ROM SIMULATION Exact Moment Simulation using Random Orthogonal Matrices

Similar documents
ROM Simulation: Applications to Stress Testing and VaR

ROM Simulation with Exact Means, Covariances, and Multivariate Skewness

No-Arbitrage ROM Simulation

The rth moment of a real-valued random variable X with density f(x) is. x r f(x) dx

Modeling Co-movements and Tail Dependency in the International Stock Market via Copulae

12. Conditional heteroscedastic models (ARCH) MA6622, Ernesto Mordecki, CityU, HK, 2006.

UQ, STAT2201, 2017, Lectures 3 and 4 Unit 3 Probability Distributions.

A New Multivariate Kurtosis and Its Asymptotic Distribution

On the Distribution of Multivariate Sample Skewness for Assessing Multivariate Normality

STRESS-STRENGTH RELIABILITY ESTIMATION

Some Simple Stochastic Models for Analyzing Investment Guarantees p. 1/36

Market Risk Analysis Volume I

Section The Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean

MEASURING PORTFOLIO RISKS USING CONDITIONAL COPULA-AR-GARCH MODEL

Modelling Returns: the CER and the CAPM

IEOR E4602: Quantitative Risk Management

GENERATING DAILY CHANGES IN MARKET VARIABLES USING A MULTIVARIATE MIXTURE OF NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS. Jin Wang

On the Distribution of Kurtosis Test for Multivariate Normality

1. Covariance between two variables X and Y is denoted by Cov(X, Y) and defined by. Cov(X, Y ) = E(X E(X))(Y E(Y ))

Simulating the loss distribution of a corporate bond portfolio

Market Risk Analysis Volume IV. Value-at-Risk Models

Sampling Distribution

MATH 3200 Exam 3 Dr. Syring

An Information Based Methodology for the Change Point Problem Under the Non-central Skew t Distribution with Applications.

ECON Introductory Econometrics. Lecture 1: Introduction and Review of Statistics

Stochastic Volatility (SV) Models

Unit 5: Sampling Distributions of Statistics

Technical Note: An Improved Range Chart for Normal and Long-Tailed Symmetrical Distributions

Unit 5: Sampling Distributions of Statistics

Bivariate Birnbaum-Saunders Distribution

Objective Bayesian Analysis for Heteroscedastic Regression

Extend the ideas of Kan and Zhou paper on Optimal Portfolio Construction under parameter uncertainty

RISKMETRICS. Dr Philip Symes

The Vasicek Distribution

ADVANCED OPERATIONAL RISK MODELLING IN BANKS AND INSURANCE COMPANIES

Risk management. VaR and Expected Shortfall. Christian Groll. VaR and Expected Shortfall Risk management Christian Groll 1 / 56

Robust portfolio optimization under multiperiod mean-standard deviation criterion

Business Statistics 41000: Probability 3

Lecture 5: Fundamentals of Statistical Analysis and Distributions Derived from Normal Distributions

Week 1 Quantitative Analysis of Financial Markets Distributions B

Chapter 5 Univariate time-series analysis. () Chapter 5 Univariate time-series analysis 1 / 29

Bloomberg. Portfolio Value-at-Risk. Sridhar Gollamudi & Bryan Weber. September 22, Version 1.0

Hedging under Model Uncertainty

The Fundamental Review of the Trading Book: from VaR to ES

Financial Econometrics (FinMetrics04) Time-series Statistics Concepts Exploratory Data Analysis Testing for Normality Empirical VaR

Asymptotic methods in risk management. Advances in Financial Mathematics

IEOR E4703: Monte-Carlo Simulation

Financial Risk Management

CPSC 540: Machine Learning

Risk Management and Time Series

Lecture 6: Non Normal Distributions

ON JARQUE-BERA TESTS FOR ASSESSING MULTIVARIATE NORMALITY

Financial Econometrics Notes. Kevin Sheppard University of Oxford

Estimating the Parameters of Closed Skew-Normal Distribution Under LINEX Loss Function

