City of Flagstaff. Retail Market Analysis

Similar documents
Village of Manchester Retail Market Analysis

Economic Impact of the Proposed General Plan Update

CAMBRIDGE TRADE AREA DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND RETAIL SALES POTENTIAL

For Sale ± 1.25 Acres 2 Bay Chevron Service Station East John Ralston Road, Houston, TX 77029

RETAIL FAST FACTS. Monthly Growth Rate Montréal, Quebec Quebec Alberta Nova Scotia Ontario

The Economic Impact of the. and the Georgia Dome

Charlotte County SOUTHWEST FLORIDA Economic Development Office

The Economic Impact Of Travel on Massachusetts Counties 2015

Sales and Use Tax Collection Report April 2013 Issued May 10, 2013

APPLICATIONS OF ECONOMIC DATA

The Economic Capture of the Downtown Phoenix Redevelopment Area. Prepared for:

FOR SALE. For More Information:

Sales and Use Tax Collection Report December 2018 Issued January 10, 2019

SHAREHOLDERS APPROVE REALTY INCOME S ACQUISITION OF AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL TRUST

TAUSSIG DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY CITY OF ESCALON. Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban Economics Clean Energy Bonds

California Parks and Recreation Society Magazine

San Francisco s Formula Retail Economic Analysis

2002 State Economic Impacts of Missouri State Park Visitors. Project Completion Report

Randall Gross / Development Economics. with The Walker Collaborative and the Memphis Area Association of Governments

Georgia World Congress Center and Georgia Dome Economic Impact Analysis FY 2012

2016 Economic Impact of Tourism in Morgan County. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

March Campaign ROI

The Economic Impact of Travel on Massachusetts Counties 2016

Georgia World Congress Center and Georgia Dome Economic Impact Analysis FY 2017

2016 Economic Impact of Tourism in Tippecanoe County. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

Georgia World Congress Center and Georgia Dome Economic Impact Analysis FY 2016

Financial Disclosure Statement of Plaintiff Defendant

ECONOMIC AND REVENUE IMPACTS

and Financial Disclosure Statement of:

Lake Havasu City Travel Impacts, p

Erratum. Jeffrey R. Campbell Hugo A. Hopenhayn. June, 2006

an economic impact and future growth study of New Brunswick s high-value insurance sector

Rebekka Dudensing, Texas AgriLife Extension Service I January Economic Impact of the Brazos

Volume Title: Corporate Profits as Shown by Audit Reports. Volume URL:

Scottsdale Tourism Study - Visitor Statistics

The Struggle for Tax Reform in Maine: Richard Woodbury Presentation to Vermont Tax Reform Commission January 2010

ECONOMIC ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES PAPER

DRAFT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED RINCON DEL RIO SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT IN NEVADA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MAY 28, 2009

Measuring the Economic Returns from Festivals and Special Events

Bureau of Statistics and Plans Business and Economic Statistics Program Government of Guam

Retail Market Demand and Impact Analysis City of Elliot Lake, Ontario

Wholesale trade Retail trade. 10 Value of goods in stock. Annual sales of goods

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TOURISM IN VERMONT: SPRING & SUMMER 2001

2. Analyze your spending. See how much you spend in each category. Notice any trends and look for expenses you can eliminate or cut back on.

Arizona Travel Impacts p

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction to the Economic Development Element 1

Budgeting Your Money

SUZEORMAN.COM. Exercise: My Monthly Expenses. Instructions:

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Fort Collins, CO

# 17 ASSETS: Severance Pay, RRSP and RIF 8-2 # 18 NET WORTH CALCULATION 8-4 # 19 MONTHLY RETIREMENT INCOME 8-6 # 20 MONTHLY RETIREMENT EXPENSES 8-7

ORDINANCE NO

Egypt. A: Identification. B: CPI Coverage. Title of the CPI: Consumer Price Index

Scottsdale Tourism Study - Visitor Statistics

Transient Room Tax. Presentation prepared by Marian DeLay Travel Council Executive Director

