Statement to the House of Commons Standing Committee on International Trade

Similar documents
Statement to the Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture and Forestry

Japan s New Trade Policy in Asia-Pacific

Updating NAFTA: Implications of the Trans-Pacific and Trans-Atlantic Partnerships

A TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Kentucky. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Kentucky. Jobs Exports Investment 52%

OVERLOOKED FACTS ABOUT

A TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Kansas. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Kansas. Jobs Exports Investment 48%

Comments in Response to Executive Order Regarding Trade Agreements Violations and Abuses Docket No. USTR

ANZ Submission to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade White Paper Public Consultation

A TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for North Dakota. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for North Dakota. Jobs Exports Investment 62%

The EU and Vietnam: Taking (Trade) Relations to the Next Level

International Trade Agreements and Emerging Markets

Korea and the TPP: The Inevitable Partnership Jeffrey J. Schott Senior Fellow Peterson Institute for International Economics

Canada Gazette, 12 April 2003; volume 137, no. 15

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Nevada

The Coalition s Policy for Trade

Submission to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance. Priorities for the 2015 Federal Budget

15.6 M 45% 17,770. The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for the United States. Overview. What Is the TPP?

42,000 54% 40+ The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for North Dakota. Overview. What Is the TPP?

A TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Oklahoma. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Oklahoma. Jobs Exports Investment 53%

TPP11 Agreement in Principle: Japan s Role in Mega-regional Trade Agreements

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for New Jersey. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for New Jersey. Jobs Exports Investment

Japan s FTA Strategy. August 7, Shujiro URATA Waseda University

A TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Pennsylvania. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Pennsylvania. Jobs Exports Investment 46%

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Maryland. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Maryland. Jobs Exports Investment

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Maine. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Maine. Jobs Exports Investment

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Indiana. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Indiana. Jobs Exports Investment

overview FACT SHEET trans-pacific partnership TPP

Re: Consulting Canadians on a possible Canada-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Delaware. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Delaware. Jobs Exports Investment

RIETI Special Seminar. The New Landscape of World Trade with Mega-FTAs and Japan's Strategy. Handout. URATA Shujiro

India s Trade Policy and Global Trade Initiatives

Economic Impact of Canada s Potential Participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

49,000 46% 55. The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for South Dakota. Overview. What Is the TPP?

A TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Vermont. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Vermont. Jobs Exports Investment 57%

Economic Nationalism: Reality or Rhetoric? Ian Sheldon AED Economics Ohio State University. AAII Columbus Chapter November 8, 2017

EU Trade Policy and CETA

Economic Impact of Canada s Participation in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership

A new EU trade agreement with Japan

CHUNG Chul: Looking Forward To Working at a Deeper Level. of Free Trade

JAPAN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM AUSTRALIA

INTERNATIONAL TRADE ISSUE PAPER Jose E. Martinez President & CEO Free Trade Alliance

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Colorado. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Colorado. Jobs Exports Investment

Trans-Pacific Partnership

Current Status and Future Prospects of the TPP Negotiations

A TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Colorado. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Colorado. Jobs Exports Investment 48%

México and NAFTA. CSG WEST Annual Meeting (AFBF) Vail, Colorado July 31th 2015

USCIB Trade and Investment Agenda 2018

Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for North Carolina. Jobs Exports Investment

The Relative Significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific

Increasing Productivity and Competitiveness through Trade (EU-Japan FTA/EPA, TPP) June 2014 Jun ARIMA Director General, JETRO London

Introduction. Institute for International Economics Institute for International Economics

Introduction. Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, published last fall, gained insights from the relevant academic and policy

The Relative Significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific

FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

China / Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) Maximising Opportunities. December 2014

Services Trade: Essential Fuel for U.S. and Global Economic Growth

Japan-ASEAN Comprehensive Economic Partnership

International Trade Bulletin

Division on Investment and Enterprise

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Vermont. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Vermont. Jobs Exports Investment

Thailand and TPP 30 November 2012 Apiradi Tantraporn, Executive Chairperson The International Institute for Asia Pacific Studies (INSAPS), Bangkok

Impacts on Global Trade and Income of Current Trade Disputes

2019 USCIB Trade and Investment Agenda

FACILITATING TRADE: NAFTA TODAY AND TOMORROW

EFTA FREE TRADE RELATIONS

The CETA and British Columbia: Impacts and Opportunities

2011 Australian APEC Study Centre Conference

The TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Delaware. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Delaware. Jobs Exports Investment

Plurilateralism: A New Way of Trade Liberalism?

