COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES PROVIDER S REPRESENTATIVE Denise DiPietro ORDER

Similar documents
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Kuntz v. Beltrami Entr Inc

Child Care Center Licensing Manual (August 2016)

County of Adams Rules of the Board of Assessment Appeals Adopted August 22, 2012

DRAFT FINAL FORM REGULATION DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE # (IRRC #2750) AMENDED REPORT-CORPORATION TAXES

No. 95-TX Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. (Hon. Wendell Gardner, Trial Judge)

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION

2016 PA Super 262. Appellant No MDA 2015

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

NOTICE OF CIVIL VIOLATION AND ORDER

ABPS APPEALS POLICY A. CATEGORIES OF COMPLAINTS 1. PREREQUISITE / REQUISITE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

APPEAL PROCEDURES, RULES and REGULATIONS

Kerry M. Wormwood v. Batching Systems, Inc., et al., No. 874, September Term, 1998 WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRANSMITTAL OF RECORD --

THE HANDBOOK OF THE LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ENVIRONMENTAL HEARING BOARD RULES COMMITTEE. Minutes of Meeting of November 13, 2003

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC th DCA Case No. 5D

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PST Sc1TiL. February 3, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

February 14, Enclosed is a copy of the decision resulting from the hearing held in the above-referenced matter. Sincerely,

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE MATTER OF: MAHS Docket No HHS DECISION AND ORDER

DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAMS BULLETIN COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE

RE: Pennsylvania Universal Service Fund 1/ /2017 Period Report Docket No. M

THIS NOTICE IS DIRECTED TO:

July 6, Bureau Of Workers' Compensation Medical Treatment Review Section PO Box Harrisburg, PA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIRST DISTRICT. Appellant, CASE NO. 1D vs. AHCA NO

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2012

Medicare Claims Appeals Developments and Proposals for Expansion

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 389 WDA 2012

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS.

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeal of -- ) ) The Swanson Group, Inc. ) ASBCA No ) Under Contract No. N C-9509 )

U SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. [Docket No: SSA ] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Request and Comment Request

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement

[NOTE: The following annotated sections of the C.F.R. are from BNA s Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Regulations,

Provider Dispute/Appeal Procedures

January 10, Enclosed is a copy of the decision resulting from the hearing held in the above-referenced matter. Sincerely,

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LEGAL ALERT. March 17, Sutherland SEC/FINRA Litigation Study Shows It Sometimes Pays to Take on Regulators

Appeal from the Order Entered April 1, 2016 in the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County Civil Division at No(s): C-48-CV

Enclosed please find Duquesne Light Company s Comments in the above-referenced proceeding.

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

April 6, Your courtesy in this matter is appreciated. Very truly yours, James M. Lehrer

Re: R Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Peoples Natural Gas Company LLC (1307(f)-2016 Proceeding)

Subpart B Ex Parte Appeals. in both. Other parallel citations are discouraged.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2012

GUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSION OF COLLATERAL Letters of Credit

Enclosed is a copy of the decision resulting from the hearing held in the above-referenced matter. Sincerely,

Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals 800 K Street, NW, Suite 400-N Washington, DC (202) (202) (FAX)

POLICY NUMBER: POL 48

2017 Salt Lake County Board of Equalization Administrative Rules

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : No. 691, Disciplinary Docket No.

COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Penn Treaty Network America Insurance Company (In Liquidation) (Penn Treaty Network America Life Insurance Company in California)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION AND

Disability Benefit Plan (For Members Employed in Pennsylvania and States Other Than New Jersey)

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No HHS DECISION AND ORDER

Re: PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Transmission Service Charge Effective June 1, 2011 Docket No. M

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of Barbara Hertz vs. Morris County Agriculture Development Board SADC No. 699 OAL Docket No. ADC

1. Company/Organization/Individual named in the determination ( Appellant ) Name Address Postal Code

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Ancillary Matter Cover Sheet

