The Supply Side TOPIC 2
Goals Introduce the supply side of the economy Discuss how countries grow and why some grow faster than others Discuss total factor productivity and labor productivity Discuss how wages are set Discuss unemployment rates in the U.S. and Europe 2
The Production Function GDP (Y) is produced with capital (K) and labor (N): Y = AF(K,N) where A is Total Factor Productivity (TFP) = an index of efficiency in the use of inputs (technology) Sometimes, I will modify the production function as follows: Y = A F(K,N, other inputs) where other inputs include energy/oil Realistic example is a Cobb Douglas function for F(.): Y=AK α N 1- α with 0< α <1 3
Measurement Y is GDP in real terms (you should know what this means from lecture 1) K is typically measured as replacement cost of capital, in the same units as Y (real dollars) N is typically measured in number of workers N can also be measured using total hours worked = number of workers hours per worker Wage differentials can help to measure effective labor supply, taking into account skill differentials. N.B.: sometimes we will use N to denote total population (e.g. income per capitay/n) 4
Graphical Representation 1 Hold A and N constant (at levels A* and N*) Graph Y as a function of K Y A*F(K,N*) 1. As K increases Y increases (the curve is upward-sloping) K 2. As K increases the marginal increase in production decreases (the curve becomes flatter as K increases) 5
Graphical Representation 2 Hold A and K constant (at levels A* and K*) Graph Y as a function of N Y A*F(K*,N) 1. As N increases Y increases (the curve is upward-sloping) N 2. As N increases the marginal increase in production decreases (the curve becomes flatter as N increases) 6
Aggregate g Production Function: Fact 1 1. Constant Returns to Scale FACT 1: If you double the inputs, you double the output! Cobb-Douglas: 2Y = AF(2K,2N) 2Y = A (2K) α (2N) 1- α = 2A K α N 1- α CRUCIAL: α + (1- α) = 1! 7
Aggregate Production Function: Fact 2 2. Diminishing Returns to N and K Define MPN = Marginal Product of Labor = dy/dn Define MPK = Marginal Product of Capital = dy/dk FACT 2: MPN decreases with N and MPK decreases with K Cobb-Douglas: MPN = (1- α) ) A (K/N) α Fixing A and K, MPN falls when N increases MPK = α A (N/K)(1- α) Fixing A and N, MPK falls when K increases 8
Aggregate Production Function: Fact 3 3. Complementarities between A, K and N FACT 3: The higher the level of capital (or technology), the higher the marginal product of labor (and symmetrically for capital) Cobb-Douglas: MPN = (1- α)a (K/N) α Increasing A or K, increases MPN MPK = α A (N/K)(1- α) Increasing A or N, increases MPK 9
Aggregate Production Function: Fact 4 4. Elasticities and Income Shares Elasticity is the percentage increase in Y (dependent variable) resulting from a 1% increase in X (independent variable), everything else constant N = % change in Y / % change in N = (dy/y)/ (dn/n) = MPN / (Y/N) FACT 4: Labor Elasticity ~.7 Capital Elasticity ~.3 Cobb-Douglas: N = (1- α) and K = α That s why we pick α =.3! Share of labor income out of total GDP is about 70% Share of capital income out of total GDP is about 30% 10
Two Notions of Productivity Labor Productivity = Y/N = A (K/N).3 Driven by A and K/N Total Factor Productivity (TFP) = Y/F(K,N) = A Basically TFPi is a catch-all for anything that t effects output t other than K and N. Technical Progress (R&D, Innovation) Workweek of labor and capital Quality of labor and capital Regulation Infrastructure Specialization Strategy (entrepreneurial methods/new management techniques) Some of the above tend to make TFP procyclical (capital utilization) (Definition of Procyclical: Variable increases when Y is high, decreases when Y is low) 11
Simple examples (in words) 1. Technology : It costs FedEx $2.40 to track a package for a customer who calls by phone, but only $0.04 for one who visits its website, says Rob Carter, the firm's technology boss 2. Technology: Airline kiosks reduce costs of boarding to less than a third 3. Management: Southwest s oil hedging. Estimated oil price paid by SW: $31. United: $56 4. Infrastructure: imagine what it takes to buy intermediate inputs from a different region with bad roads in a developing country 12
Measure of Labor productivity 13
Economic Growth
Y = A F(K,N) (production function). GDP Growth Rate = ΔY/Y Growth accounting equation: Growth Accounting ΔY/Y = ΔA/A + K ΔK/K + N ΔN/N Output, in a country grows from: Growth in TFP (see entrepreneurial ability, education, roads, technology, etc.) Growth in Capital (machines, equipment, plants) Growth in Labor (population, labor participation, hours etc) 15
