English - Or. English NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY COMMITTEE ON THE SAFETY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS

Similar documents
The Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia takes part in some of the work of the OECD (agreement of 28th October 1961).

Recommendation of the Council on Tax Avoidance and Evasion

Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

OECD Report Shows Tax Burdens Falling in Many OECD Countries

Guidance on Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting

Recommendation of the Council on the Implementation of the Polluter-Pays Principle

Statistical annex. Sources and definitions

Declaration on Environmental Policy

International Nuclear Law Essentials. Programme

Third Revised Decision of the Council concerning National Treatment

LONG-TERM PROJECTIONS OF PUBLIC PENSION EXPENDITURE

Approach to Employment Injury (EI) compensation benefits in the EU and OECD

Working Party on Private Pensions

OECD Health Policy Unit. 10 June, 2001

Guidance on Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting

Recommendation of the Council on Establishing and Implementing Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (PRTRs)

Statistical Annex ANNEX

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2016

Corrigendum. OECD Pensions Outlook 2012 DOI: ISBN (print) ISBN (PDF) OECD 2012

COMPARISON OF RIA SYSTEMS IN OECD COUNTRIES

STATISTICS. Taxing Wages DIS P O NIB LE E N SPECIAL FEATURE: PART-TIME WORK AND TAXING WAGES

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2017

8-Jun-06 Personal Income Top Marginal Tax Rate,

Working Party on International Trade in Goods and Trade in Services Statistics

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2018

Glossary of Defined Terms

OECD HEALTH SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS SURVEY 2012

HEALTH LABOUR MARKET TRENDS IN OECD COUNTRIES

Working Group on Integrity and Ageing of Components and Structures (IAGE WG)

PRIORITY RULES ON COMPENSATION FOR NUCLEAR DAMAGE IN NATIONAL LEGISLATIONS

Burden of Taxation: International Comparisons

Low employment among the 50+ population in Hungary

Indicator B3 How much public and private investment in education is there?

Performance Budgeting (PB) in OECD Countries

Sources of Government Revenue across the OECD, 2015

Collective Bargaining in OECD and accession countries

BETTER POLICIES FOR A SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2014

OECD GOOD PRACTICES OF PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT

TREATY SERIES 2003 Nº 2. Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions

Statistical Annex. Sources and definitions

Recommendation of the Council concerning Consumer Protection in the Field of Consumer Credit

PENSIONS IN OECD COUNTRIES: INDICATORS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Health Care in Crisis

OECD Recommendation on Consumer Dispute Resolution and Redress

October 2017 degroofpetercam.com. Sustainability Ranking. Developed Countries

FCCC/SBI/2010/10/Add.1

Ageing and employment policies: Ireland

Pension Fund Investment and Regulation - An International Perspective and Implications for China s Pension System

English - Or. French EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF TRANSPORT COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

The outcomes of the meeting which were agreed by participants 1, as well as the next steps in the process, are set out below 2.

Double-Taxing Capital Income: How Bad Is the Problem?

ICT, knowledge and the economy 2012 Statistical annex

Financial situation by the end of Table 1. ECPGR Contributions for Phase IX received by 31 December 2017 (in Euro)...3

Revenue Arrangements for Implementing EU and OECD Exchange of Information Requirements In Respect of Tax Rulings

Financial situation by the end of Table 1. ECPGR Contributions for Phase IX received by 31 December 2016 (in Euro)...3

Seventeenth Meeting of the IMF Committee on Balance of Payments Statistics Pretoria, October 26 29, 2004

Switzerland and Germany top the PwC Young Workers Index in developing younger people

Household Financial Wealth By Selected Country

DEVELOPMENT AID AT A GLANCE

Good practices in pension supervision in the OECD area. Fiona Stewart Bangkok, April 2005

International Statistical Release

FINANCIAL PLAN for CONSTRUCTION and EXPLOITATION PHASE

International Statistical Release

TAX POLICY CENTER BRIEFING BOOK. Background. Q. What are the sources of revenue for the federal government?

ANNEX 3.A1. Description of indicators and method

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION AND PREVENTION (AIG) DIVISIONAL MEETING (2008)

Reporting practices for domestic and total debt securities

Fiscal Projections in OECD Countries: What is produced and what lessons can be learned?

Updates and revisions of national SUTs for the November 2013 release of the WIOD

Private pensions. A growing role. Who has a private pension?

