MARTA 2009 Budget Summary Review

Solano County Transit

Federal Assistance 13% Charges for Services 5% Appropriated Fund Balance.5% Other 3% Administration 6% Building Maintenance 3% Other 2%

FY17 FY16 Valley Metro RPTA Sources of Funds FY17 vs FY16

Public Transit Services Summary of Submitted 2015 Budget From Rates

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview

POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

BUDGET-IN-BRIEF APPROVED BUDGET FOR THE 2014 FISCAL YEAR EMERGING AS THE MOST CUSTOMER-DRIVEN AND EFFICIENT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AGENCY IN VIRGINIA

PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2011 BUDGET. Testimony of. Richard Sarles, General Manager. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.

Governor s FY 2019 Revised, FY 2020 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 9, 2019

Whatcom Transportation Authority

Valley Metro Fiscal Year 2014 Financial Results. Budget and Finance Subcommittee October 9, 2014

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Monthly Performance & Financial Report For Period Ending October 31, 2012 Soft Close

Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee June 22, 2015 and July 13, 2015

Governor s FY 2017 Revised, FY 2018 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 12, 2017

CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION December 31, 2011 and 2010 (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

VALLEY METRO RPTA FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Financial Report Fiscal Year 2018

METRO. Fiscal Year 2014 Monthly Board Report. May 2014

2017 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROGRESS REPORT

FY2017 Budget Work Session

Board Chair Ron Daily and Members Omnitrans Board of Directors FISCAL YEAR ANNUAL BUDGET EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Operating Budget. Third Quarter Financial Report (July 2005 March 2006)

CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION December 31, 2010 and 2009 (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

METRO. Fiscal Year 2012 Monthly Board Report. September 2012 (Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

Financial Outlook for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Birmingham-Jefferson County Transit Authority P.O. Box Birmingham, AL Phone: (205) Fax: (205)

2019 MANAGEMENT & FINANCIAL PLAN

Greater Portland Transit District 114 Valley Street Portland ME 04102

8.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, COLORADO

Whatcom Transportation Authority

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Page

Transportation Finance Overview. Presentation Contents

FY2014 Operating Budget Performance Report

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2018 TRANSIT SUMMIT INFORMATION ITEM. Countywide

METRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. January 2013

EASTERN SIERRA TRANSIT AUTHORITY ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S THEREON. June 30, 2016

AGENDA ITEM 2 A Action Item. Motor Coach Industries Procurement Funding

JANUARY FY Monthly Financial and Operational Report. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, COLORADO AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015

OCTOBER FY Monthly Financial and Operational Report. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority

CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

FISCAL YEAR 2009 ACTUAL AND MID-YEAR 2010 SPENDING

Financial Report - FY 2017 Year to Date May 31, 2017

Adopted 2018 OPERATING BUDGET Two-Year Financial Plan and Five-Year CAPITAL PROGRAM

FTA Rural and Tribal NTD Overview and Updates. December 12, 2018

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates

FTA TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT NPRM

Financial Plan. Section 8 STATUS QUO PLAN STATUS QUO PLAN ASSUMPTIONS STATUS QUO PLAN BUDGET ITEMS

FY2017 Year-End Financial Update

METRO MONTHLY BOARD REPORT

CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY PRESIDENT S FY2017 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS. Analysis and Recommendations

Operating Budget. Second Quarter Financial Report

MEETING OF THE SAN DIEGO METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM BUDGET DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. April 26, :00 AM

Portal North Bridge Project Hudson County, New Jersey Core Capacity Project Development (Rating Assigned February 2017)

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

CAPITAL TRANSIT MISSION STATEMENT FY13 PROPOSED BUDGET $6,707,900 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CORE SERVICES FUNDING SOURCES FOR CAPITAL TRANSIT

METRO. Fiscal Year 2012 Monthly Board Report. December 2011 (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

Governor s FY 2016 Revised, FY 2017 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 13, 2016

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

FY2020 Budget Outlook

Funding. Leading the Nation in Transportation Excellence

FY2017 Budget Guidance

Memphis Urban Area- Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Policy Board Meeting. August 23, 2018

New York City Transit

Spokane Transit Authority Adopted 2019 Operating and Capital Budgets. November 15, 2018 Board Meeting Resolution Number:

Operating Budget Stability

Rail Modernization Study REPORT TO CONGRESS. April Prepared by: Federal Transit Administration

Program Evaluation and Audit COUNTY CONTRACTOR ADA COST REVIEW DARTS AND SCOTT COUNTY

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at June 2014 compared to June 2013.

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

California MAP-21 Transit Working Group: MAP-21 Questions for FTA

PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY KEY BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016

Whatcom Transportation Authority. Annual Budget. WTA Draft Budget 1

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates

Responses to Committee Requests

IBO. Running on Empty: The MTA s 2005 Budget and Financial Plan. The Road to Adopting New York City s Budget. Revised and updated...

