OPP Costing Analysis. April 3, 2017

Similar documents
Town of Midland OPP Costing Exercise. Public Information Sessions August 23, 2017

Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) Municipal Policing Services in Caledon

Council recently asked me to compare the OPP costing proposals to the Pembroke Police Service costs. This exercise is a financial comparison ONLY and

Ontario Provincial Police Billing Model Overview. March, 2018

Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority Summary of the City of Buffalo s 2018 First Quarter Report

Expenditures & Revenue Summary by Category

Toronto Police Service Budget. 10 Things You Need to Know. September 19, Public Consultation

Tax Supported Preliminary Operating Budget. Book 1. Budget Summary Report FCS17001

MINISTRY OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BOOKE-ALVINSTON BY-LAW NUMBER 29 of 2017

The Corporation of the Township of Norwich. Consolidated Financial Statements

TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA Preliminary Budget Hearing October 24, 2017

2013 Approved General Government Operating Budget. Municipality of Anchorage. Finance 9-1

Report to: Council. October 26, Submitted by: Marian Simulik, City Treasurer

Reserves and Reserve Funds

REVENUES RECAP REVENUE REQUIREMENTS RECAP (OPERATING EXPENSES AND DEBT COSTS) OPERATING BUDGET BALANCING WORKSHEET

MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF SARNIA CITY COUNCIL

Transportation Services Office

2018 Operating Budget Process

2019 Budget Overview. Presentation to Budget Committee December 11, 2018

Toronto Police Service 2019 Operating Budget Request

VILLAGE OF. Illinois. Financial Planning & Reporting Process. Planning. Reporting. Annual Budget. Monthly Treasurer's Report

Council Report: C 231/2017

The Corporation of Haldimand County. Consolidated Financial Statements

Budget Reviewer s Guide

City of Waterloo Financial Dashboard

2014/2015 Budget Presentation

A loyal three made stronger in one. Loyalist Township Strategic Plan ( )

Toronto Police Service

Toronto Police Service

BU Preliminary Operating Budget & Capital Budget & Plan

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF WASAGA BEACH BY-LAW NO A BY-LAW TO SET THE TAX RATES AND TO LEVY TAXES FOR THE YEAR 2016

City of El Paso de Robles Operating and Maintenance Budget Four Year Financial Plan Fiscal Year to

Corporation of the Town of Midland Management Study

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF MIDLAND BY-LAW

Executive Summary Operating Budget and Forecast

Council Meeting January 12, 2016

The 2011 Budget was constructed assuming a status

Operating Budget Overview 2019

CityHousing Hamilton Corporation BUDGET. CityHousing Hamilton Corporation Board of Directors

The District Municipality of Muskoka. Corporate & Emergency Services Committee. Special Meeting CES Minutes

City of Niagara Falls 2018 Operating Budget

2016 Budget Presentation. Presentation to Estimates Committee December 8, 2015

Safeguarding Your Municipality s Future: Financial Sustainability and Asset Management. AMO 2015 Conference Bill Hughes August 18, 2015

TOWN OF SHELBURNE, VERMONT AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2017

2018 Performance Report

DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW. Fund: General, 911 Fees Department: Emergency Communications. Mission Statement

FORA 2020 Sunset and Transition Plan

Item 4A- President and CEO Report-December 2017 TCHC February 23, 2018 Board Meeting Report #: TCHC: Attachment 1: Scorecard Summary 2017

CITY OF MIAMI INTER OFFICE MEMORANDUM. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members DATE: May 23, 2016 of the City Commission

1. Call to Order The Presiding Officer calls the meeting to order and leads those present in a moment of contemplation.

2014 Approved Operating Budget

Program: Regulatory Services Program Based Budget Page 81

Municipality of Anchorage. Finance

TOWN OF MIDLAND ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 5, 2011

Ontario Building Code Administration

Financial Statement Discussion and Analysis For the Year Ended June 30, 2017

MINISTRY OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY

SCHEDULE 40: Consolidated Statement of Operations: Expenses

The Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements of Town of Orangeville For the year ended December 31, 2014

Audit Committee. Tax Supported Programs

Township of Georgian Bay Water & Sewer Capacity Allocation Strategy. MacTier. November, Jointly prepared by the

Rate Comparison & Benchmarking Analysis

City of Mercer Island CITY S FINANCIAL CHALLENGES: HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM

PICA Staff Report on the City of Philadelphia s Quarterly City Managers Report for the Second Quarter of FY2013

USER FRIENDLY BUDGET SECTION

City of Port Moody Financial Plan. April 08, 2008

Please find attached the Financial Forecast Report based on information through December 2017.