1 st Topical Peer Review Public event 22 nd November 2018 Brussels. P. Tiippana TPR Board Chairman

NOTE. for the Interparliamentary Meeting of the Committee on Budgets

The Case for Fundamental Tax Reform: Overview of the Current Tax System

Global Economic Briefing: Global Inflation

10% 10% 15% 15% Caseload: WE. 15% Caseload: SS 10% 10% 15%

Programme for Government Joe Reynolds Director Programme for Government and Delivering Social Change

American healthcare: How do we measure up?

Growth in OECD Unit Labour Costs slows to 0.4% in the third quarter of 2016

American healthcare: How do we measure up?

Electricity & Gas Prices in Ireland. Annex Business Electricity Prices per kwh 2 nd Semester (July December) 2016

EMPLOYABILITY AND LABOUR MARKET

International Statistical Release

Behaviour in Business A Guide to Integrity in Business Transactions

Ways to increase employment

THE SEARCH FOR FISCAL SPACE AND THE NEW CHALLENGES TO BUDGETING. 34 th annual meeting of Senior Budget Officials Paris, 3-4 June, 2013

INTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY COOPERATION (IFNEC)

Green Climate Fund Trust Fund Financial Report as of 31 December 2015

Trends in Retirement and in Working at Older Ages

A Comparison of the Tax Burden on Labor in the OECD, 2017

THIRD MEETING OF THE OECD FORUM ON TAX ADMINISTRATION

International Statistical Release

Chapter 2. Non-core funding of multilaterals

Switzerland implements spontaneous exchange of information

Statistics Brief. OECD Countries Spend 1% of GDP on Road and Rail Infrastructure on Average. Infrastructure Investment. June

FOURTH MEETING OF THE OECD FORUM ON TAX ADMINISTRATION January Cape Town Communiqué 11 January 2008

Donor Government Funding for Family Planning in 2016

FORTY-SEVENTH SESSION OF THE IPCC Paris, France, March 2018

FEES SCHEDULE (COPPER / GOLD)

TAXATION OF TRUSTS IN ISRAEL. An Opportunity For Foreign Residents. Dr. Avi Nov

Transcription:

Unclassified NEA/CSNI/R(2002)17 NEA/CSNI/R(2002)17 Unclassified Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 19-Aug-2002 English - Or. English NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY COMMITTEE ON THE SAFETY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS PROCEDURES FOR INITIATION, COST-SHARING AND MANAGEMENT OF OECD PROJECTS IN NUCLEAR SAFETY English - Or. English JT00130415 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14th December 2000). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention). NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) was established on 1st February 1958 under the name of the OEEC European Nuclear Energy Agency. It received its present designation on 20th April 1972, when Japan became its first non-european full Member. NEA membership today consists of 27 OECD Member countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Commission of the European Communities also takes part in the work of the Agency. The mission of the NEA is: to assist its Member countries in maintaining and further developing, through international co-operation, the scientific, technological and legal bases required for a safe, environmentally friendly and economical use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, as well as to provide authoritative assessments and to forge common understandings on key issues, as input to government decisions on nuclear energy policy and to broader OECD policy analyses in areas such as energy and sustainable development. Specific areas of competence of the NEA include safety and regulation of nuclear activities, radioactive waste management, radiological protection, nuclear science, economic and technical analyses of the nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear law and liability, and public information. The NEA Data Bank provides nuclear data and computer program services for participating countries. In these and related tasks, the NEA works in close collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, with which it has a Co-operation Agreement, as well as with other international organisations in the nuclear field. OECD 2002 Permission to reproduce a portion of this work for non-commercial purposes or classroom use should be obtained through the Centre français d exploitation du droit de copie (CCF), 20, rue des Grands-Augustins, 75006 Paris, France, Tel. (33-1) 44 07 47 70, Fax (33-1) 46 34 67 19, for every country except the United States. In the United States permission should be obtained through the Copyright Clearance Center, Customer Service, (508)750-8400, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, or CCC Online: http://www.copyright.com/. All other applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or part of this book should be made to OECD Publications, 2, rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. 2