JANUARY 2019 FISCAL YEAR 2019 FINANCIAL REPORT

Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2010 July 1, 2009 June 30, 2010

METRO. Fiscal Year Monthly Performance Report. Revenue Expense Ridership Performance. November 2018 (Third Quarter Fiscal Year-to Date)

Transit Development Plan (FY ) Executive Summary

Financial Report Fiscal Year 2018

The Highway Trust Fund Cliff: Its Impact on Public Transportation

Transcription:

FY2016 True Up Overview

Basis for Budgeting HRT s dependency on federal, state and local budgetary decisions guides revenue and. expenditure estimates. Both are based on the best available information during budget preparation. HRT s annual budget differs from that of a local government due to the uncertain nature of grant awards from other entities and utilization of public transit. HRT currently utilizes a line of credit for daily operations to address the uncertainty of the timing and arrival of grant awards HRT does not have a dedicated revenue source for capital and/or operating funds. Overly Dependent on Local Contribution Overly Reliant on Federal Support Lack of a Rainy Day Fund No Dedicated Funding No Ability to Address Budgetary Shortfalls 2

Cost Allocation Agreement (CAA) Overview Major Guiding Principles (paraphrased) HRT will operate a consolidated regional public transportation system within and between the Participating Cities. Each participating city will have final determination on the type, amount and location of public transportation service provided within its borders. To recognize the distinct characteristics of each cities and to insure that each city is equitably allocated only the net cost of providing public transportation services for its citizens, separate operating cost and passenger revenue allocation formulas will be used. 3

Revenue Overview

Ridership Impact Ridership decline resulted in a farebox revenue shortfall: Revenue from ridership is projected based on the most recently completed fiscal year. FY14 year-end results were used to develop FY16 budget. Full year of a fare adjustment also budgeted in FY16. As an agency, ridership trended downward, by mode, 13%-bus, 12%- light rail, and 27%-Ferry as compared 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 DR Ferry Light Rail Bus FY16 Target FY16 Actual to the target. Budget Actual Fav(Unfav) % Revenue $ 22,075,000 $ 19,653,533 $ (2,421,467) -12.3% 5

Expense Overview

Budgetary Challenges Millions $45 $40. $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $ Budget Actual Staffing requirements that exceeded current staffing levels and higher than anticipated turnover rate of operators. Overtime is utilized to sustain daily operations, on a temporary basis. The recruitment process (posting and selection, pre-employment process, onboarding, and training) for bus operators generally takes six (6) months. Budget Actual Fav(Unfav) % Personnel $ 39,585,343 $ 42,049,347 $ (2,464,004) -6.2% 7

Budgetary Challenges Millions $45 $40. $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $ Budget Actual Budget Actual Fav(Unfav) % Fringe Benefits $ 16,684,043 $ 19,646,257 $ (2,962,214) -17.8% HRT experienced a higher than anticipated utilization of pay and nonpay fringe benefits. More employees opted into the health insurance program than projected. Higher than projected usage of paid leave. Non Pay Fringe Benefits consist of health insurance, retirement, pension, dental, DOT physicals, drug and alcohol testing, Naval Base pass badge access, operator uniforms and mechanic tool allowance. 8

Budgetary Challenges Millions $45 $40. $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $ Budget Actual Budget Actual Fav(Unfav) % Material & Supplies $ 4,973,606 $ 6,679,850 $ (1,706,244) -34.3% Maintenance costs were higher than anticipated due to maintaining a 10 year old and aging bus fleet. The average useful life of a transit bus is roughly 12 years. State of Good Repair (SGR) per FTA is 6-7 years-old. Would need to purchase 25 buses per year to maintain SGR Older buses are more expensive to maintain tend to be less reliable Parts needed to repair them are more expensive 9

Budgetary Challenges Other Notable Budgetary Challenges Flat or moderate growth in Federal and State funding. Increased regulatory and oversight requirements State of Good Repair (SGR) Transit Asset Management (TAM) Safety Title VI Compliance DOT Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Historically low consumer gas price per gallon 2016 prices were the lowest in 12 years Anemic job growth/recovery 0.46% - Hampton Roads 1.92% - U.S. Metro Area Average Additional amenities and services (transit center, shelters, benches, trash receptacles, landscape maintenance) procured or requested by localities. 10

Cost Allocation Agreement (CAA) Overview Major Guiding Principles (paraphrased) Calculation Of Local Share Of Operating Costs Farebox revenue is captured by route and/or city and subtracted from service costs to determine if a deficit exists. If a deficit exists, federal aid (FA) and state aid (SA) will be applied. If funds are required after farebox revenue, FA and SA and any other assistance are applied to costs, the city approving services will provide the funds. Expense Total Service Cost Revenue Fares Federal State = Local Funding $2.7M $2.4M $0 $0 $5.1M 11

Recap HRT s dependency on federal, state and local budgetary decisions guides revenue and expenditure. estimates. Both are based on the best available information during budget preparation. HRT s annual budget differs from that of a local government due to the uncertain nature of grant awards from other entities and utilization of public transit. HRT currently utilizes a line of credit for daily operations to address the uncertainty of the timing and arrival of of grant awards HRT does not have a dedicated revenue source for capital and/or operating funds. In summary, HRT begins each fiscal year with $0 and ends the fiscal year with $0 Overly Dependent on Local Contribution Overly Reliant on Federal Support Lack of a Rainy Day Fund No Dedicated Funding No Ability to Address Budgetary Shortfalls 12

Your Help is Needed Correcting the Structural Imbalance to Foster Financial Flexibility and Fiscal Strength Amend the Cost Allocation Agreement to allow for the creation of and maintaining an unassigned reserve fund. Help find a regional funding source for transit operations and capital acquisition. Continued commitment to maintain and/or increase funding for HRT s SHIFT program. Reduce the reliance on Federal capital funding that is currently used to offset daily operations. 13

FY2016 True Up Overview