DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/051 SWAN BIDCO/MEADOW FOODS

Similar documents
DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/047 CUBE TRANSPORTATION (ISQ)/TIP HOLDINGS

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/49 - INFRAVIA/ MP HEALTHCARE

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/041 NS NORWAY HOLDING AS (OCEANWOOD)/NORSKE SKOG AS

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/030 - AVANTCARD/TESCO BANK

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/018 - SHS/3V

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/17/047 ERPE BIDCO (CARLYLE)/PRAESIDIAD

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/039 BROOKFIELD/IMAGINE

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/008 - DAIMLER / MYTAXI

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/007 - BOYLESPORTS/JP BOOKMAKERS

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/16/023 - MURPHY/AECOM IRELAND

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/002 AVIVA/FRIENDS FIRST

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/16/045 - MONDĒLEZ/SPEEDY ASSETCO

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/15/033 - PADDY POWER/MULHOLLAND

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/084 ENDLESS LLP/AMERICAN GOLF

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/054 CEDARGLADE (MUSGRAVE) / ASSETS COMPRISING SUPERMARKET PREMISES AT FORTUNESTOWN

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/024 - LLOYDS PHARMACY/MCSWEENEY GROUP

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/16/064 - BBC & ITV/BRITBOX

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/15/022 - PADDY POWER/HACKETTS

Case M MÜLLER UK & IRELAND / DAIRY CREST DAIRY OPERATIONS

Case No IV/M Grand Metropolitan / Cinzano. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/02/1992

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/17/045

Jersey Competition Regulatory Authority ( JCRA ) Decision M255/08. Proposed Acquisition. Admiral Holdings Limited

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/038 - STARS GROUP/SKY BETTNG (CYAN BLUE)

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/16/057 UNIVERSAL INVESTMENT GMBH/LIFFEY VALLEY SHOPPING CENTRE

PROPOSED DISPOSAL OF THE DAIRIES AND PACKAGING BUSINESS AND THE RELEVANT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Company Review: First Milk. A guide to your milk buyer

Merger GuidelinesMerger Guidelines

Background to and reasons for the Proposed Transaction

ROLE OF CLEARING HOUSES AND FINANCIAL SERVICE PROVIDERS

Case No IV/M EDON / ROVA / RECO. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/08/1998

Subject to Legal Review for Accuracy, Clarity, and Consistency Subject to Language Authentication

Case No IV/M Zeneca / Vanderhave. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 09/04/1996

Jersey Competition Regulatory Authority ( JCRA ) Decision M358/09. Proposed Acquisition. Mourant & Co. (MPW) Limited

APPENDIX 2-A-1 KOREA

Glanbia plc CAGE March Siobhan Talbot Group Managing Director

PRIMETIME TRADING 6 (PTY)LTD Acquiring Firm TOURISM INVESTMENT CORPORATION LIMITED. : N Manoim (Presiding Member), Y Carrim (Tribunal Member), and

Case No IV/M BHF / CCF / CHARTERHOUSE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

Nestlé Investor Seminar 2008

Merger Control. Increasing international scrutiny? John Davies leads the global interview panel covering 27 key economies

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON DPc/iNv/2/Add i/su PP i.2 21 September 1984 TARIFFS AND TRADE

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No.: 69/LM/Sep04. Reasons for Decision

Case No IV/M CREDIT SUISSE / NIKKO / MSA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 14/08/1998

Financial Highlights - Interim Results

2.2 Basic Aspects of Distributorship Agreements under UK Law and Court Practice

Case No COMP/M MONTAGU/ GIP/ GREENSTAR. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/08/2010

United States: Merger Control

RESPONSE TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION S PUBLIC CONSULTATION: EU MERGER CONTROL DRAFT REVISION OF SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE AND MERGER IMPLEMENTING REGULATION

Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under. under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2013/C 366/04)

YouGov / CCH Survey Results

WHAT DO FINANCIAL AND RISK TOOLS MEAN FOR FARMERS?

We have a number of issues with regard to the jurisdictional application of the EU Merger Regulation to real estate transactions.

Murray Goulburn announces completion of Milk Supply Support Package review

3. In certain circumstances, intervention purchases or private storage aid may operate to remove surplus production from the market.

