UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv JBS-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/02/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case 1:09-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/23/09 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv RGA Document 167 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 9250 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:15-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:10-cv WHW -MAS Document 23 Filed 03/18/11 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 97

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/10/16 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:12-cv CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 06/15/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 0:13-cv RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/01/2013 Page 1 of 21

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/12/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/12/2017 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:13-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2017

Case 2:17-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:17-cv JMV-SCM Document 1 Filed 08/01/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ECF CASE DEFENDANTS ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/03/ :08 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/03/2016

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:07-cv DAB Document 1 Filed 02/23/2007 Page 1 of C. Defendants. X. Class Action Complaint

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHILTON COUNTY, ALABAMA

Case No.: CLASS ACTION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT, 15 U.S.C. 1692, ET SEQ.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 11

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/30/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

8:18-cv DCC Date Filed 01/03/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 141 Filed: 12/06/17 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1455

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/19/17 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/11/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2016

Case 4:16-cv RGE-SBJ Document 59 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:18-cv SJF-AYS Document 3 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 7

Case 1:18-cv MKB-RML Document 5 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 14

Case 1:12-cv LO-JFA Document 1 Filed 04/26/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID# 64

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CIVIL DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv LTS-DCF Document 1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CASE NO.

Case 4:18-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/04/18 Page 1 of 13

Case 0:14-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2014 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2018

Case 1:13-cv PLM Doc #8 Filed 12/23/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID#44

Case 4:10-cv TSH Document 1 Filed 07/09/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/25/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2014 EXHIBIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA Northern Division COMPLAINT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SOUGHT

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 111 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1029

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Civil Action No. 09-CV-367

Case 9:18-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/2018 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE#

Case 3:16-cv MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 3:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/20/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.

Case 1:17-cv VSB Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUFFOLK FLANAGAN & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, MURACA & KELLY LLP, DENNIS KELLY, DAVID GROSSMAN, and SUZANNE FLANAGAN,

Case 1:18-cv LDH-CLP Document 1 Filed 05/23/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 FILED IN CLERK'S OFFICE US DISTRICT COURT E.D.N.

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/19/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. Plaintiff Board of Education of the City of Chicago (the School Board ), by and through

Case 1:18-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/20/2018 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 12/18/18 Page 1 of 9. Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 1:12-cv ELH Document 1 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/18 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1

Case 2:06-cv JWL-DJW Document 1 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 12/08/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE JUDGMENT

Case 0:17-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2017 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/21/2008 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/05/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), for its Complaint against

Case 1:19-cv DLI-SJB Document 1 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/ /24/ :33 02:50 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2016

Case KG Doc 1 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

u.s. District Court Northern District of Indiana [LIVE]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff R.J. Zayed ( Plaintiff or Receiver ), through his undersigned counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. Case No.

Patents and the Polymorph

Case 3:12-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 08/21/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

2:17-cv AJT-SDD Doc # 1 Filed 07/11/17 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Case No.

Case 1:17-cv MJW Document 5 Filed 03/03/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10

ORIGINAL. -l^ K CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 2 '7 L'I FEB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

document 1 ) ) ) ) ) fi...f. *l 7,n bi'o~ COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

ALFRED BRANDON and JUDAH BROWN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Index No /2015

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv SMV-WPL Document 1 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:18-cv STV Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

2:13-cv CWH Date Filed 06/26/13 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Case 7:18-cv NSR Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED vs.

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/14 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

Transcription:

Case 1:14-cv-07934-PAC Document 1 Filed 10/01/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Kowa Company, Ltd., Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., and Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd., Civileti on N. 9 3 4 Plaintiffs,. V. Apotex, Inc. and Apotex Corp., Defendants. Plaintiffs, Kowa Company, Ltd. ("KCL"), Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. ("KPA")(collectively, "Kowa"), and Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd. ("NCI") by their undersigned counsel, for their Complaint against defendants Apotex, Inc. and Apotex Corp. (collectively, "Apotex"), allege as follows: Jurisdiction and Venue 1. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, Title.35, United States Code and arising under 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(2) and 281-283. Subject matter jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)-(c) and 1400(b). Personal jurisdiction over the defendants in New York is proper under N.Y. C.P.L.R. 301 and 302(a) and because defendants are doing business in this jurisdiction.