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY. Case No. Name. Birthdate Age Birthdate Age Employer. Employer

Economic contribution of REITs in the United States

4.0 Retail Market: Demand Analysis

Economic Impact of THE PLAYERS Championship Golf Tournament at Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida, May Tom Stevens, Alan Hodges and David Mulkey

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Fort Collins, CO

2014 BREVARD COUNTY LIVING WAGE STUDY Living Wage Study 1 P age

Economic and Fiscal Impact of the Arizona Public University Enterprise

4101 Yellowstone Avenue Chubbuck, ID Pocatello-Chubbuck MSA

The Economic Impact of Travel on Massachusetts Counties 2009

RESEARCH BRIEF. No. 3 April The Economic Contributions of Tourism in Utah A Regional Comparison

This training guide will demonstrate the Client Site Budgeting Tool.

Monthly Financial Report. Citywide Revenue, $26.1 million (7.9% of the total annual budget

Q Financial Results Conference Call Slides

Household Expenditure Guide

Consumer Expenditures in 2000

SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST GUIDELINES

Gateway Center, Collinsville, Illinois Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA ATHLETICS DEPARTMENT, FISCAL YEAR

Q Financial Results Conference Call Slides

Messages and Communications

DETROIT S WORKFORCE ANALYSIS

Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) Community Information Session Honourable Wesley J. Sheridan Minister

3.4 For the purposes of the Promotion, the following terms are defined as follows:-

AN ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY OF A CONVENTION CENTER IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

Retail Trade Analysis Report Fiscal Year 2017

SKECHERS HERMOSA BEACH DESIGN CENTER & EXECUTIVE OFFICES

Western SoMa Land Use Matrix (Proposed by the WSoMa Task Force on 7/15/2010)

The Economic Impact of Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Gaming Operations

Consumer Price Index

EXERCISES E14 1. E14 2.

Management s discussion and analysis (MD&A)

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TRAVEL ON GEORGIA 2004 PROFILE

Income and Expense Statement Advanced Level

Rates Effective 1/1/2018 Water Residential and Commercial Charges CPI not applicable to base and consumption rates for Rates Effective 1/1/2017

Arizona Travel Impacts p

Indianapolis Airport Authority Overview of the ACDBE Program Update Federal Fiscal Years (FFY)

A free publication provided by. Consolidated Credit Counseling Services, Inc.TM

Nominal price of a burger in 1955 is $0.15. Nominal price of a burger in 2002 is $0.79.

U.S. INTERN RELOCATION GUIDE

USE THIS GUIDE AND LEARN HOW TO

Schedule B - Automobile Dealers, Farm Implement & Equipment Dealers, Mobile Homes

BULLETIN OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP TO: March 31, Northwest Regional Office. Businessowners Protector Program Changes

ECONOMIC AND REVENUE IMPACTS

APPLICATION FOR DEALERS LICENSE

AN ORDINANCE. SECTION 1. Title 14 of The Philadelphia Code is hereby amended to read as follows: TITLE 14. ZONING AND PLANNING * * *

Georgia World Congress Center Authority Economic Impact Analysis FY 2018

Transcription:

City of Flagstaff Retail Market Analysis Prepared by Tom Pippin and Scott Kitchens, BBC Research & Consulting Sponsored by City of Flagstaff and Flagstaff Chamber of Commerce

Table of Contents Research goals Methodology Step 1 Define Trade Area Step 2 Calculate Spending Power Step 3 Calculate Leakage Step 4 New Stores Needed Flagstaff Visitors Conclusions 2

Research Goals Determine what we would expect households located within the Flagstaff Retail Trade Area (FRTA) to spend each year on retail goods. Compare those expected sales with actual retail records provided by the City. Determine which retail categories earn more or less than the amount that we expect. For those retail categories that earn less than we expect, calculate the number of new stores that could be supported by households in the FRTA. 3

