THE HANDBOOK OF THE LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO

Similar documents
LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO

LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO

LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO

CITY OF CHICAGO LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION

LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO

Child Care Center Licensing Manual (August 2016)

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 15, 2004 Session

LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-PR-482 LARRY EWERS, APPELLANT.

RUSSELL L. HALL, CASE NO.: CVA LOWER COURT CASE NO.: CEB

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT AUGLAIZE COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CASE NO

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. APPELLATE DIVISION

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. DAVID MILLS, Appellant V. ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, LP, Appellee

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2011

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner Z Financial, LLC, appeals both the trial court s granting of equitable

CASE NO. 1D Andy Thomas, Public Defender; and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, for Appellant.

CASE NO. 1D Roy W. Jordan, Jr., of Roy W. Jordan, Jr., P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017

LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Murray State University Classification of Residency for Fee Assessment Purposes

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DOCKET NO. AP ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) This case arises out of a Forcible Entry and Detainer Action that Appellee Rowell, LLC

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2010

Regulation of Water Utility Rates and Service

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Benton and Elder Argued at Richmond, Virginia

LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO

Protest Procedure: A Primer

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Kathryn S. Pecko, Judge.

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2014-CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

TAX LITIGATION MEMORANDUM

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CASE NO

different classes of these judges. Any reference in any statute to a workmen's compensation referee shall be deemed to be a reference to a workers'

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE DECEMBER 2, 2008 Session

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. **********

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 389 WDA 2012

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2007

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA GENERAL EMPLOYEES PENSION TRUST FUND ADMINISTRATIVE RULES


CASE NO. 1D Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

CASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and J. Clifton Cox, Special Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

In re the Marriage of: CYNTHIA JEAN VAN LEEUWEN, Petitioner/Appellant, RICHARD ALLEN VAN LEEUWEN, Respondent/Appellee. No.

Robert Patel v. Meridian Health Systems Inc

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals

APPEAL PROCEDURES, RULES and REGULATIONS

Before Judges Fuentes and Gooden Brown. On appeal from the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission. Kevin T. Conway, attorney for appellant.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1672

STATE OF MICIDGAN CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE THIRTY-FIFTH JUDICIAL cmcurr SHIA WASSEE COUNTY

In the Matter of Shannon Stoneham-Gaetano and Maria Ciufo, County of Monmouth DOP Docket No (Merit System Board, decided April 24, 2001)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 92-CC SCT JAMES TRUITT PHILLIPS v. MISSISSIPPI VETERANS' HOME PURCHASE BOARD

Statutes Relevant to the Education and Licensure of Fire Sprinkler Inspectors KRS 198B (6401) (6417) Enacted 2010

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2014

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED JUL OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS. BRIEF FOR Appellant BY:

If this opinion indicates that it is FOR PUBLICATION, it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Kerry M. Wormwood v. Batching Systems, Inc., et al., No. 874, September Term, 1998 WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRANSMITTAL OF RECORD --

Court of Appeals of Ohio

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

REVISED PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE NEVADA TAX COMMISSION. LCB File No. R146-15

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

ANGELO BARRERA CASE NO.: CVA LOWER COURT CASE NO.:

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005

ARTICLE I OFFICERS AND TERMS OF OFFICE

Overview of the USPTO Appeal Process and Practice Tips

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY Abigail Aragon, District Judge

THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO : 9/14/07

Appellant, CASE NO.: CVA v. Lower Court Case No.: 2006-SC-922 FINAL ORDER AFFIRMING TRIAL COURT

CASE NO. 1D Melissa Montle and Seth E. Miller of Innocence Project of Florida, Inc., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

CASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

Subpart B Ex Parte Appeals. in both. Other parallel citations are discouraged.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

STAND-UP MRI OF ORLANDO, CASE NO.: CVA

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2008

License Denied, Suspended or Revoked and Appeals

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

CASE NO. 1D David P. Healy of Law Offices of David P. Healy, PLC, Tallahassee, for Appellants.

COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Transcription:

THE HANDBOOK OF THE LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER 50 WEST WASHINGTON STREET ROOM - CL 21 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602 (312) 744-4095 www.cityofchicago.org/lac The License Appeal Commission is the immediate forum of appeal for suspensions, revocations, and fines imposed by the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection against a liquor license holder. Additionally, the LAC deals with appeals for denied liquor license applications, denied changes in management/ownership of an existing liquor license, and refusals of liquor license renewals issued by the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection. - 1 -

FILING APPEALS OF FINES, SUSPENSIONS OR REVOCATION 1. An appeal of a decision by the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection fining, suspending or revoking a liquor license must be filed with the License Appeal Commission within TWENTY (20) days of the date of the issuance of the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection order fining, suspending or revoking the liquor license. A FAILURE TO FILE THE APPEAL WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE ORDER WILL RESULT IN THE LOSS OF YOUR ABILITY TO APPEAL THE DECISION. (Please Note: The License Appeal Commission follows the schedule of official holidays issued by the City of Chicago s Law Department). 2. In order to appeal the finding of the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, the licensee must file certain documents with the License Appeal Commission. A) The Licensee must file an original and four copies of a document of appeal (see Notice of Appeal under Documents on our website). B) Copies of the order of Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection Order of Disposition with the Findings of Fact, fining, suspending or revoking the license must be attached to the original and each of the four copies of the appeal. 3. Additionally, in order to appeal the Licensee must pay a filing fee of $125.00 with the Department of Finance. The POS Invoice form is now available on our department s website at www.cityofchicago.org/lac Download the form and pay the fee at any City of Chicago payment center. A receipt showing that the fee has been paid must be presented to the License Appeal Commission. NO APPEAL WILL BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT THIS RECEIPT. 4. The Licensee should also include any case law or statute upon which the Licensee will rely in arguing to reverse the decision of the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection. 5. Once an appeal is filed with the License Appeal Commission, the Licensee must file a Notarized Affidavit stating that the court reported transcripts from the proceedings at the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection have been ordered. The affidavit must be filed with the License Appeal Commission within TEN (10) business days. A FAILURE TO FILE THIS AFFIDAVIT WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THE APPEAL. 6. Any liquor licensee who appeals a revocation order from the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection is required by state law to pay and keep current their liquor license renewal fees during the pendency of the appeal. Any liquor licensee who appeals a revocation order to the License Appeal Commission will be required to show proof that all license renewal fees are paid to date. Liquor licensees must pay their renewal fees at the City of Chicago Department of Finance in Room 107 of City Hall and obtain a receipt. The paid license renewal fee receipt, as well as a receipt showing payment of the filing fee for a new appeal, must be submitted to the License Appeal Commission as a prerequisite to filing an appeal. - 2 -

FILING APPEALS ON APPLICANT CASES 1. An appeal of a denial of an application for a liquor license (includes any of the following: denial of an application for a new license, change of officers, change of location, change of management/ownership or a refusal to renew) must be filed with the License Appeal Commission within TWENTY (20) days of the date of the letter of denial issued by the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection. A FAILURE TO FILE THE APPEAL WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE LETTER OF DENIAL WILL RESULT IN THE LOSS OF YOUR ABILITY TO APPEAL THE DENIAL. (Please Note: The License Appeal Commission follows the schedule of official holidays issued by the City of Chicago s Law Department). 2. In order to appeal the denial by the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection of an application for a liquor license, the applicant must file certain documents with the License Appeal Commission. A) The applicant must file an original and four copies of a document of appeal. B) Copies of the letter of denial of the application for a liquor license issued by the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection must be attached to the original and to each of the four copies of the appeal. 3. Additionally, in order to appeal the Applicant must pay a filing fee of $125.00 with the Department of Finance. The POS Invoice form is now available on our department s website at www.cityofchicago.org/lac Download the form and pay the fee at any City of Chicago payment center. A receipt showing that the fee has been paid must be presented to the License Appeal Commission. NO APPEAL WILL BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT THIS RECEIPT. 4. The Applicant should also include any case law or statute upon which the applicant will rely in arguing to Reverse the decision of the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection. 5. Any liquor licensee who appeals a refusal to renew order from the Local Liquor Control Commission is required by state law to pay and keep current their liquor license renewal fees during the pendency of the appeal. Any liquor licensee who appeals a refusal to renew order with the License Appeal Commission will be required to show proof that all license renewal fees are paid to date. Liquor licensees must pay their renewal fees at the City of Chicago Department of Finance in Room 107 of City Hall and obtain a receipt. The paid license renewal fee receipt, as well as a receipt showing payment of the filing fee for a new appeal, must be submitted to the License Appeal Commission as a prerequisite to filing an appeal. - 3 -