London District Catholic School Board. Consolidated Financial Statements August 31, 2017

HUDSON HIGHLAND GROUP, INC. UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

JUNE 2015 STRATEGIC PLAN

The Municipality of North Perth Consolidated Financial Statements For the year ended December 31, 2016

CITY OF LARAMIE FINANCIAL OUTLOOK. Malea Brown, Administrative Services Director

REVISED Feb 8/17 (Slides 2 & 41 only)

3.11. Real Estate Services. Chapter 3 Section. 1.0 Summary. Ministry of Infrastructure

Village of Ridgewood

Budget Summary. City Organization

Village of Pelham, New York

EX31.1 & EX31.2. Council Approved 2018 Operating Budget & Capital Budget & Plan

Executive Summary. Preliminary Financial Forecast

GUIDE TO THE OPERATING BUDGET

2017 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY. HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d

PDS-1. Planning & Development

The District Municipality of Muskoka 2018 Tax Supported Operating & Capital Budget Index

Town of South Palm Beach Adopted Budget Fiscal Year

Police Department Agency Overview

Township Manager s Proposed 2019 Municipal Budget Dean B. Kazinci Interim Township Manager

Proposed 2017 Budget. General Fund Stormwater Management Fund Sewer Fund Water Fund Solid Waste & Recycling Fund

GUIDE TO COMPLETING THE ESTIMATES FORMS

October 1, Mr. Gary McNamara President Association of Municipalities of Ontario University Avenue Toronto, Ontario M5H 3C6

Presentation. Preliminary FY19 Budget Discussion. December 13, 2017

Corporate Report. Recommendation That Council approve the property tax rates as detailed in Appendix 1; and

The City of Arden Hills Truth-In-Taxation Hearing:

Section E. Recap By Fund. Table of Contents

Economic Impact Assessment Study Ontario Rental Housing Sector

State of New Jersey Local Government Services

Township of Haverford

CITY OF MIAMI INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members DATE: June 22, 2017 of the City Commission

Transcription:

OPP Costing Analysis April 3, 2017 1

Background On January 20, 2014 Orangeville Council decided to request an OPP costing On November 1, 2015, the OPP lifted the moratorium on costings On December 7, 2015, Orangeville Council confirmed wish to receive costing On February 13, 2017, OPP made a proposal/presentation to Orangeville Council On February 13, 2017, Council requested a presentation by OPS On March 6, 2017, Council requested that staff prepare a financial analysis 2

Presentation Financial Analysis ONLY Short and Long Term financial analysis of both models Not a service comparison Orangeville Police Service (OPS) has a long history of serving the community since 1864 (153 years) Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) is experienced and currently serves 323 Ontario Municipalities 3

OPP Costs How it Works Two Components in a Transfer to OPP: Transition Contract 3 plus years Takeover date to December 31 (in first year) Plus 3 full calendar years OPP Billing Model Thereafter 4

OPP Transition Contract 3 plus years OPP made a presentation of and explained the transition contract on February 13, 2017 Enter an agreement for a defined number of contractual hours of service Represented by: Uniform Full Time Equivalent (FTE) 42.58 FTE Civilian FTEs 10 FTE 5

OPP Transition Contract 3 plus years (continued) OPP fills and funds all vacant FT positions OPP would restructure some positions Adds 2 Full-Time (FT) Civilian Detachment Admin Clerks Replaces 6 Part-Time (PT) Court Security positions with 3 FT positions Eliminates 10 FT and 6 PT Dispatch/Civilian Data Entry positions 6

OPP Billing Model Year 4 and beyond The Game Changer comes after the Transition Contract period Entirely different billing model Economies of Scale Advantage (323 other municipalities) Local costs uploaded to the province and redistributed Significant annual savings of more than $4.5M/year expected under the Billing Model 7