Methodology Using household counts provided by the City and detailed household expenditure estimates provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey (CES), we calculated the total annual retail purchases in 14 major retail categories that we expect to be made by households in the FRTA. The CES aggregates the daily spending records of thousands of U.S. households in great categorical detail. It is a highly respected source of What are U.S. households buying? data. We compared these expected categorical retail sales with actual retail sales records provided by the City. Those categories in which the City earned more than we expected were classified as importers while those that earned less than we expected we classified as leakers. 4

Methodology (cont.) For those retail categories that were leakers, we then used the dollar amount of leakage in each category to impute the number of new stores that are needed to accommodate those leaked retail sales. Using average store sizes and sales per square foot from the Urban Land Institute s Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers 2006, we determined the average sales of each store type and calculated the number of new stores that could be supported by unmet consumer demand in the FRTA. Dollars and Cents is a compendium of statistics for retail establishments found in shopping centers around the United States. Average store size, average sales per square foot, and other useful metrics are compiled for hundreds of types of retail establishments, such as grocery stores, footwear, movie theatres, etc. It is a very well-respected source for such data. 5

Retail Leakage -- Definition Retail Leakage is basically defined as local households using the Internet or driving elsewhere, to conduct their shopping. Instead of buying a retail good locally, they use Internet retailers or drive to another location to purchase said retail good. This could be due to a lack of local availability of the good they wish to buy, a better quality good found elsewhere or other similar reasons. The exact opposite households driving from another location to purchase goods locally is referred to as retail importation. We can estimate what categories of retail goods are leaked and imported using the methodology described on the prior slides. 6

Step 1 Define Retail Trade Area Flagstaff is the regional retail hub of Northern Arizona. A large number of visitors pass through and lodge in the City en route to Grand Canyon National Park. The Flagstaff Retail Trade Area (FRTA) extends well north of the City to the Utah border. Number of Households in FRTA, 2006-2008 2006 Source: City of Flagstaff Trade Area Analysis, 2008. 2007 2008 Households 65,414 66,378 67,342 7

Step 1 Map of Retail Trade Area 8

Step 2 Spending Power Using the 2007 Urban Consumer Expenditure Survey, we were able to calculate the average annual household expenditures in 14 retail categories for the Western U.S. We then multiplied each of those annual expenditures by the number of households in the FRTA to calculate the total expected annual sales for each category based on the number of households in the FRTA. These expected retail sales per category would then later be compared to actual retail sales records provided by the City to determine which categories import sales and which categories export sales. 9

Step 2 Spending Power 2006 2006 Average Annual Expenditures per Household (1) Number of Households in Trade Area "Expected" Annual Sales per Retail Category Clothing $ 835.52 X 65,414 = $ 54,654,498 Shoes $ 206.38 X 65,414 = $ 13,500,443 Furniture/House Furnishings $ 813.90 X 65,414 = $ 53,240,261 Appliances $ 363.76 X 65,414 = $ 23,794,744 Toys/Gifts $ 91.55 X 65,414 = $ 5,988,710 Bookstores $ 82.53 X 65,414 = $ 5,398,480 Pets $ 291.61 X 65,414 = $ 19,075,606 Jewelry $ 80.43 X 65,414 = $ 5,261,145 Building Materials/Lumber $ 71.18 X 65,414 = $ 4,656,256 Restaurants $ 1,762.34 X 65,414 = $ 115,281,503 Grocery Stores/Bakeries (2) $ 3,383.72 X 65,414 = $ 221,342,693 Auto Parts $ 190.59 X 65,414 = $ 12,467,348 Auto Dealerships $ 2,139.61 X 65,414 = $ 139,960,434 Sports and Recreational Equipment $ 91.95 X 65,414 = $ 6,014,556 TOTALS $ 680,636,678 (1) Based on 2007 CES, inflated/deflated to appropriate year based on Urban Consumer Price Index. (2) Includes sales of liquor and pharmaceutical drugs. 10

