CLIENT UPDATE U.S. GOVERNMENT IMPOSES NEW SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN

Similar documents
US sanctions against Iran

313. What is the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (IFCA)?

A. 1. What is Implementation Day? When does the lifting of sanctions under the JCPOA go into effect?

U.S. SUSPENDS NUCLEAR-RELATED SECONDARY SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN

Opportunities While Meeting Strict,

Additional U.S. Sanctions with Respect to Iran Signed Into Law on January 2, 2013

General Questions What is the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (IFCA)?

EXECUTIVE ORDER REIMPOSING CERTAIN SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO IRAN. By the authority vested in me as President by the

GUIDANCE RELATING TO THE LIFTING OF CERTAIN U.S. SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO THE JOINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ACTION ON IMPLEMENTATION DAY

US Sanctions on Iran: 2012 Year in Review

EXECUTIVE ORDER RE-IMPOSES U.S. SECONDARY SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN

ANNEX ANNEX. to the COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /...

Annex II Sanctions-related commitments

Issued on May 8, 2018 Updated on June 27, 2018

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

United States Withdraws from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran

FREEHILL HOGAN& MAHAR LLP

Additional U.S. Sanctions with Respect to Iran Signed Into Law on August 10, 2012: The Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012.

Publication of Guidance Relating to the Provision of Certain Temporary Sanctions Relief,

Doing business in Iran EHSAN HOSSEINZADEH, ATTORNEY AT LAW & PARTNER AT EDUCATED LAWYERS LAW FIRM

UNITED STATES WITHDRAWS FROM JCPOA AND REIMPOSES SECONDARY SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN

President Trump Withdraws the United States from the Iran Nuclear Deal

Updated Russia Sanctions Bill Is Introduced to the U.S. Congress

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ( FAQs ) REGARDING ENFORCEMENT AGAINST FOREIGN PERSONS OF U.S. TRADE SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN OVERVIEW

Doing business with Iran : sanctions risks for the shipping and logistics sector

THE UNITED STATES FORMALLY REIMPOSES SECONDARY SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN

License safety-related repairs and inspections inside Iran for certain Iranian airlines.

Senate Adopts New Sanctions Targeting Russia and Iran

THE UNITED STATES LIFTS SECONDARY SANCTIONS ON IRAN AND TAKES STEPS TO IMPLEMENT CERTAIN OTHER LIMITED SANCTIONS RELIEF

How to continue doing business with Iran despite the re-imposition of US Sanctions?

Temporary Suspension of U.S. Sanctions Against Iran

US WITHDRA WAL FROM JCPOA: US SANCTIONS AND EU COUNTERMEASURES

The Changing Sanctions Landscape and Law Enforcement s Perspective

IRAN SANCTIONS UPDATE

Iran Sanctions Relief: Opportunities and Challenges for US and EU Financial Institutions

OFAC Implementation of Certain Sanctions Imposed on Two Persons by the Secretary of State

KIRKLAND ALERT. Iran Sanctions: A New Era Announced. Implementation Day Summary of Changes and Remaining Restrictions. U.S. Lifting of Sanctions

International Trade Compliance and Enforcement Bulletin

Q&A - JCPOA of 14 July 2015

The Iran Nuclear Deal: What Does It Mean for US and EU Sanctions?

United States, EU, Other Global Powers Reach Comprehensive, Long-Term Nuclear Deal with Iran

Doing Business with Iran: The EU Sanctions Regime

Selective OFAC Guideline Relating to the Lifting of Certain U.S. Sanctions Under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on Implementation Day

Despite Sanctions on Iran

U.S. Sanctions Against Russians, Ukrainian Separatists and Iran What it Means For Insurers OFAC Compliance Programs

International Trade Alert

UNITED STATES ENACTS NEW LAW REQUIRING THE IMPOSITION OF ADDITIONAL ECONOMIC SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO NORTH KOREA, IRAN AND RUSSIA

Congress Reaches Agreement on New Sanctions against Russia, North Korea, and Iran

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers. Questions Related to the NDAA (Section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012)

U.S. Economic Sanctions Iran Update March 2017

INTRODUCTION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY S OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL (OFAC) November 1, 2017

Iran sanctions client briefing. Changes to EU and US sanctions Following the Joint Plan of Action

