Stephen P. St. Cyr & Associates 17 Sky Oaks Drive

Similar documents
STEPHEN P. ST. CYR & Assoc.

STEPHEN P. ST. CYR & Assoc. Financial Statement Preparation 17 Sky Oaks Drive, Biddeford, ME ~ Planning

ow State of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Application of Abenaki Water Company For Approval of a Rate Adjustment

on September 7, 201 7, Hampstead Area Water Company (Hampstead or HAWC) filed

F-1 BALANCE SHEET Assets and Other Debits

DW and DW LAKES REGION WATER COMPANY, INC. PERMANENT RATES REVENUE REQUIREMENT. Rate Base (Schedule 2) $ 2,373,682

Rate Base (Schedule 3) $ 488,114. Rate of Return (Schedule 4) 6.74% 7.78% Operating Income Required $ 32,920

NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANIEL T. NAWAZELSKI LEAD-LAG STUDY EXHIBIT DTN-1. New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Jeffrey L.

KEEGAN WERLIN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 265 FRANKLIN STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS March 17, 2014

Lakes Region Water Company SPS 1-1

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

EXETER ASSOCIATES, INC Little Patuxent Parkway Suite 300 Columbia, Maryland 21044

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A.

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID L. CHONG

Centerville-Osterville-Marstons Mills Water Department Water Rate Review

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DW LAKES REGION WATER CO., INC. Petition for Change in Rates and for Related Approvals

Lakes Region Water Company

GREAT OAKS WATER COMPANY

POLK-BURNETT ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE AND SUBSIDIARIES CENTURIA, WI CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2017 and 2016

UNITIL ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC NEW HAMPSHIRE FILING REQUIREMENT SCHEDULES TABLE OF CONTENTS


THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF LAURENCE M. BROCK

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN (WORKING CASH) APRIL 6, 2018

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

ANNUAL REPORT WATER, ELECTRIC, OR JOINT UTILITY TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN

this twelfth day of April, 2013, by and among the Staff of the Public Utilities Commission (Staff)

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JACK S. LEWIS ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

City and Borough of Juneau, AK WATER UTILITY AND WASTEWATER UTILITY RATE STUDY

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Attachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn

REVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JACK S. LEWIS ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION UNITED WATER PENNSYLVANIA, INC. Docket No. R Direct Testimony. Lisa A. Boyd

Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS. A. My name is Suzanne E. Sieferman, and my business address is 1000 East Main

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PENNICHUCK EAST UTILITY, INC. OW :13426

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND 2004 CASS RURAL WATER USERS DISTRICT

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TYSON D. PORTER REGULATORY ANALYST.

2 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN P. DAIS (WORKING CASH) October 6, 2017 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

REqUEST: Re: CoBank s patronage refunds. Please provide a history of patronage refunds over the last five years.

Bedford Waste Services Corporation TARIFF {I) 0 1 FOR SEWAGE COLLECTION AND TRANSMISSION A PORTION OF THE TOWN OF BEDFORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE

GREAT OAKS WATER COMPANY

REPORT ON AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016

Docket No Twenty-First Set of Data Requests of the Division of Public Utilities and Carriers to National Grid February 2, 2018

GALVESTON COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 12 GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

Fountain Valley Authority (A Component Unit of the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado)

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. DW Temporary and Permanent Rate Case

Florida ABLE, Inc. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. June 30, 2016

Docket No Twenty-First Set of Data Requests of the Division of Public Utilities and Carriers to National Grid February 2, 2018

Public Hearing January 18, 2017

LiftFund (CDC) 504 Checklist and Loan Application

DISTRICT 7 FIRE AND RESCUE (A NONPROFIT FIRE DEPARTMENT) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011

WATER USER RATES & FEE STUDY

GREATER OUACHITA WATER COMPANY MONROE, LOUISIANA AUGUST 31, 2017

The TXU Electric Delivery mortgage restricts its payment of dividends to the amount of its retained earnings.