Step 2 Spending Power 2007 2007 Average Annual Expenditures per Household (1) Number of Households in Trade Area "Expected" Annual Sales per Retail Category Clothing $ 869.77 X 66,378 = $ 57,733,794 Shoes $ 214.85 X 66,378 = $ 14,261,073 Furniture/House Furnishings $ 847.27 X 66,378 = $ 56,239,877 Appliances $ 378.67 X 66,378 = $ 25,135,366 Toys/Gifts $ 95.30 X 66,378 = $ 6,326,120 Bookstores $ 85.91 X 66,378 = $ 5,702,636 Pets $ 303.57 X 66,378 = $ 20,150,347 Jewelry $ 83.73 X 66,378 = $ 5,557,564 Building Materials/Lumber $ 74.10 X 66,378 = $ 4,918,595 Restaurants $ 1,834.59 X 66,378 = $ 121,776,592 Grocery Stores/Bakeries (2) $ 3,522.45 X 66,378 = $ 233,813,388 Auto Parts $ 198.41 X 66,378 = $ 13,169,773 Auto Dealerships $ 2,227.33 X 66,378 = $ 147,845,961 Sports and Recreational Equipment $ 95.72 X 66,378 = $ 6,353,423 TOTALS $ 718,984,511 (1) Based on 2007 CES, inflated/deflated to appropriate year based on Urban Consumer Price Index. (2) Includes sales of liquor and pharmaceutical drugs. 11

Step 2 Spending Power 2008 2008 Average Annual Expenditures per Household (1) Number of Households in Trade Area "Expected" Annual Sales per Retail Category Clothing $ 870.64 X 67,342 = $ 58,630,827 Shoes $ 215.06 X 67,342 = $ 14,482,654 Furniture/House Furnishings $ 848.11 X 67,342 = $ 57,113,699 Appliances $ 379.05 X 67,342 = $ 25,525,904 Toys/Gifts $ 95.40 X 67,342 = $ 6,424,412 Bookstores $ 86.00 X 67,342 = $ 5,791,241 Pets $ 303.87 X 67,342 = $ 20,463,432 Jewelry $ 83.81 X 67,342 = $ 5,643,914 Building Materials/Lumber $ 74.17 X 67,342 = $ 4,995,017 Restaurants $ 1,836.43 X 67,342 = $ 123,668,685 Grocery Stores/Bakeries (2) $ 3,525.98 X 67,342 = $ 237,446,241 Auto Parts $ 198.60 X 67,342 = $ 13,374,397 Auto Dealerships $ 2,229.56 X 67,342 = $ 150,143,104 Sports and Recreational Equipment $ 95.81 X 67,342 = $ 6,452,139 TOTALS $ 730,155,666 (1) Based on 2007 CES, inflated/deflated to appropriate year based on Urban Consumer Price Index. (2) Includes sales of liquor and pharmaceutical drugs. 12

Step 3 Actual Retail Sales After calculating the expected retail sales in Flagstaff, we then examined the actual retail sales in the City. The following data was provided by the City s Tax Administrator and is based on sales tax records. 13

Step 3 Actual Retail Sales Retail Category 2006 2007 2008 Clothing $ 33,767,900 $ 34,411,300 $ 29,089,700 Shoes $ 6,052,700 $ 6,631,500 $ 6,981,100 Furniture/House Furnishings $ 28,096,000 $ 27,130,200 $ 28,952,800 Appliances $ 14,631,700 $ 17,983,100 $ 28,688,300 Toys/Gifts $ 17,869,600 $ 17,465,200 $ 18,322,500 Bookstores $ 14,988,200 $ 23,594,800 $ 22,736,200 Pets $ 11,824,200 $ 12,682,400 $ 13,282,300 Jewelry $ 8,088,800 $ 6,628,800 $ 5,715,700 Building Materials/Lumber $ 175,695,300 $ 150,172,600 $ 129,884,400 Restaurants $ 189,321,900 $ 189,526,800 $ 187,054,900 Grocery Stores/Bakeries (1) $ 395,094,300 $ 415,412,500 $ 433,260,700 Auto Parts $ 74,551,100 $ 75,849,200 $ 65,081,300 Auto Dealerships $ 199,564,000 $ 194,208,100 $ 144,778,200 Sports and Recreational Equipment $ 23,784,800 $ 24,615,800 $ 24,025,700 TOTALS $ 1,193,330,500 $ 1,196,312,300 $ 1,137,853,800 (1) Includes sales of liquor and pharmaceutical drugs. Data provided by City of Flagstaff. 14