Lecture outline. Monte Carlo Methods for Uncertainty Quantification. Importance Sampling. Importance Sampling

A comment on Christoffersen, Jacobs and Ornthanalai (2012), Dynamic jump intensities and risk premiums: Evidence from S&P500 returns and options

Determining source cumulants in femtoscopy with Gram-Charlier and Edgeworth series

P VaR0.01 (X) > 2 VaR 0.01 (X). (10 p) Problem 4

On Complexity of Multistage Stochastic Programs

CPSC 540: Machine Learning

Geostatistical Inference under Preferential Sampling

A Bayesian Control Chart for the Coecient of Variation in the Case of Pooled Samples

Loss Simulation Model Testing and Enhancement

A Correlated Sampling Method for Multivariate Normal and Log-normal Distributions

STAT 830 Convergence in Distribution

Introduction Dickey-Fuller Test Option Pricing Bootstrapping. Simulation Methods. Chapter 13 of Chris Brook s Book.

Saddlepoint Approximation Methods for Pricing. Financial Options on Discrete Realized Variance

The Use of the Tukey s g h family of distributions to Calculate Value at Risk and Conditional Value at Risk

A potentially useful approach to model nonlinearities in time series is to assume different behavior (structural break) in different subsamples

Alternative VaR Models

Review: Population, sample, and sampling distributions

CHAPTER II LITERATURE STUDY

Asset Allocation Model with Tail Risk Parity

The histogram should resemble the uniform density, the mean should be close to 0.5, and the standard deviation should be close to 1/ 12 =

A Comparison Between Skew-logistic and Skew-normal Distributions

Applications of Good s Generalized Diversity Index. A. J. Baczkowski Department of Statistics, University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Dependence Modeling and Credit Risk

Lecture 6: Risk and uncertainty

Scenario-Based Value-at-Risk Optimization

A1. Relating Level and Slope to Expected Inflation and Output Dynamics

Monte Carlo Investigations

Limit Theorems for the Empirical Distribution Function of Scaled Increments of Itô Semimartingales at high frequencies

Calibration of Interest Rates

Market Risk VaR: Model- Building Approach. Chapter 15

Value at Risk and Self Similarity

Fat tails and 4th Moments: Practical Problems of Variance Estimation

ANALYSIS OF THE BINOMIAL METHOD

Computational Finance Binomial Trees Analysis

A Robust Test for Normality

Equity correlations implied by index options: estimation and model uncertainty analysis

A general approach to calculating VaR without volatilities and correlations

A Macro-Finance Model of the Term Structure: the Case for a Quadratic Yield Model

Alexander Marianski August IFRS 9: Probably Weighted and Biased?

European option pricing under parameter uncertainty

RESEARCH ARTICLE. The Penalized Biclustering Model And Related Algorithms Supplemental Online Material

discussion Papers Some Flexible Parametric Models for Partially Adaptive Estimators of Econometric Models

IEOR E4703: Monte-Carlo Simulation

Downside Risk: Implications for Financial Management Robert Engle NYU Stern School of Business Carlos III, May 24,2004

Statistical Inference and Methods

Market Risk Analysis Volume II. Practical Financial Econometrics

Transcription:

ROM SIMULATION Exact Moment Simulation using Random Orthogonal Matrices Bachelier Finance Society Meeting Toronto 2010 Henley Business School at Reading Contact Author : d.ledermann@icmacentre.ac.uk Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 1 / 20

Outline Contents ROM Simulation ROM Simulation Properties Applications in Finance Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 2 / 20

ROM Simulation Introduction: Motivation Simulating a N(µ n,σ n ) multivariate sample X mn (Monte Carlo): Simulate standard normal Z mn = (z ij ), where z ij = Φ 1 (p ij ), p ij U[0,1] and Φ is the standard normal c.d.f Set X mn = 1 m µ n + Z mn A n where A na n = Σ n and 1 m = (1,...,1) Problem: Error in sample moments M(X mn ) = m 1 1 mx mn V (X mn ) = m 1 (X mn 1 m M(X mn )) (X mn 1 m M(X mn )) That is, particularly when m is small M(X mn ) µ n and V (X mn ) Σ n Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 3 / 20

