Background of the Anti-Money Laundering Directive

Similar documents
The fifth anti-money laundering and terrorist financing directive (AML 5) - Key aspects and changes

European Parliament and Council Formally Approve Fifth Update to AML Directive

Current developments related to AML legislation in the in the EU Dr. Katharina Lasota Heller HütteLaw

The Fifth Money Laundering Directive (MLD5) Its meaning and significance. Monica Fahmy

4th Anti-Money Laundering Directive and 2d Fund Transfers Regulation- General overview and impact on payments

WIND OF CHANGE: Risk Assessment. Anti-Money Laundering, Countering Terrorism Financing, Application of International Sanctions

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council

FINANCIAL SERVICES. Transposition of the Fourth AntiMoney Laundering Directive. by Damien Barnaville

How to improve transparency of corporate ownership structures and beneficial ownership in the AML/CFT framework?

To whom it may concern. Implementation of the 4th EU Anti Money Laundering Directive

THE THIRD EU DIRECTIVE ON MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORIST FINANCING

STATEMENT OF ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) AND COMBATING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM (CFT) POLICIES AND PRINCIPLES

JC /05/2017. Final Report

MONEY LAUNDERING - The EU and Malta

Delegations will find below a Presidency compromise text on the abovementioned proposal.

MLD 5: the MLD 4 upgrade

Supranational risk assessment on money laundering and terrorist financing (SNRA) DG Justice and Consumers B3 Financial crime Kallina SIMEONOFF

The new anti-money laundering directives Summarizing the changes and providing an update

FINAL DRAFT RTS UNDER ARTICLE 45(6) OF DIRECTIVE (EU) 2015/849 JC /12/2017. Final Report

INCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. A. Context, Subsidiarity Check and Objectives

Strict implementation of laws, improving vigilance and enhancing due diligence

5782/16 ADD 1 SS,PK/mmf DGG 1B

Eurofinas is entered into the European Transparency Register of Interest Representatives with ID n

ARMENIA. Mutual Evaluation Report - Addendum. Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism

Redline (4AMLD 5AMLD)

AML & KYC QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Preparing for becoming a reporting entity under the AML/CFT Act

DIRECTIVES. (Text with EEA relevance) Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,

Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Guidelines for the Financial Sector

Delegations will find below a Presidency compromise text on the abovementioned proposal.

CYPRUS BAR ASSOCIATION

PRESS KIT. The key steps in countering the financing of terrorism at domestic, European and international level since 2015

Revision of the Fourth Anti-Money- Laundering Directive

Delegations will find below a Presidency compromise text on the abovementioned proposal.

The Romanian Government adopts this decision.

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Policy on Anti Money Laundering and Countering Terrorist Financing

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 13 May 2011 (OR. en) 2009/0064 (COD) PE-CONS 60/10 EF 181 ECOFIN 738 CODEC 1293

Fourth and Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directives: implementing AML updates and UBO registers in Cyprus

PE-CONS 72/17 DGG 1B EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 26 April 2018 (OR. en) 2016/0208 (COD) PE-CONS 72/17

Austria. Follow-up report. Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

New payment instruments, avatars of fiduciary money: New risk factors for AML/CFT

Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) (Amendment) Act 2018

FATF MUTUAL EVALUATION OF CANADA S ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING MEASURES

FRANCE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP TRANSPARENCY

SWITZERLAND BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP TRANSPARENCY

Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Financing of Terrorism Framework 17 January 2018

Official Journal of the European Union L 214/29

ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING POLICY. (2 nd Edition)

Updates on Disclosure on Beneficial Ownership

THE GAZETTE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

Public Conference The fight against Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Brussels, 15 March 2013

CONTINENTAL REINSURANCE ( C Re ) ANTI-MONEY LAUDERING/COUNTERING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM (AML/CFT) POLICY

Subject: Written comments consultation on the Draft Law for the implementation of the Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive

ANTI -MONEYLAUNDERING

Money Laundering in the Trinidad & Tobago Securities Sector

High-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions

13885/16 HG/NT/vm DGG 2B

Statutory Review of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act

BRAZIL BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP TRANSPARENCY

ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING STATEMENT

European Investment Bank. EIB Policy towards weakly regulated, non-transparent and uncooperative jurisdictions

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

TEXTS ADOPTED Provisional edition

Standard 2.4. Customer due diligence - Prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing. Regulations and guidelines

Anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism the Reserve Bank s responsibilities and approach

Improving Global AML/CFT Compliance: On-going Process - 24 February 2017

DEVELOPMENT BANK OF IRAN (EDBI)

Chapter 2: Duties of Financial Intermediaries Section 1: Duty of Due Diligence

Lexperanto association October 2016 TRANSPARENCY ID. Explanatory note

CONSULTATION PAPER NO JUNE 2016 PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING, COUNTER- TERRORIST FINANCING AND SANCTIONS MODULE

Dear Chairman, dear Members of the TAX3 Special Committee,

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

AML/CTF and Sanctions Policy

BANCO NACIONAL ULTRAMARINO, S.A. Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism Disclosure Statement

Keeping ahead of financial crime

Slovenia. Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures. F o l l o w - u p r e p o r t

DUE DILLIGENCE QUESTIONNAIRE Anti-Money Laundering & Anti-Terrorist Financing

In developing this product AML Accelerate draws on unique and unparalleled knowledge and experience contained within the joint venture partners.