Step 3 Actual Retail Sales Flagstaff s retail establishments in the 14 categories annually sold between approximately $1.14 billion and $1.20 billion of retail goods in 2006 through 2008. The Grocery Stores/Bakeries retail category sold the largest amount in each year, averaging close to $415 million in annual retail sales over the 3-year period. These retail purchases were made by residents living in the FRTA as well as visitors and other outof-area residents. 15

Step 3 Leakage Analysis - 2006 Here we compare our expected sales with the City s actual sales. 2006 "Expected" Annual Sales per Retail Category "Actual" Annual Sales per Retail Category Importation / (Leakage) Clothing $ 54,654,498 $ 33,767,900 $ (20,886,598) Shoes $ 13,500,443 $ 6,052,700 $ (7,447,743) Furniture/House Furnishings $ 53,240,261 $ 28,096,000 $ (25,144,261) Appliances $ 23,794,744 $ 14,631,700 $ (9,163,044) Toys/Gifts $ 5,988,710 $ 17,869,600 $ 11,880,890 Bookstores $ 5,398,480 $ 14,988,200 $ 9,589,720 Pets $ 19,075,606 $ 11,824,200 $ (7,251,406) Jewelry $ 5,261,145 $ 8,088,800 $ 2,827,655 Building Materials/Lumber $ 4,656,256 $ 175,695,300 $ 171,039,044 Restaurants $ 115,281,503 $ 189,321,900 $ 74,040,397 Grocery Stores/Bakeries (2) $ 221,342,693 $ 395,094,300 $ 173,751,607 Auto Parts $ 12,467,348 $ 74,551,100 $ 62,083,752 Auto Dealerships $ 139,960,434 $ 199,564,000 $ 59,603,566 Sports and Recreational Equipment $ 6,014,556 $ 23,784,800 $ 17,770,244 TOTALS $ 680,636,678 $ 1,193,330,500 $ 512,693,822 Flagstaff leaked in the retail categories of Clothing, Shoes, Furniture, Appliances, and Pets in 2006. 16

Step 3 Leakage Analysis - 2007 Here we compare our expected sales with the City s actual sales. 2007 "Expected" Annual Sales per Retail Category "Actual" Annual Sales per Retail Category Importation / (Leakage) Clothing $ 57,733,794 $ 34,411,300 $ (23,322,494) Shoes $ 14,261,073 $ 6,631,500 $ (7,629,573) Furniture/House Furnishings $ 56,239,877 $ 27,130,200 $ (29,109,677) Appliances $ 25,135,366 $ 17,983,100 $ (7,152,266) Toys/Gifts $ 6,326,120 $ 17,465,200 $ 11,139,080 Bookstores $ 5,702,636 $ 23,594,800 $ 17,892,164 Pets $ 20,150,347 $ 12,682,400 $ (7,467,947) Jewelry $ 5,557,564 $ 6,628,800 $ 1,071,236 Building Materials/Lumber $ 4,918,595 $ 150,172,600 $ 145,254,005 Restaurants $ 121,776,592 $ 189,526,800 $ 67,750,208 Grocery Stores/Bakeries (2) $ 233,813,388 $ 415,412,500 $ 181,599,112 Auto Parts $ 13,169,773 $ 75,849,200 $ 62,679,427 Auto Dealerships $ 147,845,961 $ 194,208,100 $ 46,362,139 Sports and Recreational Equipment $ 6,353,423 $ 24,615,800 $ 18,262,377 TOTALS $ 718,984,511 $ 1,196,312,300 $ 477,327,789 Flagstaff leaked in the retail categories of Clothing, Shoes, Furniture, Appliances, and Pets in 2007. 17

