El Paso County Hospital District

Similar documents
STYLE. Elk Grove Unified School District. Financial Stewardship: Bonds. Prepared by Lori Raineri and Rich Malone April 19, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Douglas County School District, Number RE Tax Exempt General Obligation Refunding Bonds (Refunding of 2004B Bonds)

Decision on Refinancing of 2009 Series A Bonds

September 9, Geneva Community Unit School District 304, Kane County, Illinois. Update on Debt Restructuring Options

MARCH 2017 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

General Obligation Debt Issuance October Budget, Finance & Audit Committee September 27, 2010

NOVEMBER 2017 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

Apr 18, :12 pm Prepared by PFM Financial Advisors LLC (Finance MNAA:SCENARIO-SUNDP3,SUNDP3) Page 1 SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS

JANUARY 2017 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

Blount County, Tennessee

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

Refundings. Presented By: Geoff Stewart. February 25 26, 2019 PFM 1. PFM Financial Advisors LLC pfm.com

OCTOBER 2017 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

Taxable Special Obligation Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2017 CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA

LIFE WITHOUT ADVANCE REFUNDING

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

APRIL 2013 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

Conroe Independent School District

MARCH 2015 REPORT OF THE. and. provides the DCE. Fund. Transportation. or about March. Dulles Tolll Road. Staff and.

RFP # REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR UNDERWRITER SERVICES OR BANK LOAN

NOVEMBER 2014 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

Ohlone Community College District

Alternatives to Advance Refundings

Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Presentation to City of Dallas Finance, Audit and Accountability Committee

Sources & Uses 1. Pricing Summary 2. Debt Service Schedule 3. Derivation Of Form 8038 Yield Statistics 6. Proof of D/S for Arbitrage Purposes 7

A Guide to Investing In Corporate Bonds

CONSOLIDATED UTILITY DISTRICT Rutherford County, Tennessee

Hays Consolidated Independent School District

MESA COUNTY GOVERNMENT Expenditures. Actual Audited Projected Budget

January 25, 2017 Financial Markets & Debt Portfolio Update Contra Costa Transportation Authority Introduction Public Financial Management Inc. (PFM),

Pasadena Public Financing Authority (PPFA)

NARRAGANSETT BAY COMMISSION ONE SERVICE ROAD, PROVIDENCE, RI 02905

LEXINGTON-FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY AIRPORT BOARD REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR TRUSTEE, REGISTRAR AND PAYING AGENT SERVICES

Market-Linked Certificates of Deposit (MLCDs)

Susquehanna Group Advisors, Inc.

State College Area School District Administrative Offices 240 Villa Crest Drive State College, PA

DFW INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS

Best Practices for Debt Management

ACI NA FINANCE SEMINAR CURRENT MUNICIPAL MARKET UPDATE

2016 Strategic Financial Plan Debt Management Policy

Financial Markets & Debt Portfolio Update August 23, 2016 Introduction Public Financial Management Inc., (PFM), financial advisor to the Contra Costa

FEBRUARY 2015 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

U.S. MUNICIPAL NEW ISSUES

SUPPLEMENTAL SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF MULTIPLE SERIES OF. TAX ALLOCATION REFUNDING BONDS AND RELATED BOND DOCUMENTS

MARCH 2016 REPORT OF THE. and. provides the DCE. Fund. Staff is in. Terry. include: Widening

RESOLUTION NO

Debt Management Policy

OCTOBER 2013 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

By: Crystal Betts DATE: April 25, 2016 Chief Financial Officer

BEXAR COUNTY DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

Debt Policy. June 2001

2016 Strategic Financial Plan Debt Management Policy

Plan of Refunding. D) Other Information

INDIANA BOND BANK (A COMPONENT UNIT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA)

Financial Markets & Debt Portfolio Update May 25, 2016 Introduction Public Financial Management Inc., (PFM), financial advisor to the Contra Costa Tra

Washington State University Debt Report to Regents. January 26, 2017

Richardson Independent School District

Attachment A Financial Markets & Debt Portfolio Update October 21, 2016 Introduction Public Financial Management Inc. (PFM), financial advisor to the

Texas Association of County Auditors

PORT OF NEWPORT WORK SESSION AGENDA Tuesday, March 22, 12:00 noon South Beach Activities Room, 2120 SE Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR ###-

Economic Outlook. Presented: April 22, Keith B. Hembre, CFA Chief Economist & Chief Investment Strategist, FAF Advisors.

