National Mortgage Settlement

Similar documents
2015 STAR Best Practices

Supplemental Directive May 11, Home Affordable Unemployment Program. Help for Unemployed Borrowers. Background

Supplemental Directive October 18, 2013

Loss Mitigation Procedures ALL FIRM CLIENTS. Adam J. Friedman, Esq. DATE: January 10, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Changes

A Report from the Monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement October 22, 2015

New CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules (Part 2): Loss Mitigation Procedures. John Rao Lisa Sitkin Josh Zinner

Servicing Standards Quarterly Compliance Metrics Executive Summary

New Servicing Rules under RESPA Early Intervention, Continuous Contact and Loss Mitigation

National Foreclosure Mitigation Counseling Program Events of Default and Remedies Policy. Updated: December 5, 2016

Supplemental Directive March 1, 2013

Servicer Compliance with CFPB Servicing Regulations

Making Home Affordable MHA and Impacts from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureaus New Mortgage Servicing Regulations

What is the Servicing Alignment Initiative? Overview:

HOMEOWNER WELCOME PACKAGE. Short Sale Frequently Asked Questions

TO: Freddie Mac Sellers and Servicers October 3, 2012

Once we have received and evaluated your information, we will contact you regarding your options and next steps.

Appendix C Remedial Action Plan

Effective Foreclosure Timeline Management Reference Guide

Faith Schwartz Testifies at TARP Foreclosure Mitigation Programs Hearing

Supplemental Directive January 28, Home Affordable Modification Program Program Update and Resolution of Active Trial Modifications

SUBJECT: SERVICING UPDATES

A Report from the Monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement May 14, 2014

Announcement SVC September 21, 2010

First Lien Modification Program Home Affordable Modification Program. Phase 1 Engagement

CFPB National Servicing Standards, Are Servicers Ready?

Early Delinquency Intervention: Saving Your Home From Foreclosure

Litigation Department: Phase I litigation Phase II Litigation:

Early Delinquency Intervention SAVING YOUR HOME FROM FORECLOSURE

HOPE NOW Reports 99K Mortgage Solutions for Homeowners in November K Permanent Loan Modifications Completed for the Month

A Report from the Monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement June 30, 2015

Servicing Alignment Initiative Overview for Freddie Mac Servicers

What happens during the Foreclosure Process in St. Johns County Florida?

REFORMS Overview of Reforms to Mortgage and Foreclosure Processing Standards in the Settlement

Home Affordable Modification Program Policies and Procedures Manual

[Address of Borrower] [Loan #] [Date] RE: Acknowledgement of Request for Short Sale

TO: Freddie Mac Servicers August 15, 2013

FREDDIE MAC Q&A: APPRAISER INDEPENDENCE REQUIREMENTS

Instructions for Completing the Short Sale Package. Send Ocwen the completed package and supporting documentation

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY CONSENT ORDER

WORRIED. about Foreclosure? HAFA MAY BE ABLE TO HELP HOME AFFORDABLE FORECLOSURE ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (HAFA)

Click here to unlock PDFKit.NET

Supplemental Directive November 3, Home Affordable Modification Program Borrower Notices

Dodd-Frank Implementation Checklist

Uniform Rules of Practice Circuit Court of Illinois Nineteenth Judicial Circuit

National Foreclosure Mitigation Counseling Program

Randall S Kroszner: Legislative proposals on reforming mortgage practices

TOPIC CFPB HBOR NMS. January 10, January 1, April 4, Servicers and sub-servicers; not trustees acting under a DOT (a).

Early Delinquency Intervention

Making Home Affordable Case Escalation Process Training Presentation for Servicers

November 11, Early Resolution is Inconsistent with the CFPB s Loss Mitigation Requirements

August 2016 CFPB Servicing Rule Amendments - Early Implementation Chart 1

Mortgage Processing Policy Manual Table of Contents [Sample Client] Table of Contents

Information on Avoiding Foreclosure

TO: Freddie Mac Servicers November 9, 2012

Making Home Affordable Program Dodd-Frank Certification, Internal Quality Assurance and Verification of Income Update

Supplemental Directive December 21, 2017

By electronic delivery. September 17, 2004

HOW THE CALDWELL QC PLAN MEETS HUD REQUIREMENTS

Waushara County Circuit Court Rules

MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION OF ALABAMA

US Bank loan modification paperwork

Deanne R. Stodden. Member, Rogers & Stodden, LLC Of Counsel, Carpenter & Klatskin, PC