OPP Billing Model Year 4 and beyond (continued) Billing Model Difference Transition Contract (old model): Pay based on FTE plus various other supporting costs Billing Model (new model): Pay based on: Base per property cost Service Calls Overtime and Court Security/Prisoner Transportation Enhancements (if any requested) 8

OPP Billing Model Year 4 and beyond A few notes: Total Policing costs attributable to municipalities for the Province are spread based on: fixed base charges usage charges Costs published for all municipalities exclude certain municipal costs and offsetting revenues Can t simply compare to a municipality s budget Cost versus Net Cost will be discussed in the next slides 323 municipalities policed by OPP condensed to 289 for billing purposes (i.e. some are Counties or Townships which include small towns). 9

Cost per Property vs Net Cost per Property Cost per Property All OPP serviced municipalities have costs per property posted on the OPP website in one central location (289 municipalities) transparent quick comparison These are not net costs to the municipality: They exclude certain costs such as Police Service Board expenses and in most cases, would exclude facility maintenance and renewal. They also exclude all revenues such as grants and those generated by the service (reports, record checks, etc.). 10

Cost per Property vs Net Cost per Property (continued) Net Cost per Property Usually not calculated and disclosed by each individual municipality Annual budgets and financial reporting tend to value totals rather than on a property count basis as defined by the OPP Billing Model Net cost per property represents the overall net cost of policing divided by the number of properties as defined by the OPP Billing Model. 11

Cost per Property vs Net Cost per Property (continued) This presentation For comparison purposes, cost per property as defined by and reported by the OPP has been used throughout the presentation Provides ability for anybody to quickly/easily compare to others information that is publicly available Orangeville s cost per property has been calculated using the OPP s defined billing model approach compare apples to apples and hopefully reduce confusion The overall net impact to the municipality under each model is shown separately for a total $ analysis 12

Key Estimates: One-Time One-Time Severance Facility and Technology Changes Proceeds on Disposal of Vehicles and Equipment Timing of Disbandment 13

One-Time Estimate One Time Items: Uniform and Equipment - Year One Adjustment ($78,057) Uniform, Equipment and Vehicle Initial Costs $985,126 Communication Equipment Initial Cost $30,000 Facility and Technology Changes $500,000 Disposal of Vehicles/Equipment ($100,000) Severance $2,424,856 Total One-Time Items $3,761,925 14

15

Severance Estimate: One-Time Severance based on positions illustrated in previous slide/proposal by OPP Some unknowns include: Will some of the eliminated positions be offered some of the new positions? Background Investigations Rank Level Determination Amount of Severance negotiated/or arbitrated Estimated at $2.4M which includes approx. $900K of contingency 16

Facility Estimate: One-Time Facility changes have not yet been fully costed Options and detailed cost estimates are being worked on Most items are fairly minor Town may want to consider addressing some of these items regardless of which police force operates from the facility Preliminary Estimated costs are between $200K-$300K Estimated a contingency of $200K bringing the estimated changes to $500K 17

Proceeds on Disposal of Vehicles and Equipment Estimate: One-Time Would be disposing of all vehicles and Equipment Assets have value but have not been individually appraised. Conservatively estimated $100K in proceeds on disposition given that approx. $1M spent on assets since 2015 plus vehicles and various equipment on hand. 18

Timing of Disbandment Estimate: One-Time Timing of decision by Council and process through to a transition estimated at 6 months While a One-time item, the timing is crucial to overall cost to the municipality Could delay moving to the Billing Model stage by a year 19

Key Estimates Ongoing Ongoing items in both OPP and Orangeville Police Service Models estimated to be the same in both: Police Service Board Expenses Police Building/Property maintenance costs Grant Revenues Inter-Departmental transfers have been removed Added contracting out Dispatch costs for Fire/PW Note: while these are not policing costs they are included here as a cost to the municipality Reduced miscellaneous revenue expectations by $100K/year Added $100K/year contingency 20

Other Estimates Province wide Figures (2015-2017): Average annual increase in property Count = 1.41% Average annual increase in total costs charged to municipalities = 1.0% Average annual decrease in per property costs = 0.4% Town growth is approx. 1% year Conservatively estimated an annual 3% total cost increase with OPP 21