COMMITTEE ON THE SAFETY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS The NEA Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations (CSNI) is an international committee made up of scientists and engineers. It was set up in 1973 to develop and co-ordinate the activities of the Nuclear Energy Agency concerning the technical aspects of the design, construction and operation of nuclear installations insofar as they affect the safety of such installations. The Committee s purpose is to foster international co-operation in nuclear safety amongst the OECD Member countries. CSNI constitutes a forum for the exchange of technical information and for collaboration between organisations which can contribute, from their respective backgrounds in research, development, engineering or regulation, to these activities and to the definition of its programme of work. It also reviews the state of knowledge on selected topics of nuclear safety technology and safety assessment, including operating experience. It initiates and conducts programmes identified by these reviews and assessments in order to overcome discrepancies, develop improvements and reach international consensus in different projects and International Standard Problems, and assists in the feedback of the results to participating organisations. Full use is also made of traditional methods of cooperation, such as information exchanges, establishment of working groups and organisation of conferences and specialist meeting. The greater part of CSNI s current programme of work is concerned with safety technology of water reactors. The principal areas covered are operating experience and the human factor, reactor coolant system behaviour, various aspects of reactor component integrity, the phenomenology of radioactive releases in reactor accidents and their confinement, containment performance, risk assessment and severe accidents. The Committee also studies the safety of the fuel cycle, conducts periodic surveys of reactor safety research programmes and operates an international mechanism for exchanging reports on nuclear power plant incidents. In implementing its programme, CSNI establishes co-operative mechanisms with NEA s Committee on Nuclear Regulatory Activities (CNRA), responsible for the activities of the Agency concerning the regulation, licensing and inspection of nuclear installations with regard to safety. It also co-operates with NEA s Committee on Radiation Protection and Public Health and NEA s Radioactive Waste Management Committee on matters of common interest. 3

4

Procedures for Initiation, Cost-sharing and Management of OECD Projects in Nuclear Safety 5

Procedures for Initiation, Cost-sharing and Management of OECD Projects in Nuclear Safety Introduction The objective of this procedure is to provide a common basis for the establishment and management of the OECD projects in the area of nuclear safety. It is a follow-up of a recommendation expressed by the CSNI Bureau during its meeting in October 2001, where the procedures for the establishment and management of the OECD (CSNI) projects in nuclear safety were addressed. While this procedure attempts at defining general guidelines for project initiation, financing and management, one should bear in mind that each project has its own motivation, background and framework. Thus, some degree of flexibility in project s structure, finances and management should be considered in order to accommodate requirements and boundary conditions that might differ from case to case. Flexibility might include consideration of in-kind contributions when applicable for project furtherance. This proposal is primarily concerned with projects that are organised by the NEA secretariat upon CSNI recommendations and initiative. The OECD (CSNI) projects aim to produce results relevant for the safe operation of nuclear power plants through international collaborative projects. In general, the projects consist of advanced experimental programmes that are conducted at specialised facilities. At present, the following OECD (CSNI) projects are in operation: - The Halden Project, covering fuel/materials and I&C/Human Factors issues - The Cabri Project, addressing reactivity transients on high burnup fuels - The MASCA Project, which deals with in-vessel corium phenomena - The OLHF Project, dealing with lower head failure mechanisms - The SETH Project addressing thermal-hydraulics issues, started in 2001 - The MCCI Project on ex-vessel coolability and melt-concrete interaction There are significant differences among these projects in terms of their motivation, size and scope. The Halden Project and the Cabri Water Loop Project are large undertakings where the host organisations assume full and direct responsibility for the project establishment and administration - as well as for the negotiation with relevant parties on the terms of participation. In the other cases, instead, the NEA secretariat has a more direct responsibility, conferred by the CSNI, in establishing the project technical and financial basis, as well as for its implementation and administration. 6