US Growth Accounting 1. Measure ΔY/Y, ΔK/K and ΔN/N from data 2. Pick values for K and N US Production function (from before): Y = AK.3 N.7 ΔY/Y = ΔA/A +.3 ΔK/K +.7 ΔN/N 3. Calculate ΔA/A as residual ΔA/A= ΔY/Y -.3 ΔK/K -.7 ΔN/N 16
Per Capita Growth Accounting We also care about growth in Y/N (per capita output = labor productivity). ΔY/Y = ΔA/A +.3 ΔK/K +.7 ΔN/N (ΔY/Y - ΔN/N) = ΔA/A +.3 (ΔK/K - ΔN/N) We can decompose labor productivity growth into TFP growth and capital deepening (change in capital per worker) Δ(Y/N)/(Y/N) = ΔA/A +.3Δ(K/N)/(K/N) From 1995 in the US capital deepening increased a lot! (IT revolution) 17
US Productivity: 1929-2008 Sources of Economic Growth: U.S. (% per year) 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0-0.5 1929-1948 1948-1973 1973-1982 1982-2008 labor growth capital growth TFP growth 18
Accounting for Income Differences 19
Long-run Growth What determines the evolution of GDP per capita over time? From growth accounting: ΔY/Y = ΔA/A +.3 ΔK/K +.7 ΔN/N Look at the drivers of long-run growth First we focus on willingness of a country to save (that affects ΔK/K) Then we will add productivity (ΔA/A) For simplicity: keep N constant 20
Investment goes to: Capital Accumulation 1. Replace depreciated capital (e.g. a broken computer or a computer that is scrapped because obsolete) 2. Increase the stock of ffixed capital In math: I t =d K t + ΔK t A constant fraction d of the capital stock depreciates each period ΔK t = K t+1 -K t is the increase in the stock of capital 21
The Saving Rate Suppose a country consumes a constant fraction of GDP each year: s. So total investment is I t = s Y t Combine this with our production function Y t = A F(K t,n) with constant population N and constant productivity A (for now) 22
Putting It All Together Capital accumulation is given by this is the Solow model ΔK t = s AF(K t,n) - d K t ΔK t is the difference between two terms, both dependent on the current capital stock let s plot them 23
Output Y t AF(K t t,,n) Start from our production function K t 24
Savings Y t AF(K t t,,n) s AF(K t,n) K t Savings are a fraction of GDP 25
Depreciation Y t d K t AF(K t t,,n) s AF(K t,n) K t Depreciation is a fraction of the capital stock 26
Dynamics Y t d K t AF(K t t,,n) s AF(K t,n) K t Here ΔK t is positive 27
Dynamics (continued) Y t d K t AF(K t t,,n) s AF(K t,n) K t Here ΔK t is negative 28
Dynamics (continued) Y t d K t AF(K t t,,n) s AF(K t,n) Y * K K * t The economy gradually converges towards a given level of capital K* and output ty* (we call llitth the steady state) t ) 29
Some Basic Implications Take a country that starts with an initial capital stock K t smaller than K* For a while the country will grow solely because of capital accumulation (remember growth accounting) Eventually, with A given, the country will reach the steady state and stop growing Convergence: growth will be faster at the beginning when the economy is farther away from K* 30
What Is Missing? So far: the economy will stop growing at some point In steady state, aggregate capital and output are constant What is missing? 1) Labor force growth rate 2) Saving rate may change over time 3) Productivity growth! 31
Saving Rate In the model, a higher saving rate implies higher steady state capital, and hence higher long-run living standards Imagine government implements policies to increase the incentive to save On impact, saving are higher than investment needed to keep K constant K start increasing up to a new higher steady state K** BUT in the short run consumption decreases because of higher saving! There is a fundamental trade-off between current and future consumption 32
Increase in Saving Rate Y t dk t AF(K t,n) s2af(kt,n) s 1 AF(K t,n) K* K** K t An increase in s increases the long run K* to K**! 33
Productivity Growth If productivity keeps increasing, the economy can achieve sustained growth! Higher productivity means you can produce more output with the same capital Assume that A increases This increases the steady state output for two reasons: 1) the economy is more productive for any level of capital 2) the steady state t capital level l increases 34
Back to accounting Recall labor productivity growth: Δ(Y/N)/(Y/N) = ΔA/A +.3Δ(K/N)/(K/N) K can keep growing only if s keeps increasing BUT there are natural bounds to both of them According to the Solow model, the only source of sustained growth can be productivity growth (ΔA/A)! 35