Other Estimates Orangeville Police Services Orangeville Police Services Actuals vs Budget 2016 Fiscal Year 2015 Fiscal Year 2014 Fiscal Year Actual Budget Variance Actual Budget Variance Actual Budget Variance Total Expenses $9,061,972 $9,451,422 $389,450 $9,241,657 $9,326,813 $85,157 $9,163,825 $9,055,791 ($108,034) Total Revenues ($1,187,130) ($1,176,160) $10,970 ($1,146,285) ($1,051,552) $94,732 ($1,095,064) ($924,153) $170,911 Net Costs $7,874,841 $8,275,262 $400,421 $8,095,372 $8,275,261 $179,889 $8,068,761 $8,131,638 $62,877-2.7% 0.0% 0.3% 1.8% 5 Year Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Total Expenses $9,765,451 $10,215,899 $10,523,711 $10,779,949 $10,964,407 Total Revenues ($1,558,121) ($1,714,825) ($1,766,270) ($1,819,258) ($1,873,836) Net Costs $8,207,330 $8,501,074 $8,757,441 $8,960,691 $9,090,571-0.8% 3.6% 3.0% 2.3% 1.4% 22

So, what does it cost under the OPP Billing Model? Depends. But the average is: Base costs per property (same across entire province) $191/property Average service call portion $130/property Average other costs $33/property Total average costs $354/property 23

OPP service municipalities Cumulative Per Property Costs # of Municipalities % of Total Per Property Costs # of Municipalities % of Total Less than $300 118 41% Less than $300 118 41% Between $301-$350 97 34% Less than $351 215 74% Between $351-$400 27 9% Less than $401 242 84% Between $401-$450 22 8% Less than $451 264 91% Between $451-$500 10 3% Less than $501 274 95% Between $501-$550 11 4% Less than $551 285 99% Between $551-$600 2 1% Less than $601 287 99% Between $601-$785 2 1% Less than $786 289 100% Totals 289 100% 24

Dufferin OPP Costs per Property OPP $323 OPP $300 OPP OPP $324 OPP $349 $290 OPP $306 Orangeville Police Services. Per property = $864 25

So, where do we fall? Base cost is the same for all Service Calls Volume and Severity Some calls are chargeable and others are non-chargeable Other Costs could include: Court Security/Prisoner Transportation Overtime Enhancements Accommodation 26

Crime Severity Index (CSI) and Cost Correlation $800 Crime Severity Index and Cost Correlation $700 $600 2017 Cost per Property $500 $400 $300 2017 cost Linear (2017 cost) $200 Orangeville Average CSI Ranking = $361/property. $100 $- - 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 Average CSI Ranking 27

Billing Model Property Cost used in Estimate OPP Billing Model Used in Estimates Provincial Average Over Average Base Cost per Property $ 191.24 $ 191.24 $ 0.00 Other Costs $ 62.36 $ 32.61 $ 29.76 Estimated Service Call % of Total $ 162.14 $ 130.16 $ 31.98 Estimated Total Cost per Property $ 415.74 $ 354.00 $ 61.74 % of Municipalities that pay less than estimate used 87% Above Avg 17% Per Property Costs Less than $300 Between $301-$350 Between $351-$400 Between $401-$450 Between $451-$500 Between $501-$550 Between $551-$600 Between $601-$785 # of % of Municipalities 118 97 27 22 10 11 2 2 Total 41% 34% 9% 8% 3% 4% 1% 1% Per Property Costs Less than $300 Less than $351 Less than $401 Less than $451 Less than $501 Less than $551 Less than $601 Less than $786 Cumulative # of Municipalities 118 215 242 264 274 285 287 289 % of Total 41% 74% 84% 91% 95% 99% 99% 100% Totals 289 100% 28

Billing Model Calculation Used i n Per 2017 Provincial Calc' d over OPP Billing Model Estimates % of Bill Average $ (under) Avg Base Cost per Property $ 191.24 46% $ 191.24 $ 0.00 Other Costs $ 62.36 15% $ 32.61 $ 29.76 Esti mated Servi ce Call $ 162.14 39% $ 130.16 $ 31.98 Esti mated Total Cost per Property $ 415.74 100% $ 354.00 $ 61.74 # of Properties Residential 10,718 Commercial Occupied 444 Industrial 39 Farm 1 11,202 Yr 1 Esti mated OPP Billi ng Cost $ 4,657,110 29