THE PROCESS Upon the filing of the appeal, it will be given a case number. The appeal will then be given its first court date. At approximately three week intervals the License Appeal Commission meets at 11:00 a.m. (or a time designated by the License Appeal Commission) in courtroom LL 02 on the lower level of the Daley Center (50 W. Washington) for what is referred to as the General Call. Upon the filing of the appeal, the case will be assigned to one of the General Call dates. At the General Call, cases will be called according to their case numbers with the oldest case numbers being called first. All corporations must be represented by a licensed attorney. Those licensees who do not hold their license in a corporate entity may represent themselves before the License Appeal Commission. However, we strongly recommend for the appellant s own benefit that they seek legal counsel and representation. The Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection is always represented, at our hearings, by attorneys for the City called Assistant Corporation Counsel. If the appealing party is represented by counsel they do not need to personally appear for the General Call but are always welcome if they wish to come and observe. The attorney representing you must, however, appear at the General Call. When an applicant case is called at the General Call, mutual discovery can be requested and your case will be set for a hearing on the merits of your appeal. Continuances in Applicant cases will be granted for good cause at the discretion of the Commissioners. For appeals of Fines, Suspensions or Revocations, the transcript of the hearing at the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection must be filed with the License Appeal Commission in a timely fashion. Once an appeal is filed with the License Appeal Commission, the Licensee must file a Notarized Affidavit stating that the court reported transcripts from the proceedings at the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection have been ordered. The affidavit must be filed with the License Appeal Commission within TEN (10) business days. A FAILURE TO FILE THIS AFFIDAVIT WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THE APPEAL. Further, a failure to provide the actual transcripts in a timely fashion may be grounds for a dismissal of an appeal. Once the full transcript(s) of the Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection s hearing is filed we will set the appeal for a hearing on the merits. Continuances in Fines, Suspensions or Revocation cases will be granted for good cause only at the discretion of the Commissioners. - 4 -

HEARINGS At hearings for Fine, Suspension or Revocation appeals, arguments are presented to the License Appeal Commission by the parties based entirely on the transcripts and record below and on relevant city code, statute or case law. The party that has filed the appeal is the Appellant and the party responding to the appeal is the Appellee. The Appellant has the burden of proof and argues first, followed by the Appellee and then by a brief rebuttal by the Appellant. After argument, the three Commissioners that make up the License Appeal Commission will take the matter under consideration. After deliberation, the Commissioners will issue a written order deciding the case, which will be mailed to the parties of the appeal. Either party wishing to continue to pursue their appeal after losing at the License Appeal Commission must file with the License Appeal Commission a Petition for Rehearing. A Petition for Rehearing must be filed within TWENTY (20) DAYS, from the date of the License Appeal Commission s order and must submit an original and four copies of the Petition for Rehearing. If the Petition for Rehearing is denied, an appeal of the License Appeal Commission s order can be taken to the Circuit Court of Cook County within THIRTY-FIVE (35) days and by their rule. Hearings for applicant cases are considered a trial de novo. Both sides are entitled to call witnesses and present evidence for consideration. The basic rules of evidence and case law apply at the hearing. The party that has filed the appeal is the Appellant and the party responding to the appeal is the Appellee. The Appellee has the burden of proof and presents their case first followed by the appellant. After both sides rest on the evidence argument is allowed. After argument, the three Commissioners take the matter under advisement. Subsequently, a written order deciding the case will be mailed to the parties of the appeal. Either party wishing to continue to pursue their appeal after losing at the License Appeal Commission must file with the License Appeal Commission a Petition for Rehearing. A Petition for Rehearing must be filed within TWENTY (20) DAYS, from the date of the License Appeal Commission s order and must submit an original and four copies of the Petition for Rehearing. If the Petition for Rehearing is denied, an appeal of the License Appeal Commission s order can be taken to the Circuit Court of Cook County within THIRTY-FIVE (35) days and by their rule. - 5 -

MOTION TO VACATE AN ORDER DISMISSING AN APPEAL If your appeal is Dismissed and you wish to reinstate the appeal you must do the following: 1. File a motion explaining why the dismissal order should be vacated. The motion must be filed within THIRTY (30) days of the order dismissing the appeal. 2. Present a receipt from the City of Chicago Department of Finance showing the $50.00 filing fee has been paid. The POS Invoice form is now available on our department s website at www.cityofchicago.org/lac Download the form and pay the fee at any City of Chicago payment center. If any party has any further questions relating to the License Appeal Commission, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (312) 744-4095. Dennis Michel Fleming, Chairman License Appeal Commission - 6 -