Step 3 Leakage Analysis - 2008 Here we compare our expected sales with the City s actual sales. 2008 "Expected" Annual Sales per Retail Category "Actual" Annual Sales per Retail Category Importation / (Leakage) Clothing $ 58,630,827 $ 29,089,700 $ (29,541,127) Shoes $ 14,482,654 $ 6,981,100 $ (7,501,554) Furniture/House Furnishings $ 57,113,699 $ 28,952,800 $ (28,160,899) Appliances $ 25,525,904 $ 28,688,300 $ 3,162,396 Toys/Gifts $ 6,424,412 $ 18,322,500 $ 11,898,088 Bookstores $ 5,791,241 $ 22,736,200 $ 16,944,959 Pets $ 20,463,432 $ 13,282,300 $ (7,181,132) Jewelry $ 5,643,914 $ 5,715,700 $ 71,786 Building Materials/Lumber $ 4,995,017 $ 129,884,400 $ 124,889,383 Restaurants $ 123,668,685 $ 187,054,900 $ 63,386,215 Grocery Stores/Bakeries (2) $ 237,446,241 $ 433,260,700 $ 195,814,459 Auto Parts $ 13,374,397 $ 65,081,300 $ 51,706,903 Auto Dealerships $ 150,143,104 $ 144,778,200 $ (5,364,904) Sports and Recreational Equipment $ 6,452,139 $ 24,025,700 $ 17,573,561 TOTALS $ 730,155,666 $ 1,137,853,800 $ 407,698,134 Flagstaff leaked in the retail categories of Clothing, Shoes, Furniture, Pets and Auto Dealerships in 2008. 18

Step 3 Leakage Analysis Overall, Flagstaff is an importer. This makes sense the large number of visitors to the Grand Canyon purchase goods in the Flagstaff area and the City generates more retail sales than would be expected based on the number of households in the FRTA. However, Flagstaff leaked sales in the retail categories of Clothing, Shoes, Furniture, and Pets in 2006-2008, in the retail category of Appliances in 2006 and 2007 and in the retail category of auto dealerships in 2008. This indicates that retail purchases in each of those categories that should be made in Flagstaff are in fact being made elsewhere. Based on this leakage, we were able to calculate the number of stores warranted by that unmet consumer demand. 19

Step 4 New Stores Needed Using the Urban Land Institute s Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers 2006, we obtained the average size (sq. ft.) and sales per square foot for stores in each of the leaking retail categories. Retail Category Square Feet per Store (1) Median Annual Retail Sales per Square Foot (2) Average Annual Total Retail Sales per Store Clothing 27,079 X $ 322.38 = $ 8,729,728 Shoes 25,314 X $ 149.36 = $ 3,780,899 Furniture/House Furnishings 51,040 X $ 227.64 = $ 11,618,746 Applicances (3) 52,207 X $ 230.00 = $ 12,007,610 Pets 26,471 X $ 190.10 = $ 5,032,137 New and Used Automobiles (4) n/a X n/a = $ 31,855,768 1) Represents median or upper-decile value for each category. 2) Median sales per square foot for 2006. We have inflated these estimates based for 2007 and 2008 based on Urban Consumer Price Index. 3) Professional estimates based on our prior experience with retail shopping centers. 4) Sales per dealership from National Auto Dealership Association. 20

Step 4 New Stores Needed We then divided the total leakage for each retail category by the average annual total sales per store to calculate the number of new stores needed to accommodate unmet consumer demand in the FRTA. Retail Category 2006 2007 Retail Sales Stores Retail Sales Leakage Warranted Leakage Stores Warranted 2008 Retail Sales Leakage Stores Warrante Average Number of Stores Warranted Clothing $ (20,886,598) 2.4 $ (23,322,494) 0.7 $ (29,541,127) 0.8 1.3 Shoes $ (7,447,743) 2.0 $ (7,629,573) 1.9 $ (7,501,554) 1.9 1.9 Furniture/House Furnishings $ (25,144,261) 2.2 $ (29,109,677) 2.4 $ (28,160,899) 2.3 2.3 Applicances $ (9,163,044) 0.8 $ (7,152,266) 0.6 $ - N/A 0.7 Pets $ (7,251,406) 1.4 $ (7,467,947) 1.4 $ (7,181,132) 1.4 1.4 Auto Dealerships $ - N/A $ - N/A $ (5,364,904) 0.2 0.2 The far right column displays the average number of new stores needed in Flagstaff based on the past three years of retail sales. For example, Flagstaff needs 1.4 new Pets stores to fully accommodate local consumer demand for goods sold at such stores. 21