Source: the City. Unaudited. As of January 1, 2017

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA SERIES 2014 TAN SALE

NOVEMBER 2013 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

B O N D R E P O R T E R NORTH CAROLINA OF STATE TREASURER. ***Dale Folwell CPA, Treasurer *** SCHEDULE OF COMPETITIVE SALES*

MUNICIPAL BONDS IN TEXAS and THE BOND SALE PROCESS

SFPUC Debt Management. Eric Sandler CFO / AGM Business Services November 30, 2016

The Financing Process. RIGFOA Presentation March 18, 2016

Q Earnings Review August 9, 2016

Nevada Rural Hospital Partners Foundation Loan Pool

Determination G22A: Optional Convertible Notes Denominated in New Zealand Dollars

City Council Work Session Handouts - Updated. March 23, Richardson GO Refunding S15 and CO S15A and B Complete Sale Book

School Board of Palm Beach County Finance Committee Meeting November 4, 2016

1. Classification of Debt and Measurement Issues

CHAPTER 5 Bonds and Their Valuation

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS

OAKLAND OVERSIGHT BOARD

DEBT POLICY Policy 520

Recent Debt Summary & Related Issues

ITEM NO. CA3. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON STAFF REPORT PUBLIC MEETING DATE: January 26, 2006

Mount Diablo Unified School District

Debt Private Placements

First Investors California Tax Exempt Fund Ticker Symbols Summary Prospectus May 1, 2018 Class A: FICAX

DEBT SUPPLEMENT REPORT. of the CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA. for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2010

London Property Management Association (LPMA) INTERROGATORY #29 List 1. Issue 18 Is the forecast of long term debt for appropriate?

JOSEPH A. KEOUGH JR.* JEROME V. SWEENEY III* SEAN P. KEOUGH* STACI L. KOLB JEROME V. SWEENEY II OF COUNSEL

Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority (A Component Unit of the State of Connecticut)

1.00% % None None

Hybrid Securities, a New Investment Choice

Policy No.: ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Original Date: May 17, Page: 1 of 10 Owner: Financial and Administrative Services

NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY

Debt Retreat. April 13, 2015

Debt Management Policy

Palm Beach County School District

FEBRUARY 2013 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

Presentation to Tier 1 Investors April 2005

Accrued Interest A currently unpaid amount of interest that has accumulated since the last payment on a bond or other fixed-income security.

The Midpeninsula Regional

Fixed Income Securities: Bonds

Transcription:

Contact: Christopher Janning Managing Director 1201 Elm Street Suite 3500 Dallas, TX 75270 El Paso County Hospital District Phone: 214.953.4042 christopher.janning@hilltopsecurities.com Bond Refinancing Analysis Update March 1, 2017

Table of Contents Summary of Key Assumption Illustrated Results July 2016 Illustrated Results Current Situation Tab A Tab B Tab C

Summary of Key Assumptions Tab A

Key Assumptions The District has outstanding Series 2008A general obligation bonds that are callable at the District s option on or after August 15, 2018 The Series 2008A Bonds bear interest at interest rates ranging from 4.50% to 5.00% Tax law allows issuers of tax-exempt bonds to refinance their bonds in advance of the call date one time ( Advance Refunding ) The District has not yet advance refunded the Series 2008A bonds and is therefore eligible to consider doing so If the District elects to advance refund the Series 2008A bonds, new bonds at lower interest rates will be sold The proceeds from the new bond issue will be used to establish an escrow account to pay the scheduled interest payments on the refinanced 2008A Bonds until the call date and to redeem all of the refinanced principal value of the 2008A Bonds on the call date (and to pay all transaction costs) The refinanced 2008A bonds are then legally defeased (are removed from the District s balance sheet) and the new Series 2016 Bonds become debt of the District 3