World Economy: Prospects and Risks Masahiro Kawai Graduate School of Public Policy Univ. of Tokyo

An Assessment of the Korea-China Free Trade Agreement

Parallel Session 7: Regional integration

How CETA Will Benefit the

Associate Professor, Dr Pham Thi Hong Yen Central Economic Commission Viet Nam

United States House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality

Elephants in a bazaar?

Harnessing Globalisation to Build a Better World for the Benefit of All. Yose Rizal Damuri Centre for Strategic and International Studies

AdvantageBC. September 19, Don Campbell

EUROPEAN BUSINESS COUNCIL (EBC) Call for Preliminary Talks on an EU-Japan Economic Integration Agreement. June 03, 2007

Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

REMARKS BY H.E. MR. SOEGENG RAHARDJO INDONESIAN AMBASSADOR AT THE RISK MANAGEMENT FOR OUTBOUND INVESTMENTS WORKSHOP BEIJING, 24 OCTOBER 2014

NAFTA AT EIGHT A FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH

Chapter 2 Development of rules, including trade agreements

Market Access Opportunities in Australia s North Asian FTAs. Kristen Bondietti Principal Trade Consultant ITS Global

Event 1. Module 2. The Converging Strands Between Trade and Investment Session Two: The mega regionals, impacts for members and non-members

Study Questions. Lecture 1 Overview of the World Economy

Trade in New England. Export-Supported U.S. Jobs (2014) Merchandise Exports (2015)

WRITTEN SUBMISSON OF THE NATIONAL FOREIGN TRADE COUNCIL

SUMMARY OF THE 2015 NEW ZEALAND BUSINESS OPERATIONS SURVEY: INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENT

RE: American Chemistry Council Public Comments on U.S. Objectives for U.S.-UK Trade Negotiations

Hedging Our Bet: A Diversification Strategy for Canadian Trade. by Brian Kingston

The Importance of CJK FTA for the Development of Trilateral Cooperation

Reviewing the Importance. for Indonesia

Michael Growder. Assistant Secretary Free Trade Agreement Division Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

How CETA Will Benefit

Productivity Commission Study into Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements. ANZ Submission

Country note on Trade and Investment Policy Coordination Country: Indonesia

Trade Policy. U.S. Advanced Manufacturing Plan

Current Status and Challenges. May 14, Shujiro URATA Waseda University

SFIA Legal Task Force Series: Updates on Changing International Trade Landscape Webinar

Transcription:

Statement to the House of Commons Standing Committee on International Trade Regarding the Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement Ailish Campbell, Vice President, Policy, International and Fiscal Issues

Mr. Chairman, committee members, thank you for the invitation to appear before the Committee on International Trade to discuss the Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement. Before I being my remarks, please let me recognize the new Chair, MP Randy Hoback. I would also like to enter in to the record best wishes to the former Chair of this committee, MP Rob Merrifield, who retired from Parliament in September to become Alberta s representative in Washington. The Canadian Council of Chief Executives wishes Mr. Merrifield all the best in his new role, and thanks him for his on-going service to Canadians. The is a not-for-profit, non-partisan organization composed of the CEOs of 150 leading Canadian enterprises. Member companies collectively administer $4.5 trillion in assets, have annual revenues in excess of $850 billion, and are responsible for the majority of Canada's exports, investment, research and development, and training. Nous sommes responsables d un programme actif de recherches, de consultation et de défense en matière de politiques publiques. Le CCCE est source de commentaires bien réfléchis et fondés sur la perspective des affaires sur des questions d importance nationale au niveau de la structure économique et sociale du Canada. I would like to table for the Committee s consideration three key points concerning Canada s FTA with Korea: 1. The CCCE supports the rapid ratification of the free trade agreement with South Korea. The Canada-Korea FTA must be implemented on January 1, 2015. This is vital so that Canadian firms do not fall further behind U.S. competitors as the Koreans phase in tariff cuts under their various bilateral trade agreements. 2