The Implications Of Lifting Sanctions Against Sudan

Sanctions Compliance American Petroleum Institute March 27-28, 2017

U.S. Economic Sanctions

With many multi-million. Insights. Peace of mind. Negotiating the sanctions regulatory maze: Key jurisdictions to consider

Financial Sanctions Notice 26/03/2012

Same as It Ever Was: United States Re-imposes Sanctions on Iran

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is

US withdraws from Iran Nuclear Deal

GovCon OnDemand: U.S. Sanctions on Trade with Iran - Update on Restrictions Applicable to U.S. and Non-U.S. Persons

PRESIDENT TRUMP ANNOUNCES U.S. WITHDRAWAL FROM THE IRAN NUCLEAR ACCORD AND RE-IMPOSITION OF WIDE-RANGING U.S. SANCTIONS

Congress Readying Russia Sanctions: Implications for U.S. Nuclear Commerce. Aleksandar Dukic Ari Fridman June 28, 2017

AND IRAN SO FAR AWAY IRANIAN SANCTIONS LAWS & DUE DILIGENCE Presented on June 5, 2013 Piraeus Marine Club

Group Sanctions Policy

GUIDANCE NOTE UNITED STATES AND EUROPEAN UNION SANCTIONS

Sanctions Summary Matrix

September 4, The Honorable David S. Cohen Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence

IRAN SANCTIONS OVERVIEW

Practical sanctions - what are the pitfalls in claims handling. Does the lifting of sanctions relating to Iran make things easier or more complicated?

Doing Business in Iran Amid Evolving Sanctions: Leveraging New Opportunities While Ensuring Compliance

Doing Business in Iran Amid Evolving Sanctions: Leveraging New Opportunities While Ensuring Compliance

COMMENTARY. Implementation Day Triggers Significant Changes to International Sanctions Against Iran UN SANCTIONS

Implementing an Effective Sanctions and Export Compliance Program

Maritime Law Association of Singapore U.S. Embargoes and Sanctions Knowing and Navigating the Changing Field in International and Cross-Border Deals

SANCTIONS UPDATE: US SANCTIONS ON IRAN, 8 MAY 2018

Evolving U.S. Economic Sanctions and their Legal Implications Cuba, Iran, Russia and Burma

European Union Measures against Iran - Council Regulation 1263/ Frequently Asked Questions 29 January 2013

Doing Business with Iran

Implications of the EU Blocking Statute and U.S. sanctions on Iran

Credendo Client Memo Snap-back of international sanctions regime against Iran April 2017

Cross-Border Regulatory and National Security Client Alert:

ECONOMIC SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE GUIDANCE MARCH 2016

U.S. RESTRICTIONS ON OVERFLIGHTS AND AIR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES. By Lonnie Anne Pera

Russia, Iran, North Korea and Venezuela

SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Iran: U.S. Economic Sanctions and the Authority to Lift Restrictions

Expanding The Extraterritorial Reach Of US Sanctions

Client Alert: Doing Business with Iran after the US s Withdrawal from the Nuclear Deal

U.S. Government Takes Steps Toward Implementation of Sanctions on Russia

PUBLIC LAW AUG. 2, 2017

Understanding Trade Controls and Sanctions in the 2012 Global Economy

An Excerpt From: K&L Gates Global Government Solutions 2012: Annual Outlook

International Trade Practice May 18, 2004

Removal of the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations and Amendment of the Terrorism

Page 2 of 5 oligarch-related SDN companies and their subsidiaries. General License 13 authorizes transactions and activities ordinarily incident and n

The EU Blocking Regulation Issues and Considerations for the Financial Services Sector

U.S. and EU Sanctions on Iran and Russia For Le Cercle De la Compliance Beth Peters Lourdes Catrain Andrew Keller Aline Doussin.