San Antonio Water System

Park Center Community Development Authority. Agenda for February 20, 2013 Meeting

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. TDD Access: Relay NH Martin P. Honigberg

TOWN OF TEMPLETON, MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT Financial Statements June 30, 2016 and 2015

Report of Independent Auditors and Consolidated Financial Statements for. Alaska Power & Telephone Company and Subsidiaries

MID-CAROLINA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. LEXINGTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

DISTRICT 7 FIRE AND RESCUE (A NONPROFIT FIRE DEPARTMENT) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. R PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No.

TOGA CAPITAL LTD FORM 10-Q. (Quarterly Report) Filed 08/14/15 for the Period Ending 06/30/15

ABERDEEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FINANCIAL REPORT. Year Ended September 30, 2012

FORT COLLINS- LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT

Regulatory Authority Competences in Monitoring the Bookkeeping of the Regulated Companies. Robin Kliethermes Rachel Lewis

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PAUL M. NORMAND

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, INC.

Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0079

YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 1 ) Unitil Corporation ("Unitil") and Northern utilities, Inc. ("Northern") ("Joint

EQUUS TOTAL RETURN, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

WATER, ELECTRIC, OR JOINT UTILITY ANNUAL REPORT

The Potomac Edison Company and Subsidiaries. Quarterly Financial Information. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C. Second Revised Sheet No.: 22 ISSUED: Canceling First Revised Sheet No.: 22 ISSUED BY: Jim Berkau

GILLARD, BAUER, MAZRUM, FLORIP, SMIGELSKI & GULDEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 109 E. CHISHOLM STREET ALPENA, MICHIGAN May 12, 2015

Memorandum. Background. March 1, 2018

CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS. WATER FUND (An Enterprise Fund of the City of Springfield, Illinois)

August 15, One copy of Eversource s Form F-1 was filed electronically with the NHPUC, and the second copy is included with this filing letter.

Consolidation of the Warm Beach Water System

WATER, ELECTRIC, OR JOINT UTILITY ANNUAL REPORT

SIXTY SIXTY CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. Financial Statements. For the year ended December 31, 2014

BANDERA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. BANDERA, TEXAS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH ACCOMPANYING INFORMATION FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011

ATKINSON YOUTH SERVICES, INC. (A California Nonprofit Corporation) Audited Financial Statements. For The Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS. DOUG LITTLE, Chairman BOB STUMP BOB BURNS TOM FORESE ANDY TOBIN

& CWA AUTHORITY, INC. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT

RAYBURN COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. ROCKWALL, TEXAS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT

CH ENERGY GROUP, INC. & CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT. for the period ended

NEW ENGLAND SERVICE COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Total Operating Revenues $ 7,042,027 $ 6,855,633

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Docket No. DE DIRECT TESTIMONY

Florida ABLE, Inc. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. June 30, 2018

One copy of Eversource s Form F-1 was filed electronically with the NHPUC, and the second copy is included with this filing letter.

MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period

September. Tacoma Water FINANCIAL REPORT

HARRIS COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT NO.

Transcription:

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Sky Oaks Drive Biddeford, Me. 000 0--01 Direct Testimony of Stephen P. St. Cyr in DW 1- Q. Please state your name and address. A. Stephen P. St. Cyr of, 1 Sky Oaks Drive, Biddeford, Me. 000. Q. Please state your present employment position and summarize your professional and educational background. A. I am presently employed by St. Cyr & Associates, which provides accounting, tax, management and regulatory services. The Company devotes a significant portion of the practice to serving utilities. The Company has a number of regulated water utilities among its clientele. I have prepared and presented a number of rate case filings before the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission. Prior to establishing St. Cyr & Associates, I worked in the utility industry for 1 years, holding various managerial accounting and regulatory positions. I have a Business Administration degree with a concentration in accounting from Northeastern University in Boston, Ma. I obtained my CPA certificate in Maryland. Q. Is St. Cyr & Associates presently providing services to West Swanzey Water Company ( Company )? A. Yes. St. Cyr & Associates prepared the various exhibits and supporting schedules and prepared the written testimony and other rate case filing requirements. In addition, St. Cyr & Associates assists the Company in preparing its year end financial statements, prepares the tax returns and prepares the PUC Annual Report. Q. Are you familiar with the pending rate application of the Company and with the various exhibits submitted as Schedules 1 through inclusive, with related pages and attachments? A. Yes, I am. The exhibits were prepared by me, utilizing the financial records of the Company. Q. What is the test year that the Company is using in this filing? A. The Company is utilizing the twelve months ended December 1, 01. 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Sky Oaks Drive Biddeford, Me. 000 0--01 Q. Before you explain the schedules, please provide a brief overview of the Company. A. The Company was formed in 1 and became a utility in 1. It has three wells, pump stations,,00 feet of mains, non-fire services, fire services and meters. At December 1, 01 the Company served customers. In recent years its investment in plant has been minimal. The Company has no plans to replace and/or add plant. Its long term debt continues to decline. The Company s operating and maintenance expenses have increased significantly in 01 due primarily to change in operators. In 01 its net loss was $0,. The 01 net loss was due to a decline in revenues and increase in operation and maintenance and property taxes. With the proposed increase in rates and revenues, the Company should be able to eliminate the net loss and continue to provide service to its customers at fair and reasonable rates. Q. Is there anything else prior to summarizing the schedules? A. No. Q. Would you please summarize the schedules? A. Yes. The schedule entitled Computation of Revenue Deficiency for the Test Year ended December 1, 01, summarizes the supporting schedules. The actual revenue deficiency for the Company for the test year amounts to $1,. It is based upon an actual test year with a quarter average rate base of $, as summarized in Schedule. The Company s actual rate of return is.0% for the actual test year. The rate of return of.0%, when multiplied by the rate base of $,, results in an operating income requirement of $1,. As shown on Schedule 1, the actual net operating income (loss) for the Company for the test year was ($1,). The operating income required, less the net operating income (loss), results in an operating income deficiency before taxes of $1,. The Company did not calculate the tax effect of the revenue deficiency, resulting in a revenue deficiency for the Company of $1,. The proforma revenue deficiency for the Company for the test year amounts to zero. It is based upon a proformed test year rate base of $,1, as summarized in Schedule. The Company is utilizing a proformed rate of return of.0% for the proformed test year. The proformed rate of return of.0% when multiplied by the rate base of $,1, results in an operating net income requirement of $1,.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Sky Oaks Drive Biddeford, Me. 000 0--01 As shown on Schedule 1, the proformed net operating income for the Company for the test year was $1,. The operating income required, less the net operating income, results in a deficiency of zero. The tax effect of the deficiency is zero, resulting in a revenue deficiency for the Company of zero. Please note that the Company has made minimal adjustments to rate base and no adjustments to the rate of return. Q. Would you please explain Schedule 1 and supporting Schedule 1A 1C? A. Schedule 1 reflects the Company s Statement of Income. Column b shows the actual 01 year end balances for the Company (as reported to the PUC in its 01 PUC Annual Report). Column c shows the proforma adjustments for known and measurable changes to test year revenues and expenses. The proforma adjustments are further supported by schedule 1A, 1B and 1C. Column d shows the proforma 01 year end balance. Column e and Column f are actual results for 01 and 01, respectively. During the twelve months ended December 1, 01, the actual operating revenues amounted to $,0, a decrease of $,0 over 01. The decrease is due to no longer being able to charge customers a surcharge for previously unbilled revenue and less water being sold. At December 1, 01 the Company had customers. Its customers consumed, thousand gallons of water, a decrease of thousand gallons of water compared to 01. The Company s total operating expenses amounted to $,1, an increase of $1,00 over 01. The significant increase in total operating expenses was due to the change in operators and the resulting increase in operating and maintenance expenses and the increase in property taxes. The 01 Net Operating Income (Loss) amounted to ($1,). Net Income (Loss) for 01 was ($0,). The Company made 1 proforma adjustment to operating revenues totaling $, and a number of proforma adjustments to operating expenses totaling $,1. The specific proforma adjustments are identified on the Statement of Income Proforma Adjustments (Schedule 1A). A brief explanation is as follows: Proforma Adjustment to Revenues Sales of Water Amount Necessary to Earn Return and Cover Operating Costs - $,