Canadian exports to South Korea have dropped by nearly one-third since the implementation of the U.S. deal. The Canada-Korea FTA gives our exporters a fighting chance to regain lost market share and, in so doing, protect jobs in Canada. I take note of the support for this agreement from the Conservative government, the New Democratic Party, and the Liberal Party of Canada. All three parties agree that increasing Canada s trade ties with Asia is necessary in order to ensure Canada s prosperity in the 21 st century. As a result of this agreement, Canadian companies will enjoy enhanced opportunities to sell products and services to South Korean consumers and participate in South Korean-based supply chains. If the EU is counted as one entity, Korea is Canada's 6th largest export market for goods and is Canada's 6th largest supplier. The two nations also rank in each other s top 10 for two-way services trade and intermediate goods trade, which is an indicator of strong activity in global value chains. Korea has 13 companies on the 2012 Fortune 500 list, compared to Canada s 11. Only the United States, China, the EU, Japan and Mexico have more trade with Canada than does Korea. President Park, in her state visit to Canada two weeks ago, highlighted the creative economy as a sector in which to deepen bilateral trade, including television and video game content. Other priority sectors for growing the trade and investment relationship illustrate the diversity of trade between the two nations: financial services, professional services such as engineering, agri-food, seafood, clean tech, energy products including LNG, forestry products, metals, aerospace and advanced manufacturing. All of these sectors, and more, are ripe for increased commercial activity and partnerships. In the auto sector, Canadian firms have tabled their concerns with this agreement. They have highlighted that the U.S.-Korea free trade agreement has not yet resulted in the boost in auto trade that was expected. 3

The CCCE recommends the development of a specific auto sector strategy for the Korean market to ensure that Canadian auto and auto-parts manufacturers are positioned for success. Such a strategy could examine exports, two-way foreign direct investment and non-tariff barriers as well as cooperation with other major auto and auto-parts nations with free trade agreements with Korea to ensure an open market for foreign products. 2. Government and business must be partners in ensuring the effective implementation of the Canada-Korea FTA. Cooperation between the Trade Commissioner Service, Export Development Canada, Business Development Canada, Canada s Embassy and consulates in Korea and firms active and interested in Korea is essential to realizing the success of this agreement. The United States, the European Union and Australia have already concluded trade agreements with South Korea. The lead time these nations have in their tariff reduction schedules and implementation of commitments put Canadian companies at a competitive disadvantage. The CCCE recommends the creation of an Advisory Committee to Minister Ed Fast on the implementation and promotion of the South Korea FTA. The largest traders and investors, including those with significant foreign affiliate presence in Korea, should be the core members of this Advisory Committee, as they have the greatest experience in the South Korean market and manage the supply chains which could be access points for small and medium-sized firms. To measure success of the Canada-Korea FTA, it is important that the starting point is well understood. Canada imports far more from Korea - $7.3 billion in 2013 than it exports, $3.5 billion. Korea invests more in Canada, at almost $5 billion in 2013, compared to Canadian investment in Korea that sits at $535 million. Foreign affiliate sales are also on the rise. Outcomes of the FTA should be measured annually with milestones such as increased trade, FDI, and sales in South Korea by Canadian foreign affiliates, joint ventures and revenue from licencing agreements. 4

The advisory committee recommended by the CCCE, along with institutions such as the Asia Pacific Foundation led by Stewart Beck, could contribute to promoting broader Canadian awareness and understanding of South Korea, including its stable democracy, its interest in a peaceful Asia region and its highly innovative economy. As John Weekes, Canada s former Ambassador to the WTO, has pointed out: marketing is essential and understanding the thinking of Korean consumers is critical if the potential benefits of this FTA are to be realized. The partnership approach in which business and government are aligned and execute on opportunities is critical success and is at the core of the government s Global Markets Action Plan. 3. The Canada-Korea FTA is only the first step. Deeper Canadian engagement with the Asia region is of vital importance to our future. The South Korea FTA is a concrete step forward in government-led initiatives in the region. The CCCE congratulates Minister Ed Fast, Canada s Chief Negotiator Ian Burney, and the entire trade negotiating team at DFAT-D for concluding Canada s first FTA with an Asian nation. The Canada-Korea agreement represents a turning point in Canada s long-standing efforts to build closer economic ties with Asia-Pacific markets. It demonstrates to other important economies in the region that Canada is a reliable and serious partner. And it offers a base from which Canadian companies can reach out to other fast-growing markets. CCCE members are already active across Asian markets, and want to do more business in high-growth nations from India to Indonesia. Concrete next steps for the government could include a bilateral economic partnership agreement with Japan. Concluding the Economic Partnership Agreement with Japan should be a priority given the strong foreign direct investment relationship, Japan s need for energy resources and opportunity for further trade in agriculture products and manufactured goods. 5

Canada also needs a leader-to-leader Strategic Partnership with China, similar to what Australia has accomplished, and that could lead to enhanced commerce in sectors of mutual interest. The government should also consider, as New Zealand has done, the negotiation of a free trade agreement with China. I would be happy to take questions on Korea and the CCCE s broader priorities for Asia, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), should this be of interest to committee members. Our CEO members and their companies look forward to the implementation of the Canada-Korea FTA, and the hard work to expand Canada s commercial engagement across the diverse Asia region. Thank you for the opportunity to express the CCCE s support for the Canada-Korea FTA. 6