Case 1:14-cv-07934-PAC Document 1 Filed 10/01/14 Page 2 of 7 Parties 2. KCL is a Japanese corporation having its corporate headquarters and principal place of business in Aichi, Japan. KPA is a wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of KCL. KPA has its corporate headquarters and principal place of business in Montgomery, Alabama and is organized under the laws of Delaware. 3. NCI is a Japanese corporation having its corporate headquarters and principal place of business in Tokyo, Japan. 4. KCL and NCI are engaged in the business of research, developing, manufacturing, and marketing of a broad spectrum of innovative pharmaceutical products, including Livalo. On information and belief, Apotex, Inc. is a company organized and existing under the laws of Canada, having its principal place of business at 150 Signet Drive, Toronto, Ontario M9L 1T9. 6. On information and belief, Apotex Corp. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal place of business at 2400 North Commerce Parkway, Suite 400, Weston, Florida 33326. On information and belief, Apotex Corp. is responsible for sales and marketing of Apotex, Inc. products in the United States. On information and belief, Apotex Corp. also acts as Apotex Inc.'s United States agent for purposes of making regulatory submissions, including ANDAs, to the United States Food and Drug Administration. 7. Upon information and belief, Apotex Inc. has actual control over the activities of Apotex Corp. including Apotex Corp.'s filing of ANDA No. 20-6068. 8. Upon information and belief, Apotex sells generic drugs throughout the United States, including at least in New York. 2

Case 1:14-cv-07934-PAC Document 1 Filed 10/01/14 Page 3 of 7 9. Upon information and belief, Apotex is currently transacting business in the Southern District of New York, at least by making and shipping into this Judicial District, or by using, offering to sell or selling or by causing others to use, offer to sell or sell, pharmaceutical products Upon information and belief, Apotex Corp. distributes drug products manufactured by Apotex, Inc. throughout the United States, including at least in the State of New York. Upon information and belief, Apotex derives substantial revenue from interstate and/or international commerce, including substantial revenue from goods used or consumed or services rendered in the State of New York and the Southern District of New York. By filing its ANDA, Apotex has committed, and unless enjoined, will continue to commit a tortious act without the State of New York, which Apotex expects or should reasonably expect to have consequences in the State of New York including in this Judicial District. In addition, Apotex previously consented to, and availed itself of, this jurisdiction by having filed lawsuits before this United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The New Drug Application 10. KPA sells drug products containing pitavastatin calcium (the "pitavastatin drug product") under the trade name Livalo in the United States pursuant to the United States Food and Drug Administration's approval of a New Drug Application ("NDA") held by KCL (NDA No. 22-363). 11. Livalo is approved for use as an adjunctive therapy to diet to reduce elevated total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, triglycerides, and to increase HDL-C in adult patients with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia. 12. The approval letter for Livalo, with approved labeling, was issued by the FDA on August 3, 2009. 3

Case 1:14-cv-07934-PAC Document 1 Filed 10/01/14 Page 4 of 7 approved. 13. Certain amendments to the approved labeling for Livalo have subsequently been The Patents in Suit 14. United States Patent No. 8,557,993 ("the '993 patent"), entitled "Crystalline Forms of Pitavastatin Calcium," a true and correct copy of which is appended hereto as Exhibit A, was duly issued on October 15, 2013 to inventors Paul Adriaan Van Der Schaaf, Fritz Blatter, Martin Szelagiewicz, and Kai-Uwe Schoening, and ultimately was assigned to plaintiff NCI. The '993 patent claims, inter alia, crystalline polymorphs or the amorphous form of pitavastatin - or processes for preparing the same. 15. Plaintiff NCI has been and still is the owner through assignment of the '993 patent, which expires on February 2, 2024. KCL is NCI's licensee for the '993 patent and KPA holds a license from KCL for the '993 patent. 16. In accordance with its license, KPA sells the pitavastatin drug product under the trade name Livalo in the United States. Sales of Livale are made pursuant to approval by the FDA of NDA No. 22-363. 17. Plaintiff KCL manufactures the Livalo drug products as sold by ICPA. 18. Plaintiffs Kowa and NCI will be substantially and irreparably harmed by infringement of the '993 patent. There is no adequate remedy at law. COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF THE '993 PATENT UNDER 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(2)(A) 19. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate herein by reference the allegations contained in each of the foregoing paragraphs. 4