OPP Financial Analysis:Transition Contract & Billing Model OPP 3+ Year Contract OPP Billi ng Model 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 OPP Net Costs Esti mated Gross Polici ng Costs ( OPP Di rect ) $7,816,621 $8,051,120 $8,292,653 $8,541,433 $5,241,618 $5,398,867 $5,560,833 $5,727,658 $5,899,487 Other Impacts Other Operati ng Expenditures $323,933 $333,338 $343,025 $353,002 $363,279 $373,865 $384,767 $395,997 $407,564 Less Revenues ($1,104,583) ($1,238,681) ($1,238,681) ($1,238,681) ($1,238,681) ($1,238,681) ($1,238,681) ($1,238,681) ($1,238,681) Annual Capital Repl acement Costs $112,779 $115,035 $117,336 $119,682 $122,076 $124,517 $127,008 $129,548 $132,139 Annual Contingency $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Total other impacts ($567,871) ($690,309) ($678,321) ($665,997) ($653,326) ($640,299) ($626,906) ($613,136) ($598,979) Annual Net Costs bef ore One-Time Items $7,248,750 $7,360,811 $7,614,332 $7,875,436 $4,588,292 $4,758,567 $4,933,926 $5,114,521 $5,300,509 1st Year Adj usment f or # of Months ($6,040,625) $1,208,125 One-Ti me Costs $ 3,761,925 Total OPP Annual Costs $4,970,050 $7,360,811 $7,614,332 $7,875,436 $4,588,292 $4,758,567 $4,933,926 $5,114,521 $5,300,509 30

Orangeville Police Financial Analysis Orangevill e Poli ce Servi ces Net Costs Per Approved Budget Budget Forecast 3.6% 3.0% 2.3% 1.4% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Orangevill e Poli ce Servi ces Budget $8,207,330 $8,501,074 $8,757,441 $8,960,691 $9,090,571 $9,272,383 $9,457,830 $9,646,987 $9,839,927 Adj ustments (Appl es to Appl es Cost) Less Transf ers to Capital or Reserve ($181,746) ($171,766) ($221,716) ($224,384) ($148,340) ($151,307) ($154,333) ($157,420) ($160,568) Esti mated Annual Capital Repl acement Costs $ 385,063 $ 392,764 $ 400,619 $ 408,632 $ 416,804 $ 425,141 $ 433,643 $ 442,316 $ 451,163 Annual Capital Repl acement Costs $203,317 $220,998 $178,903 $184,248 $268,464 $273,833 $279,310 $284,896 $290,594 Annual Net Costs bef ore One-Time Items $8,410,648 $8,722,071 $8,936,344 $9,144,940 $9,359,036 $9,546,216 $9,737,141 $9,931,883 $10,130,521 1st Year Adj usment f or # of Months ($7,008,873) $1,401,775 Total Orangevill e Poli ce Servi ces Annual Costs $1,401,775 $8,722,071 $8,936,344 $9,144,940 $9,359,036 $9,546,216 $9,737,141 $9,931,883 $10,130,521 31

Summary Financial Analysis - $416/property OPP 3+ Year Contract OPP Billi ng Model 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total OPP Annua l Costs $4,970,050 $7,360,811 $7,614,332 $7,875,436 $4,588,292 $4,758,567 $4,933,926 $5,114,521 $5,300,509 Total Orangevill e Poli ce Servi ces Annua l Costs $1,401,775 $8,722,071 $8,936,344 $9,144,940 $9,359,036 $9,546,216 $9,737,141 $9,931,883 $10,130,521 Annual Cost (Savings) $3,568,276 ( $1,361,260 ) ( $1,322,012 ) ( $1,269,504 ) ( $4,770,744 ) ( $4,787,649 ) ( $4,803,214 ) ( $4,817,362 ) ( $4,830,012 ) Cumulati ve Cost (Savings) $3,568,276 $2,207,015 $885,003 ( $384,500 ) ( $5,155,244 ) ( $9,942,893 ) ( $14,746,107 ) ( $19,563,469 ) ( $24,393,481 ) 32

Billing Model Estimate - Notes Estimate used in calculations of $416/property is in-line with Collingwood and Leamington which have lower CSI scores which suggest they have more calls for service than Orangeville 87% of OPP policed municipalities pay less than $416/property 33