Statement of Donald Bisenius Executive Vice President Single Family Credit Guarantee Business Freddie Mac

Senate Bill No. 818 CHAPTER 404

June 29, 2011 Acting Director Edward DeMarco Federal Housing Finance Agency 1700 G Street, NW, 4th Floor Washington, DC 20552

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

Industry Letter. To: Freddie Mac Sellers and Servicers October 19, Page 1

HOPE NOW: 319,000 Non-Foreclosure Solutions for Homeowners during Q1 2016

Welcome to your Homeowner s Guide to Success

Default Management Servicing Guide

Supervisory Highlights Consumer Reporting Special Edition

HOPE NOW: 444,000 Non-Foreclosure Solutions for Homeowners during Q1 2015

Kentucky Housing Corporation. NMS Counseling Program Manual

HOPE NOW: 181K Loan Modifications for Homeowners During Q3 2013

STANDARD MODIFICATION

TO: Freddie Mac Servicers February 15, 2013

A Report from the Monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement May 19, 2016

Foreclosure Process in Minnesota

Billing Code DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. [Docket No. FR-5735-N-05]

Available at:

Communicating with Borrowers: Collections and Loss Mitigation Reference Guide

HAMP Trusted Advisor 1

ASB Meeting October 16-19, Discussion Memorandum High Level Feedback on Responses to Issues for Consideration

Supplemental Directive September 30, 2014

CHAPTER 3: LENDER APPROVAL 7 CFR

Supplemental Directive December 10, 2013

HOPE NOW Alliance. Statement for the Record. Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. U.S. House of Representatives. Hearing

Supplemental Documentation Frequently Asked Questions Home Affordable Modification Program Conversion Campaign

Summary of Compliance. A Report from the Monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement

SECTION MULTI-FAMILY DELINQUENCY SERVICING

Florida Green Commercial Building Designation Standard

SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Delinquency Management for Mortgages Secured by Primary Residences

Implementation Plan Your Keys to Success

Early Delinquency Intervention Workbook

Affordability: Modifications should provide affordable payments and terms. Sustainability: Modifications should produce long term performance.

TIM KELLY & ASSOCIATES Attorneys at Law

Supplemental Directive November 30, 2012

To expedite processing: Fax To: 1 (407) or Scan and To:

Information & Instructions: Demand letter opportunity to cure and intent to accelerate the note

Transcription:

October t 2013 VIA EMAIL Pam Bondi Attorney General for the State of Florida The Capitol PL-0 1 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050 Re: National Mortgage Settlement Dear General Bondi: We write to provide an update on the constructive ongoing engagement we have been having with your office to address the issues that you raised in your letter of June 4, 2013. We believe that our regular interactions with your office have provided us useful information about the experiences of Florida borrowers. Following the leadership role taken by you and your office in negotiating the historic National Mortgage Settlement (NMS) approximately 18 months ago, you and your office have provided wise counsel, both independently and as part of the NMS Monitoring Committee, that has helped shape the improvements to our processes that we are presently implementing. We appreciate both the cooperative approach that your office has taken and the level of expertise and substance that your office brings to the table on borrowerassistance issues. We also appreciate the extensive efforts that your office has put forth since the execution of the agreement, especially over the last six months, including attending numerous meetings, both in-person and by telephone, spending countless hours reviewing and revising the new metrics and related items, and analyzing feedback from borrowers and housing counselors to look for common themes for us to focus collectively on. We also want to make clear that Bank of America remains committed to improving the loss mitigation process for our borrowers. As part of this process, we have increased our engagement with individual state attorneys general such as yourself and the NMS Monitoring Committee. We are taking these steps as part of a collaborative engagement with state attorneys general and the NMS Monitoring Committee designed to increase our performance in the loan