Case No COMP/M NEWHOUSE / JUPITER / SCUDDER / M&G / JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Glanbia plc 2016 Full Year Results Presentation

Dean Foods. May 2015

FUTURES CONTRACTS FOR MILK: HOW WILL THEY WORK? Bob Cropp 1

SACU INFLATION REPORT. February 2015

Annual Results 2017: Quality of business improved due to brand investment, international expansion, and product innovation

Half year results. Delivering better nutrition for every step of life s journey. Wednesday, 17 August Glanbia plc 2013 half year results

Case M NETTO / GROCERY STORE AT ARMITAGE AVENUE LITTLE HULTON. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M CANDOVER / CINVEN / GALA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 14/03/2003

Case No COMP/M BAYER / LYONDELL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 21/02/2000

Company Review: The Caledonian Cheese Company. A guide to your milk buyer

Consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2012

FONTERRA ANNUAL RESULTS FONTERRA CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd.

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

POSSIBLE DISCLOSEABLE TRANSACTION POSSIBLE FORMATION OF A JOINT VENTURE AND POSSIBLE PROVISION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

SACU INFLATION REPORT. March 2015

Jersey Competition Regulatory Authority ( JCRA ) Public version of. Decision M170/08 Imposing Financial Penalties

INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT. Milk Powder Manufacturing

Pre-Merger Notification Guide. BRAZIL Demarest e Almeida Advogados

Socioeconomic impact Discover what SEAT s contribution is to the economy, employment and the environment #

7611/16 MDL/io 1 DGB 1 A

A friendly and flexible approach. to the Packaging Waste Regulations

Britvic plc. Preliminary Results 2011

The Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations 2007

WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Engro Corporation. Partnership with Royal FrieslandCampina. July 2016

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE

Reasons for Decision

Case M TEVA/ALLERGAN GENERICS

By Matt Gould, Chief Market Analyst. October 1, 2018

THE SASKATCHEWAN GAZETTE, AUGUST 9, 1996 PART II AUGUST 9, 1996 REVISED REGULATIONS OF SASKATCHEWAN

HOW CAN WE DEAL WITH VOLATILITY IN THE FUTURE?

The Turkish Competition Board authorizes the acquisition of a Turkish water supplier by a multinational company (Sirma / Danone)

Case No IV/M Inchcape plc / Gestetner Holdings PLC. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 01/06/1995

2017 Full Year. Results Presentation. 21 February 2018

Balta Group NV announces the launch of its 264 million initial public offering1

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/12/027 Uniphar/CMR. Section 22 of the Competition Act 2002

Roundtable on Safe Harbours and Legal Presumptions in Competition Law - Note from Chile

Case No IV/M Swiss Bank Corporation / S.G. Warburg. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 28/06/1995

Holding the BBC to account for delivering for audiences. Procedures for setting and amending the operating licence

Glanbia plc Notice of Annual General Meeting 2013

Debt advisory. PRECISE. PROVEN. PERFORMANCE.

Case No IV/M BOREALIS / IPIC / OMV / PCD. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/07/1998

EU Commission Publishes New Regulations and Guidelines on the Application of EU Competition Law to Certain Categories of Commercial Contracts

Case M1397J. Proposed acquisition of Tenura ApS by JT (Jersey) Limited

Company strategy and performance report

ESADE COMPETITION SYMPOSIUM Opinion of 31 March 2015 on Buying Alliances in the Retail Sector

Transcription:

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/051 SWAN BIDCO/MEADOW FOODS Section 21 of the Competition Act 2002 Proposed acquisition of sole control of P+P Green Jersey Holdings Ltd by Swan Bidco Limited, a limited liability company ultimately controlled by funds advised by Exponent Private Equity LLP Dated 25 July 2018 Introduction 1. On 3 July 2018, in accordance with section 18(1)(a) of the Competition Act 2002, as amended (the Act ), the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (the Commission ) received a notification of a proposed acquisition whereby Swan Bidco Limited ( Swan ), a limited liability company ultimately controlled by funds advised by Exponent Private Equity LLP ( Exponent ), would acquire sole control of P+P Green Jersey Holdings Ltd ( the Target ) and its wholly-owned subsidiary Meadow Foods (Holdings) Limited ( Meadow Foods ) ( the Proposed Transaction ). The Proposed Transaction 2. The Proposed Transaction is to be implemented pursuant to a share purchase agreement ( SPA ), dated 2 July 2018, between Swan and the sellers of the Target 1. Pursuant to the SPA, Swan would acquire the entire issued share capital and thus sole control of the Target. 1 Funds managed by Paine Schwartz and certain members of the management team of Meadow Foods -who collectively are the legal and beneficial owners of the entire issued share capital of the Target 1