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Sky Oaks Drive Biddeford, Me. 000 0--01 The Company has increased test revenues for the proposed amount of revenues necessary to cover its expenses and allow it to earn its proposed rate of return. Proforma Adjustments to Expense Operating Expenses: The Company pays its owner / manager for meter reading ($00), customer records and collection ($,00) and miscellaneous customer matter ($00) as well as oversight of the operations and maintenance of the system including oversight of the operator and general and administrative matters ($,000). The Company proposes to increase the pay to its owner / manager for meter reading ($00), customer records and collection ($,00) and miscellaneous customer matter ($00) as well as oversight of the operations and maintenance of the system including oversight of the operator and general and administrative matters ($,00). The last increase was 0 coming out of the last rate case. Overall, it represents approximately % per year for years. During 01, the Company replaced Gordon Water LLC ( Gordon ) with Everett E. Houghton Co., Inc. ( Houghton ) as operator. As such, it eliminated Gordon s costs of $00 for January March 01. The Company also added Houghton costs of $,1 for January March 01. In anticipation of a PUC audit, the Company estimated that it will incur $,00. No such audit expenses are reflected in the test year. The Company is proposing to recover the proposed audit expense of $,00 over years, resulting in a test year adjustment of $00. During 01, the Company incurred $, of additions to plant and record a half year of depreciation expense of $0 on such additions to plant. The Company is making a proforma adjustment for the additional half year depreciation of $0. During 01, the Company incurred $1, and $, in state and local property taxes. At this point, the Company is unaware of any increase or decrease in property taxes. As such, the Company has not made any proforma adjustments. However, it preserves the right to increase and / or decrease property taxes for any known and measurable change likely to be known later this year.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Sky Oaks Drive Biddeford, Me. 000 0--01 With the proposed increase in revenue offset by the proposed increase in expenses, there is also a related increase in the federal income and state business taxes. The increase in federal income taxes represents the additional tax liability due to the increase in taxable income. The increase in state business taxes represents the additional tax liability due to the increase in gross profits. The Company has provided the calculation of the federal income taxes and the state business taxes (Schedule 1B). The Company has also provided the effective tax factor (Schedule 1C). The total proforma adjustments to Operating Expenses amount to $,1. The net of the proforma adjustments to operating revenue of $, and the proforma adjustments to operating expenses of $,1 results in a net proforma adjustment of $1,. When the net operating income associated with the proforma adjustments is added to net operating income from the test year, the proforma test year net operating income totals $1,. The proforma test year net operating income of $1, allows the Company to cover its expenses and earn a.0% return on its investments. Q. Does that complete your description of the proforma adjustments to revenues and expenses? A. Yes. Q. Please describe Schedule, the Balance Sheet. A. The Company has $, total assets at the end of 01. $,1 of the $, total assets is net plant, of which is completed and providing service to customers. The Company has $0, of total equity capital. The Company incurred a significant loss in 01, which reduced retained earning and total equity. The Company has $1, of long term debt. The long term debt balance has decreased due to payment of principal on the three outstanding loans. Accounts payable has increased during the test year due to the significant 01 net loss and the resulting strained cash flow. At 1/1/1, the Company owed its owner / manager $0,0, its operator $, and its water supplier $,01. A portion of the plant has been contributed.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Sky Oaks Drive Biddeford, Me. 000 0--01 Q. Please continue with an explanation of Schedule, Rate Base and the supporting schedule. A. Schedule reflects the Company s Rate Base for both the quarter average and the proforma year end balance. Column b f shows the actual balance at the end of the period. Column g shows the average of the quarter balances. Column h shows the proforma adjustments. Column i shows the proforma year end balance. Schedule A, Prepayments shows the monthly balances for prepaid insurance and property taxes and identifies the sum of the balances at the end of each quarter. Schedule B shows proforma adjustments to rate base: one, the additional half year accumulated depreciation on the 01 additions to plant; and, two, the additional cash working capital due to the proposed increase in O&M expenses. The cash working capital balances are further supported by Schedules C. The Total Proforma