Solow Model with Productivity Growth Growth rate in the long run = productivity growth rate Countries with same productivity, same saving rate, and same population growth, but different initial capital stocks and population, will converge to the same long-run growth path Same long-run growth path = same growth rate + same Y/N level Convergence: growth will be faster when the economy is farther away from its long-run growth path 36
Data: Convergence or Divergence? Unconditional convergence: all countries should converge to same level of GDP per capita this seemed wildly contradicted in the data (actually divergence): big debate in the 90s but that s not what the model predicts, rather the model predicts Conditional convergence: countries converge to their own long- run path and tend to grow faster the farther they are from that this finds support in the data 37
Data: Convergence or Divergence? (continued) Recent developments actually show signs of unconditional convergence A stylized view: XIX century: a few countries have institutions conducive to industrialization and growth takes off only there divergence XX century: more countries follow the path, adopting institutions and technologies from more developed countries. Late developers initially grow faster more divergence XXI century: we see even more countries catching up with the world technology frontier convergence 38
Convergence and Technology Diffusion (Lucas 2000)
A snapshot of the world economy in the next 100 years
Convergence (from Financial Times 1/9/2011)
The Labor Market
Labor Demand: Firm Profit Decisions In a competitive market, a firm can sell as much Y as it wants at the going price P, and can hire as much N as it wants at the going wage W Facing W and P, a profit maximizing firm hires N to the point where MPN = W/P (the benefit from an additional worker, in terms of additional output, must equal the cost of hiring him, straight from micro) Why? MPN is decreasing in N, hence: If MPN > W/P then the firm can increase profits by increasing N. If MPN < W/P then the firm can increase profits by decreasing N. With Cobb-Douglas: MPN =.7 Y/N =.7 A (K/N).3 If firms maximize profits: W/P =.7 Y/N =.7 A (K/N).3 43
The Labor Demand Curve W/P* real wage N* MPN = N d (A,K) N 44
Notes on the Labor Demand Curve For the moment keep A and K constant N d slopes downward : N d = MPN =.7 A * (K/N).3 N d shifts up with A and K (complementarity) Caveat: Who says that there is a demand for more Y? Need to look at the demand side of economy (next lectures). 45
The Other Side of the Labor Market: Labor Supply Labor Supply (N s ) Results from Individual Optimization Decisions Households compare benefits of working (additional lifetime resources) with cost of working (forgone leisure + effort) How much labor an household will choose to supply as the real wage (before taxes) w/p varies? 2 effects: 1. Substitution effect: higher real wage means higher reward to working, hence you want to work more! 2. Income effect: higher real wage means you are richer, hence you need to work less to consume the same goods! 46
Refresh your memory from Micro! Think of an agent who gets utility from consuming apples and bananas From the utility maximization problem you get If P(apples) increases: MU(apples)/ MU(bananas) = P(apples)/P(bananas) 1. Substitution effect: you want to increase MU(apples )/ MU(bananas). By the law of diminishing marginal utility you need to consume less apples and more bananas (you substitute away from apples towards bananas) 2. Income effect: you spend more for the apples that you buy, so you are poorer. You will consume less apples AND bananas 47
From Micro to Macro The two goods that the household can consume are now consumption (C) and leisure (L) The household h can spend 1 unit of time either working (N) or having fun (L), that t is N+L = 1 The budget constraint is WN = PC (and P(C)=P for simplicity) with N=1-L. Then we can write a static version of the maximization problem as: Max U(C,L) s.t. W = PC + WL The price of leisure is the foregone wages, that is P(L) = WThen W. If W/P increases: MU(L)/ MU(C) = W/ P 1. Substitution effect: you want to increase MU(L)/ MU(C). By the law of diminishing marginal utility you need to subsitute away from leisure towards consumption goods (you need to work more!) 48 2. Income effect: you have higher wages, so you are richer. You will consume more C and L (to consume more L you need to work less!)