ROM Simulation ROM Simulations Solution: Replace Z mn with an L-matrix satisfying L nml mn = I n and 1 ml mn = 0 n e.g Apply Gram-Schmidt (GS) orthogonalisation Exact Mean-Covariance Sample: ROM Simulations where X mn = 1 m µ n + m 1 2Q m L mn R n A n A n A n = Σ n R n is a random orthogonal matrix (ROM) Q m is a permutation satisfying 1 mq m = 1 m Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 4 / 20

ROM Simulation ROM Simulated Paths Different ROMs, applied to the same L-matrix, lead to different samples: 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Variable 1 (no ROM) Variable 2 (no ROM) Variable 1 (with ROM) Variable 2 (with ROM) 0.8 0 5 10 15 20 25 Figure: Both simulations based on the same multivariate normal sample. The solid lines show the paths from the first simulation (no ROM) and the dashed lines show the second simulation (with ROM). Path correlation is 0.75. Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 5 / 20

L-Matrix Types ROM Simulation Parametric: Orthogonalisation of a zero mean parametric sample ROM Simulation (small) adjustment to Monte Carlo Data Specific: Orthogonalise a collection of data (mean deviations) ROM Simulation infinitely many historical samples Deterministic: Orthogonalise linearly independent vectors v j = (0,...,0,1, 1,...,1, 1,0,...,0) GS L k }{{}}{{} mn j 1 2k L 1 mn relates to Helmertian (1876) matrices; k > 1 are new ROM Simulation target higher multivariate moments Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 6 / 20

Outline ROM Simulation Properties ROM Simulation ROM Simulation Properties Applications in Finance Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 7 / 20

ROM Simulation Properties Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis We employ the multivariate measures introduced by Mardia (1970) Skewness: m m τ M (X mn ) = m 2 { (xi µ n)v (X mn ) 1 (x j µ n) } 3 i=1 j=1 Kurtosis: m κ M (X mn ) = m 1 { (xi µ n)v (X mn ) 1 (x i µ n) } 2 i=1 Key Property is invariance under non-singular affine transformations: τ M (X mn ) = τ M (1 m b n + X mn B n ) κ M (X mn ) = κ M (1 m b n + X mnb n ) Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 8 / 20

ROM Simulation Properties Skewness and Kurtosis of ROM Simulations ROM simulations are (random) affine transformations of L-matrices Parametric: Multivariate normal case E[τ M (L mn )] = n(n + 1)(n + 2)m 1 E[κ M (L mn )] = n(n + 2)(m 1)(m + 1) 1 Data Specific: ROM simulation moments identical to historical data Deterministic: When k = 1 τ M (L 1 mn) = n [ (m 3) + (m n) 1] κ M (L 1 mn) = n [ (m 2) + (m n) 1] When k > 1 Moments available numerically Calibrate m (and k) for moment targeting Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 9 / 20

ROM Simulation Properties Orthogonal Matrices Recall: ROM simulation equation X mn = 1 m µ + m 1 2Q m L mn R n A n Q m are (cyclic) permutation matrices R n are combinations of the following random orthogonal matrix types (1) Sign Matrices: R n = diag { ( 1) d 1,...,( 1) dn} where d k Bin(1,p k ) (2) Upper Hessenberg Rotations: R n = G n (θ 1 )G n (θ 2 )... G n (θ n 1 ) where G n (θ j ) are Givens (1958) rotations From a random skew-symmetric matrix, satisfying S n = S n, we form (3) Cayley (1846) Rotations: R n = (I n S n ) 1 (I n + S n ) (4) Exponential Rotations: R n = exp(s n ) Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 10 / 20

ROM Simulation Properties ROM Simulation Densities: Rotation Effects 1000 Deterministic ROM Simulations 800 600 Upper, Hessenberg 400 200 0 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 800 600 Cayley 400 200 0 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 600 500 400 Exponential 300 200 100 0 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 Figure: Histograms for the 5th marginal density of a ROM simulation involving deterministic L-matrices (m = 15, n = 10, k = 2). Over 10,000 observations are used for each simulation. Marginals are compared to scaled normal distributions. Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 11 / 20