quarter average Rate Base balance amounts to $,1. Q. Would you please explain Schedule, Rate of Return Information? A. Schedule reflects the overall rate of return for both the proforma test year and the actual test year. The weighted average rate of return for the actual test year is.0%. It was developed by taking the actual component ratios times the actual component cost rates to determine the actual weighted average cost rate. The sum of the actual cost rates for equity and debt equals actual weighted average rate of return. The Company made no adjustments to the actual rate of return. As such, the weighted average rate of return for the proforma test year is.0%. Schedule also reflects both the capital structure and the capital ratios. The Company has provided the capital structure for the actual test year and the proforma test year. It has also provided the actual capital structure for 01 and 01. Please note that the Company s debt to equity ratio has remained relatively constant. In addition, Schedule reflects the long term debt, interest expense, financing costs, total debt costs and debt costs rates for the actual test year. At 1/1/1 the Company has $1, of outstanding long term debt. Its 01 total interest expense is $,. The 01 actual cost of debt was.%. There was no change to the long term debt, interest expense and financing costs for the proforma test year.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Sky Oaks Drive Biddeford, Me. 000 0--01 Q. Please explain the Report of Proposed Rate Changes. A. If the Company filing is approved as submitted, its total water Operating Revenues will amount to $,. Q. Is the Company proposing any changes to the methodology used in calculating the rates? A. No. The Company is generally using the same methodology. It is applying the rate increase to both general and fire protection customers. Q. When is the Company proposing that the new rates be effective? A. The proposed effective date is August 1, 01 so that the Company can begin to bill the new rates the first week of October 01 for the third quarter of 01. Q. Is there anything else that the Company would like to address? A. Yes. The most recent Sanitary Survey dated //1 provided the Company with a few recommendations. Among them were recommendations pertaining to the installation of VFDs on the well pumps and installation of a SCADA system. The Company asked Houghton to provide an estimate of such work. He estimates that the work would costs $,000. The Company has completed the pre-application form to borrow $,00 ($,000 plus % construction cost contingency of $,00) from NHDES s DWSRF. If the NHDES approves the project, the Company will seek PUC approval of the financing. The Company anticipates a September 0, 01 start date with an anticipated completion date of November 0, 01. The Company s ability to pay the principal and interest on the loan is contingent on PUC approval of the related step increase. Q. Has the Company prepared Step Increase schedules? If so, please describe. A. Yes. The proposed additional revenue requirement associated with the pump drives and SCADA is $,. It is derived from a net addition to rate base of $,0. The return on the additional plant at.% is $. The additional operating expenses are $,. The sum of the return of $ and the additional operating expenses of $, results in an additional revenue requirement of $,. Please see Page 1 of of the Step Increase schedule.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Sky Oaks Drive Biddeford, Me. 000 0--01 Page of shows how the annual cost rate of.% was derived. Page of shows the costs of the plant and the related depreciation. Page of shows the additional state and local property taxes and combined federal income and state business tax effect. Page of shows the effective tax factor. Q. Is there anything else that the Company would like to address? A. Yes. The Company has decided not to pursue temporary rates due to the additional costs and additional time to pursue the rate change. The Company respectfully requests that the Commission take that into consideration when establishing the effective date of the new rates. Q. Is there any other rate matter that you would like to discuss? A. Yes. The Company has engaged the services of to prepare the rate filing and pursue the rate increase throughout the rate case proceeding. St. Cyr & Associates and the Company have agreed on a per hour fee of $1.00 for each hour of work performed. The Company and I believe that the fees are fair and reasonable. At this point, the Company does not anticipate utilizing outside legal council. Q. Would you please summarize what the Company is requesting in its rate filing? A. The Company respectfully requests that the Commissioners approve an increase in annual revenues of $, for permanent rates. Also, assuming NHDES approves the Company requests for DWSRF loan, the Company respectfully requests that the PUC approve the Company requests for DWSRF loan and the related step increase of $,. Q. Is there anything further that you would like to discuss? A. No, there is nothing further. Q. Does this conclude your testimony? A. Yes. SPSt. Cyr 0/1/1