Auto Dealerships We believe the results of our analysis for Flagstaff auto dealerships overestimate the amount of importation such stores generate. Flagstaff auto dealers report a sales ratio of 40% cars/60% trucks, whereas nationally, stores report a sales ratio of 60% cars/40% trucks. Trucks are generally $10,000 to $15,000 more expensive than cars. As Flagstaff auto dealerships sell more trucks at a higher cost than the national average, their actual sales will be artificially inflated when compared to our expected sales. Based on this data and personal discussions with Flagstaff auto dealers, we believe Flagstaff actually leaks automobile sales to surrounding communities and could benefit from additional auto dealerships in the City. 22

Flagstaff Visitors Millions of visitors from around the United States (as well as the world) annually shop and lodge in Flagstaff while visiting the Grand Canyon National Park and other area attractions. Our prior analysis only considered retail spending by full-time residents of the FRTA. What impact would visitors have on our leakage analysis? Using annual visitor estimates and average lengths of stay provided by the City, we estimated that the approximately 3.0 million annual Flagstaff visitors are equivalent to an additional 8,700 full-time resident households. We then applied the same methodology used in our prior analysis, only for visitors we removed retail categories in which visitors are less likely to shop, such as Furniture/Home Furnishings, Appliances and Pets. 23

Flagstaff Visitors New Stores Needed Inclusion of visitors in our analysis resulted in additional leakage in the retail categories of Clothing and Shoes. The remaining three retail categories were not affected as we did not expect visitors to shop at such stores. Retail Category 2006 2007 Retail Sales Stores Retail Sales Leakage Warranted Leakage Stores Warranted 2008 Retail Sales Leakage Stores Warrante Average Number of Stores Warranted Clothing $ (28,179,284) 3.2 $ (30,914,742) 0.9 $ (37,140,968) 1.1 1.7 Shoes $ (9,249,275) 2.4 $ (9,504,968) 2.4 $ (9,378,823) 2.4 2.4 Furniture/House Furnishings $ (25,144,261) 2.2 $ (29,109,677) 2.4 $ (28,160,899) 2.3 2.3 Applicances $ (9,163,044) 0.8 $ (7,152,266) 0.6 $ - N/A 0.7 Pets $ (7,251,406) 1.4 $ (7,467,947) 1.4 $ (7,181,132) 1.4 1.4 Auto Dealerships $ - N/A $ - N/A $ (5,364,904) 0.2 0.2 Construction of the calculated number of additional stores in each retail category would satisfy unmet consumer demand by existing residents in the FRTA as well as Flagstaff visitors. 24

Conclusions Based on the preceding analysis, we have concluded that unmet consumer demand warrants the construction of the following new retail establishments within the City. Without Visitors With Visitors Retail Category Average Number of Stores Warranted Retail Category Average Number of Stores Warranted Clothing 1.3 Clothing 1.7 Shoes 1.9 Shoes 2.4 Furniture/House Furnishings 2.3 Furniture/House Furnishings 2.3 Applicances 0.7 Applicances 0.7 Pets 1.4 Pets 1.4 Auto Dealerships 0.2 Auto Dealerships 0.2 Existing residents of the FRTA and visitors who shop for these goods elsewhere could likely begin purchasing such goods in Flagstaff if these new stores are constructed. 25

Conclusions What types of merchandise would these new retailers need to carry? The following pie chart show a potential product distribution for clothing stores based on typical household spending patterns. 23% Men's Clothing 29% Women's Clothing Children's Clothing 48% 26