Illustrated Results - July 2016 Tab B

Proposed Annual Debt Service Savings* *Based on rates as of June 9, 2016 Date Prior Debt Refunding Debt Service Service Savings Present Value to 07/20/2016 @ 3.1773946% 9/30/2016 2,662,021.25 2,491,375.00 170,646.25 170,273.08 9/30/2017 5,324,042.50 4,519,300.00 804,742.50 784,244.69 9/30/2018 5,324,042.50 4,519,300.00 804,742.50 759,907.63 9/30/2019 7,674,042.50 6,789,300.00 884,742.50 808,947.59 9/30/2020 7,671,542.50 6,785,800.00 885,742.50 784,695.59 9/30/2021 7,673,292.50 6,786,800.00 886,492.50 760,954.99 9/30/2022 7,673,792.50 6,786,800.00 886,992.50 737,724.07 9/30/2023 7,666,292.50 6,780,550.00 885,742.50 713,822.43 9/30/2024 7,672,267.50 6,783,050.00 889,217.50 694,417.44 9/30/2025 7,668,267.50 6,783,550.00 884,717.50 669,460.09 9/30/2026 7,667,017.50 6,781,800.00 885,217.50 649,023.07 9/30/2027 7,673,017.50 6,787,550.00 885,467.50 629,032.01 9/30/2028 7,668,357.50 6,780,050.00 888,307.50 611,441.09 9/30/2029 7,674,437.50 6,789,550.00 884,887.50 590,209.72 9/30/2030 7,674,687.50 6,789,800.00 884,887.50 571,868.56 9/30/2031 7,670,437.50 6,785,800.00 884,637.50 553,940.66 9/30/2032 7,671,437.50 6,783,000.00 888,437.50 538,819.08 9/30/2033 7,666,937.50 6,778,800.00 888,137.50 521,689.75 9/30/2034 7,671,687.50 6,783,000.00 888,687.50 505,566.88 9/30/2035 7,674,687.50 6,785,000.00 889,687.50 490,169.15 9/30/2036 17,415,437.50 16,529,600.00 885,837.50 472,643.57 9/30/2037 17,416,437.50 16,526,800.00 889,637.50 459,252.58 9/30/2038 17,414,687.50 16,525,600.00 889,087.50 444,011.29 195,968,871.25 176,452,175.00 19,516,696.25 13,922,115.03 5

Proposed Summary of Refinancing Results* Dated Date 7/20/2016 Delivery Date 7/20/2016 Arbitrage yield 2.639632% Escrow yield 0.754974% Value of Negative Arbitrage 4,286,909.20 Bond Par Amount 106,135,000.00 True Interest Cost 3.141696% Net Interest Cost 3.377467% All-In TIC 3.177395% Average Coupon 4.197024% Average Life 15.786 Weighted Average Maturity 15.591 Par amount of refunded bonds 107,840,000.00 Average coupon of refunded bonds 4.934132% Average life of refunded bonds 16.132 Remaining weighted average maturity of refunded bonds 16.132 PV of prior debt to 07/20/2016 @ 3.177395% 133,298,023.28 Net PV Savings 13,923,213.56 Percentage savings of refunded bonds 12.910992% Percentage savings of refunding bonds 13.118400% *Based on rates as of June 9, 2016 6