Case 1:14-cv-07934-PAC Document 1 Filed 10/01/14 Page 5 of 7 20. Upon information and belief, defendant Apotex filed an Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA") with the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") under 21 U.S.C. 355(j) (ANDA No. 20-6068) seeking approval to market 1 mg, 2 mg, and 4 mg tablets comprising pitavastatin calcium. 21. By this ANDA filing, Apotex has indicated that it intends to engage, and that there is substantial likelihood that it will engage, in the commercial manufacture, importation, use, offer for sale, and/or sale, or inducement thereof, of plaintiffs' patented pitavastatin drug product immediately or imminently upon receiving FDA approval to do so. Also by its ANDA filing, Apotex has indicated that its pitavastatin drug product is bioequivalent to Plaintiffs' pitavastatin drug product. 22. By its ANDA filing, Apotex seeks to obtain approval to commercially manufacture, use, import, offer for sale, and/or sell, alleged generic equivalents of Plaintiffs' Livalo pitavastatin drug product prior to the expiration date of the '993 patent. 23. By a letter dated August 18, 2014 (the "Notice Letter"), Apotex informed Kowa and NCI that Apotex had filed a certification to the FDA, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 355(j)(2)(B)(iv)(I). On or about August 19, 2014, KPA received the Notice Letter. On or about August 21, 2014, KCL and NCI received the Notice Letter. 24. Apotex's Notice Letter, purporting to be Apotex's Notice of Certification under 21 U.S.C. 355(j)(2)(B)(ii), indicates that Apotex intends to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, or sale of its proposed pitavastatin drug product prior to the expiration of the '993 patent. 5

Case 1:14-cv-07934-PAC Document 1 Filed 10/01/14 Page 6 of 7 25. The Notice Letter asserts that in Apotex's opinion, the '993 patent purportedly is "invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use or sale of the drug product described in Apotex's ANDA." 26. Apotex's filing of ANDA No. 20-6068 for the purpose of obtaining FDA approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, importation, offer for sale and/or sale, or the inducement thereof, of its proposed pitavastatin drug product before the expiration of the '993 patent is an act of infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(2)(A). 27. Apotex's manufacture, use, importation, offer for sale, sale, and/or importation of its proposed pitavastatin drug product will directly infringe or induce infringement Of at least one claim of the '993 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(2)(A). 28. Unless Apotex is enjoined from infringing the '993 patent, plaintiffs will suffer substantial and irreparable injury. Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request the following relief: (a) a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2201 et seq. that making, using, selling, offering to sell and/or importing Apotex's pitavastatin drug product for which it seeks FDA approval or any drag product containing pitavastatin will infringe at least one claim of the '993 patent; (b) a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2201 et seq. and an order pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(4)(A) providing that the effective date of any FDA approval for Apotex to commercially make, use, sell, offer to sell or import its pitavastatin drug product or any drug product containing pitavastatin be no earlier than the date following the expiration date of the '993 patent; 6

Case 1:14-cv-07934-PAC Document 1 Filed 10/01/14 Page 7 of 7 (c) a permanent injunction restraining and enjoining against any infringement by defendants, their officers, agents, attorneys, employees, successors or assigns, or those acting in privity or concert with them, of the '993 patent, through the commercial manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale or importation into the United States of Apotex's pitavastatin drug product or any drug product containing pitavastatin, and/or any inducement of the same; (d) (e) Attorneys' fees in this action under 35 U.S.C. 285; and such further and other relief in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants as this Court may deem just and proper. Dated: New York, New York October 1, 2014 Kowa Company, Ltd., Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., and Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd. By their attorneys, 4 Joseph E. 62erniawski WORMSER, KIELY, GALEF & JACOBS LLP 825 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 687-4900 7