ROM Simulation Properties ROM Simulation Densities: Sign Matrix Effects 1200 Effect of Sign Matrices 1000 Positive Skewness 800 600 400 200 0 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 1200 1000 800 Negative Skewness 600 400 200 0 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 Figure: Histograms for the 5th marginal distribution of two ROM simulations involving deterministic L-matrices (m = 15, n = 10, k = 0) and Cayley matrices. In the lower figure sign matrices are used to induce negative skew. Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 12 / 20

Outline Applications in Finance ROM Simulation ROM Simulation Properties Applications in Finance Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 13 / 20

Applications in Finance Portfolio Value-at-Risk (VaR) The level VaR(α,h) represents the h-day portfolio loss that we assume is exceeded with probability α If portfolio h-day returns are normally distributed then VaR(α,h) = Φ 1 (α)σ h µ h Portfolio losses are typically non-normal (leptokurtic) Common to simulate losses (returns) and calculate empirical quantiles VaR(α,h) = q α (r h m) where r h m is a vector containing m scenarios for portfolio h-day returns Historical simulation is particularly popular Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 14 / 20

Applications in Finance An MSCI Country Index Portfolio We consider a portfolio whose assets individually track the n = 45 country indices in the MSCI All Country World Index Portfolio return r π is weighted average of asset returns x = (x 1,...,x n ) r π = π(x) = n w i x i where n w i = 1 i=1 i=1 Correlations between the assets returns are key Multivariate kurtosis is also important Let X mn denote m (simulated) scenarios on the n assets, then X mn π r m where r m is a vector of portfolio scenarios Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 15 / 20

Applications in Finance Scenario Generation Techniques for VaR Two year historical window target moments µ n, S n, κ M We generate scenarios X mn using six different techniques: (1) - (3) ROM Simulations Type I L-matrices used to target κ M Three types of random orthogonal matrices (4) Multivariate Normal (Monte Carlo and analytic) (5) Multivariate Student-t (Monte Carlo, ν = 6 degrees of freedom) (6) Historical simulation (two years of observations) Note: Limited data are available for historical quantile estimation Estimate portfolio VaR roll window forward and repeat Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 16 / 20

Applications in Finance Daily VaR for Equally Weighted Portfolio 0.08 MSCI Portfolio : 1% Daily VaR 0.07 0.06 0.05 Hessenberg Cayley Exponential Normal (MC) Student-t (MC) Historical Normal (Analytic) 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Figure: Evolution of daily VaR, given as a percentage of the portfolio value Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 17 / 20

Daily VaR Exceedances Applications in Finance 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Figure: Equally weighted daily portfolio returns, plotted with negative VaR Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 18 / 20

Applications in Finance Proportion of Exceedances for Equally Weighted Portfolio Exceedances Coverage Tests m 1 m 1 /m Uncond. Cond. Hessenberg 24 0.89% 0.36 6.03% Cayley 32 1.18% 0.86 4.45% Exponential 56 2.07% 23.89 47.49% Normal (MC) 73 2.70% 53.80 84.48% Student-t (MC) 41 1.52% 6.27 24.23% Historical 37 1.37% 3.31 18.39% Normal (Analytic) 74 2.73% 55.84 85.82% Table: m is the total number of out-of-sample returns (2647 daily). The 1% critical values are 6.63 for the Unconditional test and 9.21 for the Conditional test Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 19 / 20

Applications in Finance Summary Exact mean-covariance samples are generated from L-matrices Orthogonal matrices can be used to randomise these samples Different simulation properties associated with different types of orthogonal matrix Target higher order moments with deterministic L-matrices ROM simulation is a useful scenario generation technique Portfolio Value-at-Risk Portfolio allocation optimisations Alexander and Ledermann (ICMA Centre) 23rd June 2010 20 / 20