International Trade & Regulatory ADVISORY

United States Fashion Industry Association Export Control Compliance & OFAC Sanctions

Transcription:

CLIENT UPDATE U.S. GOVERNMENT IMPOSES NEW SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN WASHINGTON DC Satish M. Kini smkini@debevoise.com NEW YORK Carl Micarelli cmicarelli@debevoise.com Eric P. Alpert epalpert@debevoise.com Liz Alspector lalspect@debevoise.com The U.S. Government continues to broaden the scope and reach of the economic and trade sanctions that it maintains against Iran. In the last month, the Obama Administration has targeted the Iranian automobile, energy, shipping, precious and other metals, and airline sectors and those entities, wherever located, that do business with those industries. On June 3, 2013, President Obama issued Executive Order 13645 (the Order ), effective on July 1, 2013, which implements provisions of the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act (the IFCPA ) and the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 ( ITRSHRA ) and potentially expands the reach of those laws. 1 The Order, which is accompanied by an interpretative set of frequently asked questions on the website of the Office of Foreign Assets Control, was issued less than one week after the U.S. Treasury Department announced measures targeting the Iranian petrochemical and aircraft industries as well as entities that aided in the Iranian government s attempts to evade U.S. sanctions. 2 1 We previously profiled ITRSHRA and the IFCPA and their respective implications; see Debevoise & Plimpton Financial Institutions Report, Expansion of U.S. Sanctions Against Iran and Syria (Oct. 2012); Debevoise Client Update, Further Expansion of U.S. Sanctions Against Iran (Jan. 2013). 2 Press Release, Treasury Announces New Sanctions Against Iran: Actions Target the Iranian Petrochemical Industry as well as the Iranian Regime s Attempts to Evade Sanctions and Support Terrorism, May 31, 2013, available at http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/pages/jl1965.aspx

These actions do not affect securities issuers reporting obligations under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act. 3 THE ORDER As explained further below, the Order authorizes the imposition of sanctions on non-u.s. financial institutions that deal in Iran s currency (the rial) and non-u.s. entities that engage in significant transactions a term that the Order does not define with the automotive sector of Iran. Additionally, the Order authorizes the blocking of the U.S. property of entities or individuals who materially aid Iranian specially designated nationals ( SDNs ), engage in certain transactions with the Iranian shipping, shipbuilding, energy, and metals sectors or engage in corruption or misappropriation related to the export of food or medicine to Iran. The Order also expands existing restrictions on dealing with the Iranian petrochemical industry. Restriction on Dealing in Rials The Order authorizes sanctions against any foreign financial institution, defined to include an institution s holding companies, affiliates, or subsidiaries, that (i) knowingly conducts or facilitates any significant transaction related to the purchase or sale of Iranian rials or a financial instrument whose value is based on the Iranian rial; or (ii) maintains significant funds or accounts outside the territory of Iran denominated in the Iranian rial. The term significant transaction is left undefined by the Order. A foreign financial institution that violates the restrictions could be prohibited from the opening of correspondent or payable-through accounts in the United States, or, if the foreign financial institution already maintains a correspondent account, could face strict conditions on or the closure of such an account. As an even more severe sanction, any property of such a foreign financial institution that is in or comes within the United States or the possession or control of a United States person could be blocked. The term United States person is defined broadly to include any entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, including any foreign branches. Thus, foreign financial institutions that become subject to such sanctions could potentially be foreclosed not only from dealing with the U.S. financial markets or with U.S. domestic banks abroad, but also from any business involving U.S. customers or counterparties. 3 We previously reported on those reporting requirements, see Debevoise Client Update, SEC Reporting Companies Must Disclose Certain Iran-Related Activities (Jan. 2013). 2

Restrictions on Engaging with the Iranian Automotive Sector The Order also targets Iran s automotive sector. In particular, the Order sanctions any person that knowingly engages in a significant transaction for the sale, supply or transfer to Iran of significant goods or services used in connection with the automotive sector of Iran. The automotive sector of Iran is defined broadly to include the manufacturing of light and heavy vehicles, including passenger cars, trucks, buses, minibuses, pick-up trucks, and motorcycles, as well as certain equipment manufacturing relating to such vehicles. Among other sanctions, persons that are sanctioned under the automotive sector restrictions could face denial of Export-Import Bank extensions of credit or guarantees, the denial of licenses to export goods or technology to the sanctioned person and the blocking of property in the United States. U.S. persons could also be prohibited from investing in or purchasing significant amounts of equity or debt instruments of a sanctioned person. Sanctions also could extend to blocking all of the sanctioned individual or entity s property in the United States or in the possession of a U.S. person, a measure that would cut off the sanctioned individual or entity from doing any business with the United States or U.S. individuals or companies, including financial institutions. In addition, the sanctions could be extended to successor entities, to persons who own or control or are under common control with entities engaged in sanctionable conduct. As a result, the sanctions potentially could have broad reach into the global automotive supply chain. Foreign financial institutions that knowingly conduct or facilitate a significant financial transaction in connection with the automotive sector of Iran could also face prohibitions on the opening of correspondent or payable-through accounts in the United States, or, if the foreign financial institution already maintains a correspondent account, could face strict conditions on or the closure of such an account. The term significant financial transaction is left undefined by the Order. Transactions Involving Iranian Persons Who Are Specially Designated Nationals The Order also authorizes blocking of property of foreign individuals or entities that engage in transactions with Iranian SDNs, or non-iranian SDNs designated as owned or controlled by the Iranian government or an Iranian financial institution, unless an exception for certain natural gas projects applies (under section 603(a) of ITRSHRA). 3