INFORMAL AND FORMAL APPEAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURES

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Re: DocketNo. L Rulemaking re Natural Gas Distribution Companies and Promotion of Competitive Retail Markets

Case 1:08-mc PLF Document 379 Filed 08/19/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Form. Applicability of General Rules; Preliminary Provisions; Contributions and Benefits; General Administration

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

July 20, Enclosed is a copy of the decision resulting from the hearing held in the above-referenced matter. Sincerely,

ENVIRONMENTAL HEARING BOARD RULES COMMITTEE MINUTES OF MEETING OF MARCH 8, 2018

: (Philadelphia) PER CURIAM: Recommendations cf the Disciplinary Board dated September 10, 2009, it is hereby

Regulatory Analysis Form

6. Provider Dispute Resolution Process

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. v. : Docket No. R I hereby certify that I have this day served a true copy of the following document, the

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BEFORE PARRO GUIDRY AND HUGHES JJ

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Act , was approved and adopted May 5, 1998 by the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Dollar Bank Secured Credit Card - Variable Rate Line of Credit Agreement - Pricing Information

DOCKET NO. AP ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) This case arises out of a Forcible Entry and Detainer Action that Appellee Rowell, LLC

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2013

Transcription:

PROVIDER NAME/ADDRESS: UPMC Magee Women's Health 300 Halket St. Attn: Gulf Bldg. Room# 204 Pittsburgh, PA 15213 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES PROVIDER S REPRESENTATIVE Denise DiPietro PROVIDER S WITNESS (ES) RECIPIENTS INVOLVED: Heather Jorgensen ID# 3003703745 DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE DEPARTMENT WITNESS(ES) CASE # DATE ADVERSE ACTION MAILED BHA ID NUMBER/BHA DOCKET NUMBERS/ISSUE CODES 02J1151-001/926 DATE APPPEAL RECEIVED DATE APPEAL RECEIVED IR DUE DATE POSTMARKED AT DHS AT BHA 2/23/2015 DATE SCHEDULING NOTICE MAILED RESCHEDULED TO DATE OF HEARING START TIME END TIME HEARING LOCATION TELEPHONE FACE TO FACE OTHER ORDER A hearing was properly scheduled to be conducted by an Administrative Law Judge. The Appellant was not available, nor did the Appellant provide good cause for not being available. Because the Appellant has failed to pursue the appeal, it will be DISMISSED in accordance with 55 Pa. Code 41.153. Either party to this proceeding has thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this decision to request reconsideration by the Secretary of the Department. To seek reconsideration, you must fully complete the enclosed application/petition for reconsideration. The application/petition shall be addressed to the Secretary, but delivered to the Director, Bureau of Hearings and Appeals, P.O. Box 2675, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17105-2675, and must be received in the Bureau of Hearings and Appeals within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this Order. This action does not stop the time within which an appeal must be filed to Commonwealth Court. The applicant/petitioner shall serve a copy of the application/petition for reconsideration on the opposing party(ies). The appropriate party(ies), where permitted, may take issue with this Adjudication, and Order, and may appeal to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. This appeal must be filed with the Clerk of Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 2100, P.O. Box 69185, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17106-9185. If you file an appeal with the Commonwealth Court, a copy of the appeal must be served on the government unit which made the determination in accordance with Pa. R.A.P. 1514. In this case, service must be made to: Department of Human Services, Bureau of Hearings and Appeals, 2330 Vartan Way, 2 nd Floor, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110-9721, AND Department of Human Services, Office of General Counsel, 3 rd Floor West, Health & Welfare Building, Harrisburg, PA 17120. Bureau of Hearings and Appeals Final Administrative Action and Mailing Date 7/9/2015 Tracy L. Henry, Esquire Chief Administrative Law Judge Fn12/01/2014