POLICIES FOR PROPER IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FOURTH ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING DIRECTIVE

Horizon scanner Financial Crime and Cyber-security RISK RATING. Potential impact

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

SPONSY AML/KYC Policy

SWEDEN. Mutual Evaluation Fourth Follow-Up Report - annexes. Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism

Eva Rossidou Papakyriacou Senior Counsel of the Republic Head of the Unit for Combating Money Laundering (MOKAS)

MONEY-LAUNDERING AND TERRORISM FINANCING PREVENTION SANTANDER GROUP GLOBAL POLICY

Anti-Money Laundering, counter Terrorist Financing and sanctions Procedure

(Information) EUROPEAN COMMISSION. MONETARY AGREEMENT between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra (2011/C 369/01)

CAIXA GERAL DE DEPÓSITOS, SA

Regulation of ICOs in Ireland: An Overview of the Legal, Tax and Regulatory Position

FATF Report to the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors

Translation of Liechtenstein Law

THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA LAW ON COMBATING MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORISM FINANCING CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Comments to the report from the Commission on the application of Directive 2005/60/EC.

AIFM toolbox. AIFM toolbox - May Updated version

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 10 October 2013 (OR. en) 2011/0307 (COD) PE-CONS 37/13 EF 115 ECOFIN 439 DRS 107 CODEC 1296

Briefing Initial Appraisal of a European Commission Impact Assessment

Written questions to Gibraltar

Transcription:

On 19 June 2018 the 5 th Anti-Money Laundering Directive was published in the Official Journal of the EU (Matthäus Schindele already reported for PayTechLaw on the AML5-Update). It entered into force on 9 July 2018 and has to be implemented by the Member States by 10 January 2020. This article aims to provide you with a summary of the most important points, who is affected and what needs to be done by them. Background of the Anti-Money Laundering Directive On 5 July 2016, the European Commission presented its proposal for a 5 th Anti-Money Laundering Directive. This was intended to already amend the 4 th Anti-Money Laundering Directive, which had to be transposed into This article was published on paytechlaw.com 1

national law by the Member States by 26 June 2017. The reason for these amendments in quick succession was the scandal surrounding the Panama Papers and the financing of terrorist groups involved in the terrorist attacks in Paris and Brussels. In light of this, the 5 th Anti-Money Laundering Directive aims to ensure a significant tightening of the European regulations for the prevention of money laundering and terrorism financing. The European Commission, the European Parliament and the Council agreed on the amendment of the 4 th Anti- Money Laundering Directive (the so-called 5 th Anti-Money Laundering Directive) during their trialogue negotiations on 15 December 2017. The European Parliament adopted the Directive on 19 April 2018 and the Council followed suit on 14 May 2018. The publication in the Official Journal concludes the legislative process at the European level. The Member States are now tasked with implementing the Directive by 10 January 2020. The most important changes In summary, the 5 th Anti-Money Laundering Directive contains the following changes: Increased transparency regarding e-money products by reducing the threshold amounts for which no identity information is required and stricter requirements for customer verification Inclusion of exchange platforms for virtual currencies, providers of electronic wallets, rental brokers, freeports and art dealers in the scope of the Anti-Money Laundering Directive Increased due diligence obligations with regard to high-risk third countries Increasing the powers of financial intelligence units (FIUs), promoting their cooperation and providing FIUs with fast access to information on bank and payment account holders via centralised registers and electronic data retrieval systems Greater transparency regarding beneficial owners Who is affected? The 5 th Anti-Money Laundering Directive applies to credit institutions, payment institutions, e-money institutions, life insurers, investment firms, investment funds, insurance brokers, auditors, external accountants and tax advisors, notaries, lawyers, service providers for trusts or companies, real estate agents, traders, to the extent they make or accept payments of EUR 10,000 or more in cash, as well as gambling services providers. New within the realm of obliged entities are exchange platforms for virtual currencies and providers of electronic wallets for virtual currencies (e.g. Bitcoin), rental brokers, freeports and art dealers, provided the value of the transactions exceeds EUR 10,000 (regardless of whether the payment is made in cash or by bank transfer!). This article was published on paytechlaw.com 2