Analysis Using Range of Property Costs below current estimate OPP 3+ Year Contract OPP Billi ng Model 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Average Ontario $ 354 $ 354 $ 365 $ 376 $ 387 $ 398 $ 410 $ 423 $ 435 $ 448 75% of Municipaliti es below thi s amount OPP 4,970,050 7,360,811 7,614,332 7,875,436 3,809,888 3,956,811 4,108,118 4,263,938 4,424,408 Orangevill e Poli ce Service $ 1,401,775 8,722,071 8,936,344 9,144,940 9,359,036 9,546,216 9,737,141 9,931,883 10,130,521 Annual Cost (Savings) $3,568,276 ($1,361,260) ($1,322,012) ($1,269,504) ($5,549,147) ($5,589,405) ($5,629,023) ($5,667,945) ($5,706,113) Cumul ated Cost (Savings) $3,568,276 $2,207,015 $885,003 ($384,500) ($5,933,648) ($11,523,053) ($17,152,076) ($22,820,021) ($28,526,133) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 84% o f Municipaliti es bel ow this amount $ 401 $ 401 $ 413 $ 425 $ 438 $ 451 $ 465 $ 479 $ 493 $ 508 OPP 4,970,050 7,360,811 7,614,332 7,875,436 4,402,462 4,567,162 4,736,779 4,911,460 5,091,355 Orangevill e Poli ce Service $ 1,401,775 8,722,071 8,936,344 9,144,940 9,359,036 9,546,216 9,737,141 9,931,883 10,130,521 Annual Cost (Savings) $3,568,276 ($1,361,260) ($1,322,012) ($1,269,504) ($4,956,574) ($4,979,054) ($5,000,362) ($5,020,424) ($5,039,166) Cumul ated Cost (Savings) $3,568,276 $2,207,015 $885,003 ($384,500) ($5,341,074) ($10,320,128) ($15,320,490) ($20,340,913) ($25,380,079) 34

Analysis Using Range of Property Costs above current estimate OPP 3+ Year Contract OPP Billi ng Model 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 91% o f Municipaliti es bel ow this amount $ 451 $ 451 $ 465 $ 478 $ 493 $ 508 $ 523 $ 539 $ 555 $ 571 OPP 4,970,050 7,360,811 7,614,332 7,875,436 5,032,859 5,216,471 5,405,568 5,600,312 5,800,873 Orangevill e Poli ce Service $ 1,401,775 8,722,071 8,936,344 9,144,940 9,359,036 9,546,216 9,737,141 9,931,883 10,130,521 Annual Cost (Savings) $3,568,276 ($1,361,260) ($1,322,012) ($1,269,504) ($4,326,176) ($4,329,745) ($4,331,573) ($4,331,571) ($4,329,648) Cumul ated Cost (Savings) $3,568,276 $2,207,015 $885,003 ($384,500) ($4,710,677) ($9,040,421) ($13,371,994) ($17,703,566) ($22,033,213) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 95% o f Municipaliti es bel ow this amount $ 501 $ 501 $ 516 $ 532 $ 547 $ 564 $ 581 $ 598 $ 616 $ 635 % of Municipaliti es below OPP 4,970,050 7,360,811 7,614,332 7,875,436 5,663,257 5,865,781 6,074,356 6,289,164 6,510,391 Orangevill e Poli ce Service $ 1,401,775 8,722,071 8,936,344 9,144,940 9,359,036 9,546,216 9,737,141 9,931,883 10,130,521 Annual Cost (Savings) $3,568,276 ($1,361,260) ($1,322,012) ($1,269,504) ($3,695,779) ($3,680,435) ($3,662,784) ($3,642,719) ($3,620,130) Cumul ated Cost (Savings) $3,568,276 $2,207,015 $885,003 ($384,500) ($4,080,279) ($7,760,714) ($11,423,499) ($15,066,218) ($18,686,348) 35

Other Considerations Legal Fees risk uploaded to province WSIB cost reductions not estimated Municipal staffing resources freed up 36

Recap Presentation is a Financial Analysis ONLY and not a Service comparison Analysis contains significant contingencies Significant one-time initial costs will be incurred and recovered during the Transition period Under the Billing Model following the Transition period, significant annual savings of more than $4.5M per year are anticipated to be realized 37

Questions? 38