Back to the Labor Supply In reality the household problem is not static. Define PVLR = present value of lifetime resources, that determines the household income. For simplicity to graph the Labor Supply we separate income and substitution effects by separating PVLR from the current real wage w/p. PVLR represents the income effect and w/p the substitution effect. SHORTCUT: if w/p increases permanently PVLR increases as well, BUT if w/p increases temporarily only, then PVLR increases just a tiny bit so that we assume that PVLR does not change! 49
The Labor Supply Curve Factors Affecting Labor Supply The real wage (W/P) The household s present value of lifetime resources (PVLR) The marginal tax rate on labor income (t n ) The marginal tax rate on consumption (t c ) The value of leisure (reservation wage) (VL) The working age population (pop) Labor Supply (N s ) shows the relationship between real wages and hours worked holding everything else constant (included PVLR!) 50
The Labor Supply Curve: Substitution Effect N s s( (PVLR, t c c, t n n, pop, p, VL) W/P Substitution effect! N 51
The Labor Supply Curve: Income effect N s s( (PVLR, t c c, t n n, pop, p, VL) W/P N s ( PVLR, t c, t n, pop, VL) PVLR PVLR ( < PVLR) = income effect! N 52
Labor Supply Notes A higher w/p encourages individuals to substitute away from leisure and toward work = substitution effect (this is why the labor supply curve slopes upwards!) Estimating this substitution effect is difficult since PVLR is not easily held constant. Estimates range from 0-2 (for a 1% increase in after-tax tax w/p holding PVLR fixed, labor supply either increases between 0% and 2%) PVLR = initial wealth + present discounted value of earnings A higher PVLR induces individuals to work less (lower N s ) for a given after-tax wage, allowing them to enjoy more leisure (this is represented by a shift of the supply curve!) PVLR is net of taxes and non-work governmental transfers and inclusive of all other transfers 53
Labor Supply Notes (continued) Marginal tax rate on labor income - Should have same substitution effect as the before tax real wage. Studies of the 1986 U.S. Tax Reform found that only high-earning married women worked more in response to lower marginal income tax rates Marginal tax rate on consumption - see above Value of Leisure - If leisure/no-work becomes more/less attractive, households will work less/more (welfare programs, child care, etc.). Working Age Population: usually defined as 16-64 54
Recap on Labor Supply Substitution Effect: For a given PVLR, a higher after tax wage increases N S. This is why Labor Supply Curve Slopes Upward Income Effect For a given after-tax wage, higher PVLR decreases N s. Evidence: Weak Consensus is that, with equal (%) increase in PVLR and after-tax wage, N s falls (income effect dominates). 55
Labor Market Equilibrium W/P N s W/P* N* N d N 56
Temporary Increase in A N s W/P W/P * N* N d N 57
Permanent Increase in A N s W/P W/P* N* Income vs substitution effect N d N 58
Can Technological Progress destroy jobs? Facts: A, N, W/P are trending up over time N/pop is trending down (except in U.S. since 1980) Higher A countries have higher w/p and lower N/pop Implications: Adjusting for pop, higher A goes with lower N Higher A reduces N d and destroys jobs? NO! Labor Demand Increases Higher A increases PVLR and reduces N s - The Effect on Labor Supply is to fall. 59
What happened to US Wage inequality? Source: Goldin and Katz (2007) 60
Differential shift of A on different skill markets Increase in Wage Inequality 61
Permanent Increase in pop... N s W/P W/P* N* N d N 62
Population and Jobs More People = More Jobs 1000000 90 Employ yment (000s s) 100000 10000 1000 19 100 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000 1990 Working-Age Population (000s) 63
Temporary Increase in Taxes (t c or t n ) N s W/P W/P* N* N d N 64
Permanent Increase in Taxes (t c or t n ) N s W/P W/P* N* N d N 65