E-money products or electronic money The 5 th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5AMLD) stipulates strict conditions which have to be met for e-money products to be issued anonymously: The limit for non-rechargeable prepaid products has been reduced from EUR 250 to EUR 150. Anonymous issuances of e-money are now only permitted below this. The current possibility for Member States to raise this threshold to EUR 500 if the e-money could only be used domestically has been abolished. The anonymous issuance of e-money products for the use of remote payment transactions is prohibited if the value of the transaction exceeds EUR 50. This applies e.g. to prepaid credit cards and e-money products. Furthermore, acquirers may only use e-money to process payments if the e-money was issued in a third country with a comparable level of anti-money laundering prevention. As you cannot tell with every payment instrument whether it is e-money or not, this can lead to payment cards from certain countries no longer being accepted in the EU. Member States may also decide to not accept any payments by means of anonymous credit balances on their territory. Virtual currencies The 5 th Anti-Money Laundering Directive also extends the scope of AML/CFT rules exchange platforms for virtual currencies most notably Bitcoin as well as providers of electronic wallets and virtual currency accounts in order to help identify virtual currency users more easily. This is intended to ensure that these platforms and wallet providers are subject to the due diligence obligations towards customers and contribute to combating money laundering and terrorism financing. Virtual currency exchange platforms are mainly electronic exchange offices that convert real currencies into virtual currencies (and vice versa). Wallet providers offer customers accounts or wallets that are denominated in a virtual currency and that can be used to make or receive payments in virtual currencies. Harmonisation of increased due diligence obligations regarding high-risk third countries Under the 4 th Anti-Money Laundering Directive, the persons affected were already obliged to exercise greater due diligence when dealing with natural or legal persons established in high-risk third countries. The EU Commission determines which countries are considered risky by means of a delegate regulation. However, Member States were so far under no obligation to determine the precise nature of the increased due diligence obligations of the obliged persons. This article was published on paytechlaw.com 3

In order to minimise the risk of forum shopping, the 5 th Anti-Money Laundering Directive now provides a binding list of minimum requirements for customers from high-risk third countries: These measures include the obligation to obtain additional information about the customer and the beneficial owner, the envisaged business relationship and the origin of the funds, the reasons for the planned transactions, the approval of the management prior to the business relationship being established and increased monitoring of the business relationship. Member States may also stipulate that the first payment must be made via a customer s account with a bank subject to similar KYC requirements. In addition, in transactions involving high-risk third countries, obliged parties are required to apply further risk mitigation measures, such as increased due diligence or the introduction of relevant reporting mechanisms. Furthermore, additional security measures must be taken when dealing with high-risk third countries, such as a ban on obliged persons setting up subsidiaries in a high-risk third country or the introduction of more stringent external audits. Better access of FIUs to information The access of FIUs to information is facilitated by the introduction of central registers for bank and payment accounts as well as safety deposit boxes. Centralised national registers or electronic data retrieval systems will enable the identification of all national bank accounts of a natural or legal person. This will make information on the identity of bank and payment account holders quickly available to the relevant authorities. It will also enable FIUs to identify persons who own real estate in a timely manner. In parallel, the Commission is examining the possibility of creating a separate legal instrument to allow access to these centralised bank and payment account registers for other purposes (such as criminal investigations and tax authorities). Greater transparency regarding beneficial owners As a consequence of the Panama Papers, the transparency of the actual beneficial owners of certain legal entities is to be improved. The 4 th Anti-Money Laundering Directive already provides a comprehensive framework for the collection, storage and access to information on the beneficial owners of companies, trusts and other types of companies. The 5 th Anti-Money Laundering Directive now specifies what will be registered, where registration has to take place, who will have access to the information (authorities, FIUs, and, to a limited extent, obliged persons and others), and how national registers should be linked with each other. The Directive also specifies what sanctions are imposed in the event of a breach of the reporting obligations. This article was published on paytechlaw.com 4

What do affected companies have to do? The 5 th Anti-Money Laundering Directive means that all companies affected need to further adapt their internal measures to prevent money laundering and terrorism financing. Issuers of electronic money will also have to evaluate their business models as a whole. Bitcoin platforms and corresponding wallet providers also face major challenges as they have to implement the money laundering prevention system. Due to the short timeframe for implementation, it is advisable to consider the new requirements sooner rather than later. About the author and the lawfirm PFR Rechtsanwälte Dr. Bernd Fletzberger is a solicitor and partner at the Vienna business law firm PFR Rechtsanwälte (www.pfr.at). For many years, his main practice areas have been banking, payment services, capital markets and insurance law. He has many years of experience in the area of anti-money laundering compliance. He has been advising financial institutions on compliance with anti-money laundering regulations for years. As a former employee of the FMA and after many years of consultancy activities, he also knows what supervisory authorities pay particular attention to. Titelbild / Cover picture: Copyright fotolia This article was published on paytechlaw.com 5