Illustrated Results - Current Situation Tab C

Illustrated Interest Rate Movements 8

Proposed Annual Debt Service Savings* *Based on rates as of February 27, 2017 Date Prior Debt Refunding Debt Service Service Savings Present Value to 03/23/2017 @ 4.0061785% 9/30/2017 2,662,021.25 2,471,911.94 190,109.31 187,158.01 9/30/2018 5,324,042.50 5,129,750.00 194,292.50 185,678.85 9/30/2019 7,674,042.50 7,304,750.00 369,292.50 337,601.73 9/30/2020 7,671,542.50 7,301,000.00 370,542.50 325,488.53 9/30/2021 7,673,292.50 7,307,000.00 366,292.50 309,182.48 9/30/2022 7,673,792.50 7,307,000.00 366,792.50 297,485.42 9/30/2023 7,666,292.50 7,296,000.00 370,292.50 288,581.76 9/30/2024 7,672,267.50 7,304,250.00 368,017.50 275,682.65 9/30/2025 7,668,267.50 7,300,500.00 367,767.50 264,708.72 9/30/2026 7,667,017.50 7,300,000.00 367,017.50 253,823.49 9/30/2027 7,673,017.50 7,307,250.00 365,767.50 243,050.18 9/30/2028 7,668,357.50 7,301,500.00 366,857.50 234,234.96 9/30/2029 7,674,437.50 7,308,000.00 366,437.50 224,835.61 9/30/2030 7,674,687.50 7,305,750.00 368,937.50 217,487.88 9/30/2031 7,670,437.50 7,299,750.00 370,687.50 209,943.64 9/30/2032 7,671,437.50 7,304,750.00 366,687.50 199,530.88 9/30/2033 7,666,937.50 7,299,750.00 367,187.50 191,956.39 9/30/2034 7,671,687.50 7,304,750.00 366,937.50 184,289.31 9/30/2035 7,674,687.50 7,308,750.00 365,937.50 176,563.06 9/30/2036 17,415,437.50 17,046,250.00 369,187.50 171,124.74 9/30/2037 17,416,437.50 17,050,000.00 366,437.50 163,166.00 9/30/2038 17,414,687.50 17,046,750.00 367,937.50 157,383.27 190,644,828.75 182,905,411.94 7,739,416.81 5,098,957.57 9

Proposed Summary of Refinancing Results* Dated Date 3/23/2017 Delivery Date 3/23/2017 Arbitrage yield 3.500544% Escrow yield 0.919969% Value of Negative Arbitrage 3,900,828.35 Bond Par Amount 103,040,000.00 True Interest Cost 3.962808% Net Interest Cost 4.255630% All-In TIC 4.006178% Average Coupon 4.999670% Average Life 15.503 Weighted Average Maturity 15.442 Par amount of refunded bonds 107,840,000.00 Average coupon of refunded bonds 4.934008% Average life of refunded bonds 15.457 Remaining weighted average maturity of refunded bonds 15.457 PV of prior debt to 03/23/2017 @ 4.006178% 119,489,353.42 Net PV Savings 5,099,981.98 Percentage savings of refunded bonds 4.729212% Percentage savings of refunding bonds 4.949517% *Based on rates as of February 27, 2017 10

Comparison of 2016 to Present July 2016 March 2017 Delivery Date Bond Par Amount True Interest Cost All-In TIC Average Life 7/20/2016 3/23/2017 106,135,000.00 103,040,000.00 3.141696% 3.962808% 3.177395% 4.006178% 15.786 15.503 Percentage savings of refunded bonds Percentage savings of refunding bonds Gross Savings Net PV Savings Value of Negative Arbitrage Par amount of refunded bonds 12.910992% 4.729212% 13.118400% 4.949517% 19,516,696.25 7,739,416.81 13,923,213.56 5,099,981.98 4,286,909.20 3,900,828.35 107,840,000.00 107,840,000.00 11

Other Considerations Bond Ratings S&P confirmed it s A- rating with a negative outlook Cited weakened balance sheet with the rating agency s belief that supplemental payments will remain low, limiting the District s ability to replenish liquidity reserves Hilltop Securities, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and management have initiated discussions with Moody s related to establishing a third bond rating We believe that any Moody s rating of A1 or higher will decrease the interest cost on the refunding bonds and increase annual debt service savings Each 1 basis point (0.0001%) of decreased interest cost increases NPV savings by approximately $80,000 Moody s historically rated the District A1 Authorizing resolutions Due to higher interest rates, we are asking both the District board and the County Commissioners Court to adjust the authorized parameters to sell the refunding bonds TIC not to exceed 4.15% NPV savings of at least 3.50% of refunded par value 12