One should also notice that the NEA Nuclear Safety Division has for some time operated a database on common cause events denominated ICDE. Two additional databases, one on fire events (FIRE database) and one on piping failure (OPDE database) have started in 2002. They are smaller projects, which do not have a host country. These procedures apply also to these projects, with the exception that, for the latter ones, costs are equally shared among participants. Project Initiation The process to establish a new OECD (CSNI) project can start upon recommendations of the CSNI or by proposal of one or more Member countries. Where appropriate, a new project proposal should be reviewed by the relevant working group (WG), special experts groups (SEG), programme review group (PRG) and the Bureau prior to seeking CSNI approval. The extension of an existing project over a new time period is determined by the initiative and consensus of the project s participants. After preparatory meetings aimed to achieve a consensus among the intended participants on the technical programme, an international Agreement is prepared by the OECD-NEA containing the management and legal provisions for the sound operation of the project. The Agreement also contains the time schedule and the technical and financial frame of the intended project. Agreements on new projects are firstly circulated in draft form for comments and confirmation of interest in the Member countries. Subsequently, the final document is circulated to participants for signature. Project Signatories The Signatory organisations are those entitled to sign the project's Agreement and to be represented in the project's steering bodies. They have also the responsibility of allocating the agreed share of funds (and in-kind contributions when applicable) for the execution of the project. A Signatory may share the technical and financial participation with other organisations operating in its country. For some projects, it is now common practice that a country participation is supported by various parties, either separately or constituted under the leadership of the Signatory organisation. It is common practice that a country is represented by a single Signatory for the purpose of the execution of the Agreement. Notwithstanding this, reasons of pragmatism may lead to have more than one Signatory from one country in some cases. Project's rules shall provide for how such cases are dealt with as related to the operation of the project and of its steering bodies. Organisations for which specific rules must apply or institutions representing a non-oecd country may enter an OECD (CSNI) project as a non-signatory Associated Party. Regardless as to whether the project Agreement contains provisions for this or not, the participation of an Associated Party in the project shall be approved by the project s Management Board or Steering Committee. 7

In OECD (CSNI) projects, a direct relation exists between a participating country and a related Signatory, especially for what concerns the Signatory s right to represent other parties or to communicate results to other organisations within its national territory. In this context, the increasing trend towards internationalisation requires attention, particularly in consideration that a project participant might have obligations on communication of information to associates or companies abroad. A situation of this type must be dealt with pragmatically and on a case-by-case basis. In general one should consider that - A project participant may be allowed to communicate results to an organisation in another participating country, provided that no objections arise from the Signatory of that country. - Communication of results to organisations in countries not participating in the project must be authorised by the Management Board (or Steering Committee). Cost-sharing The project participants contribute to the cost for the execution of the programme to an agreed share set forth in the Agreement. The cost to participants can be in the form of cash contributions and - where agreed upon - as in-kind contributions, provided that the latter ones decrease the overall cost of the project and bring significant technical value into the programme. Subject to the approval of the project Management Board, a small fee is charged to cover secretariat expenses, contributing also to a small fund necessary to establish future projects. The host country normally covers a relatively large fraction of the overall cost. While in principle a proposal may entail those financial conditions that the host organisation deems most appropriate, these should be firstly agreed upon in consultation with the NEA For new projects where the secretariat is requested by the CSNI to promote and establish the project, the financial basis will be proposed by the host country in consultation with the NEA secretariat. However, the following general guidelines are recommended: - A host country contribution of 50% - A non-host country cost sharing based on GNP, but with a minimum of the order of 1% and a maximum of approximately 10% of the total project. Other factors may also be considered. Project Management Control of the project shall be vested in a Management Board constituted according to the provisions set forth in the Agreement. The Management Board (sometimes called Steering 8

Committee) shall in particular - Approve each year the annual programme of work and budget - Approve each year the financial report covering the previous year - Make such rules of procedures, consistent with the objectives and provisions of the Agreement, as they may be required for the sound management of the project - Consider any matter brought before it by the technical advisory group, by the Operating Agent or by any Signatory. A technical advisory group is normally constituted to provide the technical guidance and assessment of the project as it develops, acting as technical advisor to the Management Board. This group shall in particular - Provide technical recommendations to the Operating Agent concerning the carrying out of the programme - Review the technical progress and reports of the project, assess the results and provide guidance for future work - Advise the Management Board concerning the annual programme of work The Management Board meets at least once a year, while the advisory group meets as it deems necessary (typically twice a year). The respective chairpersons shall be elected each year among the members of the respective bodies. They can be re-elected. It is common practice, however, that the host country does not hold the chair of both steering bodies and it is advisable, although not a rule, that the chairperson changes after a period of time of maximum three years. Experience shows that the Management Board and the advisory group can operate by consensus in a rather efficient manner. The role of the chairperson is very important for seeking and establishing such consensus. Notwithstanding this, the Agreement shall provide for voting rules. As a general guideline one should consider the following: - The host country signatory shall have three votes - Each other signatory contributing more than 5% of the total cost shall have right to two votes - All other signatories shall have right to one vote With the exception of larger projects, the advisory group and the Management Board may be merged into one steering body. This is done, for instance, in the database projects. In some instances it may be advantageous to allow non-voting associate members to join the project. Associate members would be charged a fee to join the project and will have access to the project results as determined by the Management Board. Funds provided by associate members would be used to expand the scope of the project as agreed by the Management Board. 9