cc: Sarah Witmer

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES APPEAL OF: UPMC Magee Women s Health 300 Halket St. Attn: Gulf Bldg. Rm# 204 Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Attn: Denise DiPietro Docket No.: 02J1151-001 OPENING STATEMENT ADJUDICATION On February 23, 2015, the Appellant filed a Request for Hearing. ISSUE Did the Appellant include a denial notice as the basis of their appeal? FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On February 23, 2015, the Appellant filed a Request for Hearing with the Bureau of Hearing and Appeals (BHA). 2. No denial notice accompanied the appeal. 3. On June 9, 2015, BHA issued a Rule to Show Cause (Rule) offering the Appellant the opportunity to provide a notice of denial. Deadline for response was June 19, 2015. 4. As of July 8, 2015 no response has been received. APPLICABLE LAW The following section of the 55 Pa. Code applies to this appeal: 41.31. Request for hearing. (a) A provider that is aggrieved by an agency action may appeal and obtain review of that action by the Bureau by Fn12/01/2014

filing a request for hearing in accordance with this chapter. (e) If the provider received written notice of the agency action by mail or personal service, the provider shall attach to the request for hearing a copy of the transmittal letter forwarding the written notice and the first page of the written notice, or, if there is no transmittal letter, a copy of the entire written notice. The following two sections of 1 Pa. Code apply to this appeal: 35.14. Orders to show cause. Whenever an agency desires to institute a proceeding against a person under statutory or other authority, the agency may commence the action by an order to show cause setting forth the grounds for the action. The order will contain a statement of the particulars and matters concerning which the agency is inquiring, which shall be deemed to be tentative and for the purpose of framing issues for consideration and decision by the agency in the proceeding, and the order will require that the respondent named respond orally, or in writing (as provided in 35.37 (relating to answers to orders to show cause) or both. 35.37. Answers to orders to show cause. A person upon whom an order to show cause has been served under 35.14 (relating to orders to show cause) shall, if directed so to do, respond to the same by filing within the time specified in the order an answer in writing. The answer shall be drawn so as specifically to admit or deny the allegations or charges which may be made in the order, set forth the facts upon which respondent relies and state concisely the matters of law relied upon. Mere general denials of the allegations of an order to show cause which general denials are unsupported by specific facts upon which respondent relies, will not be considered as complying with this section and may be deemed a basis for entry of a final order without hearing, unless otherwise required by statute, on the ground that the response has raised no issues requiring a hearing or further proceedings. A respondent failing to file answer within the time allowed shall be deemed in default, and relevant facts stated in the order to show cause may be deemed admitted. 4

DISCUSSION As per 55 Pa. Code 41.31, a provider aggrieved by an agency action may appeal and obtain review of that action by filing a Request for Hearing. Section 41.31(e) requires that the written notice of the agency action be included with the Request. As per 1 Pa. Code 35.14, an agency may issue an order to show cause for the purpose of framing issues about which the agency is inquiring. Section 35.37 states that an answer to an order to show cause shall specifically admit or deny charges made in the order, set forth the facts upon which the respondent relies and state concisely the matters of law relied upon. Mere general denials which are unsupported by specific facts will not be considered complying with this section. In the instant case, no denial notice to the Appellant accompanied the Appellant s Request for Hearing. Appellant was offered the opportunity to provide a denial notice but did not respond. CONCLUSION An appeal cannot occur without an agency action that produces adverse affects. The Appellant did not submit a denial notice with their appeal and did not provide such notice when specifically requested. The Appellant s appeal must be DISMISSED due to unsubstantiated adverse affect from Department action. 5

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS APPEAL OF: UPMC Magee Women s Health 300 Halket St. Attn: Gulf Bldg. Rm# 204 Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Attn: Denise DiPietro Docket No.: 02J1151-001 RECOMMENDATION It is hereby RECOMMENDED that the above-captioned appeal be DISMISSED as untimely filed since it failed to meet the requirements in 55 Pa. Code 41.31. July 9, 2015 Date Michelle Drachler Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Bureau of Hearings and Appeals 6