The Order also targets foreign financial institutions relations with SDNs. In particular, sanctions under the Order are triggered if a non-u.s. financial institution knowingly conducts or facilitates any significant financial transaction on behalf of any Iranian person included on the SDN List, with a few exceptions (for humanitarian and other dealings). As above, sanctioned foreign financial institutions may be prohibited from opening a correspondent or payable-through account in the United States, or, if the foreign financial institution already maintains a correspondent account, could face strict conditions on or the closure of such an account. Sanctioned foreign financial institutions may also be subject to blocking as described above. Increased Sanctions Targeting the Iranian Energy, Shipping and Shipbuilding Sectors and Precious and Other Metals Sectors The Order implements (a) IFCPA section 1244, which generally calls for the blocking of property of businesses that are in the energy, shipping, or shipbuilding sectors of Iran; that operate a port in Iran; or that knowingly provide significant support to any of them, and (b) IFCPA section 1245, which generally calls for sanctions on persons who knowingly sell, transfer, or supply certain precious, other metals, and certain other industrial materials to or from Iran. If a company is designated, it will effectively be cut off from doing business with the United States or U.S. individuals or companies, including financial institutions. Increased Sanctions Targeting Petrochemicals The Order further expands sanctions against the Iranian petrochemical industry imposed by a prior executive order, Executive Order 13622. In particular, foreign financial institutions and other persons could face sanctions not only for conducting or facilitating any significant financial transaction for the purchase or acquisition of Iranian petrochemical products, but also for significant financial transactions for the sale, transport or marketing of such products. U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT MEASURES The Order comes in the context of the continued ratcheting up of sanctions against Iran. Just prior to the release of the Order, the U.S. Treasury Department also announced a series of actions to intensify sanctions pressure on Iran. As explained in its press release, the U.S. Treasury Department targeted the Iranian petrochemical industry because it is the second largest source of revenue for the Iranian Government. The Department sanctioned eight petrochemical companies that it determined to be owned or controlled by the Iranian Government and two companies for 4

knowingly engaging in significant transactions for the purchase or acquisition of petrochemical products from Iran. The Treasury Department also imposed sanctions on Cyprus and Ukraine-based Ferland Company Limited ( Ferland ) for engaging in a scheme with the National Iranian Tanker Company ( NITC ) to deceptively sell Iranian crude oil in an attempt to avoid sanctions against Iran. NITC was previously identified by the Treasury Department as a Government of Iran entity in 2012. According to the Treasury Department, the scheme involved numerous ship-to-ship transfers of oil and culminated with Ferland s furnishing a falsified certificate of origin as part of its cargo documentation. The sanctions imposed on Ferland prohibit (1) visas for corporate officers, (2) loans from U.S. financial institutions, (3) financial transactions subject to U.S. jurisdiction, (4) transactions with respect to property and interests in property under U.S. jurisdiction, and (5) foreign exchange transactions subject to U.S. jurisdiction. In addition, the Treasury Department took steps against companies and individuals located in Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, and the U.A.E. that it believes have supported Iran Air and Mahan Air, two entities designated for sanctions pursuant to previous Executive Orders for providing material support to Iran s worldwide illicit activities. * * * The further expansion of U.S. sanctions and increased enforcement of existing U.S. sanctions evidence the Obama Administration s continued efforts to exert economic pressure on the Iranian regime. Whether based in the U.S. or elsewhere, firms should continue to bear in mind the increasingly punitive sanctions that may result from engaging in business with Iran and ensure that their compliance programs are updated accordingly. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions. June 27, 2013 5