Long Run Equilibrium By definition, in the Long-Run Equilibrium the labor market clears (N = N*) At N*, labor demand = labor supply, that is, all workers who want a job are able to find a firm looking for a worker Long-run equilibrium is characterized by zero cyclical unemployment LR Equilibrium = there is no incentive for real wages to change Define Y* = A K.3 (N*).7 Y* is the long-run equilibrium level of output (or potential level) 66
The Long-Run Aggregate Supply Suppose prices (P) increase: what happens in the labor market? In real terms nothing happens! 1. Price changes have no effect on labor demand (A and K do not change) 2. Prices changes have no effect on labor supply (taxes, population, etc. do not change) You may ask Doesn t PVLR change when prices increase? NO Real wages = W/P: as long as nominal wages adjust, real wages will be unchanged when P increases The % change in P will be equal to % change in P and real wages (and hence PVLR) won t change no effect on labor supply To sum up: price changes have NO effects on labor market and hence on 67 Y*
The Long-Run Aggregate Supply Curve (LRAS) P LRAS (Long Run Aggregate Supply) Curve Y* Y vertical LRAS curve: prices do not affect production in the long run! 68
What shifts Y*? Anything that affects the labor market will affect Y* If N* increases, Y* will shift to the right. If N* decreases, Y* will shift to the left. Summary: Y* will shift right if: A increases K increases population increases labor income taxes fall (and income effect is small relative to substitution effect) labor income taxes rise (and income effect is large relative to substitution effect) 69
Take out In the long run when labor markets clear: Supply side of economy (labor market, K, A, other inputs like oil) determines output Demand side of economy (C+I+G+NX) determines prices. In the short run when labor markets do not clear: Demand and Supply jointly determine prices and output (think of the simple examples I gave graphically in the lecture for topic 1) Three outstanding issues (we will get to them soon): When is the labor market NOT in equilibrium? What does the supply curve look like when labor market doesn t clear? What determines demand? 70
When are labor markets in disequilibrium? The labor market is in disequilibrium when labor demand is not equal to labor supply Nominal wages do not adjust to clear the labor market We refer to this as sticky wages Because of wage contracts (and uncertainty), nominal wages not always adjust immediately Need a model for short run disequilibrium --- we will do later on 71
Cyclical Unemployment in Labor Markets When do we get cyclical unemployment in our models? So far NO unemployment. We need some frictions in the labor market to get cyclical unemployment. Cyclical unemployment occurs when there are no jobs available (labor demand) for those with the skills and the desire to work (labor supply) at current wages. Cyclical unemployment occurs only in disequilibrium! N s W /P b a Suppose TFP falls Unemployment N d N(1) N(0) 72
Unemployment Rates 1994 1996 1998 2000 2001 2002 2004 2007 2009 2010Q3 Britain 9.6 8.2 6.3 5.5 5.0 5.1 4.7 5.3 7.6 7.7 Japan 29 2.9 34 3.4 41 4.1 4.7 47 5.0 50 5.4 54 47 4.7 39 3.9 51 5.1 51 5.1 USA 6.1 5.4 4.5 4.0 4.8 6.0 5.5 4.6 9.3 9.6 France 12.3 12.4 11.7 9.5 8.5 8.9 96 9.6 84 8.4 95 9.5 99 9.9 Germany 8.4 8.9 9.4 7.9 7.7 8.7 9.5 8.4 7.5 6.8 Spain 24.1 22.1 18.3 14.1 10.6 11.3 10.9 8.3 18.0 20.5 Poland 18.5 19.8 18.8 9.6 8.2 9.5 Source: www.oecd.org 73
Why High Unemployment in Europe? 1. Firing restrictions 2. Generous unemployment benefits 3. Centralized wage setting 4. High minimum wages 5. Powerful unions and insiders Also low levels of employment: 6. High labor income tax rates 74
What Have We Learned So Far? There are microeconomic fundamentals to the supply side of the economy Capital accumulation, Labor and TFP are important t for production and Growth!!! Some countries grow faster than others because they have rapid growth in TFP or K/N. Only growth in TFP can lead to sustained growth in Y/N How Labor Markets Work - The Role of Taxes, Technological Progress, Capital Accumulation, And Demographics on Wages and Employment. Demand is not important for determining long run output t (i.e., income, standard of livings, etc.) Supply (production) is the only thing that determines output in the long run 75