The Undertakings Involved The Acquirer Exponent 3. Exponent is a limited liability partnership established in England and Wales that makes private equity investments in businesses across a range of industry sectors. Exponent s ultimate parent company is Exponent Private Equity (Holdings) LLP. Swan is a limited liability company which was established for the purposes of the Proposed Transaction and is ultimately controlled by funds advised by Exponent. 4. Exponent currently controls the following portfolio companies which generate revenue in the State: Portfolio Company Name Business Activities In the State BBI Diagnostics Group Limited Supplier of products and services to customers in the diagnostic, healthcare, research, food 2 and cosmetics sectors Wowcher Limited Provider of online discount deals HSS Hire Group plc Tool hire business Loch Lomond Holdings Limited Producer of whisky, vodka and gin Group GTI Limited Racing Post Photobox Group Graduate recruitment business Newspaper publisher of data, opinion and analysis on racing and other sports Provider of digital consumer services for personalised products The Leisure Pass Ireland Limited Provider of sightseeing city card passes Enva Group Waste management, recycling and resource 2 The parties informed the Commission that [..]. 2

recovery business Evergreen Manufacturer and distributor of lawn and garden care products, including Evergreen, Roundup and Miracle-Gro Weedol brands SHL LTD Provider of talent assessment products and services 5. For the financial year 2016/2017, Exponent s worldwide turnover was approximately [..] 3, of which approximately [..] was generated in the State. 4 The Target 6. The Target is the ultimate holding company of Meadow Foods. It has no activities in the State, other than through Meadow Foods and its subsidiaries. Meadow Foods (and its subsidiaries ) principal activities are the collection, manufacturing, and marketing of milk and dairy products to the UK and European food manufacturing sector. Meadow Foods and its subsidiaries supply products including butters, creams, milks, cultured products, soft cheeses and sweetened products to manufacturers and foodservice customers. 7. In the State, Meadow Foods 5 supplies skimmed milk concentrate to dairy processors who manufacture skimmed milk powders. Meadow Foods 6 mainly sells to [..]. Its main customers are [..]. For the financial year ending 31 March 2017, the Target s worldwide turnover was approximately 327 million, of which approximately [..] was generated in the State. Rationale for the Proposed Transaction 3 Based on the average ECB exchange rate of 1 = 0.877, 1 = USD 1.130 4 The parties state in the notification that the figure supplied for Exponent s worldwide turnover is derived from the combined worldwide turnover of all of the portfolio companies currently controlled by Exponent for their last financial year. 5 Through its subsidiary Meadow Foods Limited. The parties state in the notification that Meadow Foods Limited is the only subsidiary of Meadow Foods which generates turnover in the State. 6 See footnote 5. 3

8. The parties state in the notification that: Exponent is a United Kingdom-based private equity firm investing in businesses across a broad range of sectors. The Proposed Transaction reflects Exponent s strategy to invest in companies in order to unlock value and drive growth in the long term. The Target is entering the next phase of its growth and believes that this will best be achieved by involving Exponent as its new financial partner. Third Party Submissions 9. No submission was received. Competitive Analysis Horizontal Overlap 10. There is no horizontal overlap between the activities of the parties in the State. As described above, none of the companies owned and/or controlled by Exponent, which generated turnover in the State, are engaged in the same business activities as Meadow Foods, i.e., none of those companies currently manufacture, or market milk and/or dairy products in the State. Similarly, Meadow Foods is not currently involved in any of the business activities in which the companies owned and/or controlled by Exponent, which generate turnover in the State, are active. 11. In light of the above, the Commission considers that the Proposed Transaction does not raise any horizontal competition concerns in the State Vertical Relationship 12. The parties informed the Commission that there is no vertical relationship between Meadow Foods and any of the companies managed and/or controlled by Exponent which generate turnover in the State. The Commission has not identified any vertical relationships between the parties. On this basis, the Commission considers that the Proposed Transaction does not raise any vertical competition concerns in the State. Ancillary Restraints 4

13. Paragraph 12 of the SPA contains restrictive covenants on the Target, in particular noncompete and non-solicitation obligations. Following engagement with the Commission, the parties decided to withdraw their request that the restrictive covenants be considered by the Commission as restrictions that are directly related to and necessary for the implementation of the Proposed Transaction. Such restrictions are therefore not addressed in this Determination. 5

Determination The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission, in accordance with section 21(2)(a) of the Competition Act 2002, as amended, has determined that, in its opinion, the result of the proposed acquisition, whereby Swan Bidco Limited, a limited liability company ultimately controlled by funds advised by Exponent Private Equity LLP, would acquire sole control of P+P Green Jersey Holdings Ltd, and its wholly-owned subsidiary Meadow Foods (Holdings) Limited, will not be to substantially lessen competition in any market for goods or services in the State, and accordingly, that the acquisition may be put into effect. For the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission Brian McHugh Member Competition and Consumer Protection Commission 6