modification process above and beyond what is required under the NMS. Indeed, we believe that the NMS is working as intended, including with respect to the servicing standard metric testing requirements and the remediation provisions for metrics where the testing results exceed the permitted threshold error rates. Borrower Communications One question that you raised concerned borrower communications relating to loan modifications. We are also working to address any issues in this area. As an initial matter, our analysis shows that the vast majority of borrowers receive a loan modification decision in a relatively short period of time. As a result of missing document letters, improved document management processes, and the efforts of the Single Points of Contact (known as Customer Relationship Managers (CRMs) at Bank of America), most borrowers are moving quickly through loan modification document collection and decisioning. That said, we recognize that there are sometimes situations where delays occur, particularly where underwriting is complex due to, for example, the borrower being self-employed or experiencing changes in marital circumstances. We are committed both to continue to move the vast majority of the borrowers through the loan modification application process promptly while also lessening the amount of time that it sometimes takes to collect documents (and then make a decision) in these more complex applications. There are multiple means of communication with borrowers in the loan modification process. Our CRMs are required to have contact with borrowers every seven days while a loan is being evaluated for a retention solution. A series of defined welcome and status call routines seek to ensure that a borrower is kept informed throughout the process and is afforded opportunities to ask questions directly to his or her assigned CRM. In addition to our verbal communication routines, written communications are a key aspect of our communication strategy. In an ongoing effort to continuously improve borrower experience, we recently reviewed our loss mitigation letters based on feedback from our CRMs, borrowers, the Monitoring Committee, and other NMS signatories. We identified a population of approximately 600 letters that will be changed or eliminated through this work A significant number of these letters will be retired from use by the end of the year, and another substantial number will see changes to improve the clarity of their content.

One particular area of focus has been our communications with borrowers when we are collecting documents in connection with the loss mitigation process. After receiving the first modification-relevant document from a borrower, a series of designated steps (routines) begins in order to review documents while keeping borrowers informed of document deficiencies or additional documents required. Our process of sending acknowledgements, incomplete information notices, and requests for additional information are designed to keep the borrower informed of document collection status. In addition to the significant improvements we have made in uploading and tracking documents, we are also enhancing the level of detail provided to customers about missing documents and document deficiencies. The Incomplete Information Notice, which is sent to the borrower within five days of receiving a modification document, is being augmented to present more specific information regarding any document deficiency. Requests for additional information beyond the Incomplete Information Notice will begin using the Additional Document Request Letter (provided for by one of the new NMS metrics ), which will parallel the Incomplete Information Notice in the level of detail and clarity provided. These letters communicate deficiencies while borrowers are afforded 30 additional days of protection each time additional information is requested. Both the Incomplete Information Notice and the Additional Document Request Letter will be generated using an interactive checklist tool. Document lists and deficiency detail will be based on borrower circumstances, RMA answers, and a list of QA reasons that the associate must validate. This additional automation is expected to increase the completeness of information requests, ultimately reducing the number of required follow-up communications. In addition to these improvements to the Incomplete Information Notice and Additional Document Request Letter, our Evaluation Notices and decline reasons will also be enhanced. All approvals and declines will be provided in one Evaluation Notice. The notice will include all decline reasons and indicate programs for which the borrower was not considered. Additionally, we have reviewed all of our decline reasons and improved the text where needed to ensure that the denial reason is clear and that factual information is provided. Dual Tracking A second area that you have raised involves when the foreclosure process is suspended while a borrower is in the loss mitigation process.

Bank of America... In accordance with investor guidelines, Bank of America proceeds with foreclosure activities until the borrower provides a complete document package required for loan modification. When a full package for loan modification has been received from the borrower, the foreclosure process is suspended, including: scheduling sales or causing judgments to be entered and cancelling a scheduled sale date when a borrower has been offered a loss mitigation option, where permissible by state law. We have strong controls, account level reviews and reporting designed to prevent a borrower from going to foreclosure sale in error. Leading up to a sale date, we have implemented multiple checkpoints to ensure that appropriate steps are taken to exhaust all foreclosure alternatives in home retention or home transition. Servicing Borrowers in Litigation You also raised with us the challenges that arise when borrowers in litigation with the Bank seek loss mitigation. Following your letter, we have engaged in a series of calls with your office to address these challenges. As a result, we have been improving the training for our CRMs who deal with borrowers in litigation with the Bank so that they can better engage with borrowers represented by counsel. We have also been creating new letters to address borrowers who are in litigation with the Bank. Because we are hopeful that these changes will substantially improve the loss mitigation experience for borrowers in litigation, we intend to roll out the strategies that we have developed with your office to all borrowers nationwide. In that regard, the input from your office will benefit not only Florida borrowers, but also borrowers beyond your state line. * * * * * We appreciate the ongoing partnership with your office and the Florida housing counselors who help to guide our borrowers through this challenging time in their financial lives. As part of our commitment to assist borrowers struggling to meet their mortgage payments, Bank of America is continuing to invest resources to refine its loss mitigation practices and procedures. These efforts include the items discussed in this letter, activities to ensure Bank of America adheres to the NMS servicing standards, and additional opportunities that we will identify in the

future. We look forward to the opportunity to continue working together to assist Florida borrowers.